Program Executive Office Command, Control, … Executive Office Command, Control, Communications, ... PEO C4I Organizational Structure 3. ... Why We Find Issues - Examples • Installation

Integrated Information Warfare for the

21st CenturyPEOC4I.NAVY.MIL

Program Executive OfficeCommand, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (PEO C4I)

24 October 2017CAPT Andrew Gibbons

Program Manager (PMW 750)858.537.8909

[email protected]

PMW 750 Carrier and Air Integration Program Office Briefing to NDIA

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited (23 OCTOBER 2017)

PMW 750’s Mission

2

ORG SCN NMP A/SI KTR dep

750

750750750

750

760750

750

PMW 750 provides Platform C4I integration support to the Surface Warfare & Naval Aviation Enterprises

Deliver integrated, joint, and coalition-interoperable C4I capabilities for our Navy’s aircraft carriers, force-level

amphibious ships, command ships, and aircraft

3

ORG ICE SCN NMP A/SI KTR dep

PEO C4I Organizational Structure

3

PMW 750 Strategic Goals

4

Deliver fully operational “State of the Fleet” C4I System of Systems while reducing delivery costs to the sponsor and total operating cost to the Navy

Force Level

New Construction

TacMobile Enable Commander Patrol Reconnaissance Group (CPRG) Vision 2025

Air/Sea

Integration

Full integration with NAVAIR and PEO C4I as a critical PMW for accomplishing integrated capability strategic

initiatives

Force Level

ModernizationDrive ship C4I Integration left in a sustainable and repeatable manner, driving out cost and complexity

ICEInstitute Definable, Repeatable, and Sustainable C4I-

Baseline Integration and Interoperability for C4I-Baseline platform integration


Background: Current C4I POR deliveries are semi-coordinated with the C4I-baseline integration left to the Naval Planning Yards (PY) who possess no expertise in C4I design. This delegation of responsibility comes at a HUGE COST in Change Orders

5ICE allows PEO C4I to leverage best of SCN processes for Navy modernization

SCN PMW 700

FID Element

PMW 700

Platform FID

PMW 100

POR IRD

Shipyard

Builds to SID

NM

P Shipyard

Builds to SID

PMW 700

CBD

PMW 100

POR IRD

PMW 700

Platform FIDPMW 700

FID Element

PMW 700

CBDPlanning

Yard SID

Planning

Yard SID

Proven

Has not existed

TodaySID: Ship Installation DrawingFID: Functional Interface DiagramCBD: Configuration Baseline Diagram IRD: Installation Requirements DocumentSCN: Shipbuilding & Conversion, NavyNMP: Navy Modernization Process

Successful

First-Pass

C4I baseline

integration

into Ship’s

baseline

ICE Process

ICE added value

PMW 100 IRD/GFI

Negotiated

platformbaseline

Certified

Platform

-specific

FID

Sys SOVT

PlatformSOVTFID-E P-FID

…A-84 A-36 A-30 A-22 A-17 A-12 A-9 ------Avail------ Certification Day

SOTSID

ICE’s success is based on early enterprise coordination

100 Club 700 Club FRD 200

• A 5-step process including temporal and event-based actions• 100, 700-Club, and the FRD offer Should Cost opportunities• Aggregated Should Cost opportunities savings of up to $67M for NMP ships

(FY20-26)

6


SOVT: System Operations & Verification TestSOT: System-of-systems Operational TestGFI: Government Furnished Information

Background: Deliver systems “Just in Time” to Shipbuilding & Conversion, Navy (SCN) platforms that are not at risk to be removed during the first post delivery availability

7The aft module of John F. Kennedy (CVN 79) is super-lifted into

drydock

PMW 750 SCN Integration Efforts• Baseline Management

Manage over $100M of funding and schedules for all C4I/SPAWAR systems per platformUse Cost Plus Fixed-Fee(CPFF) and Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contracts

• Systems Design and IntegrationDesign and develop C4I engineering drawing packages housed in 150+ racks and using 3,100+ drops per platformManage inter-systems interfaces (i.e. Functional Interface Drawings (FID))Develop and assess Engineering Change Proposals

• Radio Communication Systems (RCS), Distributed Systems (DS), and Ship’s Signal Exploitation Space (SSES) Production, Integration, and Test Facilities

Integrate and test radio communication System of Systems (SoS)Design, build, and integrate 55+ racks of C4I and ancillary equipmentDevelop platform test procedures

• Manage shipboard C4I installation and tests• Expanded responsibilities with CVN 73 that now include overall Zone

