Upload
others
View
9
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Pharmacogenomics-based individualization of drug therapy
Taisei Mushiroda, Ph.D.
Laboratory for Pharmacogenetics
Center for Genomic Medicine, RIKEN
ETH Zurich-JST Workshop on Medical Research, 15 Sep 2008
2
Center for Genomic Medicine (CGM), RIKENProf. Yusuke
Nakamura
Director
Research Group for Genotyping
Research Group for Disease-Causing Mechanism
Research Group for Medical Informatics
Research Group for Pharmacogenomics
3
Response rates of patients to a major drug:Physician's Desk Reference (2000)
Spear et al. TRENDS in Molecular Medicine 7:201-4 (2001)
0 20 40 60 80 100 (%)Analgesics (COX-2)
Depression (SSRI)Asthma
Cardiac arrhythmiasSchizophrenia
DiabetesMigraine (acute)
Rheumatoid arthritisMigraine (prophylaxis)
Osteoporosis HCV
IncontinenceAlzheimer’s
Oncology
4
Individualization of drug therapyin personalized medicine
● To identify✓ Responders / non-responders to a drug✓ Patients with higher risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) before the administration
“Right drug at the appropriate dosage for each individual patient”
Effective Not effective
Drug A:
5
Pharmacogenomics (PGx): ICH Guideline E15
● Study of variations of DNA and RNA characteristics
as related to drug response
● Applicable to activities such as drug discovery,
drug development, and clinical practice
6
Application of PGx to personalized medicine
1. Avoid severe adverse drug reactions
✓ Docetaxel (anti-cancer reagent)
2. Predict efficacy
✓ Tamoxifen (treatment for breast cancer)
3. Predict appropriate dosage for each patient
✓ Warfarin (anti-coagulant)
7
Docetacel (Taxotere®)
● Microtubule inhibitor
● Approved for treatment of patients with refractory
breast cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, ovarian
cancer, and head and neck cancer
● Severe myelosuppression (leucopenia / neutropenia):
Frequency of ~36%
8
Systemic circulation
Hepatic artery
Hepatic vein Docetaxel
Liver
Bile duct Excretion
Transporters responsible for biliary excretion of docetaxel
Blood
SLCO1B3
Hepatocyte
ABCC2
Bile duct
Hepatocyte
Docetaxel
9
P valueABCC2 GG + GC CC GG + GC CC(rs12762549) 24 15 66 8 0.00080
(62%) (38%) (89%) (11%)
SLCO1B3 AA AG + GG AA AG + GG(rs11045585) 20 19 63 11 0.00017
(51%) (49%) (85%) (15%)
ADR (n =39) Non-ADR (n = 74)
SNPs in ABCC2 and SLCO1B3 were associated with docetaxel-induced
myelosupression
10
Scoring
11 12 22SLCO1B3 rs11045585 0 1 1ABCC2 rs12762549 100
GenotypeSNP IDGene
Non-risk
ADR(n = 39)
Non-ADR(n = 74)
0
1
2
Sum
of s
core
7
20
12
1
17
56
39
288
605
Normal control(n = 932)
OR = 7.00, P = 0.0000057
Prediction system for docetaxel-induced myelosupression using ABCC2 rs12762549
and SLCO1B3 rs11045585
Risk
Usual dosage
Decreasingdosage
Contra-indication
11
Tamoxifen (Nolvadex®)
● Widely used for prevention of recurrence for patients
with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (adjuvant
hormonal therapy)
● Potent in suppressing estrogen-dependent cell
proliferation
● Oral administration, 20~40 mg/day
12
Tamoxifen, antagonist for estrogen receptor
Ovary
Breastcancer
Estrogen
Adrenal
Androgen
EstrogenAromatase
Tamoxifen
Premenopausal Postmenopausal Hypophysis
Stimulatinghormone
X X
13
Metabolic activation of tamoxifen by CYP2D6
Jin et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:30-9 (2005)
CYP2D6
CYP2D6
CYP3A4/5 CYP3A4/5
Tamoxifen
Endoxifen(active)
ON
ON
OH
ONH O
NH
OH
14
High frequency of CYP2D6*10 in JapaneseAllele
CYP2D6*1
CYP2D6*3
CYP2D6*4
CYP2D6*5
Normal
None
None
None
Total
Whole deletion
A2549del
G1846A (splicing defect)
0
0.5
6.1
6.6
Allele freq.in Japanese
(homozygote, <1%)
C100T(P34S)
Decreased 40.8CYP2D6*10
15
Number of subjects (%)*1/*1 20 (29.9)*1/*4 1 (1.5)*1/*5 4 (6.0)*1/*10 23 (34.3)*5/*10 2 (3.0)*5/*41 1 (1.5)*10/*10 15 (22.4)*10/*21 1 (1.5)
CYP2D6 genotype frequencies in Japanese breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen
16
Effects of CYP2D6*10 on recurrence-free survival of breast cancer patients treated
with tamoxifen
Years
P = 0.00100
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 2 4 6 8 10Years
P = 0.00310
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 2 4 6 8 10
Rec
urre
nce-
free
rat
e
*10/*10 (n=15)
*1/*10 (n=23)
*1/*1 (n=20)
*10/*10 (n=15)
*1/*1+*1/*10(n=43)
17
Warfarin (WF)● The most commonly-used oral anticoagulant for treatment of thromboembolism in the world
● Interferes with regeneration of vitamin K→ inhibits activation of vitamin K-dependent clotting factor II (prothrombin), VII, IX and X
● Difficult to adjust the appropriate dose to each patient due to large interindividual variation in dose requirement
Insufficient dose → failure of preventing thrombosisOver-dose → increase of unexpected bleeding risk
● The maintenance dose for Japanese was about 30% lower than those for Caucasian
18
Impact of inappropriate dose of WF in USA
2 million people / year start warfarin treatment
Bleeding event:
184,000 people (9%)
Stroke:
40,000 (2%)
Cost: $2.4 billion Cost: $1.6 billion
Cost due to inappropriate dosage:
$4.0 billion / year
McWilliam et al.AEI-Brooking Joint Center,Working Paper (2006)
19
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0Dose (mg/day)
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
No.
