45
Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation Conference Philadelphia , Pa January 26, 1999

Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures

Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation Conference

Philadelphia , PaJanuary 26, 1999

Page 2: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records; Electronic Signature

Milestones

11/91 Project Launched

7/92 Advanced Notice

8/94 Proposed Rule

3/97 Final Rule

8/97 In Effect

Paul Motise

Page 3: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

E - Record / E - Signature Acceptance

Trust

wor

thy

Reliable

Authentic & Legal

Part 11

Page 4: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

• Summary of 21 CFR, Part 11

Subpart A: General Provisions

Subpart B: Electronic Records

Subpart C: Electronic Signatures

Overview 11

• Potential Issues

• Certification Statement• Advantages and Challenges• Critical Success Factors• Security and Control

Page 5: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

AGENDA

• Summary of 21 CFR, Part 11

Subpart A: General ProvisionsSubpart B: Electronic RecordsSubpart C: Electronic Signatures

• Potential Issues

• Advantages and Challenges

• Critical Success Factors

• Security and Control

Page 6: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

Subpart A - General Provisions

Section 11.1 Scope

• Regulations establish the criteria the FDA considers for electronic records and and electronic signature to be trustworthy, reliable, and generally equivalent to paper.

• Applies to all records in electronic form under any records requirement within any FDA regulation.

• Electronic records are considered equivalent to full handwritten signatures, initials, and other general signings.

• Electronic records may be used in accordance with Part 11 unless paper records are specifically required.

• Computer system (hardware and software), controls, and relevant documentation must be available for review during FDA inspections.

Page 7: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

Electronic Record

• “Any combination of text, graphics, data, audio, pictorial, or other information representation in digital form that is created, modified, maintained, archived, retrieved, or distributed by a computer system.”

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

Page 8: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

Electronic Signature

• “A computer data compilation of any symbol or series of symbols executed, adopted, or authorized by an individual to be the legally binding equivalent of the individual’s handwritten signature.”

Page 9: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

Handwritten Signature

• “The scripted name or legal mark of an individual handwritten by that individual and executed or adopted with the present intention to authenticate a writing in a permanent form.”

• “The act of signing with a writing or marking instrument such as a pen or stylus is preserved. The scripted name or legal mark, while conventionally applied to paper, may also be applied to other devices that capture the name or mark.”

Page 10: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

Digital Signature

• “An electronic signature based upon cryptographic methods of originator authentication, computed by using a set of rules and a set of parameters such that the identity of the signer and the integrity of the data can be verified.”

Biometrics

• “A method of varifying an individual’s identity based on measurement of the individual’s physical feature(s) or repeatable action(s) where those features and/or actions are both unique to that individual and measurable.”

Page 11: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

Closed System

• “An environment in which system access is controlled by persons who are persons who are responsible for the content of electronic records that are on the system.”

Open System

• “An environment in which system access is not controlled by persons who are responsible for the content of electronic records that are on the system.”

Page 12: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

Subpart B - Electronic Records

Section 11.10-Controls for Closed Systems

• Must develop procedures and controls to ensure authenticity, integrity and confidentiality, and that signer cannot repudiate the signed record. The controls must:

• Be validated• Maintain accurate and complete records• Limit the system to authorized persons• Protect records through retention period• Contain audit trails that are secure, operator independent,

computer-generated, time-stamped, cover the creation , modification and deletion of records and do not obscure previous information

Page 13: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

Section 11.10-Controls for Closed Systems (cont.)

• Allow for the performance of operational system checks, authority checks, and device checks to ensure system, record, and data integrity

• Ensure appropriate personnel qualifications• Policies written and followed to hold personnel accountable

for actions and to deter records falsification• Control over system documentation including distribution,

access, use, revision and change control

Page 14: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

Section 11.30-Controls for Open Systems

• Must develop procedures and controls that ensure authenticity, integrity, and confidentiality of electronic records and comply with all other parts of Section 11.10

• Must use additional measures (e.g. document encryption, digital signature standards) to ensure authenticity, integrity, and confidentiality

Page 15: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

Section 11.50-Signature Manifestation

• Signed electronic records must include the printed name of the signer, date and time of signature, and the purpose of the signature (e.g. review, approval etc.) Each of these must be readable by display or printout.

