Regional Planning

138

S.Rengasamy. Regional Planning & Development. Madurai Institute of Social Sciences

REGIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT-- SYLLABUS

Concept of region-- Functional and formal regions --Techniques of regional delimitation. Classification and hierarchy of regions Regionalization in India) -- Concept of rural- urban continuum.Definition. Scope and content of regional planning-- Regional imbalances and inequalities in India Methods and techniques of regional analysis and development. Export Base Model. Neo-classical Model. Input –output Analysis. Central Place Theory. Growth Pole Hypothesis. Myrdal’s Theory of Cumulative Causation,Directions in regional planning. Town and Country Planning. River Valley Planning. Resource Planning. Multi –level Planning. Need and Methods of Micro-level Planing. Relevance of micro-level planning in community development.Tamilnadu . Planning regions in Tamilnadu. Regional planning in Tamilnadu. Resources of Tamilnadu. Rural and urban development with reference to Tamilnadu.

138


UNIT I - Concept and Meaning of RegionRegion means a tract of land; any area; a portion of earth’s surface.There are two aspects of Region 1) Spatial dimension-objective reality2) Non spatial dimension-subjective idea-mental construct-spaceless

138


Region-area larger than the communityThree locality groups

1. Neighborhood A group of people experiencing social interaction with in a localized area with one or two social institutions as the local point or means by which the area can be identified physically is thus a neighborhood. 2. CommunityCommunity is the first social group in modern life that approaches self sufficiency (a group is self sufficient when it possess most of the (important) major social institutions.3. RegionUse of the concept

1. To divide the space into relatively homogeneous units2. To further our analysis and understanding of specific studies Purpose of the concept1. Delineation of the space into homogenous units 2. To study the human association with in a specific regional environment3. To facilitate comparison

Definition of region is limited by the purposeA large tract of land; a country; a more or less defined portion of earth’s surface, as distinguished by certain natural features, climatic conditions, a special fauna and flora or the like. An area, space, or place of more or less definite extent or character. Any portion of space considered as possessing certain characteristics-Mill An area of earth’s surface differentiated (from adjoining areas) by one or more

features or characteristics which give it a measure of unity, According to the criteria employed in differentiating regions are termed as physiographic regions, political regions and economic regions.

138


An area homogenous with respect to certain announced criteria-James Any portion of earth’s surface where physical conditions are homogeneous can be

considered to be a region in the geographic sense-Joerg A region is a complex of land, water, air, plant, animal and human beings, having

spatial relationship, which constitute a definite portion of earth’s surface-Herbertsor An area with in which historical and environmental factors have combined to create

relatively homogeneous social structure and a conciseness of individually.

Identification of regionsSpecial Regions (each one being unique)Generic Regions (containing a number of similarities)Synthetic Regions (made up of a number of contrasting though related parts)

Homogenous Regions- based on the similarity of one or two or combination of phenomena, alike in all its parts; emphasis similarity-formal regionsNodal Regions-based on the centrality-emphasis interdependence-functional regionsProgramming/ Planning Regions-based on administrative convenience-emphasis uniformity and convenience, Planning and Programming Regions

Homogeneous Regions

Nodal Regions AdministrativeRegions

Formal RegionSingle Factor Region

Heterogeneous Regions Functional Regions

Planning / Programming Regions

Geographical area which is homogeneous in terms selected criteria Geographical criteria (topography, soil, climate)

Functional regions emphasis interdependence. It composed of heterogeneous units such as cities, towns and villages which are functionally inter related

A combination of homogeneity, nodality and administrative convenience

Economic criteria (per capita income, similar production styles, consumption patterns, uniform unemployment

The functional relationship is usually revealed in flows of people, factors, services, commodities and communication

Large enough to make substantial investment decisions, but small enough to comprehend the problem as a whole

Social/ political criteria (party allegiance)

Distribution area of retail and household goods Freight and passenger movementTelephone commun ication densityNews paper circulation areasDomiciliary origin of students in educational institutionsLabor catchment areas

Contiguous areaSocio-cultural homogeneitySpecial data collection unitOne administrative agencyOptimum sizeNarrow disparityConsensus in defining problem and solving itEnable direct peoples participation Should have a growth point

138


Elements of a region1.Relative homogeneity2.Uniqueness, distinctiveness and identification 3.Blurred boundaries

Definitions of region in the Web:

the extended spatial location of something; "the farming regions of France"; "religions in all parts of the world";

area: a part of an animal that has a special function or is supplied by a given artery or nerve; "in the abdominal region"

a large indefinite location on the surface of the Earth; "penguins inhabit the polar regions" domain: a knowledge domain that you are interested in or are communicating about; "it was a

limited domain of discourse"; "here we enter the region of opinion"; "the realm of the occult" wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

In European politics, a region is the layer of government directly below the national level. The term is especially used in relation to those regions which have some historical claim to uniqueness or independence, or differ significantly from the rest of the country. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Region_(EU)

The region (sometimes known as Government Office Region) is currently the highest tier of local government in England. The powers of the regions are very limited and there are no elected regional governments. Historically the primary subdivision of England was into counties,

which still exist in modified form. In addition, many local government functions are the responsibility of boroughs. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Region_(England)

An area having some characteristic or characteristics that distinguish it from other areas. A territory of interest to people and for which one or more distinctive traits are used as the basis for its identity.

www.geographic.org/glossary.html A larger-sized territory that includes many smaller places, all or most of which share similar

attributes, such as climate, landforms, plants, soils, language, religion, economy, government or other natural or cultural attributes.www.nmlites.org/standards/socialstudies/glossary.html

A group of districts, located within a geographic area of a state www.nejaycees.org/about/jargon.asp large and indefinite part of the earthwww.epa.gov/reva/glossary.htm An area of the Earth having a distinctive plant or animal life.biology.usgs.gov/s+t/SNT/noframe/zy198.htm linguistic landscape of a particular region. They show which languages are spoken where,

explain how this particular situation came about historically, and discuss language-political issues relevant in this region.www.routledge-ny.com/ref/linguistics/

A region of the world. For example, North America or Europe.www.summary.net/manual/glossary.html

An area with one or more common characteristics or features, which give it a measure of homogeneity and make it different from surrounding areas.www.pueblo60.k12.co.us/Standard.NSF/0/4e1a7298cefa0ed08725648d0055c0f6

http://www.google.co.in/url?sa=X&start=10&oi=define&q=http://www.geographic.org/glossary.html

http://www.google.co.in/url?sa=X&start=13&oi=define&q=http://www.nmlites.org/standards/socialstudies/glossary.html

138


Types of a regions (Techniques)(Classification)1. By using indicatorsSingle factor regions e.g. Physiographic, Agriculture, EconomicsComposite regions e.g. backward regions 2. Based on relationshipA. Macro e.g. India B. Meso e.g. South India C. Micro e.g. Tamilnadu3. Based on administrative convenienceRegion making forces1. Geographic and physiography 2.History 3.Culture Regional Approach to the study of Rural Populations

Regional Approach to the study of Rural PopulationsStudies of Rural Region (Its origin-contribution of various scholars Especially Margin & Taylor)Rural regions of the United States:Cotton Belt Corn BeltRange livestock region Wheat BeltSpecialty crop region General and self sufficing regionThe Cotton beltHot weather…economic and social activities attuned to the rhythm of cotton cultivation…busy seasons and slack seasons…Hospitality is the by product of slack season…sharply defined class system-conservative and resistance to social change is due to the difficulty of mechanizing cotton crop-illiteracy.The Corn belt:Richest agri regions…deep fertile soils plentiful and dependable rain fall… farmers are ambitious to get ahead…democratic atmosphere…prestige attaches to successful farming rather than land ownership-believes and use latest technological methods…consider himself as a superior one…hard workers, good managers, intelligent and moral persons…relatively high level of formal education…frequent contacts with industry.The range live stock region:Rugged topography…sparsely settled areas…cultural complexity…reverence for good horse man ship and distinctive cowboy boots…schools and churches are small…lesser number of central places-sentimental attachment to the wide open spaces-The Wheat region:Low density population…mechanization of agriculture…work load is heavy during the short seeding and harvesting periods…small numbers of rural schools…children are put up in boarding schools…cohesive neighborhood… opposed market forces which operated to their disadvantages…believes in that success depends upon one selfThe Diary region:Close to large population centers…twice a day milking…because of this meetings have to be organized during the middle of the day…arduousness of his tasks made him to practice scientific and mechanized farming…level of living is relatively high…steady income…stability in school and church attendance-encouragement to co-operative approach.The western specialty crop region:Productivity depend upon the control of water by human effort…commercialization and mechanization of the agriculture…uncertainty in farming is absent…perishability of the crops…co-op system has emerged… materialistic philosophy of the region is the out come of speculation.The general and self sufficing region:Relatively little commercial production…isolation of the area is a detriment to commercialization …family ties are very strong…attachment to home and localityUtility of the rural social areas;Effective dissemination of informationOvercoming the limitations

138


UNIT I - CONCEPT OF REGION, REGIONALIZATION Factors that Promoted Regional Studies

Region & Regionalization: Uncertainty of Definitions and Evolution of Ideas

After World War II, the interest towards regional studies has greatly increased all over the world in connection with the tasks of planning. Such studies are being undertaken by representatives of not only geography, but also of other sciences, primarily economics and community organization. Concepts of Regionalization have also been evolved.

The absence of a generally accepted interpretation of the basic notion of region is a major terminological difficulty. A wide use of this term in every day life-by politicians, journalists and in private life-makes the picture still more complicated.

‘The use of one and the same technical term in different senses is inconvenient, but in no science can it be altogether avoided. The “merits” of academicians themselves in confusing the matter are also great. In the 1930s the American geographer, H.T Odum and H.E.Moore gave 41 (sic) different definitions of region. Early in the 1950s another geographer, George Kimble described his colleagues dealing with regionalization as people “trying to put boundaries that do not exists around areas that do not matter”.Stressing the difference between the generally used, non-committal word “region” and the geographic terminological concept, James writes. “Earth space can be indefinitely subdivided into segments of various sizes. When such a segment of earth space is set off by boundaries it is known as an area. Here it is necessary to distinguish between areas that are arbitrarily separated segments of earth space and a special kind of area known as a region.

A region is identified by specified criteria, and its boundaries are determined by these criteria. This is a rather general and vague definition of region, which hides quite different interpretations of its essence, including, the basic one: is region just an intellectual category or is it an objectively existing reality reflected in our minds?

“Any segment or portion of the earth surface is a region if it is homogeneous in terms of such an areal grouping. Its homogeneity is determined by criteria formulated for the purpose of sorting from the whole range of earth phenomena, the items required to express or illuminate a particular grouping, areally cohesive. So defined a region is not an object, either self-determined or nature given. It is an intellectual concept, an entity for the purpose of thought created by the selection of certain features that are relevant to an areal interest or problem and by the disregard of all features that are considered to be irrelevant.”

138


Acceptance of the region as an objective reality has been increasingly criticized by geographers, and is flatly rejected by several academicians.

In the post-war period, when regional planning acquired importance in capitalist countries and became widely spread in developing ones (in socialist countries regional planning is the law of social development) concepts of regional development began to be particularly actively elaborated and the interest in regionalization was revived.

International Geographical Conference distinguished principal categories of regions delineated on the basis of different purposes.1. Regions- areal units, including statistical areas (the basic tool for research)2. Regions-tools for action (organizational, e.g. administrative or planning regions)3. Regions- the goal and results of research i.e. objectively really existing regions which

should be studied and delineated.

This simple and clear classification, uniting diverse, usages, interpretations and readings of the concept of “region”, is undoubtedly an achievement of the IGU commission. Summarizing the result of the commission’s work, its Chairman, prominent Polish Geographer Kazimiers Dziewonski stressed that the question of an objective existence of regions remained disputable. He wrote: “for some affirmation of their existence becomes a point of honor, for others it is a point of deep skepticism (it is very difficult to identify them), or even of complete agnosticism (it is impossible to find them). Even though region is an elusive concept, it is used as a base to build geographic ideas/theories

Even though there is a lot of research is conducted on regionalization, new entrants to the field seem to ignore the earlier work and proceed in their own way.

One often comes across the situation when representatives of economic, social and other sciences related to geography get to the study of regional development problems and of regionalization, not taking trouble to know the already, found solutions.

Some claim that there is no particular mystique about identifying them and working with them as units of analysis. There are ordinary, common practical geographic areas of which social and economic improvement programs have been conceived, planned and under region. ‘River basins, agricultural zones trade zones, metropolitan regions, and areas of ethnic and cultural communities, areas inhabited by tribes, autonomous administrative territorial units etc. all these are given as examples of regions. There are two essentials stand out in the criteria of the region’s delineation; 1) an awareness of regional problems and opportunities, 2) and an anticipated capacity to do something about them through planning and development activities.”

Types of RegionsThe following categories of regions are listed:“Single purpose” or “limited purpose”“Single purpose” or “limited purpose” regions are defined as areas of an intensive development of a specific natural resource-a river basin used mainly for the purpose of irrigation is given as the most typical example of such regions. e.g.Vaigai-Periyar Command Area

138


2. Frontier Regions Frontier regions-usually sparsely populated areas having rich natural resources. An intensive explosion of these resources, creation of heavy industries and new towns are characteristic of the development of such regions (for instance, Guyana in South America, Aswan in Egypt. Etc). North-eastern Frontier Region. Arunachal Pradesh

3. Depressed Regions Depressed regions -‘Problems areas” distinguished by much lower living standards than the country as a whole (North Eastern Brazil, South Italy, Comilla in Bangladesh).BIMARU States in India

4.Metropolitan regions Metropolitan regions and their hinterland (the Capital City Region-New Delhi).

5.Economic regions Economic regions or administrative-territorial units established under a nationwide planning of regionalization. Export zonesTo conclude there is no universally acceptable methods of regionalization

Reasons for the popularity of the regional conceptFour reasonsLavrov and Galina Sdasyuk assigned several reasons for the growth and popularity of the concepts related to regions i.e. regional studies/ regional planning/ regional development.

1. The failure of the socio-economic development and the realization about the necessity to change priorities and the look for compromises led to a new thinking i.e. Growth and Equal Conditions of Life (or qualitative growth).This new thinking emphasized …

--Provision of equal living conditions in different regions including employment, housing and social security--Guaranteeing an appropriate infrastructure equally distributed and brought close to residential areas

2. The concept of ‘Spatial Social Justice’ (D. Harvey) led to a new thinking on social and economic equality. This resulted in “Core-Periphery concept” (core areas-advanced industrialized nations, industrially developed areas, big cities-peripheral areas –backward areas, villages etc)

3. New emphasis on the quality of life or social developmentThe term “quality of life” began to be widely spread in the west in the 1970s. Destabilization of social conditions and primarily sprawling unemployment, inflation and stagnation of the economy, as well as deterioration of the environment and the growing concern of the broad public, determined the need for politicians and specialists in the field of planning to try to tie up the programs of development (including regional ones) with the concept of quality of life.

This term is very ambiguous and vague. It means “both peoples living conditions and the goals of urban and regional planning.” But among many utilized indices, a common

138


denominator can be discerned, namely, “accessibility of its inhabitants to employment alternatives, educational and medical facilities, essential public social services, a representative range of commercial and culture service and ‘nature’, or extensive recreational open spaces”.

On the whole, the quality of life concept includes a set of material, economic, social and ecological conditions of life, which is considered to be indispensable, proceeding from the ideas common for the given society and region about what is needed for a full and happy life. These ideals are quite different in socialists, advance capitalist, and former colonial and dependent countries. The greatest contrasts in the ideas about the necessary things and still more important, in the real needs are found between the rich and the poor, between those living in advanced capitalist an in developing countries.

4. Emergence of the new concepts like ‘development from below’/ “agripolitan development’ as an antidote for polarized development. this was the outcome of the growing recognition of the growing discontent on the part of sub-national social groups (including local and regional ones) i.e. mass living in periphery, feeling powerlessness and defenseless to shape their own destiny against the ‘omnipotent’ core

Since the mid 1970s development from above is more and more often characterized as dogmatic, alienating, anti-human, irrational, senseless, destructive etc. To counter balance it, a concept of ‘development from below’ is put forwarded in Eric Trist’s book ‘New Directions of Hope: Recent Innovations, Interconnecting Organizational, Industrial, Community and Personal development’

Eric Trist presents the experience of four local “societies of innovation” found in economically deprived regions of advanced capitalist countries and striving on the basis of local initiative to break away from the closed circle of a depressive state. These are (1) The Jamestown Area Labor-Management Committee in the West of the New York State of the USA functioning since 1972; (2) The Greater Philadelphia Partnership functioning since 1978 (Southeast of Pennsylvania, USA); (3). The Society of Sudbury 2001 (Northern Ontario, Canada); (4). The Craigmillar Festival Society (Edinburgh, Scotland, Great Britain), functioning since 1963.

With all the difference, these organizations have the following characteristics in common:(a). They are set up in a critical situation when it

becomes evident that “the crisis is chronic and requires long-range remedies”;

138


(b).The problem to be met is not merely local but is rather a microcosm of major societal problem, so, locally taken actions, if they are effective, “soon begin resonate widely through the social fabric” of the country.

(c) At the same time this “meta-problem” is strictly local and to be solved, requires profound and diverse knowledge and work both under current conditions and from the point of view of a long-term perspective etc.

Many things become clearer if concrete examples are taken. Let us consider in greater detail on of the four examples given by the author- the Craigmillar Festival Society, which is one of the oldest (functions since 1963) original and most effective societies of this kind.

Craigmillar is a small town (25,000 residents) near Edinburgh, which failed to make use of the successes of development in the 1950s and 1960s but which acutely felt the crisis of the 1970s. The level of unemployment among the grown-up population is between 22 and 30% there, while it is still higher among the females. The gap between the level of development of this town and that of the growing centers increasingly deepens. The activity of the local society began with the organization of local arts festivals, which began to be held as an antipode to international festivals in Edinburgh. The success of the local festivals inspired the town residents, according to the author, it allowed to overcome the inferiority complex, which they had developed. In the process of the organization of these festivals the Society itself became “an all-round community development organization”. In 1978 they brought forward “The Craigmillar Comprehensive Plan for Action” which covers all aspects of community life and must now be negotiated with the various authorities concerned”.

Besides the organization of festivals, the society secured the foundation of a high school and a community centre. An important side to the activity of the Society is organization of social self-service by local forces. Hospitalization of elders in this town became less expensive than in other similar centers, more children began to attend schools. The author pays special attention to the activity of the Employment Working Party organized here, and also expressed hope that the society will be able “ to create more industry in Craigmillar and fill the Industrial Park the Society has acquired”. They also make attempts at providing such conditions that unemployed would be able to be trained professionally and to find the application of their skill in the “Market economy”. The activities to the Society in Craigmillar culminated in the securing of a grant from the regional development fund of the common market. One can hardly build the concept of a cardinal renovation “from below”as in Craigmillar.

The experience of local societies is raised up to the highest level of generalization and is announced to be a panacea against many troubles.

Trist compares the main features of the modern social systems of western society with those, which in his opinion emerge in the process of the local innovation societies, believing that they will “become one force which will help push Western society towards a new paradigm”.

