2
Clin Genet 1999: 56: 462–463 Printed in Ireland. All rights reser6ed Letter to the Editor Postaxial polydactyly and Dandy – Walker malformation. Further nosological comments To the Editor: The association of postaxial polydactyly and Dandy – Walker malformation or related brain anomalies can be seen in chromosomal (trisomy 13, trisomy 8), autosomal recessive (hydrolethalus, Meckel, pseudotrisomy 13), and autosomal domi- nant (Pallister Hall, Greig) syndromes. In 1996, Morava et al. (1) reported on a patient with Dandy – Walker anomaly and postaxial poly- dactyly, suggesting that this combination of defects could represent an oligosymptomatic case of hy- drolethalus syndrome. Buttie ¨ns et al. (2) and Fryns and Van den Berghe (3) described two unrelated families whose members presented with an occipital bone defect and postaxial polydactyly as the main features, but with a wide variability of expression. With regard to these cases, and commenting on the report of Morava et al. (1), Fryns (4) suggested that not only autosomal recessive, but also the men- tioned autosomal dominant syndrome should be considered among the differential diagnoses in cases with Dandy – Walker malformation and postaxial polydactyly. The presence of only two malformations in an infant, without other, perhaps minor, anomalies, which could favor the diagnosis of a specific syn- drome, frequently raises doubts as to whether we are dealing with a syndrome or an unspecific asso- ciation. In order to evaluate the diagnostic value of the association postaxial polydactyly Dandy – Walker malformation or related brain anomalies, we determined in 16 201 multiply malformed in- fants ascertained by the ECLAMC (5): 1) the fre- quency of the association between postaxial polydactyly and unspecific hydrocephalus; and 2) the frequency of the association between postaxial polydactyly and Dandy – Walker malformation or related anomalies. Finally we analyzed each of the observed cases individually. These data partially overlap with those reported by Castilla et al. (6). As the expression of Dandy – Walker malforma- tion is variable, including hydrocephalus, anoma- lies of the posterior fossa, cerebellum, and corpus callosum, we established the frequency of associa- tion between postaxial polydactyly and any of the following anomalies: Dandy – Walker malforma- tion, anomalies of the cerebellum, corpus callosum or septum pellucidum, with or without hydro- cephalus. Postaxial polydactyly and unspecific hydro- cephalus are frequent among multiply malformed infants (52/1000 and 62/1000, respectively; ECLAMC data). However, they do not seem to associate preferentially with each other. Although without statistical significance, postaxial poly- dactyly and unspecific hydrocephalus were nega- tively associated (39 observed cases, expected 52; exact probability by Poisson p = 0.067). Conversely, there was a positive association be- tween postaxial polydactyly and specific brain anomalies (Dandy – Walker and related malforma- tions) (ten observed cases, five expected; exact probability by Poisson p = 0.032). When analyzing the records of the ten observed cases, in nine of them the pediatrician in charge of the malformed child had defined or suspected a syndrome, by clinical features, positive family his- tory, or parental consanguinity (trisomy 13 syn- drome 3, hydrolethalus syndrome 2, acrocallosal syndrome 1, pseudotrisomy 13 syndrome 1, Meckel syndrome 1, and acromelic frontonasal ‘dysplasia’ 1). One case with postaxial polydactyly and dysge- nesis of the corpus callosum had a positive family history for polydactyly, so a random co-existence of two independent traits seemed likely (Table 1). In conclusion, postaxial polydactyly does associ- ate preferentially with certain specific brain anoma- lies. This fact, plus the analysis of the individual cases and the negative association with unspecific hydrocephalus, suggests that in the presence of any association between postaxial polydactyly and Dandy – Walker malformation or related brain anomalies, a syndrome should be suspected. M Rittler EE Castilla 462

Postaxial polydactyly and Dandy–Walker malformation. Further nosological comments

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Clin Genet 1999: 56: 462–463Printed in Ireland. All rights reser6ed

