59
Feasibility Study Report Project:Upgrading of Pakistan Railways’ Existing Mainline (ML -1) and Establishment of Havelian Dry Port (China-Pakistan Economic Corridor) EXECUTIVESUMMARY China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd. December, 2015

ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

Feasibility Study Report

Project:Upgrading of Pakistan Railways’ Existing Mainline (ML -1) and Establishment of

Havelian Dry Port

(China-Pakistan Economic Corridor)

EXECUTIVESUMMARY

China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd.

December, 2015

Page 2: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

Content  

1.  INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 

1.1 PREFACE ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY ........................................................................................ 1 1.3 SIGNING OF FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT .......................................................................... 2 1.4 NETWORK OF PAKISTAN RAILWAYS ................................................................................ 2 1.5 TRAIN OPERATIONS ........................................................................................................ 3 1.6 PROJECT AREA ................................................................................................................ 3 1.7 SECTIONS OF ML -1 ........................................................................................................ 3 1.8SKETCH OF ML – 1 ........................................................................................................... 4 1.9SCOPE OF THE STUDY ...................................................................................................... 5 1.10STUDY YEAR .................................................................................................................. 6 1.11 AGREED PROJECTS AS PER TIMEFRAME ........................................................................ 6 1.12PROPOSED PROJECTS AS PER PR SUGGESTIONS ........................................................... 8 

2. ECONOMY AND TRAFFIC VOLUME ................................................................................ 12 

2.1ANALYSIS OF CURRENT TRAFFIC OF PR ........................................................................ 12 2.2 TRAFFIC FORECASTING ON ML -1 ................................................................................ 16 

3. TRANSPORT ORGANIZATION ........................................................................................ 19 

3.1   PASSENGER TRAINS PATTERN ..................................................................................... 19 3.2   FREIGHT TRAINS PATTERN ......................................................................................... 26 3.3   DESIGN TRANSPORT CAPACITY .................................................................................. 32 

4. GEOLOGY ..................................................................................................................... 34 

5. ROUTE (ALIGNMENT) ................................................................................................... 34 

5.1MAIN TECHNICAL PARAMETERS .................................................................................... 34 5.2ENGINEERING SECTIONS OF ML -1 ................................................................................ 35 5.2 UPGRADING OF CURVES WITH SMALL RADIUS ............................................................. 37 5.3LEVEL CROSSING ........................................................................................................... 38 5.4 FENCING........................................................................................................................ 38 

6.TRACK ........................................................................................................................... 39 

7.SUB ‐ GRADE ................................................................................................................. 39 

7.1 SUB - GRADE DEFECTS .................................................................................................. 39 7.2SUB - GRADE DEFECTS TREATMENT .............................................................................. 39 

8. LAND UTILIZATION ....................................................................................................... 40 

9.BRIDGES & CULVERTS .................................................................................................... 41 

10.TUNNELS ..................................................................................................................... 41 

11.STATIONS AND YARDS ................................................................................................. 42 

Page 3: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

12.LOCOMOTIVE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT ................................................................. 43 

12.1MAINTENANCE FACILITIES .......................................................................................... 43 12.2 PROPOSED LOCOMOTIVE QUANTITY .......................................................................... 43 

13.CARRIAGE& WAGONS (CAR) MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT ........................................... 44 

13.1 MAINTENANCE FACILITIES ......................................................................................... 44 13.2PROPOSED COACHES AND WAGONS QUANTITY .......................................................... 44 

14.WATER SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE ................................................................................... 44 

15.TELECOMMUNICATION ................................................................................................ 44 

16.SIGNALING SYSTEM ..................................................................................................... 45 

17.POWER SUPPLY ........................................................................................................... 45 

18.COMPREHENSIVE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE .................................................... 45 

19. BUILDINGS ................................................................................................................. 46 

20.ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ................................................................................... 46 

20.1 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE PROFILE ........................................................................ 46 20.2 PUBLIC CONSULTATION .............................................................................................. 47 20.3 IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ....................................................................... 47 20.4 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................... 47 

21. CONSTRUCTION ORGANIZATION PLAN ....................................................................... 48 

21.1CONSTRUCTION PERIOD .............................................................................................. 48 21.2TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PERIOD ................................................................................... 48 

22. COST ESTIMATION ...................................................................................................... 48 

23. ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................... 51 

23.1ECONOMICAL ASSESSMENT ON EXISTING LINE REHABILITATION .............................. 51 

24.STUDY FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW DRY PORT ......................................................... 52 

25. NEW LINE BETWEEN KARACHI AND KOTRI/HYDERABAD ............................................. 52 

26. RAILWAY WALTON ACADEMY UPGRADING PROJECT ................................................... 53 

27. INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT OF 8 STATIONS ............................................................... 54 

28.ELECTRIFICATION/ ELECTRIC TRACTION ....................................................................... 54 

29. CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................. 54

Page 4: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

1

1.Introduction

1.1Preface

Pakistan is gifted with a strategic location that is well suited to serve as a hub of

regional connectivity and commercial activity. To make use of this potential, it is

imperative to develop a modern transportation infrastructure as it has to play a pivotal

role in economic development and attracting investments.

Pakistan’s transport sector has played a pivotal role in the development of the

economy and contributes about 10% to the GDP and accounts for over 6% of

employment in the country. The sector consumes 35% of the total energy annually

and accounts for approximately 15% of the Public Sector Development Projects

(PSDPs).The Pakistan Railways network is an important part of the transport sector

and it has facilitated the movement of people and goods in the past. However, today it

requires structural changes to meet the challenges of the growing economy.

Unfortunately, railways pick up less than 4% of the traffic of Pakistan, which the

government would like to increase to at least 20% by 2025.

Pakistan Vision 2025 also seeks to establish an efficient and integrated transportation

system that will facilitate the development of a competitive economy. Pakistan Vision

2025 aims to build necessary, safe in mobility, effective connectivity between rural

areas and markets/urban centers, inter-provincial high-speed connectivity, integrated

road/rail networks between economic hubs (including air, sea and dry ports) and also

high capacity transportation corridors connecting major regional trading partners.

To achieve this,the Government of Pakistan has planned a major up gradation of the

railway system, including increasing speed of passenger and freight trains, doubling

of tracks of the main line sections, and increasing line capacityso as to facilitate rail

linkages to Central Asian States, China, and other neighboring countries.

1.2 Backgroundof the Study

In July 2013, China and Pakistan signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) in

Beijing in the presence of the Chinese Premier, Mr. Li Keqiang and Pakistani Prime

Page 5: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

2

Minister Nawaz Sharif. The MoU was aimed at enhancing economic regional

integration in investment, energy, trade and communication. The President of the

People’s Republic of China, H.E. Mr. Xi Jinping’s visit to Pakistan in April, 2015

further strengthened the resolve.

The aim was to create linkages between the Western Region of China and Pakistan by

establishing communication links and developing economic and trade corridors that

would facilitate economic activity along the corridors. The name China-Pakistan

Economic Corridor (CPEC) was thus put forward. The plan included physical

connectivity via railways, roads, pipelines, optic fiber etc. between China and

Pakistan.

CPEC offers a unique opportunity to Pakistan to integrate with regional developments

and become a hub for trade and manufacturing. Connectivity by rail is an important

and vital aspect of the corridor, facilitating regional connectivity and unhindered

movement of goods and people of the region. It was therefore considered necessary to

improve the existing railway network in Pakistan.

1.3 Signing of Framework Agreement

Mr. Lu Dongfu, Director of National Railway Administration, China and Ms. Parveen

Agha, Secretary/ Chairperson, Ministry of Railways, Pakistan signed the Framework

Agreement between the National Railway Administration of China and the Ministry

of Railways of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan on Joint Feasibility Study of

Upgrading the Mainline (ML -1) and establishment of Havelian Dry Port.

Subsequently, CREEC and Pakistani side signed a contract for consultancy services

between Pakistan Railways and a joint venture comprising CREEC (Lead Partner)

and NESPAK and PRACS (Partners) for Feasibility Study of Upgrading Pakistan

Railways’ existing Mainline (ML -1) and establishment of Havelian Dry Port.

1.4 Network of Pakistan Railways

Pakistan Railways has a network extending from the ports of Karachi in the south to

LandiKotal near the Afghanistan border in the northwest. It extends to Taftan in the

Page 6: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

3

west near the Iran border and connects to the Indian border in the East at Wagha near

Lahore and Khokrapar in the southeast. The network, comprising of 7,791 route

kilometers and 11,881 track kilometers, is divided into three line namely, Main Line

-1 (ML -1), Main Line -2 (ML -2) and Main Line -3 (ML -3). There are 456 railway

stations on the system.

1.5 Train Operations

Currently Pakistan Railways is operating 104 (52 pairs) of Mail, Express and

passenger trains. Nineteen (19) mail and express trains and 10 freight trains depart

from Karachi every day for up country destinations. In the year 2014-15, PR carried

52.95 million passengers amounting to 20.3 billion passenger kilometers. It carried

3.6 million tons of freight amounting 3.3 billion ton kilometers. A more realistic

picture of the potential of Pakistan Railways as a carrier of passenger and freight is

reflected in the figures of the averages of the years 2005-2010 wherein it carried 80.5

million passengers and carried 6.5 million tons of freight. More than 80% of the

revenue generated by PR comes from trains operating on ML -1.

