94
PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

PRIMER

COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA

PILOT PROJECT

JULY 2008

Page 2: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

2

Table of ContentsI Introduction to Responsible Investment (p. 3)

- Jantzi Research

II Shareholder Action and Proxy Voting (p. 34)- The Ethical Funds Company

III Community Investment (p. 45)- Tides Canada Foundation and Vancity Community Foundation

IV Developing a Responsible Investment Policy (p. 79)- SHARE

V Bibliography (p. 95)

Note:The RIPP Primer is compiled from different source presentations. Originals are credited in detail in the Bibliography.

Page 3: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

I

Introduction to Responsible Investment

Page 4: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

4

What’s in a name?

• the integration of environmental, social and governance parameters into the investment decision making process

SRI

MBI

Page 5: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

5

• the incorporation of an institution’s central purpose or calling into its investment decision making process.

Responsible Investment

Page 6: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

6

Definition of RI

• There are many different names given to responsible investment, but one common definition:

“The integration of environmental, social and governance factors in the selection and management of investments.”

From Social Investment Organization

www.socialinvestment.ca

Page 7: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

7

Four Approaches to RI

• ESG Integration – the integration of social, environmental and governance factors in stock selection

• Screening – selecting investments on the basis of pre-identified social, environmental and governance factors

• Shareholder action – exercising ownership rights such as proxy voting, management negotiations, shareholder resolutions

• Community investment – assets invested in local community development

Page 8: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

Responsible investing is becoming mainstream…

Page 9: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

9

Europe

• retail SRI in Europe totals more than €48.7 billion in assets – increase of 102% from year before

• institutional SRI in Europe totals about €2 trillion in assets under management

Page 10: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

10

Government mandated disclosure: a catalyst for change

• July 2000 – UK Pensions Disclosure Regulation: “the extent (if at all) to which social, environmental or ethical considerations are taken into account in the selection, retention and realisation of investments”

• Australia– 2001 – Financial Services Reform Act

– Belgium, France, Germany, Italy• Pension funds acting on SRI

– Netherlands – ABP, PGGM– France - Fonds de Réserve Pour Les Retraites

– Scandinavia – Sweden, Denmark, Norway

Page 11: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

11

United Kingdom• February 2001 - Trustee Act requires charity

trustees to make sure investments are suitable, not only financially but also with regard to the charity’s stated aims

• increasing number of charities and foundations embracing SRI

– Barnardo’s

Page 12: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

12

Barnardo’s• UK charity focused on children - founded 1866

– companies considered to exploit children (usually in the Third World) in the manufacture of their products

• “…not to hold investments in companies whose activities are considered to be to the detriment of children and where we believe donor support might be adversely affected.”

– companies who derive significant income from the production or distribution of pornography or adult entertainment television

– companies which derive more than 10% of their turnover from the production or sale of tobacco products

Page 13: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

13

SRI Assets in the U.S.

Page 14: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

14

U.S. Foundations• interviewed 92 foundations – 64

private, 24 community and 4 corporate

• during the past ten years the number of U.S. foundations involved in SRI has doubled

• fastest growth in foundations with less than $200 million in assets under management

• F.B. Heron Foundation, David and Lucile Packard Foundation, Vermont Community Foundation

Page 15: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

15

U.S. Foundations• focuses on development

and implementation – “from idea to execution’

• 12 case studies highlighting a variety of experiences – Kalamazoo Community Foundation

• risk, return, and impact

Page 16: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

16Jantzi Research Inc.

• $503 billion in SRI assets in 2006– increase from $65.5 billion over two years

$36.5 $18.1

$12.8

$433.1

$1.94Asset Managers

Retail Investment Funds

Invetsment Managersemploying ESG

Pension Plans employingESG

Socially ResponsibleLending

SRI Assets Under Management in Canada

Page 17: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

17

The Legality of RI…

Page 18: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

18

Harries vs. Church Commissioners

• Trustees may avoid investing in a company if it clearly conflicts with the aim or purpose of the organization, even though it may be the most prudent investment financially.