Letter to the Editor

Postaxial polydactyly and Dandy–Walkermalformation. Further nosological comments

To the Editor:The association of postaxial polydactyly andDandy–Walker malformation or related brainanomalies can be seen in chromosomal (trisomy 13,trisomy 8), autosomal recessive (hydrolethalus,Meckel, pseudotrisomy 13), and autosomal domi-nant (Pallister Hall, Greig) syndromes. In 1996,Morava et al. (1) reported on a patient withDandy–Walker anomaly and postaxial poly-dactyly, suggesting that this combination of defectscould represent an oligosymptomatic case of hy-drolethalus syndrome. Buttiens et al. (2) and Frynsand Van den Berghe (3) described two unrelatedfamilies whose members presented with an occipitalbone defect and postaxial polydactyly as the mainfeatures, but with a wide variability of expression.With regard to these cases, and commenting on thereport of Morava et al. (1), Fryns (4) suggested thatnot only autosomal recessive, but also the men-tioned autosomal dominant syndrome should beconsidered among the differential diagnoses incases with Dandy–Walker malformation andpostaxial polydactyly.

The presence of only two malformations in aninfant, without other, perhaps minor, anomalies,which could favor the diagnosis of a specific syn-drome, frequently raises doubts as to whether weare dealing with a syndrome or an unspecific asso-ciation.

In order to evaluate the diagnostic value of theassociation postaxial polydactyly – Dandy–Walker malformation or related brain anomalies,we determined in 16 201 multiply malformed in-fants ascertained by the ECLAMC (5): 1) the fre-quency of the association between postaxialpolydactyly and unspecific hydrocephalus; and 2)the frequency of the association between postaxialpolydactyly and Dandy–Walker malformation orrelated anomalies. Finally we analyzed each of theobserved cases individually. These data partiallyoverlap with those reported by Castilla et al. (6).

As the expression of Dandy–Walker malforma-tion is variable, including hydrocephalus, anoma-lies of the posterior fossa, cerebellum, and corpus

callosum, we established the frequency of associa-tion between postaxial polydactyly and any of thefollowing anomalies: Dandy–Walker malforma-tion, anomalies of the cerebellum, corpus callosumor septum pellucidum, with or without hydro-cephalus.

Postaxial polydactyly and unspecific hydro-cephalus are frequent among multiply malformedinfants (52/1000 and 62/1000, respectively;ECLAMC data). However, they do not seem toassociate preferentially with each other. Althoughwithout statistical significance, postaxial poly-dactyly and unspecific hydrocephalus were nega-tively associated (39 observed cases, expected 52;exact probability by Poisson p=0.067).

Conversely, there was a positive association be-tween postaxial polydactyly and specific brainanomalies (Dandy–Walker and related malforma-tions) (ten observed cases, five expected; exactprobability by Poisson p=0.032).

When analyzing the records of the ten observedcases, in nine of them the pediatrician in charge ofthe malformed child had defined or suspected asyndrome, by clinical features, positive family his-tory, or parental consanguinity (trisomy 13 syn-drome 3, hydrolethalus syndrome 2, acrocallosalsyndrome 1, pseudotrisomy 13 syndrome 1, Meckelsyndrome 1, and acromelic frontonasal ‘dysplasia’1). One case with postaxial polydactyly and dysge-nesis of the corpus callosum had a positive familyhistory for polydactyly, so a random co-existenceof two independent traits seemed likely (Table 1).

In conclusion, postaxial polydactyly does associ-ate preferentially with certain specific brain anoma-lies. This fact, plus the analysis of the individualcases and the negative association with unspecifichydrocephalus, suggests that in the presence of anyassociation between postaxial polydactyly andDandy–Walker malformation or related brainanomalies, a syndrome should be suspected.

M RittlerEE Castilla

462

Letter to the Editor

References

1. Morava E, Adamovich D, Czeizel AE. Dandy-Walker mal-formation and polydactyly: a possible expression of hydro-lethalus syndrome. Clin Genet 1996: 49: 211–215.

