9
Monitoring and Monitoring and Evaluation Evaluation Frameworks Frameworks Kyiv, Ukraine Kyiv, Ukraine May 23, 2006 May 23, 2006 MEASURE Evaluation

Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks Kyiv, Ukraine May 23, 2006 MEASURE Evaluation

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks Kyiv, Ukraine May 23, 2006 MEASURE Evaluation

Monitoring and Monitoring and Evaluation FrameworksEvaluation Frameworks

Kyiv, UkraineKyiv, Ukraine

May 23, 2006May 23, 2006

MEASUREEvaluation

Page 2: Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks Kyiv, Ukraine May 23, 2006 MEASURE Evaluation

M&E FrameworksM&E Frameworks

►Models, pictures or mapsModels, pictures or maps

► Visualize the factors that drive an Visualize the factors that drive an

interventionintervention

►Maps that illustrate how a program Maps that illustrate how a program shouldshould

workwork

► Identify relationships between factors that Identify relationships between factors that

influence program operation and the influence program operation and the

successful achievement of objectivessuccessful achievement of objectives

Page 3: Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks Kyiv, Ukraine May 23, 2006 MEASURE Evaluation

Why do we use M&E Why do we use M&E frameworks?frameworks?

► Communication and planning toolCommunication and planning tool

► As a ‘map’ for program goalsAs a ‘map’ for program goals

► Links between resources and activities Links between resources and activities

► Guide selection of indicators Guide selection of indicators

Page 4: Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks Kyiv, Ukraine May 23, 2006 MEASURE Evaluation

MM&&E LE LOGICALOGICAL F FRAMEWORKSRAMEWORKS

Illustrate the relationships between program Inputs, Processes, Outputs, and Outcomes.

Links the program to desired Impact.

Page 5: Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks Kyiv, Ukraine May 23, 2006 MEASURE Evaluation

INPUT

Resources

Clinical and managerial Staff

Drugs

Laboratories

PROCESS

Management

Communication

Advocacy

Human resources development

Surveillance system

OUTPUT

Diagnostic services

Treatment services

Knowledge

Reduced Stigma

OUTCOME

Case detection

Case treatment

Case holding

IMPACT

TB infection

TB morbidity

TB mortality

CONTEXT

Political commitment Health system Socio-economic conditions Epi-context Availability HIV prevalence Access Malnutrition Utilization Alcoholism

M&E logical framework for TB programme

Page 6: Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks Kyiv, Ukraine May 23, 2006 MEASURE Evaluation

INPUT•Drugs

•Guidelines for DOT

•Human Resources

PROCESS•Training of HCWs

•Distribution of drugs

•Supervision

OUTPUT• HCWs trained

to provide DOT

• Drugs available at facilities

• Patients receiving DOT

• Treatment outcomes reported

OUTCOME•Cure and treatment completion rates

•Decreased failure and default rates

IMPACT• Morbidity/

mortality due to TB

• Prevention of MDR TB

Logic Framework example:

Directly Observed Therapy

Page 7: Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks Kyiv, Ukraine May 23, 2006 MEASURE Evaluation

Logic Framework

Input Input Process Process Output Output Outcome Outcome Impact Impact

Program Level Program Level Population Population levellevel

Page 8: Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks Kyiv, Ukraine May 23, 2006 MEASURE Evaluation

ConclusionConclusion

►Which program components should be Which program components should be monitored?monitored?

►Strategic and systematic planning of M&EStrategic and systematic planning of M&E

►Appropriate methodology for M&E Appropriate methodology for M&E activitiesactivities

► Indicator selectionIndicator selection

Page 9: Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks Kyiv, Ukraine May 23, 2006 MEASURE Evaluation

Logic Framework Group WorkLogic Framework Group Work

1. Read through the case study with your 1. Read through the case study with your assigned groupassigned group

2. Identify the goal, objectives and 2. Identify the goal, objectives and activities for addressing this problem and activities for addressing this problem and list them on form 1. Then use the logic list them on form 1. Then use the logic model on form 1 to identify key inputs, model on form 1 to identify key inputs, processes, outputs and outcomes. processes, outputs and outcomes.

3. Each group will report back to the larger 3. Each group will report back to the larger group on the draft framework/activity. group on the draft framework/activity.