Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MCAS/PARCC 2016MILLBURY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
District Testing:Grades 3-8 PARCC – paper-based ELA and Math
Grade 10 MCAS ELA and Math
Grade 5, 8, 9 and 10 – Science and Technology/Eng MCAS
Big Ideas
What does the data tell us?
● areas to consider as we adjust our practice
● snapshot in time● comparisons or
benchmarking vs. state/other LEA’s or schools
What doesn’t the data tell us?● detailed/real time data● doesn’t tell the story
behind the numbers ● lack of item analysis for
PARCC● future of assessment
and comparison data
Levels and Participation Rates
District and School Levels◦ Held Harmless
Level 2 – District
Level 1 – Millbury Jr/Sr High School
Level 2 – Raymond E. Shaw School
Level 2 – Elmwood Street School
Participation Rates◦ Must have at least 95% participation rate
◦ Millbury – All Students◦ 98% - English Language Arts◦ 99% - Mathematics◦ 98% - Science/Technology
◦ Individual Buildings:◦ Elmwood – 1 Medical◦ Shaw – 1 Opt-out, 1 Medical, 2 ELA exempt◦ Jr/Sr High – 1 Opt-out, 3-4 Medical
Millbury vs. State - MCAS
Science and Technology/Engineering – All Students (grades 5, 8, 9, 10)
Millbury State
A 17 17
P 44 37
NI 30 33
W 10 13
05
101520253035404550
MCAS
MCAS Transition Plan
Grades 5 and 8 MCAS STE Transition Timeline
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
Grade 5 STE test Assess 2001/2006 standards*
Assess overlapping standards (2001/2006 and 2016)**
Assess 2016 standards
Grade 8 STE test Assess 2001/2006 standards*
Assess overlapping standards (2001/2006 and 2016)**
Assess 2016 standards
MCAS Transition Plan cont.
High School MCAS STE Transition Timeline
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20
High School STE tests
Assess 2001/2006 standards
Assess 2001/2006 standards
TBD pending BESE discussion/decision
TBD pending BESE discussion/decision
Science – Grade 5
2013 2014 2015 2016
A 48 34 20 27
P 30 38 49 42
NI 18 20 26 29
W 4 8 5 2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Science and Technology/Engineering–Grade 8
2013 2014 2015 2016
A 2 2 3 2
P 40 44 44 35
NI 45 44 38 41
W 13 9 14 22
05
101520253035404550
Science and Technology/Engineering–Grade 9
2013 2014 2015 2016
A 7 9 15 5
P 64 64 63 54
NI 21 20 19 30
W 9 7 4 11
010203040506070
Biology – Grades 9/10
2013 2014 2015 2016
A 28 22 28 34
P 36 43 53 43
NI 31 28 18 18
W 4 7 2 5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
ELA and Math – Graduation Requirement
◦ At least through the class of 2019 (current sophomores), students in high school will continue to
take MCAS to meet the competency determination requirement for high school.
