11
Fukushima Nuclear Accident Radiological Monitoring and Consequences 2 June 2011

Radiological Monitoring and Consequences of Fukushima Nuclear Accident (2 June 2011)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Radiological Monitoring and Consequences of Fukushima Nuclear Accident (2 June 2011)

Citation preview

Page 1: Radiological Monitoring and Consequences of Fukushima Nuclear Accident (2 June 2011)

Fukushima Nuclear Accident

Radiological Monitoring and Consequences

2 June 2011

Page 2: Radiological Monitoring and Consequences of Fukushima Nuclear Accident (2 June 2011)

Gamma Dose Rate in 47 Prefectures  on  31 May

Fukushima prefecture: 1.5 µSv/h 

Page 3: Radiological Monitoring and Consequences of Fukushima Nuclear Accident (2 June 2011)

Gamma Dose Rates in 7 Prefectures24 March – 31 May

Natural background: 0.1 microSievert/hour

Page 4: Radiological Monitoring and Consequences of Fukushima Nuclear Accident (2 June 2011)

Gamma dose rate in the East of Fukushima prefecture

Page 5: Radiological Monitoring and Consequences of Fukushima Nuclear Accident (2 June 2011)

Concentration in air of I‐131 and Cs‐137 detectedat Fukushima Daiichi West Gate (at a distance of 1 Km to NPPs)

Page 6: Radiological Monitoring and Consequences of Fukushima Nuclear Accident (2 June 2011)

Deposition of I‐131 and Cs‐137 in 47 prefectures

• I‐131 – Not detected since 18 May

• Cs‐137– Detected in a few prefectures over a few days– Low levels ranging from 2.2 to 91 Bq/m2

Page 7: Radiological Monitoring and Consequences of Fukushima Nuclear Accident (2 June 2011)

Protective actions 

• Drinking water: All restriction lifted 

• The Government of Japan has announced evacuation measures:– Beyond distances of 30 km from Fukushima Nuclear Power Plants 

– NISA: evacuation of the “Planned Evacuation Zones” within Iitate village and Kawamata town commenced on 15 May.

Page 8: Radiological Monitoring and Consequences of Fukushima Nuclear Accident (2 June 2011)

Food Monitoring and Food Restrictions(Reported 19 – 31 May)

• 818 samples from 18 prefectures• Over 40% of monitoring is in Fukushima prefecture• Over 93% of samples indicated Cs‐134 /Cs‐137 or I‐131 

were not detected or were below the Japanese regulation values

• Less than 7% were above the Japanese regulation values for Cs‐134 /Cs‐137 and/or I‐131

• Restrictions on the distribution and/or consumption of specific foods in certain areas of Fukushima and Ibaraki prefectures remain in place

Page 9: Radiological Monitoring and Consequences of Fukushima Nuclear Accident (2 June 2011)

77

300

36

2 2

116

4

22

2

28

4 9

55

39

11

32

18

96

33

1

9

21

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350Nu

mbe

r of s

ampl

es

Prefecture

Total number of food samples tested between 19 and 31 May 2011

Neg

Cs-total

Cs-total & I-131

Page 10: Radiological Monitoring and Consequences of Fukushima Nuclear Accident (2 June 2011)

2

43 3

12

2 21

10

1

7

2 21

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20Nu

mbe

r of s

ampl

es

Prefecture / Date of sampling

Food samples above the regulation values between 19 and 31 May 2011

Cs-total

Cs-total & I-131

Page 11: Radiological Monitoring and Consequences of Fukushima Nuclear Accident (2 June 2011)

6

10

1

5

1

16

1

9

2

1

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Chiba / tea Fukushima /Algae

Fukushima /Fishery

products

Fukushima /Fruit

Fukushima /Mushroom

Fukushima /tea

Fukushima /Tree /

perennial plantshoots

Gunma / tea Ibaraki / tea Tochigi / tea

Num

ber o

f sam

ples

Prefecture / food type

Food samples above the regulation values between 19 and 31 May 2011

Cs-total

Cs-total & I-131