Process Decision

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    1/31

    When process decisions made?

    New or modified product/service to be offered

    Quality to be improved

    Competitive priorities have changed

    Demand for product/service is changing

    Cost/availability of inputs have changed

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    2/31

    Positioning

    The positioning strategy - whether

    resources are organised around the product

    or process.

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    3/31

    Key variables

    Factors

    Vertical

    integrationCustomer

    involvement

    Resource

    flexibilityCapitalintensity

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    4/31

    Volume of production

    Degree of customisation

    Key variables

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    5/31

    Vertical Integration (VI)

    The degree to which a firm owns (production)

    system to handle the entire chain of processes.

    Higher degree of handling, greater VI

    Types of VI:

    Backward integration: Firm moves towards sources of

    raw materials and parts (e.g. buying out suppliers)

    Forward integration: Firm acquires more channels of

    distribution (e.g. own warehouse, distribution centres)

    Rao

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    6/31

    Vertical Integration: Consider

    Cost of producing resources

    Efficiency in producing resources

    Market penetration (see the IBM-Mitsubishi story)

    Need for Resource flexibility (investmenttied up)

    Tolerance of low range of acceptablebusiness opportunities

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    7/31

    Resource flexibility (RF)

    The ease for employees and equipment to

    be able to handle a wide variety of

    products, output levels, duties and

    functions.- Higher degree of ease, greater

    flexibility

    RF can be affected by vertical integration

    when more resources are tied up in

    covering new tasks.

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    8/31

    Customer involvement

    The extent of involvement in the

    production process

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    9/31

    Capital intensity

    The degree of mixture of equipment and

    skill in the production process.

    The greater the relative cost of equipment,the greater is capital intensity.

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    10/31

    PROCESS STRATEGIES

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    11/31

    Process strategies

    Involves determination of how to produce aproduct or provide a service

    Objective

    Meet or exceed customer requirements

    Meet cost & managerial goals

    Has long-run effects

    Product & volume flexibility Costs & quality

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    12/31

    Fit ofProcess, Volume, and Variety

    Process focus

    projects, jobshops,(machine, print,

    carpentry)

    Standard Register

    Repetitive

    (autos, motorcycles)

    Harley Davidson Product focus

    (commercial baked

    goods, steel, glass)

    Nucor Steel

    High Variety

    One or few units perrun, high variety

    (allows customization)

    Changes in modules

    Modest runs, standardized

    modules

    Changes in attributes

    (such as grade, quality,

    size, thickness, etc.)

    Long runs only

    Mass

    Customization(difficult to achieve,but huge rewards)

    Dell Computer Co.

    Poor strategy

    Low-Volume

    (Intermittent)

    Repetitive Process

    (Modular)High-Volume

    (Continuous)

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    13/31

    Types of process strategies

    Process strategies follow a continuum. Within a

    given facility, several strategies may be used

    Continuum

    Repetitive-Focused

    Product-Focused

    Process-Focused

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    14/31

    Process focused strategies

    Facilities are organized by process

    Similar processes are together

    Example: All drill presses are together

    Low volume, high variety products

    Jumbled flow

    Other names

    Intermittent process

    Job shop

    OperationProduct A

    Product B

    11 22 33

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    15/31

    Process focused strategies: Example

    Bank

    1995 Corel Corp.

    Machine

    Shop 1995 Corel Corp.

    Hospital 1995

    Corel

    Corp.

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    16/31

    Process Focused Strategy: Pros & Cons

    Advantages

    Greater product flexibility

    More general purpose equipment

    Lower initial capital investment

    Disadvantages

    More highly trained personnel More difficult production planning & control

    Low equipment utilization (5% to 25%)

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    17/31

    Repetitive Focused Strategy

    Facilities often organized by assembly lines

    Characterized by modules

    Parts & assemblies made previously

    Modules combined for many outputoptions

    Other names

    Assembly line

    Production line

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    18/31

    Repetitive Focused Strategy: Considerations

    More structured than process-focused, less

    structured than product focused

    Enables quasi-customization

    Using modules, it enjoys economic

    advantage of continuous process, and

    custom advantage of low-volume, high-variety model

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    19/31

    Repetitive-Focused Strategy: Examples

    Truck

    ClothesDryer

    1995 Corel Corp.

    FastFood

    McDonaldsover 95 billion served

    .

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    20/31

    Product-Focused Strategy

    Facilities are organized by product

    High volume, low variety products

    Where found

    Discrete unit manufacturing

    Continuous process manufacturing

    Other names

    Line flow production Continuous production

    Operation

    Products A & B

    1 2 3

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    21/31

    Product-Focused Strategy:

    Pros & Cons

    Advantages

    Lower variable cost per unit

    Lower but more specialized labor skills

    Easier production planning and control

    Higher equipment utilization (70% to 90%)

    Disadvantages

    Lower product flexibility More specialized equipment

    Usually higher capital investment

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    22/31

    Product-Focused Examples

    Light Bulbs

    (Discrete)

    Paper(Continuous)

    .

