285
Radiographic techniques R.Hemalatha 1 st year Dept. Of Pedodontcs and Preventive Dentistry

Radiograph sem

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Radiograph sem

Radiographic techniques Radiographic techniques

R.Hemalatha1st year

Dept. Of Pedodontcs and Preventive Dentistry

Page 2: Radiograph sem

Contents…Contents…1. Introduction2. Parts of X-ray tube3. Projection Geometry• Principles of projection geometry• Terms• Focal spot• Magnification• Distortion• Heel effect3. Intra oral radiographs• Periapical radiography

1. Paralleling technique2. Bisecting angle technique

• Bite wing radiography• Occlusal radiography

Page 3: Radiograph sem

• Placement of the film in children and its management

• Full mouth radiography• Object localisation technique• Radiographic faults4. Extraoral techniques• Lateral cephalometric projections• Submentovertex projections • Waters• Posteroanterior cephalometric• Reverse-towne projections5. Digital radiography and advanced

imaging techiques6.Effects of dental radiographs in oral cavity7.Radiation protection8. Conclusion 9.Refrences

Contents…

Page 4: Radiograph sem

IntroductionIntroduction

• Radiograph is a 2D image of a 3D object.• A good radiograph is required for use as a

good diagnostic aid.• Principles of projection geometry teach us

how to reach perfection during radiography.

• The intraoral radiograph, when correlated with the case history and clinical examination, is one of the most important diagnostic aids to the dental practitioner. 

Page 5: Radiograph sem

Parts of X-Ray Parts of X-Ray

An X-ray tube is a vacuum tube that produces X-rays. They are used in X ray machines. X-rays are part of the electromagnetic spectrum, an ionizing radiation with wavelengths shorter than ultraviolet light.

Page 6: Radiograph sem

• As with any vacuum tube, there is a cathode, which emits electrons into the vacuum and an anode to collect the electrons, thus establishing a flow of electrical current, known as the beam, through the tube.

• A high voltage power source is connected across cathode and anode to accelerate the electrons.

• The X-Ray spectrum depends on the anode material and the accelerating voltage.

• Electrons from the cathode collide with the anode material, usually tungsten, molybdenum or copper, and accelerate other electrons, ions and nuclei within the anode material.

• About 1% of the energy generated is emitted/radiated, perpendicular, rest of the energy is released as heat.

Page 7: Radiograph sem

• tungsten will be deposited from the target onto the interior surface of the tube, including the glass surface.

• The arc will jump from the cathode to the tungsten deposit, and then to the anode. This arcing causes an effect called "crazing" on the interior glass of the X-ray window, tube becomes unstable even at lower voltages, and must be replaced.

• The X-ray photon-generating effect is generally called the Bremsstrahlung effect.

• emitted X-ray photons, or dose, are adjusted by controlling the current flow and exposure time (high voltage controls X-ray penetration, and thus the contrast of the image and tube current and exposure time affect the dose and darkness of the image.

• Aluminum filters are installed in the path of the X-ray beam to remove "soft" (non-penetrating) radiation.

Page 8: Radiograph sem

• Fundamentals of radiography are-

Central beam should pass through the area to be examined.

The x-ray film should be placed in position so as to record the image with the least amount of image distortion

Page 9: Radiograph sem

Principles of Projection Geometry…

Principles of Projection Geometry…

Object and Film should be in contact or as close together as possible.

Object and film should be parallel to one another.

X-ray tube head should be positioned that, beam meets both the object and film at right angles.

Page 10: Radiograph sem

“Terms and conditions apply”

“Terms and conditions apply”

• Image sharpness-The ability of a radiograph to reveal the boundary between two areas of different radiodensity; or to define an edge precisely.

• Image spatial resolution-Ability of a radiograph to reveal small objects that are close together.Line pairs per mm.

OPG- 5line pairs/mm.IOPAR- 20line pairs/mm.

Page 11: Radiograph sem
Page 12: Radiograph sem

• Image size distortion-It is the increase in size of the image on the radiograph compared with the actual size of the object.

Page 13: Radiograph sem

• Image shape distortion-It is the unequal magnification of different parts of the same object on a single radiograph.

Page 14: Radiograph sem

For a good radiograph…For a good radiograph…

Page 15: Radiograph sem

Focal spotFocal spot

• Actual focal spot size= 1x3mm.• Effective focal spot size= 1x1mm.

• Size of the EFS- Angulation of the anode target to the long axis of the incident electron beam from the cathode.

• Ideal angle= 10-20o

• Smaller effective focal spot size, increased image sharpness and resolution.

Page 16: Radiograph sem

• Dec. heat production

• Inc. X-ray tube life

• Dec. sharpness and resolution

• Dec. clarity• Inc.

“geometric unsharpness”

• Inc. heat production

• Dec. X-ray tube life

• Inc. sharpness and resolution

• Inc. clarity

Page 17: Radiograph sem

Umbra and PenumbraUmbra and Penumbra

Fuzzy edge- Geometric Unsharpness

To have sharp edge of image:• Longer

“a”• Reduced

“b”• Smaller

EFS

BLURRING

Page 18: Radiograph sem
Page 19: Radiograph sem

MagnificationMagnification

• Formula= Size of the image = Focal spot to film distance Size of the object Focal spot to object distance

• When an image is magnified, the shape is maintained because every dimension of the object is magnified to the same extent, provided the object is placed parallel to the film.

Page 20: Radiograph sem

Use large FS to object distance

Use small object to film distance

Page 21: Radiograph sem

DistortionDistortion• Results from unequal

magnification of different parts of the same object.

• When not all the parts of the object are at the same FS to object distance.

Position the film parallel to the object.

Orient the central ray perpendicular to the film and the object.

Page 22: Radiograph sem

ForeshorteningRay perpendicular to the film but not the object

ElongationRay perpendicular to the object but not the film

Page 23: Radiograph sem

Heel effectHeel effect• Intensity of x-rays are not uniform over the area irradiated.• Due to the electrons having to travel more through the anode, less energy and intensity beam is seen towards the anode than towards the cathode , photons get absorbed by the target anode it self..

Biobrain article

Page 24: Radiograph sem

Increases with increas

e in anode angle steepn

ess

Increases with increase in

roughness of the anode

Decreases with increase in focal

spot to film distance

Decreases with

decrease in film sizeHeel Effect

Page 25: Radiograph sem

INTRA ORAL

RADIOGRAPHS

Periapical radiograp

hs

Bite wing radiograp

hs

Occlusal radiograp

hs

Page 26: Radiograph sem

Intra Oral Periapical Radiography…

Intra Oral Periapical Radiography…

• Includes the teeth and the tissues around the apices.

• Uses- • Detection of apical infection/

inflammation.• Assessment of periodontal status• Assessment of an unerupted tooth• Assessment of root morphology• Evaluate position and prognosis of

implants

Page 27: Radiograph sem

• Ideal positioning requirements-• Tooth and film should be as close to each

other as possible.• Tooth and film should be parallel to each

other.• The film is positioned with its long axis

vertical for anterior teeth and horizontal for posterior teeth.

• Beam must be directed at 90o to both the teeth and the film.

• Positioning must be reproducible.

Page 28: Radiograph sem

Placement of the film…Placement of the film…

• The white side of the film always faces the teeth.

• Anterior films are always placed vertically.

• Posterior films are always placed horizontally.

• The identification dot on the film is always made to face the operator and on the occlusal end of the radiograph.

• The film is always centred over the areas to be examined.

• Ideally 2mm of the alveolar bone must be seen periapically.

Page 29: Radiograph sem

Landmarks used…Landmarks used…

Inner canthusPupil

Outer canthus

Occlusal Plane

Page 30: Radiograph sem

Paralleling TechniqueParalleling Technique• C. Edmund Kells in 1896 • developed by Gordon M.

Fitzgerald in 1947.• Used by Franklin W.

McCormack in practical dental radiography.

• It was so named because the object (tooth), receptor (film packet), and end of the position indicating device (PID) are all kept on parallel planes.

Page 31: Radiograph sem

• Long axis of the tooth is parallel to long axis of the film• Central ray at 90o to both.• Film holder and x-ray tube head positions can be reproduced.• Film placed at same distance away from the tooth.• Long open ended aiming cylinder

Long con techRight Angled tech

PRINCIPLEThe image sharpness is primarily affected by the distance from the focal spot within the tube head and the film, object-film distance, motion, and the effective focal spot size of the x-ray tube.

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2011) 40, 385-389The British Institute of Rdiology

Page 32: Radiograph sem
Page 33: Radiograph sem

• Projection method-• Maxillary projections, superior border

of the film placed at the height of the palatal vault.

• Mandibular projections, inferior border of the film placed on the floor of the mouth.

• Vertical angulation- 90o

• Horizontal angulation- 0o

Now more commonly used method

Page 34: Radiograph sem

• Film holders- • Rinn XCP, Rinn stabe film holders,

Precision film holders, EEZEE grip film holders.

• Most preferred is Rinn XCP film holder• Parts- Plastic ring and plastic bite block,

metal indicator arms, addable ring collimators.

Page 35: Radiograph sem

DIS

AD

VA

NTA

GES

AD

VA

NTA

GES-Accuracy,

minimal distortion-Simplicity-Duplication is possible due to standardisation-Periodontal bone levels are well depicted.-Angulations and positions are reproducible.-The technique reduces the risk of cone cuts.

-Film placement in children or small mouths or shallow palate is difficult.-Discomfort-Apices of the teeth may appear close to the edge of the film.-Film holder needs autoclaving.

Page 36: Radiograph sem

• Developed by Weston Price in 1904.

Bisecting Angle Technique

PRINCIPLE- When the rule of isometry is used, the length of the tooth is equal to the length of the image on the radiograph.

Page 37: Radiograph sem

Ciezynski’s rule of isometry

Multirooted teeth- Angled differently for each root

Page 38: Radiograph sem

• Projection method-• For maxillary projections- Patient’s head

must be upright, with the sagittal plane vertical and the occlusal plane horizontal.

• For mandibular projections- Head is tilted back slightly.

Page 39: Radiograph sem

+400 +450

+300

+200

Page 40: Radiograph sem

-150 -200

-100

-50

Page 41: Radiograph sem

• Size of Intraoral films• Size 0 (22x35mm) used for bitewing and

periapical radiographs of small children• Size 1 (24x40mm) used for radiographing anterior

teeth in adults.• Size 2 (31x41mm) used for anterior occlusal

radiograph,periapical radiograph and bitewing survey in mixed and permanent dentition.