• In those circumstances where trustees are satisfied that investing in a company engaged in a particular type of business would conflict with the very objects their trust is seeking to achieve, then they’re duty bound not to invest.

Page 19: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

19

Legal Perspective• October 2005 – Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer

• leading international law firm, with over 2,400 lawyers in 28 offices in 18 countries across Europe, Asia and the U.S.

– A legal framework for the integration of environmental, social and governance issues into institutional investment

• “…integrating ESG considerations into an investment analysis so as to more reliably predict financial performance is clearly permissible and is arguably required in all jurisdictions.”

Page 20: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

20

Evidence that it is possible to implement RI and generate a competitive rate of return…

Page 21: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

21

Mainstream Investment Initiatives and Investors

• Multilateral mainstream SRI initiatives

• UN Principles of Responsible Investment

• Pension Funds who have endorsed UNPRI- Canada Pension Plan Investment Board

- British Columbia Investment Management Corp.

- Caisse de dépot

– CICA - MD&A Disclosure About the Financial Impact of Climate Change and other Environmental Issues

– Carbon Disclosure Project

Page 22: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

22

What’s the Opportunity?• generation of alpha

• growing body of research highlighting link between superior sustainability performance and enhanced share value

Page 23: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

23

Materiality studies demonstrate value of ESG

• 10 sell-side brokerage houses invited to undertake reports across sectors/ themes to evaluate the materiality of environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues

• ESG issues are material – there is robust evidence that ESG issues affect shareholder value in both the short- and long-term

• the impact of ESG issues on share price can be valued and quantified

• materiality varies across sector and themes

Page 24: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

24

Materiality Studies

• 10 academic/20 sell-side brokerage studies

• evidence suggests that there appears to be no performance penalty from taking ESG factors into account in the investment management process

• 10 studies are positive, 7 neutral, and 3 negative

• SRI leading to underperformance is a misconception

Page 25: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

25

Positive Performance of Sustainability Indexes

e.g. Jantzi Social Index®

Page 26: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

26

80.00

100.00

120.00

140.00

160.00

180.00

200.00

220.00

240.00

260.00

De

c-9

4

Ma

r-9

5

Ju

n-9

5

Se

p-9

5

De

c-9

5

Ma

r-9

6

Ju

n-9

6

Se

p-9

6

De

c-9

6

Ma

r-9

7

Ju

n-9

7

Se

p-9

7

De

c-9

7

Ma

r-9

8

Ju

n-9

8

Se

p-9

8

De

c-9

8

Ma

r-9

9

Ju

n-9

9

Se

p-9

9

De

c-9

9

Va

lue

of

$1

00

in

ves

ted

JSI Index TSE 100 Index TSE 300 Index

Jantzi Social Index® - Backtest

Page 27: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

27

JSI TSE 100 TSE 300Annualized Return 18.93% 18.11% 17.35%Std Dev (Risk) 16.12% 16.04% 15.76%Sharpe Ratio* 0.802 0.755 0.720* (Return-RiskfreeReturn)/StdDev [Assumed Rf=6%]

Jantzi Social Index® - Backtest

Page 28: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

28

JSI® - Comparative Values (through April, 2008)

RETURNS Apr 2008 3 mths 6 mths 1 yr 3 yr* 5 yr* Inception* Inception**

JSI 5.90% 7.60% -3.90% 5.45% 16.21% 17.80% 8.32% 94.71%

S&P/TSX COMPOSITE

4.60% 6.66% -3.42% 6.58% 16.837% 18.65% 8.19% 92.71%

S&P/TSX 60 5.42% 7.36% -1.73% 10.15% 18.80% 19.47% 8.16% 92.23%

Source: State Street Global Advisors (SSgA) * Annualized ** Cumulative(since 01/01/2000)

