35
Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmia Denis Noble University of Oxford Basel Computational Biology Conference From Information to Simulation 19 March 2004

Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Modelling repolarization andre-entrant arrhythmia

Denis NobleUniversity of Oxford

Basel Computational Biology ConferenceFrom Information to Simulation

19 March 2004

Page 2: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

The problem: drug-induced QT prolongation

Major regulatory concern in drug developmentImpacts all therapeutic drug classesResponsible for nearly half of US FDA safety-based drug withdrawals since 1998Frequent cause of clinical holds, NDA withdrawals, delays in approval, and restricted labeling

Page 3: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Challenges in predicting QT safety

No surrogate for the human heartNo fully predictive pre-clinical assayLarge number of experimental variables Effects of genetics, disease difficult to reproduce experimentally

Danger of false positives or false negativesTime and resource expenditures very significantMarkers not conclusions

Page 4: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

This presentation will deal with

Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration)

Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Related arrhythmic indicators

Where do we go after S7B (Draft Consensus Guideline)?

Page 2 “The development of new technologies and methodologies is encouraged”– I will ask how far modelling has got and where it could go.

Page 6 “Evidence for repolarization impairment in nonclinical studies should not, however, preclude development of the candidate pharmaceutical”– I will illustrate such a case.

Page 21 “however, modelling of the clinical condition where pharmaceuticals elicit arrhythmia is complicated”– I will show that, while complicated, it is possible

Page 5: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Origin of the problem

Discovery of cardiac K+ channels1960

Page 6: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

1960 : analysis of K+ channels in the heart

-25-50-75-100mV

1

2

-1

-2

current

IK1

IK

Replotted from Hall, Hutter & Noble, 1963Journal of Physiology, 166, 225-240

Page 7: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Model Construction 1960

INa

IK1IK

ICl

Purkinje fibre Channels

Page 8: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Noble, 1960Nature 188, 495-497

Page 9: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Nature’s pact with the devil:

1. The good news

The inward rectifier potassium currentiK1 (Kir2.x)

guarantees energy conservation

Page 10: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Nature’s pact with the devil:

2. The bad news

The delayed potassium currentiKr (HERG +)

is highly promiscuous

Page 11: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Model Construction 2000

INa

IClIK1 IK Ito

ICaChannels

I Na/KI NaCa Na/H Na/HCO3 Cl/OH Cl/HCO3

Carriers

Ca

pH

ATP

Glucose

Fatty Acids

Amino Acids

H/Lactate

SubstratesAng II 1 2

NO

ß M

Receptors

Page 12: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms
Page 13: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Human cell model

TEN TUSSCHER, K. H. W. J., NOBLE, D., NOBLE, P. J. & PANFILOV, A. V. (2003).

A model of the human ventricular myocyte.American Journal of Physiology

(published on-line December 4)

Detailed channel, transporter and SR equations,but computationally very efficient

Page 14: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Human cell modelThe model includes regional expression differences.

Page 15: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Human cell modelComparison with Priebe-Beuckelman 1998Slower recovery of conduction velocity, as seen experimentally

Page 16: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Human ventricular cell model

Membrane potential

iK1

iKr

mV

seconds

Page 17: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Human ventricular cell modelClass III induced EAD

[K]o reduced from 5.4 mM to 2.7 mMThen iKr blocked by 90%

mV

seconds

[K]o reduced

iKr blocked by 90%

Page 18: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Genetically-inducedRepolarization failure

Mutations in various ionic channels can predispose to repolarization failure

This simulation is of a sodium channelmis-sense mutation responsible foridiopathic ventricular fibrillation

Page 19: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Sodium channel molecular structureFour transmembrane domains each with six subunits

Page 20: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Heart sodium channel mutationsgreen : IVF mutations red : long QT mutations

(Chen et al, Nature, 19 March 1998)

Page 21: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Expressed sodium channel kinetics(Chen et al, Nature, 19 March 1998)