English Language Arts – Grade 10
2013 2014 2015 2016
A 37 32 35 39
P 57 59 49 53
NI 5 8 13 7
W 1 1 4 1
010203040506070
Mathematics – Grade 10
2013 2014 2015 2016
A 57 48 61 60
P 22 32 21 29
NI 16 14 9 8
W 5 6 10 3
010203040506070
Millbury vs. State - PARCCNOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME – LAST YEAR RELEASED IN NOVEMBER
Parent Report
PARCC – English Language Arts
Reading/ELA – Grade 3
MCAS
2013 2014
A 16 16
P 53 54
NI 26 25
W 5 5
0102030405060
PARCC
2015 2016
Level 5 5 1
Level 4 54 62
Level 3 23 19
Level 2 11 11
Level 1 6 8
010203040506070
ELA – Grade 4
MCAS
2013 2014
A 9 10
P 50 51
NI 34 29
W 8 9
0102030405060
PARCC
2015 2016
Level 5 17 5
Level 4 56 51
Level 3 19 24
Level 2 8 14
Level 1 0 5
0102030405060
ELA – Grade 5
MCAS
2013 2014
A 22 17
P 53 55
NI 19 20
W 6 8
0102030405060
PARCC
2015 2016
Level 5 10 5
Level 4 60 67
Level 3 22 21
Level 2 7 4
Level 1 1 1
01020304050607080
ELA – Grade 6
MCAS
2013 2014
A 10 15
P 58 58
NI 26 20
W 7 6
010203040506070
PARCC
2015 2016
Level 5 11 8
Level 4 57 62
Level 3 27 23
Level 2 4 7
Level 1 1 0
010203040506070
ELA – Grade 7
MCAS
2013 2014
A 9 11
P 72 52
NI 16 32
W 4 6
01020304050607080
PARCC
2015 2016
Level 5 13 21
Level 4 40 43
Level 3 28 22
Level 2 12 11
Level 1 8 2
01020304050
ELA – Grade 8
MCAS
2013 2014
A 7 6
P 70 81
NI 12 11
W 11 2
0102030405060708090
PARCC
2015 2016
Level 5 11 11
Level 4 44 48
Level 3 26 24
Level 2 15 11
Level 1 4 6
0102030405060
ELA Cohort Data – Class of 2021 (current 8th Grade)
MCAS
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5
A 20 9 17
P 59 50 55
NI 17 34 20
W 4 8 8
010203040506070
PARCC
Grade 6 Grade 7
Level 5 11 21
Level 4 57 43
Level 3 27 22
Level 2 4 11
Level 1 1 2
0102030405060
ELA Cohort Data – Class of 2020 (current 9th grade)
MCAS
Grade3
Grade4
Grade5
Grade6
A 13 7 22 15
P 58 48 53 58
NI 23 35 19 20
W 6 11 6 6
010203040506070
PARCC
Grade 7 Grade 8
Level 5 13 11
Level 4 40 48
Level 3 28 24
Level 2 12 11
Level 1 4 6
0102030405060
How are we using this data?
PARCC English Language Arts Reference Sheet
Levels
Level 5: Exceeds Expectations
Level 4: Met Expectations
Level 3: Approached Expectations
Level 2: Partially Met Expectations
Level 1: Did Not Meet Expectations
Reference Sheet Cont.Reading Score 10-90
50+ Met Expectations
Score 10-49 Score 50-90
Writing Score 10-6035+ Met Expectations
Score 10-34 Score 36-60
Reference Sheet Cont.PARCC English Language Arts Reference Sheet
1 – Met or Exceeded Expectations
2 – Approached Expectations
3 – Did not yet meet or partially met expectations
PARCC Scores – Grade 6
Level 5: 8% Level 4: 62% Level 3: 23% Level 2: 7% Level 1: 0%
English Language Arts – Gr. 6READING
SCORE - 10-90
Score 10-49 (38%) Score 50-90 (62%)
WRITING
SCORE - 10-60
Score 10-34 (23%) Score 35-60 (77%)
Writing – Grade 6WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND
KNOWLEDGE
SCORE
1 - Met or Exceeded Expectations (77%)
2- Approached Expectations (11%)
3 - Did not yet meet or partially metexpectations (12%)
USE OF LANGUAGE CONVENTIONS
SCORE
1 - Met or Exceeded Expectations (68%)
2- Approached Expectations (19%)
3 - Did not yet meet or partially metexpectations (13%)
Reading – Grade 6
Literary Text
1 - Met or ExceededExpectations (63%)
2- ApproachedExpectations (27%)
3 - Did not yet meet orpartially met expectations(10%)
Informational Text
1 - Met or ExceededExpectations (57%)
2- ApproachedExpectations (30%)
3 - Did not yet meet orpartially met expectations(13%)
Vocabulary
1 - Met or ExceededExpectations (61%)
2- ApproachedExpectations (26%)
3 - Did not yet meet orpartially met expectations(13%)
Performance Level Descriptors
Grade: 6 Claim: Reading Literature: Students read and demonstrate comprehension of grade-level complex literary text.