• Occlusal films have a size of 57x76 mm and are taken for viewing entire maxillary and mandibular arches

Page 42: Radiograph sem

DIS

AD

VA

NTA

GES

AD

VA

NTA

GES- Can be used

without a film holder.- Decreased exposure time.- Positioning of the film is relatively more comfortable to the patient in all areas of the mouth.

- Image distortion.- Angulation problems.- Unnecessary

exposure.- Shadow of

the zygomatic bone is frequently seen over the apex of the maxillary molars.

- Difficulty in angulation.

- Not reproducible.

Page 43: Radiograph sem

Comparison of Parelleling technique and bisecting angle

technique

Comparison of Parelleling technique and bisecting angle

technique

Page 44: Radiograph sem

Bite wing radiographs…Bite wing radiographs…• Also called as the INTERPROXIMAL

TECHNIQUE.• Developed by Howard Riley Raper in 1925.• Shows crowns of maxillary and mandibular

teeth, interproximal areas, and areas of crestal bone on the same radiograph.

• Name originated as the patient bites on the wing to stabilize the film.

Page 45: Radiograph sem

• Uses-• Checking the

interproximal areas of teeth

• Checking the alveolar bone on the radiograph.

• Caries in deciduous and transitional dentiton phase

AAAPD guideline for prescribing dental radiographs,2012

Page 46: Radiograph sem

• Vertical angulation- recommended angulation of +10o. Used to

compensate for slight bend of the upper portion of the film and tilt

of maxillary teeth.• Horizontal angulation- central ray

is directed perpendicular to the curvature of the arch and through the contact areas.

• Vertical bite wings are used to visualise the level of the alveolar bone, normally used as post treatment films after periodontal treatment.

Page 47: Radiograph sem

Occlusal radiograph…Occlusal radiograph…

• Occlusal radiography is defined as those intraoral radiographic techniques taken using a dental X-ray set where the film packet (5.7 x 7.6 cm) or a small intraoral cassette is placed in the occlusal plane.

USESI. To precisely locate roots, supernumerary,

unerupted & impacted teeth.II. To localize foreign bodies in the jaw & stones in the

duct of sublingual & submandibular gland duct.

III. Another use-- To demonstrate & evaluate the integrity of anterior, medial & lateral outlines of maxillary sinus.

IV. To obtain information about location, nature, extent & displacement of fractures of mandible & maxilla.

v Patients with reduced mouth openingvi. Cleft palate cases

Page 48: Radiograph sem

i. Topographic projectionsShows anterior part of maxilla or mandible and the anterior teeth.The cone is placed between the eye brows on the bridge of the nose.

Maxillary and Mandibular Occlusal Projections

Page 49: Radiograph sem

i. Topographic projectionsShows anterior part of maxilla or mandible and the anterior teeth.

Mandibular Occlusal Projections

Page 50: Radiograph sem

• ii. Vertex projectionShows the entire teeth present in the arch.

Page 51: Radiograph sem

ii. Vertex Mandibular projection ( cross sectional projection)

ii. Vertex Mandibular projection ( cross sectional projection)

Page 52: Radiograph sem

iii. Posterior Lateral projectionShows the posterior part of the maxilla and the upper posterior teeth on one side.

iv. Pediatric projectionShows the anterior part of the maxilla, used in children of 5years age or younger.

Page 53: Radiograph sem

• iii. Posterior Oblique Mandibular Occlusal projection

Page 54: Radiograph sem

• Positioning the Radiograph• Positioning the radiograph vertically in the mouth for

both periapical and bitewing radiographs reduces the distal extension of the radiograph and may result in greater tolerance by patients, especially those with a mild gag reflex.

• The vertical bitewing radiograph provides greater detail of the periapical area.

Page 55: Radiograph sem

Primary dentition (3 to 6 years)Primary dentition (3 to 6 years)

Maxillary anterior occlusal projection• Place no. 2 film with its long axis perpendicular to the

sagittal plane and the pebbled surface towards maxillary teeth.

• Direct the central ray at a vertical angulation of +60 degrees through the tip of the nose towards the center of the film

Mandibular anterior occlusal projection • Seat the child with the head tipped back so that the

occlusal plane is about 25 degrees above the plane of the floor.

• Place a no. 2 film with the long axis perpendicular to the sagital plane and the pebbled surface towards the mandibular teeth.

• Orient the central ray at -30 degrees vertical angulation and through the tip of the chin towards the film.

Page 56: Radiograph sem

Bitewing projection• Use no. 0 film with paper loop holder.• Place the film in the child’s mouth as in the adult

premolar bitewing projection.• The image field should include the distal half

ofthe canine and the deciduous molars.• Positive vertical angulation of +5 to +10 degrees.

Decidious maxillary molar periapical projection• Use no. 0 film , Position the film in the midline of

the palate with anterior border extending to the maxillary primary canine.

• The image field should include the distal half of the primary canine and both primary molars

Page 57: Radiograph sem

• Deciduous mandibular molar projectionProjection a no. 0 filmThe exposed radiograph should show the distal half of the mandibular primary canine and the primary molar teeth.

• Mixed dentition(7 to 12 years) Maxillary anterior periapical projection Center a no.1 film on the embrasure between the

central incisors in the mouth behind the maxillary central

and lateral incisors.Center the film on the midline.

Page 58: Radiograph sem

• Mandibular anterior periapcal projectionPosition no.1 film behind the mandibular central and lateral incisors

• Canine periapical projection Position no. 1 film behind each of the canines. Decidious and permanent molar periapical projection Position no.1 or no. 2 film with anterior edge behind the canine

• Posterior bitewing projection Use no.1 or no. 2 films as previously describedExpose four bitewings projections when the second permanent molars have erupted

Page 59: Radiograph sem

• Probable Technical Errors1. Improper placements of films.2. Cone cutting3. Incorrect horizontal angulations4. Incorrect vertical angulations5. Over exposure due to defective devices.6. A high exposure of the patient to radiation

because of repetition of taking X-rays due to an uncooperative child.

Page 60: Radiograph sem

Radiation hygiene measures

Radiation hygiene measures

• Proper registration and maintenance of radiographic units.

• Training of personnel who are associated with radiography

• Dosage monitoring• Radiation protection of the child patients by using lead

apron with thyroid collar.• Use of long lead-lined cylinder and cone positioning

devices• Use of electronically controlled exposure timer• Use of high speed films• Use of automatic processing machines that give good

consistent result• Employing proper technique to avoid the chances of

repeating exposure

Page 61: Radiograph sem

• The Snap-A-Ray is also useful for those patients that have a fear of swallowing the radiograph.

• By biting on the large positioning device and watching in a mirror they are assured they will not swallow the radiograph

A self sticking sponge tab may also reduce impingement ofthe radiograph on the intraoral soft tissue.For patients frightened of the procedure itself,desensitization techniques may be necessary to gain the patient cooperation

Page 62: Radiograph sem

Desensitization Techniques

Desensitization Techniques

• Desensitization is defined as gradually exposing the child to new stimuli or experiences of increasing intensity.

• An example of this is introducing the patient to x-rays by initially taking an anterior radiograph which is easier to tolerate than a posterior radiograph.

“Lollipop Radiograph Technique.”The child is given a lollipop to lick (preferably sugarless).

• After a few licks, the lollipop is taken from the child and a radiograph is attached to the lollipop using an orthodontic rubber band.

• The lollipop with the attached film is returnedto the child, who is told to lick the lollipop again.

• After a few licks, the child is told to hold the lollipop in his mouth while we take a tooth picture.The exposure is made

Page 63: Radiograph sem

Procuring Posterior RadiographsProcuring Posterior Radiographs

• Procuring posterior radiographs can be made more pleasant by associating it with a pleasurable taste….bubble gum.

• Before placing the radiograph in the patient’s mouth apply bubble gum flavored toothpaste to the film.

• The child will be more accepting of the radiograph

Page 64: Radiograph sem

Gag reflex Gag reflex • Some patients, young and old, have an

exaggerated gag reflex.• The etiology of an exaggerated gag reflex had

been attributed to psychological and physical factors.

• The easiest is through diversion and positive suggestion.

• The operator suggests to the patient the gag reflex can be reduced by concentrating on something other than the procedure.

• The patient’s palate can be sprayed with a topical anesthetic to reduce the sensation of the radiograph on the palate and tongue.

• An alternative is the use of nitrous oxide analgesia

Page 65: Radiograph sem

• Another alternative is to place the radiograph in such a manner to not come in contact with the palate or tongue.

• This is accomplished by either extraoral placement of the film or placing the film between the cheek and the tooth and exposing the film from the opposite jaw.

• The film side of the packet (the solid color side) is facing the buccal surface of the tooth

• The x-ray head is placed at the opposing side, and the coneis positioned under the angle of the ramus on the opposite side.

• As the x-ray beam is traveling a longer distance to the film than in the typical positioning, it is necessary to double the exposure time.

• It is imperative that after mounting radiographs are Reversed.

• Incorrect mounting and labeling of the reverse radiograph can result in misdiagnosis and treatment of the wrong tooth

Newman and Friedman Extraoral Radiographic Technique

Newman M, Friedman, S. Extraoral Radiographic Technique: An Alternative Approach. Journal Of Endodontics 2003;29:419-421

Page 66: Radiograph sem
Page 67: Radiograph sem

• Eshagali Saberi, Ladan Hafezi, Narges Farhadmolashahi, Manoochehr Mokhtari

Modified Newman and Friedman Extraoral Radiographic Technique

The patient sitting upright and the Frankfort plane being

horizontal to the floor and when the head was tilted 10 degrees

toward the side being examined.

For the upper posterior teeth the center of the image

receptor was placed on the intersection of the ala-tragus

and a parasagittal line while the upper border of receptor was parallel to the canthomeatal

line.

The cone was positioned a negative 25 degrees from the

horizontal plane.

Page 68: Radiograph sem

Modified Newman and Friedman Extraoral Radiographic Technique

The central beam was directed from midway between

maxillary and mandibular

premolars and molars of the

opposite side..

For the lower posterior teeth, the receptor was placed against the cheek

on the side of interest and its

lower border was parallel and 2 cm above the inferior

border of the mandible

The cone was angled -20 degrees from the horizontal

plane while the central beam was directed towards the mandibular molar-premolar

region.