The above said is summed up in a table:Basic features

138

Synopsis Definition Classification Regional EconomicsMulti-level planning Stages-of-developmentActivity status analysis Popular Region TypesHomogenousHeterogeneous (Nodal/Functional)PlanningTypes of Regions – Multi-Level Planning PerspectiveMacro RegionsMeso RegionsMicro RegionsMicro – Minor RegionTypes of Regions on the basis of stages of economic developmentDeveloped / Development RegionsBackward RegionsNeutral Regions/ Intermediate regionsTypes of Regions based on the activity status analysisMineral regions Manufacturing Regions and Congested RegionsCultural RegionsRegionalization


Present EmergingPolicies Centrally formedStatutory bodies allocate ResourcesParty politicsPassive electorateOrganizationsTechnocratic bureaucraciesExternal controls low q. of life for the manyDomainsDiscreet problem solvingIndependent objectivesCompeting interestsIndividualsPrivatizeddissociatedPowerless though autonomous

An innovative peripheryPower is share with Non-statutory bodiesCommunity politicsActive participation

Democratized organization formsInternal controlsHigh quality of life for the many

Meta-problem appreciation Interdependent objectivesCollaborating interests

Shared values Network conceitednessEmpowered, socially responsible

UNIT I - REGIONS AND THEIR TYPES

A region is a sub-system within a system (the country itself) and if sub-systems develop greater inter-connectivity, the greater will be the efficiency of the system. All regions are ‘problem regions’ in one way or the other, level of development notwithstanding. A structural set of different types of regions has its own ‘dualism’ everywhere. The essential task of planning is to bind various regions into a system in which only those inequalities remain in which simply cannot be obliterated.

138


A) Regional Economics perspective.1. Homogeneous Regions of various hues. Formal regions.2. Nodal, polarized, heterogeneous, or functional regions.3. Planning and Programming Regions. B) Multi-level planner’s perspective.1.Macro region2.State region/ Micro region4. Micro regionC) ‘Stages-of-development’ perspective.1. Developed Region 2. Backward and Depressed Region (Vestigial regions also)3. Neutral and Intermediate Regions.D Activity status analysis perspective.1. Mineral regions2. Manufacturing regions3. Urban and or Congested regions

Maps showing Regions Based on Development Index

Regions have been delimited on several criteria: economic, administrative, physical or activity regions. Geographers, economists and administrators invariably delimit the regions in different manner.

Regionalizing India based on Human Index

138


Harry W.Richardson Observation.“Defining regions precisely is such a nightmare that most regional economists prefer to shy away from the task, and are relieved when they work with administrative regions on the grounds that policy considerations require it or that data are not available for any other spatial units.”

Too small sub-regions are less significant for comprehensive planning. In the words of Carter:

“Countries differ enormously both in size and in the variety of localized economic communities that they contain, but in most of them there is some sort of awareness of a small number usually form two to a dozen-spatially distinguishable division, different in economic aspects that bear upon national policy. Beyond them there lie and indefinite number of smaller divisions, sometimes with very clear differences of welfare and interest separate towns and rural districts, working –class and middle-class suburbs, manufacturing- which exclude from the discussion for a variety of reasons.”

“There has been a great deal of discussion of the regional concept, but this has not led to any firm agreement. Probably the most prevalent view is that there is no unambiguous method of defining an ideal region and that wherever possible spatial analysts should work with the more neutral concept of space. It is clear that a region is a supra urban on the one hand, and a sub-area of the nation on the other. A common procedure is to delimit the region by reference to physical criteria, administrative boundaries or data availability. Certainly, most researchers accept that it is easier to define the core of a region (usually a central city) than to map its outer boundary.”(Richardson)

North defined that a region should be defined in terms of its export base.

Many writers belonging to disciplines other than economics were more inclined to define region as a homogeneous geographical region, even when they accepted such concepts as ‘export base!

Popular Region Types(Homogenous/ Heterogeneous (Nodal/Functional)/ Planning)

1 Homogenous Region They are formal regions and if the basis of homogeneity is topography, rainfall, climate or other geo-physical characteristic, they are geographer’s darlings.

Economic homogeneity is more relevant for planning. The structure of employment, the occupational pattern, the net migration, the density of population, the resource and industrial structure, if similar in a space, the regions become homogeneous in economic sense. The greater the economic similarities, the greater the interest the economists will have in homogeneous regions. Internal

138


differences in a region are unimportant. Sometimes, however, a clear-cut homogeneous region may have, as many differences in sub-regions as to make them quite different yet a region may remain ‘homogeneous’. Scotland or Uttar Pradesh are clear-cut homogeneous regions but in topography the hilly districts of Uttar Pradesh have nothing in common with the districts of the plains. Eastern and Western districts are also different but Uttar Pradesh remains a homogeneous region in administrative terms. Thus, a homogeneous economic region can have differing physical characteristics. Homogeneous region on economic or political criterion may have a lot of heterogeneity from several other standpoints.

A region being a collectivity of people is a sociological phenomenon and thus a region goes parallel to the concept of community also. A homogeneous region is therefore a homogeneous problem-bound entity.

2. Polarized / Nodal / Heterogeneous /Functional RegionsPolarized or nodal regions look to a centre-a large town usually-for service. Its influence extends beyond the area of the city. The villages are dependent upon it for services and marketing. There is little concern for uniformity when a polarized or nodal region is taken. Cohesiveness is due to internal flows, contacts and interdependencies. The city region need not correspond to the administrative region because hinterland of several clear-cut regions may be served by a city. (For example even the persons of Gwalior may visit Delhi for buying some consumer durables of high value. A capital city may attract customers form several districts around the capital city.)

A nodal region will have heterogeneous economy around it. Regional economists are more concerned with what happens within a nodal region and spatial dimension of the nodal region assumes importance. Population and industries agglomerate and there are core regions with higher per capita income generation through higher production of goods and services. Within regions there are dominant cities or nodes to which flows of inputs, goods, people and traffic gravitate. Within the cities there are nuclei that form business and social centers and which are discernible at a glance from an intra-metropolitan traffic-flow density map. (Richardson). If the ‘size of the mass’ of the nodes is large, then there will be great pull effects of the centre. However, as the distance increases, the costs of overcoming frictions will rise and the people of different areas will look for a different nodal point. Each region will have one or more dominant nodes and it will be interesting to find and record as to which interior areas form the areas of influence of one or the other node.

Nodal regions provide an understanding of the functional relationship between settlements, which fill up the space. Big, medium, small and tiny settlements dot the space and because of their intra-regional differentiation, flows emanate. These heterogeneous units in rural and urban areas are functionally related because each settlement cannot have all the functions and facilities.

All functions require a particular threshold population and other facilities (each settlement cannot have a college; or, unless there is electricity there cannot be cinema hall; or a bank branch will require not only critical minimum deposit-credit ratio). The size of the settlement and the hierarchy of functions are mutually determining. Lower and higher order functions can naturally be found in the same order hierarchy of the

138


settlements. Thus between hamlets and metropolitan cities there are lower and higher order functions in all types of services (from one-man post office to head post office; from primary school to Institutions of higher learning and so on). Since not all settlements can afford to sustain all types of functions, they depend upon other settlements / areas for meeting their needs of services and goods and thus functional linkages develop. Markets of various orders exist. Nothing can be bought unless something is sold and thus all exchanges are ultimately barter, unless supported by grants, donations and subsidies. Functional; linkages are revealed by the flows of men, materials and money. Such linkages result in the emergence of the dominant nodes-focal points, which attract and provide all types of flows. In a hierarchy of settlement we find several nodal points which receive and provide flows and functions. Each node has some settlements to support and receive and provide flows and functions. Each node has some settlements to support and receive sustenance e.g., a city receives its food items from the villages; while the villages receive goods of the secondary sector from the urban nodes. (Nodal points are always urban centers). Thus a nodal region is composed of heterogeneous units which are closely inter related with each other functionally. Functional linkages give unity to nodal region and a certain amount of functional coherence/utility/ interdependence is always present.

Nodes attract labor while the hinterland becomes the labor catchment area if the hinterland cannot provide jobs to the people. In some respects the boundary of a nodal region may extend far and beyond for some facility e.g. Bombay attracts persons from distant places in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar because the persons can find employment in Bombay. Similarly even the rural areas of Punjab attract labor from Chhatisgarh region of Madhya Pradesh or from Eastern Uttar Pradesh or Bihar because highly paying (comparatively speaking) employment can be found in Punjab during agricultural operations.

All functional linkages keep in changing in nature and volume. While economic activities are scattered in a homogeneous region, they are concentrated in or around specific foci of activities. Inter dependence is a rule in heterogeneous region and thus nodal region is Heterogeneous region. The demand and supply conditions at different points / settlement in the heterogeneous region differ and that is the reason for interdependence. Around a node (a focal point in space) revolve not only economic but political and cultural activities also. Yet, it can be said that all activities become weak with the distance and ultimately terminate also. The forces of distance weaken the linkages of all types, unless it is the linkage of all areas of the country with capital of the nation. The size of a nodal region shall depend upon the efficiency of means of communications and transportation and all those facilities, which give rise to localization of industries/activities at a certain place. An improvement in transportation, communications finance, accommodation, and other facilities will widen the radius of influence and the hinterland will get enlarged and the node will get further strengthened.

In a sense there is an element of homogeneity in a nodal region! A nodal region is homogeneous in that it combines areas dependent in some trade of functional sense on a specific centre (Meyers). There are a number of possible sets of nodal regions depending on the level of activity one is specifying. (Smaller node for vegetables: bigger node for (automobiles).

138


All nodes have their own periphery but different nodes have interdependence with other nodes outside their region.

3. Formal Regions and Functional Region.A formal region is homogeneous with reference to some geo-physical characteristic such as topography, climate of vegetation. This is physical formal region.

Later on there was a shift from this narrow approach to a broader approach and economic, social and political criteria were also applied. An industrial or agricultural or plantation region is a formal economic region; or a state governed by a particular party is a formal political region.

As against this, the functional region is concerned with interdependence. This is a geographical area in which there is economic interdependence. The nodal regions are functional regions between which there are flows of men, material and money.

In practice, the formal and functional regions very rarely overlap neatly, and often vary markedly. We have to “carve out” a planning region after compromising the two approaches. That region becomes the planning region (formal or functional) which is administratively viable. All regions are geographical regions because they exist on space and all regions are economic regions because people cannot remain alive without being economically active.

4. Functional Regions & Flow AnalysisThis is relevant for nodal regions with considerable degree of inter-dependence. The actual flows of men, money, and materials can be studied (flow analysis) and / or simulation may be made as to how they would flow (gravity model). Functional regions can be delineated on the basis of the direction and intensity of flows between the dominant centre and the surrounding satellites. Each flow will show (a) decreasing intensity as it becomes more distant from the main centre and (b) increasing intensity as it approaches another centre. If a small town “A” is 100 km. from Delhi but just 10 km. from another city, then flows to Delhi will be weaker, unless those flows can be exclusively to and from Delhi. Thus the boundary of the sphere of influence of the dominant centre will be where the flow of intensity becomes minimum.

Export and import of goods, transfer of money, migration of persons in search of jobs etc. are all ‘flows’. Students going to colleges in big cities or to specialized hospitals or girls going to the place of their husbands are “Social Flows”. People going to pilgrimage are cultural flows, also involving economic flows as the people spend money on the way. Information flows (Newspapers) also involve monetary transactions.

5. Planning RegionsPlanning regions depend upon the type of multi-level planning in the country. A very small country will naturally have one level planning. Markedly different geo-physical or agro-climate areas may be chosen as planning region for special cases e.g., developing a mining or plantation or power grid region. A planning region in a multi-level setup requires regional plan, which is a spatial plan for the systematic location of functions and facilities in relation to human settlements so that people may use them to their maximum advantages. Infact more important than reducing the regional disparities is the task of

138


ensuring that backward region and rural areas have basic minimum needs. Planning region for different activities can be different and a regional plan will be locational in character for that activity/function. For comprehensive planning, there has to be a national plan and then a state plan and finally district/block plans. Since a planning region is a sub-national area demarcated for the purpose of translating national objectives into regional programs and policies, and since plan formulation and implementation need administrative machinery, administrative regions are generally accepted as planning regions. This may not be wholly correct, as administrative boundaries may be inconsistent with regional boundaries, derived from economic criteria. However, in some cases a planning region can be small, say a city but a village cannot be (and, probably not even a cluster of villages) a planning region unless the objective is too limited.

The hierarchy of planning region would be (I) national level (ii) macro level (iii) state level (iv) meso level (v) and micro level.

A planning region is (or should be) large enough to enable substantial changes in the distribution of population and employment to take place within its boundaries, yet small enough for its planning problems to be tackled effectively. It should have a viable resource base, a manpower base, and internal homogeneity/cohesiveness. It should be such that satisfactory levels of mutually satisfying levels of production, exchange, and consumption levels obtained.

Boudeville definition of planning region “It is an area displaying some coherence or unit of economic decisions”.

Klassen definition of planning region A planning region must be large enough to take investment decisions of an economic size, must be able to apply its own industry with the necessary labor, should have a homogeneous economic structure, contain at least one growth point and have a common approach to and awareness of its problems. In short, a planning region should be defined according to the purpose of one’s analysis.

Ideally a planning region should have adequate resources to establish a satisfactory pattern of savings, capital formation, investment, production, employment, income generation and consumption pattern. It means that the area should be economically viable. This usually is not the case. The States of East India are rich in natural resources and logistics/infrastructure support. Unless the aid comes from the centre, these states cannot be viable states as planning regions. As the things stand at present, these states are not capable of being self-sufficient at higher levels of economic activity and are not able even to grow at a reasonable growth rate of income, comparable to some of the developed states of the country. Thus planning regions are spatial units of different sizes, (city, block, district or state) depending upon the objectives in view and the problems to be tackled. In rare cases only, a planning region extends beyond a state.

UNIT I - TYPES OF REGIONS – MULTI-LEVEL PLANNING PERSPECTIVE

Macro RegionsMacro region is naturally bigger. Macro region can be a state of even a group of states, if the states of a country are not big enough. A Macro-major region can be a zone in a

138


country, which may comprise of a few States. For example, in India there are East, West, North, South and Central Zones and ‘Zonal Councils’ of which function is mutual consultation, developing cooperation and mutual counseling.

In a sense macro regions are second in hierarchy, next to the national level. It is also possible that a physical macro region may comprise parts of different states of a country for project planning purposes. (e.g., big river valley projects, an electric grid of different states, and, for the purpose of a particular activity (facility) planning) the macro region will be parts of different states. State boundaries are not respected in the sense that the macro region may transcend or cut-across administrative boundaries of the states of a country. A macro region may not be uniform or homogeneous in all respects. It may have homogeneity in one respect (physical complimentarity) and may have heterogeneity in other respect (administrative boundaries). A macro region should have a common resource base and specialization in that resource base, so that production activities can develop on the principle of comparative advantage based on territorial division of labor. (India has been divided into 11 to 20 macro regions-agro-climate or resource regions). The planning Commission of India would have just 5 zonal councils-Eastern, Northern, Central, Western and Southern comprising of certain states but beyond this there is no macro-regionalization in India.

These so-called macro regions of India have to have interstate cooperation in the matter of utilization of river water and electricity grids etc.

Meso RegionsMeso region can be identified with a ‘division’ of a state. Chattisgarh Region, Bundelkhand Region, Baghelkahand Region, Mahakoshal region is usually a sub-division of a state, comprising of several districts. There should be some identifiable affinity in the area which may even facilitate planning. It can be cultural or administrative region and it will be even better if it is a homogeneous physical region (resource) region. A meso region can also become a nodal region provided the combined micro regions or parts thereof can be developed in a complementary manner. (NSS of India has identified 58 meso regions of India but they are not shown on maps as planning regions).

Micro RegionsIn multi-level planning, district is the micro region. It becomes the lowest territorial unit of planning in the hierarchy of planning regions. The most important reason why district is the most viable micro region for planning is the existence of database and compact administration. This is the area, which is viable for plan formulation with administration for plan implementation and monitoring.

A metropolitan area can be one micro region and the area of influence can be another micro region. A nodal point is also a micro region, though in many cases micro regions are basically rural areas, which may have a number of minor nodes without any organizational hierarchy influencing the entire area. The basic characteristic of a micro region is its smallness. There can be some specific micro regions such as belts of extraction of mineral or a reclaimed area, or a not-so-big command area of an irrigational project.

138


Micro – Minor Region:This is the region which is associated with, what is called, the grass-root planning. A micro-minor region can be a block for which also data exists now and for which there may be a plan. (So far as the quality of data is concerned, there is hardly any activity, or sector, or region or field for which data is not cooked by the vested interest groups: but, that is another story).

The block level plan is integrated with the national plan, through the district and state level plans. A block level plan is not surgically cut portion of the district plan, which has its own logic and linkage.

At block level, most of the officers will be more concerned with the implementation of the plans than formulating the plans. At block level, the main exercise will be to take into account of the physical and human resources and to find out the prime moving activities which will enable the block people to make best use of the development potential of the block to meet the basic needs of the people.

Minimum needs can be satisfied with the production of basic goods with the help of low entropy local resources. Yet it cannot be said that ‘external help’ will not be necessary. Infrastructure support has to come from the developed regions. In fact, planning of the development of the transport, communication, banking, education, medical and many service facilities has got to be done at the national level.

At the panchayat level, basic goods and services can be arranged through the efforts of the local people. Many activities can be so planned that they improve the socio-economic conditions of the people without being the part of the national plan. Several activities can be undertaken with the cooperation of the local people, with minimum of financial and real resource support from outside e.g., development of dairying, animal husbandry, pisciculture, poultry, soil conservation measures, optimization of the cropping pattern, production of inputs locally, improving the storage and transport facilities can be done at the micro minor level. Many agro-based industries and tiny sector guild-type activities can be developed at the micro-minor level. A good planning can secure ‘ruralization of the industries’ instead of ‘industrialization of rural area’. This will involve production of goods ‘by the masses for the masses and near the masses’.

The most important test of micro-minor planning is that the people need not look towards the centre for it. Now a day a lot of importance is given to ‘water harvesting’. Water is proxy for the use of modern inputs in agriculture. Much of the run-off water goes waste and the infiltration rate is also low. If this water can be harvested, not only the run-off water can be stored, but sub-soil water reserves can also become rich. Micro-minor watershed development program probably will be the most important Program for a country like India. The optimum land use planning can start from the micro-minor area only.

TYPES OF REGIONS ON THE BASIS OF STAGES OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Developed / Development RegionsDeveloped regions are naturally those which are having a high rate of accretion in goods and services i.e., their share in the GDP of the country is relatively higher. This may be

138


with or without rich natural resources by most certainly because of the use of upgraded technology by highly skilled and motivated persons. The locus of infrastructure facilities in abundance will put a region in the state of “nothing succeeds like success” and the region may continue to forge ahead of the backward regions at a higher rate.

A developed region may become ‘overdeveloped’ in certain respects e.g., it may suffer from the diseconomies of congestion and the Perroux’s ‘growth pole’ becomes over-critical here. Infrastructure costs become very high and people can go into the jitters due to pollution and stresses of various types.

