63
Principled Decision- Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett [email protected] 202.746.5444 The End game?

Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett [email protected] 202.746.5444 The Endgame? [email protected] The End

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Principled Decision-Making for Leaders &

TeamsPatrick F. Bassett

[email protected] 202.746.5444

The Endgame?

Page 2: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

How To Be Useful to your Head of School

Who’s Got the Monkey?

(“Houston, We’ve Got a Problem”)

Page 3: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Whose Got the Monkey?

I walk into the head’s office to say,“We have a problem – Mrs. Regalia in on the warpath….”

What’s the problem?

Page 4: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Difficult Conversations

Page 5: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most by Douglas Stone, Bruce

Patton, and Sheila Heen

How’s theproject coming?

Fine, thanks.

You’reholdingme up.

You’re a jerk.I hate you.

Levels: Stated vs. Implied. Business at hand vs. Threats to my image.

Page 6: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most by Douglas Stone, Bruce Patton,

and Sheila Heen

.Can it wait? I’m busy

Puzzle: Mishandled conversations create the very outcomes we dread.

She doesn’t get what my work demands..

Fine.

You think you’re only busy one?You don’t love me.

The Spouse/Partner Version

You’re a jerk.I hate you.

Page 7: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Leading from the…Middle

Page 8: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Positional Power We’re ambivalent about power: not sure

where the right balance is between coercion and freedom, power and persuasion, to secure the common good.

“The Imposter Phenomenon.”

Do you have all the authority you need to effect the change you want? Does the President?

Yes, if you follow Gandhi’s dictum “to be the change you want to see in the world.”

That’s where education comes in: the underutilized repertoire of non-coercive power.

Page 9: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Creating a Movement ~ Derek Sivers, Ted Talk

Page 10: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Creating a Movement – 4 Principles

1. A lone nut does something great...

(PFB: Leaders don’t have to be talented, just a bit crazy.)

2. …but no movement without the first follower.

(PFB: You can’t care too much about what others think or about the risk of looking crazy too.)

3. Cultivate and celebrate the first follower…

(PFB: Show the way, then honor the first followers.)

4. …or have the courage to be the first follower.

(PFB: Moral courage the 1st virtue: Be the John Hancock to Thomas Jefferson or the Reverend Abernathy to Martin Luther King, Jr.)

Page 11: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Lessons in Leadership from Montpelier

James Madison arrived at the Philadelphia Convention in 1787 with no positional power but a big idea. Instead of reforming the Articles of Confederation, abandon them. 1. Informational/Expertise Power: What does history tell us?2. Interpersonal/Relational Power: High EQ trumps all. “Neither a lender nor debtor be.”3. Associative Power: Networking. Tipping point leadership: Gladwell’s maven, connector, salesperson.

How Do You Lead without much positional power, in flat organizations? (Who has the positional power?)

Page 12: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Lessons in Leadership from Montpelier

Positional Power: Not that important or even effective, since without coercion, it’s rooted in the “willingness of the governed” to accept the dicta of people in power.

Leaders in the middle have little real “assigned” power: but that you have (expertise and relational and associative), learn to develop and extend it.

Leaders in the middle can and do change the world. Remember Margaret Meade’s observation: “Never underestimate the power of a handful of people to change the world. After all, it’s the only thing that ever does.”

Page 13: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Myers-Briggs Profiles

Page 14: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Myers-Briggs TypesYour Team’s Profile?

Our Profile E I S N T F J PTotals: 10 6 8 8 9 7 15 1

ESTJ ESFP INTJ ENFJ ENTJ ISTJ ISFJ ESFJ INFJ3 1 1 2 3 2 1 1 2

Page 15: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Z Decision-Making(What’s your Team’s Myers-Briggs Profile)

Page 16: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Myers-Briggs Z+2 Model I/E (introvert/extrovert); S/N (sensing/intuition); T/F (thinking/feeling); J/P (judging/perceiving)Adapted from The Zig-Zag ™ Process for Problem Solving, developed by Gordon D. Lawrence, Center for Applications

of Psychological Type, Inc., 2004.

