Under

the

2015

Efflu

ent

Lim

itG

uid

elin

es

(ELG

s)

Rule

en

acte

dby

the

U.S

.E

nviro

nm

enta

l

Pro

tectio

nA

gency

(EP

A),

exis

ting

pro

ducers

of

FG

Dw

aste

wate

rneed

tolim

itth

e

concentra

tions

of

merc

ury,

ars

enic

,sele

niu

mand

nitrite

/nitra

tein

their

dis

charg

ed

FG

D

stre

am

s(T

able

1).

Alth

ough

EP

Ah

as

postp

oned

the

orig

inal

com

plia

nce

date

of

Novem

ber

1,

2018,

they

will

pro

pose

anew

revis

ed

Rule

with

apro

jecte

dcom

plia

nce

date

of

Novem

ber

1,

2020

1.A

ssuch,

many

facilitie

sw

illstill

need

toaddre

ss

this

com

plia

nce

issue

by

imple

mentin

gan

econom

icand

effic

ient

treatm

ent

pro

cess

to

pre

pare

for

the

rele

ase

ofth

enew

ELG

sNE

ED

INT

RO

DU

CT

ION

Jinjia

n W

u1, Jo

on

Min

1,a, Yo

un

g C

hu

lC

ho

i 2 b, N

ishil

Mo

ha

mm

ed

2

1E

S E

ng

ine

erin

g S

ervice

s, LLC, a

sub

sidia

ry of M

on

trose

En

iron

me

nta

lG

rou

p, In

c. 2S

ou

the

rn R

ese

arch

aP

rincip

al In

vestig

ato

r, TE

L: 94

9-4

00

-34

58

, Em

ail: jm

in@

mo

ntro

se-e

nv.co

mb

co-P

rincip

al In

vestig

ato

r, Em

ail: ych

oi@

sou

the

rnre

sea

rch.o

rg

RE

FE

RE

NC

ES

1. h

ttps://w

ww

.ep

a.g

ov/e

g/ste

am

-ele

ctric-po

we

r-ge

ne

ratin

g-e

fflue

nt-g

uid

elin

es-2

01

5-fin

al-ru

le

2. h

ttps://w

ww

.fed

era

lreg

ister.g

ov/d

ocu

me

nts/2

01

5/1

1/0

3/2

01

5-2

56

63

/efflu

en

t-limita

tion

s-gu

ide

line

s-

an

d-sta

nd

ard

s-for-th

e-ste

am

-ele

ctric-po

we

r-ge

ne

ratin

g-p

oin

t-sou

rce

3. M

in, J.H

., Zh

an

g, J.Z

., Tasse

r, C., C

roze

s, G.F., H

erin

g, J.G

., “De

velo

pm

en

t an

d a

pp

licatio

n o

f low

-cost

bio

po

lyme

r-ba

sed

ad

sorp

tive m

ed

ia fo

r arse

nic, ch

rom

ium

, an

d se

len

ium

rem

ova

l.” Pa

pe

r at th

e K

SE

A

We

stern

Re

gio

na

l Tech

no

log

y Co

nfe

ren

ce “G

ree

n E

arth

an

d B

eyo

nd

”, Ca

ltech

, Pa

sad

en

a, C

A, Fe

b 9

, 20

08

.

2019 C

rossc

uttin

g A

nn

ua

l Re

vie

w M

ee

ting

Pittsb

urg

h A

pril 1

0th, 2

019, P

en

nsy

lva

nia

PR

OJE

CT

PR

OG

RE

SS

BE

NF

ITS A

ND

FU

TU

RE

WO

RK

Curre

nt

treatm

ent

meth

ods

for

sele

niu

min

FG

D

waste

wate

rin

clu

de

bio

logic

al

reductio

n,

adsorp

tion,

and

mem

bra

ne

pro

cesses.