A developed region is the counterpart of the backward region: the ‘positive’ side is emphasized in case of the developed region while ‘negative’ aspects are emphasized in case of the backward region. A developed region is one, which has exploited its potentialities fully, which has removed the bottlenecks and speed breakers of development. Developed regions emerge of their own because of the comparative advantage or may emerge as a result of the diversion of funds by the government. In many cases imbalances emerge between developed and backward regions and these imbalances can be the creation of planners also. Many times disproportionately high amounts of investment are made in the constituencies of the influential politicians and some regions become far more developed than the neighboring regions. In a resource short economy such a development may be at the cost of denying legitimate share of investment to some other regions. Those regions where quick maximization is possible i.e., high outputs are obtained with relatively lower levels of inputs, get further attention and become even more developed.

Backward RegionsThere can be ‘backward or depressed’ regions in the developing as well as the developed economies. Backward economies are thoroughly depressed regions.

Regions, in which the economy is largely subsistence one, have in the most co-existed with the modern sector regions since long. There is development even in these regions but these regions have not come out of the low level equilibrium trap. There can be region, which may not be at subsistence level but may be relatively backward. Lack of infrastructure facilities, adverse geo-climate conditions, low investment rate, high rare of growth of population, and low levels of urbanization and industrialization are causes and consequences of backwardness. In less developed countries, even the most ancient occupation (agriculture) is backward and unless it is made progressive with massive real and financial input support, the region cannot come out of backwardness. It will be imperative that for the overall development of the backward regions, those industries should be developed on priority basis which supply vital inputs to agriculture as also those industries which take outputs of agriculture as their inputs. Thus, depressed regions can be very poor under-developed regions, which failed to modernize.

Some vestigial regions (as the regions inhabited by the red Indians in USA/ or tribals in India) can remain backward and may even remain near the subsistence level. The inhibitions may have ancient traditions and may be smug in their surroundings, but the per capita income may be much lower than in the neighboring regions. A region can be backward because of the high population density or even without it. If we take some selected indicators of development (e.g. road length per sq.km, literacy rate, beds per

138


thousand population, percentage of villages electrified, percentage of cultivated land under irrigation, longevity, and availability of low, intermediate and high order functions and facilities) a low total will suggest backwardness.

Depressed regions have rudimentary type of industrial activity; major centers of industrial and economic activities are not in the region and/or are at a distance from the region. Compared to the developed regions, wide chasms exist in most of the economic activities leading to wide differentials in the per capita income and intensity of productive and well paying employment.

Neutral Regions/ Intermediate regionsNew towns and satellite belts are designated as ‘neutral’ regions and they promise good prospects of further development because here further employment generation and income propagation is possible without congestion. Such regions can be demarcated around urban centers.

Intermediate regions are those regions, which are ‘islands of development around a sea of stagnation’. Some metropolitan regions are surrounded by areas of utter penury. It should be the task of the planners to develop linkage activities that the hinterland of such intermediate regions also develops.

Types of Regions based on the activity status analysis

Mineral regions Many mineral regions promise high growth rates for the region as well as for the prosperity of the country, unless the region suffers from ‘Bihar Syndrome’. If mineral-based industries can be developed in the region itself, then industrial development will be less costly because much of the load shedding will be done in the region at low cost. The iron ore deposits of Bailadeela (Bastar District of Madhya Pradesh) are exported abroad: if, however, a plant could be established near the ore deposits, it would have brought tremendous development for the region.

As the mines continue to yield sufficient minerals and the costs are also not prohibitive, not only the mineral-producing region develops but it helps other regions also to develop. After the minerals exhaust, the region will bear degraded look; people will move away to other areas and the erstwhile area will bear a deserted look. Germany took great pains to rehabilitate such areas and vast pits and trenches were suitably reclaimed for various purposes like water storage, eco-forestry and even cultivation after enriching the soil. If new deposits of minerals cannot be discovered, there can be several ways of reclaiming wasteland and developing non-mineral based activities. Regional planning will require a long-term plan for developing such regions after extraction is no longer a profitable activity. The Middle East countries have made adequate planning to diversify their economies so that after the oil wealth exhausts their economies do not relapse to backwardness.

Manufacturing Regions and Congested RegionsSome regions become big manufacturing regions not because they have natural resources but because of the infrastructure development, momentum of an early start, continued government support etc. Autonomous, imitative, supplementary, complementary,

138


induced and speculative investments keep in giving strength to the manufacturing regions. It would be prudent not to develop narrow manufacturing base, otherwise territorial specialization can become a problem if the crop supplying the raw materials fails or if the minerals which are base for the industries, exhaust. In such regions the internal and external economies are available in ever-greater measure and such regions keep on developing. When all the thresholds are crossed, such regions become too congested and the diseconomies overwhelm the economies of production - High density, increasing pollution, reduction in the quality of life result.

Cultural Regions.A cultural region can also be quite well demarcated. (French Canada and English Canada are such regions). In India various states are demarcated on the basis of language and culture primarily. There are affinities of cultural origin in such region. A rich cultured region should be rich in economic terms also.

RegionalizationRegionalization is the process of delineating regions, but each time depending upon the purpose for which the region is to be delineated. If the intention is to develop an arid region, the ‘region’ will be differently defined, including only arid areas. If the congestion is to be removed then the most congested and polluted areas will be included in the ‘congested region’. If the intention is substantially reduce poverty and unemployment, then a ‘depressed region’ is to be delineated. The homogeneity of a region will differ with the purpose for which delineation is being made.

According to Groenman, “Regionalization deals with the differentiation of political measures in space”. If the physical region, having homogeneity, is an administrative region also, then all tasks of regional and national planning can be facilitated.

Geographers were always interested in the process of regionalization and were very fond of pictorial characterization rather than scientific explanation. (Pokshishevskly). Geographers believed that there is some sort of determinism in economic development. USSR geographers even coined the word fortunatov for a region well endowed with resources.

They probably meant that what is physically impossible, money cannot make it possible. However, ‘deterministic’ situations are not too many and the man and his brain-child-technology –can bring a lot of changes. The neo-determinism underlies the fact that as the techno-economic conditions change, the ‘degree determinism’ also undergoes a change to be near the reality, we need adjustments by stages. Infact both ‘determinism’ and possibilism’ are facts of life.

UNIT I - TECHNIQUES OF REGION DELIMITATIONDelineation of Regions /Identification / Classification of Regions

Identification of formal regions:Formal regions are localities possessing homogeneity. The criteria, which we use, may relate to Geography – soil, rainfall, climate Economic – per capita income, no. of industries

138


Socio-cultural – language, political affiliation etcProblems arise when we use multiple criteria. When we are using composite criteria we have to assign weights

Three methods i.e.1) Fixed index method 2) Variable index method 3) Cluster method is used to assign weights

Fixed Index Method: Under the fixed index method, a number of characteristics common to regions are chosen. (E.g. population, density, per capita income, unemployment, rate of industrialization) An arbitrary weight is given to each index and a single weighted mean is obtained for each region, then contiguous regions with similar indices are grouped together in order to minimize the variance within the group.

a b c d < 1000 e f g h 1000 -2000 i j k l 2000 -3000 m n o p 3000 - 4000 q r s t >4000

Population of Regionsa) 3800 e) 4600 I) 2600 m) 3100 q) 4100b) 600 f) 950 j) 2100 n) 4600 r) 3300c) 1800 g) 756 k) 1500 o) 300 s) 1100d) 2300 h) 3200 l) 2000 p) 1600 t) 1229

138


146

145

147

148

143127

144

104

124

125

147

157

151

129

141

153

140

138137

1395

126

137

132

128

3521

3125

2070

4471

3155806

1645

3815

124

990

1453

661

773

2416

6372

5687

6232

8263125

1497

3896

399

3511

SETTLEMENT PATTERN PRIMARY CLUSTERS

FINAL CLUSTERS Minimum 6000 population

Distance Not more than 4 Kms

6646

12811

11341

12811

11214

8263

6092

DELIMITATION OF REGIONS

The Variable Index Method Under the variable index method, variable weights are assigned to highlight the different regions. The weight given to each activity, in each region is different, in accordance with the value or the volume regionally produced.

For e.g., if region A is the wheat region and the region B is the coal region, the weight of the wheat index will be the largest in the former, and the weight of the coal index will be the largest in the latter. This method is good when those criteria can be compared with each other. However in those cases where compatibility is not possible (e.g., in case where one feature is literacy and the other is steel production) it becomes necessary to employ the cluster method

138


The Cluster Method Cluster means grouping together. This concept is used to implement IRDP. This concept is used in the planning as a strategy to strengthen lateral links and to dissipate growing vertical links in the settlement system. Such a cluster while providing greater viability and threshold for development efforts will also create for themselves a greater bargaining power in bringing about reciprocity in exchange of goods and services.

Both at the macro and micro level clustering can be done by (1) superimposing of maps and(2) by developing a composite index of development

138


DELINEATION OF REGIONS IN INDIAPhysiographic Regions

Dudley Stamp, Baker, Spate, Chaterjee1. The first attempt in classify natural regions or physiographic regions was made by L. Dudley Stamp (1922)

3 Major Natural Regions 22 Sub Regions scheme based on the homogeneity of physiography, structure & climate 2. JNL Baker made second attempt (1928). It was similar to Stamp’s 3. Spate (1957 & 1967) made another attempt based on Stamp’s & Baker’s work

The Mountain Rim

3 Macro Regions Indo Gangetic Plains

Peninsula34 Regions of first order74 Region of Second order225 Subdivisions

4. SP Chaterjee (1965) scheme of classification is considered as a standard one and it is frequently quoted by others.

138


S.P. Chaterjee Classification of Physiographic RegionsThe Great Mountain Wall

Western Himalayas Kashmir HimalayasPunjab Kumaan Himalayas

Eastern Himalayas Darjeeling Sikkim, Assam HimalayasEastern Bodar Hills & Plateau

The Great PlainSutlaj, Beas,Ravi Ganga,Upper Ganga Yamuna,BrahmaPutra

North Western North Punjab, South Punjab, RajasthanUpper Ganga Ganga Yamuna, Rohilkhand, Avadh

Middle GangaDeltaAssam Valley

The Great Plateau ofPeninsular India

North Western Peninsular Peninsular India

Aravalli Hills, Chambal BasinBundelkhand upland, MalwaVindhyan Scrap land

North EasternPeninsular Plateau

Baaghelkhand, Chattisgarsh BasinBastar Plateau, Orissa Hills, Chotnagpur Hills

Maharastra Western Ghats, Lava Plateau, Western Ganga Valley

Karnataka Plateau Malnad region, Maiden regionTamilnadu PlateauAndhra Plateau

Coastal Plains West Coast Kutch Peninsular, Kathiawar Peninsular, Gujarat Plains, Konkan Coast, Karnatic Malabar Coast

East Coast Tamilnadu Coast, Andhra Coast, Orissa Coast

The Island Laccadive, Minicoy & Amindivv, Andaman & Nicobar Islands

ECONOMIC REGIONALIZATION

138


Regionalization is an exercise of dividing regions of higher order into sub-regions or aggregating regions of lower order (small units) into those of higher order (regions). This is based on homogeneity in the selected characteristics or functional interdependence between the nodal centre and its hinterland or between the different functional centers of different hierarchic levels.Application

1. Regionalization for Planning – A strategy for areal development.2. Nodal Regionalization to create central places and functional intergration

Author Title Criteria used No. Of regions

1. V. Nath Resource development regions & divisions of india

Soil climate topography land use

15 regions

2. Bhat & Rao Regional planning for india

Distribution of natural resources

11 regions

3. Sen Gupta & Galina Sdasyuk

Population resource regions

Population density, growth rate, resource potentiality, levels of socio-economic disparity

3 regions dynamic, prospective, problematic

4. K.l. Vij & Chandra

Energy resource regionalization

Energy & power 8 regions

5. Sri. Hasim Inter regional linkages & economic regionalisation

Movement of 61 commodities

6 macro regions

6. Gidabhuly & Bhat

Economic regionalisation

Movement of 5 selected commodities

7.Chandrasekara Regional development & planning regions

Land & raw materials for industrial development

8. Sengupta Homogeneity, nodality, production specialization, energy resources

Economic Regionalization in India.

Delineation of natural or physiographic regions helps us to understand the basic geography of the country. It describes the existing situation only. But, for the purpose of planning it is necessary to study the natural resources of regions in detail and also to find out areas of potential development and to trace inter linkages among them (and within them) in such a fashion as to promote maximum development of resources.

By combining physio geographical, economic and socio-cultural variables we can have different homogeneous regions.Following classifications are frequently quoted in the books

1) The regionalization scheme proposed by V.Nath2) The regionalization scheme proposed by Bhat & Rao3) The regionalization scheme proposed by Sen Gupta & Galina Sdasyak4) The regionalization scheme proposed by S.R. Hashim5) The regionalization scheme proposed by Gidadhubly & Bhat

138


6) The regionalization scheme proposed by Sen Gupta7) The regionalization scheme proposed by Town & Country Planning

Organization.

1) The Scheme Proposed by V. Nath (1964) Title: Resource Development Regions and Divisions of IndiaObjectives:1) Providing a framework about the physical conditions & resource potential to planners both at the central & state level.2) Based on such identification helping the planners in planning the programs, adjustments in programs, content & pattern.3) Furnishing a scheme of homogeneous units within the state.Variables Used: Physical – topography, soils, Geologic Formation and climate –Agricultural- Land use & cropping pattern.

This study based on the earlier studies 1. Census 1951 2.Spate scheme 3. Indian Statistical Institute

Nath classified the country into 15 Resource Development Regions (RDRs).It is further classified into 61 RDRs.1. Western Himalayas 2.Eastern Himalayas3. Lower Gangetic plain 3.Middle Gangetic Plain4. Upper Gangetic plain 5. Trans Gangetic plane6. Eastern plateaus & Hill regions 7. Central plateaus & Hill regions8. Western plateaus & Hill regions 9. Southern plateaus & Hill regions10. East coast plains & Hills 11.West coast plains & Hills12. Gujarat plains & Hills 14.Western Dry regions15. The Islands

2) The Scheme of Bhat & RaoTitle: Regional planning in India.Variables Used: Distribution pattern of natural resources as represented in the maps and agricultural land use pattern on the basis of district wise data.Methodology:Major regions should have minimum disparities within and distinctiveness from their neighbours in respect of regional character and resources for development. While the regional development norm is common for the major region as a whole, sub - regions are identified depending upon the concentration of resources, problems for development and administrative convenience.

Scheme: 11 Major Regions 51 Sub regions.1. West Coast Region 2.Western Ghats3. Central Plateau 4.Eastern Ghats5. East West 6.North Eastern Plateau7. The Ganges Plain 8.Assam9. Gujarat 10.Rajasthan11. Kashmir

138


Bhat has made an another attempt to classify our country based on the presence of power and metallurgical base.

Macro Economic Regions Group of States1. Southern Region 1.Karnataka, Tamilnadu, A.P, Kerala2. Western Region 2.Maharasthra, Gujarat3. North Western Region 3.Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, J & K4. North Central Region 4.Uttar Pradesh & Madhya Pradesh5. Eastern Region Bihar, Orissa, West Bengal, Assam,

5. Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Tripura etc.

3. The Scheme proposed by P. Sen Gupta & Galina SdasyukTitle: Population Resource RegionsObjective: To understand the population characteristics in terms of territorial units like states, districts and thereby to assess the latent capacity of the country in supporting population.Variables Used Population (Density and growth rate), resource potentiality, and levels of socio-economic development.Scheme: Three major regions and 19 sub regions.

1 Dynamic regions

1. Parts of W.B, 2. Gujarat, 3. Maharasthra, 4.Tamilnadu 5. Punjab

The Dynamic Regions supports advanced industrial areas and predominantly urban population.

2 Prospective regions

1. Northern Eastern Peninsula 2. Godavari Basin, 3. Aravalli Hills & Malwa Plateau. 5. Brahma Putra Valley

The Prospective Regions have immense resource potential but face socio – economic obstacles to technological transformation.

3 Problem regions

1. Parts of Bihar & U.P 2. Orissa Coast, 3. Kerala Coast 4. Laccadive Islands, 5.Konkan Coast in Maharasthra & Karnataka, 6. Rajasthan Desert 7. North Western Himalayas 8. East Himalayas, 9. Andaman Islands

The Problem Regions are those which show little promise of development in the near future

4. The Scheme proposed by K. L Vij & C. K. ChandranTitle: Energy Resource Regionalization.Methodology: This scheme based on energy and power resources because those resources will play a dominant role in determining the distribution of industrial activities.Scheme: Eight Macro regions.

5. The Scheme proposed by S.R. HashimTitle: Inter-Regional Linkages & Economic Regionalization.Variables Used: Movement of 61 commodities based on Inland (Rail & River borne) trade accounts.Scheme: Six Macro regions

1) Assam, Manipur, Tiripura, Nagaland.2) West Bengal, Bihar, Orissa and Calcutta.3) Uttar Pradesh

138


4) Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Delhi, Rajasthan, Jammu & Kashmir.5) Gujarat, Maharasthra, Bombay.6) Goa, Karnataka, Kerala, Tamilnadu, Andhra Pradesh

6. The Study of Gidadhubly and BhatObjectives: To analyze the inter and intra regional relationship.Variables Used: Movement of five selected commodities i.e., Sugar, Cotton, Textiles, Cement, Coal, Iron and Steel.

7. The Scheme Proposed by Sen GuptaVariables used & Methodology: Keeping the natural regions of the country as a base and considerations of homogeneity, nodality, production, specialization, energy resources utilization etc in view and accepting the state boundaries, Sen Gupta suggested that within a frame work of meso regions that resource development of macro can regions take place.

Macro and Meso Regions of India – Sen Gupta’s ClassificationMacro Region Meso RegionNorth – Eastern Region (Assam, Manipur, NEFA Nagaland & Tiripura )

1. Upper Brahmaputra Valley, 2. LowerBrahmaputra Valley, 3. Mineralized Plateau, 4. Eastern and Northern Hills

Eastern region ( West Bengal Bihar and Orissa )

1. Calcutta- Hoogly region, 2.Damodar Valley area, 3. Chotanagpur and Northern Orissa Plateau, 4. Southern Hills and Plateaus of Orissa, 5. Lower Ganga Plain, Deltas and Coastal plain 6. Darjeeling Hills and Sub mountain tracts ( duara)

North Central Region (Uttar Pradesh ) 1. Northern Himalayan Area, 2 West Ganga Plain, 3. Eastern Ganga Plain

Central Region (Madhya Pradesh) 1. Eastern Madhya Pradesh, 2. Western Madhya Pradesh, 3. Bastar area, Central Madhya Pradesh.

North Western Region ( Rajasthan, Punjab, Haryana, Jammu & Kashmir and Himachal Pradesh)

1. Punjab Plain, 2. The Union territory of Delhi, 3. Western Rajasthan, 4.Eastern Rajasthan, 5. Himalayan Hills including Dun area, 6. Kashmir valley and its surrounding hills.

