Monsters, Inc. movie review

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Monsters, Inc. movie review

    1/2

    Monsters, Inc(2001)

    It's pretty much a truism that any film you see from Pixar is going to be at the very leastentertaining. While I wasn't a huge fan ofA Bug's Life -- I preferredAntz-- I loved Toy Story,and I still think Toy Story 2 may be one of the ten best films I've ever seen. So I went intoMonsters Inc. hopeful, because it's Pixar, but a little wary, because with the ads and the

    trailers it looked like they were trying just a little too hard with this one.

    The beauty of a Pixar film is not in the realistically rendered artwork and characters, or even in

    the big-buck voice talent they usually score. The real trick to a Pixar film is the mindset of theworld it works in, the twisted but understandable logic it uses. In Toy Story, you accept thattoys come alive when you're not there to see them. In a similar twist, Monsters Incsells you

    on the idea that the monsters under your bed are in fact real, that they do come out at nightand scare you, but that they are part of an entire dimension of monsters who are all prettynormal joes except in their appearances. They still have families, fall in love, have jobs, etc.;

    like the toys, they are just like me and you but with a twist. That's what makes Pixar filmswork, ultimately; we can recognize ourselves in these characters.

    And what a pair of leads we are given. Mike Wazowski (Billy Crystal) is a short, rotund littleguy with one eye and long spindly limbs. He's (predictably, being played by Crystal) sarcastic,

    funny, and slightly neurotic. His partner, James P. 'Sully' Sullivan (John Goodman) is a highlyrespected worker at the monster power plant, and Mike pretty much exists in his shadow. Butthey are a team, and Mike is never resentful of his partner's success. Sully is the plant's top

    scarer; apparently the monster world is powered by electricity gathered from children'sscreams, which is why they started coming out from under the bed and inside your closet inthe first place.

    What monsters fear, of course, is contact with our world; they scoot through phantomdoorways and appear to scare us, then retreat quickly back once the energy is gathered. But

    it's almost criminal for them to bring back any objects from our dimension, and they live indread of being contaminated by highly toxic human children. It's all very funny until Sully, byaccident, runs into a human child who does not fear him (monsters are matched to specific

    children to maximize the scare potential). The adorable little child, whom he names'Boo'(voiced by Mary Gibbs)comes into the monster world, and hijinks ensue.

    I won't spoil any more of the plot for you -- in fact, I've only given away about the first tenminutes of set up or so -- but I will say that Pixar knows its strengths and plays to them. Thecharacters are all very likeable; Boo is adorable, and Sully is all heart. Mike is funny and justthe right shade of irascible to be amusing. There are other supporting characters: a viciousopportunistic scarer named Randall (Steve Buscemi) and the creepy but somehow dignifiedspider-boss Henry J. Waternoose (James Coburn, but he reminded me *very* vividly of Orson

    Welles, visually) and the taciturn paper-pusher Roz (Bob Peterson). As you would expect in aPixar film, all of the characters are well realized both visually and in a personality sense.

    What Monsters Inchas, aside from abundant humor, is heart. The movie overflows with it, andBoo's relationship with Sully is just heartwarming. The movie never sways into the maudlin or

  • 7/30/2019 Monsters, Inc. movie review

    2/2

    sappy, but has just the right touch of affection and warmth. That's also where Pixar is strong;Toy Storyfeatured characters more human than most live action films, and Monsters Inc. does

    as well. While it is aimed at the kids, there's enough going on that this one should tickle thefancy of adults, too. And unlike another CGI film that did well at the box office this year, thisfilm isn't a self-absorbed hour and a half of snottiness. Monsters Inc. succeeds not only

    because it's well done, but because it's well intentioned. And that's an increasingly rare double

    victory these days.

    November 6, 2001