STANDARD: Determine a theme or central idea of a text and how it is conveyed through particular details; provide a summary of the text distinct from personal opinions or judgments.
THE STUDENT’S RESPONSE:
-Provides a statement of a theme or central idea of a text. (1)
- Provides a description of how the theme or central idea is conveyed through particular details. (2)
- Provides a summary of the text distinct from personal opinions or judgments. (3)
Performance Level Desciptors
Grade: 6 Claim: Vocabulary Interpretation and Use: Students use context to determine the meaning of words and phrases.
STANDARD: Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative and connotative meanings; analyze the impact of a specific word choice on meaning and tone.
THE STUDENT’S RESPONSE:
- Demonstrates the ability to determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text (e.g., figurative, connotative) and/ or provides an analysis of the impact of specific word choice on meaning and/or tone. (1)
ELA Scores – Rm.
Level 5: 0% Level 4: 62% Level 3: 29% Level 2: 5% Level 1: 5%
English Language Arts – Rm. READING
SCORE - 10-90
Score 10-49 (66%) Score 50-90 (34%)
WRITING
SCORE - 10-60
Score 10-34 (38%) Score 35-60 (62%)
Writing – Rm. WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND
KNOWLEDGE
SCORE
1 - Met or Exceeded Expectations (62%)
2- Approached Expectations (19%)
3 - Did not yet meet or partially metexpectations (19%)
USE OF LANGUAGE CONVENTIONS
SCORE
1 - Met or Exceeded Expectations (67%)
2- Approached Expectations (29%)
3 - Did not yet meet or partially metexpectations (14%)
Reading – Rm.
Literary Text
1 - Met or ExceededExpectations (67%)
2- ApproachedExpectations (5%)
3 - Did not yet meet orpartially met expectations(27%)
Informational Text
1 - Met or ExceededExpectations (57%)
2- ApproachedExpectations (24%)
3 - Did not yet meet orpartially met expectations(19%)
Vocabulary
1 - Met or ExceededExpectations (47%)
2- ApproachedExpectations (43%)
3 - Did not yet meet orpartially met expectations(10%)
PARCC -Mathematics
Math – Grade 3
MCAS
2013 2014
A 39 30
P 35 44
NI 17 18
W 9 5
0
10
20
30
40
50
PARCC
2015 2016
Level 5 3 12
Level 4 44 44
Level 3 28 26
Level 2 18 13
Level 1 7 5
01020304050
Math – Grade 4
MCAS
2013 2014
A 21 29
P 39 32
NI 33 30
W 7 9
05
1015202530354045
PARCC
2015 2016
Level 5 1 1
Level 4 61 42
Level 3 26 33
Level 2 9 15
Level 1 2 9
010203040506070
Math – Grade 5
MCAS
2013 2014
A 41 33
P 32 33
NI 21 22
W 6 12
05
1015202530354045
PARCC
2015 2016
Level 5 13 9
Level 4 45 58
Level 3 29 24
Level 2 13 7
Level 1 1 1
010203040506070
Math – Grade 6
MCAS
2013 2014
A 23 31
P 43 38
NI 20 20
W 15 10
0
10
20
30
40
50
PARCC
2015 2016
Level 5 6 12
Level 4 44 48
Level 3 32 23
Level 2 16 17
Level 1 3 1
0102030405060
Math – Grade 7
MCAS
2013 2014
A 14 19
P 50 32
NI 27 24
W 9 26
0102030405060
PARCC
2015 2016
Level 5 6 10
Level 4 46 42
Level 3 38 30
Level 2 8 14
Level 1 1 4
01020304050
Math – Grade 8
MCAS
2013 2014
A 15 12
P 38 49
NI 25 30
W 22 9
0102030405060
PARCC
2015 2016
Level 5 7 13
Level 4 40 47
Level 3 24 21
Level 2 17 8
Level 1 12 10
01020304050
Math Cohort Data – Class of 2021 (current 8th grade)
MCAS
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5
A 28 21 33
P 39 39 33
NI 23 33 22
W 9 7 12
05
1015202530354045
PARCC
Grade 6 Grade 7
Level 5 6 10
Level 4 44 42
Level 3 32 30
Level 2 16 14
Level 1 3 4
01020304050
Math Cohort Data – Class of 2020 (current 9th grade)
MCAS
Grade3
Grade4
Grade5
Grade6
A 16 23 41 31
P 57 45 32 38
NI 18 26 21 20
W 9 6 6 10
0102030405060
PARCC
Grade 7 Grade 8
Level 5 6 13
Level 4 46 47
Level 3 38 21
Level 2 8 8
Level 1 1 10
01020304050
How are we using this data?