How do you make decisions?

How do you process info?S (Sensing): What problem are we trying to solve?What are the facts, details, frequency?

N (iNtuition): What are the patterns and theories for why this might be happening? How do we brainstorm solutions?

T (Thinking): What are the criteria by which we should make this decision? What is the logical way to address the problem? The ethical dimensions?

F (Feeling): What is the impact on people? How can we deliver this info in the best way to get results?

See “slow thinking” process in the “Bassett Blog on the Horns of a Dilemma”

Page 17: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Dilemma Case Studies…

NAIS’s & YoursThe IGE (Institute for Global Ethics)

“Four-way Test)

Page 18: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

NAIS Case Study VignettesDownload films: http://client.blueskybroadcast.com/NAIS/case/

General Rule of Thumb: “Boards should err on the side of under-involvement in operational matters and over-involvement in reputational matters.” ~Dick Chait

A Role Play: What do you say when you get the “concerned parent” call?

IGE’s 4-Way Test: 1. gut test; 2. the legal test; 3. front-page test; 4. role-model test.

• NAIS Case Study #1 : Harsh Transitions in the Second Grade• NAIS Case Study #2 : Clash of Styles of Leaders• NAIS Case Study #9 : Administrative Evaluations• NAIS Case Study #11 : Digging Deeper for the Campaign• NAIS Case Study #13 : Taking Charge…by a Trustee• NAIS Case Study #29 : Anonymous Letter from the Faculty• NAIS Case Study #30 : Breaking the Rules…by the Adults• NAIS Case Study #31 : Admissions Package Deal

Z Decision-making manifest (S/N + T/F) in IGE’s 4-way test: i.) gut test ii.) legal test iii.) front page test; iv.) role model test

c: d:

Page 19: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Highly Functional vs. Dysfunctional Team(What’s your Team’s Functionality

Factor?)

Page 20: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Five Dysfunctions of a Team

Manifest by…

Paranoia

Page 21: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Five Dysfunctions of a Team

Page 22: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Five Dysfunctions of a Team

Page 23: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Five Elements of HighlyFunctional Teams

Page 24: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

5 Dysfunctions Survey ?s

Return

Page 25: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Five Dysfunctions of a Team

3 = usually; 2 = sometimes; 1 = rarely

0.0 0.00.00.00.0

Our Team’s Average Totals on Statements(higher scores better)

Page 26: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Understanding & Managing Change in

Change-Resistant Cultures

Page 27: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

What Leaders Really Do ~ John Kotter

Management:

Manages Complexity by…• Planning & Budgeting• Organizing & Staffing• Controlling & Problem-

solving• Producing predictability,

order, and consistency

Leadership:

Leads Change by…• Setting a direction• Aligning people• Motivating and inspiring• Producing useful and dramatic change

Examples of a board doing “the right thing”?

(i.e., “doing things right”) (i.e., “doing the right things”)

Page 28: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

NAIS Strategic Planning: Breakout Groups (partnerships; school of future; sustainability, etc.)

Why doesn’t anyone want to sit at the innovation table?A risk-averse culture…and client.

Page 29: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Seven Stages of the Change Cycle

Source: Center for Ethical Leadership (Bill Grace, Pat Hughes, & Pat Turner), Kellogg National Leadership Program Seminar, Snoqualine, WA, 7/10/97. Reference: William Bridges, Transitions; Kurt Lewin, Field Theory in Social Science; Virginia Satir, The Satir Model; George David, Compressed Experience Workplace Simulation; Elizabeth Kubler-Ross, On Death & Dying; Tom Peters, In Search of Excellence.

The research on change indicates that there are predictable stages individuals experience whenever a major change event appears. What are they?

An Exercise: Identify 2 major change events in your life Indicate the stages you went through as the change

occurred. As a small group determine what stages you had in

common despite differences in the change events you were thinking of.