Saberi1, Hafezi L, Farhadmolashahi1 N, Mokhtari M. Modified Newman And Friedman Extraoral Radiographic Technique

Page 69: Radiograph sem
Page 70: Radiograph sem

Type of encounter Child with primary dentition (prior erruption of 1st molar)

Child withTransitional Dentition(after eruption of firstpermanent tooth)

Adolescent withPermanent Dentition(prior to eruption ofthird molars)

New patient* being evaluated for dental diseases and dental development

Individualizedradiographic examconsisting of selectedperiapical/occlusalviews and/or posteriorbitewings if proximalsurfaces cannot bevisualized or probed.Patients withoutevidence of disease andwith open proximalcontacts may notrequire a radiographicexam at this time.

Individualizedradiographic examconsisting of posteriorbitewings withpanoramic exam orposterior bitewings andselected periapicalimages.

Individualized radiographic exam consisting of

posterior bitewings with panoramic exam orposterior bitewings and selected periapical images. A full mouth intraoral radiographic exam ispreferred when the patient has clinical evidence of generalized dental disease or a history of extensive dental treatment.

Recall patient* with clinical caries or at increased risk for caries**

Posterior bitewing exam at 6-12 month intervals if proximal surfaces cannot be examined visually or with a probe..

Recall patient* with no clinical caries and not at increased risk for caries

Posterior bitewing exam at 12-24 month intervalsif proximal surfaces cannot be examined visuallyor with a probe

Posterior bitewingexam at 18-36 monthintervals.

Recall patient* with periodontal disease

Clinical judgment as to the need for and type of radiographic images for the evaluation of periodontal disease. Imaging may consist of, but is not limited to, selected bitewing and/or periapical images of areas where periodontal disease (other than nonspecific gingivitis) can be identified clinically.

Page 71: Radiograph sem

Type of Encounter Child with PrimaryDentition (prior to eruption of first permanent tooth)

Child withTransitional Dentition(after eruption of firstpermanent tooth

Adolescent withPermanent Dentition(prior to eruption ofthird molar

Patient for monitoring of growth and development

Clinical judgment as to need for and type ofradiographic images for evaluation and/ormonitoring of dentofacial growth and development.

Clinical judgment as toneed for and type ofradiographic images for evaluation and/ormonitoring ofdentofacial growth and development.Panoramic or periapicalexam to assessdeveloping third molars

Patient with other circumstances including, but not limited to, proposed or existing implants, pathology, restorative/endodontic needs, treated periodontal disease and caries

Clinical judgment as to need for and type of radiographic images for evaluation and/or monitoring in these circumstances

Page 72: Radiograph sem

• Large or deep restorations• Malposed or clinically

impacted teeth• Mobilty of teeth• Sinus tract/ fistula• Clinically suspected sinus

pathology• Oral involvement in known

or suspected systemic disease

• Unxplained bleeding, sensistivity of tooth,

• Unusual erruption,spacing or migration of teeth, tooth morphology, calcification or colour, absence of teeth

• Clinical erosion• High level fo caries

experience• h/o of reccurent caries• High titre of cariogenic

titre• Exsisting restoration of

poor quality

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY-2012

• Poor oral hygiene• Inadequate fluoride exposureft in

diet• Poor family dental health• developmentrequentl high sucrose

content• Prolonged nursing bottle or breast

feeding• developmental or acquired enamel

defects• Developmental or acquired

disability• Xerostomia• Genetic abnormality of teeth• Many multisurface restorations• Chemo/radiation therapy• Eating disorders• Drug/alcohol abuse• Irregular dental care

Indications for pediatric radiographs

Page 73: Radiograph sem

Radiographic SurveysRadiographic Surveys

• The three most common series of radiographs taken in the dental office are

• Bitewing Surveys- consist of a premolar view and a molar view for each side of the mouth taken in occlusion (2 or 4 films) taken to examine the contact areas of the premolar and molar regions, and periapicals for the other teeth and edentulous areas.

• Full Mouth Surveys - series of x-rays that properly represent every tooth in the patient's mouth (with 3 to 4 millimeters of surrounding bone) and all other tooth bearing areas of the mouth even if edentulous

• panoramic film.

Page 74: Radiograph sem

Full Mouth RadiographsFull Mouth Radiographs

Permanent Dentition

22 total=18 IOPA + 4 Bite wings

Page 75: Radiograph sem

Mixed Dentition12= 10 IOPA+2 bite wings

Page 76: Radiograph sem

Deciduous Dentition

8 film= 6 IOPA + 2 Bitewings

Page 77: Radiograph sem

Object localisation techniques…

Object localisation techniques…

• To determine the location of a foreign object or an impacted tooth in the jaw.

• Two methods are used for localizing the object;

• Perpendicular technique-• Used to localize an object in or about the maxilla

or mandible in three dimensions.• In clinical practice the position of an object on

each radiograph is noted relative to anatomic landmarks.

• The right angle or cross section technique is best in mandible

• An IOPAR and an occlusal radiograph are used.

Page 78: Radiograph sem

B. Tube shift technique (SLOB Method)This method is also known as “buccal object rule”

or “Clark’s rule”(1910)Rationale for this technique derives from the

manner in which the relative positions of radiographic images of two separate objects change when projection angle at which the images are made is change.

Two radiographs are taken with different horizontal angulations.

Page 79: Radiograph sem

Radiographic Faults…Radiographic Faults…

Page 80: Radiograph sem

Quality Assessment…Quality Assessment…• Depends on-• X-Ray equipment• Focusing• Image processing• Patient• Operator and radiographic technique.

• If radiograph quality is poor, diagnostic information is lost.

Page 81: Radiograph sem

i. Light radiographsi. Light radiographsUnderexposure-• Insufficient

milliamperage• Insufficient peak

kilovoltage• Insufficient exposure

time• FS- Film distance to

much• Film packet reversed

Processing errors-• Underdevelopment

(Low temp, short time)

• Depleted developer solution

• Diluted or contaminated developer

• Excessive fixation

Page 82: Radiograph sem

ii. Dark radiographsii. Dark radiographsOverexposure-• Excessive

milliamperage• Excessive peak

kilovoltage• Excessive exposure

time• FS- Film distance to

short

Processing errors-• Overdevelopment

(high temp, long time)

• Developer concentration high

• Inadequate fixation• Improper safe

lighting• Accidental exposure

to light

Page 83: Radiograph sem

iii. Insufficient contrastiii. Insufficient contrast

• Underdevelopment

• Underexposure• Excessive peak

kilovoltage• Excessive film

fogiv. Film Fog• Improper safe

lighting• Light leaks• Over development• Contaminated

solutions• Deteriorated films

Page 84: Radiograph sem

Light fog

Radiation fog

Chemical fog

Deterioration of the film

• Light leaks• Turning on the

overhead white light too soon

• Improper storage

• Insufficient protection• Developer

temperature too high

• Overdevelopment

• Temperature of storage area too high

• Too high humidity

Page 85: Radiograph sem

v. Dark spots or linev. Dark spots or line

• Finger print contamination

• Black wrapping paper sticking to the film

• Film in contact with tank or another film during fixing

• Film contaminated with developer before developing

• Excessive bending• Static charge to film

before processing• Excessive roller

pressure or dirty rollers

Page 86: Radiograph sem

vii. Light spotsvii. Light spots

• Film contaminated with fixer before processing

• Film in contact with tank or another film during development

• Excessive bending of the film

Page 87: Radiograph sem

viii. Yellow or Brown stainsviii. Yellow or Brown stains

• Depleted developer

• Depleted fixer

• Insufficient washing

• Contaminated solutions

Page 88: Radiograph sem

ix. Herring bone or tire track appearence

ix. Herring bone or tire track appearence

• Placement of the film backwards, with the lead foil facing the x-ray tube.

Page 89: Radiograph sem

x. Blurringx. Blurring

Head restShort exposure time

Motion blurring

Slow speed filmsFiner grain sizeClose contact between film and screen

Image receptor blurring

Wet film viewing avoidedIntensifying screens

Geometric blurring

Parallax

Double exposure

Page 90: Radiograph sem

xi. Partial imagesxi. Partial images

• Top of the film not immersed in the developing solution

• Misalignment of the x-ray tube head (Cone cut).

Page 91: Radiograph sem

x. Emulsion peelx. Emulsion peel

Incorrect positioning of the x-ray tube head

Incorrect placement of the film packet

Foreshortening Reverse placement

Elongation Double exposure

Overlapping

Cone cut

• Abrasion of the film during processing.

• Excessive time in wash water.

• Improper handling of the film.

xi. Typical positioning faults

Page 92: Radiograph sem

Overlapping crown regions due to faulty horizontal angulation of the tube head.

Double exposure of the same film.

Page 93: Radiograph sem

EXTRA ORAL TECHNIQUESEXTRA ORAL TECHNIQUES

Page 94: Radiograph sem

• Extraoral radiograph are examination made of

the head and facial region using films located

outside the mouth.

• They are taken when large areas of the skull or

jaw must be examined or when patients are

unable to open their mouths for film placement

and areas not fully covered by IOPA.• Images are not as defined or sharp as intraoral

films.

Page 95: Radiograph sem

Extraoral radiographs can be used alone or in conjunction with intra oral radiographs.

Except for the panoramic radiographs, extraoral radiographs are not frequently used by General

practitioners.

Major users are orthodontistic, prosthodontic and oral surgeries

Page 96: Radiograph sem

Purpose and use of extraoral radiographs

Purpose and use of extraoral radiographs

Examine large areas of the jaws

and Skull.

Cervical spine for diseases

Detect fractures and evaluate

trauma

Study growth and development of bone and teeth

Detect pathological lesions and

Diseases of the jaws.

Detect and evaluate

impacted teeth.

Evaluate TMJ Disorders.

Page 97: Radiograph sem

Many film positions and techniques require …..special equipment's and …a sound knowledge of the anatomical

structures through which the radiation beam is directed.

…produced with conventional dental x-ray machines, certain models

of panoramic machines or higher capacity medical x-ray units.

TECHNIQUE

Cassette, Films, Intensifying Screens . grids

Page 98: Radiograph sem

Image receptor

• Cephalometric and skull views - 20x25cm (8x10 inch) image receptor.

• Lateral oblique projections of the mandible - 13x18cm (5x7 inch) image receptor.

• Panoramic views - 12.7x30.5cm (5x12 inch) or 15x30cm (6x12 inch)image receptor.

Page 99: Radiograph sem

It is critical to correctly and clearly label the right and left sides of the image.

It is done by placing a metal marker of R or L on the outside

of the cassette in a corner in which the marker does not obstruct diagnostic information.

The proper exposure parameters depend on the patient’s size, anatomy and head orientation,image receptor speeds,x-ray source to receptor distance and the use of grids.

