Upload
harriet-ferguson
View
224
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
GENERALIZED EFFECTS OF INDUSTRIAL
REVOLUTION• Increased Population• Increased Urbanization• Increased migration, immigration• Increased wealth• Spread of wealth to middle class• New consumerism• New roles for women, poor, minorities• Change in child rearing, childhood• Rise of a technical, managerial class• Invention of leisure time, common culture• Increasing demand for social reform, worker
rights• Increased life span, living standard;
decreased death rate• Emancipation of slaves, serfs
INDEPENDENCE IN LATIN AMERICA
• Latin American society rigidly hierarchical
– Social classes: peninsulares, creoles, mestizos, slaves, indigenous peoples
– Creoles sought to displace the peninsulares but retain their privileged position
– Mestizos form the largest part of population, wanted rights
INDEPENDENCE IN LATIN AMERICA
• Mexican independence – Napoleon's invasion of Spain in 1807
weakened royal control of colonies – 1810: peasant revolt in Mexico led by
Hidalgo, defeated by conservative creoles – 1821: Mexico briefly a military
dictatorship, then in 1822 a republic
INDEPENDENCE IN LATIN AMERICA
• Southern Viceroyalty of New Spain split into several independent states in 1830s
• Simon Bolivar to 1822– Led independence movement in South America – Inspired by George Washington, took arms
against Spanish rule in 1811
– Creole forces overcame Spanish armies throughout South America, 1824
– Bolivar's effort of creating the Gran Colombia failed in 1830s
• Jose de San Martin to 1825– Led independence movements in Bolivia,
Argentina, Chile– United efforts with Bolivar
• Brazilian independence – Portuguese royal court fled to Rio de Janeiro,
1807– Brazil declared a separate kingdom during exile – The king's son, Pedro, agreed to Brazilian
independence, 1821 – Became Emperor Pedro I in the independent
Brazil (reigned 1822-1834)
INDEPENDENCE IN LATIN AMERICA• Creole dominance in Latin
America – Independence brought little social
change in Latin America – Principal beneficiaries were creole
elites– Creole elite merged with
peninsulares to rule Latin America– Mestizos acquired some benefits,
Indians/blacks marginalized• Caribbean remained largely
under European control
WHAT TO DO AFTER INDEPENDENCE?
• Old Problems confront new realities– Leaders came from
Enlightenment: spoke of equality, freedom, BUT:• No allowance for freedom of religion• Slavery ended but not exploitation of
poor, Indians• Equality was too threatening to elite• Democracy uncommon, rich men
voted• Old color distinctions did not
disappear rapidly, easily, or at all– Political fragmentation
WHAT TO DO AFTER INDEPENDENCE?
• Political instability after independence – Creole leaders ruled but had little experience with self-
government • White minority dominated politics• Peasant majority was without power
– Political instability aggravated by division among elites– Constant argument between centralizing and
federalizing pressures• Conflicts between farmers, ranchers, indigenous
peoples common – Intense fighting in Argentina, Chile; modern weapons
against native peoples – Colonists had pacified most productive land by 1870s
• Caudillos, Caudillism, Politics and the Church– Military leaders who held power after revolutionary era
• Used military to seize power, stay in control; interested only in power for own sake
• Opposed liberalizing effects; often made alliances with aristocratic elites, land owners
– Ruled through the church and opposed an secularization, reform of society
WHAT TO DO AFTER INDEPENDENCE?