of s
ubje
cts
Median: 2.5 mgMinimum: 0.5 mgMaximum: 10.5 mg
Distribution of daily maintenance dose in WF-treated 828 Japanese patients
20
Flows of standard WF treatment
Initial dosage:1 mg
INR: Within target range?
Continue the dosage
A few days after
A few days after
Yes No
Increase / decrease / discontinue
INR monitoring
e.g., Prevention of stroke caused by atrial fibrillation in elder patients: 1.6 - 2.6
21
Warfarin PGx: CYP2C9 and VKORC1
● CYP2C9
Hepatic drug-metabolizing enzyme of warfarin
● VKORC1
Responsible for recycle of vitamin K in liver
22
The vitamin K cycle
Reduced formVitamin K epoxide
Factors II, VII, IX, XProteins C, S, Z
Functional factors
Vitamin K
OHCH3
ROH
O
O
CH3
R
O
O
CH3
RO
Inhibition
O
OH
O
O
H
WF
VKORC1
23
Daily WF dose for Japanese patients with different genotypes for CYP2C9
*3/*3(n=1)
*1/*1(n=790)
0
246
810
12
*3/*1(n=37)
P = 3.9 × 10-4
Dos
e (m
g/da
y)
2.0 2.0 2.5
24
Daily WF dose for Japanese patients with different genotypes for VKORC1
0
24
6
81012
CC(n=6)
TT(n=690)
Dos
e (m
g/da
y)
CT(n=132)
P = 5.1 × 10-11
4.0 3.52.5
Intron 1-136T>C
Japanese; <1% 16% 84%Caucasian 37% 48% 15%
(Wadelius et al., Pharmacogenomics J, 2005)
25
0
2
4
6
8
1012
Dos
e (m
g/da
y)
TT TT TT CT CT CCVKORC1
*3*3 *3*1 *1*1 *3*1 *1*1 *1*1CYP2C9(n=1) (n=34)(n=655)(n=3)(n=129)(n=6)
Daily WF dose for Japanese patients classified by Warfarin responsive index (WFRI)
TT CT CC0 1 1
*3/*3 *3/*1 *1/*10 0 1
VKORC1
CYP2C9
02
4
6
8
1012
Dos
e (m
g/da
y)
Score 0(n=35)
Score 1(n=658)
Score 2(n=135)
P = 4.4 × 10-13
2.0 2.53.5
Score 0 Score 1 Score 2
1 mg
26
Prediction of initial WF dose based on WFRI
Although the dose adjustment with INR is necessary, ….
● Reducing period for achievement of maintenance dose● Avoiding risk of serious bleeding / stroke
GenotypingVKORC1 and CYP2C9
Score 0Started with 2 mg
Score 1With 2.5 mg
Score 2With 3.5 mg
27
C 5’3’NInvader probe
T 5’3’NG
Flap 1
Allele probe
VIC
Flap 1
Allele probeG
Cleaved bycleavase
Not cleaved
G
Invader assay
Cleaved bycleavase
3’ FRET probe
QuencherVIC
FAM
3’ FRET probe
AFlap 2
QuencherFAM
Cleaved bycleavase
28Medical treatment support system
Time
SNP1
SNP2
SNP3
Fluo
resc
ence
FAMVIC
Prediction of appropriate dosage by genotyping based on Invader assay
SNP analysis system
Genotype
CC
CT
TT
Patient ID:12345Initial dosage:X mg
Transfer
29
30
Considerations for Increased Bleeding Risk Identification of risk factors for bleeding and certain
genetic variations in CYP2C9 and VKORC1 in a patient may increase the need for more frequent INR monitoring and the use of lower warfarin doses.
Initial DosageThe lower initiation doses should be considered for
patients with certain genetic variations in CYP2C9 and VKORC1 enzymes as well as for elderly and/or debilitated patients and patients with potential to exhibit greater than expected PT/INR responses to COUMADIN.
Updated Warfarin Prescribing Information:August 16, 2007