18
Physicochemical indicators of water in Durowskie Lake

Physicochemical indicators

  • Upload
    hisoki

  • View
    64

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Physicochemical indicators. of water in Durowskie Lake. Purpose of research. To figure out, what is current situation in the lake To compare results of our research with former monitoring results and therefore to find out tenden cy in development of Durowskie Lake - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Physicochemical  indicators

Physicochemical indicators

of water in Durowskie Lake

Page 2: Physicochemical  indicators

Purpose of research

• To figure out, what is current situation in the lake

• To compare results of our research with former monitoring results and therefore to find out tendency in development of Durowskie Lake

• To find out, what to do in order to improve water quality

Page 3: Physicochemical  indicators

Area of research and

sampling sites

Page 4: Physicochemical  indicators

Sampling & measuring

Page 5: Physicochemical  indicators

Measured indicators

• Chlorophyll „a” concentration

• Oxygen concentration

• Water saturation with oxygen

• Conductivity

• Temperature

• pH

• Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)

Page 6: Physicochemical  indicators

Measuring methods

• All indicators, apart of chlorophyll „a”

concentration, were measured on field,

using multiparameter water quality sonde.

(the one on picture differs a bit from the device we had)

Page 7: Physicochemical  indicators

Sampling water for measuring chlorophyll „a”

• Samples of water were taken into bottles and filtrated.

• Filters were stored in the fridge and then, transported to laboratory in Poznań.

Picture: device used for filtrating water samples

Page 8: Physicochemical  indicators

Laboratory work for measuring chlorophyll „a” concentration

• Pounding filters with acetone

• Extracting in 24 hours

• Spectrophotometric measuring of chlorophyll „a” concentration

Page 9: Physicochemical  indicators

Results of research

Page 10: Physicochemical  indicators

Results of researchOxyg en %

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0,00 20,00 40,00 60,00 80,00 100,00 120,00

Aerator 1

B each 1

B each 2

Middle 1

Middle 2

Aerator 2

T DS (g /l)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

300,00 310,00 320,00 330,00 340,00 350,00 360,00

A erator 1

B eac h 1

B eac h 2

Middle 1

Middle 2

A erator 2

Page 11: Physicochemical  indicators

Classification of lake based on our measurments• We compared our results with the newest

law for classification of waters.• This Ordinance of Enviromental Ministery

(2008) is compatible with the Water Framework Directive.

Parameter Value ClassificationChlorophyll „a” 13,7 µg/L III class, but almost II class

Oxygen concentration (hypolimnion)

0,23 mg/L Bad

(but still over 0 level)

Secchi Disc 2,02 m Good

Conductivity 395 µS/cm Good

Page 12: Physicochemical  indicators

Trophic State Index (TSI)

• We calculated TSI basing on 2 methods: Secchi Disc visibility method and Chlorophyll a method

• Our calculations indicated, that the water quality is in lower range for eutrophic state (almost border with mesotrophic).

Trophic state

oligotrophic mesotrophic eutrophic Hypertrophic Durowskie lake

TSI value

<40 40-50 50-70 >70 SD: 50Chl a: 55

Page 13: Physicochemical  indicators

Comparing with last year

Page 14: Physicochemical  indicators

Improve in oxygen conditions

• Until last year oxygen conditions in upper hypolimnion improved a lot in Aerator I sampling state.

Oxyg en %

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0,00 20,00 40,00 60,00 80,00 100,00 120,00

Aerator 1

B eac h 1

B eac h 2

Middle 1

Middle 2

Aerator 2

Page 15: Physicochemical  indicators

Conductivity improvement

• Conductivity value decreased a lot from last year

• Also, the gradient of conductivity in water profile is reversed: it proves, that resuspention of nutrients from sediments has been stopped.

Page 16: Physicochemical  indicators

What are the changes?

Year 2010 2011

Chlorophyll „a” ≈ 9 µg/L ≈ 14 µg/L

Conductivity ≈ 650 µS/cm ≈ 400 µS/cm

pH on surface ≈ 8 ≈ 8,7

Transparency ≈ 1,5 m ≈ 2 m

TDS (surface) 0,41 g/L 0,31 g/L

Diss. oxygen 10 mg/L (surface)

10 mg/L (surface)

Page 17: Physicochemical  indicators

Conclusion

• The ecological state of water is improving, especially oxygen concentration and conductivity.

• Now, the most important thing is to reduce loads of nutrients incoming from catchment area, and keep recultivation activities on proper level.

• The lake is on a good way to satisfy the Water Framework Directive

Page 18: Physicochemical  indicators

Thank You!