Section 11.70-Signature/Record Linking

• Electronic signature and handwritten signatures must be linked to ensure signatures cannot be excised, copied, transferred or falsified.

Page 16: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

Subpart C-Electronic Signature

Section 11.100-General Requirements

• Must be unique to an individual and not reassigned• Identity of individual must be verified by organization• Must certify electronic signature system to the agency prior to or at

the time of use of the system• Certification must be submitted in paper form and, upon

agency request, provide certification that signature is legally binding

Page 17: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

Section 11.200-Electronic Signature Components and Controls• Non-Biometric signatures must:

• Contain at least two different identification components (e.g. User ID and Password)

• Single sign-on with multiple tasks: Use all identification components at first, with partial identification for each task thereafter

• Multiple sign-on without continuous access requires all identification components to be used each time

• Be used only by the owner• Ensure use by other individuals is precluded and does not

occur without collaboration by at least two other individuals

• Biometric signatures must ensure use by the owner

Page 18: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

Section 11.300-Controls for Identification Codes/Passwords

• Persons using electronic signatures must use controls to ensure security and integrity and should include:

• Assuring that no two individuals have the same combination of identification code and password

• Periodic check, recall, or revision of identification code and password

• Loss management and replacement procedures• Testing of devices (i.e. tokens or cards) that produce or maintain

identification codes or passwords to ensure proper function and unaltered state.

Page 19: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

Section 11.300 Controls for ID codes/passwords

• Unauthorized use safeguards• Report attempts in urgent & immediate manner to:

• Security unit• Management, as appropriate

Page 20: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

FDA’s View of What Industry Needs to Do

• Learn Part 11• File 11.100 (c) Certification• E-records maintained

• ID formats FDA can audit/copy• Check with FDA auditors• Watch for guidance documents

Page 21: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

FDA’s View of What Industry Needs to Do

• E-records submitted to FDA• Check docket 92S-0251

• http://www.fda.gov• Attn: logistics and guidance

• file format/media• Transmission methods/archiving

Page 22: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

SignaturesRecords

Submit Maintain Biometric Nonbiometric

Page 23: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

Part 11 Internet Web Site:

http://www.fda.gov/cder/esig/part11.htm

Page 24: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records: Electronic Signature

7520 Standish PlaceRockville, MD 20855

Paul J. MotiseConsumer Safety Officer

Division of Manufacturing and Product Quality, HFD-320Center for Drug Evaluation and Research

Phone: 301-594-1089 Fax: 301-594-2202E-mail: [email protected]

Page 25: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

Potential Issues

• The final rule does not establish numerical standards for levels of security or validation (persons have the option of determining the frequency).

• Wide spread implementation of time date stamped audit trails executed objectively and automatically and controls for limiting access to the database search software may change a company’s current practices.

• The word “ensure” is used in the regulations. It is defined as “to make certain”. How will this be interpreted by a field inspector?

• “Unique nature of passwords”. How is uniqueness determined and what are “good password practices”?

• Part 11 does not apply to paper records that are or have been transmitted by electronic means but it does apply to records in electronic form that are created, modified, maintained, archived, retrieved under any record requirement regulated by FDA.

• Record retention requirements for software and hardware used to create records that are retained in electronic form are subject to part 11.

Page 26: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

Potential Issues (Cont’d)

• “As the agency’s experience with part 11 increases certain records may need to be limited to paper if there are problems with the electronic versions of such records.”

• “It may be necessary to inspect hardware and software used to generate and maintain electronic records to determine if the provisions of part 11 are being met.”

• The assessment of adequacy of systems validation will include inspection of hardware to “determine if it matches the system documentation description of the hardware.”

• For geographically dispersed systems, inspections would extend to operations, procedures and controls at one location and the agency would inspect other locations of the network in a separate but coordinated manner.

• Is the implementation of an electronic system significant enough in manufacturing to require an NDA supplement prior to going live?

• Dial-in access over public phone lines can be a closed system if access to the system is under the control of the persons responsible for the content of the record.

