16
PEER ASSISTANCE AND REVIEW Curriculum Council, January 2012

PEER ASSISTANCE AND REVIEW Curriculum Council, January 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: PEER ASSISTANCE AND REVIEW Curriculum Council, January 2012

PEER ASSISTANCE AND REVIEW

Curriculum Council, January 2012

Page 2: PEER ASSISTANCE AND REVIEW Curriculum Council, January 2012

MVESC Study Team

Jill Fry, River View Local Schools

Barb Funk, Mid-East CTC

Susan Troutner, Morgan Local Schools

Cathy Morgan, MVESC

Page 3: PEER ASSISTANCE AND REVIEW Curriculum Council, January 2012

Research QuestionsGeneral PAR Questions

What should PAR look like?Should PAR be evaluative? Supportive?How does PAR fit in with other programming?ETC.

PAR Panel QuestionsHow often does the PAR Panel meet?Who should be part of the PAR Panel?Could the district’s Lead Mentor Team be part of the PAR Panel?What role(s) do the members of the PAR Panel take?ETC.

Consulting TeachersWhat is the role of the consulting teacher?What should be the qualifications of the Consulting Teacher?How should you select a Consulting Teacher?What kind of staff development is needed for the consulting

teacher?ETC.

Page 4: PEER ASSISTANCE AND REVIEW Curriculum Council, January 2012

ResourcesTeacher Peer Assistance and Review, Lorin W. Anderson and Leonard O. Pellicer, Corwin Press

The Peer Assistance and Review Reader, Ellen Moir, The New Teacher Center @UCSC

How to Plan and Implement A Peer Coaching Program, Pam Robbins, ASCD

A User’s Guide to Peer Assistance and Review, Harvard University

Cincinnati Public SchoolsColumbus Public SchoolsRochester SchoolsToledo City Schools

Models that we studied.

Page 5: PEER ASSISTANCE AND REVIEW Curriculum Council, January 2012
Page 6: PEER ASSISTANCE AND REVIEW Curriculum Council, January 2012

Agenda

Introduction: Cathy

History of How PAR Got Started and Models: Susan

PAR Processes: Barb

Professional Development: Jill

Talking Points

Page 7: PEER ASSISTANCE AND REVIEW Curriculum Council, January 2012

WHAT IS PAR?

Developed in Toledo, Ohio by Union President Dal Lawrence (1980).

Local Teachers Union and District administration jointly manage the program.

Districts have used the Toledo Model and have adapted it to meet the needs of their districts.

PAR is a program to improve teacher quality.

Page 8: PEER ASSISTANCE AND REVIEW Curriculum Council, January 2012

Improving Teacher Quality…

Supportive

Evaluative

Both Supportive and Evaluative

Models were designed based on District Initiatives and Needs

Page 9: PEER ASSISTANCE AND REVIEW Curriculum Council, January 2012

Common Elements of PAR

The Toledo Model…

1. Novice Teachers

2. Ineffective Teachers

Who participates? Novices, Experienced Teachers or Both

Page 10: PEER ASSISTANCE AND REVIEW Curriculum Council, January 2012

Major Characteristics

PAR Panel- consisting of Teachers and Administrators

PAR Consulting Teachers

PAR Referral Process

PAR Implementation Process

PAR Evaluative Process

Page 11: PEER ASSISTANCE AND REVIEW Curriculum Council, January 2012

History of PAR and Models of PAR

Susan Troutner

Page 12: PEER ASSISTANCE AND REVIEW Curriculum Council, January 2012

PAR ProcessesReferral Process

Implementation Process

Barb Funk

Page 13: PEER ASSISTANCE AND REVIEW Curriculum Council, January 2012

Professional Development for PAR

Jill Fry

Page 14: PEER ASSISTANCE AND REVIEW Curriculum Council, January 2012

Ideas for Professional Development

Teaching Standards

Observation and Performance

Conferencing Strategies

Cognitive Coaching

Collaboration

Dealing with Difficult Staff Members

OTES Credentialed

Page 15: PEER ASSISTANCE AND REVIEW Curriculum Council, January 2012

What are your first steps in getting started with a PAR Program?

What PAR components could we collaborate on?

Talking Points

Page 16: PEER ASSISTANCE AND REVIEW Curriculum Council, January 2012

MVESC Peer Assistance and Review Study Team

Jill Fry [email protected]

Barb funk [email protected]

Susan Troutner [email protected]

Cathy Morgan [email protected]

Thank You!