Monitoringkonzeption aus Sicht der ... · 12. Magdeburger Gewässerschutzseminar – Oktober 2006 Monitoringkonzeption aus Sicht der Flussgebietsgemeinschaft Elbe im internationalen

12. Magdeburger Gewässerschutzseminar – Oktober 2006

Monitoringkonzeption aus Sicht der Flussgebietsgemeinschaft

Elbe im internationalen KontextKlaus-Dieter Liebau

(Vorsitzender des Koordinierungsrates der FGG Elbe)

Jörg Janning(Mitglied des Koordinierungsrates der FGG Elbe,

Vertreter der LAWA in der Strategischen Koordinierung der EU)


Environmental Objectives Art. 4

• „protect“: to prevent deterioration

• „enhance“: with the aim to achieve a good status for the aquatic ecosystems

0

1

2009 20212015 2027

WB

Janning, NI MU 24 06-04

EQR

HES

GES

unlikely

unclear

likely

unlikely

unclear

likely

2005 Art. 5 reportAssessment LikelyhoodEvironmental Objectives

very good

good

moderate

in-sufficient

bad

good

bad

2009 RBM PlanClassification

ecological status

chemical status

2003 ImPress analysisAssessment-matricesalong LAWA criteria

>70% WB-length fulfilled

30-70% … fulfilled

<30% … fulfilled

EG-QS fulfilled

no EG-QS yetfestgesetzt

EG-QS not fulfilled

„not at risk“

„at risk“

„not at risk“

„at risk“

2004designationAWB / prel. HMWB

< 30% WB-lengthstructure class >6


Article 8 of the Directive establishes the requirements for the monitoring of surface water status, groundwater status and protected areas.

Monitoring programmes are required to establish a coherent and comprehensive overview of water status within each river basin district.

The programmes have to be operational at the latest by 22 December 2006, and must be in accordance with the requirements of Annex V.

Three types of monitoring are described in Annex V: surveillance, operational and investigative monitoring.

Maps of the monitoring networks;Estimates of the confidence and precision attained by the monitoring systems.

Implementing Monitoring


Schematic diagram illustrating the relationship between Article 5 and Article 8 in the design of surface water monitoring programmes


Some initial Art. 5 results-water bodies-

No. of river water bodies per 1000 km2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

LV FR SIES SK NL HU CZ LT PL RO SE BE DE

UK (SCOT) PT

UK (E & W

)AT LU IE


Some initial Art. 5 results-risk analysis-

River water bodies (potentialy) at risk

0102030405060708090

100

EE CY LU PL PT FR SK LT LV AT ES IE DE BE UK CZ

insufficient data (%)at risk (%)


Intercalibration sites


Intercalibration exercise Estimated results and gaps

0

1

2009 20212015 2027

HES

1

2

3

4

5

MEP

Janning, NI MU 24 06-04

GEP

1

4

5

Art. 4, 3

Art. 4, 5-7

1

4

5

RBMobjective

Art. 4, 4

EQR„Prague-approach“ for GEP


Initial results - monitoring

RIVERS: Surveillance sites/Water bodies (%)

0,010,020,030,040,050,060,070,080,0

AT SEUK (E

&W)

CZ HUUK (S

COT)

ES LV SI

BE PL RO FR SK LT

DE < 3 %


Surveillance sites per 1000 km2 rivers

RIVERS: No. of surveillance sites per 1000 km2

02468

101214

FILV DE AT SE ES SIHU CZ IE

UK (E &

W)

FR BEUK (S

COT)PL RO SK LT DK


Operational sites / article 5 waterbodies at risk

Operational monitoring sites/(Article 5 number of water bodies at risk + insufficient data)

0,000,100,200,300,400,500,600,700,800,90

UK (E & W) AT LT LV HU

DE ca. 0,80





Danke für Ihre Aufmerksamkeit!

Weitere Informationen unter www.fgg-elbe.de

Documents

Monitoringkonzeption aus Sicht der ... · 12. Magdeburger Gewässerschutzseminar – Oktober 2006 Monitoringkonzeption aus Sicht der Flussgebietsgemeinschaft Elbe im internationalen