Page 27: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

Potential Issues (Cont’d)

• When an organization’s electronic records are stored on systems operated by third parties the agency would consider this to be an open system.

• Electronic record is defined as “any combination of text, graphics, data, audio, pictorial or other information representation in digital form that is created, modified, maintained, archived, retrieved or distributed by a computer system.”

• “The Agency believes that if it is important enough that a record be signed, human readable displays of such records must include the printed name of the signer, the date and time of signing, and the meaning of the signature”. Example: a message from a firm’s management to employees instructing them on a particular course of action may be critical in litigation.

• “A single certification may be stated in broad terms that encompass electronic signatures of all current and future employees”.

Page 28: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

Potential Issues (Cont’d)

• 21CFR11 applies only to those records required to be created, archived, and/or signed or initialed in accordance with another (predicate rule) FDA regulation. Failure to comply with Part 11 effectively invalidates the electronic record, thus placing the firm in violation of the predicate rule requiring the record.

• The FDA is being lenient in enforcing the rule unless the investigator has reason to question the integrity of the data.

• PhRMA feels that FDA’s interpretation of the electronic record portion of the rule is flawed since many computer systems in use in R&D, clinical and QC lack the capability of generating time-date audit trails (e.g.SAS and HPLC).

• 21CFR11 has evolved from an approach to facilitate a paperless system into an FDA enforcement tool .

• PhRMA claims that the FDA definition of raw data has changed. Previous to the rule, raw data was considered to be paper documents with a handwritten signature. If the data were generated from a compuer, the printout was signed and archived as the official record.

Page 29: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

Potential Issues (Cont’d)

• FDA is considering additional guidance to try to create a procedure to ensure that electronic records can not be changed after a hardcopy has been signed.

• FDA would like to obtain a copy of each electronic file, manipulate it, study it, and pick out trends.

• The transition to paperless systems has proven to be gradual and potentially very expensive. Industry, therefore, has opted to maintain hybrid systems because many systems currently in use in R&D and Manufacturing are not able to comply with the electronic signature section of Part 11.

• As of August 20, 1997 firms that used hybrid systems had the choice of maintaining the hybrids or converting to an electronic environment, in whole or in part, to meet FDA maintenance record requirements.

• ID’s should not be reused even if the person using the ID leaves the company.

• Passwords should consist of a minimum of six characters using a combination of letters and numbers.

Page 30: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

Certification Statement

Pursuant to section 11.100 of Title 21 of the code of Federal Regulations, this

is to certify that __________________ intends that all electronic signatures Name of organization

executed by our employees, agents, or representatives, located anywhere in the

world, are the legally binding equivalent of traditional handwritten signatures.

Page 31: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

Stringent Controls

“The agency believes that…it is vital to have stringent controls in place to prevent impersonation. Such controls include: (1) requiring an individual to remain in close proximity to the workstation throughout the signing session; (2) use of automatic inactivity disconnect measures that would “de-log” the first individual if no entries or actions were taken within a fixed short timeframe; and (3) requiring that the single component needed for subsequent signings be known to, and usable only by, the authorized individual

Page 32: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

Electronic Signatures and Electronic Records

Advantages

• Electronic Batch records can eliminate mountains of paper work, speed processing and allow for statistical and trend analyses.

• NDA’s and other submissions can be submitted electronically in place of paper submission.

• Increases the speed of information exchange.

• Cost savings from reduced need for storage space.

• Manufacturing process streamlining.

• Job creation in industries involved in electronic record and electronic signature technologies.

Challenges

• Firms planning on using electronic signatures in FDA regulated environments will be required to validate the computer related systems.

• Design of systems must be well thought out and tested thoroughly.

• Critical control points must be identified which can be monitored through electronic audit trails.

• Adequate testing of security.

• Fraud Detection

Page 33: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

Electronic Signatures and Electronic Documents

Critical Success Factors

• Validation activities in manufacturing, toxicology, clinical, regulatory and perhaps marketing (label approval) will need to be better process focussed, requiring definition of inputs and outputs with, procedural controls governing the process activities and standards dictating the format and content of inputs and outputs and well documented.

• Configuration management, security management and periodic review and quality management must be a continual process.

