Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MOREEFFICIENTMECHANISMSOFBIOLOGICALPHOSPHORUSREMOVALJAMESBARNARD,MARKSTEICHEN&PATRICKDUNLAP
NEWEA – ANNUALCONFERENCE&EXHIBITION
January22-25∣ BostonMA
• HistoryofEBPR• Proposedmechanisms• Alternativeflowsheets• Possiblelimitationsofexistingpractices• Problemswithmodelingalternativeflowsheets• Proposedremedies
AGENDA
• Hi-ratenonitrification• 30to40hinStripper• SupernatanthighinPtreatedwithlime
• Allprimaryeffluenttoaerationbasin
• RASthrudeepanaerobicconditions
SOMEEARLYOBSERVATIONS
2
3
Aerated Settling
Effluent
Stripper
Wasted Biomass
Return Biomass
Influent Wastewater
Lime
P-enriched Lime Sludge
Phostrip ProcessLevinetal(1975)
MIXEDLIQUORFERMENTER(MLF)• Fermenterresultedfrombasinconfigurationandnotdeemedimportant
• Excellentphosphorusremovalresulted
• Noteorthophosphatesprofilethroughplant
• Performancecouldnotbereplicatedinlaboratory
• Barnardsuggestedorganisms(PAO)shouldpassthroughanaerobicphasewithlowORPwhichtriggeredEBPR
• SuggestedPhoredoxprocessbyaddinganaerobiczoneupfront
Barnard100m3/dpilot1972
PHOREDOX(AKAAO)CONCEPTOFPASSINGALLPRIMARYEFFLUENTTHROUGHANAEROBICZONE
AsadaptedbyComeau&Wentzel
• StudiedthePho-stripprocess
• SuggestedPAOtakeupPwhenaerobic,usethatenergytotakeupVFAinanaerobiczone
• IdentifiedPAOasAcinetobacter
• MechanismsfurtherdevelopedbyComeau&Wentzel
FUHS &CHEN(1975)2
6Problem– notalwayssufficientVFAinprimaryeffluent
VFAFROMFERMENTERS
VIEWOFKELOWNAB.C.
Fermenter
PST
AnaerobicZones
*IWA– BiologicalWastewaterTreatment-Principles,,ModelingandDesignHenze etal
• “…itwasincorrectlyconsideredthatPAOswereofthegenusAcinetobacter….orTetrasphaera ”byFuhs &Chenandothers*
• “Morerecently,culture-independentmethodshaveshownAccummulibacter phosphatis …isaPAOwhichcanbegrowninenrichedcultures…”*
• “ForthepurposeofdesignitwillbeconsideredthatanoxicPuptakeisnotsignificant”*
FURTHERSTUDIESIDENTIFIEDCANDIDATUSACCUMULIBACTERASTHEDOMINANTPAO
9
2
WESTBANKWITHFERMENTER
TN <6mg/ℓBOD <5mg/ℓTSS <2mg/ℓTP <0.15mg/ℓ
Westside Kelowna BC (Westbank)
X
WESTBANKWWTP
Primary Anaerob Anoxic1 Anoxic2 Anoxic3 Aerobic1 Aerobic2 Aerobic35.36 20.56 2.20 1.84 1.60 0.50 0.20 0.03BioreactorProfile
PhosphorusbyZone
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00Prim
ary
Anaerob
Anoxic1
Anoxic2
Anoxic3
Aerobic1
Aerobic2
Aerobic3
Phosph
orus
mg/L
NotePuptakeinAnoxicZone
Tetrasphaeracandenitrify
MIXOFORGANISMSINWESTSIDEPLANT
FISHImagefromWRWWTPSludgewithEUBmix(allbacteria)ShowninGreen,Tet2-174(Tetrasphaeraclade2B)inOrange,andTet3-654(Tetrasphaeraclade3)inRed.