Page 29: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

29

JSI® - Comparative Returns (through April 30, 2008)

Comparative Returns: Dec 1999 - April 2008

70.00

80.00

90.00

100.00

110.00

120.00

130.00

140.00

150.00

160.00

170.00

180.00

190.00

200.00

210.00

Val

ue

of

$100

inve

sted

JSIS&P/TSX Comp

S&P/TSX 60

Page 30: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

30

Why Mission-Based Organizations Invest in RI

• Advance organizational mission• Align investments with values• Enhance shareholder value• Reduce reputational risk• Provide marketplace differentiation• Provide universal investors with investment

options• May be legally required

Page 31: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

31

Different Screening Approaches

1. Negative screens – also referred to as exclusionary screens

2. Best-of-sector approach – allows investment in, e.g., the top 20% to 35% of companies in every sector, ranked on sustainability performance grounds. This can allow funds to invest in companies from every industry, as long as they rank the companies chosen comparatively well for environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria

3. Positive screens - usually used to described thematic focus such as cleantech/renewable energy

Page 32: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

32

Companies are Rated for their ESG Performance

Page 33: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

33

Standards for determining social/environmental performance

• Strengthening Communities

• Environment

– community consultation

• Human Rights

– aboriginal relationships– charitable giving

– UN Declaration of Human Rights– United Nations Global Compact

– UNEP: The Hazardous Chemicals and Wastes Conventions (e.g. Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants)

Page 34: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

34

II

Shareholder Action and Proxy Voting

Page 35: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

35

The Name Game

Shareholder Action

Shareholder EngagementCorporate Engagement

Corporate DialogueShareholder Activism

Page 36: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

36

Shifting perceptions

10%

29%

26%

35%

Over next 1-2 yearsOver next 3-5 yearsOver next 6-10 yearsNever

Screening

Source: 2005 Fearless Forecast, ©2005 Mercer Human Resource Consulting LLC and Mercer Investment Consulting, Inc.

Page 37: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

37

Shifting perceptions

7%

30%

36%

27%

Over next 1-2 yearsOver next 3-5 yearsOver next 6-10 yearsNever

ESG evaluations

Source: 2005 Fearless Forecast, ©2005 Mercer Human Resource Consulting LLC and Mercer Investment Consulting, Inc.

Page 38: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

38

Shifting perceptions

48%

29%

12%

11%

Over next 1-2 yearsOver next 3-5 yearsOver next 6-10 yearsNever

Active ownership

Source: 2005 Fearless Forecast, ©2005 Mercer Human Resource Consulting LLC and Mercer Investment Consulting, Inc.

Page 39: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

39

Shareholder Action Definitions

• Shareholder action– Monitoring corporate performance– Seeking changes in corporate practice through dialogue – May involve the use of shareholder proposals

• Shareholder proposal– Request that a company undertake specific action– Companies are legally obliged to include proposals in

management proxy circular – Voted on at annual general meeting

Page 40: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

40

Value• Engage to acquire an informational advantage• Engage to encourage long term value creation• Engagement to control risk and boost

performance

Values• Engage to make companies more sustainable • Engage to better fulfill your mission

Why Conduct Shareholder Action?

Page 41: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

41

Shareholder Action ApproachIdentify Candidates and

Establish Goals

Establish Stakeholder Coalition

Communicate Concerns to Company and Offer Dialogue

Company Acknowledges Concerns and Agrees to Dialogue

Company Agrees to Dialogue

Meet with Company

Establish Course of Action

Follow-up and Monitor Company Progress

Company Fails to Acknowledge Concerns

File Shareholder Proposal

Company Opposes Proposal in Proxy Circular

Solicit Support and Move Proposal at AGM

Assess Results and Establish Next Steps

Page 42: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

42

Proxy Voting Definitions

• Proxy voting– Owners of common stock have the right to vote on a variety of

company policies and practices– Opportunity to vote comes in advance of annual meeting– Voting items from management and shareholders– Published in Management Information Circular