3 to 4 sec

65 Kvp

10 mA

Page 100: Radiograph sem

The main anatomical landmark used in

patient positioning is the

CANTHOMEATAL LINE.

The canthomeatal line forms approximately a 10-degree angle with

the FRANKFORT PLANE.

REFERENCE PLANES

Page 101: Radiograph sem

Lateral cephalometric projection of the

sagittal or median plane.

Submentovertex projection of the

transverse or horizontal plane.

Water’s of the coronal or frontal plane.

Posteroanterior cephalometric

projection of the coronal or frontal

plane.

Reverse-Towne projection of the coronal or frontal

plane.

Lateral oblique projection of the

mandibular body and ramus.

Temperomandibular joint projections

Newman and Friedman Technique

Orthopantomography

VARIOUS EXTRA ORAL RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES ARE:

Page 102: Radiograph sem

Frontal (Posteroanterior)

Lateral skull projections.

Cephalometric means measurements of the head.

Either conventional x-ray machines modified for Cephalometric work or special units are needed

Cephalometric Radiographs

Page 103: Radiograph sem

It shows the entire

skull from the side

INDICATIONS

LATERAL SKULL PROJECTION

(LATERAL CEPHALOMETRIC PROJECTION)

•Measure and compare changes in Growth and development of

bone and the teeth through pre & progress and post treatment

records.

Facial soft tissue profile of the face

1. The contour of the lips and the face.

2. The relation ship of the teeth before removal, this will helps to construct prosthetic appliances that look natural.

•Evaluate trauma.•To determine the location and extent of fractures.•Malignancies.•injuries to TMJ

Page 104: Radiograph sem

Image receptor and patient placement

The image receptor is positioned parallel to the

patient’s midsagittal plane

The site of interest is placed towards

the image receptors to minimize distortion

The patient is placed with the left

side towards the image receptor

A wedge filter at the tube head is

positioned over the anterior aspect of

the beam to absorb some of the

radiation and to allow visualization of soft tissues of the

face.

LATERAL SKULL PROJECTION (LATERAL CEPHALOMETRIC PROJECTION)

Page 105: Radiograph sem

Position of the central x-ray beam

The central beam is perpendicular to the midsagittal plane of the patient and

the plane of the image receptor and is central over the external auditory

meatus

Page 106: Radiograph sem

Cephalostats have ear rods that stabilizes the patient’s head parallel to the film and at right angle to the direction of the beam

The Cephalometer allows the exposure to be taken several times for the same patient in the same head position

Page 107: Radiograph sem

5 feet

X-ray source

Cephalostat

Film

• For cephalometric applications the distance should be 152.4 cm (60 inches) between the x-ray source and the midcoronal plane.

• This increased distance provides an resultant image with a broader gray scale of the patient.

Page 108: Radiograph sem

Resultant image Exact

superimposition of

right and left sides

is impossible

because

structures on the

side near the

image receptor

are magnified less

than the same

structure on the

side far from the

image receptor.

Bilateral structures close to the

midsagittal plane demonstrate

less discrepancy in size

compared with bilateral

structures farther away from the

midsagittal plane.

Structures close to

the midsagittal

plane (e.g., the

clinoid processes

and inferior

turbinate's) should

be nearly

superimposed.

Page 109: Radiograph sem

USES

• Asymmetry• Trauma• Developmental

abnormalities• Fractures of skull

vault• Investigation of

frontal sinus• Conditions

affecting cranium( Paget's disease, multiple myeloma, hyperparathyroidism.)

• Intracranial calcification

Posteroanterior (PA) cephalometric projection

Shows the entire skull in a Posteroanterior plane.

The beam passes through the skull in a posterior to anterior direction.

Page 110: Radiograph sem

• The image receptor is placed in front of the patient, perpendicular to the midsagittal plane and parallel to the coronal plane.

• The patient is positioned so that the canthomeatal line forms a 10-degree angle with the horizontal plane and the frankfort plane is perpendicular to the image receptor.

Page 111: Radiograph sem

The central beam is perpendicular to the image receptor, directed from the posterior to the anterior (hence the name postero-anterior) parallel to patient’s midsagittal plane and is centred at the level of the bridge of the nose

Page 112: Radiograph sem

The midsagittal plane should divide the skull into two symmetric halves.

The superior border of the petrous ridge should lie in the lower third of the orbit.

Resultant image

Page 113: Radiograph sem

To Evaluate the maxillary, frontal and

ethmoid sinuses..

Detecting the lefort’s fractures, zygomatic-

complex, naso-ethmoidal fractures, orbital blow out

fractures.

Water’s view projection

Also known as sinus projection.

It’s similar to the postero-anterior projection except that the center of interest is focused on the middle third of the face.

Page 114: Radiograph sem

The image receptor is placed in front of the

patient and perpendicular to the midsagittal plane..

The patient’s head is tilted upwards so that the canthomeatal line forms a 37-degree angle with the

image receptor.

If the patient’s mouth is open, the sphenoid sinus

will be seen superimposed over the

palate.

The central beam is perpendicular to the image receptor and centered in the

area of the maxillary sinuses.

technique

Page 115: Radiograph sem

The midsagittal plane should divide the skull image in to two symmetrical halves.

The petrous ridge of the temporal bone should be projected below the floor of the maxillary sinus

Resultant image

Page 116: Radiograph sem

To examine fractures of the condylar neck of the mandible.

Intracapsular fractures of the TMJ.

Condylar hyperplasia or hypoplasia.

Reverse –towne (open mouth) projection

Purpose:

Page 117: Radiograph sem

The image receptor is placed in front of the patient, perpendicular to the

midsagittal and parallel to the coronal plane.

The patient’s head is tilted downward so that the

canthomeatal line forms a 25 to 30-degree angle with the

image receptor.

To improve the visualization of the condyles, the patient’s mouth is opened so that the condylar heads are located

inferior to the articular eminence.

The central beam is perpendicular to the image

receptor and parallel to patient’s midsagittal plane and it is centered at the level of the

condyles.

technique

Page 118: Radiograph sem

Resultant image

The midsagittal plane (imaginary line extending from the middle of the foramen magnum and the posterior arch of the atlas through the middle of the bridge of the nose and the nasal septum) should divide the skull image into two symmetric halves.

The petrous ridge of the temporal bone should be superimposed at the inferior part of the occipital bone and the condylar heads should be projected inferior to the articular eminence.

Page 119: Radiograph sem

the base of the skull.

Sphenoid sinus

The position and orientation of the condyles

Fractures of the Zygomatic arch.

Submentovertex (base) projection

Purpose: Used to show

Page 120: Radiograph sem

The image receptor is positioned parallel to patient’s

transverse plane and perpendicular to the midsagittal

and coronal plane.

To achieve this, the patient’s neck is extended as far

backward as possible with the canthomeatal line forming a 10-

degree angle with the image receptor.

The central beam is perpendicular to the image receptor, directed from below the mandible towards the

vertex of the skull (hence the name) and centred about 2cm anterior to a

line connecting the right and left condyles.

technique

Page 121: Radiograph sem

The buccal and lingual cortical plates of the mandible should be projected as uniform opaque lines.

An underexposed view is required for the evaluation of the zygomatic arches because they will be over exposed or “burned out” on radiography obtained with normal exposure factors.

Resultant image

The midsagittal plane should divide the skull image into two symmetrical halves.

Page 122: Radiograph sem

Mandibular body

projection.

Mandibular ramus

projection

Lateral jaw (lateral oblique) projection

It has been largely replacead by panoramic radiographs but still taken when image details is needed.

Two types

Page 123: Radiograph sem

To Examine the posterior region of

the mandible.

Valuable in children, or Senile patients

who can’t withstand intraoral films.

Patients who have fractures or

swelling.

It evaluate the condition of the

bone and to locate impacted teeth or

large lesions.

Indications

Page 124: Radiograph sem

Cassette is positioned flat against the cheek and centered in the

molar- premolar area.

The lower border of the cassette is parallel

and at least 2 cm below the inferior

border of the mandible

Head position is tilted about 10 to 20 degree toward the side to be

examined and the chin is protruded.

Mandibular body projection –Film placement and head position

Page 125: Radiograph sem

The central ray is directed toward the molar-premolar region of the mandible from a point 2cm below the angle of

the opposite side of the mandible

Page 126: Radiograph sem

Resultant image

A clear image of the teeth, the alveolar ridge and the body of the mandible should be obtained.

If significant distortion is present, the head was tilted excessively.

If the contra-lateral side of the mandible is superimposed over the area of interest, the head was not tilted sufficiently.

Page 127: Radiograph sem

Image receptor is placed over the ramus and far enough posteriorly to include the condyle.

The lower border of the cassette is parallel and at

least 2cm below the inferior border of the

mandible.

The head is tilted toward the side being examined so that the condyle

of the area of interest and the contra-lateral angle of the mandible form a

horizontal line. The mandible is protruded.

The central beam is directed the center of the imaged

ramus, from 2cm below the inferior border of the opposite side of the

mandible at the area of the first molar.

Mandibular ramus projection

Page 128: Radiograph sem

• A clear image of the third molar-retro molar area, angle of the mandible, ramus and condylar head should be obtained.

• If significant distortion – head was tilted excessively

• If contralateral side of the mandible is superimposed over the area of interest – head was not tilted sufficiently

Resultant image

Page 129: Radiograph sem

• It provides a sagittal view of the lateral aspects of condyle and temporal component.

Used for

Trans cranial

Identifying gross osseous

changes on the lateral aspect of

the joint

Displaced condylar fractures

Range of motion

Page 130: Radiograph sem

• It provides a sagittal view of the medial pole of the condyle.

• Used for visualizing erosive changes of the condyle

Trans pharyngeal ( Parma) projection

-5 degree though the sigmoid notch of the opposite side

Page 131: Radiograph sem

Trans orbitalIt is similar to trans maxillary projection in that both provide an anterior view of the TMJ, perpendicular to trans cranial and trans pharyngeal.

Uses: To detect condylar neck fractures

Page 132: Radiograph sem

• Extra oral images should first be evaluated for overall quality

• Interpreting poor quality images can lead to diagnostic errors and subsequent treatment errors.

A thorough knowledge of normal radiographic anatomy and the

appearance of normal variants is critical for the identification of

pathology

Abnormalities cause disruption of normal anatomy

Detecting the altered anatomy precedes classifying the type of

change and developing a DD

Evaluation of the image

Page 133: Radiograph sem

Extra-oral Near Parallel TechniqueExtra-oral Near Parallel Technique

This technique is an alternative to the bisecting angle technique, for the maxillary molars. It is of particular use in cats, where the zygomatic arch superimposes over standard intra-oral bisecting angle views.