1.6 Project Area

The project area pertains to ML -1, which extends from Kiamari(Karachi) in the south

to Peshawar in the northwest covering 1,726 kilometers and passing through

Hyderabad, Rohri (Sukkur), Multan, Lahore and Rawalpindi stations. ML-1also

includes the 91 km chord line between Lodhran and Khanewal and the 55 km section

between Taxila and Havelian. Thus ML -1 extends over a total of 1,872 kilometers.

The entire railway track on ML -1 is broad gauge (1,676 mm or 5 feet 6 inches). ML

-1 has 196 big and small railway stations.

1.7 Sections of ML -1

For the sake of the study, the infrastructure of ML -1 has been divided into the

following sections/segments:

Page 7: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

4

S.N. Section/segment Length

(Kms)

Existing Parameters

1 Kiamari - Hyderabad 182 Double track fit for speed of 110 km/h and axle load

of 23.3 tons

2 Hyderabad - Multan 748 Double track fit for speed of 110 km/h and axle load

of 23.3 tons

3 Multan - Lahore 334 Double track fit for speed of 110 km/h and axle load

of 23.3 tons

4 Lahore - Lalamusa 132 Single track fit for speed of 105 km/h and axle load of 22.86 tons

5 Lalamusa - Peshawar 330 Single track fit for speed of 105/80/65 km/h and axle load of 22.86 tons

6 Lodhran - Khanewal 91 Single track fit for speed of 110 km/h and axle load of 23.3 tons

7 Taxila - Havelian 55 Single track fit for speed of 30 km/h and axle load of 17.24 tons

Total 1872

1.8 Sketch of ML – 1

A sketch of ML -1 is given below.

Page 8: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

5

1.9 Scope of the Study

i. The study would ascertain the existing condition of the infrastructure of ML -1,

and submit recommendations for up gradation of the track so as to facilitate

operations of passenger trains at 160 km/h and freight trains at 120 km/h.As far as

possible, the up graded track would primarily follow the existing alignment, except

where sharp curves are to be eased out or eliminated to allow higher speed. Wherever

possible, but without compromising on safety of train operations, the up gradation

process should make use of the existing structures and materials.

ii. The study would also examine the prospects of construction of a new railway line

between Kiamari and Kotri/Hyderabad. This line, 163 kilometers long, would

facilitate the heavy movement of trains from the port city of Karachi to up country

destinations in the future.

Page 9: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

6

iii. Study would examine the physical and academic up gradation of Pakistan

Railways Academy at Walton so as to ensure capacity building of the human

resources of Pakistan Railways.

iv. The study would also examine the possibility of integrated commercial

development of 8 railway stations along ML -1, namely, Karachi, Hyderabad, Rohri

(Sukkur), Multan, Lahore, Rawalpindi, Peshawar and Quetta for commercially

exploiting the land near the stations. The passenger facilitation for these stations shall

be provided during up gradation of ML -1.

v. Electrification/electric traction of the entire ML -1 would be examined and

recommendations submitted for its implementation.

1.10Study Year

In line with the mutually agreed plan of the two governments under CPEC and as

approved in the Joint Cooperation Committees (JCC) meetings, the following time

frames will be followed for construction and train operations:

1. Short Term (2015 - 2020)

Phase I 2017

Phase II 2020

2. Medium Term (2020 - 2025)

3. Long Term (2025 - 2030)

4. Beyond Long Term (2030 +)

1.11 Agreed Projects as per Timeframe

Asmutually agreed between the governments of the People’s Republic of China and

the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, and as approved by the JCC meeting on 12th

November, 2015 at Karachi, the following projects shall be taken up during the above

agreed timeframes.

Page 10: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

7

There are five (5) priority sub projects planned for completion in Phase I of the short

term, i.e. by December, 2017. These are as under:

1.11.1 Short Term (2015 - 2020) - Phase I ( Up to Dec. 2017)

i. Multan - Lahore Section (334km) - Up gradation and speeding up to 160 km/h,

including up gradation of passenger facilities at Lahore and Multan Stations

ii. Hyderabad - Multan Section (748 km) - Overhaul of track and civil works,

including up gradation of passenger facilities at Rohri (Sukkur) Station

iii. Kiamari- Hyderabad Section (182 km) - Up gradation and speeding up to 160

km/h, including up gradation of passenger facilities of Karachi Cantonment and

Hyderabad Stations

iv. Establishment of a Dry Port near Havelian

v. Academic and physical up gradation of Walton Railway Academy, Lahore.

The Phase II projects of the Short Term (2015-2020) planned for completion by

December 2020 are as under:

1.11.2 Short Term (2015 -2020) - Phase II – ( Up to 2020)

i. Hyderabad- Multan Section: (748 km) -Up gradation and speeding up to160km/h

ii. Havelian Branch Line: (55 km) -Up gradation of track between Taxila and

Havelian for speeding up to 120 km/h

iii. Lahore - Lalamusa Section: (132 km) -Track doubling and speeding up to

160km/h

iv. Lalamusa - Peshawar Section: (330 km) -Track doubling and speeding up to

120km/h, including passenger facilitation of Rawalpindi and Peshawar stations

1.11.3 Medium Term (2020 - 2025)

i. Karachi - Kotri/ Hyderabad new line (163 km)

ii. Up gradation of Pakistan Walton Academy

Page 11: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

8

iii. Lodhran -Khanewal Section via chord: (91 km) - Up gradation and speeding up to

160km/h

1.11.4Long Term (2025 -2030)

Complete electrification of ML -1

1.11.5 Beyond Long Term (2030+)

Comprehensive commercial development of eight railway stations along ML -1,

namely, Karachi, Hyderabad, Rohri (Sukkur), Multan, Lahore, Rawalpindi, Peshawar

and Quetta.

1.12Proposed Projects As Per PR Suggestions

The projects and the time frames given above have already been approved by the JCC

and the respective railway ministries of the two countries. Now that the feasibility

study has been finalized and considerable data has emerged, PR officials and experts

of PIU/PR/CPEC take the view that some of the projects included in Phase I of the

Short Term and some projects of the Medium and Long Terms need to be modified so

as to fulfill the demands of government and also to facilitate smooth train operations

during the construction stage in Phase I and II.

Kiamari - Hyderabad section is a critical link of the PR network where no alternate

routes are available for diversion of the existing train operations. From traffic point of

view, both freight and passenger, this section is frequently utilized. Presently, nineteen

(19) pairs of mail/express trains and about ten (10) pairs of freight trains, run on the

section every day. In view of the topography of the terrain, complicated track

geometry and ground realities, it is a difficult section to be upgraded to higher speed

of 160 km/h. Moreover, major realignment works would also be required during up

gradation resulting in serious disruption of train operations.

In view of the position explained above and to avoid major setback to train operations

Page 12: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

9

and inconvenience to the travelling public, it is proposed that the work on Kiamari -

Hyderabad Section (182 km) for up gradation and speeding up to 160 km/h should be

deferred for the time being. It is further proposed that construction of the new Karachi

- Hyderabad track may be initiated in Short Term, Phase II rather than Medium Term.

Once this line is completed, the passenger trains will be shifted to the new line

whereas the existing line will be dedicated for freight traffic, due to its connectivity to

KPT, Port Qasim and marshalling yards at Pipri, Kiamari and RG oil terminal.

Instead of up gradation of existing Kiamari- Hyderabad section in Phase I to 160 km/h,

it would be appropriate to overhaul the section to make it fit for the existing speed,

including overhaul of track and civil works and up gradation of passenger facilities at

Karachi Cantt. Station.

In lieu of the foregone up gradation of Kiamari - Hyderabad section, work should be

initiated on the doubling of Peshawar -Lalamusa segment, starting work from

Peshawar end. To facilitate reduction in transit time of trains between Lahore -

Rawalpindi - Peshawar, priority should be given to realignment of 52 - kilometer long,

Pindora - Kaluwal section, located on Peshawar - Lalamusa segment.

Moreover deferring electrification project of ML-1 to the Long Term in 2025

-2030would also not be beneficial for the future of PR. It was proposed that the

project of electrification of ML-1 be taken up in Mid Term (2020 -2025). PR team

was also of the opinion that the project of commercial development of eight railway

stations was of such a nature that it could be taken up sooner than 2030+ and as such

it had little bearing on the up gradation of ML -1. The commercial development of

stations was a project which could generate revenues immediately on commencement

and only a small amount of seed money was required to be allocated initially. The

amount estimated for commercial development by the consultant was rather high and

needed to be re considered as the project had no direct bearing on the up gradation of

ML -1. MsCREEC experts discussed the above mentioned changes with PR and PIU

and concluded that the modifications proposed were technically feasible and that the

timeframe of the projects could be modified according to the priority of the client.

However, Ms CREEC was of the opinion that since the projects had already been

approved by the JCC meeting of 12th November, 2015 at Karachi, the proposed

Page 13: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

10

changes need to be reapproved by the relevant authorities of the both governments.

The modified suggested proposal will be as follows:

1.12.1Short Term (2015 - 2020) - Phase I ( Up to Dec. 2017)

i. Multan - Lahore Section (334km) - Up gradation and speeding up to 160 km/h,

including up gradation of passenger facilities at Lahore and Multan Stations

ii. Hyderabad - Multan Section (748 km) -Overhaul of track and civil works,including

up gradation of passenger facilities at Hyderabad and Rohri (Sukkur)stations.

iii. Kiamari - Hyderabad Section (182 km) -Overhaul of track and civil works,

including up gradation of passenger facilities at Karachi Cantt. station.

iv.Peshawar - Rawalpindi Section (159 km) - Doubling of track between Peshawar

and Rawalpindi, starting from Peshawar, including passenger facilitation of

Rawalpindi and Peshawar stations.

v. Start construction work of realignment and doubling of track on Kaluwal–Pindora

section(52km).

vi. Establishment of a Dry Port near Havelian

vii. Academic and physical up gradation of Walton Railway Academy, Lahore.