Integration and C4I MQ-25A modifications

8PMW 750 Delivers all C4I for new construction CVNs and LHAs


• PMW 750 leads design, production, test, shipboard installation, and post-delivery support to integrate over 150 racks across 30+ systems

• Each hull is a “rollover” from previous hull of same Ship Class Changes are limited to obsolescence and End of Life issues

PMW 750 SCN Loading

9

Phase IPlanning and Requirements

Phase IIDesign &

Procurement

Phase IIIProduction,

TIF & Lab Test

Phase IVShipboard

Install & Test

Phase VPost-Delivery

SupportShip

Delivery

OWLD

PMS

377

FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24

PH. III

FY16

LHA X PH. IV PH. V

LHA Y PH. I PH. II PH. III PH. IV PH. V

PMS

378/

9 CVN XX PH. IV PH. V

CVN YY PH. II PH. III PH. IV PH. V

CVN ZZ PH. II PH. III PH. IV

PMS

312 CVN AA PH. IV PH. V

CVN BB

CVN CC

Lessons learned in LHA X & CVN XX feed Design/TIF of CVN YY

PH. IIIPH. II PH. IV PH. V

PH. I

Concurrent PH. III bet. CVN BB & YY allows for knowledge and resource sharing

PH. IIIPH. IIBaseline “rolled over” to CVN BB PH. IV PH. V

Knowledge sharing across platforms reduces costand ensures System-of-Systems success through all Phases


Background: Fleet wants our C4I systems to come to them fully integrated, easy to use and easy to maintain

10

Fleet Engagement

11

SOT Director

Carrier Class Desk

LHA/LHD Class Desk

PMS 407 Liaison &LCC Class Desk

Senior USMC Liaison PEO C4I Liaison to PEO Carriers

Special Operations Forces Liaison


Modernization RoadmapAligning Common Processes across the PEO

2004 Pre-2015 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2025 Vision

Strike Group efforts:• Assessing C5I / Air Compatibility by Warfare

Mission Area

SOF C4I Liaison:• Provide Engineering support for

Interoperability of shipboard

SOFrequirements

Air ISRAT:• Leverage existing NAVAIR

Council of Captains and A/SI EXCOMM

Configuration Baseline Diagrams (CBDs) standardized:

Software Exemption:• Design Navy Modernization Plan (NMP) exception for

Strike Force Interoperability (SFI)

Category 3 and above software

Rightsizing Availabilities:• Worked with

NAVSEA to identify avails that needed to be lengthened

Installation Readiness Review

(IRR):• Revamped to

concentrate on issues requiring

O-6 decisions

Platform CCBs:• Instituted methodical

process to identify platform risks and

issues• Captures ‘seams’

issues such as interdependencies and

testing

Synchronized Fielding Plans:

• Developed process for building a PEO C4I fielding plan

tied to the current budget controls

BISOG Flag and O6 VTCs:• Reenergized

process for identifying

BISOG solutions

SOT All FL Ships:

• TYCOMs and SPAWAR split

costs

Removal of Obsolete & Abandoned Equipment:

• Identified process for identifying and determining best

disposition options

Highlighted Shock Testing:• Identified all

outstanding Shock Deficiency Correction Plans

FFC’s Strike Group Wholeness Initiative:

• Leverage FFC’seffort by sharing a single authoritative

assessment tool

• 25 C4I systems included in ship’s only C4I end to end diagram that documents the last known configuration

• Teamed with FRD to provide the CBD as the ship’s network topology for Cyber Inspections

Future Opportunities

Toda

y

Past Successes

12

Platform Modernization process initiatives are improving interoperability, driving costs down, and helping speed to capability

Near Real Time Configuration Management:

• Knowing a ship’s current cyber threat surface based on what hardware/ software is running, as well as how

the system is OPERATIONALLY

configured.

Automated Afloat Software Monitoring and Management:

• Networked services that are self-healing, w/Damage Control

for warfighting systems, and other ways to integrate

aspects of the many afloat systems that were not designed

together but should be able to be

monitored and managed together.