Western Region ( Maharasthra Gujarat, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu)

1. Bombay city and its sub-urban area, 2. Intervening area along the railway between Bombay and Nagpur, 3. Coastal part of Maharasthra, 4. Western Maharasthra mainly plateau area, 5. Eastern Maharasthra 5.Central Maharasthra, 7. Gujarat plain, 7.Sourasthra, 8. Kutch

Southern Region (Andhra Pradesh Mysore, Tamilnadu, Kerala, Pondicherry, Yanam, Goa, Andaman & Nicobar and Laccadive, Minicoy and Amindivi

1. Coastal Plain of Andhra Pradesh, 2.Telengana area, 3. Rayalaseema Area, 4.South Central Industrial Area, 5. South – Eastern Coast, 6. Anaimalai, Cardamom and Nilgiri Hills,& WesternCoast,7. Malnad and WesternGhat, area, 8. Maidan area, 9. Coral Islands.

Macro Regions = 7 Meso Regions = 4 + 6 + 3 + 4 + 6 + 9 +10 = 42

138


8.The Scheme Proposed by the Town & Country Planning Organization or C.S. Chandrasekhara’s Scheme.Title: Balanced Regional Development and planning regions Variables & Methodology Used: 1) Land, 2) Raw materials for industrial development, 3) Power. These factors will enable each planning region to achieve a degree pf self-sufficiency in food, an employment potential in the agricultural and non agricultural sectors to meet.the needs of the region’s population and a power base which will serve the developmental needs of both agriculture and industry.

Scheme: 13 Macro regions divided into 35 Meso regions.1) South Peninsula, 2) Central Peninsula,

3)Western Peninsula, 4) Central Deccan,

5) Eastern Peninsula, 6) Gujarat, 7) Western Rajasthan, 8) Aravalli Region, 9) Jammu & Kashmir, 10) Indo Gangetic Plain, 11) Ganga Yamuna Plains, 12) Lower Ganga Plains, 13) North Eastern Region.

138


UNIT II - REGIONAL IMBALANCES

Most of the countries of the world are faced with the problem of regional imbalances and regional inequalities. But it assumes a more acute and explosive form in the developing countries. The problem is assumed such a magnitude that their very political and economic stability is threatened. Rivalry and the search for maximal profits (including political advantage) engender the unevenness (disproportionately). The primary causes of regional imbalance can be located in the region making process itself. i.e., Geographic and Physiographic characteristics, History and Cultural experience. But there are much deeper causes as Lenin discovered, “The law unequal economic and political development under capitalism as a universal law characteristic of all stages of capitalist development and embracing all parts of the world capitalist economy”.

1) Whatever may be the causes, if marked differences in economic prosperity of different regions persists overtime, political discontent is bound to emerge sooner or later.

2) The problem becomes further complicated when economic disparities among regions overlap with differences in race, religion, language or culture of the people living in different regions.

3) Regional inequalities exist not only in the form of income or output levels among regions, but also in other forms such as unequal access of the people of different regions to economic and social services, employment opportunities or political power.1) eg. Jharkand, Darjeeling, Rayalaseena, Telangana issues.2) eg. North Eastern Part of our country, Cauvery issue.3) eg. Intra regional disparities existing in several states regarding industrial

establishment, health services some regions are more represented in the cabinet.

Theoretical Explanations

1. Classical Economist’s view2. Marxist view3. Perrouxian view4. Myrdal’s view5. Hirschman’s view6. Miscellaneous theories

138


1. Classical Economist’s ViewThe Classical economists hardly evince any interest in the spatial dimension of economic development. They believed that factor flows/ market forces would bring equilibrium automatically. They argued that wage and income levels among regions would not last long. They further argued that labor would flow from (migration) low wage region to high wage region, While capital will flow in the reverse direction (i.e., from high wage region to low wage regions). Classicalists view failed, and many economists started questioning the “Self Equilibrating Model” of the classical economists.Regional Disparities Table

Infrastructure – Indicators of Disparity

Regional disparitiesSocial Service Indicators

StatesPer capita expenditure on healthPer capita expenditure on educationInfant mortality per 1000 live births 1971 Life expectancy at birth 1971Physical quality of life indexAndhra Pradesh21.236.5113.6953.8920.6Assam17.038.1112.2253.5322.7Bihar12.227.7103.6254.7023.4Gujarat22.947.9152.2055.33 24.0Haryana28.046.410060.00.52.1Karnataka19.943.110050.52 37.6Kerala28.776.555.6561.00 100Madhya Pradesh17.229.9151.6953.89 14.8Maharashtra24.2 51.697.3258.72 57.6Orissa17.2 37.6103.3056.3035.2Punjab30.658.8103.2961.2361.6Rajasthan25.339.1147.8060.23 31.4Tamil Nadu20.945.9117.2055.00 36.4Uttar Pradesh11.727.7159.2654.295.3West Bengal22.043.2100.2557.2645.8All India20.240.1----------------------

StatesPower in kwhElectrified % in 1980Road length kmRailway length in kmNo. of post officesLiteracy

% in 1981No of hospitals 1000 sq.kmAndhra

Pradesh9563.4381731.329.92.1Assam3420.8732816.1------

0.7Bihar7930.5463115.2261.2Gujarat24064.1272925.943.81.0Haryana250100673319.735.81.

9Karnataka15364.4551526.638.41.8Kerala1041002322317.869.219.5Madhya

Pradesh9933.3231319.027.80.6Maharashtra22373.8531718.647.42.5Orissa11637.3741227.03

4.11.6Punjab328100904323.640.72.9Rajasthan10443.3181628.524.120.8Tamil

Nadu18199.01302924.945.82.9Uttar Pradesh9635.7633016.827.42.4West

Bengal11335.41584214.240.93.9All India13445.1491821.036.2 1.6

138


2. Marxist View: Regional disparity is the characteristic feature of capitalism and is aggravated by rivalry and competition and the search of maximal profits is the very nature of capitalist relations of production any by the private ownership of the means of production.

3. Perrouxian View:French Economist Perroux in his attempt to understand the modern process of economicdevelopment, discovered that,

a. Growth does not appear everywhere at the same time.b. It manifests itself in points or poles of growth with variable intensities.c. It spreads by different channels and with varying terminal effects for the economy

as a whole.[Perroux heavily relied on Schumpeter’s theory of economic development to explain why growth appears in a particular place. A/C to Schumpeter “development occurs as a result of discontinuous spurts in a dynamic world”]

According to Perroux once growth emerges in a particular place, it becomes centre of growing economic activities and in their turn induces growth in the dependent regions. A/C to Perroux the process of economic development is essentially unbalanced, and the centers of growth may give birth to other centers or it may become a centre of stagnation.

4.Myrdal’s View:The outstanding Swedish Economist Gunnar Myrdal was one of the first among western scholars to pay attention to the grave consequences, not only economic but political as well, which may result from the aggravation of disparities in economic development. In his book, “Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions” he presented the “Cumulative Causation Model”.

According to this model, economic development having started in some advantageous place, continues to develop in that place and the play of market forces normally tends to increase rather than decrease inequalities between regions. Myrdal goes on to argue that once growth starts through historical accident in a locality, “the ever increasing internal and external economies–(lower average costs of production from and increased rate of output, availability of trained workers, communication facilities, access to larger markets) tends to sustain the continuous growth at the expense of other localities and regions where instead relative stagnation or regression became the pattern”.

Myrdal explains the impact of the growing region (nucleus) on rest of the economy with the help of two opposite kinds of forces, which he calls the “Spread effect” and “Back wash effect”.

“The Spread effect” “The Spread effect” – refers to all growth inducing effects i.e., inflow of raw materials, new technologies, demand for the agricultural products, If strong enough, these forces may start a cumulative expansionary process in the lagging regions.

138


“The Backwash effect” “The Backwash effect” – refers to all adverse effects i.e., withdrawal of skilled labor from underdeveloped regions, capital and goods–all of which rush to the dynamic centre of development.Due to the accumulation of concentration advantages, the backwash effect predominates. This of course, increases the relative backwardness of underdeveloped regions. Thus Myrdal made a synthesis of various elements involved in the process of regional growth including agglomeration economies, factor flows, social environment, and role of public policy.

5.Hirschman’s View: Albert Hirschman, an American Economic Professor, explained economic growth process in terms strikingly similar those of Myrdal. Hirschman felt that “ Inter regional inequality of growth is an inevitable concomitant and condition of growth itself”. Hirschman explained his concept with the help of two terms i.e.,” Trickling–down effect” and Polarization effect”. Trickling down effect (analogous to Myrdal’s Spread effect) Polarization effect (analogous to backwash effect).

(Some economists criticized Hirschman’s theory of “economic transmission” – for having created terminological confusion for the terms already accepted in the scientific language)

UNIT II - THE EXTENT OF REGIONAL IMBALANCES.

Problems in UnderstandingProblems associated with understanding regional Imbalances.1) It is a misnomer to use the term “regional imbalance” in our country. It is advisable

to use the term ‘inter-state imbalances’ (states are analogous to regions but they are not regions in the strict academic sense) because information required to understand the spatial imbalances is available collected either at the state level or district level.

2) Even the data collected / information available are not comparable. Data / Information available in our country at their best can indicate the ‘broad trends’ only.

3) Absence of comparable data / information for all the aerial units (districts).4) The problem of selecting indicators to highlight the imbalances, for example

‘percapita’ income is widely used to highlight the disparities in our country. But this indicator suffers from many weaknesses. What are they?

1. Uncomparability:a. Price levels are different in different states.b. The commodities included in the compilation of

price level by different states are different.c. Weights assigned to different commodities are different in different states.

2. At times underdeveloped regions may possess better infrastructure and other preconditions for development compared with developed regions. Using percapita income may conceal other positive aspects.

Because of these reasons per capita income is uncomparable

1. Traditional Society

Pre-Newtonian science & technology

138


3. Some parts of our country is still depending on barter exchange (exchange in kind). Economy is still not fully monetized. So it is unwise to use percapita income which is calculated based on money exchange.

So on account of all these considerations, per capita income alone cannot be a sufficient indicator of development.

If ‘Per Capita Income’ is not sufficient, what are the other Indicators?1) Differences in Industrial Growth2) Disparities in Agricultural Growth3) Level of Literacy in different states4) Percentage of Urban population to total population5) Percentage of workers in manufacturing industries to total workers6) Total Road length7) Infant Mortality rate.

Some value judgment about Indicator may be Which indicator to choose what is important & unimportant important, but data indicator. may not be available It depends upon availability of

dataIndicator may not be important, but data may be available .

Disparities in Industrial Growth:Before Independence:Our Country inherited a lopsided pattern of Industrial development with most of the industries concentrated at a few centers and in some cases this concentration was not the result of natural advantages but was imposed by historical forces. This disparity in still continuing.

Cotton industry showed a tendency to disperse that too in a limited sense. The centers of concentration shifted from Bombay to Ahmedabad and to Coimbatore.

As far as soap industry is concerned Bengal & Bombay shared 86.3% of the workers.

As far as woolen industry is concerned United Province, Punjab, Bombay shared 80.0% of the total workers employed.

Identification of disparities based on1. Productive capital employed, 2.Total no. of workers, 3.Value addition and4. Gross output.

As per 1950 Information: The total share of capital employed was concentrated in West Bengal (24.65 %) and

Western Region (34.60%). Western Regions include Bombay State, Kutch, Sourasthra, Goa, Daman, Diu their combined share was 59.25%.

Both the regions (Western & West Bengal) accounted for 63.03% of the total persons employed.

Both the regions accounted for 60.41% of the gross ex-factory value of output.

Economy is not fully monetized

138


They accounted for 63.95% of value added by manufacture The rest of India (excluding Bengal & Western region ) accounted for

40.75% of the productive capital36.97% of the total persons employed39.59% of the gross ex factory value of output36.05% of the value added by manufacture

As per 1960 Information:(After 15 years of planned development no decline of concentration was noticed.), Maharastra, West Bengal, Gujarat (combined population was 22.0% of the national population.These three states accounted for 42.2% of the productive capital

50.1% of the total number of persons employed 53.1% of gross output

If we include Tamilnadu with these 58.8% of the total persons employedthree states, the 4 states accounted 61.6% of Gross outputfor (29.3% of the national population)

Bihar, U.P. and Orissa accounted for 31.1% of the total population 21.3% of the productive capital 14.5% of the persons employed 17.6% of the gross output

As per 1975 information (after 25 years of planning)Maharasthra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Tamil Nadu accounted for 29.81% of the total population 47.5% of the total factories 42.2% of the total fixed capital 53.1% of the total employment 57.0% of the total output 58.6% of the total value added.

The remaining 17 states (70.19% of the population) shared only 40% of the total output & value added.

Disparities in Consumption of Electricity: Disparities in per capita industrial consumption of electricity. ( KWh)

1969 –70 1976-77National average 57.5 68.4Gujarat 88.6 119.8Karnataka 64.1 107.8Kerala 57.3 68.1Maharasthra 114.0 120.4Orissa 57.6 71.2Punjab 138.5 143.5Tamilnadu 74.5 76.8West Bengal 86.3 78.8

138


Industrial Licensing Policy and Regional Imbalances:A policy and a legislation was passed (Industries Regulation & Development Act 1951) with the objectives of To regulate industrial investment and production Protecting the small entrepreneurs To prevent the monopoly and concentration To reduce the disparities among regions

The purpose of this policy is to grant more licensees for establishment of industries in the lagging regions and controlling the establishment of more industries in the leading regions by denying licensees to them.

Disparities in number of licenses issued.Out of the 2293 licenses issued during the period 1953 – 1961 Bombay, Calcutta, Madras, got 1778 licenses ( 35.77% )

Maharasthra , West Bengal , Gujarat & 59.31% of the applications Tamilnadu (1956-1966) accounted for 62.42% of the licenses approved Bihar and Orissa - 6.34% of the licenses approved

Uttar Pradesh & Madhya Pradesh - 9.17% of the licenses approved

Out of the total licenses Maharasthra 51% gone to 3 districts Bombay, Thana for issued for Poona

West Bengal 71% gone to Calcutta, Howrah & HooglyTamil Nadu 59% gone to Madras & Coimbatore.

In 1968 Pande Working Committee identified the backward areas of our country. Everybody expected that these areas would get more licenses based on that. What happened?

The backward areas of relatively more developed states received more licenses. Out of the total 486 licenses issued during the period 1970 – 1974, 227 licenses were

given to the backward districts located in Maharashtra, West Bengal, Gujarat and Tamilnadu.

The above facts demonstrate that industrial licensing policy has all along favored the already developed states while the claims of the backward states were ignored. Even when recommendations were made to grant more licenses to backward areas, the backward areas of the developed states received a preferential treatment. Even the licenses given to backward areas were not appropriate, since they did not possess sufficient spread effects and significant linkages.

Financial Institution and Regional Imbalances. The Central financial institutions also favored the backward area of the development states in granting direct assistance on concessional terms.Average per capita assistance extended by Financial Institutions Rs. 126.12

138


Average per capita assistance extended to Tamilnadu Rs. 188.26Average per capita assistance extended to Punjab Rs. 168.40Average per capita assistance extended to Maharasthra Rs. 255.54Average per capita assistance extended to Karnataka Rs. 163.43Average per capita assistance extended to Haryana Rs. 268.39Average per capita assistance extended to Gujarat Rs. 316.79Average per capita assistance extended to Bihar Rs. 56.41Average per capita assistance extended to Uttar Pradesh Rs. 75.22Average per capita assistance extended to West Bengal Rs. 98.93Average per capita assistance extended to Madhya Pradesh Rs. 65.45

Commercial Banks and Regional Imbalances:Commercial banks gave a large proportion of their advances to the developed industrial states. A more serious allegation leveled against them is that they worked as channels through which funds from backward states kept flowing to the developed states. This situation has not changed even after the nationalization of banks in 1969.

Other Indicators of Disparities:The choice of indicators should depend upon the value judgement and the availability of data. The chosen indicators should be relevant, objective and measurable and reflect the multidimensional character of development. Several attempts were made by persons like, Ashok Mitra V. Nath Hemalatha Rao Ganguli & Gupta.

138


Indicators to measure Development & Under development

New Perspective in Regional Disparities in Development- Indian View

The problem of regional disparities in development is not taken seriously and inconsistently dealt in the concept of development. Regional disparities are the manifestation of spatial injustice and should be reduced for attaining the goal of just and egalitarian society. But, in reality the regional disparities in development are more acute and quite persistent at global, national and international level. Therefore it would be a quite fruitful exercise to explore into the theoretical expositions and actual position in regard to regional disparities at the various scale of spatial units. The findings may be helpful in the plan formulation for the removal of regional disparities, which is a main plank of contemporary development planning of all the developing countries.

Indicators to measure Development & under developmentDevelopment Index for Agricultural SectorAgricultural output per lakh of population / per capita production of food grains.Agricultural output per worker. Gross area irrigated as percentage of grass area sown.Yield per hectare. Consumption of fertilizers per 1000 hectares of gross cropped areaArea under commercial crops / Mechanization index.Index for Industrial DevelopmentNumber of factories per lakh of population / 1000 km2

Percentage of Industrial workers to total workersHigh Voltage Industrial power consumptionPercapita gross output / Value additionIndex for Banking Development Number of banks per lakh of populationDeposits in banks per lakh of populationPercentage of bank offices to bank offices in the countryPercentage of deposits in the total depositsPercentage of credits in the total depositsIndex for Educational DevelopmentLiteracy ratePercentage of school going children to total populationPercentage of college / university students to total populationNumber of schools /Number of colleges per 1000 sq.kmNumber of colleges /Number of teachers per lakh of populationFemale Literacy rateIndex for Infra Structure DevelopmentRoad length in Kms per 100 Sq.Km of areaNumber of post, telegraph and telephones per 1000 sq.kmNumber of post, telegraph and telephones per lakh populationPercentage of electrified villages to total villages inhabitedPer capita consumption of electricity.Index for Medical Services Number of Government / Private medical centers per lakh populationNumber of hospitals beds per lakh of populationNumber of professionals (Doctors/ Nurses) per lakh population.

138


Disparities in the development has been a theme of great academic interest and practical significance during the post world war 2nd period when a large number of colonies attained political independence and became conscious of the distressing disparity that existed between those colonies and their erstwhile colonial master. The contemporary world consisted of two-different realms; one that of the west, immensely rich, industrialized, urbanized and with a history of steady development since the industrial revolution, the other of newly independent countries, abysmally poor, agricultural, rural and with an equally long history of exploitation and stagnation. This dualism could not escape the concern of academicians, politicians and administrators.

Several studies were undertaken and numerous theories were postulated to explain the global duality of development and underdevelopment. Hinderink and Sterkenburg (1978) classified the studies dealing with regional disparities into three types: those which use space as a mere framework to describe regional differences in

development; those which employ space, particularly in terms of physical space and built

environment, as an explanatory variable to analyze spatial inequality; and those which adopt space with reference to the level and nature of its development, as

a variable to be explained through historically developed politico-economic social structure.

Spatial theories of unequal development were also grouped by Nash (1963) into three categories of spatial differentiation, spatial diffusion and spatial integration. This classification was based on the mode of analysis adopted. An improvement upon it was suggested by Browlet (1980) who again offered a three-fold classification of various theories into those which deal with comparative analysis of development pattern, which make inductive study of development stages in a specific region, and which examine the process of spatial diffusion of development. This grouping was done essentially in the context of diffusionist development paradigm which highlights the role of spatial interaction.