• Proxy voting guidelines – Establish proxy voting positions and decision rules on corporate

governance and social issues

• Proxy voting services– Assist investors with the proxy management, analysis, voting, and

disclosure process

Page 43: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

43

Proxy Voting Disclosure

Page 44: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

44

Proxy Voting Current Web Disclosure

Page 45: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

45

III

Community Investing

Page 46: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

46

Social Finance

Program Related Investment (PRI)

Mission Related Investing (MRI)

Mission Based Investing (MBI)

Community Economic Development (CED)

Social Enterprise

Social Economy

Social Investing

Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) Environment Social Governance

(ESG)

Triple Bottom Line (TBL)

Social Purpose Business

Social Venture Fund

Different Names for Community Investing…

Page 47: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

47

Context Driving Financial Innovation

• New perspectives on “theory of change” beyond “grantsmanship”

• Leveraging more assets: convening capability, networks, long term capital, leadership, etc

• Recognizing urgency and scale of enviro-social challenges; new rules of the game (e.g. carbon’s impact)

• Rise of social entrepreneurship

• Search for social innovation’s scaled impact

• Moving beyond sectoral silos (government, voluntary, business): role of hybrid space & relationship to social innovation

• Recognizing value of community asset building and social enterprise

• Benefiting from international lessons & best practices (UK, US, etc.)

Page 48: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

48

Foundations Involved Already

• Active foundations in MRI/MBI/CI field (partial list):– JW McConnell Family Foundation (Qwest U loan); – Ivey, Metcalfe: NCC Revolving Fund with RBC (in formation) with

foundation loan guarantees – Edmonton Community Foundation (Social Enterprise)– Vancity Community Foundation (Groans: grant/loans)– Vancouver Foundation (SRI, SVF) – Endswell Foundation (non profit building)– Tides Canada Foundation (social enterprise)– Ilahie Foundation (non profit building) – Bealight Fdn/Social Capital Partners (social enterprise) – Muttart Foundation (non profit building)– CAIC (Canadian Alternative Investment Co-op) handling CI

investments for religious charities; [Jubilee Fund]

Page 49: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

49

How Do Social Entrepreneurs Finance Their Great Ideas?

• Social entrepreneurs are seeking: Scale, Durability, Impact

• That requires resilient, sustainable financing

• Traditional nonprofit external funding sources – charitable donations and Gs+Cs – face challenges

• More likely option is “business model”: social enterprise or hybrid (part nonprofit, part enterprise)

Page 50: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

50

Challenge becomes: How to finance social entrepreneurs’ enterprises?

→ Moving from grants to other forms of finance…

Page 51: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

51

NONPROFITS DEPEND ONFEW SOURCES OF INCOME

All Organizations

3%13%

35%

49%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

40% provincial, 9% federal

Government

Earned Income

Donations and Grants

Other

Page 52: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

52

Growing Donations But Declining Donors:

1984 to 2005

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

22%

23%

24%

25%

26%

27%

28%

29%

30%

Donations % of Taxfilers

Donors as a %of Taxfilers

Average Donation ($)

Source: CRA compiled by Imagine Canada

Page 53: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

53

Social finance is…

finance with a social or environmental mission

OrSocial finance is a sustainable

approach to managing money that delivers social, environmental dividends

and economic return through social enterprises operating in the non-profit

or public benefit universe.

Page 54: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

54

Social Finance Exists Across A Broad Continuum…

HIGH INVOLVEMENT

LOW INVOLVEMENT

CH

AR

ITA

BLE

CO

MM

ER

CIA

LVenture philanthropy

Traditional grant making

Venture capital

Bank lending

Adapted from Margaret Bolton, 2003

Page 55: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

55

Social finance’s most visible example is MICROFINANCE…

Page 56: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

56

Social enterprise is…

A business with primarily social (and/or environmental) objectives whose surpluses are principally reinvested for that purpose in the business or in the community, rather than being driven by the need to maximise profit for shareholders and owners...

