36
Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics

Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Real Business Cycles

Supply Side Economics

Page 2: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

The Real Economy

• Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random disturbances to productivity.

Page 3: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

The Real Economy

• Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random disturbances to productivity.

• The initial impact takes place in labor markets (employment/output)

Page 4: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

The Real Economy

• Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random disturbances to productivity.

• The initial impact takes place in labor markets (employment/output)

• Capital markets determine the impact on future labor markets (Investment today affects the capital stock in the future)

Page 5: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Example: A negative supply shock

• Consider an unanticipated rise in oil prices (permanent enough to impact capital investment).

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

0 100 200 300 400 500

Page 6: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Example: A negative supply shock

• Consider an unanticipated rise in oil prices (permanent enough to impact capital investment).

• This drop in productivity lowers labor demand resulting in lower wages, lower employment, and lower output 0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

0 100 200 300 400 500

Page 7: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Example: A negative supply shock

• Now, moving to capital markets, the drop in productivity ( from lower employment as well as high oil prices) lowers investment demand

0

4

8

12

16

20

0 100 200 300 400 500

Page 8: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Example: A negative supply shock

• Now, moving to capital markets, the drop in productivity ( from lower employment as well as high oil prices) lowers investment demand

• Lower investment demand causes interest rates, investment, and savings to fall

0

4

8

12

16

20

0 100 200 300 400 500

Page 9: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Investment and the Capital Stock

• Recall that investment is defined as the purchase of new capital goods.

Page 10: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Investment and the Capital Stock

• Recall that investment is defined as the purchase of new capital goods.

• Capital goods are constantly wearing out (depreciation). Therefore, positive investment is needed to maintain the current capital stock.

Page 11: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Investment and the Capital Stock

• Recall that investment is defined as the purchase of new capital goods.

• Capital goods are constantly wearing out (depreciation). Therefore, positive investment is needed to maintain the current capital stock.

• The capital stock evolves according to

K (Future) = (1-dep)*K + I

Page 12: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Investment and the Capital Stock

• Recall that investment is defined as the purchase of new capital goods.

• Capital goods are constantly wearing out (depreciation). Therefore, positive investment is needed to maintain the current capital stock.

• The capital stock evolves according to

K (Future) = (1-dep)*K + I

• A large enough drop in current investment causes the capital stock to shrink.

Page 13: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Example: A negative supply shock

• With a lower capital stock, labor productivity drops (capital and labor are complements) causing another drop in labor demand

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

0 100 200 300 400 500

Page 14: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Example: A negative supply shock

• With a lower capital stock, labor productivity drops (capital and labor are complements) causing another drop in labor demand

• Therefore, wages, employment, and output continue to fall

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

0 100 200 300 400 500

Page 15: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Example: A negative supply shock

• Lower employment causes another drop in capital investment (not as big as the previous decline – the capital stock is lower than it was before)

0

4

8

12

16

20

0 100 200 300 400 500

Page 16: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Example: A negative supply shock

• Lower employment causes another drop in capital investment (not as big as the previous decline – the capital stock is lower than it was before)

• Interest rates and investment continue to fall

0

4

8

12

16

20

0 100 200 300 400 500

Page 17: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Example: A Negative supply shock

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1

0

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Page 18: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Example: A Negative supply shock

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

0 1st Qtr

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Page 19: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Example: A Negative supply shock

-9

-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

0 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Page 20: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Example: A Negative supply shock

-9

-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

0 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Page 21: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Example: A Negative supply shock

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

0 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Page 22: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Example: A Negative supply shock

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

0 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 5th Qtr

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Page 23: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Example: A Negative supply shock

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

0 1st Qtr 2ndQtr

3rdQtr

4th Qtr 5th Qtr 6th QtrEmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Page 24: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Example: A Negative supply shock

-14-12-10-8-6-4-202468

0 1stQtr

2ndQtr

3rdQtr

4thQtr

5thQtr

6thQtr

7thQtr

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Page 25: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Example: A Negative supply shock

-14-12-10-8-6-4-202468

0 1stQtr

2ndQtr

3rdQtr

4thQtr

5thQtr

6thQtr

7thQtr

8thQtr

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Page 26: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Example: A Negative supply shock

-14-12-10-8-6-4-202468

0 1stQtr

2ndQtr

3rdQtr

4thQtr

5thQtr

6thQtr

7thQtr

8thQtr

9thQtr

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Page 27: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

Example: A negative supply shock

-14-12-10-8-6-4-202468

0 1stQtr

2ndQtr

3rdQtr

4thQtr

5thQtr

6thQtr

7thQtr

8thQtr

9thQtr

10thQtr

EmploymentOutputWagesInvestmentCapital

Page 28: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

The Recession of 2001

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4/1/

99

8/1/

99

12/1

/99

4/1/

00

8/1/

00

12/1

/00

4/1/

01

8/1/

01

12/1

/01

4/1/

02

8/1/

02

12/1

/02

GDPConsumptionProductivity

Page 29: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

The Recession of 2001

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

Jan-

99

May

-99

Sep-

99

Jan-

00

May

-00

Sep-

00

Jan-

01

May

-01

Sep-

01

Jan-

02

May

-02

Sep-

02

Jan-

03

Investment

Page 30: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

The Recession of 2001

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

1/1/

99

5/1/

99

9/1/

99

1/1/

00

5/1/

00

9/1/

00

1/1/

01

5/1/

01

9/1/

01

1/1/

02

5/1/

02

9/1/

02

1/1/

03

5/1/

03

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

EmploymentInterest

Page 31: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

What caused the 2001 recession?

Page 32: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

What caused the current recession?

• Collapse of the stock market• The Dow dropped 30% from its Jan 14, 2000 high of $11,722

• The Nasdaq dropped 75% from its March 10, 2000 high of $5,132

• The S&P 500 dropped 45% from its July 17, 2000 high of $1,517

Page 33: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

What caused the current recession?

• Collapse of the stock market• The Dow dropped 30% from its Jan 14, 2000 high of $11,722

• The Nasdaq dropped 75% from its March 10, 2000 high of $5,132

• The S&P 500 dropped 45% from its July 17, 2000 high of $1,517

• Y2K/Capital Overhang

Page 34: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

What caused the current recession?

• Collapse of the stock market• The Dow dropped 30% from its Jan 14, 2000 high of $11,722

• The Nasdaq dropped 75% from its March 10, 2000 high of $5,132

• The S&P 500 dropped 45% from its July 17, 2000 high of $1,517

• Y2K/Capital Overhang

• A sharp rise in oil prices (oil prices doubled in late 1999)

Page 35: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

What caused the current recession?

• Collapse of the stock market• The Dow dropped 30% from its Jan 14, 2000 high of $11,722

• The Nasdaq dropped 75% from its March 10, 2000 high of $5,132

• The S&P 500 dropped 45% from its July 17, 2000 high of $1,517

• Y2K/Capital Overhang

• A sharp rise in oil prices (oil prices doubled in late 1999)

• Enron/Accounting scandals

Page 36: Real Business Cycles Supply Side Economics. The Real Economy Neoclassical (Supply Side) Economics suggests that business cycles are the result of random

What caused the current recession?

• Collapse of the stock market• The Dow dropped 30% from its Jan 14, 2000 high of $11,722

• The Nasdaq dropped 75% from its March 10, 2000 high of $5,132

• The S&P 500 dropped 45% from its July 17, 2000 high of $1,517

• Y2K/Capital Overhang

• A sharp rise in oil prices (oil prices doubled in late 1999)

• Enron/Accounting scandals

• Terrorism/SARS