For a convenient understanding, theories, explaining development in spatial context may be divided into two categories; those which emphasized the play of intra-regional factors leading to development or

underdevelopment, and those which stressed the role of spatial interaction between developed and

underdeveloped regions, largely detrimental to the interest of the latter. What explains development and underdevelopment spatially from the basis of this grouping?

Theory Emphasizing Intra-Regional FactorsTheories in this group assign importance to factors relating to natural resources, technical advancement, and social institutions that hindered or accelerated the process of development in any areas.

Nurkse’s (1958) ‘vicious circle theory’ Nurkse’s (1958) ‘vicious circle theory’ presented an attractive idea that underdeveloped countries were trapped in a series of interlocking problems of poverty and stagnation. The starting point was poverty, which was an insurmountable obstacle to development.

138


If this thesis was valid then it would be difficult to understand as to how the presently developed countries, which were not so always could make advancement.

Boeke (1953) Boeke (1953) attributed underdevelopment in the oriental world to limited needs, backward sloping supply curves of effort and risk taking, and an absence of profit seeking attitude. He stressed that the eastern society was moulded by fatalism and resignation. His gloomy analysis was rightly questioned by a number of scholars including Lewis, Baner, and Yarney McClelland (1961) McClelland (1961) found a high association between a country’s level of achievement motivation and rate of its economic development. Hagen (1962) Hagen (1962) postulated ‘authoritarian theory’ holding feudal bringing up of the children responsible for the economic development of a country, In his ‘theory of social deviance’, Hoselitz (1960) Hoselitz (1960) assigned key role to ‘deviants’ in development. He defined deviants as the one who break traditions, adopt innovations and thereby accelerate the process of transformation from underdevelopment to development. George (1981) George (1981) accused the local elites of the third world countries as the real cause of underdevelopment in postcolonial situation. According to her these elites remained the natural friends of western developed countries and exploited the native poor for their own vested interest and retarded the process of development.Berry (1969) Berry (1969) underlined the development role of integrated urban hierarchy in which innovations filtered down from cities to towns and from both to their surrounding countryside. Llyod and Dicken (1972) Llyod and Dicken (1972) observed that definable hierarchy of central places was a characteristic feature of an economically developed region. Johnson (1965) associated development inequality with varying access to urban market.

Some other theories described the sequence of development phases, and viewed the existing gap between developed and developing countries as a matter of time lag. The chief exponents of this historical thesis were German scholars namely list, Brune, Hilderbrand, Bucher, Schmoller and Sombart. Rostow (1960) Rostow (1960) borrowing an analogy from the flight of an airplane noted five stages in economic transformation of a capitalist society: traditional society precondition for

138


138


take-off, drive to maturity and age of High Mass consumption. The different countries of the world could be assigned to a particular stage a given point in time.Theories reviewed above explained development and underdevelopment in an area and regional disparities accruing out of them through the intrinsic conditions. Role of social, psychological and spatial factors were emphasized. The historical perspective was strong in most of them.

Theory Emphasizing Spatial InteractionThe second group of theories, with spatial interaction as the main analytical framework, viewed development and underdevelopment as the two facets of the same coin. Development in one region was at the cost of underdevelopment in some other due to operation of ‘backwash effect.’ Western colonial power exploited the third world through direct control during the colonial period and through tied trade and by extension of their aid and model of development in postcolonial period. The developed world created third world and third world created fourth world in their own countries by the greed of elites, arrogance of bureaucrats, hypocrisy of politicians and of western trained pseudo planners and academicians

In just contrast some theories, such as ‘Growth Pole’ of Perroux, Boudville and Richardson, ‘Spatial Diffusion’ of Haggerstrand (1967): and ‘Growth Foci’ of Misra et al. (1976) gave due recognition to spread effects of development. These theories envisaged that if metropolitan development is sustained at high level, differences between center and periphery may be eliminated, as the economic dynamism of the major cities trickle down to smaller places and ultimately into most tradition bound peripheral areas.

The spatial interaction theories derived their meaning from three different context of space economy; free market mechanism, colonial setting and neocolonial situation. Free market mechanism was always biased in favor of development areas. ‘Core-Periphery Theory’ by Friedmann (1966), ‘Circular and Cumulative Causation Theory’ by Myrdal (1957) represented this context. These theories are well known and need no elaboration.

The second was colonial setting in which the imperial powers flourished at the cost of the their colonies siphoning off the latter resources. This was well illustrated by colonial dependency theory of Kundu and Raza (1982) and in the writing of Marxist scholars such as Davey (1975) and Pavlov et all, (1975).

The third context was postcolonial situation in which the newly independent developing countries remained dependent on developed countries and found it difficult to extricate themselves from the network of exploitation. Amin (1974) called this process ‘Peripheral Capitalism’ and Santos used the term ‘dependent capitalism’ (1978). The other exponents of this idea were Baram (1970), Frank (1972), Fanon (1963) and Potekin (1962).

Most of the scholars referred to above tried to explain multifaceted and multi-causal phenomenon of development and regional disparities in development by a one-dimensional theory. This amounted to some distortion of the fact. Therefore to reach on a conclusive result an in-depth analysis of ground realities in regard to development disparities in different regions and various countries of the world is needed.

138


UNIT II - HYPOTHESIS ON REGIONAL DISPARITIES

On the basis of study of trend and pattern of regional disparities in development in different regions and various countries of the world the four hypotheses were extended:

1. Spatial Convergence The first hypothesis was spatial convergence based on development experiences of the western developed countries. It was stated that regional disparities tend to lessen with the process of development. The hypothesis found its support in the ‘Spread and Backwash Theory’ of Myrdal (1957), ‘Trickle Down and Polarization Effect Theory’ of Hirschman (1958), Urban Hierarchy Thesis for Development Innovation of Berry (1969), Growth Pole Theory of Perraux, Baudville and Richardson, Spatial Diffusion of Haggerstrand (1967) and Growth Foci of Misra et al., (1976).

2. Spatial convergence hypothesis The spatial convergence hypothesis was falsified in case of third world developing countries where regional disparities increased with the process of development. In these countries the self-perpetuation hypothesis was based on the findings of Latin American and African situation and found its support in colonial and neocolonial dependency theory of Frank (1972), Amin (1974) and Kundu and Raza (1982). Additional point that favoured this hypothesis was development planning based on the principle of techno-economic efficiency and demonstration effort. In the capital scarce third world countries the meager development resources were invested in economically efficient regions that accelerated the regional disparities.

3. Concentration cycle hypothesis The third hypothesis, which was concentration cycle hypothesis, is a synthesis of convergence and divergence hypothesis. It is well known as inverted ‘u’ shape hypothesis of Williamson (1965). It denotes that regional disparities increases in the beginning of development process remain constant for some time and ultimately decrease with the process of development. It may be true in case of very long duration of time. However, the experience of developing countries showed that there was no visible sign for the decrease of regional disparities in these countries.

Recently some novel facts in regard to regional disparities in development were disclosed: At the global level fourth world countries namely Afghanistan, Nepal and Ethiopia

which were poorest pocket of the world (Dubey, 1984). The degree of regional disparities varied from one area to another within the same

country (Tewari, 1985). The regional disparities in various components of development do no move with

same intensity and some time moved in opposite direction (Singh and Dubey, 1985; Dubey, 1988).

All these facts lead to fourth hypothesis that there is no association between development and regional disparities. In short it may be stated as ‘no trade-off hypothesis.’ Now it would be better to investigate the position of regional disparities in India in the light of above discussed hypothesis.

138


UNIT II - REGIONAL DISPARITIES IN INDIA- II

A large number of studies carried out at different scale of spatial units namely States ( Mishra 1915; Bhat 1982), National Sample Survey Regions (Kundu and Raza, 1982); Districts (Krishan, 1984; Pal, 1975) and Tahsils (Talukas) (Dubey, 1981; Gosal and Krishan, 1979 and Alam, 1974 and Mitra, 1967) showed that regional disparities in India were high. Most of the scholars of regional disparities agreed that regional distortion created during colonial days was exacerbated on post-independence period (see Krishan, 1084; Nair, 1984; Kundu and Raza, 1982; Mathur, 1984). But this postulation was based mostly on theoretical understanding and disjointed linkages of development disparities of various periods of time and/or relating to various parts of the country. As far as our understanding there is altogether dearth of the empirical study that visualized the trend of regional disparities comprising colonial and post-independence period.

Generally the study of trend of regional disparities remained exclusive domain of economists. Most of them employed per capita GDP as surrogate measure of regional disparities in the development and used state as unit of investigation (Nair 1985, Singh 1985, Mathur 1978, Mahajan 1972). The data of per capita GDP was not available for the colonial days. Secondly, a new spatial administrative structure of the state was formed in 1956 by state reorganization. These two factors made back longitudinal comparison of regional disparities almost an impossible task.

The study deal with the trend of regional disparities during post-independence period suffered from two handicaps. First these studies only demonstrated the trend under operation. To confirm the self-perpetuation hypothesis the position of regional disparities at least three point of time was needed; at the starting of post-colonial development, after the post-colonial development, after the post-colonial development and equal period back in colonial days. This type of study would reveal that if the regional disparities increased in post-independence period then increase was more or less rapid to that of colonial period. If this was less or remained constant, it would manifest a positive sign in the sense at least increasing trend of regional disparities of colonial period was arrested. The self-perpetuation hypothesis would be only confirmed in case of more rapid increase of regional disparities in post-independence period. But this type of study was not possible on the basis of per capita GDP indicator.

The second the measurement of regional disparities by one surrogate indicator of per capita GDP did not manifest the structural composition and trend of regional disparities of the different components of development where lied the real problem. As the Finance Commission in India in allocation of central assistance to the state take care of backwardness of states measured on the basis of per capita income. It is but natural that disparities amongst the states will be lessened not only the basis of full and free operation of development but also due to the consequence of central assistance provided by the federal governments. Hence per capita GDP does not manifest the real trend of disparities in development.

As indicated above the removal of regional disparities is one of the basic planks of Indian planning. Apart from fiscal and financial measures the Indian constitution also envisaged the free mobility of people and resources within the country is a potential

138


factor in the removal of the foot. Despite the existence of the even remained constant, it posed as alarming situation. In this context a brief perusal of planning and development process and their impacts on regional disparities would be more revealing.

On the eve of planning period, just after independence, the problems of refugee settlement, food problem and problem of national reconstruction and development were all pervasive. To solve all these problems centralized macro planning was more planning was more effective. Therefore in the First Five Year Plan (1951-56) agricultural development with emphasis on development of irrigation and power generation was the central theme. And in Second Five year Plan (1956-61) overall industrial development was the chief objective of the plan. It was considered that multipurpose projects and establishment of large industrial territorial complexes with their porous impact in the area of their location would take care of balanced regional development. But in a pioneering study on ‘Occupational Structure and Level of Economic Development in India’ Swartzberg (1961) found that prominent administrative, commercial and industrial centersmade little impact on the development of their surrounding areas. These centers remained a prosperity cathedral in the poverty desert.

Apart from this the Community Development Project (CDP) was launched all over the country in 1952 for the development of the rural areas. Here it would be worthwhile to emphasize that for the uniform development of all the areas the blanket treatment of all the areas CDP was a major factor in the perpetuation of regional disparities and structural inequalities. Reason being in an unequal regional development conditions and in an unequal society a legacy of colonial past equal treatment exacerbated already existing spatial and structural inequalities (Dubey, 1987).

After the state reorganization in 1956 on the basis of linguistic homogeneity state planning became significant for the regional development during Third Five Year Plan (1961-1966). At that time know-how of planning at the state level was meager. The State Plans remained mere sectorial demand draft in conformity with central line departments (Dubey, 1988).

The centralized sectoral planning tendencies became very strong in mid-sixties. The country faced an abnormal situation in the form of Indo-Pak War (1965) and severe droughts in 1965 and 1966 (Bharat, 1984). The food problem was aggravated. Therefore, package programs for agricultural development like Intensive Agricultural District Program (IADP), Intensive Agricultural Area Program (IAAP), and High Yielding Varieties Program were introduced. The most crucial, was the introduction, of Green Revolution Technology a basket of technology of irrigation, fertilizers and new variety seeds. The notable feature of these programs was that all these programs were beneficiaries of these programs were the cultivators who owned the land for cultivation. And thirdly, these area oriented programs were implemented by the central line departments on the principle of economic efficiency.

In this way the development for all practical purposes became agricultural development. In the allocation of development assistance the principle of economic incrementalism was followed whereby those places already well endowed by being favored in the past got proportionately greater share. The states invested central grants and subsidies in the

138


areas which were economically more efficient. This solved the food problems at national level but accelerated the regional disparities and inter-personal inequalities.

Confronted with the problem of regional and structural inequalities government shifted its emphasis from ‘economic efficiency’ to development with equitable distribution’ to cope the problem of increasing inter-states and intra-states disparities. The National Planning Commission advised the State Planning Departments for the formulation of separate plan for the backward area development in Fourth Five Year Plan (1969-74). A number of fiscal and financial measures were introduced for the backward area development. Drought Prone Area Program (DPAP), Hill Area Development (HAD), Integrated Tribal Development Project (IIDP), Command Area Development Agency (CADA), for the development of special problem areas were given emphasis.

The above policy of backward area development was followed more vigorously during Fifth Five Year Plan (1974-78) and Sixth Five Year Plan (1980-85). But the working experience of this area indicates that unequal social and economic structures of traditional societes accelerated the inter-personal distances. These programs benefited the powerful groups and already richer section of the society and by passed the poor people.

In order to benefit the weaker section of the society poor people oriented i.e., target group oriented programs were started. To reduce the structural inequality and specifically to benefit the Training of Rural Youth for Self-employment (TRYSEM), Antyodaya. National Rural Employment Scheme (UCDS) and Development of Women and Children in Rural Areas (DWACRA) were undertaken in some selected areas.

The chief attribute of all these area and people oriented programs was that these programs were formulated by the central departments and were extended to the state governments for the implementation. Mostly the central or state line departments were responsible for their implementation at the grassroots level with blocks or districts as the spatial units of implementation. A large number of developments, without proper coordination at grassroots level, resulted into multiplicity of functions in one area and altogether neglect areas that also accelerated the process of regional disparities.

The Chief attribute of all these area and people oriented programs was that these programs were formulated by the central departments and were extended to the state governments for the implementation. Mostly the central or state line departments were responsible for their implementation at the grassroots level with blocks or districts as the spatial units of implementation. A large number of development departments independently involved in development, without proper coordination at grassroots level, resulted into multiplicity of functions in one area and altogether neglect of another areas that also accelerated the process of regional disparities.

To solve the problem of regional disparities by accelerating the process of development in backward areas decentralized planning or micro area approach was suggested by working group on block level planning (1977), working group on district planning and Rao Committee to review the existing administrative arrangements for rural development and poverty alleviation (see IIPA, 1997). Most of the state started decentralized planning

138


and district was adopted as the grassroots planning unit. Now the development budgets of the states are divided into heads:

(i) ‘Divisible pool’ earmarked for the district plan sector and ‘non-divisible pool’ remained under the state sector schemes.

How far the decentralized districts level planning was effective in the reduction ofregional disparities is still to be seen. A quick exercise made by the present author in case of Uttar Pradesh, the mini India, revealed that the impact of disparities during 1981-82 to 1984-85 was not significant. The year 1981-82 was the year of introduction of district planning in the state and 1984-85 was the latest year for which data was available. But the exercise has two ‘after’ decentralized planning position. It was a picture of trend in operation. But the real significance of decentralized planning position. In other words, to reach a conclusive result the measurement of inter-district disparities at three point of time was needed:(i) at the starting of decentralized planning;(ii) after the commencement of decentralized planning; and (iii) equal period back from the starting of decentralized planning.

Only then the real change in trend of regional disparities may be obtained.The Second Limitation of the exercise was too short span of time to assess for the impact of decentralized planning. When the needed data for the year 1987-88 would be available then 5 years without decentralized district level planning (1977-78 to 1982-83) would provide more meaningful result.

Conclusion and SuggestionIn sum, in case of regional disparities in India the convergence hypothesis of regional disparities was not confirmed. It is very difficult to confirm the hypothesis of perpetuation of colonial disparities in post-independence period in the lack of empirical study of regional disparities pertaining to colonial period. The inverted ‘U’ shape hypothesis of Williamson was also rejected in case of India. With the changing trend of regional disparities from one period to another and from one component to another favoured the no trade hypothesis. It is not the development per se but the strategy of development that matters in case of regional disparities.

The Certain dimensions of regional disparities are still dark; it remained unexplored which area contributed in the increase and / or decrease of regional disparities by upward and by downward movements in the process of development. How far the spatial pattern of development changed from colonial to subsequent independent period and how far colonial trend was accelerated or restarted. Whether the intensity of regional disparities changing from one state to another state? To what extent the Finance Commission was effective in reduction of regional disparities? And how far the trend and pattern of regional disparities of corresponded to that of other development and developing countries of the world. All these areas are very potential ground that needed immediate exploration.

138

SYNOPSISRegionPlanning Regional Planning DefinitionsNeed for Regional Planning / objectives Features of Regional PlanningUnit of Planning – meaning Characteristics of planning region Role of regional planningRegional planning and five year plansRegional planning / development policies (Three conceptualizations)


UNIT II - REGIONAL PLANNING

Region It means ‘a tract of land; an area homogeneous with respect to announced criteria’ “larger than any single urban area i.e. ‘supra urban’ space’.

The word ‘region’ is also used to stand for a tract of land, which is smaller than the individual state but larger than its basic territorial unit, namely the district. This meaning has been recognized in governmental pronouncements as well. The planning commission, for instance, employs this term to convey such a meaning, but in none of the five-year plans, it has made this explicit.

Planning Planning means making decisions in advance Planning may be viewed as highly disciplined and formalized activity through which a society induces change in itself. It involves the application of scientific knowledge in order to solve the problems and achieve the goals of a social system. Any social system, therefore, which has adopted planning, whether it is a firm, family, town or region may hope to determine its own future. Further, in evaluating the steps taken to reach this future, it may learn and through learning it may engage in a continual process of self-realization.

Regional Planning Regional Planning is essentially a process of orderly and systematic anticipation of the future of a region, involving recommendations of the necessary remedial and constructive actions by public and private agencies to achieve the objectives of the plan/regional community.

Regional development is the provision of aid and other assistance to regions which are less economically developed. Regional development may be domestic or international in nature. The implications and scope of regional development may therefore vary in accordance with the definition of a region, and how the region and its boundaries are perceived internally and externally.

138


Regional planning may involve extensive areas that include one or more regions or more limited areas such as drainage basins or metropolitan areas.

eg :Southern Regions (Tamil nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala) European Economic Market, Colombo Plan, SAARC Damodar Valley, TVA, Vaigai Periyar Command Area Madurai Metropolitan Planning Area.

Regional planning on one hand is an extension of local planning at the municipal or country level and on the other hand is a part of national and international planning.