The patient is in lateral recumbency

The long axis of the target teeth is as near parallel to the film as possible and the beam is angled at approximately 70 degrees to the film and the target.

The mouth is opened, with a prop, to direct the beam onto the film without superimposing the maxillary teeth on the mandibular teeth

Page 134: Radiograph sem

Accuracy is dependent on the ability

to keep teeth as near parallel to film as

possible and to prevent superimposing the

maxillary teeth on the mandibular teeth.

Page 135: Radiograph sem

ORTHOPANTOMOGRAM

PANORAMIC IMAGING.

OPG

Page 136: Radiograph sem

Orthopantomography

iIt is a technique for producing single tomographic image of facial structures that includes both maxillary and mandibular dental arches & their supporting structures.

• Ortho – correct/straight

• Panorama-“an unobstructed view of a region in every direction”

• Tomography- “X-ray technique of making radiographs of layer of tissue depth, without interference of tissues above and below it.”

Page 137: Radiograph sem

Historical milestones for digital panoramic systems :

1985-1991-The first dental digital panoramic systems

were designed by McDavid et al.

1995-DXIS, the first dental digital panoramic x-rays system available in the

market, was introduced by Signet of France.

1997-SIDEXIS, of siemens (currently sirona dental

systems, germany) offered a digital option for ortophos

plus panoramic unit.

Digipan of trophy radiology (France) offered a digital

option for the OP 100 panoramic made by

instrumentarium (Finland).

1998-2004- Many panoramic manufacturers offered their

own digital systems.

2006- SCAN300FP, of ‘Ajat’ (Finland) is the latest

innovation offered

Page 138: Radiograph sem

Patero working independently, Numata were the first to describe the principles of panoramic radiography.

Dr. NUMATA 1934Dr.PAATERO 1934

Father of Panoramic Radiography

Page 139: Radiograph sem

To interpret OPG competently one must have a thorough understanding of the following :

1. Principles of Panoramic image formation.

2. Techniques for Patient positioning with head alignment 3. and their rationale.4. Radiographic appearance of normal anatomic structures.

Page 140: Radiograph sem

Principles of Panoramic image formation

Page 141: Radiograph sem

rotation center

filmtube head angled upward

Page 142: Radiograph sem

ROTATION CENTERis the pivotal point, or

axis, around which

the cassette carrier

and x-ray tube head

rotate.

* Depending on the

manufacturer, the

number and location

of the rotational

center differ:

ROTATION CENTER

Split image

Single-center rotation

Double-center rotationTriple-center rotation

Moving center rotation – Ellipso

pantomography

Page 143: Radiograph sem

Double-Center rotation

Page 144: Radiograph sem

Triple-center rotation

Page 145: Radiograph sem

Parts of the machine

X-ray tube head

Cassette and

carriage

assembly

Patient

positioning

device

Exposure control

Page 146: Radiograph sem

ProMax (PLANMECA)

Panoramic machine.

Scanora multimodality Panoramic machine.

Orthopantomography op 100 panoramic machine.

Page 147: Radiograph sem

Three-dimensional curved zone or image layer in which structures are reasonably well defined

Focal Trough, focal corridor

Depends upon :

1. Arch path

2. velocity of receptor and Tube head

3. Cassette size

Page 148: Radiograph sem

The occlusal plane is aligned so that it is lower anteriorly, angled 20 to 30 degrees below the horizontal plane.

Page 149: Radiograph sem

149

The four Diagnost

ic regions in OPG

The four Diagnost

ic regions in OPG

Dentoalveolar region

Maxillary region

Mandibular region

TMJ including retro maxillary and cervical region

Page 150: Radiograph sem

150

Maxillary region

Page 151: Radiograph sem

151

Mandibular regionMandibular region

Page 152: Radiograph sem

152

Dentoalveolar region

Dentoalveolar region

• Shape and angulation of roots.• Alveolar bone and periodontium• Shows gentle curve of occlusal plane

Page 153: Radiograph sem

153

Soft tissue images

Page 154: Radiograph sem

154

Air spaces

Air spaces

Page 155: Radiograph sem

Broad coverage of the facial bones and teeth. Low patient radiation dose.

Convenience of the examination for the

patient.

Ability to be used in patients unable to open

their mouths.

Patient's readily understand of panoramic

films, making them a useful visual aid in patient

education and case presentation.

Short time required - 3 to 4 minutes

Easy to store, compared to the large set of intra oral x-

rays which are typically used Principle advantages of

panoramic Images:

Page 156: Radiograph sem

DISADVANTAGES

DISADVANTAGES

Magnification, Geometric

distortion and overlapped

images.

Resolution of fine anatomic details of

peri-apical area and periodontal

structures is less.

Poor image is obtained when

sharp inclination of anterior teeth

towards labial or lingual side.

The spinal cord superimpose on anterior region.

Common to have overlapped teeth

images, particularly in premolar area.

Artefacts are common and may

easily be misinterpreted.

Expensive

Page 157: Radiograph sem

USES

• First examination of new patients (patients with multiple deep carious

lesions, with orthodontic and periodontal problems)

• Early diagnosis of dental anomalies (recommended especially at ages of

10, 15 and 20 years), to check dentition and to provide a timely diagnosis

of the odontogenic tumors or cysts

• Establishing the exact cause of missing teeth

• Radiographic examination of the teeth with endodontic treatment

• Odontogenic sinus disease suspicion

• Disorders of TMJ caused by malocclusion (in such cases, the

Orthopantomogram should be performed with the patient in habitual

occlusion)

• Facial and maxillary asymmetry

• Painful or asymptomatic swelling

Page 158: Radiograph sem

• Multiple dental extractions, with suspected osteomyelitis

• Examination of non-odontogenic cysts, tumors and tumor-like lesions of

bone tumors

• Suspicion of invasive bone tumors or bone metastases

• Neural tumors

• Unusual sensitivity of teeth, unusual eruption, spacing or migration of

teeth

• Radiographic examination of the oromaxillo-facial area in systemic

diseases and syndromes

• Maxillo-facial fractures and suspected post-traumatic fractures

• Before and after surgery in the oromaxillo-facial surgery.

Page 159: Radiograph sem

Panoramic Technique Errors

Page 160: Radiograph sem

Ghost image:- A ghost image looks like the real object except that it appears on the opposite side of the film.

Page 161: Radiograph sem

Shadow of vertebral column, usually from patient not standing straight

Page 162: Radiograph sem

Lead apron shadow

Page 163: Radiograph sem

Anterior teeth narrower and blurred

Page 164: Radiograph sem

Anterior teeth wider and blurred

Teeth too posterior

Page 165: Radiograph sem

Structures smaller on the side to which head is turned; larger on opposite side.

Page 166: Radiograph sem

Mandibular incisors shortened, V-shaped mandible

HEAD TIPPED DOWN

Page 167: Radiograph sem

HEAD TIPPED UP

Squared-off mandible, palate superimposed over maxillary teeth

Page 168: Radiograph sem

REVERSE OPG:

The chin rest was removed so that the patient can be positioned posteriorly such that the condylar region is moved closer to the

lateral centre of rotation within a fixed distance between the X ray source and the cassette.

The technique is simple to perform with the patient in the reverse position in an Orthopantomogram

Reverse panoramic radiography is a radiographic technique to view the lateral aspect of the condylar head and its neighboring

structures more clearly and with less distortion.

Page 169: Radiograph sem
Page 170: Radiograph sem

Advances in radiogrpahic techniques

Page 171: Radiograph sem

• Sustantial amount of bone loss is required in conventional radiograph to be detected in radiograph.

• Enables use of computerized images, can be stored, manipulated and corrected.

• Image is constructed using pixels• These pixels are arranged in grids and rows on

the sensor

Digital Radiogrpahy

Page 172: Radiograph sem

Image acquisitionTwo systems are thereDirectIndirect

Direct digiital radiogrpahy• Uses (CCD) sensor linked with a fiber optic to the computer system• Real time imaging radiography

Disadvantages• Limited sensor area depics one or two teeth• Sensor rigidity

Page 173: Radiograph sem

Direct Digital radiographyDirect Digital radiography• nondestructive test (NDT)• image is produced electronically, rather than on film, • very little lag time occurs between the item being

exposed to radiation and the resulting image. • the electronic image that is viewed results from the

radiation passing through the object being inspected and interacting with a screen of material that fluoresces or gives off light when the interaction occurs.

• Fluorescent elements of the screen form the image much as the grains of silver form the image in film radiography.

Page 174: Radiograph sem

• Commercial digora system

• Uses phosphor luminescence flexible film like radiation sensor placed

• Intraorally and exposed to x ray tubes\

• A laser scanner reads exposed plates offline and reveals digital image data.

Indirect Digital radiography

Page 175: Radiograph sem

Advantages • Dose reduction• Image manipulation• Measurements• 3-D reconstruction can be done• Storage• Environmental friendly

• contrast, density

• magnification of area of interest

• edge enhancement

• color renderingDisadvantages

• Expensive • Sensor cannot be sterlized, barriers can be used but if contamined they have to be discared• Medicolegal purposes- images can be manipulated, there are concerns about their use

Page 176: Radiograph sem

• The image formed is a "positive image" since brighter areas on the image indicate where higher levels of transmitted radiation reached the screen.

• This image is the opposite of the negative image produced in film radiography.

• The lighter, brighter areas represent thinner sections or less dense sections of the test object.

Page 177: Radiograph sem

Radio-visographyRadio-visography

• X rays takes using sensor that transmit images directly onto computer monitor

• Helps patient understand the doctors explanation more easily

• Enables the doctor to zoom in on a digitizes specific area of tooth

• digitizes ionizing radiation• Provides an instantaneous image on video

monitor• Reduces exposure by 90%• Equipment has fiber optic intra oral sensor (with

selenium coated plate)

Page 178: Radiograph sem

Radio-visiographyRadio-visiographyParts • The radio- hypersenitve intra oral sensor and

conventional X-ray unit.• The visio-> video moniter and display processing

u• The graphy>high resolution video printer that

instantly provides a hard copy of screen images using same video signal.

