Upload
nora-gordon
View
221
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PSY 323: Cognition
Chapter 7: Long-Term Memory: Encoding, Retrieval, & Consolidation
Encoding
•Mental Rehearsal ▫Maintenance Rehearsal
Repeating things over and over Helps maintain information in STM/WM
▫Elaborate Rehearsal Involves thinking about how new material
relates to information already stored in memory
Effective at transferring information into LTM
3
Levels of Processing (LOP)
•Craik & Lockhart (1972); Nairne (2010)▫Quality of memory depends on how
information is encodedSee demo on next two slides
4
For about 5 seconds per item, count # of vowels in each word
•Chair•Mathematics•Elephant•Lamp•Car•Elevator•Thoughtful•Cactus
Count backward from 100 by 3’s; when you get to 76, write down as many words as you can remember. Do that now.
Replication of Craik & Lockhart (1972)
5
For about 5 seconds per item, visualize how useful the item would be on a deserted island
•Umbrella•Exercise•Forgiveness•Rock•Hamburger•Sunlight•Coffee•Bottle
Count backward from 99 by 3’s; when you get to 75, write down as many words as you can remember. Do that now.
Replication of Craik & Lockhart (1972); Nairne, Pandeirada, & Thompson 2007, 2008)
6
How did you do?
•Chair•Mathematics•Elephant•Lamp•Car•Elevator•Cactus•Thoughtful
• Umbrella• Exercise• Forgiveness• Rock• Hamburger• Sunlight• Bottle• Coffee
7
What Levels of Processing tells us…
Memory for words is better when they are linked to other knowledge•Depth of Processing seems to matter
Shallow Processing•Little attention to meaningDeep Processing•Close attention to meaning
8
Experimental Evidence for LOP
Craik & Tulving (1975)
9
Types of questions
Procedure•Shallow:
▫Is the word printed in capital letters?•Deeper:
▫Does the word rhyme with train?•Deepest:
▫Does the word fit into the sentence “He saw a ____ on the street?”
Craik & Tulving (1975)
10
Levels of Processing
Deep processing takes longer but results in better memory.
Shallow
Deeper
Deepest
Craik & Tulving (1975)
11
Aiding Encoding: Forming additional connections
Complex or descriptive sentences aid memory
•Chicken▫She cooked the chicken.▫The great bird swooped down and carried off
the struggling chicken.
•Which sentence would help you to remember the word “chicken?”
Forming Visual Images
Bower & Winzenz (1970)Procedure•Paired associate learning paradigm•15 noun pairs; 5 seconds to remember
▫ Group 1: Silently repeat▫ Group 2: Mental image
•After delay, participants are given first word and asked to remember the secondResults•Group 2 did better; recalled more than twice as many words
See next slide
Forming Visual Images
Interpretation•Illustrates the advantage of visual coding
Bower & Winzenz (1970)
Results
Linking Words to YourselfRogers et al. (1977)Experiment 1Procedure•Participants read a question for three seconds and then saw a word•They answered yes if the word was in the question and no if it wasn’t
Four types of questions:•Physical characteristics of word•Rhyming•Meaning•Self-reference
Linking Words to Yourself
Rogers et al. (1977)
Exp. 1: Results
16
Linking Words to Yourself
Experiment 2
Rogers et al. (1977)
Results
Why are we more likely to remember words they connect to ourselves?Rogers et al. (1977)Experiments 1 & 2
Interpretation•One possible explanation is that the words become linked to something the participants in these experiments know well—themselves
The Generation EffectSlameka & Graf (1978)Procedure•Paired associate learning paradigm•Participants studied related word pairs
▫ Group 1: Read group▫ Group 2: Generate group
•After delay, participants asked to recall second word in pair after being presented with first wordResults•Group 2 did significantly betterInterpretation•Generating material yourself, rather than passively receiving it, enhances learning and retention
How do we recall or retrieve information that is not presently in conscious awareness?•Retrieval Cues
▫Stimuli that help us to get information stored in LTM
▫Seems to help the best if it taps into information that was encoded at the time of learning
Retrieval PracticeTesting Effect
Roediger & Karpicke (2006)Procedure•Participants read prose passages for 7 minutes followed by a 2-minute break during which they solved math problems.