• Mexico: war and reform from 1821-1911 – Shifted from monarchy to republic to caudillo
rule – La Reforma: liberal movement in 1850s led by
President Benito Juarez – Granted universal male suffrage; limited
power of priests and military – Reforms strongly opposed by landowning
elites
LATIN AMERICAN DEPENDENCE• Colonial legacy
– Prevented industrialization – Spain, Portugal never
encouraged industries • Limited success at
industrialization – 1820 – 1850: Economic
Stagnation• Wars of independence had
disrupted economy• Most wealth tied to land,
agriculture• Export of primary, unfinished goods
especially guano, coffee, hides– Too many unsolved social
problems retarded industrialization
LATIN AMERICAN DEPENDENCE• Economic growth part of 2nd Industrial
Revolution – Change grew out of liberalizing effects,
reforms in late century• Entrepreneurs, intellectuals, landowners brought
in foreign investments• Facilitated by new technologies (railroads,
steamships)– Great Boom driven by exports
• Demand for rubber, copper, tin, silver, beef, bananas, oil, coffee, cocoa
• Capital intensive development of primary product exports
• Trade increased by almost 50% from 1870 – 1880• British initially preeminent; Germany and US
increasingly rivals for area– Mexico, Brazil, Argentina
• Society, infrastructure transformed by this Great Boom
• But wealth often in hands of foreigners, upper elite
• Growth was often at the expense of local interests, poor, minorities
• Liberal idealism often sold out to wealth of elite, profit
MEXICO IN MODERN ERA:INSTABILITY AND FOREIGN
INTERVENTION• Mexican Republic under Santa Anna
– Until his death dominated Mexico– Saw himself as a Latin Napoleon– Constantly in debt to foreigners– Revolt of Texas led to conflict with US
• Mexican American War 1846 – 1848– Mexico lost 1/3 of its territory– Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo– US expanded to Pacific and annexed Texas
MEXICO IN MODERN ERA:INSTABILITY AND FOREIGN
INTERVENTION• The French Intervention
– Benito Juarez • Liberal Indian President of Mexico• He started a liberal revolt• La Reforma which was powerful
– Conservatives turned to French for support• French troops land• French install an Austrian emperor on throne• Backed emperor with French troops, French money
– US demanded French withdrawal in 1867– Supply insurgents with arms; Juaristas win
• Diaz Era Dictatorship to 1910– Encouraged foreign investors – Built rails, telegraphs; developed mines, plantations– Country largely became property of American businesses – Mexican oligarchy and foreign investors got wealthy – Average Mexican standard of living declined; Indians
exploited
BRAZIL• Social and Gender
– 1750: Plantation casted society with minority whites, majority black population: slaves, poor rural
– Slave Trade, Slavery abolished in 1888 by decree of Princess Regent– 1888: Society with whites, blacks, mixed populations; remained
casted– Society dominated by the landed, generally white elite; poor rural
blacks were landless proletariat– Middle class began to grow in cities with rise of industry, export;
workers were Italian, immigrant• Cultural
– Ruling population thoroughly Europeanized; blacks retained many African traditions
– Catholicism is the only unifying force and it is a syncretic blend; many traditional African beliefs
• Technology– Railroads, steamboats, paddlewheelers opened up interior, united
Brazil– Development of some industries related to export, trade; Sao Paolo
rises as the industrial center • Environment and Demography
– Sugar economy gave way to coffee, cocoa plantations– Mining increased, gold rush to Minas Gerais; rubber boom in
Amazon led to mass immigration– Massive European immigration (laborers) especially Italians
LATIN AMERICAN SOCIETY• Latin American societies
– Organized by ethnicity and color, legacy of colonialism– European descendants dominate all aspects of state,
economic, social life– Europeanization of all aspects, classes, activities of
society – Bipolar society
• Male vs. Female• Elite vs. Masses• White vs. Colored• Urban vs. rural
• Castes– Legally abolished by revolutions but de jure is not de
facto– Stigma of color and former status prevented much
change– Liberal reforms, Positivism often sacrificed legal rights,
color for economic wealth, profit• Large-scale migration in nineteenth century brought
cultural diversity – Small number of Chinese in Cuba assimilated through
intermarriage – East Indians in Trinidad, Tobago preserved cultural
traditions – European migrants made Buenos Aires "the Paris of the
Americas“– Most cultural diverse society was Brazil with Europeans,
Blacks, Indians, mixed
LATIN AMERICAN SOCIETY• Male domination
– Central feature of Latin American society in nineteenth century
– Machismo: culture of male strength, aggression
• Women’s Rights– Women barred legally from any influence;
remained under nearest male’s influence– No significant women's movement– Aristocratic women more constrained
than lower classes– Poor women worked, often controlled
local markets– Efforts to improve education girls
increased opportunities for women (as teachers)