Page 179: Radiograph sem

• Advantages• Elimination of xray film• Significant reduction in exposure

time• Instantaneous image display• RVG System appears to be

promising for the future of dentistry.Disadvantages

• Resolution is slightly lower than convenional films

• Exposure above .15s at 75Kp reults in pixels saturation that results in shortening in saturation of the length of the intrument

Page 180: Radiograph sem

Digital Substraction Radiography

Digital Substraction Radiography

• Image enhancement method• Area under focus being clearly

displayed against a neutral gray black background or it is superimposed on the radiographic itself.

• Relies on conversion of serial radiogrpahs into digital images

• Quantitative changes can be accompalished by eans of a computer (Computer Assisted Substraction Radiography

Page 181: Radiograph sem

• Advantages•  reduced radiation up to 80% •  faster imaging without X-ray film and developing

images •  digital intraoral sensor is used instead of X-ray film• immediate imaging on the computer screen •  high quality of the digital image that can be analyzed

and processed• saving images in the patient's file• children friendly for reduced radiation, if imaging is

necessary• Evaluation of success of treatment• Changes in alveolar bone levels• Progress of an incipient carious lesion to DEJ• Assessing healing or expansion of periapical lesion after

RCT

Disadvantages • Need to be close to identical porjection alignment

during the exposure of sequential radiographs• Makes this method very impractical in a clinical

setting.

Page 182: Radiograph sem

• Recently , new image substraction methods DIAGNOSTIC SUBSTRACTION RADIOGRAPHY (DSR) have been introduced combining use of a positioning device during film exposure with a specialized software.

Page 183: Radiograph sem

Computed TomographyComputed Tomography• powerful nondestructive evaluation (NDE) technique

for producing 2-D and 3-D cross-sectional images of an object from flat X-ray images.

• Characteristics of the internal structure of an object such as dimensions, shape, internal defects, and density are readily available from CT images.

Page 184: Radiograph sem

• The test component is placed on a turntable stage that is between a radiation source and an imaging system.

• The turntable and the imaging system are connected to a computer

• 2-dimensional shadowgraph image of the specimen just like a film radiograph.

• Specialized computer software produces cross-sectional images of the test component as if it was being sliced.

Page 185: Radiograph sem

IndicationsIndications• Investigation of intracranial disease including tumours,

haemorrhage & infarcts.• Suspected intra cranial, spinal cord damage.• Fractures-In the orbit, naso- ethmoid complex. - Cranial base. -Odontoid peg - Cervical spine

• Cyst-Site, size & extent.• Disease within para nasal air sinuses.-• Tumor staging- site, size, extent of affecting different

regions. • Tumour and tumour like discreet swellings both

intrinsic and extrinsic to salivary glands.• Investigation of osteomyelitis.• Investigation of TMJ.• Preoperative assessment of maxillary and mandibular

alveolar bone height.•

Page 186: Radiograph sem

Advantages Disadvantages

Very small amounts and differences in x-ray thus detailed imaging of intra cranial lesions, imaging of hard and soft tissues both hard and soft tissues.

Axial tomographic sections are obtainable.

Reconstructed images can be obtained from information obtained I the axial plane.

Images an be enhanced by the use of IV contrast media to delineate blood vessels.

• Equipment is very expensive.

• Very thin contiguous or overlapping slices result in very high dose investigation.

• Metallic objects produce marked streak or artifacts.

• Inherent risks associated with IV contrast agents.

Page 187: Radiograph sem

• Also known as digital volume tomography/(CBCT) are a variation of traditional CTsystems.

• used by dental professionals • rotate around the patient, capturing data using a cone-

shaped X-ray beam. • reconstruct a three-dimensional (3D) image of the

following regions of the patient’s anatomy: dental (teeth); oral and maxillofacial region (mouth, jaw, and neck); and ears, nose, and throat.

• One an is 20-40secs, and in one scan image I cylindrical in volume described as field of view.

• Field of view of 15cm diameter is used for scanning maxillofacial skeleton

CONE BEAM CT

Page 188: Radiograph sem

CT CBCT

200-300 conventional radiographs.

2-8 conventional panoramic radiographs

.When compared with ortho pantamogram

3D accuitomo images a small cylinder of information thus enabling high resolution images of specific teeth to be obtained.Voxel size is 0.125mm x 0.125 mm x 0.125mm.Dose of this very low when compared to 3-4 peri apical radiographs.

Page 189: Radiograph sem

IndicationsIndications• Investigation of all conditions affecting the mandible

or maxilla including cysts, tumours, giant cells and osseous dysplasia.

• Cleft palate assesment• Investigation of maxillary antra• Investigation of TMJ.• Implant assessment .• Orthodontic assessment.• Localisation of unerupted tooth/ odontomes.• Assessment of lower 3rd molars .• Investigation of fractures of mandible or middle 1/3rd

of facial skeleton.• For multi planar imaging of a single tooth in terms of

peri apical & periodontal tissue with high resolution scanners.

Page 190: Radiograph sem

Advantage Disadvantage

• Multi planar imaging and manipulation.

• Low radiation dose• Very fast scanning

time.• Inexpensive and

affordable.• Used mainly for

implant and cephalometric planning

• Soft tissue detailing is not possible.

• Computer derived panoramic image I not comparable with conventional panoramic radiographs- particular are is needed for interpretation.

• Metallic fillings/objects produce streaks and star artefacts like CT.

J of canadian dental association 2006

Page 191: Radiograph sem

MRIMRIPrincipleRadio frequency signal emitted by excited hydrogen atoms in the body (present in any tissue containing  water molecules) using energy from an  oscillating magnetic field applied at the appropriate  resonant frequency. The orientation of the image is controlled by varying the main magnetic field using gradient coils. coils are rapidly switched on and off they create the characteristic repetitive noises of an MRI scan. The contrast between different tissues is determined by rate at which excited atoms return to the  equilibrium state, Exogenous contrast agents may be given  intravenously, orally or intrarticulary.[

Current science , VOL 67 , No 12, 25 dec 1994

Page 192: Radiograph sem

IndicationsIndications• three-dimensional hard- and soft-tissue imaging of

teeth without the use of ionizing radiation. • potential to image minute dental structures within

clinically relevant scanning times. • Endodontists-potential method to longitudinally

evaluate teeth where pulp and root structures have been regenerated.

• Distinguish between various soft tissues and localisation of soft tissue lesions.

• Stray field microscope- modification of MRI – can detect canals in tooh for endodontic purposes

• Differentiate aglossia from hypoglossia• TMJ displacements and related problems

 J.endod 2011 Jun;37(6):745-52.

Page 193: Radiograph sem

contraindicationscontraindications• Ferromagnestic substance s like

pacemaker,shrpnels,etc could be disloged causing complications.

• Chromic alloy arch wires, stainless steel crowns. Banda and bonded metals cause artifacts

Page 194: Radiograph sem

Ultra soundUltra sound

• Non-invasive investigation which use a very high frequency (7.5-20MHz) pulsed ultrasound beam rather than ionizing radiation.

• Produces high resolution images of more superficial structures.

Oral surg oral med oral pathol oral radiol 203 june

Page 195: Radiograph sem

Ultrasound travels to the

skin

Some waves are reflected back by tissues to

produce echoes.

Which is picked up by the

transducer and converted into electrical signal

then into real time black , white and

grey images

Page 196: Radiograph sem

• sectional image which represents topographical map of depth of tissue interfaces.

• thickness is determined by width of ultra sound beam thus different density in the black /white echo picture is described as hypo echoic(dark) or hyper echoic(light).

• A change in the frequency of sound reflected from a moving source allows the detection of arterial and venous blood flow - Doppler effect.

Oral surg oral med oral pathol oral raiol 203 june

Page 197: Radiograph sem

1. caries detection, 2. dental fractures3. soft tissue and periapical lesions4. maxillofacial fractures 5. periodontal bony defects6. gingival and muscle thickness7. Temporomandibular disorders8. Implant dentistry.9. Evaluation of the swellings of the neck ,those

involving thyroid, cervical lymph nodes, major salivary glands thus to detect solid and cystic soft tissue masses.

10. Detection of salivary gland and duct calculi.11. Determination of vascularity and vascular

structures.12. Assessment of vascularity of carotids and carotid

tumors.13. Sialolithotripter –to break salivary calculi into 2mm

fragments thus avoiding major surgery.14. Ultra sound guided FNA biopsy.

Indications :-Indications :-

Page 198: Radiograph sem

Advantage Disadvantage

• Non ionizing radiation.• No known harmful

effects• Good differentiation

between soft and hard tissues.

• Widely available and relatively in expensive.

• Bone absorbs ultrasound thus is not detected.

• Real time imaging.• Technique sensitive• Difficult to interpret

for inexperienced operator.

Oral surg oral med oral pathol oral raiol 203 june

Page 199: Radiograph sem

Contrast studiesContrast studies

Radiopaque substances alter the density of different

parts of patient.

Alters the subject contrast.

Thus certain organs , structures, tissues, invisible by conventional means

be seen.

Page 200: Radiograph sem

Different contrast studiesDifferent contrast studiesSialography –Salivary

glands.

Arthrography

Angiography

Lymphography- Lymph nodes and

vessels

Urography

Barium meal, swallow and enema-GI tract.

Computed tomography-general

enhancement.

Page 201: Radiograph sem

IndicationsIndications

To show vascular anatomy and feeder vessels associated with haemangiomas.

To show vascular anatomy of arterio venous formation

Investigation of suspected sub-arachnoid haemorrhage resulting from an aneurysm in

the circle of willis.

Investigation of transient ischaemic attacks due to emboli from atheromatous plaques.

Page 202: Radiograph sem

ComplicationsComplications• Mild. Eg:-Headache, nausea, warmth/pain,

flushing, sneezing, constipation.• Moderate. Eg :-Vomiting , bronchopasm,

urticaria and hypotension. • Severe. Eg:-Cardiac arrhythmias, cardiac

arrest, convulsions, anaphylactic shock and pulmonary edema.

• Fatal.

Page 203: Radiograph sem

Patients at riskPatients at risk

1. Very young patients2. Patients with a history of allergy to

contrast media3. Diabetes, patients suffering from cardiac

failure, renal failure, severe pulmonary disorders including asthma

Cause of complications• Allergy• Chemotoxicity• Osmolality• Anxiety

Page 204: Radiograph sem

Hazards of dental x-rays in oral cavity

Hazards of dental x-rays in oral cavity

• da Silva et al have demonstrated that panoramic radiography increases the number of nuclear anomalies (except micronuclei), with significant statistically differences in exfoliated cells from the lateral border of the tongue,

• were exposed to a repeat radiograph it induces a genotoxic effect on epithelial gingival cells that increases the frequency of chromosomal damage and nuclear alterations indicative of apoptosis.