PARCC Mathematics Reference Sheet
Levels
Level 5: Exceeds Expectations
Level 4: Met Expectations
Level 3: Approached Expectations
Level 2: Partially Met Expectations
Level 1: Did Not Meet Expectations
Reference Sheet cont.PARCC Mathematics Reference Sheet
1 – Met or Exceeded Expectations
2 – Approached Expectations
3 – Did not yet meet or partially met expectations
PARCC Scores – Grade 6
Level 5: 12% Level 4: 48% Level 3: 23% Level 2: 16% Level 1: 1%
Mathematics – Grade 6
Major Content53-32-15
1 - Met or ExceededExpectations
2- ApproachedExpectations
3 - Did not yet meet orpartially met expectations
Modeling and Application
64-16-19
1 - Met or ExceededExpectations
2- ApproachedExpectations
3 - Did not yet meet orpartially met expectations
Additional and Supporting
Content67-15-19
Expressing Mathematical
Reasoning61-20-19
Performance Level Descriptors
Math Scores – Rm.
Level 5: 14% Level 4: 48% Level 3: 24% Level 2: 14% Level 1: 0%
Mathematics – Rm
Major Content57-29-14
1 - Met or ExceededExpectations
2- ApproachedExpectations
3 - Did not yet meet orpartially met expectations
Modeling and Application
57-24-19
1 - Met or ExceededExpectations
2- ApproachedExpectations
3 - Did not yet meet orpartially met expectations
Additional and Supporting
Content67-19-14
Expressing Mathematical
Reasoning67-19-14
What’s Next?
Actions that Millbury needs to continue:Curriculum mapping
Vertical alignment
Focus on improving writing across all content areas
Continue to use data to drive instruction
Continue and expand after-school opportunities
Review resources and supports for High Needs populations
Instructional practices to support common core
Align to Next Generation Science Standards
District Testing Spring 2017:Grades 4 and 8 MCAS 2.0 – computer-based ELA and Math
Grades 3, 5, 6 and 7 MCAS 2.0 - paper-based ELA and Math
Grade 10 MCAS ELA and Math
Grade 5, 8, 9 and 10 – Science and Technology/Eng MCAS
**Computer-based state assessments with implementation statewide by spring of 2019
ELA Recommended Session Times
Spring 2017 Grades 3–8 MCAS ELA Tests
Gr. Session 1
recommended testing time
Session 2
recommended testing time
Session 3
recommended testing time
Total recommended testing
time
3 60 60 45 165
4 60 60 45 165
5 60 75 45 180
6 110 100 NA 210
7 110 100 NA 210
8 110 100 NA 210
Math Recommended Session Times
Spring 2017 Grades 3–8 MCAS Mathematics Tests
Gr. Session 1 recommended testing time Session 2 recommended testing time Total recommended testing time
3 65 65 130
4 70 70 140
5 70 70 140
6 70 70 140
7 70 70 140
8 70 70 140
Additional Information: MCAS 2.0/Next Generation MCAS◦ Build upon best aspects of the MCAS the state has used
for 2 decades
◦ Include items developed by PARCC along with new items specifically created to assess MA standards
◦ Designed to be taken on the computer
◦ MA will have complete control of administration, content, testing windows, and reporting results