Page 22: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Computer model prediction

• Sodium channel missense mutation• 12 and 18 mV voltage shifts• Using digital cell ventricular model

12 mVshift18 mVshift

Page 23: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

This approach has now been used for a substantial number of gene manipulations in heart cells and can account for genetic susceptibility to fatal cardiac arrhythmia

Including interactions with drugs causing long QT and arrhythmia in clinical trials

Genetic typing to screen out those susceptible to drugs causingQT problems is therefore a foreseeable possibility

Noble D (2002) Unravelling the genetics and mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 5755-6

Unravelling genetics of arrhythmia

Page 24: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

block of iKr

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

0 500 1000 1500 2000seconds

mem

bran

e po

tent

ial (

mV

)

normal action potentials

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

0 500 1000 1500seconds

mem

bran

e po

tent

ial (

mV

)

'mutation'

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

0 500 1000 1500 2000

seconds

mem

bran

e po

tent

ial (

mV

)

iKr block + 'mutation'

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

0 500 1000 1500 2000seconds

Drug-gene interaction

Threshold for EADs = 23 mV Threshold for EADs = 17 mV

NOBLE, D. (2003). Will Genomics revolutionise pharmaceutical research and development? Trends in Biotechnology 21, 333-337.

Page 25: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

This example shows

effect of 90% block of IK alone (pure class III)

effect of additional 20% block of Ica,L

Multiple site drugs:QT prolongation without arrhythmia?

Page 26: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

• Normal action potential• Block of IK alone• Partial block of ICaL

Page 27: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Re-entrant arrhythmia

Incorporation of cellular models into tissue and organ models

Page 28: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Re-entrant arrhythmia usinghuman cell model

Spiral wave in 600 x 600 2D lattice

TEN TUSSCHER, NOBLE, D., NOBLE, P. J. & PANFILOV (2003).

Page 29: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Noble D (2002) Modelling the heart: from genes to cells to the whole organ. Science 295, 1678-1682

Physiome Sciences

Page 30: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Conclusions

QT is a very poor marker – can be prolonged without arrhythmia – can be shortened with arrhythmia – all combinations are possible – hence the mess and confusion.

HERG also a poor marker – iKr block could be part of a multiple action therapeutic agent

Arrhythmia would be a better marker

Cellular mechanisms now well-established

Need therefore for systematic modeling of arrhythmic mechanisms at tissue and organ levels

This problem is soluble. LET’S DO IT!

Page 31: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms
Page 32: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

CardioPrism™ case study: Sex-based differences

D-Sotalol (SWORD trial):Trial resulted in loss of interesting compoundDisproportionate deaths of women

Women exhibit: a longer QT interval at baselinegreater response to QT prolonging drugs; increased risk of TdP

Experimental results from the late ’90s suggests reduced levels of two potassium channels in female hearts

Page 33: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

Epicardial cellEndocardial cell M-cell

Female: 15% reduction IKr + 13% reduction IK1BCL = 1000 msec

Male Female

CardioPrism™ Case Study:Sex-based differences

Page 34: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

100%

30%

70% 80% 90%

60%

40%50%

20% 10%

Amount of block

♥♥

♥♥

♥♥

♥ ♥

♥ ♥♥

Females Males

Females: First

irregularity at 50% block

Males: First irregularity

at 80% block

CardioPrismCardioPrism™™ Case Study:Case Study:Response to Response to IKrIKr block with sblock with sexex--based based differencesdifferences

Page 35: Modelling repolarization and re-entrant arrhythmiaThis presentation will deal with Physiological basis of QT interval (action potential duration) Simulation of repolarization mechanisms

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0.11 0.25 0.43 0.67 1.00 1.50 2.33 4.00 9.00

Female

Male

EAD

s)

Relative concentration (D/Kd)

CardioPrismCardioPrism™™ Case Study:Case Study:Females have lower threshold for drugFemales have lower threshold for drug--induced induced proarrhythmiaproarrhythmia