1.12.2 Short Term (2015 -2020) - Phase II( Up to 2020)

i. Hyderabad- Multan Section: (748 km) - Up gradation and speeding upto160km/h

ii. Havelian Branch Line: (55 km) -Up gradation of track between Taxila and

Havelian for speeds up to 120 km/h

iii. Lahore - Lalamusa Section: (132 km) -Track doubling and speeding up to

160km/h

iv. Rawalpindi - Lalamusa Section (170 km) - Work on doubling of trackwill continue

and be completed in this phase except the already completed Kaluwal-Pindora section

in Phase I.

v. Karachi - Kotri/ Hyderabad new line (163 km) - Construction of new line.

1.12.3Medium Term (2020 - 2025)

Page 14: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

11

i. Further up gradation of Pakistan Walton Academy

ii. Lodhran - Khanewal Section via chord: (91 km) –Upgradation and speeding up to

160km/h

iii. Complete electrification of ML -1

iv. Comprehensive commercial development of 8 railway stations along ML -1,

namely, Karachi, Hyderabad, Rohri (Sukkur), Multan, Lahore, Rawalpindi, Peshawar

and Quetta.

1.12.4Long Term (2025 -2030)

Nil

1.12.5Beyond Long Term (2030+)

Nil

1.13 Additional Studies to be Conducted by Ms CREEC

As per TOR’s,Ms CREEC had been assigned the task of studying Lalamusa

-Peshawar section for up gradation to 160 km/h. M/s CREEC has studied two options,

one for 120 km/h and another for 160 km/h. However, Ms CREEC may now study the

possibility of up gradation of the section to 160 km/h in some of the flat stretches,

wherever possible. The remaining section, wherever it is difficult because of terrain

problems, the speed would be limited to 120 km/h. Since this exercise was part of the

TOR’s the study would be done from within the current allocation and Ms CREEC

would submit a report by March, 2016, but without affecting the submission of the

already finalized feasibility report.

PR also requested Ms CREEC to undertake an additional study of up gradation of the

existing Peshawar - Torkham section (60 km). The section is an extension of ML-1

and is extremely important from regional connectivity point of view. Moreover, it

ismostly located in the under developed Khyber Agency of Federally Administered

Tribal Areas and its up gradation would serve the people of the area.

Page 15: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

12

PR also requested the Consultant to undertake an additional study for a double line

rail connection between Havelian - Abbottabad - Manshera and Dodhial, a distance of

about 60 km. The study should also include doubling of the existing single line from

Taxila to Havelian, so as to cater for smooth movement of reliable traffic between

China and Pakistan via the Karakoram Highway or the planned rail link between

Kashgar - Havelian in the future. Both the above mentioned sections are extensions of

ML-1.

2. Economy and Traffic Volume

2.1Analysis of Current Traffic of PR

This section would discuss the current volumes and pattern of train operations as a

whole and look at passenger and freight sectors in detail.

2.1.1Current TrafficVolumes of PR

Currently Pakistan Railways is operating 104 (52 pairs) of Mail, Express and

passenger trains. Nineteen (19) mail and express trains and 10 freight trains depart

from Karachi every day for up country destinations. In the year 2014-15, PR carried

52.95 million passengers (20.3 billion passenger kilometers). It carried 3.6 million

tons of freight (3.3 billion ton kilometers). A more realistic picture of the potential of

Pakistan Railways as a carrier of passenger and freight is reflected in the figures of

the averages of the years 2005-2010 wherein it carried 80.5 million passengers and

carried 6.5 million tons of freight. More than 80% of the revenue generated by PR

comes from trains operating on ML -1.

2.1.2Current Passenger Traffic

Pakistan Railways is operating 104 (52 pairs) of mail, express and passenger trains on

the network on a daily basis today. Nineteen (19) pairs of mail and express trains

depart from Karachi every day for up country destinations using ML -1. Besides these

long distance trains there are intercity trains running on ML -1, between Rawalpindi

Page 16: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

13

and Lahore (5 pairs), Lahore - Multan (1 pair), Rawalpindi - Quetta (1 pair) and

Lahore - Quetta (1 pair) .

In the year 2014-15, PR carried about 53 million passengers amounting to 20.3 billion

passenger kilometers. A total of 33,374 passenger trains were run in 2014-15 on the

system. A typical long distance passenger train comprises of 17 to 18 coaches and

operates at a maximum speed of 110 km/h. On the average,each train has a capacity of

carrying about 900 to 1,100 passengers.

The average lead of a passenger was 383 kilometers during 2014-15. The average lead

of passenger has beingrising continuously from 80 kilometers in the year 1975. This

reflects that PR has been increasinglymeeting the demand for long distance travel and

short distance passengers have been reduced; a good step for the financial health of

railways.

The following long distance passenger trains operate on ML -1:

Karachi - Peshawar area 3 pairs

Karachi - Rawalpindi area 5 pairs

Karachi - Lahore area 7 pairs

Karachi - Multan 1 pair

Karachi - Rohri/Sukkur 1 pair

Karachi - Quetta 1 pair

Rawalpindi - Quetta 1 pair

Lahore - Quetta 1 pair

Lahore - Multan 1 pair

Lahore - Rawalpindi 5 pairs

Total 26 pairs

A more realistic picture of the potential passenger traffic is reflected in the figures of

the averages of the years 2005-2010 wherein PR carried 80.5 million passengers and

achieved almost 21 billion passenger kilometers. An average of 270 passenger trains

ran daily on the system, however, most of the short distance trains were financially

nonviable. About 80% of the revenue from passenger sector is generated by trains

operating on ML -1.

Page 17: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

14

2.1.3Current Freight Traffic

During the year 2014-15, PR carried 3.6 million tons of freight (3.3 billion ton

kilometers). The freight traffic has picked up this year but it was on a constant decline

from 2010 onwards. At one time there was hardly any freight train leaving the ports of

Karachi. This was due to the acute shortage of locomotives in the freight pool. Freight

business almost came to a halt, and the traffic started moving by road in

uneconomical trucks.

A more realistic picture of the potential of Pakistan Railways as a carrier of freight is

reflected in the figures of the averages of the years 2005-2010 wherein it carried 6.5

million tons of freight. In 1965-70, PR managed to carry more than 14 million tons of

cargo. This reflects that PR has the potential of moving bigger volumes of freight but

due to severe shortage of locomotives during 2010 to 2015 it could not meet the ever

present demand of the freight traffic. During 2014-2015, PR ran 5442 freight trains.

Today about 10 freight trains depart from Karachi for up country destinations every

day. The trailing load of a freight train with bogie wagons is 2400 tons and it can

travel at 80 km/h whereas a freight train with four wheeler stock can go at a maximum

speed of 70 km/h with the same trailing load.

2.1.4Current Line Capacity of ML -1

The current line capacity of ML -1 is given below in Table:

S. N.

Section Track Governing

Block Section

Distance KM

Line Capacity Each Way

1 KYC-KOT Double MTG-BOL 20.87 75

2 KOT-ROH Double SRH-NWS 17.19 41

3 ROH-LON Double PNL-GHK 25.39 32

Page 18: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

15

4 KWL - LON (Via Loop)

Double GLW-SJB 22.96 34

5 KWL - LON (Via Chord)

Single KUZ-JAI 17.02 20

6 KWL-LHR Double CCE-HAP 21.9 35

7 LHR-RWP Single SIH-CKL 11.63 25

8 RWP-PSC Single PII-PBI 10.75 26

9 TXL - HVN Single 15

The above line capacity has been worked out on the basis of ‘Scots formula’ for

determining line capacity and is based on the slowest freight train speeds of 70 km/h

and governing/longest block sections in the segment. As can be seen from the

abovetable the line capacity is 75 pairs of trains from Kiamari to Kotri due to auto

block and only 41 train pair between Kotri and Rohri. The line capacity reduces to 32

trains beyond Rohri and becomes 26 between Rawalpindi and Peshawar.

The actual utilization of the above line capacity in terms of trains on each section is

shown in the table below:

S. N.

Section Track Distance

KM

Line Capacity Available Each Way

Utilization

Remaining Line Capacity

Passenger/Freight Trains

1 KYC-KOT Double 20.87 75 19+10=29 46

2 KOT-ROH Double 17.19 41 17 +10=27 14

3 ROH-LON Double 25.39 32 17+10=27 5

4 KWL - LON

(Via Loop)Double 22.96 34 11+5=17 17

Page 19: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

16

5 KWL - LON

(Via Chord)Single 17.02 20 6+1=7 13

6 KWL-LHR Double 21.9 35 10+4=14 21

7 LHR-RWP Single 12.1 25 11+1=12 13

8 RWP-PSC Single 10.75 26 3 23

2.2 Traffic Forecasting on ML -1

The forecasted passenger and freight traffic on ML -1 have been calculated on the

basis of base year and the assumptions made as explained below.