Page 30: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

The Seven Stages of the Change Cycle

Source: Center for Ethical Leadership (Bill Grace, Pat Hughes, & Pat Turner), Kellogg National Leadership Program Seminar, Snoqualine, WA, 7/10/97. Reference: William Bridges, Transitions; Kurt Lewin, Field Theory in Social Science; Virginia Satir, The Satir Model; George David, Compressed Experience Workplace Simulation; Elizabeth Kubler-Ross, On Death & Dying; Tom Peters, In Search of Excellence.

1. Business as Usual: the routine; the frozen state; the status quo

2. External Threat: potential disaster; propitious change event; an ending; a “death in the family”; an unfreezing via the introduction of a foreign element; disequilibrium; dissatisfaction with the status quo.

3. Denial: refusal to read the Richter scale; anger and rage; chaos.

Page 31: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

The Seven Stages of the Change Cycle

4. Mourning: confusion; depression.

5. Acceptance: letting go.

6. Renewal: creativity; the incubation state of new ideas and epiphanies; new beginnings; movement; vision of what “better” might look like; reintegration; first practical steps; practice of new routines.

7. New Structure: sustainable change; the new status quo; new “frozen” state of restored equilibrium; spiritual integration; internalization and transformation of self.

Page 32: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Overcoming Resistance to Change

Conventional Wisdom: Raise the Volume… Declare war, demonize the enemy, mobilize the

public

Problems with Raising the Volume in School Culture… Skepticism: Teachers are intellectuals--declarations

of imminent collapse are met with suspicion. Good is the enemy of great: Jim Collins’ Good to

Great. Absence of provoking crisis makes avoidance easy.

Page 33: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Overcoming Resistance to Change

Problems with Raising the Volume in School Culture… Success: Track record of independent schools the

greatest impediment to change: We can’t declare war when schools are enjoying decades of peace and prosperity. So why advocate change???? Increasingly the public identifies high quality schools with

innovativeness, and least identifies innovativeness with independent schools.

The independent school model may not be financially sustainable in it current incarnation of skyrocketing tuitions.

What’s best for kids needs to be reasserted as institutions almost always over time gravitate towards doing what’s best for adults.

Page 34: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Effecting Change

Developing Followership for Change:

Coercive model works (“We’re about to close unless all faculty including department chairs teach five classes instead of four with 20-25 kids in each class”)…

…but it works at a high cost to morale.

Appeal to idealism works (“We have an opportunity to create a new model here and become pioneers”)…

…but it works only if you have a highly committed “band of brothers & sisters” and strong, visionary, and inspirational leadership.

Page 35: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Effecting Change

Developing Buy-in for Change:

Mutual benefit (“What’s in it for me?”) model works (“Beyond supporting this direction because ‘it’s the right thing to do,’ we are designing a new framework that is mutually beneficial to the school and its staff”)…

…but it works only if you build in significant incentives.

Page 36: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Effecting Change

Alternative to Conventional Wisdom (Raise the Volume)…Lower the Noise…By… Talking about/Personalizing Change: Anticipating the Seven Stages

Betting on the Fastest Horses

Page 37: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Acknowledging Denial & Mourning

All change begins not with a beginning but an ending.

• Example: Getting married = end of…being single unconditional love (cf. Rob Evans)having your own bathroom (and towels)the sports car

Page 38: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Effecting Change

Abstracting and Personalizing Change

Faculty exercise: What are your own major change events? A move? Marriage? Admin job? Can we predict & prepare for stages?

Page 39: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Change Agency: Bet on the Fast Horses

Main Impediment to Change: Consensus model of decision making. (“My biggest challenge is convincing my faculty members that they are not self-employed.”) ~Lou Salza

Coalition-building Model: Betting on the Fastest Horses: targeted buy-in via modeling. Ride the “tipping point” horses. (Malcolm Gladwell’s mavens, connectors, and salespeople).

Recruiting “the coalition of the willing.” Margaret Mead Dictum: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.”

Page 40: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Overcoming Resistance to Change

Page 41: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Immunity to Change

What examples in our personal or professional lives do we find ourselves or others “immune to change,” even when we know it’s in our best interests to change?