Page 57: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

57

Social finance for public benefit

• The flow of financial capital to human need uses:

– Affordable Housing

– Social Enterprise

– Support for working families

– Health & Home Care

– Community Development

– Social Economy

– Clean Technology

– Microfinance

– Fair Trade

– Green Building

– Education

– Bottom of the Pyramid

(source: market sector listing adapted from www.xigi.net)

Sources

Intermediaries

Mechanisms

Recipients

Uses

Page 58: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

58

Social Finance Examples• Local community development

– The Columbus Foundation used $2 million PRI to seed an $18 million low-cost housing fund to build 1,600 new units of affordable housing.

– The Social Enterprise Fund (SEF) is designed to fuel the social economy by providing alternative financing, leveraging mainstream funding, and providing technical assistance to social entrepreneurs. The SEF will be capitalized in the amount of $10.5M over five years. Key financial partners are likely to include the City of Edmonton, the Edmonton Community Foundation, other levels of government and private donations.

• Startup or expansion capital in underserved communities– Deutsche Bank created an innovative $20 million investment fund to finance the

expansion of eye care hospitals in developing countries. The Eye Fund I will provide loans and guarantees to support the development of affordable, sustainable and accessible eye care for the world's poor while providing a near-market return

• Debt mechanisms– Millions in loans to community finance institutions and social enterprises by

Vancity, Citizens Bank and Calvert Foundation’s Community Investment Note, • Using public policy & tax system

– PLAN (Planned Lifetime Advocacy Network) promoted Registered Disability Savings Plan (RDSP), families are incentivized to save for disabled children who will survive them

Page 59: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

59

Collaborative approaches and blended returns

• Growing social and environmental pressures + government and market failure = the conditions for social innovation

Government Business

Charity & Non-profit

Hybrid Space

Projected Income

New

Social Finance

Expanding Earned Income

Existing

Earned Income

Gvrnt Gs & Cs

Charitable Donations

Page 60: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

60

Social Finance Supports Businesses in the Public Benefit Universe

Social

Commercial

Adapted from: John Kingston, Venturesome

Community Interest Companies

Low Profit Limited Liability Companies (L3C)

Page 61: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

61

Financial Entities- managing other’s money

How does capital flow?

1. From the source

2. Into an organization

3. For use in either

Soc. P

urpo

se B

us.

Social

Ent

erpr

ise

Bus. A

rm o

f Cha

rity

Charit

y

Soc. R

esp.

Bus

iness

Busine

ss

Social

Commercial

Adapted from: John Kingston, Venturesome

Community Interest Companies

Government Organizations

Individuals

Operations

Programs

Assets

INVESTTAX

DIRECT

Page 62: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

62

Foundation MBI, MRI, PRI

• PRIs are a new tool for philanthropy

• Employ an investment approach

• What’s the rationale?– New arena for impact – Leverage potential: partnerships (business, non-profit,

government) and hybrids– Supports new trend of SE organizational profile– Embraces the financial sustainability & financial

resiliency agenda– Diversifies asset management

Page 63: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

63

Canada Revenue Agency Rules

• CRA includes CI in its 1999 Community Economic Development (CED) policy, referring to PRIs

• Two frameworks applicable:

– PRIs (Program Related Investments) with charities

– Regular Investing

• CRA Off-the Record Policy Consultation (2008)

Page 64: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

64

Envisioning Canada’s Social Finance Marketplace

• NONPROFITS: Accessing social finance for financially self-sustaining & asset building enterprises tackling social & environmental needs (e.g. economic opportunity for disadvantaged populations, homecare infrastructure, disability agenda/RDSP, market shifting, community-based renewal energy, etc.)

• MAINSTREAM CAPITAL: Offering range of RDSPs, “Community Venture Funds”, “Green Venture Funds”, “Local Employment Venture Funds”, “Conservation Economy Investment Funds”, “Social Housing”, etc.