▫Group 1: Testing group▫Group 2: Rereading group
•After various delays, all participants were given recall test
Retrieval PracticeTesting Effect
Roediger & Karpicke (2006)
Results
Interpretation•Retrieval can get better with practice (after extended delays)
Cued Recall
High school students listened to lists of 12, 24, and 48 words
Procedure & Results of Tulving & Pearlstone (1966)
Matching Conditions of Encoding & RetrievalEncoding Specificity Principle
Godden & Baddeley (1975)
Procedure•Participants randomly assigned to 4 groups:
Listen/RecallGroup 1: water/landGroup 2: land/waterGroup 3: water/waterGroup 4: land/land
24
Matching Conditions of Encoding & Retrieval
Procedure & Results of Gooden & Baddeley (1975)
25
Matching Conditions of Encoding & Retrieval
Procedure & Results of Grant et al. (1998)
Matching Conditions of Encoding & RetrievalInterpretation of both studies:• The effect of context is significant• Recall is better if the retrieval context is
similar to the encoding context
Gooden & Baddeley (1975); Grant et al. (1998)
State Dependent Memory
Moods Cue•Memory is better when a person’s internal state during retrieval matches their internal state during encoding•Information learned in a particular emotional state (e.g., depressed, happy, somber) may be more easily recalled when in that same state of mind
28
State Dependent Memory
Procedure & Results of Eich & Metcalfe (1989)
State Dependent Memory
InterpretationThe effect of context is significant• Recall is better if the retrieval context is
similar to the encoding context
Transfer Appropriate Processing This phenomenon shows that memory performance is enhanced if the type of task at encoding matches the type of task at retrieval
Morris et al. (1977)Procedure•The encoding part of the experiment had two conditions:
▫The meaning condition ▫The rhyming condition
•Participants in both conditions heard a sentence with one word replaced by the word “blank”; 2 seconds later, they heard a target word
Transfer Appropriate Processing ProcedureMeaning Group•Answer “yes” or “no” based on the meaning of the sentence created by replacing “blank” with the target wordRhyme Group•Answer “yes” or “no” based on the rhyme created by replacing “blank” with the target word
Morris et al. (1977)
Transfer Appropriate Processing
Morris et al. (1977)
Results
Interpretation•This result would not be predicted by levels of- processing theory, but is predicted by the principle that better retrieval occurs if the encoding and retrieval tasks are matched
The Process of Consolidation…
Transforming new memories from fragile state (easily lost) to a permanent state (not easily lost)•Standard Model of Consolidation•Multiple Trace Hypothesis
Standard Model of ConsolidationThis model posits that the hippocampus important at first; not so much laterReactivation •A process in which the hippocampus replays the neural activity associated with memory•This activity results in the formation of connections between the cortical areas •This reactivation process occurs during sleep or during periods of relaxed wakefulness, and can also be enhanced by conscious rehearsing of a memory
Standard Model of ConsolidationReactivation •Eventually, the cortical connections become strong enough so that the different sites in the cortex become directly linked, and the hippocampus is no longer necessary •Thus, according to the standard model of consolidation, the hippocampus is strongly active when memories are first formed but become less active as memories are consolidated, until eventually only cortical activity is necessary to retrieve remote memories
Standard Model of ConsolidationEvidence for this model comes from occurrences of graded amnesia •Retrograde amnesia is most severe for events that occurred just before an injury
Retrograde amnesia•Loss of memory for events that have happened prior to trauma or disease
Standard Model of ConsolidationGradual decrease in amnesia for past events supports idea that connections between hippocampus and the cortical connections are formed and strengthened as time passes after an event and then vanish•Hippocampus is strongly active when memories are initially formed and recalled •Then becomes less involved as memories are consolidated •Eventually, the connections between the cortical areas themselves are enough to access remote memories
The Process of Consolidation…
Multiple Trace Hypothesis (MTH)•Hippocampus’ influence is important during latter stages of memory formation as wellGilboa et al. (2004)•Participants shown photographs of themselves engaging in various activities at times ranging from very recently to when they were 5 years old •The results of this experiment showed that the hippocampus was activated during retrieval of both recent and remote memories
Reconsolidation
•This theory posits that when a memory is retrieved, it returns to the STM state
•If undisturbed it will undergo consolidation again back into LTM
•However, it may not go undisturbed and is susceptible to alteration at this time
•Since reactivated memory is in a labile state, it can be blocked (just as in consolidation)
Credits
Some of the slides in this presentation prepared with the assistance of the following web sites: www.radford.edu/dhall/Matlin%20powerpoint
s/ch05%20edited.ppt archlab.gmu.edu/people/jthompsz/6-LongTermMemory_2.ppt