• Record retention and record disposal practices need to be revised to reflect company requirements to comply with new regulatory requirements.

• Documentation standards and practices should be created that systematize the processes for creating and maintaining documents.

• Planning will have to take into consideration re-engineering, replacement, or retirement of a computer system when operating costs increase or business process changes.

• Requires effective change control.

Page 34: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

ELECTRONIC BATCH RECORD SYSTEMS (EBRS)

• EBRS are a critical part of an automated plant manufacturing/QC documentation system

• A completely electronic environment may include:- Computerized master and batch record documents- Electronic routing and review- Data collection- On line documents (SOPs, forms, manufacturing

instructions)- Change control- Automated batch release- Retention and archival

Page 35: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

ELECTRONIC BATCH RECORD SYSTEMS (EBRS)

Features may include:

• Online Ad-hoc inquiries• Ability to select data to download to other systems• Batch status• Trend monitoring • Traceability• Review of quality actions

- Variences- Corrections- Rework- Scrap- Calibration- Validation

• Automatic batch document removal after retention period expiration

Page 36: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

ELECTRONIC BATCH RECORD SYSTEMS (EBRS)

21 CFR 211.188 (b) (11) requires documentation of each significant step in the manufacture, processing, packing or holding of a batch including identification of persons performing, supervising or checking each significant step.

When humans are replaced by computer it is necessary to:

1. Prepare documentation to demonstrate adequate checks and performance of the system

2. Validation of the performance of the computer program controlling execution of the execution of the steps

3. Recording specific checks in batch production and control records of the initial step, any branching step and the final step.

4. Demonstrating that the computer system examines the same conditions that a human being would look for, and that the degree of accuracy

in the examination is at least equivalent.

Page 37: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

ELECTRONIC BATCH RECORD SYSTEMS (EBRS)

Steps

1. Define system requirement2. Identify documents

• Types• Forms• Text• Graphics• Exceptions• Bill of materials

3. Routing and approvals4. Change management5. Distribution6. Regulatory

• GMPs• Validation• Electronic Signatures• Security

7. System administration8. Hardware options9. Vendors

Page 38: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

• Procedural

• Physical

• Logical

Security and Control

Page 39: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

Procedural - Verification

Obtain and Review Corporate Security policy, security standards and procedures

Evaluate the effectiveness of the security organization

Evaluate the effectiveness of the process for requesting, granting and removing access.

Page 40: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

An Enterprise-Wide Security Strategy Should ….

• Identify risk, threats and potential vulnerabilities• Classify information based on sensitivity (sensitive,

public, cGMP vs. non-cGMP, etc.)• Determine and implement appropriate controls based

on risk assessment/classification• Ensure a consistent process to maintain an effective

level of security and control• Document this approach in the form of an SOP

Page 41: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

Physical Security

Review Physical Access Policy Identify sensitive areas (computer room,

data rooms, wiring closets). Determine process for granting, reviewing,

monitoring and removing access. Verify that process is operating effectively.

Page 42: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

Logical Security

• Obtain and review data access policy

• Identify access “Paths” to cGMP data– Dial-in– Internet– Local Area Network– Operating System– Database Security– Application Security

Page 43: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

Logical Security

For each access path, evaluate the following:

– user security parameters

• unique user ID/password combinations

• password change intervals (90 days)

• password composition (e.g., combination of numbers and letters required)

• password length (minimum length of 6 characters)

– access controls that enforce segregation of duties (read, write, delete)

– monitoring functionality and audit trail

Page 44: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

Logical Security - approach

• Use automated tools to gather security-related information for dial-in, Internet, operating system, database, and Local Area Network.

• Attempt to gain unauthorized access to sensitive cGMP data by exploiting “weak links” in the security chain.

• Evaluate audit trail to ensure that activity was reported and followed up.

Page 45: Meeting Regulatory Requirements for Electronic Signatures Presentation by Daniel Worden at the Validation Institute LIMS Electronic Signature/Validation

THE PATH FORWARD• GAP ANALYSIS

“As Is” processes

Design Specs

Risk Exposure

• SYSTEM CONTROLS

Security

Electronic Record Retention

Monitoring

• FRAUD

• MONITORING 483s