2.2.1 Base Year Assumptions

For the sake of the traffic forecasting, it was decided to take 2010 as the base year and

figures of both passenger and freight traffic have been take as the reference point.

The rationale for taking 2010 as the base year is that traffic volume and earning

figures for the last five years, from 2010 to 2015, for both passenger and freight, have

declined drastically only due to one major reason; the shortage of hauling power,

namely, locomotives. All other factors like infrastructure, passenger and freight

coaches, demand for passenger travel, demand for movement of good, etc. remained

the same. The demand for movement of people and goods remained un-fulfilled due

to lack of availability of fit locomotives to run trains. With the introduction of new

locomotives, the traffic has again started increasing. This means that PR did have the

demand for traffic but could not pick it up due to locomotive constraints.

Another important assumption for forecasting future traffic on ML -1, the project area,

was to assume that the pattern of passenger and freight traffic would behave in the

same manner as in the past. That is, that 80% of entire traffic of PR would move via

ML -1and the passenger and freight traffic would increase proportionately on the up

graded lines. The freight traffic pattern would be that loaded trains would leave the

ports of Karachi for up country destinations and return mostly empty in the down

direction. Nominal freight traffic of 3% to 10% in the down direction has been

forecasted from 2020 to 2025 which would increase to 15% in 2030 and 25% in

Page 20: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

17

2040.This would cater for the potential traffic generated for export from up country to

Karachi and from Havelian Dry Port as China - Pakistan trade for export from China

to Karachi.

Starting from the base year of 2010, 1% annual increase in passenger and freight

traffic has been assumed, and calculated up to the year 2017, i.e. the year when Phase

I of the up gradation project is planned to be completed. From 2017 to 2020, an

increase of 3% per annum has been assumed whereas from 2021 to 2025 the increase

in traffic has been assumed to be 5%. From 2025 to 2030 the increase is expected to

be 3%.

2.2.2 Passenger Traffic Forecast

During the base year of 2010, PR had carried 80.5 million passengers, out of which 64

million or 80%, travelled on trains operating on ML -1. Assuming a 1% increase from

2010 to 2017, it can be assumed that 67.73 million people travelled on the ML -1 in

2015; 69.09 million would travel in 2018. By 2018, the up gradation of only Kiamari -

Hyderabad and Lahore - Multan section and over hauling of Hyderabad - Multan

section would have been completed; therefore,the assumption of a 3% increase in

passenger from 2017 to 2020 has been made. The number of passengers travelling on

ML -1 in 2021 would be 75.49 million.

Once the track from Karachi to Peshawar has been up graded 2020 to cater for

passenger trains speeds of 160 km/h, a 5% increase per annum in passenger traffic has

been assumed up to 2025. Thus in 2026,96.35 million passengers are expected to

travel on ML -1 and from 2025 to 2030 an annual increase of 3% has been assumed

and as such the total passengers travelling would increase to 111.70 million in 2031.

Although up gradation of Kiamari and Hyderabad section would have been completed

and the rest of the track up to Multan would have been overhauled by December 2017,

but the line capacity would remain the same beyond Kotri. This line capacity would

change after up gradation in 2020; as such, running of additional trains beyond the

existing line capacity of 32 between Rohri will not be possible. To facilitate the

demand for fast travel, intercity trains can be introduced on Lahore - Multan and

Page 21: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

18

Kiamari - Hyderabad sections.

2.2.3 Freight Traffic Forecast

For the sake of traffic forecasting of freight traffic on PR in the future, 2010 has been

taken as the base year. It has also been presumed that 80% of the freight trains used

ML -1 for reaching up country destinations and that the pattern of freight traffic would

generally remain the same in the future, as today; i.e. loaded freight trains would

depart from the ports of Karachi to up country destinations and mostly empty rakes

will be hauled back in the down direction. For the sake of forecasting, 15% of the

freight trains would be loaded in the down direction in 2025 and 25% loaded freight

trains would be operated in down direction by 2030. The limiting factor for line

capacity up to 2020 would be the section beyond Rohri, having a line capacity limited

to 32 pairs of trains per day.

It should also be kept in mind that from 2015 to 2020, the trailing load (tractive

tonnage) of a freight train would remain 2400 tons. Once the entire ML -1 from

Karachi to Peshawar is up graded by 2020, it would be possible to operate freight

trains of 3400 tons trailing load or 2400 pay loads.

During the base year of 2010, PR had carried a total of 5.2 million tons of cargo on

ML -1. Assuming a 1% increase from 2010 to 2017, it is can be assumed that 5.5

million tons should have been transported in 2015; 9.6 million tons would be

transported by freight trains using ML -1 in 2018; including 4 million tons of

imported coal for Sahiwal Power plant. Although by 2018, the up gradation of

Kiamari - Hyderabad and Lahore - Multan sections and over hauling of Hyderabad -

Multan section would have been completed according to the short term plan; however

due to the restricted line capacity of 32 pairs of trains beyond Rohri, it would not be

possible to operate more freight trains on ML -1 till complete up gradation in 2020.

The Sahiwal power plant is expected to start functioning by the end of December,

2017 and as such imported coal from Port Qasim will start moving to Sahiwal by July,

2017. Therefore the assumption of a 3% increase in freight from 2017 to 2020 has

been made. As such, 22.4 million tons of cargo will move on ML -1 by 2021,

presuming that coal fired power plants would start operating at Muzaffargarh, Rahim

Page 22: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

19

Yar Khan and Jamshoro, as per government plans.

Once the track from Karachi to Peshawar has been up graded by 2020 to cater for

freight trains with the speed of 120 km/h, a 5% increase per annum in freight traffic

has been assumed up to 2025. Thus in 2026,29 million tons are expected to move on

ML -1. From 2025 to 2030, an annual increase of 3% has been assumed and, as

such,atotal of 38.3million tons of cargo would move on ML -1 by 2031.

3. Transport Organization

The current traction mass (trailing load) on ML -1 is 2400 tons for freight train and

around 29bogie wagons are marshaled for one train whereas for the passenger trains

the traction mass is 800 tons and around 10 -18 coaches are marshaled for one train.

Based on the traffic volume forecast and rolling stock parameters provided by China,

the traction mass would be 3400 tons for freight train and about 41 high capacity

freight wagons would be marshaled for one freight train. The traction mass (trailing

load)would be 900 tons for passenger train and around 10 - 18 coaches would be

marshaled for one passenger train. The specific marshaling scheme will depend on the

type of coaches attached to each train.

3.1 Passenger Trains Pattern

Assuming that the pattern of passenger trains remains the same as today, the

passenger train pairs have been forecasted for the future. After completion of Phase I

in December, 2017, it has been calculated that there would be a demand for running

29 passenger trains as per passenger traffic forecast for 2018, as against 18 today.

However, this demand would be difficult to meet. Although up gradation of Kiamari

and Hyderabad section would have been completed and the rest of the track up to

Multan would have been over hauled by December 2017, but the line capacity would

remain the same beyond Kotri. This line capacity would change after up gradation in

2020; as such, running of additional trains beyond the existing line capacity of 32

between Rohri will not be possible. To facilitate the demand for fast travel, intercity

trains can be introduced on Lahore - Multan and Kiamari - Hyderabad sections.

Page 23: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

20

In 2020 the demand would be for 35 trains; in 2025 the demand would increase to 47

trains and in 2030 there would be a demand for 56 trains ex Karachi. The demand for

running intercity trains on ML -1 between Karachi -Hyderabad, Lahore - Multan,

Lahore - Rawalpindi, Rawalpindi - Peshawar and Peshawar - Lahore would be

additional and has also been calculated separately.

The sketch below shows the forecasted passenger trains between different OD pairs

for 2017, 2020, 2025 and 2030.

Page 24: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

21

Page 25: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

22

Page 26: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

23

Page 27: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

24

Page 28: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

25

Page 29: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

26

Table showing pairs of passenger trains on different sections in different phases

S.N. Section

Origin - Destination

Pairs

Trains

2015

Pairs

Trains

2017

Pairs

Trains

2020

Pairs

Trains

2025

Pairs

Trains

2030

Remarks

1 Karachi - Peshawar 3 5 6 7 7 2 Karachi - Rawalpindi 5 7 8 12 15 3 Karachi - Lahore 7 12 14 18 22 4 Karachi - Multan 1 1 1 2 3 5 Karachi - Rohri 1 2 2 2 2 6 Karachi - Quetta 1 1 2 3 4 7 Karachi - MirpurKhas 1 2 3 3 Sub Total 18 29 35 47 56

8 Rawalpindi-Quetta 1 1 2 2 3

9 Lahore - Quetta 1 1 2 2 3

10 Lahore - Multan 1 3 3 4 4

11 Lahore - Rawalpindi 5 8 10 12 14

12 Rawalpindi - Peshawar 0 1 2 2 2

13 Lahore - Peshawar 0 1 2 2 3

14 Karachi - Hyderabad 0 3 3 3 4 Total 26 47 59 74 89

3.2 Freight Trains Pattern

The existing trailing load of freight trains on PR is 2400 tons, out of which 1656 tons

is the pay load whereas the rest is tare of the wagons and brake van. After up

gradation, the trailing load would increase to 3400 tons, with 2400 tons as payload

and the rest as tare. The existing maximum speed of a freight train with four wheeler

stock is 70 km/h, whereas after up gradation the speed would be 100 km/h for loaded

and 120 km/h for empty rake of freight trains.