• GOVERNMENT: Providing enabling policy (Municipal, Provincial & Federal)

– Special tax credits for social enterprise investing, enabling private capital. Income at lowered tax rate, or receive refundable tax credit.

– Regulatory changes to simplify how charities and non-profits can directly operate or control social enterprises in the new hybrid space.

– Capacity building support for the evolving non-profit sector through dedicated funding mechanisms targeting key constituencies and social policy goals (e.g. for business plan development of social sector social enterprises, for technical training for financial and business managers in the emerging social-business hybrid sector, etc.)

• INVESTING PUBLIC: Expanding ownership of “social finance” asset class products in addition to equities and fixed income securities

• USER PUBLIC: Benefiting from emergence of innovative new systems of delivery and support for public benefit services and sustainability services.

Page 65: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

65

Social Finance Poised To Grow Quickly Since…

• Canada can borrow proven models from US and UK• We can make the transition to a robust social finance

marketplace with:- New conversation among finance, government, foundations

and nonprofits about the potential to scale up innovative social enterprise and social finance

- New capital market instruments involving the range of financial institutions: banks, credit unions, pension funds, mutual funds, etc.

- Public policy that a) creates incentives for capital to expand into social finance, b) borrows international best practices in charity regulations that enable foundations and nonprofits to operate successfully in the growing hybrid space

- Strengthening the capacity of nonprofits, their social enterprises, and intermediary institutions

Page 66: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

66

Causeway New national collaboration accelerating a social finance market place for financing social innovation serving public benefit

SiG@MaRS

Page 67: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

67

BUILDING BUZZ& LEVERAGING

NETWORKS

SUPPORT LEADERSHIPPARTNRSHIP

& SHARED OWNERSHIP

MOBILIZE KNOWLEDGE & CAPACITY

BUILDING

ENGAGE MAINSTREAM

FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

SUPPORT MOVEMENT OF SOCIAL FINANCE STAKE-

HOLDERS

SHOWCASE DEAL

MECHANISMS

POLICY CHANGE

CAUSEWAY

Page 68: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

For more information about CAUSEWAYhttp://causeway-sff.wikispaces.com/

and Social Finance visit:

www.tidescanada.org

For more information on the charity sector visit:www.imaginecanada.ca

Page 69: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

69

Community Investing in Practice:

A Vancity Case Study

Page 70: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

70

Role of Community Investing at Vancity Community Foundation

• Community investing as part of our objectives since inception

• Our bylaws refer to “investments which are prudent” rather than those “in which trustees are authorized by law to invest”

• Part of strategy for using all our assets toward mission

• Fit with Vancity Credit Union as a key partner and with existing capacity

• CI increasingly a fit with donors and other partners (and growing demand from community organizations)

Page 71: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

71

CI at Vancity Community Foundation

• A range of different transactions, including individual micro-credit loans, social enterprise, arts, social housing, asset building for non-profits, bridge loans, etc.

• Fits within CRA guidelines as Program Related Investment (especially with respect charities), or as part of overall investment strategy

• Most often done as part of a much larger financial package, leveraged as high as 10:1

Page 72: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

72

CI at Vancity Community Foundation

• During some down market cycles, the community investment holdings have been the strongest part of our portfolio

• Still working on articulating an effective framework for measuring non-financial returns

Page 73: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

73

CI at Vancity Capital Corporation

• Significant amount of community investing experience through Vancity Capital Corporation (venture capital subsidiary of Vancity Credit Union)

• More than $15MM, 50 transactions and sizes, $25K to $1.5MM, areas including education, arts, employment training, housing, transportation, natural resource management, social services, health, sports, food, alternative energy, aboriginal communities, etc.