Page 42: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Robert Kegan’s Immunity to Change

Well-Intentioned Goals:

Case Study 1:Quitting Smoking

-----------

Intentions and Actions: The Gap

Page 43: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Robert Kegan’s Immunity to Change

Well-Intentioned Goals:

Behaviors I Do/Don’t Do that Undermine Goal

Quitting Smoking

Page 44: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Robert Kegan’s Immunity to Change

Well-Intentioned Goals:

Behaviors I Do/Don’t Do that Undermine Goal

Quitting Smoking Sneaking an occasional smoke

Rewarding myself with a smoke.

Page 45: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Robert Kegan’s Immunity to Change

Well-Intentioned Goals:

Behaviors I Do/Don’t Do that Undermine Goal

Invisible Competing Drivers

Quitting Smoking

Sneaking an occasional smoke

Rewarding myself with a smoke.

Page 46: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Robert Kegan’s Immunity to Change

Well-Intentioned Goals:

Behaviors I Do/Don’t Do that Undermine Goal

Invisible Competing Drivers

Quitting Smoking Sneaking an occasional smoke

Smoking as pleasurable pastime

Rewarding myself with a smoke.

Smoking as anxiety reliever

Smoking as oral fixation preferable to eating/weight gain

Foot on gas……………………and on brake

Page 47: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Robert Kegan’s Immunity to Change

Well-Intentioned Goals:

Behaviors I Do/Don’t Do that Undermine Goal

Invisible Competing Drivers

Big, Untested AssumptionsBehind Col 3Drivers

Quitting Smoking

Sneaking an occasional smoke

Smoking as pleasurable pastime

I can’t find equally pleasurable alternatives

Rewarding myself with a smoke.

Smoking as anxiety reliever

I might become someone who is not me

Smoking as oral fixation preferable to eating/weight gain

Page 48: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Robert Kegan’s Immunity to Change

Well-Intentioned Goals:

Case Study 2:Be an Innovator

Lead the Change Agenda

Page 49: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Robert Kegan’s Immunity to Change

Well-Intentioned Goals:

Behaviors I Do/Don’t Do that Undermine Goal

PFB Case Study 2:Be a Change Agent

Lead the Change Agenda

Page 50: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Robert Kegan’s Immunity to Change

Well-Intentioned Goals:

Behaviors I Do/Don’t Do that Undermine Goal

Case Study 2:Be a Change Agent

Fail to align resources and incentives

Lead the Change Agenda

Make the case for the rider but not the elephant

Page 51: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Robert Kegan’s Immunity to Change

Well-Intentioned Goals:

Behaviors I Do/Don’t Do that Undermine Goal

Invisible Competing Drivers

Case Study 2:Be a Change Agent

Fail to align resources and incentives

Lead the Change Agenda

Make the case for the rider but not the elephant

Page 52: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Robert Kegan’s Immunity to Change

Well-Intentioned Goals:

Behaviors I Do/Don’t Do that Undermine Goal

Invisible Competing Drivers

Be a Change Agent Fail to align resources and incentives

Keeping peace more important than effecting change

Lead the Change Agenda

Make the case for the rider but not the elephant

Fear that you won’t have followers; that the change won’t work - seen as a failure

Page 53: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Robert Kegan’s Immunity to Change

Well-Intentioned Goals:

Behaviors I Do/Don’t Do that Undermine Goal

Invisible Competing Drivers

Big, Untested AssumptionsBehind Col 3Drivers

Be a Change Agent

Fail to align resources and incentives

Keeping peace more important than effecting change

Lead the Change Agenda

Make the case for the rider but not the elephant

Fear that the change won’t work - seen as a failure; fear change agent punished

Page 54: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Robert Kegan’s Immunity to Change

Well-Intentioned Goals:

Behaviors I Do/Don’t Do that Undermine Goal

Invisible Competing Drivers

Big, Untested AssumptionsBehind Col 3Drivers

Be a Change Agent

Fail to align resources and incentives

Keeping peace more important than effecting change

No one wants change

Lead the Change Agenda

Make the case for the rider but not the elephant

Fear that the change won’t work - seen as a failure; fear change agent punished

Failure will be punished instead of trying being rewarded

Page 55: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

(Not) The End!What are the 1-3 leadership principles

I’d like to work on? 1-3 our team needs to work on?