Assuming that the pattern of freight trains remains the same as today, with loaded

trains moving out from the ports of Karachi and empty rakes being hauled back, the

number of freight train pairs has been forecasted for the future. After completion of

Phase I in December, 2017, it has been calculated that there would be a demand for

running 14 freight trains as per freight traffic forecast for 2018, as against 10 today.

Page 30: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

27

However, this demand would be difficult to meet. Although up gradation of Kiamari

and Hyderabad section would have been completed and the rest of the track up to

Multan would have been over hauled by December 2017, but the line capacity would

remain the same beyond Kotri, thus, limiting the option of running more freight trains.

This line capacity would change after up gradation in 2020; as such, running of

additional trains beyond the existing line capacity of 32 between Rohri will not be

possible.

From 2021 up to 2025, the demand would be 33 freight trains of 3400 tractive tons

(trailing load) for each train: in 2026 to 2030 the demand would increase to44 trains

and in 2031 to 2040 there would be a demand for 45 freight trains ex Karachi. With a

line capacity of more than 171 pair on the entire ML -1, it would be possible to run

trains with about 8 minute head way.

Diagrammatically, the freight train operation on ML -1, after the up gradation and

enhancement of line capacity 2021, would be as under:

The pair number for each section of ML -1, 2017 and2020with 2400 tractive tonnage

and29marshalling, 2025,2030 and2040with 3400t tractive tonnage and 41

marshalling.

Section 2017

(2400t) 2020

(2400t) 2025

(3400t) 2030

(3400t) 2040

(3400t) Karachi-Hyderabad 15 37 34 45 46 Hyderabad-Rohri 15 30 28 40 41

Rohri-Lodhran 15 30 28 40 41 Lodhran-Khanewal 14 22 23 34 35 Khanewal-Lahore 12 12 9 20 21

Lahore-Rawalpindi 3 3 2 3 3 Rawalpindi-Peshawar 2 2 2 2 2

Page 31: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

28

Page 32: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

29

Page 33: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

30

Page 34: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

31

Page 35: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

32

3.3 Design Transport Capacity

After up gradation of ML -1from Karachi to Peshawar in 2020, the line capacity of

the entire track from Kiamari to Peshawar would be 171 pairs of trains per

Page 36: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

33

day.Autoblock train tracking interval of 8 minutes would be installed facilitating the

increase in line capacity. The tractive tonnage would be 3400 tons for freight trains

and900 tons for passenger trains. Passenger trains would travel at a maximum speed

of 160km/h whereas freight trains would run at 100 km/h when loaded and at 120

km/h when empty.

According to the ML -1 construction scheme, Karachi- Peshawar section shall be

upgraded by adopting Chinese four-color (green, green yellowish, yellow and red)

displays double line automatic blocking system. Block sections are as follows:

Green Green G+Y Yellow Red

The average running speed of freight train has been taken as 70km/h. The average

distance between two trains would be about 6 kilometers. The distance between two

signals is about 1.2 kilometers. Signal shall be set at the tracking interval of 8 minutes

including 3 minutes slack margin.

Automatic Block Methodology is adopted for train operation as under:

In the formula, t (time of maintenance) means the time spent on daily routine line

maintenance of infrastructure. The time of maintenance is 70 minutes for double line

in 24 hours.

I (interval time between 2 trains) is 8 minutes.So:

)/1718

706024 daypairstyLineCapaci (=−×

=

2)(lengthl

2)(lengthl

2l1l 3l

)( timetrackingl −4l

LU

Page 37: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

34

4. Geology

The line is located in the middle and lower reaches of IndusRiver. Karachi - Kotri

section belongs to the Arabian Sea coastal plain and is of flat and open terrain; due to

drought, the surface is mainly the landscape of alluvial landform and semi - desert

with dotted grass as the vegetation, and is covered by light sand and silt which is more

than 20-30m thick and which witnesses no exposed bedrock. Kotri - Nawabshah

section traverses the downstream of Indus River where the stratum of the river delta is

featured by fine-grained silt, silt, fine sand, clay, etc. Then, the line meanders through

the flat and open alluvial plain via Sukkur, Multan, Sahiwal, Lahore, Rawalpindi

where the stratum is characterized by a surface layer of silt and clay. A subsequent

layer of fine sand with mainly fine-grained particles and round gravel soil as well, and

a following layer of partial gravel soil. It all takes on the features of river sediments.

Rawalpindi, Islamabad, Havelian and Peshawar are located on the plains with shallow

hilly regions. Hills are round-shaped and of gentle slopes, parts of which witness

sporadic clay.

5.Route (Alignment)

This discussion includes upgrading of existing ML -1 only and the construction of a

new line between Karachi- Kotri/Hyderabad has not been included.

5.1 Main Technical Parameters

The entire track on ML -1, from Kiamari to Peshawar, Lodhran to Khanewal via

chord and Taxila to Havelian is categorized as Primary A, and is broad gauge, namely

1676 mm or 5 feet 6 inches. Only the 55 km Taxila -Havelian section would be single

line whereas the rest, measuring 1817 kilometers will be double track.

)/(1718

)706024( daypairstyLineCapaci =−×

=

Page 38: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

35

The double track between Kiamari and Lalamusa would have a design speed of 160

km/h for passenger trains whereas the double line section between Lalamusa to

Peshawar would be designed for speed of 120 km/h for passenger trains. The ruling

gradient for the entire line from Kiamari to Peshawar would be 10% or 1 in 100. The

ruling gradient for the Taxila - Havelian branch line section would be 20% or 1 in 50

and the single line track would facilitate trains operating at 120 km/h.

Main Technical Parameters

Item

Kiamari to Lalamusa Section

Lalamusa to

Peshawar Section

Taxila to Havelian Section

Track Double Line Double Line Single Line Designed speed for passenger

train

160km/h 120km/h 120km/h

Ruling grade 10‰ 10‰ 20‰

Minimum curve radius

2,000m (normal), 1,600m (difficult

sections)

1,200m (normal), 800m (difficult

sections)

1,200m (normal), 800m (difficult

sections) Clear

Straight Length (CSL)

700m for some stations with conditions allowed

Note: Initially diesel electric traction would be provided with the option of converting

to electric traction, after volumes of traffic justify the change. The locomotive would

be arranged as per operational requirements. Tractive tonnage or trailing load of a

freight train would be 3400 tons for all of ML -1, including the Taxila - Havelian

section.

On Kiamari - Peshawar section, the trains would be operated on Automatic Block

system whereas on Taxila -Havelian section they would operate on Semi - Automatic

Block system of signaling. The CSL would be 700 meters for some stations.

5.2 Engineering Sections of ML -1

Page 39: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

36

In the feasibility study report, the upgrading project of existing ML -1has been

divided into the following 14 segments for the convenience of the construction plan.

Estimated costs have been prepared separately for each segment.

S.N. Segment/Section Length

kms

Designed

Speed -

km/h

Time of

Completion

Remarks

1 Kiamari - Hyderabad 182 120 2017 Over hauling of existing

double track

2 Hyderabad - Multan 748 120 2017 Over hauling of existing

double track and

passenger facilities at

Rohri (Sukkur) and

Hyderabad station

3 Multan - Lahore 334 160 2017 Up gradation of existing

double line and

passenger facilities at

Lahore and Multan

stations

4 Havelian Dry Port 2017 Establish a dry port to

cater for China -

Pakistan trade on KKH

5 RailwayTraining

Academy, Lahore

2017 Capacity building of

human resource

6 Hyderabad - Multan 748 160 2020 Up gradation of existing

double line

7 Lahore - Lalamusa 132 160 2020 Up gradation and

construction of

additional line

8 Lalamusa- Peshawar 330 120 2017/2020 Up gradation,

construction of

additional line and

passenger facilities at

Rawalpindi and

Peshawar stations and

completion of Pindora -

Kaluwal section by Dec.

Page 40: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

37

2017.

9 Lodhran - Khanewal 91 160 2025 Up gradation and speed

acceleration to 160km/h

10 Taxila - Havelian 55 120 2020 Up gradation of existing

single line

11 Karachi -

Kotri/Hyderabad new

line

163 160 2025 Construction of a new

line

12 Electrification of ML -1 1872 2025 Based on traffic increase

13 Comprehensive

commercial

development of 8

stations

2025 Passenger facilitation

and commercial

exploitation of major

stations

14 Physical and academic

up gradation of Railway

Walton Academy,

Lahore

2025 Physical infrastructure of

the training academy

5.2Upgrading of Curves with Small Radius

The design principles of this feasibility study of ML -1 upgrading are: the minimum

radius of curves shall be 800m for sections to be upgraded to 120km/h running speed

of passenger trains; the minimum of radius of curves shall be 1600m for sections to be

upgraded to 160km running speed of passenger trains. Meanwhile, the demolition

quantity of upgrading, difficulty of works implementation, etc. should be

comprehensively considered. Under the condition of meeting requirements of speed

raising as possible, several sections with difficult upgrading will be provided with

speed restrictions. Recommendations for upgrading are finally proposed as follows.

The feasibility study considers to raise the running speed of passenger trains in

Kiamari-Lalamusa section of ML -1 to 160km/h, double the track of Lahore

-Lalamusa section, raise the running speed of passenger trains in Lalamusa-Peshawar

section to 120km/h and double the track of Lalamusa-Chaklala section and

Golra-Peshawar section.