    1995 Corel

    Corp.

    Soft Drinks(Continuous,

    thenDiscrete)

    MassFlu Shots

    (Discrete)

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    23/31

    Mass Customization

    Using technology and imagination torapidly mass-produce products that cater tosatisfy unique customer desires.

    Under mass customization the threeprocess models become so flexible thatdistinctions between them become blur,making variety and volume issues less

    significant.

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    24/31

    Table of Summary

    Process Focus

    (Low volume,

    High variety)

    Repetitive

    Focus

    (Modular)

    Product focus

    (High-volume,

    low-variety)

    Mass

    Customization

    (High-volume,

    high-variety)1. Small quantity,

    large variety of

    products

    Long runs,

    standardized

    product, from

    modules

    Large quantity,

    small variety of

    products

    Large quantity,

    large variety of

    products

    2. Generalpurpose

    equipment

    Specialequipment aids

    in use of

    assembly line

    Specialpurpose

    equipment

    Rapidchangeover on

    flexible

    equipment

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    25/31

    Table of Summary (contd)

    Process Focus Repetitive

    Focus

    Product

    focus

    Mass

    Customization

    3 Broadly skilled

    operators

    Modestly

    trained

    employees

    Operators

    less broadly

    skilled

    Flexible operators

    trained for

    customization

    4 Many

    instructions

    because of

    change in jobs

    Reduced

    training and

    number of job

    instructions

    Few work

    orders and job

    instructions

    Custom orders

    require many

    instructions

    5 Raw material

    high relative to

    product value

    JIT techniques

    used

    Raw material

    low relative to

    product value

    Raw material low

    relative to product

    value

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    26/31

    Table of Summary (contd)

    Process Focus Repetitive Focus Product focus Mass

    Customization

    6 WIP high

    relative to output

    JIT techniques

    used

    WIP low relative

    to output

    WIP driven

    down by JIT,

    kanban, lean

    production

    7 Units move

    slowly thru plant

    Movement

    measured in

    hours & days

    Units move

    swiftly thru

    facility

    Goods move

    swiftly thru

    facility

    8 Finished goods

    made to order,

    not stored

    Finished goods

    made to frequent

    forecasts

    Finished goods

    made to forecast,

    then stored

    Finished goods

    made to order

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    27/31

    Process

    Focus

    Repetitive

    Focus

    Product focus Mass

    Customization

    9 Scheduling

    complex and

    concerned withtrade-off

    between

    inventory,

    capacity, and

    customer

    service

    Scheduling

    based on

    buildingmodels from a

    variety of

    forecasts

    Scheduling

    relatively

    simple,concerns

    establishing

    sufficient rate

    of output to

    meet forecasts

    Scheduling

    sophisticated to

    accommodatecustomization

    10 Fixed costs

    low, variable

    costs high

    Fixed costs

    dependent on

    flexibility of

    facilities

    Fixed costs

    high, variable

    costs low

    Fixed costs high;

    variable costs

    must be low

    Table of Summary (contd)

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    28/31

    Process Focus Repetitive

    Focus

    Product focus Mass

    Customization

    11 Costing, done

    by job, isestimated prior to

    doing job but

    only known after

    doing job

    Costs usually

    known based onexperience

    Because of high

    fixed costs, costdependent on

    utilization of

    capacity

    High fixed costs

    and dynamicvariable costs

    Table of Summary (contd)

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    29/31

    Process Continuum

    Process Focused

    (intermittent process)

    Repetitive

    Focus

    (assembly

    line)

    Product Focused

    (continuous

    process)

    Continuum

    High variety, low volume

    Low utilization (5% - 25%)

    General-purpose equipment

    Low variety, high volume

    High utilization (70% - 90%)

    Specialized equipment

    Modular

    Flexible equipment

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    30/31

    Volume and Variety ofProducts

    ProductsVariety Process Process Low Variety

    units per lot ProjectsVery small runs, high Job Shops

    Modest runs, modestRepetitive

    variations RepetitiveVery long runs, Continuous

    Equipment utilization 20%-75% 70%-80%

    Poor Strategy

    (High variable

    costs)

    MassCustomization

    One or very few

    variety

    variety

    changes inattributes

    Long runs, modest

    5%-25%

    Volume and Low Volume High Repetitive High VolumeVariety of

    (Intermittent) (Modular)(Continuous)

    Process

  • 8/2/2019 Process Decision

    31/31

    Rapid throughputtechniques

    Mass Customization

    Modular techniques

    Repetitive FocusModular design

    Flexible equipment

    Product-focusedLow variety, high volumeHigh utilization (70% - 80%)

    Specialized equipment

    Process-focusedHigh variety, low volumeLow utilization (5% - 20%)

    General purpose equipment

    Effective schedulingtechniques

    Process Strategies