2. Buttiens M, Fryns JP, Jonckheere P, Brouckmans-ButtiensK, Van den Berghe H. Scalp defect associated with postax-ial polydactyly: confirmation of a distinct entity with auto-somal dominant inheritance. Hum Genet 1985: 71: 86–88.

3. Fryns JP, Van den Berghe H. Congenital scalp defectsassociated with postaxial polydactyly. Hum Genet 1979: 49:217–219.

4. Fryns JP. Dandy-Walker malformation and postaxial poly-dactyly: nosological comments. Clin Genet 1997: 51: 139.

5. Castilla EE, Lopez-Camelo JS. The surveillance of birthdefects in South-America: I. The search for time clusters:epidemics. Adv Mutagen Res 1990: 2: 191–210.

6. Castilla EE, Lugarinho R, Dutra MG, Salgado LJ. Congen-ital anomalies associated to polydactyly. Am J Med Genet1998: 80: 459–465.

Correspondence:Monica Rittler, MD, PhDTucuman 3130, Olivos(1636) Buenos AiresArgentinaTel.: +54-114-799-7570Fax: +54-114-794-1630E-mail: [email protected]

463

Tabl

e1.

Des

crip

tion

ofth

ete

nca

ses

with

post

axia

lpol

ydac

tyly

and

brai

nan

omal

ies

CAS

ES

12

34

56

78

910

Polyd

acty

lyC

ross

ed*

Han

dsbi

late

ral

Cro

ssed

Feet

bila

tera

lH

ands

bila

tera

lH

ands

and

feet

Cro

ssed

Han

dsan

dfe

etPo

lydac

tyly

NFS

Han

dsan

dfe

etbi

late

ral

bila

tera

lbi

late

ral

CN

SAg

enes

isco

rpus

Dys

gene

sisD

andy

–Wal

ker

Dan

dy–W

alke

rM

icro

ceph

aly

Hyd

roce

phal

usH

ydro

ceph

alus

.D

andy

–Wal

ker

Agen

esis

Agen

esis

corp

usAg

enes

isse

ptum

mal

form

atio

nca

llosu

mm

alfo

rmat

ion

Dan

dy–W

alke

rco

rpus

callo

sum

.ca

llosu

mC

ereb

ellu

mco

rpus

callo

sum

mal

form

atio

nO

ccip

ital

anom

aly

pellu

cidu

mm

alfo

rmat

ion

ence

phal

ocel

eEy

esC

olob

oma

Anop

htha

lmia

Mic

roph

thal

mia

Mic

roph

thal

mia

CL/

CP

++

++

+M

icro

gnat

hia

++

+Ki

dney

sH

ydro

neph

rosis

Enla

rged

Hyd

rone

phro

sisG

enita

liaH

ypos

padi

asSm

allp

hallu

sH

ypos

padi

asC

rypt

orch

idism

Cry

ptor

chid

ismO

ther

Hyp

oden

seoc

-Fr

onto

nasa

lH

eart

defe

ctAp

lasia

cutis

cipi

talb

one

dyso

stos

isTi

bial

agen

esis

Mic

rotia

Fam

ilyda

taFa

milia

lpol

y-Br

othe

ral

soaf

-Pa

rent

alco

nsan

-da

ctyly

guin

ityfe

cted

Dia

gnos

isAc

roca

llosa

lsyn

-Tr

isom

y13

syn-

Hyd

role

thal

usTr

isom

y13

syn-

Pseu

dotri

som

yTr

isom

y13

syn-

Hyd

role

thal

usAc

rom

elic

fron-

Mec

kels

yndr

ome

drom

esy

ndro

me

drom

e13

synd

rom

edr

ome

tona

sal‘

dys-

synd

rom

edr

ome

plas

ia’

*Han

ds:p

osta

xialh

exad

acty

ly;fe

et:h

allu

xdu

plic

atio

n.N

FS=

not

furth

ersp

ecifie

d;C

NS

=ce

ntra

lner

vous

syst

em;C

L/C

P=

clef

tlip

/cle

ftpa

late

.