Page 41: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

38

According to statistics, there are 195 places of ML -1 which don’t meet the conditions

of upgrading. This study plans to upgrade 154 places so that they can meet

requirements of upgrading. It is considered to provide speed-restriction for passenger

trains on the rest of the 41 places for the time being as they are located in the entrance

and exit ends of stations and in areas with concentrated city buildings. On Taxila -

Havelian branch line, there are 11 places which donot meet the conditions of

upgrading. Five of these places will be changed so as to meet the requirements of

upgrading whereas speed-restriction for passenger trains will be proposed for the rest

of the 6 places for the moment as they are located in the entrance and exit ends of

stations and areas with concentrated city buildings.

5.3Level Crossing

There are 747 existing level crossings along ML -1, including 495 manned ones and

252 unmanned ones. In view of the proposed up gradation in which speed will be

raised to 160 km/h on the Kiamari–Lalamusa and on Lodhran - Khanewal(chord)

sections, it would be against the principles of safety of train operations to allow any

infringement of the track.

For the safety of the travelling public and to avoid some major catastrophe in the

future it is advised to eliminate all level grade crossing on the up graded lines. The

roads should cross only through overhead bridges or under passes. At such high

speeds chances cannot be taken. Based on the traffic surveys of road and rail, the over

or under cross can be designed.

5.4 Fencing

After the existing line is upgraded to operate trains at 160 km/h, the entire track needs

to be isolated and fenced off so as to eliminate trespassing and accidents. For

Lalamusa - Peshawar section, where the speed would be raised to 120 km/h, fencing

would be provided only in congested urban areas to avoid trespassing.

Page 42: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

39

6.Track

Upgradation of the tracks of the existing ML -1and Havelian branch will be done,

which would involve replacement of rails, sleepers and fastenings that are beyond

repair. The ballast would be supplemented where ever found deficient. The total

quantities are stated as follows:

694 km of UIC60 rail is to be laid for the additional second line and upgraded

sections.2478km of UIC60 rail is to be replaced for the existing line.PSC sleepers are

to be laid for the additional second line and upgraded sections.The rail to sleeper

fastenings should be W14 type elastic fastening.

7.Sub-Grade

7.1 Sub-grade Defects

As shown in the investigation information, main defects of the sub-grade are

settlement, slope erosion and collapse and soaked sub-grade, and main defects of

sub-grade bed are ballast trough, frost boiling & mud emitting, settlement and

squeezing, shoulder deformation etc. Settlements are ubiquitous at the joints between

bridge and sub-grade.

During operation, drainage system will be treated for perfection; toe wall and side

slope protection measures will be prepared against defects to some extent. This line

has been built for a long time as well as the influence of climate, rising soil and

sub-grade settlement appeared along the line. All these factors will limit operation

speed, affect operational order and put the train at risk. Therefore, treatments on

sub-grade are required.

7.2Sub-grade Defects Treatment

Design principle of construction site renovation (or major defects) of existing

sub-grade is as follows:

Page 43: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

40

When shoulder level is restricted by the flood stage, comprehensive factors including

bridge and station shall be considered. The gradient shall be elevated as possible so as

to make the shoulder elevation to meet the design requirement. When gradient

uplifting is restricted, the surface of sub-grade bed shall be strengthened, such as

replacement of graded broken stone or medium-coarse sand and earthwork standard

room on the top of sub-grade bed surface, in order to improve the bearing capacity of

foundation soil and mitigate fine particle loss and ballast pollution below the

sub-grade bed surface. During the raining season, daily and necessary maintenance

shall be enhanced; train operation shall be decelerated or suspended if necessary.

Renovation design of sub-grade bed defect: strengthen drainage, excavate and replace

qualified filler and consolidate foundation for treatment.

The low embankment treatment of embankment height ≤0.6m: when mechanics index

of sub-grade surface of the existing line cannot satisfy the speed upgrading

requirement or no sub-grade bed surface section adopts excavation and

replacementmedium-coarse sand plus composite geo-membrane, then the bottom shall

adopt compaction pile of cemented soil for treatment.

Road and bridge transition section adopts cemented soil compaction pile for

reinforcement.

8. Land Utilization

Land utilization will be detailed in the preliminary design stage. At present, the land

distribution is estimated as follows:

Statistics of Administrative-District-Based Land Use Area

Speed-upgrading and Reconstruction of ML -1

Havelian Branch

Item (SIND) (PUNJAB) (KPK) (PUNJAB) (KPK)Sub Total

Page 44: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

41

Permanent land area for station & yard (hectare)

37.71 92.01 6.45 1.01 4.35 141.54

Temporary land area for station & yard (hectare)

19.00 53.23 3.75 1.19 4.55 81.73

Permanent land area for sections (hectare)

4.25 262.55 5.87 3.32 0.39 276.37

Temporary land area for sections (hectare)

5.93 387.19 2.86 0.98 1.26 398.22

9.Bridges& Culverts

Defects in bridge of existing ML -1 and Havelian branch line shall be treated. As for

the defected bridges unable to satisfy the speed upgrading requirement, temporary

reinforcement, demolition and reconstruction will be carried out so as to ensure

stability and safety of train operation. 727 sets of bridges (33,178 meters) are to be

built for the whole line; 196 sets of bridges, (4791 meters) are to be reinforced.

10. Tunnels

Lalamusa-Peshawar section of ML -1 line, which needs track doubling, speed

upgrading to 120km/h, and capacity expansion, is 330 km long.In the section, there

are 11 existing tunnels with a total length of 1340 meters, among which the longest

tunnel is 290meters long. The existing tunnels are located in Jhelum-Rawalpindi

section and Rawalpindi-Nowshera section. Six tunnels are located on curves, whose

radius are shorter than 500meters. The tunnels are structured in brickwork or

stonework, and are based on ballast track bed. The tunnels are over 100 years old and

none of the tunnels can meet the clearance requirement of electrification.

After comparison of different proposals on safety, economy and constructability,

double line is recommended. This proposal optimizes curve radius, adds two

double-track tunnels which meet the clearance requirement of electrified railway. The

total length of the two tunnels will be 2700m. The design speed of tunnel would be

120km/h with ballasted bed and CWR.

Page 45: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

42

11.Stations and Yards

The station & freight yards will be reconstructed on the basis of transportation

demand and signaling system installed. Stations tracks will be modified and

lengthenedto the Clear Straight Length (CSL)of 700 meters.

(1) Kiamari - Hyderabad section will be overhauled to maintain the existing track

parameters.There are 23 stations in this section. 440 sets of new turnouts and

24.976km new steel rails will be laid and 10.704km existing rails will be maintained.

But this section shall remain as it is for the time being and shall not be implemented

in 2017.

(2) Hyderabad-Multan section will be over hauled. This section has 68 stations,

among which 21 are closed and 47 are open to traffic. 682 sets of turnouts will be

overhauled and 68km route will be repaired.

(3) Hyderabad-Multan section will be upgraded for speeds of 160km/h for capacity

expansion. This section has 68 stations in total, among which 21 are closed and 47 are

open to traffic. 682 sets of new turnouts and 51km new steel rails with will be laid

whereas 22km existing rails will be maintained.

(4) Multan-Lahore section will be upgraded to 160km/h for capacity expansion. This

section has 37 stations in total, among which 13 are closed and 24 are open to traffic.

310 sets of new turnouts and 27 km new steel rails will be laid. 12 km existing rails

will be maintained.

(5) Lahore - Lalamusa section will be doubled and an additional line will be added

and upgraded to 160km/h for capacity expansion. This section has 16 stations in total,

among which 6 are closed and 10 are open to traffic. 153 sets of new turnouts and

10km new steel rails will be laid. 4km existing rails will be maintained.

(6) Lalamusa- Peshawar section will be doubled and upgraded to 120km/h for

capacity expansion. This section has 51 stations in total, among which 21 are closed

Page 46: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

43

and 30 are open to traffic. 431 sets of new turnouts and 33 km new steel rails will be

laid. 14 km existing rails will be maintained.Kaluwal - Pindora section of 52 km will

be constructed by December 2017.

(7) The existing single line of Lodhran- Khanewal section will be upgraded to

160km/h for capacity expansion. This section has 7 stations in total which are all open

to traffic. 75 sets of new turnouts and 11 km new steel rails will be laid.

(8) The existing single line of Havelian branch line will be upgraded to 120km/h. This

section has 7 stations in total, among which 2 stations are closed and 5 stations are

open to traffic. 30 sets of new turnouts and 7km new steel rails will be laid.

(9) New double line will be constructed from Karachi to Kotri. This section has 25

stations in total. 168 sets new turnouts and 69 km new steel rails will be laid.

(10) New Dry Port will be constructed at Havelian. One broad-gauge freight yard will

be built. One standard-gauge yard is proposed in the future. 44 sets of new turnouts

and 11km new steel rails will be laid.

12.Locomotive Maintenance Equipment

12.1Maintenance Facilities

The existing locomotive maintenance and over hauling facilities atKarachi, Lahore

and Rawalpindi will be up graded.

12.2 Proposed Locomotive Quantity

According to the traffic forecast and transportation plan,about 300 locomotiveswould

be required to operate trains on the up graded railway. PR already has a fleet of 452,

out of which more than 200 are in use on passenger and freight trains. Moreover, PR

has plans to procure new locomotives from other sources. As such, it would be

appropriate to allocate 50 locomotives,of a minimum of 4000 hp each,for the project.