N2N6 Fund SOT:• Saves TYCOMs

from paying


C4I SOTTests Mission Threads

Why We Find Issues - Examples• Installation Mis-Alignment/Not Coordinated

SOVTs occur at various times during availability, executed by different organizations

• No integrated testing without SOTNewly installed systems have the potential to break carefully tuned network configurations

• SOVT completion does not equal operational capability

SOT uncovers discrepancies in design, integration, documentation (IRDs, TDPs, and SIDs) and ultimately SOVT

• Lack of authoritative documentation and training for the Fleet

Return on Investment is significant, but hard to quantify -Provides fixes earlier & documents known-good C4I suite

13

C4I SOT Issue Resolution Process

Identify Track Assign Work Resolve Document

Implement Fix

Develop Fix

Notify PMW 100

SPAWAR 5.0 DB

SOT Issue

CBD Updated

SOT Participants Force Level

Unit Level

750/FRD SOT Core Team 5 2

SOT Subject Matter Experts X X

SSC PACIFIC's BMDS Test Bed (BTS) X X

Ship’s Force C5I System operators and maintainers (IT/ET/OS/CT/EW) X X

DGSIT, TYCOMs, ESGs, SYSCOMs, USFF, TTGs, CPRG, HSM/C Wings X

Embarking Units: USMC, Staffs & Air Wings X

Participating Units: P-8s, MH60s & ships X


14

• PMW 750 team understands the overall requirements (big “R”) and helps program offices resolve readiness and integration issues and gaps (little “r”).

F-35 Post-flight mission data to DCGS-N (JPO, PMW 120, PMW 130, PMW 160, E2C Lab)F-35 ALIS integration and performance on Navy SATCOM networks (JPO, E2C Lab, PMW 160, FRD 100)MQ-4C Logistic Management System integration with Navy networks (PMA-262, PMW 150, PMW 790, PMW 160)E-2D COTS Airborne router integration with ADNS (PMA-231, PMW 160, SSC PAC)MQ-25A Advanced Networking Tactical System (ANTS) development (PMA-268, PMW 160, SSC PAC)P-8A Unclassified Video Dissemination for HLD missions (PMA-290, PMW 130, PMW 120)

• Funding by Program Offices for A/SI support varies greatly:JPO/Joint Strike Fighter = $0.15M/yearPMA-231/E-2D Hawkeye = $1-3M/yearPMA-262/MQ-4C Triton = $3M+/yearPMA-268/MQ-25A Stingray = $11M+/year

Fleet Visibility & Focus

Resource Commitment

Early NAVAIR investment reduces seams issues

OpportunityAirborne WAN PoR Establishment

20042004 2008 2011 2014 2016 2017 2018 2021

• ADNS is the Navy Tactical WAN serving as the entryway into the DoDIN• No PoR form factor to support Air Platforms – results in multiple solutions from NAVAIR

Airborne platform PMAs have requirements and have funded independent solutions Over $60M investing in uncoordinated Airborne solution

Unique solutions and products with separate life cycle management effortsAsynchronous Cybersecurity approaches

E-2C Air ADNS

AN/USQ-144(V)8

“The Toaster”

DASN (RDT&E)funded RTT for E-2C Airborne ADNS Router

(Qty:42)

E-2C

Air ADNS

Fielding

RTT Funding/$10M UCA/$30M, MQ-4/$7M, E-2D/$10M

UCLASS

Triton

PMA-268 and PMA-262 begin

funding development of Air WAN system

NAVAIR COIEstablished

Airborne ADNSSPS developed and signed by NAVAIR and

PEO C4I

Air WAN GFE labeled ANTS

PMA-231 begins funding E-2D

Air WAN system development

E-2C/D

NAVAIR Summit

A/SI EXCOMM

P-8A IOC for Inc 3 Block 2 with ADNS

PMW 160 POM19 issue

sheet

PMA-231 ends ANTS funding

PMA-262 selects COTS vs ANTS

NAVAIR and PEO C4I

commitment and direction to establish

Airborne ADNSProgram of

Record

Airborne ADNSProgram of

Record establishment

OPNAV funding

Responsible PMA/PMWidentified

Airborne

ADNS

PoR

$

$

Single

modular and scalable ADNS

PoR product for multiple

platforms

Onramp PoRSystem to E-2D

Onramp PoRSystem to

MQ-4C Multi-Int

Initial Airborne Router Capability

OPNAV

Funding

Moved


15We anticipate ADNS airborne resolution within POM20

OpportunityCentralized FMV Integration

Today in the Fleet Near Future Strategic Goal

• Demand and Requirement for reliable and streaming/networked FMV increasing • Uncoordinated efforts and no PoR for Enterprise FMV results in multiple solutions

Independently funded and duplication of efforts with no clarity on standardsUnique solutions and products with no sustainment or training planNon-networked and asynchronous Cybersecurity approaches

• Classic integration “seams” issue between multiple PoRs (and Operational vs Intelligence requirements) adversely impacting Fleet