• The comparison of nuclear changes before and after radiation exposure revealed a statistically higher number of broken eggs, buds, karyorrhexis and binucleate cells 10 days after exposure.

.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012 March; 41(3): 181–184

Page 205: Radiograph sem

• X-ray increased other nuclear alterations closely related to cytotoxicity, such as karyorrhexis, pyknosis and karyolysis.

•  Digital lateral radiography (cephalometric radiography) obtained on a panoramic radiographic machine showed similar results when compared with conventional radiography in oral mucosa cells.

• Yoon et al18 revealed high expression levels of pChk2 and γ-H2AX in oral cells after radiation exposure.-indicators of low-dose radiation exposure.

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012 March; 41(3): 181–184

Page 206: Radiograph sem

• When the effect of dental X-ray exposure in children was investigated, no statistically significant differences were found between micronucleated oral mucosa cells before and after radiation exposure.

• radiation did lead to other nuclear alterations closely related to cytotoxicity, including karyorrhexis, pyknosis and karyolysis: there were significant statistically.

• CBCT in clinical practice evaluated DNA damage (micronucleus) and cellular death (pyknosis, karyolysis and karyorrhexis) in exfoliated buccal mucosa cells from adults. The effective dose was 12 μSv.

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012 March; 41(3): 181–184

Page 207: Radiograph sem

RADIATION PROTECTIONRADIATION PROTECTION

• Radiation is energy in the form of waves or moving subatomic particles.

Page 208: Radiograph sem

TYPES OF RADIATIONTYPES OF RADIATION

• NON-IONIZING RADIATION

• IONIZING RADIATION• capable for producing ions

when interact with matter. PARTICULATE (alpha, beta,

neutrons) ELECTROMAGNETIC (X-Rays,

Gamma Rays)

Page 210: Radiograph sem

PATIENT EXPOSURE & DOSE

PATIENT EXPOSURE & DOSE

• Patient dose from dental radiography is usually reported as the amount of radiation received by a target organ.

• Most common measurements is skin or surface exposure.

• Other target organs - Mean active bone marrow, thyroid & gonads.

Page 211: Radiograph sem

• The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) devised a system of dose limitation.

Based on following general principles:• No practice shall be adopted unless its

introduction produces a positive net benefit.• All exposures shall be kept as low as

reasonably achievable (ALARA), taking economic & social factors in account.

• The dose equivalent to individuals shall not exceed the limits recommended by the commission.

Page 212: Radiograph sem

What is ALARAWhat is ALARA• ALARA is an acronym for As Low As

reasonably Achievable. This is a radiation safety principle for

minimizing radiation doses and releases of radioactive materials by employing all reasonable methods.

• regulatory requirement for all radiation safety programs

• Current radiation safety philosophy is based on the assumption that radiation dose and its

• biological effects on living tissues are modeled by a relationship known as the “Linear Hypothesis

Page 213: Radiograph sem

Mitigation of External Radiation Exposures The three (3) major principles to assist with

maintaining doses ALARA are : 1) TIME – minimizing the time of exposure

directly reduces radiation dose. 2) DISTANCE – doubling the distance between

your body and the radiation source will divide the radiation exposure by a factor of 4. 3) SHIELDING - using absorber materials such

as Plexiglas for beta particles and lead for X-rays

and gamma rays is an effective way to reduce

radiation exposures

Page 214: Radiograph sem

Mitigation of Internal Radiation Exposures 1) Good hygiene techniques that prohibit the consumption of food and drink in the lab and the control of personal gestures that involve “hand-to- mouth” contacts. 2) Frequent swipe surveys and lab area monitoring of

work areas, refrigerators, hoods, sinks, phones and computer keyboards, etc.

3) Control contamination with absorbent paper and spill trays, properly labeled waste containers, equipment, etc. and prompt decontamination of any detected contamination.

4) Use fume hoods for materials which could become airborne (e.g., vapors, dust, aerosols, etc.) and present an inhalation hazard to workers.

5) Use proper protective equipment (PPE) such as disposable gloves, safety glasses, lab coats, etc. to

reduce the possibility of ingestion or absorption of radioactive materials

Page 215: Radiograph sem

Maximum Annual Occupational Dose Limits

Maximum Annual Occupational Dose Limits

Whole Body …………………… 5000 millirem Extremities ……………………. 50000 millirem Lens of the Eye ……………….. 15000 millirem Fetus ……………………………… 500 millirem* Individuals in the General Public …100 millirem * 500 millirem for the fetus is during the gestation periodThe ALARA concept imposes lower operational dose limits that are even more restrictive than the maximum legal dose limits in the table above.If a radiation worker’s dose for any calendar quarter (3 months) or calendar year (12 month period) exceeds these values, an investigation is conducted by

the RSO to determine if there are reasonable ways to reduce

the dose levels and discuss with the worker methods for limiting the potential dose

Page 216: Radiograph sem

ICRP divided the population into 3 groups:

• PATIENTS• RADIATION WORKERS• GENERAL PUBLIC

Page 217: Radiograph sem

PATIENTSPATIENTS

• Examination directly associated with illness.

• Systemic examinations (periodic health checks)

• Examination for occupational, medico-legal insurance purposes.

• Medical research.

Page 218: Radiograph sem

RADIATION WORKERSRADIATION WORKERS

• Exposed to radiation during the course of their work.

• Divided into 2 subgroups depending on the level of occupational exposure:CLASSIFIED WORKERSNON-CLASSIFIED WORKERS

Page 219: Radiograph sem

CLASSIFIED WORKERSCLASSIFIED WORKERS• Receive high levels of radiation

exposure to radiation at work (nuclear power industry)

• Require compulsory personal monitoring.

• Require compulsory annual health checks.

Page 220: Radiograph sem

NON-CLASSIFIED WORKERSNON-CLASSIFIED WORKERS• Receive low levels of exposure to

radiation at work.• The annual dose limits are 3/10 of

the classified worker’s limit.• Personal monitoring is not

compulsory.• Annual health checks are not

required.

Page 221: Radiograph sem

GENERAL PUBLICGENERAL PUBLIC• Originally set annual dose limits - 5

mSv.• Current recommendation - 1 mSv.

Page 222: Radiograph sem

SOURCES OF RADIATION IN DENTAL RADIOLOGY

SOURCES OF RADIATION IN DENTAL RADIOLOGY

• PRIMARY BEAM• SECONDARY RADIATION• STRAY RADIATION• SCATTERED RADIATION

Page 223: Radiograph sem

CONDUCT OF EXAMINATIONCONDUCT OF EXAMINATION

• CHOICE OF EQUIPMENT• CHOICE OF TECHNIQUE• OPERATION OF THE EQUIPMENT• PROCESSING OF THE RADIOGRAPH• INTERPRETATION OF THE RADIOGRAPH

Page 224: Radiograph sem

CHOICE OF THE EQUIPMENT

CHOICE OF THE EQUIPMENT

• IMAGE RECEPTER• FOCAL SPOT TO FILM DISTANCE• COLLIMATION• FILTERATION• POSITION INDICATING DEVICE• FILM HOLDING DEVICE• LEADED APRONS AND COLLARS

Page 225: Radiograph sem

INTRAORAL IMAGE RECEPTOR

INTRAORAL IMAGE RECEPTOR

• In 1920, regular dental X-ray film – EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY.

• Intraoral dental X-ray film – D & E speed.• Speed of E-speed film – 2 times of D-speed

film & 50 times of regular dental X-ray film.• E-speed film (Ektaspeed film, Eastman

Kodak Company) - 1981.

Page 226: Radiograph sem

• Patient dose reductions :– 60% compared with E-speed film.– 77% compared with D-speed film.

• Digital Imaging – 50 to 95% reduction in patient exposure.

Page 227: Radiograph sem

EXTRAORAL FILMS/INTENSIFYING

SCREENS

EXTRAORAL FILMS/INTENSIFYING

SCREENS

• Calcium tungstate – emits blue light.• Rare earth elements Gadolinium &

Lanthanum – emits green light.• Rare earth screens -

– 8 times more sensitive to X-rays.– 55% reduction in patient

exposure.

Page 228: Radiograph sem

FOCAL SPOT TO FILM DISTANCEFOCAL SPOT TO FILM DISTANCE

• 2 standard FSFDs: – 8 inches (20 cm) – 16 inches (41 cm)

• Federation Regulation – Minimum X-ray source-skin distance: – 7 inches (18 cm) X-ray tube operating

above 50 kVp.– 4 inches (10 cm) X-ray tube operating

below 50 kVp.

Page 229: Radiograph sem
Page 230: Radiograph sem

• COMPARISION OF 16 INCHES AND 8 INCHES FOCAL SPOT:– 38% decrease in thyroid dose with 90

kVp X-rays.– 45% decrease in thyroid dose with 70

kVp X-rays.

• Longer FSFD – 32% reduction in exposed tissue volume.

Page 231: Radiograph sem

COLLIMATIONCOLLIMATION• Helps to control the size & shape of X-

ray beam.• Recommended beam size – 23/4 inches.

Page 232: Radiograph sem

• Decreases radiation exposure.• Minimizes scattered radiation Decreases fogging of film

Sharper image & better contrast

Page 233: Radiograph sem
Page 234: Radiograph sem

• Collimation is done with lead diaphragm within the tube head or at the end of lead-lined cylinder.

• 2 types : Round & Rectangular.

Page 235: Radiograph sem

DENSPLY/RINN RECTANGULAR COLLIMATOR

Page 236: Radiograph sem

MARSEL PRECISION INSTRUMENT

Page 237: Radiograph sem

• Round collimator – 3 times the area necessary to expose the film.

• Rectangular collimator reduces patient dose approx 55%.

Page 238: Radiograph sem

FILTERATIONFILTERATION

• Filteration removes the low energy X-ray photons selectively from the X-ray beam.

• Filteration is stated in mm of Al.

Page 239: Radiograph sem

TYPES OF FILTERATIONTYPES OF FILTERATION• INHERENT FILTERATION – 0.5 to 1.0 mm

of Al.• ADDED FILTERATION – 0.5 mm of Al.• TOTAL FILTERATION – Inherent + Added

filteration

Page 240: Radiograph sem

• X-ray beam filtered with 3 mm of Al – surface exposure reduces by 20%.