Why Regional planning: (Objectives)Basically the purpose of Regional Planning is to correct the distortions in the planning process.General objectives of Regional Planning are as follows:1. The clash between economic goals (formulated in terms of outputs only) and the

social development objectives and needs.2. The concentration of industry and infrastructure in a few areas thus creating enclaves

of modernization in the midst of growing economic stagnation.3. Undue emphasis on heavy industry to the neglect of agriculture 4. Promoting a pattern of education unsuited to the needs of general masses5. Problems of inadequate employment opportunities.6. Problems of adequately exploiting resources in a particular area.7. Overcoming limitations on agriculture through the use of most advanced technology.8. The problem of improving access to and the distribution of the higher order type of

social facilities.9. The problem of insecurity in some newly acquired territorial addition to the state.10. The problem of groups experiencing social economic or political disadvantages in

some area of the ‘nation state’.11. The problem of experiencing physical discomfort through overcrowding and

congestion.

Features of Regional Planning: Regional Planning is a bridge between national economic planning and local

physical planning. Opportunity for the regional governments to order its own affairs. Regional Planning is holistic – i.e. economic, social and physical.

Unit of PlanningThe important question in regional planning is “What should be the unit of planning”? Planning Region (Unit) (1) should be large enough to take investment decisions of economic size, (2) should be able to supply its own industry with necessary raw materials and

labor, (3) should have a homogeneous economic structure, (4) contain at least one growth point and (5) Have a common approach to and awareness of its problems”. – Klaussen

138


Planning region to be an area that is large enough to enable substantial changes in the distribution of population and employment to take place within its boundaries, yet which is small enough for its planning problems to be viewed as a whole – Keeble.

In demarcating planning regions, administrative convenience assumes paramount importance, but for the sake of administrative convenience one should not forget about the homogeneity and nodality. So, homogeneity, nodality and administrative convenience should given equal importance.

Characteristics of a Planning Region:1) Contiguity Geographically it should be a contiguous unit, though could be sub divided into plain, hilly tract, coastal2) Social cultural homogeneity The people of the region should have social and cultural cohesiveness.3) Separate data collection unitThe region should have a separate unit for data collection and analysis.4. Economic ExistenceThe region should have an economic existence, which can be assessed from statistical records.5) People’s participation It should be small enough to ensure local people’s participation in its development.6) Span of controlIt should be under one administrative agency.7) Optimum sizeIt should not be too small. Its geographical size should be big enough to exploit resources and avoid duplication (by way of partially used capacity in neighboring regions). This is as much relevant for new investments in capital for production as for technical training, medical facilities colleges etc. It should be big enough to permit the major part of labor requirements in any employing center to be met from within the region. 8) Minimum (or) narrow disparityIt should have fairly homogeneous economic structure, i.e. the variation in local proportions of employment and output in agriculture; industry and services should be within a narrow range. To this we may also add a minimum topographical homogeneity which ensures absence of seasonal or permanent breaks in road links.9) Presence of growth pointIt should have one or more growth points.10) Consensus in defining problems and solving itThere should be common aspirations and approaches to their solution; it should permit and encourage competition but not rivalry or apathy between one area and the other.

Role of Regional Planning The main purpose of regional planning is to ensure optimal utilization of space and optimal distribution pattern of human activities over the space. To achieve this, it plays either.

138


1. Passive or indicative role

Passive or indicative role is to point out how the sectoral investments decision canbe integrated at the regional level and the advantages there of.2. Active or imperative role Active or imperative role is formulating and then implementing measures to assist the growth of certain regions, while restraining the growth of others

Regional Planning and Five Year PlansI FYP: A research committee was set up to study about the problem.II FYP: The plan emphasized

a) Less developed areas should receive due attention b) Keep the claims of underdeveloped regions in mind while deciding the

location of new enterprises.III FYP: There was a separate chapter on “balanced regional development”. The plan emphasized

a) Balanced development of different parts of the country, b) Extension of benefits of economic progress to the less developed regions c) Wide spread diffusion of industry

IV FYP: Attempts were made to identify the backward regions (Pande Committee) for the purpose of granting concessions and financial assistance to industries (Wanchoo

Committee) was initiated and weight age given to backward states in allocation of central assistance.

V FYP: Emphasis was laid on as follows: a) Resource / Problem based Area Programs: DPAP, CADP, HADP b) Target Group Programs: SFDA, MFDA c) Area Specific Incentive Programs: Sub Plan Approach for Hill / Tribal areas.

Other Five Year Plans …. Regional development policy-conceptualization

Considering the period of planning as a whole the policies adopted by the govt can be classified into either of the following categories.

Regional Development Policy ConceptualizationConceptualization - I1) Policies aimed at industrialization of lagging regions eg. a) Location of public sector projects in backward regions

b) Use of industrial licensing policy to direct private investment in backward in backward areas.c) Encouragement to prospective entrepreneurs to set-up industries in backward areas.

2) Policies for development of irrigation, agriculture & allied activities eg. a) Command area, Drought prone Area, Hill Area development3) Policies aimed at providing infrastructural etc in facilities regions transport,

communication, banking etc in backward regions

138


4) Transfer of resources from centre to state in the form of plan assistance, non plan assistance and discretionary grants in such a way so as to reduce regional disparities.

5) Special Programs for the development of backward and less developed regions

II Dr.K.V. Sundaram’s Conceptualization of Regional Development Policies1. An inter-regional allocation policy for the distribution if central assistance / funds to

State Governments governed by a formula tilted in favour of backward areas.2. Incentive Policies designed to direct investments in the industrially backward

districts.3. Action planning based on area / regional development approach to tackle identified

problem areas – tribal areas, hill areas, drought prone areas, desert and flood prone areas, problem region like north-east.

4. Integrated approach to local level planning focused on the district and the block.5. A basic needs strategy oriented towards the provision of minimum needs, so that

disadvantaged areas and groups may achieve parity with others in terms of social consumption.

III Policy measures to abolish regional in balance in India1. Capital and Technology transfers.2. Incentive policies for agricultural and industrial growth3. Land development and resettlement with a package of incentives 4. Rationalization Strategy.5. Integrated development focused on delimited small areas 6. Target group approaches 7. Bottom-up strategies and decentralized development8. Comprehensive regional planning approach.

138


UNIT III - BACKWARD AREA DEVELOPMENT

Attempts to identify the poorest or most backward districts in the country have been madesince 1960. A committee of the Government of India’s Ministry of Rural Areas andEmployment the previous name for the Ministry of Rural Development conducted one ofthe most elaborate exercises for the identification of backward districts in 1997. Headedby EAS Sarma, who was then Principal Advisor to the Planning Commission, thecommittee used a composite method with differing weights for parameters such as:

Incidence of povertyEducationHealthWater supplyTransport and communications, andDegree of industrialization.

The Sarma Committee's list of 100 most backward districts included:38 districts from undivided Bihar19 from undivided Madhya Pradesh17 from undivided Uttar Pradesh10 from Maharashtra, andA smaller number of districts from other states

There were no districts from Gujarat, Goa, Kerala, Punjab, Andhra Pradesh and TamilNadu. The committee did not consider the northeastern states and Jammu andKashmir as it felt "they had problems which were specific and peculiar to them".

List of Backward Districts in India Uttar Pradesh 68 Madhya Pradesh 40Bihar 37 Rajasthan 32Orissa 18 Assam 17Jharkhand 17 Arunachal Pradesh 13Chattisgarh 12 Haryana 11J & K 8 Karnataka 7Nagaland 7 West Bengal 7Gujarat 5 Maharashtra 5Manipur 5 Meghalaya 5Uttaranchal 5 Mizoram 2Punjab 2 Andhra Pradesh 1Dadra & Nagar Haveli 1 Sikkim 1Tripura 1 Total 327

The Desert, Drought Prone and Backward Areas (Integrated Development) Bill, 2006 ‘‘Backward Areas’’ include the desert and drought prone areas with very lowor scanty rainfall and the areas which are economically, industrially, educationally andsocially lagging behind from the rest of the country and so declared by CentralGovernment by notification in the Official Gazette;

138


The criteria recommended by these committees for identification ofBackward areas:1. Density of population per sq.km. of area.2. Percentage of agricultural workers to total workers.3. Percentage of literate population.4. Percentage of school going children.5. Total per-capita income.6. Per capita income from agriculture.7. Sex ratio, industry and mining.8. Availability of infrastructural facilities.9. Per capita consumption of electricity10. Chronically drought prone areas.11. Chronically flood prone areas.12. Length of surfaced roads per 100 sq. km. Of area.13. Public health care system.14. Safe drinking water facility.15. Poverty rates.

List of Backward Blocks in Tamilnadu

Name of the District Name of the Backward Blocks

1 KANCHIPURAM 1. Wallajnabad 2.Kancheepuram (Urban) 3.Lathur 4.Chitahamur 2 THIRUVALLUR 1. Poondi 2.Kadambathur

3 CUDDALORE 1. Portonovo 2.Melbhuvanagiri

4 VILLUPURAM 1. Melmalayanur 2.Vallam 3.Thirunavalkur 4.Kanai 5.Kandamangalam 6.Thagadurgam 7.Rishivandiyam 8.Kalrayan Hills

5 VELLORE 1. Arcot 2.Jolarpet 3.Kandhili 4.Nemili 6 THIRUVANNAMALAI 1. Cheyyar 2.Vembakkam 3.Polur 4.Chetput 5.Jawadhu Hils 6.Pudupalayam

7.Thandayampet 7 DHARMAPURI 1. Mathur 2.Veppanapalli 8 KARUR Kadavur 2.Thogaimalai 3.Perambalur District 4.Uppiliyapuram

5.Andimadam 6.T. Palur 7.Alathur 8.Veppanthattai 9.Veppur 10.Sendurai 11.Thirumanur

9 TIRUCHIRAPALLI 1. Marungapuri 2.Vaiyampatti 3.Karur District 10 THANJAVUR 1.Thiruvonam 2.Sethubavachatram 3.Ammapettai 4.Thiruppanandal 11 THIRUVARUR 1.Madukkur 2.Kodavasal 3.Koradachery 4.Thiruthuraipoondi 5.Muthupettai

6.Kottur 7.Koothanallur (Urba)12 NAGAPATTINAM 1. Sirkali 2.Kollidam 3.Keelaiyur

13 MADURAI 1. Sedapatti 2.Kottampatti 14 THENI 1. Chinnamanur 2.Cumbam 3.Kadamalaikundu 4.Myladumparai 15 DINDIGUL 1. Natham16 RAMANATHAPURAM 1.Nainarkoil 2.Bogalur 3.Thirupullani 4.R.S. Mangalam 5.Kadaladi 17 SIVAGANGAI 1. S. Pudur 2.Kannangudi 18 THIRUNELVELI 1.Courtallam (Urban) 2.Kadayanallur (Urban) 3.Melaneelithanallur

138


UNIT III - DROUGHT & BACKWARDNESS Understanding and Defining Drought

The Concept of DroughtConceptual Definitions of DroughtOperational Definitions of DroughtDisciplinary Perspectives on Drought

The Concept of Drought

Drought is a normal, recurrent feature of climate, although many erroneously consider it a rare and random event. Drought is a temporary aberration; it differs from aridity, which is restricted to low rainfall regions and is a permanent feature of climate.

Drought is an insidious hazard of nature. it originates from a deficiency of precipitation over an extended period of time, usually a season or more. This deficiency results in a water shortage for some activity, group, or environmental sector. Drought should be considered relative to some long-term average condition of balance between precipitation and evapotranspiration (i.e., evaporation + transpiration) in a particular area, a condition often perceived as “normal”. It is also related to the timing (i.e., principal season of occurrence, delays in the start of the rainy season, occurrence of rains in relation to principal crop growth stages) and the effectiveness (i.e., rainfall intensity, number of rainfall events) of the rains. Other climatic factors such as high temperature, high wind, and low relative humidity are often associated with it in many regions of the world and can significantly aggravate its severity.

Drought should not be viewed as merely a physical phenomenon or natural event. Its impacts on society result from the interplay between a natural event (less precipitation than expected resulting from natural climatic variability) and the demand people place on water supply. Human beings often exacerbate the impact of drought. Recent droughts in both developing and developed countries and the resulting economic and environmental impacts and personal hardships have underscored the vulnerability of all societies to this “natural” hazard.There are two main kinds of drought definitions: conceptual and operational.

Conceptual Definitions of DroughtConceptual definitions, formulated in general terms, help people understand the concept of drought. For example: Drought is a protracted period of deficient precipitation resulting in extensive damage to crops, resulting in loss of yield.

Conceptual definitions may also be important in establishing drought policy. For example, Australian drought policy incorporates an understanding of normal climate variability into its definition of drought. The country provides financial assistance to farmers only under “exceptional drought circumstances,” when drought conditions are beyond those that could be considered part of normal risk management. Declarations of exceptional drought are based on science-driven assessments. Previously, when drought was less well defined from a policy standpoint and less well understood by farmers, some farmers in the semiarid Australian climate claimed drought assistance every few years.

138


Operational Definitions of DroughtOperational definitions help people identify the beginning, end, and degree of severity of a drought. To determine the beginning of drought, operational definitions specify the degree of departure from the average of precipitation or some other climatic variable over some time period. This is usually done by comparing the current situation to the historical average, often based on a 30-year period of record. The threshold identified as the beginning of a drought (e.g., 75% of average precipitation over a specified time period) is usually established somewhat arbitrarily, rather than on the basis of its precise relationship to specific impacts.

An operational definition for agriculture might compare daily precipitation values to evapotranspiration rates to determine the rate of soil moisture depletion, then express these relationships in terms of drought effects on plant behavior (i.e., growth and yield) at various stages of crop development. A definition such as this one could be used in an operational assessment of drought severity and impacts by tracking meteorological variables, soil moisture, and crop conditions during the growing season, continually reevaluating the potential impact of these conditions on final yield. Operational definitions can also be used to analyze drought frequency, severity, and duration for a given historical period. Such definitions, however, require weather data on hourly, daily, monthly, or other time scales and, possibly, impact data (e.g., crop yield), depending on the nature of the definition being applied. Developing a climatology of drought for a region provides a greater understanding of its characteristics and the probability of recurrence at various levels of severity. Information of this type is extremely beneficial in the development of response and mitigation strategies and preparedness plans.

Disciplinary Perspectives on Drought:

Meteorological, Hydrological, Agricultural and Socioeconomic

Meteorological DroughtMeteorological drought is defined usually on the basis of the degree of dryness (in comparison to some “normal” or average amount) and the duration of the dry period. Definitions of meteorological drought must be considered as region specific since the atmospheric conditions that result in deficiencies of precipitation are highly variable from region to region. For example, some definitions of meteorological drought identify periods of drought on the basis of the number of days with precipitation less than some specified threshold. This measure is only appropriate for regions characterized by a year-round precipitation regime such as a tropical rainforest, humid subtropical climate, or humid mid-latitude climate Agricultural DroughtAgricultural drought links various characteristics of meteorological (or hydrological) drought to agricultural impacts, focusing on precipitation shortages, differences between actual and potential evapotranspiration, soil water deficits, reduced ground water or reservoir levels, and so forth. Plant water demand depends on prevailing weather conditions, biological characteristics of the specific plant, its stage of growth, and the physical and biological properties of the soil. A good definition of agricultural drought should be able to account for the variable susceptibility of crops during different stages of crop development, from emergence to maturity. Deficient topsoil moisture at planting

138


may hinder germination, leading to low plant populations per hectare and a reduction of final yield. However, if topsoil moisture is sufficient for early growth requirements, deficiencies in subsoil moisture at this early stage may not affect final yield if subsoil moisture is replenished as the growing season progresses or if rainfall meets plant water needs.

Hydrological Drought

Hydrological drought is associated with the effects of periods of precipitation (including snowfall) shortfalls on surface or subsurface water supply (i.e. stream flow, reservoir and lake levels, ground water). The frequency and severity of hydrological drought is often defined on a watershed or river basin scale. Although all droughts originate with a deficiency of precipitation, hydrologists are more concerned with how this deficiency plays out through the hydrologic system. Hydrological droughts are usually out of phase with or lag the occurrence of meteorological and agricultural droughts. It takes longer for precipitation deficiencies to show up in components of the hydrological system such as soil moisture, stream flow, and ground water and reservoir levels. As a result, these impacts are out of phase with impacts in other economic sectors. For example, a precipitation deficiency may result in a rapid depletion of soil moisture that is almost immediately discernible to agriculturalists, but the impact of this deficiency on reservoir levels may not affect hydroelectric power production or recreational uses for many months. Also, water in hydrologic storage systems (e.g., reservoirs, rivers) is often used for multiple and competing purposes (e.g., flood control, irrigation, recreation, navigation, hydropower, wildlife habitat), further complicating the sequence and quantification of impacts. Competition for water in these storage systems escalates during drought and conflicts between water users increase significantly.

Hydrological Drought and Land Use

Although climate is a primary contributor to hydrological drought, other factors such as changes in land use (e.g., deforestation), land degradation, and the construction of dams all affect the hydrological characteristics of the basin. Because regions are interconnected by hydrologic systems, the impact of meteorological drought may extend well beyond the borders of the precipitation-deficient area. For example, meteorological drought may severely affect portions of the northern Rocky Mountains and northern Great Plains region of the United States. However, since the Missouri River and its tributaries drain this region to the south, there may be significant hydrologic impacts downstream. Similarly, changes in land use upstream may alter hydrologic characteristics such as infiltration and runoff rates, resulting in more variable streamflow and a higher incidence of hydrologic drought downstream. Bangladesh, for example, has shown an increased frequency of water shortages in recent years because land use changes have occurred within the country and in neighboring countries. Land use change is one of the ways human actions alter the frequency of water shortage even when no change in the frequency of meteorological drought has been observed.

138


Dimensions of Drought

Sequence of Drought Impacts

The sequence of impacts associated with meteorological, agricultural, and hydrological drought further emphasizes their differences. When drought begins, the agricultural sector is usually the first to be affected because of its heavy dependence on stored soil water. Soil water can be rapidly depleted during extended dry periods. If precipitation deficiencies continue, then people dependent on other sources of water will begin to feel the effects of the shortage. Those who rely on surface water (i.e., reservoirs and lakes) and subsurface water (i.e., ground water), for example, are usually the last to be affected. A short-term drought that persists for 3 to 6 months may have little impact on these sectors, depending on the characteristics of the hydrologic system and water use requirements.

When precipitation returns to normal and meteorological drought conditions have abated, the sequence is repeated for the recovery of surface and subsurface water supplies. Soil water reserves are replenished first, followed by streamflow, reservoirs and lakes, and ground water. Drought impacts may diminish rapidly in the agricultural sector because of its reliance on soil water, but linger for months or even years in other sectors dependent on stored surface or subsurface supplies. Ground water users, often the last to be affected by drought during its onset, may be last to experience a return to normal water levels. The length of the recovery period is a function of the intensity of the drought, its duration, and the quantity of precipitation received as the episode terminates.