Page 74: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

74

CI at Vancity Capital Corporation

• Losses less than 2%, including some additional risk mitigation in place from Federal Government, average returns of 10% (before operating cost allocations) – return on assets somewhere between 6% - 12% depending on leverage and allocation assumptions in model

• Non-profit organization represent 15% of the overall portfolio at Vancity Capital, as high as 25% when including sustainability businesses

Page 75: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

75

Lessons learned in CI• It starts with a willingness to engage in this activity

(some tolerance for risk taking and a view to how this fits the mandate of the organization) – often learning by doing and seeing value in lessons

• Need to set boundaries and objectives for this (often in policy, or a shared understanding

• Balance the need for structure and boundaries with flexibility (often through processes – using committees or individuals with delegated authority or using the entire Board within tolerances for risk and based on investment size

Page 76: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

76

Lessons Learned in CI• Capacity is a key challenge (both the capacity of your

organization to structure transactions and lend, and the capacity of investees to effectively use repayable capital)

• Relationships are key. It often comes down to trust, and community investments often emerge from existing relationships within organizations

• Investment partners help to spread risk and can complement the due diligence process

• Additional risk mitigation tools or “credit enhancements” can be useful (additional loss reserves, risk sharing agreements, rate buy downs, insurance, priority agreements, etc…)

Page 77: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

77

Lessons Learned in CI

• A portfolio approach helps ensure broader blended returns and helps avoid concentration risk with too few transactions in too few sectors

• A long time frame is important, together with a set of financial and non-financial objectives (including appropriate milestones for development)

• To achieve scale, it will likely be necessary to seek intermediaries with specific expertise and to package transactions for multiple investors

Page 78: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

78

IV

Developing A Responsible Investment Policy

Page 79: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

79

The Policy Development Roadmap

“Should a foundation be more than a private investment company that uses some of its excess cash flow for charitable purposes?”

F.B Heron Foundation Board of Directors

Yes – but how

Page 80: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

80

The Policy Development Roadmap

“We want to implement responsible investment…now what?”

Page 81: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

81

The Policy Development RoadmapInitiate Discussion at Board Level

• Identify the informational needs for your board. (i.e. How does RI affect returns? Are other foundations implementing RI strategies)

• Identify and participate in educational opportunities• Identify mentors and/or other external experts• Build your RI team to include staff, board and investment

committee members• The role of the investment committee is critical – need to

understand their perspectives and constraints and they need to be involved throughout the process

Page 82: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

82

The Policy Development RoadmapSet Policy Objectives

• What does responsible investment mean for your foundation?• What are the key triggers that led your organization to consider

responsible investment?• How can a responsible investment policy be grounded within

the values and mission of the foundation?• Survey stakeholders to better understand priorities in order to

reflect these in the responsible investment policy• How does responsible investment fit within your existing

program priorities and activities?

Page 83: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

83

The Policy Development RoadmapDevelop Policy and Integrate

• Start with an overarching policy statement or philosophy• Look at sample and model policies to act as a guide• How does responsible investment fit within your existing

investment strategies? (i.e. asset allocation strategy, performance guidelines, investment manager review criteria)

• Talk to your investment managers and ask them questions about responsible investment

• Integrate responsible investment principals into your investment policies or guidelines

Page 84: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

84

The Policy Development RoadmapIdentify Implementation Strategy• Choosing your pathway • Identify the strategies that make the most sense and

meet the priorities and objectives you have laid out• Incremental approaches allow decision-makers to

educate themselves about each strategy, consider their value and monitor the results over time

• Pathways could include entering the market opportunistically or allocating a certain portion of the endowment for RI strategies

• Some organizations start with proxy voting because it works with their existing portfolio

• EVERY STEP COUNTS!

Page 85: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

85

The Atkinson Foundation: A Case Study

Why Responsible Investment

MISSION…to promote social and economic justice in the tradition of Joseph E. Atkinson.

INVESTMENT PHILOSOPHYThe Foundation believes that it should implement its mission not only through the ideas people, organizations and projects it supports, but also by how it invests and otherwise uses its assets. Ensuring that its deeds match its words, the Foundation seeks to ensure that its grant making and investment practices all align with its mission.