Page 241: Radiograph sem

• Al + rare earth materials like Samariun, Erbium, Yttrium, Niobium, Gadolinium, etc

• Selective filteration of low & high energy photons ( X-ray energies most effective in producing image: 35 keV to 55 keV)

• Reduces patient exposure by 20% to 80%

Page 242: Radiograph sem

POSITION INDICATING DEVICE (PID)

POSITION INDICATING DEVICE (PID)

• PID - an extension of X-ray tubehead.• Direct the X-ray tube.• Minimize the volume of tissue

irradiated.• 3 basic types :

– Conical– Rectangular– Round

Page 243: Radiograph sem

CONICAL PID

Page 244: Radiograph sem

POSITION INDICATING DEVICE (PID)

Page 245: Radiograph sem

• PIDs are commonly available in 3 lengths :– 8 inches– 12 inches– 16 inches

• Long PID is preferred.

Page 246: Radiograph sem

FILM HOLDING DEVICEFILM HOLDING DEVICE• Helps to stabilize the film position in the

mouth.

Page 247: Radiograph sem

OFFER PROTECTION TO THE PATIENT :• Reduces frequency of retakes.• External guide to indicate the film

position.• Possibility of misalignment of the X-ray

tube. • Collimate the beam to the size of film

being used.• Reduction in the exposure to patient’s

fingers.

Page 248: Radiograph sem

PROTECTIVE BARRIERSPROTECTIVE BARRIERS• LEAD APRONS• THYROID COLLARS

Page 249: Radiograph sem

LEAD APRONSLEAD APRONS• A flexible shield of lead placed over the

patient chest & lap.• To protect reproductive organs & bone

marrow.• Recommended for all intraoral &

extraoral radiography. • Protective equivalent – 1/4 mm of Pb.

Page 251: Radiograph sem

• Attenuate 98% of scatter radiation to the gonads.

• LEADED TORSO (BODY) aprons

Page 252: Radiograph sem

THYROID COLLARTHYROID COLLAR• Flexible lead shield placed securly

around the patient’s neck.• Protect thyroid gland.• Recommended for intraoral radiographs.• Reduce the thyroid gland exposure by

92%.

Page 253: Radiograph sem
Page 254: Radiograph sem

CHOICE OF INTRAORAL TECHNIQUE

CHOICE OF INTRAORAL TECHNIQUE

• Bisecting angle technique• Paralleling long cone technique• Rinn XCP instrument / Precision

instrument.

Page 255: Radiograph sem

OPERATION OF THE EQUIPMENT

OPERATION OF THE EQUIPMENT

• KILOVOLTAGE (kV)• MILLIAMPERAGE (mA)• TIME SETTINGS

Page 256: Radiograph sem

KILOVOTAGE (kVp)KILOVOTAGE (kVp)• X-ray machine : 70 – 90 kVp.• Produce fewer low-energy X-rays.• Gibbs etal (1988) reported that effective

dose reduces to 23% - increasing kVp from 70 to 90 kVp.

• Constant potential X-ray machine – reduces patient exposure by 20%.

Page 257: Radiograph sem

• Higher kVp – periodontal diagnosis.• Low kVp – caries or soft tissue

calcification.

Page 258: Radiograph sem

MILLLIAMPERE-SCONDS (mAs)

MILLLIAMPERE-SCONDS (mAs)

• X-ray machine : 8-10 mA.• IMAGE DENSITY – milliamperage &

exposure time.• Exposure time – most crucial factor

influencing diagnostic quality of radiographs.

Page 259: Radiograph sem

TIMERTIMER• Timer on the X-ray machine should be

electronic.• “dead-end” control.• Calibrated in 60th of sec.

Page 260: Radiograph sem

PROCESSING OF THE RADIOGRAPHS

PROCESSING OF THE RADIOGRAPHS

• DARKROOM LIGHTING• FULL DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING• PROCESSING SOLUTIONS

Page 261: Radiograph sem

DARKROOM LIGHTINGDARKROOM LIGHTING• Kept free from light leaks.• Safelight filter – Kodak GBX-2 (red light)• 15 watt bulb.• Safelight lamps – min of 4 ft from

working area.

Page 262: Radiograph sem

FULL DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING

FULL DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING

• Time-temperature processing• Radiation exposure may be decreased

by 25%.

TEMPERATURE (in OF) DEVELOPMENT TIME (in min)

68 5

70 41/2

72 4

76 3

80 21/2

Page 263: Radiograph sem

PROCESSING SOLUTIONSPROCESSING SOLUTIONS• Changed regularly• Stirred thoroughly twice each day• Kept covered to prevent oxidation• Not subjected to excessively high

temperatures.• Weekly quality control checks.• Chemicals should be replenished

according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Page 264: Radiograph sem

INTERPRETATION OF RADIOGRAPHS

INTERPRETATION OF RADIOGRAPHS

• Viewed in a dimly lit room with a properly functioning illuminator (view-box).

• Illuminator with variable intensity.

Page 265: Radiograph sem

3 basic methods to reduce occupational exposure:3 basic methods to reduce occupational exposure:

• POSITION• DISTANCE• SHIELDING

OPERATOR RADIATION PROTECTION

OPERATOR RADIATION PROTECTION

Page 266: Radiograph sem

DISTANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

DISTANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

• 6 feet away from X-ray tubehead during exposure.

• When distance is not possible – Protective lead barrier

Page 267: Radiograph sem

POSITION RECOMMENDATIONS

POSITION RECOMMENDATIONS

• 90o to 135o angle to the primary beam.• Never hold a film in place for a patient• Never hold or stabilize the tubehead ………during radiation exposure.

Page 268: Radiograph sem

Dystrophic nail changes Squamous cell carcinoma

Page 269: Radiograph sem

POSITION DISTANCE RULE“The operator should stand at least 6 feet

away from the patient in a safe quadrant at an angle of 90o to 135o to

the central ray of X-ray beam.”

Page 270: Radiograph sem

SHIELDING RECOMMENDATIONS

SHIELDING RECOMMENDATIONS

Page 271: Radiograph sem

ROLLING RADIATION PROTECTION SHIELDROLLING RADIATION PROTECTION SHIELD

• Offers 0.5 mm lead protection.

• Measures 24 X 231/2.

• Adjusts 36”-56” above the floor.

Page 272: Radiograph sem

PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT

PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT

• Surrounding environment must be protected from radiation to avoid the exposure of persons in the environment.

• Primary beam should never be directed at any one other than the patient.

• X-ray beam is aimed at the wall of the room and not through door.

Page 273: Radiograph sem

QUALITY ASSURANCEQUALITY ASSURANCE “Any systemic action to ensure that a

dental office will produce consistently high-quality images with minimal

exposure to patients & personnel.”

“Currently some state require dental offices to establish written guidelines

for quality assurance & maintain written records of quality assurance test.”

Page 274: Radiograph sem

Quality assurance

X ray unit

Leakage radiation

Stability of tube

housing

CollimationTimer accuracy

Ancillary instrument maintenanc

e

Dark room maintenance

Page 275: Radiograph sem
Page 276: Radiograph sem

VARIOUS RADIATION MONITORING DEVICES

AVAILABLE:

VARIOUS RADIATION MONITORING DEVICES

AVAILABLE:• ELECTRICAL

– Ionization chamber– Thimble chamber– Geiger counter

• CHEMICAL– Film– Chemical dosimeter

• LIGHT– Scintillation counter– Gerenkov counter

• THERMOLUMINESCENCE– Thermoluminescent dosimeter

• HEAT– Calorimeter

Page 277: Radiograph sem

PERSONAL MONITORING DEVICES

PERSONAL MONITORING DEVICES

• POCKET DOSIMETER• FILM BADGE• THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETER

(TLD)• ELECTRONIC DOSIMETER

Page 278: Radiograph sem

• Modified version of badge

Page 279: Radiograph sem

THERMOLUMINESCENCE DOSIMETER (TLD)

THERMOLUMINESCENCE DOSIMETER (TLD)

• Most common personal monitoring device.

• Used for measurements of the actual dose received by the operator.

Page 280: Radiograph sem

ELECTRONIC DOSIMETERELECTRONIC DOSIMETER• 5 to 200 times more sensitive than TLD.• With an audible alarm system.

Page 281: Radiograph sem

Unique Considerations for Radiation Exposure in Children in

CT scans

Unique Considerations for Radiation Exposure in Children in

CT scans

• There are three unique considerations in children.• Children are considerably more sensitive to radiation

than adults, as demonstrated in epidemiologic studies of exposed populations.

• longer life expectancy than adults- larger window of opportunity for expressing radiation damage.

• The risk for developing a radiation-related cancer can be several times higher for a young child.

• The use of more than one scan further increase the radiation dose.

• Majority of cases, a single scan should be sufficient during pediatric CT.

University of Michigan Children hospital site

Page 282: Radiograph sem

Radiation reductionRadiation reductionPerform only necessary CT examinations-• When appropriate, other modalities such as ultrasound MRI,

which do not use ionizing radiation, should be considered.Adjust exposure parameters for pediatric CT based on

– Child size: guidelines based on individual size / weight parameters should be used.

– Region scanned: the region of the body scanned should be limited to the smallest necessary area.

– Organ systems scanned: lower mA and/or kVp settings should be considered for skeletal, lung imaging, and some CT angiographic and follow up examinations.

• Scan resolution: the highest quality images are not always required to make diagnoses. many cases, lower-resolution scans are diagnostic.

• Providers should be familiar with the multiphase examinations. These result in a considerable increase in dose and are rarely necessary, especially in body (chest and abdomen) imaging.

University of Michigan Children hospital site

Page 283: Radiograph sem

“value of a diagnostic procedure depends upon the amount of information that can be derived from it”

Although these radiographic techniques are essential in arriving at a diagnosis, appropriate usage of the right technique in the right time to an apt condition becomes vital to the clinician in guiding to arrive at a conclusion for diagnosis and there by treatment planning

CONCLUSION

Page 284: Radiograph sem

ReferencesReferences

Principles and Interpretations of Oral Radiology, 5th Edition By Stuart C.WHITE and MICHAEL J.Pharoah.

Essentials of Dental Radiography, 3rd Edition by Haring . Text Book of dental and maxillofacial Radiology By Frenry

R. Karjodkar.. Essentials of Dental radiology and radiology,3rd edition,

Eric whites Text book of Pedodontics (Mc Donald & Avery) Oral radiology- principles and interpretation; Paul W.

Goaz, Stuart C. White Web Page – Radiographic techniques for pediatric patients

(steven Schwartz) dentalcare.com Intra-Oral Radio Graphs for the Pediatric Dental

Patient Pedo- fourth molar web page

Page 285: Radiograph sem