Upload
neha-chopra
View
224
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
1/29
Organizationali
Fredrik Tell
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
2/29
Structure of presentation
1. What are routines?
2. Questions regarding the nature of routines
3. The role of routines in organizations
4. Routines and innovation
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 2
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
3/29
What are routines (i)?
Analogy to skills, (Nelson and Winter, 1982):
Skills as programs
Function as a unit
Serial function
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 3
Considerable speed and accuracy
Tacit, problem of articulation
Limited time available
Limited causal understanding
Routines inherently holistic and coherent
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
4/29
What are routines (i)?
Difficulty of understanding routines (Cohen and Bacdayan,
1994) Routines are multi-actor phenomena
Routines are emergent phenomena
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 4
Routines as procedural memory (in contrast to declarativememory)
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
5/29
Starting point: Repetition
Nothing can be a routine without repetition
Pattern
Routines occupy 'the crucial nexus between structure andaction, between the organization as an object and organizing as
'
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 5
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
6/29
Question 1: Collective or individual?
organizational routines, individual habits
Stene (1940), Dosi, Nelson & Winter (2000) Nested hierarchy: routines build on habits
Unit of analysis: interaction, interacting communities (communities ofpractice)
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 6
Helps recognize that routines are distributed (parallel to distributedknowledge)
Empirical insights:
routines can be disrupted when participants in a routine start 'actingin a manner that is more individual than collective' (Weick 1990:
579)
coordination requires a balance between individual habits andorganizational routines
(Adapted from Becker, Markus, Routines, change and innovation ,presentation at BETA, Universit Louis Pasteur, France, 21March, 2007)
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
7/29
Question 2: Behavior patterns, cognitiveregularities, or dispositions?
behavior patterns
This interpretation can increasingly be found in the recent empiricalliterature
cognitive regularities
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 7
dispositions
to engage in previously adopted or acquired behavior, triggered byan appropriate stimulus or context
(Becker, 2007)
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
8/29
Question 3: Mindless behavior or effortfulaccomplishment?
mindlessness:
without devoting attention to execution
agents do not draw on substantial cognitive resources from therealm of consciousness
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 8
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
9/29
Effortful accomplishment
Observation: in a variety of organizations, routines are
characterized by being changeable and open to variation possible resolution of the apparent contradiction between
routines as mindless or effortful (Feldman 2002, 2003,Feldmann and Pentland 2003):
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 9
ostensive (label, referring to) vs. performative (carrying out)
neglect of performative aspect leads to neglect of role of actor(agency): Organizational routines are not simply followed orreproduced rather, people have a choice between whether to
do so, or whether to amend the routine
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
10/29
Routines defined Conclusions
the term refers to three different aspects of regularities:
Cognitive regularities (rules, heuristics, etc.): (IF-THEN) RULES
Behavioural regularities (expressed behavior that is stable):RECURRENT INTERACTION PATTERNS
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 10
These are ontologically distinct, cannot be reduced to oneanother
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
11/29
The role of routines in organizations
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 11
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
12/29
(a) Co-ordination and control
Routines enable/facilitate effortless coordination
Capability of routines to enable coordination builds on the basisof a balance between the interests of the participants in theroutine (the so-called 'truce')
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 12
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
13/29
Empirical findings
Knott and McKelvey (1999) compare the relative value of
residual claims and routines in generating firm efficiency; USquick printing industry. Conclusion: routines can be moreefficient for co-ordination and control than residual claims
Standards (and standardized routines) are especially influential
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 13
for exerting control (Segelod 1997), one way to bring about co-ordination; routine behavior is easier to monitor and measurethan non-routine behavior (cf. Langlois 1992)
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
14/29
(b) Providing stability of behavior
'stability' is a relative term it always includes the potential
change that is endogenousto the routine due to its participants(Feldman)
Implication: stability allows to form expectations about thebehavior of others
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 14
Implication: enables learning
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
15/29
Empirical findings
routines are not inert, but typically change over time
(endogenously) routines have a great potential for change due to an internal
dynamic participants responding to the outcomes of previousiterations of a routine (Feldman 2000, 2003; Feldman and
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 15
Pentland 2003) artifacts have an impact on the processes that they are used in
(Hutchins 1991, 1995; Clark 1997; D'Adderio 2001, 2003)
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
16/29
(c) Economizing on cognitive resources
tasks can often be executed in the realm of the sub-conscious,
thereby economizing on limited cognitive resources True organizational level as well as on individual level
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 16
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
17/29
Empirical findings
routines economize on cognitive resources by establishingorganizational predispositions to respond to issues in certainways (Ashmos, Duchon and McDaniel 1998)
Experiments indicate that routines also economize on the timenecessary for reaching a solution; this allows for spontaneous
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 17
reactions even under constraint situations, such as timeconstraints (Betsch, Fiedler and Brinkmann 1998).
