Upload
garry-farmer
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MODELING OF SUDDEN HYDROGEN EXPANSION FROM CRYOGENIC PRESSURE VESSEL FAILURE
Guillaume Petitpas and Salvador M. Aceves
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory7000 East Avenue, L-792Livermore, CA 94550USA
ID#: 253
September 12-14, 2011SAN FRANCISCO, USA
2
Cryogenic pressure vessels can store hydrogen at low temperatures with minimum evaporative losses
Low heat transfer obtained with “vessel within a vessel” design
•Conduction: composite supports•Convection: vacuum pressure < 1mTorr•Radiation: MLI
3
Thermodynamic advantages of cryogenic pressure vessels drive superior weight, volume and cost
Source: TIAXSource: Argonne National Lab (Ahluwalia et al.),AMR 2011
4
Cryogenic pressure vessels’ low operating temperature reduces expansion energy
5
High Pressure VesselMOP: 350 bar
Operating T: 20.3 to 300 K
Scenario: sudden hydrogen expansion resulting from accidental pressure vessel failure
Vacuum shell
Rupture DiscsBurst pressure: 1.5 bar (relative)
6
High Pressure Vessel
Scenario: sudden hydrogen expansion resulting from accidental pressure vessel failure
Vacuum shell
Rupture Discs
Pressure vessel initially full (H2 density between 28 and 70 g/L)
7
High Pressure Vessel
Scenario: sudden hydrogen expansion resulting from accidental pressure vessel failure
Vacuum shell
Rupture Discs
At t=0 s, an accidental failure happens
8
High Pressure Vessel
Scenario: sudden hydrogen expansion resulting from accidental pressure vessel failure
Vacuum shell
Rupture Discs
Hydrogen starts flowing into the vacuum shell through a 7.62 mm diameter opening (penetration test FMVSS 304)
9
High Pressure Vessel
Scenario: sudden hydrogen expansion resulting from accidental pressure vessel failure
Vacuum shell
Rupture Discs
When the pressure in the vacuum shell reaches 1.5 bar, the rupture discs break and H2 flows in the atmosphere
10
Governing equations
• Adiabatic release: no heat transfer between gas and containers
• Orifices at choked condition throughout the process, no slip
• Expansion takes place in small region near the orifice, modeled by a quasi 1D isentropic flow
• Real gas behavior, using REFPROP Version 8.0
• Calculation ends when vacuum shell reaches atmospheric pressure
We have developed a transient H2 release model
11Initial conditions in the vessel : 350 bar, 300 K
Choked flow for a single vessel is determined using initial stagnation state, assuming isentropic flow
ThroatPt, Tt, st=s
VesselP,T,s
At maximum flow rate, M=1 (velocity=
local speed of sound)
12
Thermodynamic state at the throat can be “mapped” for different initial vessel conditions
13
Step 1: Determine choked conditions at the throat for stagnation state down to 0.7*Tc
14Hydrogen release from 350 bar, 300 K
Step 2: Apply those calculations to the accidental release of H2 in a cryogenic pressure vessel
15
Results indicate that a vessel initially at room temperature does not experience phase change
Hydrogen release from 350 bar, 300 K
16
H2 initially at cryogenic temperature depressurizes faster, phase change occurs in the pressure vessel
Hydrogen release from 350 bar, 62 K (70 g/L)
17
Vent pressure is ~10X lower for cryogenic vessels vs. room temperature compressed gas vessel
18
Vent energy is 10X lower for cryogenic vesselsvs. room temperature compressed gas vessel
Energy released in 1 second:
Room Temp150 Wh/kgH2
Cryogenic15 Wh/kgH2
19
SummaryWe have modeled 2-phase
choking states down to 0.7*Tc
Choked flow model has been applied to accidental release from “vessel within a vessel” cryogenic storage
Vent energy and pressure from cryogenic pressure vessel failure is 10 times lower than for compressed gas tanks, reducing hazards to surrounding people and property