138


Socioeconomic Drought

Socioeconomic definitions of drought associate the supply and demand of some economic good with elements of meteorological, hydrological, and agricultural drought. It differs from the aforementioned types of drought because its occurrence depends on the time and space processes of supply and demand to identify or classify droughts. The supply of many economic goods, such as water, forage, food grains, fish, and hydroelectric power, depends on weather. Because of the natural variability of climate, water supply is ample in some years but unable to meet human and environmental needs in other years. Socioeconomic drought occurs when the demand for an economic good exceeds supply as a result of a weather-related shortfall in water supply. For example, in Uruguay in 1988–89, drought resulted in significantly reduced hydroelectric power production because power plants were dependent on stream flow rather than storage for power generation. Reducing hydroelectric power production required the government to convert to more expensive (imported) petroleum and stringent energy conservation measures to meet the nation’s power needs.

In most instances, the demand for economic goods is increasing as a result of increasing population and per capita consumption. Supply may also increase because of improved production efficiency, technology, or the construction of reservoirs that increase surface water storage capacity. If both supply and demand are increasing, the critical factor is the relative rate of change. Is demand increasing more rapidly than supply? If so, vulnerability and the incidence of drought may increase in the future as supply and demand trends converge.

UNIT III - DROUGHT II

A drought is defined as an extended period of abnormally dry weather that causes water shortages and crop damage. A drought starts when total rainfall is well below average for several months. Other signs of drought include: unusually low river flows, low ground water and reservoir levels, very dry soil, reduced crop yields or even crop failure, and algae blooms in reservoirs and lakes. Groundwater is not replenished because not enough rain is falling to wet the soil's entire surface area and to be absorbed properly.

Definition of DroughtA drought is a period of time when there is not enough water to support agricultural, urban, human, or environmental water needs. A drought usually refers to an extended period of below-normal rainfall, but can also be caused by drying bores or lakes, or anything that reduces the amount of liquid water available. Although what is considered "normal" varies from one region to another, drought is a recurring feature of nearly all the world's climatic regions. The effects of drought vary greatly, depending on agricultural, urban and environmental water needs. Water companies, farmers, and ranchers are those that suffer the worst as a result of drought.Conceptually, there are three main types of drought:

138


Types of Drought Meteorological drought is brought about when there is a prolonged period with less

than average precipitation. Meteorological drought usually precedes the other kinds of drought.

Agricultural drought is brought about when there is insufficient moisture for crop or range production. This condition can arise, even in times of average precipitation, owing to soil conditions or agricultural techniques.

Hydrological drought is brought about when the water reserves available in sources such as aquifers, lakes, and reservoirs falls below the statistical average. This condition can arise, even in times of average (or above average) precipitation, when increased usage of water diminishes the reserves.

Drought conditions lead to increased growth of algae in lakes, ponds and other slow-moving bodies of water. The water is no longer a safe place for fish and other aquatic life. Animals that drink from the rivers or streams can become sick and die; swimmers in affected waters may become ill. The ecology of an area may be affected by the drying of wetlands, with wading birds dying out. Crop production will be lower than usual; trees may die. Wildfires spring up; lack of irrigation can lead to famine and disease.

Sociological consequences of drought range from social unrest to relocation of populations to war.

Consequences of DroughtPeriods of drought can have significant environmental, economic and social consequences. The most common consequences are:

Wildfires (called Bushfires) Ground drag and Desertification. Loss of agricultural production Disease Thirst Famine due to lack of water for irrigation Social unrest Migration or relocation of those impacted War for water and foods.

The effect varies according to vulnerability. For example, subsistence farmers are more likely to migrate during drought because they do not have alternative food sources. Areas with populations that depend on subsistence farming as a major food source are more vulnerable to drought-triggered famine. Drought is rarely if ever the sole cause of famine; socio-political factors such as extreme widespread poverty play a major role.

Drought can also reduce water quality, because lower water flows reduce dilution of pollutants and increase contamination of remaining water sources in that

Main mitigation strategiesThe main mitigation strategies are as follows-1. Drought monitoring It is a continuous observation of rainfall situation and comparison with the existing water needs of a particular sector of a society.

138


2. Water supply conservationWe can conserve water through Rain Water Harvesting which can be used for agricultural purposes.3. Land useCrops which needs less water should be grown in a drought prone area.4. Livelihood planningA section of a society which is least affected by the droughts should be advised to live there.

Drought in India-1900250,000 to 3.25 million people died from drought, starvation and disease.Drought in Northwest China -1928-30Famine resulted in over 3 million deaths.Drought in Sichuan Province, China -1936This was the worst drought in the modern history of the area. 34 million farmers were displaced and 25 million people starved

Planning Commission’s list of 100 backward districts for RSVY Program

Name of state Name of district

Andhra Pradesh Adilabad Warangal Chittor Mahbubnagar Vizianagaram

Chhattisgarh Bastar Dantewada Kankar Bilaspur

Gujarat Dangs Dohad Panchmahals

Haryana Sirsa

Jharkhand Lohardagga* Gumla* Simdega Saraikela West Singhbhum* Goddha

Karnataka Gulburga Bidar Chitradurga Davangere

Kerala Palakkad Waynad

Madhya Pradesh Mandla* Barwani West Nimar Seoni* Shahdol Umaria Balaghat* Satna Siddhi

Maharashtra Gadchiroli* Bhandara Gondia Chandrapur Hingoli Nanded* DhuleNandurbar Ahmednagar

Punjab Hoshiarpur

Rajasthan Banswara Dungarpur Jhalawar

Tamil Nadu Tiruvannamalai Dindigul Cuddalore Naggapattinam Sivgangai

Uttar Pradesh Sonbhadra Rae Bareli* Unnao* Sitapur* Hardoi* Banda ChitrakootFatehpur* Barabanki* Mirzapur Gorakhpur Kushinagar Lalitpur*Jaunpur Hamirpur* Jalaun* Mahoba Kaushambi Azamgarh Pratapgarh*

West Bengal Purulia 24 South Parganas Jalpaiguri West Midnapur South DinajpurBankura North Dinajpur Birbhum

Assam Kokrajhar North Lakhimpur Karbi Anglong Dhemaji North Cachar Hills

138


Arunachal Pradesh

Upper Subansiri

Himachal Pradesh

Chamba Sirmaur

Jammu and kashmir

Doda Kupwara Poonch

Manipur Tamenlong

Meghalaya West Khat Hills

Mizoram Lawngtlai

Nagaland Mon

Sikkim North Sikkim

Tripura Dhalai

Uttaranchal Champavat Tehri Garhwal Chamoli

138


UNIT III - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA - MINISTRY OF INDUSTRYStatement on Industrial Policy

Policy Objectives Industrial policy should address the vision of our nation i.e. Rapid agricultural and industrial development of our country, Rapid expansion of opportunities for gainful employment, Progressive reduction of social and economic disparities, Removal of poverty and attainment of self-reliance

In 1954, immediately after Independence, Government introduced the Industrial Policy Resolution. This outlined the approach to industrial growth and development. After the adoption of the Constitution increase in production and ensuring its equitable distribution. After the adoption of the Constitution and the socio-economic goals, the Industrial Policy was comprehensively revised and adopted in 1956. To meet new challenges, from time, it was modified through statements in 1973, 1977 and 1980.

The Industrial Policy Resolution of 1948 was followed by the Industrial Policy Resolution of 1956 which had as its objective the acceleration of the rate of economic growth and the speeding up of industrialization as a means of achieving a socialist pattern of society. In 1956, capital was scarce and the base of entrepreneurship not strong enough. Hence, the 1956 Industrial policy Resolution gave primacy to the role of the State to assume a predominant and direct responsibility for industrial development.

The Industrial Policy Statement of 1973, inter alia, identified high priority industries where investment from large industrial houses and foreign companies would be permitted. The Industrial Policy Statement of 1977 laid emphasis on decentralization and on the role of small scale, tiny and cottage industries.

A number of policy and procedural changes were introduced in 1985 and 1986 under the leadership of Shri Rajiv Gandhi aimed at increasing productivity, reducing costs and improving quality. The accent was on opening the domestic market to increased competition and readying our industry to stand on its own in the face of international competition. The public sector was freed from a number of constraints and given a larger measure of autonomy.

Subjects Covered under the industrial policyGovernment has decided to take a series of initiatives in respect of the policies relating to the following areas. A. Industrial Licensing. B. Foreign Investment. C. Foreign Technology Agreements. D. Public Sector Policy. E. MRTP Act. A package for the Small and Tiny Sectors of industry is being announced separately.

138


A. Industrial Licensing Policy Industrial Licensing is governed by the Industries (Development & Regulation) Act, 1951. The Industrial Policy Resolution of 1956 identified the following three categories of industries: those that would be reserved for development in the public sector, those that would be permitted for development through private enterprise with or without State participation, and those in which investment initiatives would ordinarily emanate from private entrepreneurs. Over the years, keeping in view the changing industrial scene in the country, the policy has undergone modifications. Industrial licensing policy and procedures have also been liberalized from time to time. A full realization of the industrial potential of the country calls for a continuation of this process of change.

B. Foreign Investment While freeing Indian industry from official controls, opportunities for promoting foreign investment in India should also be fully exploited. In view of the significant development of India’s industrial economy in the last 40 years, the general resilience, size and level of sophistication achieved, and the significant changes that have also taken place in the world industrial economy, the relationship between domestic and foreign industry needs to be much more dynamic than it has been in terms of both technology and investment. Foreign investment would bring attendant advantages of technology transfer, marketing expertise, introduction of modern managerial techniques and new possibilities for promotion of exports. This is particularly necessary in the changing global scenario of industrial and economic co-operation marked by mobility of capital. The Government will, therefore, welcome foreign investment which is in the interest of the country’s industrial development.

C. Foreign Technology Agreements There is a great need for promoting an industrial environment where the acquisition of technological capability receives priority. In the fast changing world of technology the relationship between the suppliers and users of technology must be a continuous one. Such a relationship becomes difficult to achieve when the approval process includes unnecessary governmental interference on a case to case basis involving endemic delays and fostering uncertainty. The Indian entrepreneur has now come of age so that he no longer needs such bureaucratic clearance of his commercial technology relationships with foreign technology suppliers. Indian industry can scarcely be competitive with the rest of the world if it is to operate within such a regulatory environment.

D. Public Sector Policy The public sector has been central to philosophy of development. In the persuit of our development objectives, public ownership and control in critical sectors of the economy has played an important role in preventing the concentration of economic power, reducing regional disparities and ensuring that planned development serves the common goods.

It is time therefore that the Government adopt a new approach to public enterprises. There must be a great commitment to the support of public enterprises which are essential for the operation of the industrial economy. Measures must be taken to make these enterprises more growth oriented and technically dynamic. Units which may be faltering at present but are potentially viable must be structured and given a new lease of

138


life. The priority areas for growth of public enterprises in the future will be the followings: Essential infrastructure goods and services. Exploration and exploitation of oil and mineral resources. Technology development and building of manufacturing capabilities in areas which

are crucial in the long term development of the economy and where private sector investment is inadequate Manufacture of products where strategic considerations predominate such as defence equipment At the same time the public sector will not be barred from entering areas not specifically reserved for it.

E. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act (MRTP Act) The principal objectives sought to be achieved through the MRTP Act are as follows:- i. Prevention of concentration of economic power to the common detriment, control of monopolies. ii. Prohibition of monopolies and restrictive and unfair trade practices.

List of industries reserved for the public sector1. Arms and ammunition and allied items of defense equipment, Defense aircraft and

warships. 2. Atomic energy. 3. Coal and lignite. 4. Mineral oils. 5. Mining of iron ore, manganese ore, chrome ore, gypsum sulphur, gold and diamond. 6. Mining of copper, lead, zinc, tin, molybdenum and wolfram. 7. Minerals specified in the Schedule to the Atomic Energy (Control of Production and

Use) Order, 1953. 8. Railway transport.

Coverage of ILP A. Industrial Licensing Policy Procedural Consequences B. Foreign Investment C. Foreign Technology Agreements D. Public Sector E. MRTP Act

138


UNIT III - INDUSTRIAL ESTATES

The ConceptThe term "industrial estate" is often used interchangeably with industrial district,industrial park, industrial zone, special economic zone, eco-zone etc. An Industrial Estate (IE) is a self contained geographical area with high quality infrastructure facilities, whichhouse businesses of an industrial nature. An industrial estate is administered or managed by a single authority that has a defined jurisdiction with respect to tenant companies. Theauthority makes provisions for operation and management; enforcing restrictions on tenants and planning with respect to lot sizes, access and utilities. The IEs offer industrial, residential and commercial areas with developed plots/ pre-built factories, power, telecom, water, sanitation and other civic amenities such as hospital, sewerage and drainage facilities, security etc. The main targets of Industrial Estates are the high value adding small and medium scale industries, which do not have the wherewithal to invest in developing their own basic infrastructure facilities, but have the capacity to pay for the services provided to them. Hence, Industrial Estates are regions where infrastructure facilities are provided for and thus a conducive environment is created to attract small and medium scale industries. Advantages of Industrial Estates Industrial Estates can positively influence the socio-economic development and industrialization of the region by:

• Attracting investments• Generating employment• Leveraging on raw material sources, skilled manpower resources, proximity to end-use markets, etc.• Adding to and improving social infrastructure in terms of healthcare and educational facilities Industrial Estates have led to the development of large urban regions especially in the States wherein large-scale city/ town development has taken place. Bharuch, Vapi and Valsad in Gujarat and Nasik and Nagpur in Maharashtra are examples of such developments.

Types of Industrial EstatesIndustrial Estates can be developed either as a:• General Industrial Park (GIP) which caters to all types of industries, an example of the GIP being the Industrial Model Township at Manesar (Haryana) which has facilities to house different types of industries like auto and auto components, high precision industries, textiles, pharmaceuticals, software etc. or• Special Industrial Park (SIP) which focuses on a specific industry like software, textiles, plastics, etc. The Software Technology Park at Whitefield in Bangalore is one such example

Industrial Estates – Issues InvolvedLocationOne of the most important factors contributing to the success of an industrial estate is its location. The main criteria that should be considered while deciding the location of an Industrial Estate are as follows:

138


Natural competitive advantage of the region Potential for forming industrial clusters in the region to ensure the economic viability of Industrial EstatesPresence of transportation nodes in the region in the form of airports, railway terminals and road networks both from raw material sources and to end-use markets Presence of technological research institutions and training facilities such as universities, colleges, etc., which would add value to the growth of these EstatesFiscal incentives applicable for setting up the Industrial Estate in a particular regionProximity of the region to important marketsProximity of the region to important raw material sources Connectivity of the region to other regions The formation of industrial clusters would in turn, make the Industrial Estates commercially viable. As is evident, determination of potential location of an industrial estate requires a comprehensive and scientific analysis.

Configuration and DesignUsually, an industrial estate is configured around three zones- the industrial, the residential and the commercial zones.The industrial zone encompasses industrial units catering to both domestic and export marketsThe residential zone provides for housing facilities, and The commercial zone comprises of support facilities like banks, post office, hospital, shopping centers, clubs etc. While designing an Industrial Estate, a mix of industrial, residential and commercial zones must be kept in mind.

Government’s Role and PoliciesPromotion of industrial parks was given a boost by the Government of India towards the end of the first five-year plan (1952-57) when the ‘Industrial Estates Development Program’ was initiated. The role of the Central Government in the establishment andupkeep of Industrial Estates in India has been mainly that of laying down the guidelines for the State Governments. The responsibility for the selection of sites, development of areas, construction of infrastructure facilities etc., has been the mandate of the StateGovernments.

Private Sector ParticipationPrivate sector participation is being encouraged by all the States to ensure a more commercial approach to the entire exercise of setting up and managing Industrial Estates. Private sector participation would lead to: A better choice of location, design and infrastructure facilities Better collection of revenues Professional and innovative management Greater accountability and responsibility Fund mobilization to bridge the infrastructure investment gaps

Institutional Arrangements with Private ParticipationSo far the Government has been the sole promoting, investing, implementing and operating agency in this sector. Participation of the private sector requires changes in institutional arrangements. This would lead to increase in the number of players andwould encompass:

138


• The State Government• A promotional agency set up by the State like the State Industrial Development Corporation (SIDC) or a State Industrial Estate Promotional Authority (SIEPA)• The Private Sector• Financial Institutions

Land AcquisitionLand acquisition is considered to be a major hindrance in setting up any industrial estate on account of two main reasons:• Inability to acquire contiguous land due to reluctance of some owners to sell the land• Problems in fixing the compensation price of the land

SustainabilityThe quality of Infrastructure of the Industrial Estates is India is deteriorating, thereby defeating the purpose of their creation. Sustainability of the Industrial Estates is therefore becoming an important issue, with the State Government finding it difficult to maintain the infrastructure facilities in these estates. Deterioration of infrastructure facilities affects the performance of the industrial units, which in turn affects the revenue source for the estates. Hence, a vicious cycle is created, leading to the failure of the industrial park.

Fiscal Concessions

UNIT III - INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IN TAMILNADU

138


STATE INDUSTRIES PROMOTION CORPORATION OF TAMIL NADU LIMITED

SIPCOTState Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited (SIPCOT) was established in the year 1971, under the Companies Act. The main objective of the Corporation is to promote medium and large scale Industries in Tamil Nadu. SIPCOT’s objectives and activities:(a) Developing, Marketing and Maintaining Industrial Complexes / Parks and Growth Centers;(b) Implementing Infrastructure Development Schemes.

The key areas of TANSIDCO’s activities are as follows: Development of industrial estates with infrastructure facilities and provision of work sheds & developed plots. Raw Materials Supply Scheme Marketing Assistance Scheme Export Assistance Scheme Guidance to Entrepreneurs

138


The details of area acquired, developed and sold upto 31.3.04 are given below -

In acresTotal area acquired 21,343.73Total allottable area 15957.29Total area allotted 6,764.26Number of units allotted 1,131Area Development expenditure incurred so far Rs.31645 lakhs.

I. SIPCOT Industrial Complex / Parks/Growth Centers:The Corporation has developed 17 Complexes/Parks/ Growth Centersin 12 districts in Tamilnadu. The locations and area of the complexes are given below:

S.N Location of complex/park/growth centre

Name of District Area in acres

1. Ranipet Vellore 1663.97

2. Hosur Krishnagiri 2410.713. Pudukottai Pudukottai 421.10

4. Manamadurai Sivagangai 492.07

5. Gummidipoondi Tiruvellore 1257.08

6. Thoothukudi Thoothukudi 2707.86

7 Cuddalore Cuddalore Industrial Park

Cuddalore 712.271266.00

8 Irungattukottai Kanchipuram 1843.68

9 Sriperumbudur Kanchipuram 2469.00

10 Siruseri (Information Technology Park) Kanchipuram 980.00

11 Nilakottai Dindigul 386.21

12 Bargur Krishnagiri 1348.00

13 Export Promotion Industrial Park, Gummidipoondi.

Tiruvellore 224.11

14 Perundurai Erode 2751.98

15 Gangaikondan Tirunelveli 2038.33

16 Oragadam Kanchipuram 2043.00

17 Cheyyar Thiruvannamalai 631.00

138


II. Infrastructure Development Activities:SIPCOT is implementing the following special infrastructure development schemes:

(A)Govt.of India Schemes:Food Park, Nilakottai, Dindigul district:SIPCOT is promoting a Food Park in the SIPCOT Industrial Complex at Nilakottai over an extent of 100 acres at a cost of Rs.13.00 crores.