Dunlapetal2015
PHOSPHORUSREMOVALWITHSIDE-STREAMFERMENTATION
IowaHillCOplant– FromChrisMaher
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Efflu
entO
rtho
Pm
g/L
9/8/2011 9/9/2011 9/10/2011
EXPERIMENTATDENVERMETRO
Cavanaugh,L.,Carson,K.,Lynch,C.,Phillips,H.,Barnard,J.andMcQuarrie,J.(2012)ASmallFootprintApproachforEnhancedBiologicalPhosphorusRemoval:Resultsfroma106mgdFull-ScaleDemonstration.Proceedingsofthe85thAnnualWaterEnvironmentFederationTechnicalExhibitionandConference,NewOrleans,LA,October2012.
RAS
PHOSPHORUSREMOVALBYRASFERMENTATION– DENVERMETRO
0
5
10
15
20
25
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.010
/4/201
1
10/6/201
1
10/8/201
1
10/10/20
11
10/12/20
11
10/14/20
11
10/16/20
11
10/18/20
11
10/20/20
11
10/22/20
11
10/24/20
11
10/26/20
11
10/28/20
11
10/30/20
11
11/1/201
1
11/3/201
1
11/5/201
1
11/7/201
1
11/9/201
1
11/11/20
11
11/13/20
11
11/15/20
11
11/17/20
11
11/19/20
11
11/21/20
11
11/23/20
11
11/25/20
11
11/27/20
11
11/29/20
11
12/1/201
1
12/3/201
1
12/5/201
1
mg-TSS/L
mg-P/L
NSECEffluentTP
NSECEffluentPO4-P
NSECEffluentTSS
Cavanaugh,L.,Carson,K.,Lynch,C.,Phillips,H.,Barnard,J.andMcQuarrie,J.(2012)ASmallFootprintApproachforEnhancedBiologicalPhosphorusRemoval:Resultsfroma106mgdFull-ScaleDemonstration.Proceedingsofthe85th AnnualWaterEnvironmentFederationTechnicalExhibitionandConference,NewOrleans,LA,October2012.
CAROUSEL PLANTHENDERSONNV60ML/D– UPGRADEDTOBNR
Ortho-P for May 2010
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
5/1/20
10
5/2/20
10
5/3/20
10
5/4/20
10
5/5/20
10
5/6/20
10
5/7/20
10
5/8/20
10
5/9/20
10
5/10/2
010
5/11/2
010
5/12/2
010
5/13/2
010
5/14/2
010
5/15/2
010
5/16/2
010
5/17/2
010
5/18/2
010
5/19/2
010
5/20/2
010
5/21/2
010
5/22/2
010
5/23/2
010
5/24/2
010
5/25/2
010
5/26/2
010
5/27/2
010
5/28/2
010
5/29/2
010
5/30/2
010
Phos
phor
us (m
g/L)
ANA Eft SPS SCC Final Eft
SwitchingoffamixerintheanaerobiczoneresultedinIn-plantFermentation
POSSIBLELIMITATIONSOFEXISTINGCONFIGURATION
• WereweperhapsselectingmostlyforspeciesofAccumulibacter thatneededasupplyofacetic&propionicacid
• TheycouldhaveprevailedinstandardanaerobiczonessinceconditionswerenotidealforfermentingspecieslikeTetrasphaera
• Tetrasphaera canfermentglucoseandaminoacidsandotherhighercarbonformsandstorephosphorus– Nguyenetal
• TheyactuallyproduceVFAthatallowapopulationofAccumulibacter togrowalongsidethem
• Theycandenitrifyunderanoxicconditions
• Whydidwenotgrowthem– notdeepenoughanaerobicconditions
2
17
WHYDIDWEMISSIT?
