31
Page 1 Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004 Sponsored by the California Energy Commission and the California Institute for Energy Efficiency A Case Study of Precooling with Zone Temperature Reset in a Commercial Office Building

Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

  • Upload
    nuri

  • View
    25

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A Case Study of Precooling with Zone Temperature Reset in a Commercial Office Building. Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004 Sponsored by the California Energy Commission and the California Institute for Energy Efficiency. Outline. Aim Test site description - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 1

Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette

January 23, 2004Sponsored by the California Energy Commission and

the California Institute for Energy Efficiency

A Case Study of Precooling with Zone

Temperature Reset in a Commercial Office

Building

Page 2: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 2

Outline

• Aim

• Test site description

• Precooling and demand shedding strategies

• Test results

• Utility analysis

• Conclusions and future work

Page 3: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 3

Aim

Demonstrate the potential for reducing peak-period electrical demand in a moderate-weight commercial building using building structural mass.

Page 4: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 4

Executive Summary

• Precooling and zone temperature reset can shift up to 100% of cooling power from on- to off-peak in a moderate-weight commercial buildings

• Electricity peak demand reduced by as much as 2.3 W/ft2

• Potential for cost savings when combined with Critical Peak Pricing

Page 5: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 5

Case Study - Introduction

• Started in August 2003

• Purpose - preliminary study to assess potential and need for further work– Potential demand reduction/load shifting in

moderate-weight buildings– Effectiveness of precooling and zone

temperature reset – Thermal comfort

Page 6: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 6

Test Site Description• Medium-sized government building

– Santa Rosa, CA– 80,000 ft2 (40,000 ft2 office + 40,000 ft2 courthouse)– 3 stories

• Relatively low mass building structure– 6 in. concrete floor, 4 in. concrete wall, medium

furniture density, standard commercial carpet

• High window-to-wall ratio – Floor to ceiling glazing on south and north façade

• Typical internal loads • Number of occupants

– ~100 (office side)

Page 7: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 7

South Facade

Page 8: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 8

North Facade

Page 9: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 9

Windows

• Single glazing• Tinted glass• Internal blinds

Page 10: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 10

Cooling Plant

• West wing: three 75-ton, 30-year old McQuay air-cooled chillers

• East wing: two 60-ton, 10-year old Carrier air-cooled chillers

• Constant-speed water pumps, one for each chiller

• Two stage compressors

Page 11: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 11

HVAC Secondary Systems

Five VAV air handling units (three single duct & two dual duct systems):

• Variable-speed supply and return fans

• 50-60 VAV zones • DDC control (Alerton)• No global rest of zone

temperature

Page 12: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 12

Building Operation

• 5 am - 8 am - start up

• 8 am - 5 pm - occupancy

• 2-3 hot/cold calls per month

• No major faults, some modest problems: – One undersized cooling coil– Some air balance problems– Lack of reheat coils in single-duct systems

causes temp control problems

Page 13: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 13

Precooling & Zonal Reset Strategies

66

68

70

72

74

76

78

80

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Tem

p (

oF

)

current precooling+zonal reset

extended precooling + zonal reset

unoccupied hours occupied hours unoccupied hours

floating

floating

floatingfloating

floating

zonal reset

precooling

Page 14: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 14

Monitoring

• Existing:– Whole building power meters– Chiller power meters– Weather station– HVAC performance data from EMCS

• ~500 data points• 15 minute intervals

• Added:– AHU fans power meters– Operative temperature sensors

Page 15: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 15

Operative Temperature & Comfort

Convectiveheat exchange

Radiant heat exchange

RoomRegular temperature sensor

globe

Operative temperature sensor

screen

Page 16: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 16

Peak OA Temperature vs. Peak Demand

Whole building power vs Peak OA temp

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110

Outside air peak temperature

wh

ole

bu

ildin

g p

ow

er

(kW

)

-0.2

0.8

1.8

2.8

3.8

4.8

5.8

wh

ole

bu

ildin

g p

ow

er

(kW

/sf)

weekend/holidays

working days

CPP hours

Page 17: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 17

Classification of Weather Conditions

40

60

80

100

120

10/1 10/6 10/11 10/16 10/21 10/26 10/31

Ou

tsid

e ai

r te

mp

(oF

)