Some of the locomotives would be required as early as 2017 to operate trains at speed

of 160 km/h on Lahore - Multan and Karachi - Hyderabad sections.

Page 47: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

44

13.Carriage& Wagons (Car) Maintenance Equipment

13.1 Maintenance Facilities

Rolling stock equipment in six (6) passenger coaching sick lines and washing lines

and 8 freight wagon depot (point) will be made up and reinforced, such as, 24 tons

lifting jack, air compressor, electrical welding machine, crane, under-floor wheel lathe

etc.

13.2Proposed Coaches and Wagons Quantity

According to the transportation plan based on the traffic forecast for passenger and

freight, about 300 passenger coaches and 2000 freight wagons would be provided.

14.Water Supply and Drainage

There are 7 water supply stations for passenger trains and 151 existing water supply

stations within the scope of this study. During the reconstruction, the new water point

would be connected to the existing pipe line and the sewage would be discharged into

the existing sewage network. As for the water supply & drainage facilities, stations

which cannot satisfy the requirement, the system will be strengthened.

15.Telecommunication

The existing telecommunication system being used by PR is obsolete and would be

unable to facilitate the train operations on the up graded system. As such, latest

technology would be adopted for telecommunications and the transmission system

would have trunk layer using SDH STM-16 MSTP, the section layer using SDH

STM-4 transmission system. The telephone switching system would comprise VOIP

telephone system; dividing the whole line into 6 telephone sections and install one set

of three-layer switching system at each center node.According to operational and

functional requirements, the project will be provided with new GSM-R digital trunk

mobile communication system.

Page 48: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

45

16.Signaling System

Reconstruction of communications and signaling systems at 31 stations between

Lodhran and Shahdara and 21 stations between Tando Adam and Mirpur Mathelo is

underway. For the purpose of the project, three-aspect automatic block between

Lodhran and Shahdara is considered, utilizing existing signaling equipment at the

above 52 stations. New CTCs at Lodhran-Shahdara section as well as the new CTCs

and automatic block equipment at Tando Adam - Mirpur Mathelo section require

interconnection with the interface of the existing signaling system.

Appropriate signaling system will be provided according to the required speed and the

signaling system would include Computer Based Interlocking (CBI) with Centralized

Traffic control (CTC), and Auto Train Protection (ATP). The Main Design Principle

and Technical Standards would be:

i. The signaling system and devices related to traffic safety shall conform to the

fail-safe principle.

ii. The main technical standards would be BS EN 50126: Railway Applications—The

specification and demonstration of reliability, availability, maintainability and safety

(RAMS);BS EN 50128: Railway Applications—Communications, signalingand

processing systems; BS EN 50129: Safety related electronic systems for signaling.

17.Power Supply

Each station will be provided with 11/0.4kv box-type substation(indoor substation is

set in heavy-load station) and diesel generators.Main source of first class load of

stations such as signal and communication are taken from local power supply, and

backup power comes from diesel generators. If there is no local power supply or local

power supply is far away, the power can be introduced from adjacent stations.

18.Comprehensive Inspection and Maintenance

To ensure proper maintenance and up keep of the equipment installed on ML -1, it is

Page 49: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

46

proposed to have maintenance and inspections units along the line. The main purpose

of these units would be to regularly inspect and maintain relevant equipment

pertaining to track, communication, signal, electricity, water supply and drainage and

other disciplines.

For track maintenance, one major machinery maintenance unit each will be based in

Kotri, Lodhran and Lalamusa station comprising roadbed stability car, ballast

supplementing and shaping car, tamping car and other auxiliary cars. In maintenance

section, rail-guided vehicle, lorry-mounted crane and minor maintenance and testing

equipment will also be made available.

19. Buildings

The guiding principle of facilitating station buildings would be to make use of

existing station buildings and increase new necessary equipment rooms. For capacity

expansion reconstruction of Karachi-Peshawar section of ML -1 and Havelian branch

line buildings will be provided for 3 track maintenance divisions, 21 track workshops

and 94 track maintenance sections. The buildings would be approximately 147,145m2.

20.Environmental Protection

20.1 Environmental Baseline Profile

The affected environment was assessed based on physical, biological and

socio-economic attributes of three provinces, namely, Punjab, Sindh and KPK. The

ML -1 route runs through a variety of terrains including rugged mountainous

topography, gently sloping valley side slopes and nearly horizontal valley flats, and

vast plains. The physical attributes include geology & soil, topography, land-use,

climate, natural hazards, surface water resources, ground water resources, ambient air

and noise. The biological environment was studied under the heading of flora and

fauna. The socio-economic environment was assessed by the administrative setup,

social characteristics, demographic characteristics of the respondents, religious &

ethnic composition of the population, housing pattern & family structure and other

socio-economic features.

Page 50: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

47

20.2 Public Consultation

The consultation process was carried out in accordance with the requirements of

Pakistan Environmental Procedures. The objectives of this process were to share

information with stakeholders on the construction of the proposed project, to

understand stakeholders’ concerns regarding various aspects of the project, to

understand the perceptions, assessment of social impacts and concerns of the affected

people/communities in the near vicinity of the proposed project; to provide an

opportunity to the public to provide valuable suggestions in the project design; and

reduce the chances of conflict through the early identification of controversial issues,

and consult them to find acceptable solutions.

20.3 Impacts and Mitigation Measures

The main impacts predicted in the construction phase were soil contamination,

construction camps/camp sites, social/cultural conflicts, health and safety issues, air

quality deterioration, noise and vibration, solid waste generation, surface and

groundwater contamination, effects on flora and fauna, disposal of mucking material,

disruption of existing public utilities, excavation and traffic management. Mitigation

measures/best management practices were proposed to avoid/reduce the potential

negative impacts during the construction phase.

20.4 Recommendations

The major impact of the project will be economic development in the region by

upgrading transport facility. Economic activity will be generated in the project area as

the laborers and semi-skilled staff will have an opportunity to work for the

construction of the proposed project. Most of the adverse impacts shall be short-term

and have local nature and are related to the construction process.

The recommendations for the ML -1 project were related to construction and

operation phases. These included strict implementation and follow-up of the

environmental management and monitoring plan, emergency preparedness and

Page 51: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

48

security of the laborers and staff.

21. Construction Organization Plan

21.1 Construction Period

Upgrading of existing line: 2 years (24 months); the total construction period is

temporarily set as 5 years (60 months).

Establishment of Havelian Dry Port: 2 years (24 months); and construction of

additional line between Kiamari and Kotri: 4 years (48 months).

21.2Total Construction Period

The construction period shall follow the already agreed time line as given above.

22. Cost Estimation

Section wise cost estimates are given in the table below:

The planned investment in the short term construction plan and follow-up

construction plan in accordance with the confirmation in JCC conference is as

follows:

S.N. Segment/Section Lengthkms

Designed Speed - km/h

Time of Completion Total Cost (USD)

1

Kiamari - Hyderabad (Up gradation of existing double line and passenger facilities at Karachi and Hyderabad stations)

182 160 2017 852,625,283

2

Hyderabad - Multan (Over hauling of existing double track and passenger facilities at Rohri (Sukkur) station)

748 110 2017 187,928,099

3

Multan - Lahore (Up gradation of existing double line and passenger facilities at Lahore and Multan stations)

334 160 2017 869,787,005

Page 52: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

49

S.N. Segment/Section Lengthkms

Designed Speed - km/h

Time of Completion Total Cost (USD)

4

Havelian Dry Port (Establish a dry port to cater for China - Pakistan trade on KKH)

2017 85,061,487

5

Railway Training Academy, Lahore (Capacity building of human resource)

2017 64,259,296

Locomotive & rolling stock procurement fee 2017 732,819,723

Phase I Total 2,792,480,893

6 Hyderabad - Multan (Up gradation of existing double line)

748 160 2020 2,328,524,333

7

Lahore - Lalamusa (Up gradation and construction of additional line)

132 160 2020 663,771,531

8

Lalamusa- Peshawar (Up gradation and construction of additional line and passenger facilities at Rawalpindi and Peshawar stations)

330 120 2020 1,461,080,749

9.

Lodhran - Khanewal (Up gradation and construction of additional line)

91 160 2025 166,917,602

10. Taxila - Havelian (Up gradation of existing single line)

55 120 2020 151,815,104

11. Karachi - Kotri/Hyderabad new line (Construction of a new line)

163 160 2025 522,379,225

12. Electrification of ML -1 (Based on traffic increase) 1872 2030 1,984,314,736

13

Comprehensive commercial development of 8 stations (Passenger facilitation and commercial exploitation of major stations)

2030 + 2,132,240,198

14 Physical infrastructure of the training academy 2025 71,316,564

The planned investment in the short term construction plan and follow-upconstruction

plan which the Pakistani side proposed is as follows:

S.N. Segment/Section Length kms

Designed speed - km/h

Time of Completion

Total cost ( USD)

Page 53: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

50

1.

Multan - Lahore (Up gradation of existing double line and passenger facilities at Lahore and Multan stations)

334 160 2017 869,787,005

2.

Hyderabad - Multan (Over hauling of existing double track and passenger facilities at Rohri (Sukkur) and Hyderabad station)

748 110 2017 187,928,099

3

Kiamari - Hyderabad Section(Overhaul of track and civil works, including up gradation of passenger facilities at Karachi Cantt. station)

182 110 2017 93,167,000

4

Peshawar - Rawalpindi (Up gradation and construction of additional line and passenger facilities of Rawalpindi and Peshawar stations.)