Bio

logic

al

reductio

nconverts

Se

6and

Se

4to

Se

0.2

Alth

ough

effe

ctiv

e,it

has

limita

tions

inclu

din

g:

Long

rete

ntio

ntim

e,

whic

hre

quire

sla

rger

footp

rintand

hig

her

capita

lcosts

R

equire

sfre

quent

handlin

gof

bio

logic

al

slu

dge/b

ackw

ash

waste

H

igh

food

sourc

e(e

lectro

ndonor)

consum

ptio

n

toachie

ve

com

ple

tere

ductio

nto

Se

0

Next S

teps:

AP

PR

OA

CH

Co

nta

min

an

tsU

nit

Daily

Maxim

um

Mo

nth

ly A

vera

ge

Ars

enic

μg/L

11

8

Merc

ury

ng/L

788

365

Sele

niu

mμ

g/L

23

12

Tota

l Nitro

gen (N

O3 /N

O2 -N

)m

g/L

17

4.4

Table

1. P

roposed E

LG

limits

for F

GD

waste

wate

r dis

charg

e 2

Schedule

and P

rogre

ss:

Inth

ispro

ject,

anovel

hybrid

pro

cess

ispro

posed

tore

move

sele

niu

mand

oth

er

key

conta

min

ants

inF

GD

waste

wate

r.T

he

hybrid

pro

cess

com

bin

es

chem

ical

and

bio

logic

al

pro

cesses

toachie

ve

sele

niu

m

rem

oval.

The

pro

cess

has

advanta

ges

inclu

din

g:

R

eductio

non

overa

llre

actio

ntim

e

for

sele

niu

mre

moval;

sm

alle

r

footp

rint

Mem

bra

ne

pro

cesses

such

as

RO

isable

tore

ject

Se

6and

Se

4.H

ow

ever

limita

tions

exis

tsfo

rm

em

bra

ne

treatm

entofF

GD

waste

wate

rin

clu

din

g:

H

igh

foulin

g/s

calin

gpote

ntia

l

R

equire

sconcentra

tem

anagem

entand

dis

posal

H

igh

capita

land

O&

Mcost

C

aptu

ring

sele

niu

m,

ars

enic

insolid

media

phase,

rath

er

than

inbackw

ash

stre

am

,achie

vin

gbette

rw

aste

managem

ent

3

S

pent

media

volu

me

reductio

nby

dew

ate

ring

natu

rally

toachie

ve

volu

me

reductio

nfo

rdis

posalcostre

ductio

n3

M

eetin

gT

CLP

leachin

gte

stofth

espentm

edia

Tech

no

log

yE

ne

rgy

Re

qu

irem

en

ts W

ate

r Re

qu

irem

en

ts

Trea

tme

nt P

roce

ssB

ack

wa

sh / re

ject ra

teS

tartu

p w

ash

wa

ter

Bio

log

ical Tre

atm

en

t-

Influ

en

t pu

mp

ing

-C

he

mica

l fee

d

-5

~1

0%

-~

Da

ily b

ack

wa

sh to

rem

ove

sele

niu

m so

lids

-S

tart u

p rin

se w

ate

r to w

ash

ou

t fine

me

dia

du

e to

attritio

n fo

r carb

on

ba

sed

me

dia

Co

nv

en

tion

al M

ed

ia

Ad

sorp

tion

-In

flue

nt p

um

pin

g

-0

%-

Sta

rt up

rinse

wa

ter

Co

nv

en

tion

al Io

n

Exch

an

ge

(reg

en

era

ble

)

-In

flue

nt p

um

pin

g-

~ 5

%

-D

aily

reg

en

era

tion

with

brin

e a

nd

rinse

cycle

-S

tart u

p rin

se w

ate

r

Me

mb

ran

e (R

O)

-H

igh

pre

ssure

influ

en

t

pu

mp

ing

-In

ter-sta

ge

pu

mp

ing

-C

he

mica

l fee

d

-1

5~

20

%

-C

on

tinu

ou

s reje

ct strea

m

du

e to

RO

reco

ve

ry lim

it

-M

em

bra

ne

con

ditio

nin

g w

ate

r

-R

eg

ula

r me

mb

ran

e cle

an

ing

wa

ter

Hy

brid

Pro

cess

-In

flue

nt p

um

pin

g

-C

he

mica

l fee

d

~2

~3

%-

Sta

rt up

rinse

wa

ter

Futu

reW

ork

S

cale

-up

pro

ductio

nin

treatm

entsyste

m

In

tegra

tion

oftre

atm

entsyste

min

exis

ting

FG

Dm

anagem

ent

Pote

ntia

lB

enefits

:

Low

er

capita

land

O&

Mcosts

com

pare

dw

ithexis

ting

treatm

entpro

cesses

Low

er

energ

yconsum

ptio

n

Low

waste

wate

rgenera

tion

and

easie

rm

anagem

ent