Multiple NAVAIR and SPAWAR

Tech exchanges on FMV

capability

Non-Standard

Installation

Of Unique Solutions

Integrated and centralized C4I

architecture that streamlines FMVafloat and ashore

for Integrated Fires

TacmobileFMV Demo

System

for P-8A HLDmission

USMC focus

on F-35B FMV

Capabilities

Triton FMV E2C lab events

1

3

NTCDL

CONOPSStudy

ICOP

2P-3 FMV via INMARSAT

RQ-21 Blackjack

# Implementation Closure Criteria

1 Stand-Up Airborne FMV COI Enterprise Strategy and Governance structure for Navy FMV developed

2 Employ Kill Chain approach to resource FMV capabilities

OPNAV N2/N6 and N98 resourcing aligned across platforms and systems

3 Define and standardize Navy FMV afloat and ashore architecture

FMV platforms / systems to use standards and defined architecture as defined by Airborne FMV COI


16Recent DoD Guidance on expedited delivery of unclas FMV adding criticality

FAKCruise Boxes

CommsAcoustic Replay

Mission Planning (PID)Future – ISR/FMV

MTOC

65,000 lbs

TOC

AORHub

Spoke

• MDA: PEO C4I• ACAT III Weapons System

Mission Planning, Mission Execution, Post-Mission Analysis• TacMobile enables P-8A, Advanced Airborne Sensor (AAS) and

MQ-4C Triton schedules (ACAT I PORs)TacMobile Increment 2.1.x is fielding todayTacMobile Increment 3.x is pre-MS C (Q1FY21)

• TacMobile is Tactical Operations Centers (TOCs), Mobile

Tactical Operations Centers (MTOCs)

and Fly Away Kits (FAKs)

17TacMobile provides critical Mission Cycle tools for MPRF Weapons Systems

TacMobileAcquisition Status

TacMobile RoadmapShaping TacMobile to CPRG Vision 2025

18

2004

Inc 1

Inc 1

Pre-2004 2004 2005 2006 2009 2012 2016 2017 2018 2021 2023-2026

• FRP for shore Sites (TSC and MOCC )

Inc 1

Inc 3Design

incl.

• ABA,

ASW SIGINT, MAC-E,

Higher Than Secret ops

TR 2.1.1.2• Fielding:

• Comms upgrades

(HF, Assured C2)

• P-8A Inc 3 Blk 1

ECPs 4 & 5

•AAS Operational

•Triton EOC

TR 2.1.2.0• Architecture &

Network modernization

• NATO network• Facilities refresh

• Triton IOC

Inc 3

• Mobile C2

• P-3C Support

• GCCS-M POR

• Non-C2 comms,mobility, facility

•Post MS-C

• FRP for TOC and MTOC•Added P-8A Subsystem•WIN2K eradication• Pre MS-C for Inc 3

TacMobileestablished as ACAT III

program separate

from

GCCS-M

• FRP

for

JMASTTR 2.1.1.1• Fielded

• WIN 10 migration

• HAASW, HAAWC,

MAC Ph 2

• P-8A Inc 2 ECPs 2 & 3

• TM support to Triton COP

•AAS OPEVAL

• Align with P-8A Inc 3 Blk 2

• High bandwidth dissemination of ACINT, GEOINT

and SIGINT

• SOA

•Higher than Secret

Inc 2• FRP for TOC

and MTOC• Added

Subsystems to meet

Operational Requirements

• Pre MS-Capproved for

Inc 2.1

• Win XP

eradication

• ASW upgrades

• ADNS

• P-8A Inc 2

•JMAST EOL

Inc 3

Inc 1

Inc 2.1TR 2.1.1

Before TacMobile Increment 1• 1970 First TSC (TOC) at NAS Keflavik• 1978 TSC (TOC) project transfers from NAVAIR to NAVELEX• 1986 OP-05 (N2/6) and OP-094 (N98) MOU for Joint Funding of ASWOC (TOC)• 1991 OP-05 (N2/6) and OP-094 (N98) MOU for Joint Funding of MOCC (MTOC)

Without TacMobile, P-8A cannot fly its mission


TacMobileInterdependencies

Internal:PMW 120 (METOC, DCGS-N DIB*, CLASSIC REACH*)PMW 130 (HBSS, PKI, Crypto, CDS*)PMW 150 (GCCS-M, ADSI, TADIL)PMW 160 (ADNS, WSUS, COMPOSE, CENTRIXS-M)PMW 170 (HF, UHF, SHF, GBS, NTCDL*)PMW 790 (RRK, NOC/Teleport)