159 120 2017 715,630,000

5

Kaluwal - Pindora (construction work of realignment and doubling of track)

52 120 2017 239,760,000

6

Havelian Dry Port (Establish a dry port to cater for China - Pakistan trade on KKH)

2017 85,061,487

7

Pakistan Railway Academy Walton, Lahore (Capacity building of human resource)

2017 64,259,296

8 Locomotive & rolling stock procurement fee 2017 732,819,723

Phase I Total 2,988,412,610

9 Hyderabad - Multan (Up gradation of existing double line)

748 160 2020 2,328,524,333

10

Lahore - Lalamusa (Up gradation and construction of additional line)

132 160 2020 663,771,531

11 Lodhran - Khanewal (Up gradation of existing single line)

91 160 2025 166,917,602

12 Taxila - Havelian (Up gradation of existing single line)

55 120 2020 151,815,104

13 Karachi - Kotri/Hyderabad new line (Construction of a new line)

163 160 2020 522,379,225

14

Lalamusa- Rawalpindi, except the completion of Kaluwal - Pindora line by December, 2017. (Up gradation and

119 120 2020 505,690,749

Page 54: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

51

construction of additional line)

15 Electrification of ML -1 (Based on traffic increase) 1872 2025 1,984,314,736

16

Comprehensive commercial development of 8 stations (Passenger facilitation and commercial exploitation of major stations)

2025 2,132,240,198

17 Physical infrastructure of the training academy 2025 71,316,564

Note: PR suggests that the section from Karachi to Kotri should be overhauled.

23. Economic Assessment

Economical assessment on existing line rehabilitation of ML -1 and Havelian branch

line. The economical assessment of dry port and new freight line has been stated in

other documents.

23.1Economical Assessment on Existing Line Rehabilitation

As for fund raising, capital is set as 15% temporarily, and the rest 85% is tentatively

considered to be borrowed from Policy-related bank, and the loan interest rate is

considered as 3% temporarily. For revenue generation of the project it has been

assumed that the rate would be 0.04 USD /ton-km for freight transportation and

0.0185 USD /person-km for passenger. This is based on PR's current fare and freight

structure.

Index of Financial Assessment

S.N. Name of indicator Result Remarks

1 Pre-tax FIRR for total investment 9.22%

2 After-tax FIRR for total investment 7.69%

3 Pre-tax FNPV for total investment (million USD) 1,946

4 After-tax FNPV for total investment (million USD) 888

5 Pre-tax payback period of total investment (year) 14.11 Including construction

period

6 After-tax payback period of total investment (year) 14.09 Including construction

period 7 Average return on investment 6.30%

Page 55: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

52

Note: 

As shown by the financial evaluation index, FIRR of all investment is 9.22% (pre-tax)

and7.69% (after tax), NPV of the Project is 1,946 million USD (pre-tax) and 888

million USD (aftertax), and the financial benefit is good.

24.Study for Establishment of New Dry Port

In accordance with Pakistan Railways’ program, it plans to establish a dry port near

Havelian station. The key commodities to be handled by the dry port would be

machinery and equipment, minerals, electronic products, building materials, cotton

textile, agricultural and sideline products, all kinds of industrial products (chemical)

and petrochemical energy in the long term. Dry port is connected with existing

railway network of Pakistan and the Karakoram Highway connecting China and

Pakistan. Freight volume of the dry port would be generated by road as well as

railways.

The dry port would be handling goods brought in by road from China and also

material meant for transportation to China. The rail connectivity would provide an

opportunity to the Chinese business to make use of PR network for import and export

through the ports at Karachi and Gwadar in the future. The dry port facility would be

customs bonded area and would have a broad-gauge yard and goods yard of

663,150m2 and reserved standard-gauge yard for long term of 425,110m2, totaling

1,088,260m2.

25. New Line between Karachi and Kotri/Hyderabad

Kiamari - Hyderabad section is a critical link of the PR network where no alternate

routes are available for diversion of the existing train operations. From traffic point of

view, both freight and passenger, this section is frequently utilized. Presently, nineteen

(19) pairs of mail/express trains and about ten (10) pairs of freight trains, run on the

section every day. In view of the topography of the terrain, complicated track

geometry and ground realities, it is a difficult section to be upgraded to higher speeds

of 160 km/h. Moreover, major realignment works would also be required during up

Page 56: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

53

gradation resulting in serious disruption of train operations.

In view of the position explained above and to avoid major setback to train operations

and inconvenience to the travelling public, it is proposed that the work on Kiamari -

Hyderabad Section (182 km) for up gradation and speeding up to 160 km/h should be

deferred for the time being. It is further proposed that construction of the new Karachi

- Hyderabad track may be initiated in Short Term, Phase II rather than Medium Term.

Once this line is completed, the passenger trains will be shifted to the new line

whereas the existing line will be dedicated for freight traffic, due to its connectivity to

KPT and Port Qasim and marshalling yards at Pipri, Kiamari and oil terminals.

Instead of up gradation of existing Kiamari- Hyderabad section in Phase I, it would be

appropriate to initiate work on the doubling of Peshawar - Lalamusa segment, starting

work from Peshawar end. To facilitate reduction in transit time of trains between

Lahore - Rawalpindi - Peshawar, priority should be given to realignment of 52 -

kilometer long, Pindora - Kaluwal section, located on Peshawar - Lalamusa segment.

26. Railway Walton Academy Upgrading Project

Training and capacity building is considered as important as up gradation of the

railway infrastructure and no development can be sustainable if the human resource is

not trained to handle the changes. The Pakistan Railways Walton Academy at Lahore

shall be up graded and additional facilities and buildings will be added so as to

facilitate capacity building of the staff. The railway academy already has many

professional courses on railway operation management and maintenance. However,

modules of different disciplines will be added in view of the new technological

advancement in railways and international best practices now in vogue.

A new building complex comprising classrooms, administrative office, library and

technology research and development center and anew practical training building,

including professional classroom, comprehensive classroom and equipment room,

would be constructed. The up gradation would include an activity center, including

gym, small indoor activity room and canteen; a students' dormitory, stadium, with a

football field and two basketball courts. The existing hospital and electric power

Page 57: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

54

station would be upgraded.

27. Integrated Development of 8 Stations

Under take comprehensive development of seven railway stations on ML -1,

including Karachi, Hyderabad, Rohri (Sukkur), Multan, Lahore, Rawalpindi and

Peshawar. Quetta station which is not on ML -1 but is a provincial head quarter

station in Baluchistan and also a divisional headquarter of Pakistan Railway will also

be developed. Construct urban landmark buildings, and complete urban 24-hour

commercial complex with office, accommodation and commerce together.

Center on the railway stations, conduct a comprehensive and dense development of

commerce, office building and apartment, narrow the accommodation and

employment within the range of stations, maximize the land value, strive to improve

the value of surrounding land, attract other transportation modes and finally form the

transportation, financial, office and commercial core economic area centered on the

railway station.

28.Electrification/ Electric Traction

Electrification will be achieved in long term, based on the forecasted demand of

traffic volume.The whole line adopts direct feeding system with single-phase

industrial frequency 25kV AC and return wire. For newly-built traction substation,

three-phase Vv traction transformer with fixed reservation system is preferred.

OCS power supply and operating mode adopt in-phase one-way power supply.

Parallel-connection capacitance compensation device will be set for the phase

splitting of newly-built traction substation. Full-compensation simple-chain catenary

is adopted for OCS. Substation will be made use of the exiting and 57 numbers 132kV

traction substation will be newly built.

29. Conclusion

ML -1 is the life line of Pakistan Railways and is a vital aspect of the National Trade

Corridor of Pakistan. With the recent introduction of the CPEC concept, its

Page 58: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

55

importance has increased. It is expected that it would facilitate the growth of the

economy and boost trade and commerce between Pakistan and China in the future and

also facilitate regional connectivity to the neighboring countries and Central Asian

states.

Unfortunately the railway network had been neglected in the past and PR could not

play its due role in ensuring the safe, efficient and speedy movement of people and

goods in Pakistan. It was therefore, necessary to upgrade the entire railway network of

Pakistan, starting with ML -1. The detailed feasibility study of ML -1 reflects that the

project is not only necessary for the smooth and efficient movement of people and

goods in the National Corridor, a robust railway network is also essentially required

for regional connectivity. The project, if implemented in totality, would be financially

and economically viable and would definitely affect the cost of doing business in a

positive manner.

Page 59: ML1 Feasibility Study Executive Summary

56

Appendix:

Suggested Next Steps:

1. Submission of PC1 by Consultant to GOP - 5th, February, 2016

2.Submission of feasibility reports to National Development and Reform Commission

(NDRC) and National Railway Administration (NRA) of China by Ms CREEC - 5th,

February, 2016

3.Preparation and signing of Framework Agreement between the People’s Republic of

China and Islamic Republic of Pakistan - End of February, 2016

4.CRECC to assist in obtaining financing from relevant Chinese financial institutions

- End of August, 2016

5.Process for appointment of Consultant for preliminary design - Mid March, 2016

6.Appointment of Consultant for preliminary design and starting work - End March,

2016.CREEC expresses its willingness to do the preliminary design.

7.Complete preliminary design of ShortTerm Phase I Projects - August 2016

8.Process for appointment of EPC contractor - End August 2016

9.Start of construction work - End September, 2016