Return

Page 56: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Tiananmen Square

Return

Page 57: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Difficult Conversations between the Head & Board Chair

Difficult Conversation Role Plays

Page 58: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Difficult Conversations between the Head & Board Chair

School Head to Board Chair: “I’d say that at least half of our board members, mostly current parents, despite all of the articles and board workshops we’ve conducted with the experts, at the end of the day want to weigh in and “fix” problems they and their circle of parents experience or imagine. They really want to do my job, and they shrink away from doing their job, which is to think strategically and advance the school in every way, including fund-raising. I’m about to throw in the towel.”

Board chair to School Head: …

Page 59: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Difficult Conversations between the Head & Board Chair

Board chair to head of school: “I know that last summer you and I and the Executive Committee hammered out some goals for the board and some goals for you relative to the strategic plan to be the basis of this year’s evaluation of you as head of school, and so far, so good. But given the recent uproar about the “Black Lives Matter” assembly, there’s some pressure to add some categories to the evaluation. Related to that, there’s a group of trustees who think your evaluation should include a 360 with input that we see from the faculty, staff, parents, and board in terms of your overall leadership style and effectiveness. We do this in our firm, and it’s a clarifying experience. Are you game for these changes in your evaluation process?”

School Head to board chair: …

Page 60: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Difficult Conversations between the Head & Board Chair

School Head to Board Chair: “I really appreciate the fact that whenever we discuss very sensitive matters at the board meeting you remind the board that the information is confidential and not to be shared outside of the board room. I’m sorry to report to you that one of the faculty members heard one of our trustees and your wife discussing the matter with some non-board member parents and faculty members in the parking lot. From my perspective, this is a harmful breach of our basic rules of conduct and best practice. Any ideas on how to address it?”

Board chair to school head: …

Page 61: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Difficult Conversations between the Head & Board Chair

Board chair to head of school: “Many members of our board have been approached by faculty members and members of your admin team regarding the issue of perceived favoritism in setting salaries. I continue to counsel my colleagues on the board to rebuff these approaches because these are internal matters the head is assigned to address, and not our business to get involved in. But the pattern persists because many say they’ve repeatedly raised the issue with you, but you won’t address it. Help me understand the situation.”

Head to board chair: …

Page 62: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Difficult Conversations between the Head & Board Chair School head to board chair: “The board has made it clear

to me that it wants a wholesome, drug and alcohol-free environment a the school, and we’ve strengthened the handbook to extend school reach outside the environs of the school for serious student breaches that break our rules of conduct. As you know, a drug or alcohol citation by the police would now carry with it school disciplinary consequences, as all our students and parents know when they sign the handbook clause as part of the year’s re-enrollment contract. So I want you to know we’ve learned that one of our families is “aiding and abetting” senior class parties at their home under the excuse that it’s better for the drinking (and I suspect the drug use) to be in supervised quarters with no driving allowed, than at large. We need to make an example of this family. But when I’ve mentioned this to a couple of trustees, they’ve warned me off, saying its an overreach on the part of the school. Maybe they think it’s a good idea or maybe their kids are at those parties, I don’t know. What do you think?”

Board chair to school head: …

Page 63: Principled Decision-Making for Leaders & Teams Patrick F. Bassett Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com 202.746.5444 The Endgame? Bassett@HeadsUpEd.com The End

Difficult Conversations between the Head & Board Chair

Board chair to school head: “You know that I understand the difficulty of your position regarding our senior faculty member whose been a legendary contributor at the school or decades. The word on the street is that she’s still sharp, knows the kids and their learning styles, and gets a lot out of them. But apparently she also is increasingly sharp-tongued with them, and parents are perceiving her to be short-tempered, overly strict, and very critical of their children. I know you’re trying to mentor her, but apparently it’s not sticking. And I know she’s an icon among her colleagues. But the board is getting pressure to pressure you to act on this more assertively. Any thoughts?”

Head to board chair: “…

Return