• ItappearsthatweneedanORPof<-300mV– mostanaerobiczonesstruggletoget-150mV
• ImpossibletoachievewithnitratesorDOanywhere
• Mostplantswereover-mixedwithturbulentsurfacesthatentrainedairwhichpreventeddeeperanaerobicconditions
• Standardmixingenergy0.6hp/kcf– need0.08hp/kcf(hugesavinginenergy)
• Toomuchairentrainedinprimaryeffluent
• ToomuchprimaryeffluentpersewhichmaycontainverylittleVFAthusdilutingthecontentoftheanaerobiczoneandreducingtheanaerobicSRT
18
ORPINANAEROBICZONES
19
0
-100
-200
-300
OR
P (m
V)
Accummulibacter Accummulibacter
Tetrasphaera
VFA
VFA
Anaerobic Zone
Conventional Anaerobic Zone Side-stream Fermenter
Glucose
MODIFIEDWESTBANKPROCESS
2
20Aimfor1to2daySRTinanaerobiczone(12-18hwithfermentate
AndhereIwouldliketothankKevinClarkfromPineryWaterforshowingustheway
WHENNOPRIMARIESUSEMIXEDLIQUORFERMENTER– OLATHEKS,SACRAMENTOCA
21
MLFmixedonlyonceperdayorlessoftenGuidelineSRTofMLFapproximately2days
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Ortho-P
hospha
te,m
g-P/L
Time12/2/13 1/1/14 1/31/14 3/2/14 4/1/14 5/1/14 5/31/14 6/30/14 7/30/14
FlowSplit
Ferm
entat
ion
Powe
rOuta
ge
COD:TKN7.2Nitrates7.5Average
SVI~90ml/gHardlyany
Acetateaddition
PresentLimit2.3mg/l
Endo
fMLF
TheOccurrenceofEnhancedBiologicalPhosphorusRemovalina200,000m3/dayPartialNitrationandAnammoxActivatedSludgeProcessattheChangiWaterReclamationPlant,Singapore– Caoetal,2016
• Step-feednitrification/denitrification• AchieveEBPR– DenitePAO• PresenceofAccumulibacter&Tetrasphaera
LAY-OUTOFCHANGI PLANT- SINGAPORE
Black&Veatch
22
AX
AX
AX
AXAe
robic
AX
AX
AX
AX
Aerobic
AX
AX
AX
AX
Aerobic
AX
AX
AX
AX
Aerobic
AX
AX
AX
AX
Aerobic
RAS
Feed
23
2
TETRASPHAERA IMPACTSMODELBEHAVIOR
Anaerobic Process Aerobic Processes
Ferm
enta
tion
With
OH
Os O
nly
Sb
Acetate
Ordinary Heterotroph
COD
PO4Poly-P
Typical PAO
Growth
O2
Sb
Ordinary Heterotroph
Typical PAO
Growth
PO4Growth
COD
Poly-P
Ferm
enta
tion
With
Tetrasphaera
Anaerobic Process Aerobic Processes
Ferm
enta
tion
With
OH
Os O
nly
Ferm
enta
tion
With
Tetrasphaera
Sb
Acetate
PO4Poly-P
COD
Tetrasphaera
COD
PO4Poly-P
Typical PAO
O2
PO4Poly-P
COD
Tetrasphaera
Typical PAO
Growth
PO4Growth
COD
Poly-P
DRAWBACKSOFPARAMETERADJUSTMENT§ Coarseparameteradjustmentcanofferinsightintocurrent
modelshortcomingsbut;theadjustmentofmanyvariableslikelyresultsinoveradjustment&compensation,calibrationisonlypossibleifallrelevantmechanismsareincorporated,anditwillprovidelittlepredictivepowerwhenextrapolatingbeyondspecificscenario.
§ WeareworkingwithNortheasternUniversitytowardsrecommendationsforbettermodelingsidestreamEBPRaspartWERFstudy
§ RefertoWWTmod 2016paperformoreinformation;RethinkingEBPR:Whatdoyoudowhenthemodelwillnotfitreal-worldevidence?
• ShortcomingsofdesignresultedinselectionforlimitedvarietyofPAO,mainlythosethatneedasupplyofSCVFA
• DeeperanaerobicconditionsareneededtocultivatefermentingPAOsuchasTetrasphaera
• Theseorganismscanalsotakeupphosphorusunderanoxicconditions
• LimitHRTinanaerobiczonebyreducedprimaryeffluentdischargeand/orreducedRASflow
• Wastewatercharacteristicsirrelevant• ModelingforalternativespeciesoffermentingPAOs
CONCLUSIONS
26
2
27
2
28
2
www.bv.com