Hot daysWarm daysCool days

Page 18: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 18

Comparison of Baseline & Test Conditions

40

60

80

100

120

10/7 10/8 10/9 10/10 10/11

Warm daybaseline

Warm dayprecooling

Cool daybaseline

Cool dayprecooling

10/2310/22

Page 19: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 19

Tests Performed

Limited Precooling + zonal reset

Extended Precooling + zonal reset

Cool days 3Warm days 5 1Hot days 2

Page 20: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 20

Cool Days – Limited Precooling

Limited precooling (Cool days)

00.5

11.5

22.5

33.5

4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Time (hour)

Wh

ole

bu

ildin

g p

ow

er

W/s

qft

Limited precooling 1 Limited precooling 2 baseline

1 W/sf shed

Page 21: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 21

Warm Day – Limited Precooling

Limited precooling (Warm days)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Time (hour)

Wh

ole

bu

ildin

g p

ow

er

W/S

qft

baseline Limted precooling

1.4 W/sf shed

Page 22: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 22

Extended & Limited Precooling

Limited and Extended Precooling (warm days)

00.5

11.5

22.5

33.5

4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Time (hour)

Wh

ole

bu

ildin

g p

ow

er W

/sq

ft

baseline Limited precooling Extended precooling

1.4 W/sf shed

Page 23: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 23

Hot days – Extended Precooling

Extended Precooling (Hot days )

0

1

2

3

4

5

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Time (hour)

Wh

ole

Bu

ildin

g p

ow

er

W/s

qft

Extended precooling 1 Extended precooling 2 baseline

2.3 W/sf shed

Page 24: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 24

Chiller Power: Limited Precooling

Chiller power shedding

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Time (hour)

Ch

ille

r p

ow

er

(W/f

t)

precooling+DL_10_8 baseline_10_6

0.7 W/sfshed

Page 25: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 25

Results – Fan Power

response of one supply fan

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Time (hour)

fan

po

wer

(kW

)

fan power

1.5 kW shed

precooling zonal reset

Page 26: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 26

Results – Zone Temp

zone air temperatures

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

4:00 8:00 12:00 16:00 20:00 0:00

zon

e t

em

pe

ratu

re (

oF

)

Precooling_Temp_operative Precooling_Temp_DDCPrecooling_Average zone temp baseline_temp

Page 27: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 27

Critical Peak Pricing (1 of 3)

• Operating time– CPP high price: 3:00pm –6pm– CPP moderate price: 12:00pm –3:00pm

• CPP days (12 days: 5/1 – 10/31)– Average of maximum outside air

temperatures in San Francisco, San Jose, Sacramento and Fresno > 98 oF

Page 28: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 28

Critical Peak Pricing (2 of 3)

• Current tariff: A-10S

• Non CPP Day Rate– On-peak credit, $0.0559/kWh, (12 pm- 6 pm)– Part-peak credit, $0.0050/kWh, (8:30 am-12 pm)

• CPP Day Rate– Moderate price, $0.24/kWh (12 pm – 3 pm)– High price, $0.82/kWh, (3 pm-6 pm)

Page 29: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 29

Critical Peak Pricing (3 of 3)

$-

$2,000.00

$4,000.00

$6,000.00

$8,000.00

$10,000.00

$12,000.00

$14,000.00

$16,000.00

$18,000.00

non-CPP dayssavings

CPP days extracost withprecooling

CPP days extracost w/o

precooling

Page 30: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 30

Market Potential – Cooling in Office Buildings

• State-wide peak demand ~50GW• Commercial cooling - largest contributor: 15%, ~7.5 GW

Cooling Electricity Breakdown*

Large office (>30,000 sf)

Small office (<30,000 sf)

RetailsCollegeRestraurant

School

Health

Hotel

Others

*CEC 1994 electricity consumption

Page 31: Peng Xu, Philip Haves, James Braun, MaryAnn Piette January 23, 2004

Page 31

Conclusions• Precooling & zone temp reset can shed up to 80 –100% of

the cooling peak load, without comfort complaints, even in relatively high outside temperature conditions (90 oF)

• Benefits of nocturnal precooling are unclear• Economic savings can be made if combined with CPP or

similar DR programs Extended Precooling + DL Hot days

0

1

2

3

4

5

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Time (hour)

Wh

ole

Bu

ild

ing

po

wer

W/s

qft

Extended precooling 1 baseline

2.3 W/sf shed