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
18/29
(d) Storing knowledge
routines bind knowledge, including tacit knowledge
knowledge in its application therefore, routines are seen as building blocks of
organizational capabilities
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 18
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
19/29
Empirical findings
declarative and procedural knowledge (Cohen and Bacdayan(1994)
'procedural knowledge' characterizes knowledge of how thingsare done, which is relatively inarticulate and encompasses bothcognitive and motoractivities
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 19
a thorough mapping of a routine would also include thedocuments and artifacts used. (Hutchins 1991; 1995)
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
20/29
Empirical findings
routines are sometimes used as 'quarry', that is, they are usedas 'a system of manipulable elements', as a 'structuringresource' for manipulating the list of activities and restructuringtheir position in time. Routines are used as heuristics: insteadof being executed in a precise way, they are followed as a
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 20
,
(Narduzzo, Rocco and Warglien 2000)
changes in the knowledge held in the organization, for examplethe creation and articulation of knowledge, have an impact onthe routines in use. As case studies in the French food and
steel industries have illustrated, such changes put the routinesand the 'truce' surrounding them in question (Lazaric)
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
21/29
(e) Reducing (pervasive) uncertainty
the standard strategy of dealing with choice under
uncertainty is to increase information-processing However, there are situations of uncertainty where this
strategy does not help (Knightean or pervasive uncertainty)
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 21
,
reduce uncertainty
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
22/29
(f) Legitimacy
routines legitimize behavior (less need for justification as it hasalready been carried out this way before)
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 22
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
23/29
Conclusion:Contributions of routines concept
Description
Helps identify processes that generate performance Helps identify variation
Base-line for identifying endogenous change
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 23
n ers an ng organ za ona e av or
Provide analytical depth
Provide an analytical framework for capturing interrelationsbetween rules, behavior patterns, dispositions and artefacts
Understanding organizational change routines help understand endogenous change
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
24/29
Conclusion:Contributions of routines concept
Routines can capture both structure and agency
Structure as it applies to a particular person Psychological factors as influenced by the specific situation
Explanatory power
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 24
Including dimensions in the explanation
Exploring interactions between those dimensions (upwards- anddownwards-reconstitution)
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
25/29
Conclusions
Organizational routines concept is central for analyzing thebehavior of organizations
As sources of stability ...
But sometimes also as drivers of endogenous change
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 25
n , un er cer a n c rcums ances, organ za ona rou nes can
also be drivers of/generate innovation
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
26/29
Organizational routines and innovation
Observation:
Some companies (e.g., Apple, IDEO) have a track record ofconsistently outperforming competitors in terms of innovation(new products)
Research question: Why are some companies able to innovate
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 26
con nuous y
focus on endogenous drivers of innovation
analytical perspective: Organizational routines
proposed for analyzing organizational behavior
capturing what systematic, typical and consistent features of firmbehavior
sustained source of innovation
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
27/29
Innovation routines
Keith Pavitt, innovating routines
good reasons why knowledge of innovating routines
especially in large firms deserves greater attention:
identify ingredients for the successful management of innovation
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 27
messy and changing world
there are opportunities of successfully combining the newtheoretical concepts of innovating routines with rich bodies ofempirical evidence on what happens inside the innovating firm(Pavitt 2002, 118).
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
28/29
Innovation routines
The idea is not new but builds on Nelson & Winter:
Identify theway in which the routine functioning of an
organisation can contribute to the emergence of innovation(Nelson and Winter 1982, 129).
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 28
, ,
routine behavior and innovation than to observe that theseconcepts are commonly (and appropriately) regarded asopposed ideas (Nelson and Winter 1982, 129)
Schumpeterian idea
7/30/2019 Organization Routines
29/29
How to deal with routines in innovation?
The efficiency (stability, control, replicability) of the
innovation process is linked to proper projectmanagement (stage gate processes, concurrentengineering) and organizational structures (heavyweightproject teams, matrix structures, teams, etc.)
2009-09-09 Linkpings universitetSid 29
often, the reliance on procedures and standardization isassociated with privileging incremental innovation(exploitation) over radical innovation (exploration)
exploration/innovativeness at odds with efficiency andcontrol of the process (trade-off)?