Upload
daev-oh
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 Protest and Protest Movements
1/3
Protest and Protest Movements
by David O.
Political protest, whether with an aim toward raising social consciousness within the broad public orwith that of challenging authority in the hopes of pressuring power to concede to demand, sometimes
(though by no means always) occurs within the framework of a wider protest movement. Unlike
specific protest actions, the tactics employed in their manifestation and the strategies which underpinthe wider framework of these tactics, protest movements, as any other social movement are
considerably less centralized and arguably less able to be contained or controlled. It is primarily
through the autonomy of the constituent parts of any social movement that it takes hold in the heartsand minds of those who identify with the movement in question. There exists in any social movement
something of a cultural semantic dissonance on the part of the multivariate constituents of a given
social movement at a given time. While this dissonance is crucial to the mass appeal of a movement, it
may only facilitate the social movement toward and up until the point where break downs occur in theperceived efficacy, commitment and momentum of the movement in question.
Political protest is by its very definition, extra-systemic political activity which aims to address
a social grievance through presenting a challenge to culturally accepted forms of authority. Thischallenge may aim at raising social awareness to a particular social issue to the end of putting that issue
on the political agenda of the day, as James M. Jasper holds, or it may aim toward directly challenging
political authority in a disruptive manner to the end of pressuring political power to concede todemand, as suggests Francis Fox Piven. In either case, political protest seeks to challenge culturally
accepted norms as a matter of course. This is not so simple a task as it seems, the hegemonic strains of
social pressure which bind the fabric of social norms in place in any society are very strong. Certainly,the institutionalization of cultural habit handed down through a culture's history manifests itself in such
broad and pervasive social forums as politics, economics, the military, religion, education and familial
kinship ties. What's more, those institutional forces which acquire hegemonic force over and above all
other social forces actively seek to retain their hegemony through the activity of those individuals andgroups within society who actively benefit from it. Given such a social condition, the effectiveness of
political protest can only be marginal without being engaged in continuously and in a multitude of
ways through mass participation on the part of a wide and diverse segment of the public.This is the Central feature of a protest movement. A protest movement extends across a broad
spectrum of societal elements, each motivated for somewhat different reasons. The content or cohesion
of these reasons is not immediately pertinent to the efficacy of the movement but the perception ofefficacy certainly plays a key role in the maintenance of the movement. The movement to abolish
slavery in the United States, for instance, took on ethical dimensions shaped by religion, and general
ethical politics and saw its aims ultimately accomplished due to matters of military sensibility. The civil
rights movement of the 20th century took on many forms and many tactical and strategicmanifestations, from those put forth by Martin Luther King Jr. and southern black Christians to those of
Malcolm X and the Nation of Islam, from those of black and white northerners who mounted a
campaign to travel to the south and directly confront southern racism through the freedom rides to themany people who participated in the Race riots of the 1960s which lead directly to the drafting of the
1964 Civil Rights Bill. The Second wave of the Women's Liberation movement in the United states had
a similarly mass appeal to women pushing for changes in political, economic, educational and familialinstitutions through a myriad of tactical and strategic approaches. In each of these cases, the appeals of
the movement were at no point controlled or constrained by the ideals or ideologies of any segment of
the movement. Conversely, the efficacy of the general cause was felt across all ideations and ideologiesof the individuals and groups of which these movements were comprised.
A more general feature distinguishing political protests from the broader movements which
contextualize and inspire them lay in factors of commitment and momentum. For a movement, long
7/31/2019 Protest and Protest Movements
2/3
term commitment of a mass of participants is crucial. Even if participants come into and out of the
political fold over time, the ability for a political movement to continually revitalize itself over time is
the key to its ability to progress against the cultural norms which it seeks to challenge. In the context of
political protest, this becomes less immediately important. While numbers are key to the efficacy ofcertain political tactics, it takes considerably less personal and collective fortitude to stay committed to
an individual protest action as it is manifest in a single instance. A day of marching is nothing
compared to a lifetime of behavioral change. As a requirement for success, momentum lay almostcompletely in the realm of movement focused activism.
Ultimately, social change is a complex and often difficult game to play. Through effort over
time, the relative powerless within any society may attempt to do so by way of extra-systemic methods.These methods may take on any number of tactical and strategic approaches to reach their ends. These
tactics and strategies, however, are most effective when they are engaged in and developed
autonomously by many different groups of individuals from broadly diverse segments of society,
bearing broadly diverse ideas and beliefs, uniting under an identity held together by a broad andgeneral goal. That is the point of protest movements and their success (to what degree they are
successful) is often determined by this fact.
7/31/2019 Protest and Protest Movements
3/3
Works Cited:Jasper, James M. 1997.
The Art of Moral Protest: Culture, Biography, and Creativity in Social Movements. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
Piven, Frances Fox. 2006.
Challenging Authority: How Ordinary People Change America. Lanham, MD. Rowman & Littlefield.
Dugger, William M. 1980."Power: An Institutional Framework of Analysis". Journal of Economic Issues. 14 (4): 897-907.
Gramsci, Antonio. 1992.
Prison Notebooks. New York. Columbia UP.
Wicker, Tom. 1968.Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. New York. Bantam.