17
Modelling dynamics of electrical responses in plants Sanmitra Ghosh Supervisor: Dr Srinandan Dasmahapatra & Dr Koushik Maharatna Electronics and Software Systems, School of Electronics & Computer Science University of Southampton 1

Modelling dynamics of electrical responses in plants

  • Upload
    tao

  • View
    49

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Modelling dynamics of electrical responses in plants. Sanmitra Ghosh Supervisor: Dr Srinandan Dasmahapatra & Dr Koushik Maharatna Electronics and Software Systems, School of Electronics & Computer Science University of Southampton. Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Modelling  dynamics of  electrical responses in plants

Modelling dynamics of electrical responses in plantsSanmitra Ghosh

Supervisor: Dr Srinandan Dasmahapatra & Dr Koushik Maharatna

Electronics and Software Systems,School of Electronics & Computer Science

University of Southampton

Page 2: Modelling  dynamics of  electrical responses in plants

2

OutlineIntroductionBlack Box models (System Identification)Modelling plant responses as ODEsCalibration of Models (Parameter Estimation

in ODE using ABC-SMC)ABC-SMC using Gaussian processesFuture workReferences

Page 3: Modelling  dynamics of  electrical responses in plants

3

IntroductionExperiments

Models ???

Page 4: Modelling  dynamics of  electrical responses in plants

4

IntroductionTypical electrical responses

Light

Ozone (sprayed for 2 minutes)

Page 5: Modelling  dynamics of  electrical responses in plants

5

Black Box models

1 11

1 1

( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )B q C qA q y t u t e tF q D q

Generalized least-square estimator {A,B,F,C,D} are rational polynomials

1

1

( )( )C qD q

1

1

( )( )B qF q

1

1( )A q

( )e t

( )y t( )u t

Linear estimator

Page 6: Modelling  dynamics of  electrical responses in plants

6

Black Box models

Linear BlockInput Nonlinearity

Output Nonlinearity

fBF h

( )u t ( )w t ( )x t ( )y t

Nonlinear Hammerstein-Wiener model structure

1

1

( )( ) ( ( ( )))( )pB qy t h f u tF q

2

1

( ( ) ( ))N

N p mt

V y t y t

System output

Cost function

This cost function is minimized using optimization

Page 7: Modelling  dynamics of  electrical responses in plants

Black Box models

Page 8: Modelling  dynamics of  electrical responses in plants

8

Modelling responses as ODEs

Proposed model:

(t) models a latent stimulus (v) is a chosen non-linear function of voltage V(t)

𝑑𝐼𝑑𝑡=−𝜇 𝐼

𝑑𝑉𝑑𝑡 =𝐼+ 𝑓 (𝑣)

2 4 6 8 10

4.05

4.10

4.15

4.20

time

Voltage

Page 9: Modelling  dynamics of  electrical responses in plants

9

Modelling responses as ODEs

(v) is chosen as Micheles-Menten (sigmoidal) and Fitzhugh-Nagumo (cubic) type non-linear function of v(t) (voltage)

Page 10: Modelling  dynamics of  electrical responses in plants

10

ABC

𝑝 (𝜃∨𝑦 )≈1( ∆( 𝑦 , 𝑥 ) ≤ 𝜀¿ 𝑓 ( x |𝜃 ) π ( θ )

Approximate Bayesian Computation

Prior

Likelihoodposterior

Page 11: Modelling  dynamics of  electrical responses in plants

11

ABC

ABC Rejection Sampler (Pickard, 1999)

1. Given , π(θ), (x|) 2. Sample a parameter ∗ from the prior

distribution π().

3. Simulate a dataset x from model (x| ∗) with parameter θ .∗

4. if ∆(, ) ≤ then

5. Accept ∗ otherwise reject.

Note: to generate data x from model (x| ∗) we have to solve the ODE

Page 12: Modelling  dynamics of  electrical responses in plants

12

ABC

ABC-Sequential Monte Carlo (Toni et al, 1999) …

Limitation: extremely slow due to large number of explicit ODE solving for generating simulated data

Page 13: Modelling  dynamics of  electrical responses in plants

13

ABC

Data

Gaussian Process

== + noise

𝑑 X̂ ( t )𝑑𝑡  

The Gaussian process trick

Page 14: Modelling  dynamics of  electrical responses in plants

14

ABC

Page 15: Modelling  dynamics of  electrical responses in plants

15

ABCPredator-Pray a b

generated 2.10

2.10

estimated (ABC-SMC) 2.10

2.07

estimated (ABC-SMC-GPDist)

2.10

2.06

Fitzhugh-Nagumo a b c

generated 0.20 0.20 3.00

estimated (ABC-SMC) 0.19 0.20 2.97

estimated (ABC-SMC-GPDist)

0.21 0.22 2.62

Mackay-Glass β n γ τ

generated 2.00 9.65 1.00 2.00

estimated (ABC-SMC) 2.07 9.42 1.03 2.01

estimated (ABC-SMC-GPDist)

2.04 9.16 1.00 2.04

Page 16: Modelling  dynamics of  electrical responses in plants

16

Future workModel needs to be extended to capture the

variability seen among different electrical responses.

More models are required to represent other stimuli.

Page 17: Modelling  dynamics of  electrical responses in plants

17

References1. J K Pritchard, M T Seielstad, a Perez-Lezaun, and M W Feldman. Population growth of human Y chromosomes: a study of Y chromosome microsatellites. Mol. Biol. Evol., 16(12):1791–8, December 1999.

2. T. Toni, D. Welch, N. Strelkowa, a. Ipsen, and M. P.H Stumpf. Approximate Bayesian computation scheme for parameter inference and model selection in dynamical systems. J. R. Soc. Interface, 6(31):187–202, February 2009.