Macbeth by Shakespeare, Commentary by Maria Rioux

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Macbeth by Shakespeare, Commentary by Maria Rioux

    1/2

    MacbethCommentary by Maria Rioux

    In Macbeth, there are no subplots, nothing to take our attention away from the the plotting of Macbeth and his wife,

    and its developing ugliness. All the action of the play follows upon a single decision by Macbeth to act on his

    ambition.

    The fact that Duncan is a wise, old, just and generous king makes Macbeths betrayal all the more repugnant. Headmits to a double betrayal: one as a soldier of the king, and one as a host to his guest.

    (Porters reference to the Gunpowder Plot: Jesuits tried to blow up the king, his heir, and both houses of Parliament

    by placing gunpowder under the Parliament building.)

    If we look to Scottish history, what Macbeth did initially was not so very grievous nor uncommon. The Scots did

    not cling to a sort of Divine right of kings, nor follow blood succession that closely.

    The evil humans commit is reflected in the weather and in the behavior of animals. Macbeth is seduced by prophecy

    and by Lady Macbeths and his own greed for power, as well as his love for Lady Macbeth and his desire to earn her

    love and respect. His initial murder might be viewed by Scots as somewhat expected, and surely, no one in the play

    seems either deceived nor surprised. However, this one act leads to other murders, culminating in the murder of a

    woman and her children as they sleep, the murder of the innocent.

    In both the plot and the language, Shakespeare explores the influence of fate and free will. The Witches could be

    vehicles of fate, or they could be Macbeths ambition personified. In support of this, Hecate reprimands the witches

    for their part in fanning the flames of Macbeths ambition as though he could, indeed, choose otherwise. Macbethseems to act, and then to sit back and resign himself to the consequence of his chosen actions as if he had no will in

    the matter.

    Macbeth is the tragic hero, for he was not always evil. He begins the play good and noble, for which he is rewarded

    with the title thane of Cawdor. He struggles against his ambition and ignoble thoughts, but is rather easily

    overcome by his wifes ambition and scorn.

    Duncan says:

    No more that Thane of Cawdor shall deceive our bosom

    interest. Go pronounce his present death, and with his former title

    greet Macbeth.

    Ironically, the granting of this title gives Macbeth the idea to kill the king. Macbeth will go far beyond deceiving

    Duncans bosom interest.

    Macbeth is astounded when he is addressed as thane of Cawdor, but Banquo warns him that evil sometimes tells

    small truths to trick people into believing larger lies. Macbeth is confused, but the thought that he might soon ruleScotland begins to erode his noble nature. Lady Macbeth knows her husbands nature all too well and braces herself

    to undermine the good in him. She fears he is all to noble to do the ugly things that must be done. One has to

    chuckle a bit at her prayer to unsex herself. She doesnt seem to require a whole lot of pushing to quiet any tender

    and gentle tendencies she might have. It is important to add that this is true only in the abstract. Once the deed is

    done, and her hands are wet with Duncans blood, she begins her decent into madness. Having denied her nature, her

    mind begins to acquire an unnatural sickness.

    Banquo is right: the witches tell only part of the truth, and then only that part which disguises the evil required for

    these events to come to pass. Macbeth argues that since the witches predictions have begun to be true, how can the

    witches be evil? If they were evil, they would lie. This ignores the evil of equivocation when partial truths serve a

    greater lie. Banquo warns against equivocation: oftentimes, to win us to our harm the instruments of darkness tell

    us truths. Shakespeare establishes Banquo as heroic and wise, a faithful servant of the king, of Scotland, and a fit

    father for future kings.

    The fact that the witches lie, or at least, shield the truth, suggests that Macbeth is not ruled by fate. He has a choice,

    which they hope to influence, but they cannot command his actions or they would not bother to hide the reality from

    him. He must be at least able to struggle against fate.

    If chance will have me king, why, chance may crown me without my stir.

    Its as if Macbeth is simply resigning himself to fate. On the other hand, we see that he does not. He takes matters

    into his own hands, not waiting for the fates to have their will. Perhaps he feels that any action is justified because

    the fates have sort of given him the nod: this is what he is meant to be, hence, meant to do.

    Lady Macbeth seems to be more vicious than her husband. She readily adjusts to the evil plans, seeking only their

    personal good. (One might ask if personal good is ever distinct from common good. )

  • 8/3/2019 Macbeth by Shakespeare, Commentary by Maria Rioux

    2/2

    Macbeth invites Banquo to a feast, already planning his demise.

    This is the first evil deed Macbeth plans without his wifes knowledge and strength. He admits to guilt and fear, but

    uses these feelings to justify further evil deeds. Since Macbeth here attempts to outsmart the witches predictions by

    killing Banquo and Fleance, a strong argument can be made that even Macbeth knows he has chosen an evil path,

    not just had one dictated to him by Fate. He begins as a hero who requires convincing from his wife. He proceeds

    from regicide to betrayal of a friend and his child. Ultimately, he murders a

    woman and her children.

    Macbeths moral decay is revealed when he says:

    For now I am bent to know, by the worst means, the worst. For mine own good all causes shall give way. I am in

    blood steppd in so far that, should I wade no more, returning were as tedious as go oer. Strange things I have in

    head, that will to hand, which must be acted ere they may be scannd

    A deeply troubled Lady Macbeth attempts to wash blood off her hands; she is not as immune to conscience as she

    had first appeared. She displays the same fears of blood and starts at knockings. We cannot help but see the parallel

    between this Lady Macbeth and Macbeth himself after the murder of the king. At that time, Lady Macbeth showed

    her nerves to be almost of steel, and her husband felt he did not know her.The Macbeths have reversed roles.

    I begin to be weary of the sun. This is Macbeth, having heard the forest has risen up against him and his wife is

    dead. While their roles were reversed, he relies on her to support his evil deeds. He recognizes the end is near and

    begins to despair. Macbeth achieved what he wanted, the ultimate power of being king, but because he

    accomplished his goals through evil, he is left with no allies or loyalty.

    Macbeth is the tragic hero who wrestles with his weaknesses and falls. He is supposed to rise to a higher level than

    from whence he fell, but I wasnt able to find that he did.

    Deceit in Macbeth is used to further the schemes of the tragic hero. Deceit in the comedies was used to aid others,

    whether consciously or unconsciously.