External:DISA (HBSS Server, ACAS Server, UVDS*) PMA-290 (P-3C & P-8A aircraft software/interfaces, MINOTAUR*)PMA-262 (Triton UAS)PMA-264 (Air ASW Sensors, ASPECT)PMA-281 (P-8A Mission Planning Component, JMPS)PEO IWS5 (USW-DSS)AST Program Office (Advanced Airborne Sensor)AUS Co-OpUK/Nor/NZ*/South Korea*/Saudi Arabia* FMS *Potential/Future

TacMobile is an Integration Program of 24 Sub-Systems 19


We Rely on a Wide Variety of Skills from Industry

20

• Program Support: Program Managers, Lead Engineers, Lead Logisticians, System Administrators, System Security Engineers, Integrated Master Schedulers, Requirements Managers Information Assurance SMEs and Security Classification Guide Developers

• Software Developers for: SOA, C+, Java, TacMASS, MARS, Acoustic Signal ProcessingUnix/Linux/Windows

• Engineering and Logistics: Software Integrators, Testing and Evaluation Engineers, Logisticians Help Desk Support, Configuration Managers, Training Specialists,Shipping Specialists, Technical Writers Drafter/CAD Operators

• Production and SMEs: Production Managers, Electronics Technicians, P-3C/P-8A Interface SMEsHardware Engineers, Technical Analysts, Production Engineers ISEA support, Software Loading and Configuration SMEs Facilities Electricians, Architecture & Planning, CPD Developers


TacMobile Current Primary Contract

Contract Scope Type Prime $ Ceiling ExpirationEngineering Support Services: Technical services, equipment procurement, system integration, assembly, testing, studies and analysis, installation, training, maintenance and support, configuration management, quality assurance (QA), material control, program management, and logistics products and services in support of life cycle management responsibilities

CPFF/FFP Tapestry Solutions $76M 2020

21


• Two-plus years out, we are already preparing for the follow-on contract:

Procurement Planning Strategy Meeting

Acquisition Plan

Acquisition Strategy

PMW 750 Contracts

Contract Scope Type Prime $ Ceiling ExpProfessional Support Services: Program Management, Financial Planning, Contracting Support, Administrative Support, Production and Installation Management, Acquisition Support, and Technical Support Services for PMW 750

Seaport-e Sentek $53M 2022

Advanced Planning* : Production planning, conducting risk analyses, tracking/reporting program status, and managing actions and improving workflow related to processes to enable efficient surface ship, submarine, and shore platform production installation engineering and integration

Seaport-e Forward Slope $23M 2022

Financial Support*: Business Financial Competency Support Seaport-e BAH $45M 2021

SCN Integration (CTII): Design, integration, engineering, procurement, fabrication, incidental purchase of supplies and equipment, assembly, test, inspection, delivery, and limited installation of integrated C4I capabilities aboard new construction (including RCOH) ships. PMW 750 Platforms: CVN, LHA and PMW 760 Platforms: LPD, T-AGM 25, T-AKE, JHSV

CPFFFFP SRC $114M 2019

Note: * Numerous PEO C4I PMWs

22


Areas of Possible Industry Involvement Our Top Five

1. We anticipate more built-in dependencies across programsOne program can’t do it all so leverage capabilities already availableOLD THINK: Program-centric Solutions

2. Inter-Program Integration is getting more complexC4I baseline deliveries require increased collaboration from Design to DeliveryThis collaborative spirit includes everyone! Government, Fleet, and IndustryNEWER THINK: Program Partnership Solutions/Agreed-Upon Interface Specs

3. As Government improves its partnerships, we become affordableWe cannot afford to procure and sustain multiple, duplicative solutions …NEWER THINK: From ship-centric to Strike Group-centric

4. Cybersecurity is here to stay and is GrowingLooking beyond Program-centric, ship-centric, Strike Group-centric to…FUTURE THINK: ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS

5. Accelerate Capability Delivery to the Warfighter“A good plan, violently executed now, is better than a perfect plan next week.” – GEN George S. Patton“I wanna go fast!” – Ricky Bobby from Talladega Nights, The Ballad of Ricky Bobby

23


Visit us at www.peoc4i.navy.mil

We Deliver Information Warfare Capabilities to the

Fleet.

24

Documents

Program Executive Office Command, Control, … Executive Office Command, Control, Communications, ... PEO C4I Organizational Structure 3. ... Why We Find Issues - Examples • Installation