14
Partners in Learning Innovative Teacher Communities An evaluation Walter Patterson Partners in Learning

Partners in Learning Innovative Teacher Communities An evaluation Walter Patterson Partners in Learning

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Partners in Learning Innovative Teacher Communities An evaluation Walter Patterson Partners in Learning

Partners in Learning

Innovative Teacher Communities

An evaluationWalter PattersonPartners in Learning

Page 2: Partners in Learning Innovative Teacher Communities An evaluation Walter Patterson Partners in Learning

Partners in LearningTimelinePartners in

Learning

Feb – Jun ‘06 East Ayrshire PilotJun – Sep ‘06 Recruitment of 9 LAsOct ‘06 Launch / Etienne WengerOct ‘06 – Jun ‘07 Phase 1Jun ‘07 “End of Term” eventSep ‘07 7 LAs engage for Phase 2Sep ‘07 – Jun ’08 Phase 2Jun ’08 Project evaluation report

Page 3: Partners in Learning Innovative Teacher Communities An evaluation Walter Patterson Partners in Learning

Partners in LearningAimsPartners in

Learning

The overall aim of this project is to build a sustainable community of innovative

teachers

• To be delivered in each LA by a practising teacher on secondment• Phase 1 focus on developing collaborative environments and identifying training needs• Phase 2 focus on identifying good practice and giving the skills to record and share

Page 4: Partners in Learning Innovative Teacher Communities An evaluation Walter Patterson Partners in Learning

Partners in LearningPilot Project outcomesPartners in

Learning

The pilot project in East Ayrshire established that:

•There were benefits from alignment with existing LA initiatives •The secondee could “make a difference” •Teachers benefited from sharing the classroom practice of other teachers•Teachers tended to access training “just in time”•Difficult for teachers to sustain commitment over time

Page 5: Partners in Learning Innovative Teacher Communities An evaluation Walter Patterson Partners in Learning

Partners in LearningCommunities of Practice conference

Partners in Learning

October 2006Engage with theory of COPUse workshops to flesh out individual LA proposals

But …Some LAs not yet fully settled on their projectInsufficient experience of COP theory

Result…Very few projects made use of formal planning tools to help establish and maintain their COP

Page 6: Partners in Learning Innovative Teacher Communities An evaluation Walter Patterson Partners in Learning

Partners in LearningEngaging with LAsPartners in

Learning

A key element of the project was to link the ITC project to other LA initiatives. Typical links were:

•Extending the life of existing “masterclass” communities•Glow mentors and Glow Groups pilots•Projects for innovative teachers supported by LTScotland•A “learning community” •Determined to Succeed initiatives

This arrangements has worked well for almost all projects

Page 7: Partners in Learning Innovative Teacher Communities An evaluation Walter Patterson Partners in Learning

Partners in LearningEngaging with LAsPartners in

Learning

The benefits from this approach included:

• Access to extended set of resources, included other project officers• Inclusion in training activities to improve ICT use in classroom • Building on established group of motivated teachers

Page 8: Partners in Learning Innovative Teacher Communities An evaluation Walter Patterson Partners in Learning

Partners in LearningCommunities of Practice

Partners in Learning

There were some broader contexts for the project:

•Masterclass training over several years (NOF)•Development and roll-out of GLOW (but to limited set of LAs)•Work of LTS, including the annual Scottish Learning Festival•HMIE report on ICT in Learning and teaching

These provided synergy for developing innovative classroom practice

Page 9: Partners in Learning Innovative Teacher Communities An evaluation Walter Patterson Partners in Learning

Partners in LearningSharing Good PracticePartners in

Learning

Overall, the project has been successful in identifying and sharing good classroom practice

•Over 50 VCTs already produced (from nursery to senior stages of secondary)•Further 28 VCTs “promised”•Showcased at ITC project events, at SQA, at SLF•Presented at Microsoft ITN events in Philadelphia, Paris, Helsinki and Zagreb•Hosted on SQA website and on LA intranets/blogs•Available (soon) on Microsoft ITN website

Page 10: Partners in Learning Innovative Teacher Communities An evaluation Walter Patterson Partners in Learning

Partners in LearningMaintaining CommunitiesPartners in

Learning

The main mechanisms used to initiate and maintain COP:

Conventional•Group meetings (usually twilight)•CPD and training events•Visits to innovative teachers by the secondee•Provision of documentation (reports, policies)

Online•Email•Discussion Forums (such as LTS Forums or Glow Groups)•LA intranets•Blogs / Wikis

Page 11: Partners in Learning Innovative Teacher Communities An evaluation Walter Patterson Partners in Learning

Partners in LearningMaintaining CommunitiesPartners in

Learning

A COP was initiated at project level, based on an LTS Discussion Forum. This became moribund towards the end of Phase 1 and was not replaced.

For those who wished to use Glow Groups (usually as part of LA pilot) there were frustrations and delaysFor those who opted for LA intranet support there were also frustrations and technical hitchesFor those who use independent blog/wiki services there were the drawbacks in using a free service on the web

Result…….

Page 12: Partners in Learning Innovative Teacher Communities An evaluation Walter Patterson Partners in Learning

Partners in LearningExperiences of online communities

Partners in Learning

Not a positive one

With a few exceptions most online communities have started well but have not been sustained over the life of the project.

•Marratech VC – where project is about connecting and collaborating•Angus Transition – where use of blog is part of formal monitoring of progress

Page 13: Partners in Learning Innovative Teacher Communities An evaluation Walter Patterson Partners in Learning

Partners in LearningConclusions Part 1Partners in

Learning

•The PIL project sat comfortably with individual LA aspirations for ICT development•The PIL project was synergistic with national initiatives regarding ICT (such as Glow, CFE)•Individual teachers respond well to support and practical advice/help•Individual teachers respond well to seeing how others have done it (VCTs)•Authority-wide projects get the benefits of scale and collaboration

Page 14: Partners in Learning Innovative Teacher Communities An evaluation Walter Patterson Partners in Learning

Partners in LearningConclusions Part 2Partners in

Learning

•Communities of Practice are hard to sustain, especially in online formats•Teachers lack time to develop the competencies and behaviours necessary to participate in a thriving online community•Blogs and wikis tend to “die”•The slow progress of the Glow initiative has brought frustration to many and a disincentive to some