Page 86: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

86

The Atkinson FoundationOvercoming Hesitancy

KEY CATALYSTS • Champions at the staff, board and investment committee level• Broad ‘theoretical’ support for the need to align grant-making and investing with mission

KEY STEPS• Building the collective knowledge of the Board•Asking questions…over and over again• Identifying and working with mentors• Utilizing grant capital to foster a greater understanding of RI and MBI• And finally…developing the policy

Page 87: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

87

The Atkinson FoundationMission Based Investment Policy

The Foundation is committed to its fiduciary responsibilities and recognizes that this responsibility does not end with maximizing return and minimizing risks. The Foundation believes its fiduciary responsibility includes the consideration of its investment decisions on corporate conduct, and broader social concerns. The Foundation will pursue MBI with the following assumptions in mind:• Evidence demonstrates that MBI does not have to have a negative effect on financial returns;• There are no perfect companies; and• MBI can positively influence corporate conduct, improve stakeholder relations and ultimately maximize profits.

Page 88: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

88

The Atkinson FoundationMission Based Investment Policy cont’d

The Foundation will work with its fund managers to develop positive and negative screens, and to be an active shareholder. The Foundation will further its mission through investments that:

• Promote high quality, fair and just employment opportunities;• Support young children and their caregivers;• Reduce poverty and improve quality of life for the poor;• Support such other granting themes as the Foundation may determine from time to time.The Foundation favours companies that support and advocate for a strong and effective public sector.

Page 89: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

89

The Atkinson FoundationImplementation…With Some Help from Friends

• Portfolio audit conducted by Jantzi Research Associates

• ACF holdings moved to a segregated fund to allow the Foundation to direct proxy voting and shareholder engagement activities

• A set of customized proxy voting guidelines were developed with support of SHARE

• Moira Hutchinson joined the investment committee in 2006

• The Foundation hired SHARE to facilitate a shareholder engagement program focusing on precarious employment practices

Page 90: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

90

The Atkinson FoundationIdentifying a Focus

• Decided to focus their efforts initially on shareholder engagement for two main reasons:

• FIRST, the investment committee was comfortable with shareholder engagement as an initial strategy

• SECOND, they felt that shareholder engagement could be a complimentary strategy to the efforts of grassroots organizations that they were providing grants to

• Developed a shareholder engagement program focused on precarious employment practices in the commercial real estate sector

Page 91: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

91

The Atkinson FoundationTime for Action – Shareholder Engagement Strategy

• Engagement dialogues underway with two publicly traded companies

• Management meetings with companies to get more information on contracting practices

• Multi-stakeholder roundtable to consider the merit of devising a labour code of conduct or policy

• Working Group drafting a model labour code of conduct for the commercial property sector in Canada

• Research commissioned that will examine the business case for good labour practices in commercial property management

Page 92: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

93

The Atkinson FoundationKey Lessons…so far

• This takes time – moving from the theoretical to the practical proved to take several years in the realm of RI

• Working with the investment committee from the beginning is crucial and empathizing with their apprehensions

• There are many paths – need to find strategies that meet your foundations needs and work at a pace that decision-makers are comfortable with

• Small funds can make a difference• Change is slow but every step counts• “We are not done yet”

Page 93: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

94

V

Bibliography

Page 94: PRIMER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS OF CANADA PILOT PROJECT JULY 2008

95

Bibliography• Michael Jantzi, Responsible Investing for Foundations – An

Introduction, June 5/08

• Bob Walker, Shareholder Action, June 5/08

• Tim Draimin, Foundations’ Financial Innovation and Community Investing, June 5/08

• Derek Gent, Community Investing: A Practitioners Perspective, June 5/08

• Peter Chapman and Shannon Rohan, Responsible Investment Policy Development, June 5/08

• GEM, Sustainable Investing Handbook for Mission-Based Organizations, June 2008.