Apparel Park-Irungattukottai, Kanchipuram district:SIPCOT is developing an Apparel Park in association with Apparel and Handlooms Exporters Association (AHEA). The cost of the project is Rs.24.00 crores..

Development of Coir Cluster and Leather Cluster:SIPCOT will facilitate developement of critical infrastructure for leather and coir industries by combining the funds of the Government of India and the beneficiary bodies under Public-Private partnership. The project proposals for development of the Leather Cluster at Ambur and Coir cluster covering Salem and Dharmapuri districts have been forwarded to Govt.of India for approval.

(b)Govt.of Tamilnadu Schems:Eco-Enterprises Park, Nilakottai, Dindigul district.SIPCOT has set apart 50 acres in the SIPCOT Industrial Complex at Nilakottai to establish an Eco Enterprises Park at a cost of Rs.5.00 crores. The Eco Enterprises Park is conceived to promote industries in the field of herbal, horticulture, bio - technology and renewable sources of energy.

138


Integrated Knowledge Industry Township at Siruseri Information Technology ParkIn line with announcement made in the budget 2003-04, SIPCOT had identified M/s Lee Kim Tah Holdings Ltd, a consortium of Singapore Companies to develop an Integrated Knowledge Town Ship within the Information Technology Park (ITP) Siruseri near Chennai.

Hazarduous Industrial Waste Disposal Project at Melakottaiyur A suitable site of 68.92.0 hectares has been identified in Melakottiyur, Kanchipuram district to dispose Hazarduous Industrial Waste.

Existing Industrial Estate Up gradation:SIPCOT will improve the infrastructure in the select industrial estates which have high potential for investors, involving the Industries Association in the management of the estates on a participatory basis.

Economic Reforms - Tamilnadu Abolition of industrial licensing, except in few ‘strategic’ sectors Foreign Direct Investment up to 100% allowed in most sectors under the

‘Automatic Route’ Rationalization of both indirect and direct tax structure Portfolio investments by foreign institutional investors allowed in both equity and debt markets Rupee made fully convertible on trade account Removal of quantitative restrictions on imports Financial sector reforms and decontrol of interest rates The Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act enacted in 2003

Institutions Associated with Industrial Development in TamilnaduDirector of Industries & Commerce

Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005Electronics Corporation of Tamilnadu Limited (ELCOT)

692, MHU Complex, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035

Industrial & Technical Consultancy Organisation of Tamilnadu Ltd. (ITCOT)

50-A, Greams Road,Chennai - 600 006

Tamilnadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd. (SIDCO)

SIDCO Office Complex, Paulwels Road, Kathipara Junction, Chennai - 600 016 State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamilnadu Limited (SIPCOT)

19-A, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Salai, Chennai - 600 008

138


Small Industries Service Institute (SISI)

65/1, GST Road, Chennai - 600 032 Tamilnadu Adi Dravida Housing Development Corporation Ltd. (TAHDCO)

TNHB Shopping Complex, Thirumangalam, Chennai - 600 101Tamilnadu Corporation for Development of Women Ltd.

No.100, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032

Tamilnadu Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (TIDCO)

19-A, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Salai, Chennai - 600 008

Tamilnadu Industrial Guidance and Export Promotion Bureau (Guidance)

19-A, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Salai, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

UNIT III - REGIONAL ANALYSIS / REGIONAL GROWTH THEORIES

Economic theories talk about growth in terms of 1. increase of income (total income) and / or2. increase of per capita incomeTherefore regional growth implies an increase in the total income and/or per capita income of a region. Since the growth of income is always the result of the growth of the use of factors (e.g. land, labor, capital, raw material) of production, regional growth should imply a better use of the factors of production such as land, labor, capital etc. of the region.

In addition to these factors, a region can also grow due to an increase in the level of demand for its commodities from the other regions within the country or outside the country.

Thus in regional analysis, growth of a region can result either from endogenous (within) factors or from exogenous (outside) factors or both. Some times growth may result from a right location of industries/services. Consequently there are theories of regional growth which attempt to explain the growth of a region in terms of 1. Endogenously induced process. e.g. Sector theory, stage theory2. Exogenously induced process e.g. Export base model3. Spatially induced process e.g. Growth pole, Central place

138


Endogenously Induced ProcessSector TheoryThe sector theory has its origin in the empirical observations made by Colin Clark, Simon Kuznets and others. It is based on the contribution of different sectors of economy at different levels of development. The sector theory places attention on structural changes taking place within an economy in contrast to the export base theory, which emphasizes the role of external relationships. According to sector theory, the process of economic development is accompanied by a shift in the employment pattern first from primary to secondary sector and later on to the tertiary sector. The explanation is based upon the different income elasticity for the products of

these sectors and the relative differences in the average earnings per worker in different sectors. The theory is empirically verifiable in terms of cross section and historical trends in different countries or major regions within them.

The sector theory with its emphasis on structural changes, differences in elasticity of demand and productivity differences among sectors throws light on some important elements in the growth of an economy. It provides a useful frame of reference for aggregating data for comparative studies. However, the theory is criticized. The main weakness of the sector theory is its neglect / ignorance of the role of external factors in regional development. Reliance on aggregation of data at a very broad level also has its limitations.

Stage TheoryAnother approach to understand regional development is provided by the stage theory, which visualizes economic development as a process of transformation

Demand for a product is proportionate to its price. A small change in the price may lead to a greater change in demand. In such cases the demand is called elastic. On the other hand, even a big change in price may not cause any change in demand. Such demand is called inelastic e.g. salt.When income increases, demand for secondary & tertiary products and services increase.

3. Traditional Society Pre-Newtonian science & technology

Political power – landed aristocracy4. Pre conditions for take off

New learning or Renaissance New MonarchyNew Religion or ReformationBuilding up to social over head capitalTechnological revolution in agricultureReactive nationalism (against foreign domination)

3. Take off stage Rise in the rate of productive investment Development of one or two manufacturing sectorEmergence of institutional frame work

4. Drive to maturityChange in the working force-skilled urbanizationChange in the qualities of entrepreneurs

5. Age of High Mass consumptionMovement to suburbsUse of automobiles Use of household goods & gadgets

138


through successive stages. Proponents of this theory believe in a regular or normal sequence of stages of growth. Most famous of the stage theory is that of Rostow, who has distinguished five stages of growth on the basis of development experience of a number of countries i.e., the traditional society, the pre-conditions of take-off, the take-off, the derive to maturity and the age of high mass consumption.

Hoover and Fisher have applied the stage theory in the regional setting. They have visualized the transformation of a region from an agricultural to an industrial economy through the following successive stages of development: subsistence agriculture; local specialization based on trade; cash-crop farming; mining and manufacturing; diversified manufacturing; and specialization in tertiary industries for export. They observe that a non-industrialized region may reach a limit to its growth and start decaying, suggesting that if a region is to continue to increase its per capita income it must eventually industrialize.

Exogenously induced process

Export Base Model

Export Base Model (EBM) emphasis the exogenous factors in regional growth. It points out that regions are not closed areas but are open to the flows of trade.Export Base Model (EBM) indicates that growth of a region depends upon the growth of the regional export base; Regional export depends on the expansion in demand external to the region. As a consequence of export sales, income in the region increases leading to an expansion of residentiary activities, development of external economics and further regional growth.

The export base theory, initially developed in the context of the growth of urban areas was used to explain the process of regional economic development by D.C North. He looks at the region as a territory developing around a common export base. He thinks that the growth of a region “is closely tied to the success of its exports and it may take place either as result of the improved position of existing exports relative to competing areas or as a result of the development of new exports.” Understanding the comparative advantage in producing goods and services in demand to the existing markets outside the region, which in turn attracts productive factors in a region facilitates the growth of a region.

The distinction between basic and non-basic activities is crucial to the theory of export base. The basic activities are those the product of which is intended for the export market, while the non-basic or residentiary activities are those which cater to the local market. The non-basic activities are regarded as depending upon the basic activities and the ratio of income or employment generated in the two types of

Export: to carry or send out of a country, as goods in commerce; a commodity which is or may be sent from one country to another in traffic.Invisible export: money spend by the tourists from abroad Visible export: goods sold by the traders abroad.

138


activities is taken as a multiplier. The expansion of the export base in response to increasing outside demand is seen as the principal factor determining the growth of income in a region through the multiplier effect on the residentiary activities.

Calculating Multiplier

The chief merit of the export base theory lies in the fact that it links the growth of a region with changes in demand in the other regions of the nation and the world.

Benefits:1. When a region specializes in the production of a few goods due to inter-regional trade and division of labor, it exports those commodities, which it produces cheaper, in exchange for what others can produce at a lower cost. It leads to increase in regional income, raises the level of output in the export sector and raises growth.2. Higher the level of income and output breaks the vicious cycle of poverty.3. When the export base is increasing, many entrepreneurs will enter into it; competition arises; it leads to lower the cost of production either by technological improvement or better use of the factors of production.4. As a consequence of the expansion of income received from outside, increased investment in residentiary activity will take place.5. Exports provide the basis for the importation of capital from outside.

However, in spite of its wide appeal the export base theory has been severely criticized on a number of accounts.

Firstly, as Tiebout points out “there is no reason to assume that exports are the sole or even the most important autonomous variable determining regional income. Such other items as business investment, government expenditure and the volume of residential construction may be just as autonomous with respect to regional income as are exports.

Secondly, the theory errs in ignoring the role of internal growth sequences and in treating the residentiary activities as purely passive. The development of the residentiary activities is itself an important determinant of a growth of a region. Thirdly, the volume of exports from a region is also the result of the income elasticity of demand. Although the export base theory may be able to explain the process of growth of small regions depending upon exports, the growth of large regions like Eastern U.P. cannot be explained without reference to endogenous factors operating in the region.

Calculating Multiplier m = Increase in total income in basic activities 10000 + non basic activities 20000

Increase in total income of basic activities 10000In a region, if the income in basic activities is increased by 10,000 units and this results in increase in income in non-basic activities by 20,000 units we have 10,000 + 20,000=30,000/10,000 = 3 Income multiplier = 3

138


In addition to the above three criticisms, another important criticism against EBM is, at times export base won’t lead to the growth of the regional economy.E.g. Additional income acquired through export may be frittered away on imported luxury goods. The businessmen who acquire such income may not invest in the same region. Sometimes export trade may lead to backwash effect in the underdeveloped regions.E.g. Bihar & Orissa they have a wide export base but not experienced growth When the exports are made to developed regions, it will lead to negative demonstration effect; and will affect the capital formation in the region.

Conclusion: Inter-regional trade opens new opportunities of specialization and development for the regions engaged in it. Export base model bring into use hither to unexploited natural resources and may free the regions from the limitations of their own domestic markets.

Input-Output AnalysisLeontief (1951) developed input-output model. It helps to understand and determine the interdependence of various sectors of the economy. It assumes that economy consists of a number of interacting industries i.e. the output of one industry may used as an input for other industry

Input Output- Some thing which is brought for the enterprise - Some thing which is sold by it.- Input-that which is procured - Output-that which is produced- Represents the expenditure of the firm - Receipt part of the firm- Sum of the money values of inputs is - Sum of the money values of the the total cost output is the total revenue

Friedman’s Synthesis of Theories of Regional DevelopmentIn spite of the vast literature that has come out in the last twenty-five years, our knowledge of the spatial incidence of economic growth remains limited. We are as yet nowhere near a complete theory of regional development. However, the existing literature has led to certain important generalizations, which have met with wide acceptance. Friedman has presented a synthesis of the generalizations concerning regional economic development in terms of the following eight propositions:1. Regional economy is open to the outside world and subject to external influence.2. Regional economic growth is externally induced.3. Successful translation of export sector growth into growth of the residentiary sector depends of the socio-political structure of the region and the local distribution of income and patterns of expenditure.4. Local leadership is decisive for successful adaptation to external change. Yet the quality of leadership depends on the region’s past development experience.5. Regional economic growth may be regarded, in part, as a problem in the location of firms.6. Economic growth tends to occur in the matrix of urban regions. It is through this matrix that the evolving space economy is organized.7. Flows of labor tend to exert an equilibrating force on the welfare effects of economic growth. But contradictory results may be obtained.

138


8. Where economic growth is sustained over long periods, its incidence works towards a progressive integration of the space economy.

UNIT III - THEORIES OF INDUSTRIAL LOCATION & SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT

Theories of industrial location attempts to explain 1) Why the industries are located in a particular place?2) Why the locations are shifted?3) What can be the best location for a particular industry?Answers to these questions provide guidelines for spatial development.Theories of industrial location can be classified into three categories.1. Those which emphasis cost factors2. Those which emphasis demand 3. Those which are concerned with locational interdependence

Least Cost Approach (Van Thunen & Alfred Weber)Van Thunen, (1826) a German Scholar, made the first attempt to develop a theory of location emphasizing cost factors. In his book ‘The Isolated State’, Thunen considered the problem of location of various forms of agricultural production in relation to markets. He concluded that location depends upon the value of the commodity in the market and cost of its transportation.

Van Thunen hypothesisHe explained how the space is organized through a workable model of the land use pattern. To explain his hypothesis He imagined an isolated state. A large town existed in the centre of the agricultural field, which had no counter magnets in its vicinity. The town drew its production from the plain, to which it supplied the manufactured products. The transport network in the region, roads & navigational canals was poor i.e. extremely poor transportation linkages. At a considerable distance, the plain ended in an uncultivated wilderness.The question that Van Thunen asked was: “How will the agriculture of the plain be arranged in such circumstances?”

138


Thunen’s answer was, “cultivation would be arranged in a series of concentric circles round the town, according to the cost of transportation of the commodity and the ratio in which its value stood to its bulk and weight. A series of concentric rings would tend to grow up around the city and a specific pattern of land-use would dominate within each ring.

Town Dairyfarming

GreenbV ege tables / HorticulturePulses/ cereals

Firewood

1) In the ring closest to the city, those items that could bear transportation least of all, or on which transportation charges would be out of proportion to the market price, would be produced. E.g. items perishable in nature, items less in weight, dairy farming, horticulture crops, vegetables etc.2) More distant belts would specialize in products, which were more in weight and volume, but fetched higher prices in the market.

Alfred WeberThe first comprehensive effort at developing a theory of location was made by Alfred Weber (1909). Weber also emphasized the cost factors (least cost approach) to the theory of industrial location.A/c to Weber, location depends upona) Raw materialsb) Cost of transporting raw materialsc) Cost of labord) Agglomeration & deglomeration tendenciesb,c,d are considered as a primary regional factors which influence the location of industries. Weber emphasis that the best location is the place where the production costs would be lowest.

Demand Approach:August Losch was the proponent of this approach. He criticized the least cost approach for omitting the demand can serve an important role in determining the location of industry. He further argued that the best location would be that which would command, the largest market area, since this would bring in the highest sales revenue. Point of largest sales should be the correct location; place of greatest profit is the right place.

WEBER AUGUST LOSCHLeast cost approach Profit maximizationIgnoring market Ignoring the raw material

138


Even though both the theories are one sided, August Losch approach helps us to understand the formation of hexagons, which in turn helps us to understand the Central Place Theory.

Suppose there is a farmer who produces bear over and above his requirements. If OP is the price at the brewery, which is at P, those living there will buy PQ bottles of bear. Further away, the price is higher by the amount of the freight, and the demand consequently shrinks. When the price costs are PF, the total price rises to OF and the demand shrinks to Zero. Thus PF will be the extreme sales radius for bear. By rotating the triangle PQF on PQ as an axis we obtain the demand cone, whose volume gives the total sales of the brewery at point P and thus denote the market area of the brewery.

It is possible that other farms may also produce surplus beer, which they would like to sell in the market. As long as profits are made, new breweries will continue to be established, each brewery having a circular market area.

As the number of breweries increases, the circular areas touch each other, but even now, the whole space is not covered and some area will remain unserved.

The only possibility by which the total area can be served is through overlapping circles.

138


Ultimately hexagons are formed. The hexagonal form is the most efficient one since among all the possibilities of utilizing the corners, the hexagon retains most of the advantages of the circle.Hexagonal arrangement ensures efficient division of space between a numbers of central places.

UNIT III - CENTRAL PLACE THEORYEssential Features

Many writers are mentioned for developing the Central Place Theory (CPT). Jefferson (1931), Christaller (1933), August Losch (1939 & 1954), Berry and Garrison (1958) Christaller again in 1966, Dacey (1966), and Berry (again 1967) are important names to be remembered. The most important names are of Christaller and Losch.

While Christaller constructed his system from the “Top to the Bottom”, Losch built his system starting from “Bottom to the top”. While Christaller takes the commodities with the largest market area first, then Losch first selected commodities with a smallest market area and then went on taking commodities with successfully large market areas.

Christaller’s Central Place Theory in a Hierarchy of SettlementsThese writers mentioned above attempted to derive in exact

terms a spatial differentiation of economic activity on a homogeneous plain on the basic of economic factors. These German writers developed hexagonal market areas based on the transport cost and different sizes of the urban settlements. Like Thunen and Weber of Germany, they were more concerned with the spatial aspects.

In the CPT of Christaller, centrality means importance. It is manifested by the quantity and quality of different services and functions provided by the settlement. It is defined as the functional importance of settlement of the central place. Functions determine the centrality of the centre and not the location.

Since all goods and services cannot be produced in any one region, the regions import and export to other regions. Movement of factors, transportation of goods and migration of people take place between regions and a network of movement develops. There are

138


some nodal points of advantage in this network, though nodes differ in sizes and importance thus a hierarchy of nodes and there are their zones of influence (also known as hinterland surfaces).

CPT is not based upon the actual pattern of settlements, but it a geographers dream about the ideal hierarchy as they would like to see and present it on a map.

Assumptions of Central place theory The Central place theory assumes certain situations related to settlements – hamlets, villages, homesteads and cities. These assumptions are:

(1) The Landscape is even with an even distribution of natural resources and an even spread of population – invariably assumed to be farmers. “People do the marketing in a circular area”.(2) The radius of the circle of the marketing i.e. ‘the extent of the market’ is the function of transport cost. The circles so overlap that the common areas of overlap provide hexagonal shapes, and all consumers and area are served by various centers.(3) Population is evenly distributed in all the directions and the movement of people in all the directions is unimpeded and involves equal unit transport cost.(4) All people are rational: they want to minimize cost (transport cost and the time cost of traveling in particular) and maximize gains.(5) All the consumers have the same purchasing power (6) Lower order functions are available at lower order places and higher order functions at higher order places, though higher order settlements have many lower order functions also. (7) The relationship between settlement nodes is orderly and not disorderly. There is a hierarchy of functions related to the hierarchy of settlements. In a small village there will be a rural post box and a delivery postman while in a big city most developed modern electronic facilities are available. In every field there are facilities ranging from the lowest to the highest order. (Primary school to institutes to specialize learning and research; village dispensary to specialized institutes of surgery / medical treatment; one counter bank to big banks using computers and exchanging of currency in the world). (8) Each lower or higher order service requires threshold population. A cinema hall will require a minimum film–viewing public to (say) 500 members per show. A threshold population and efficiency of transport system (Low transport cost) will sustain a facility.

Important Features of Central Place Theory(A). Settlements: Hierarchy: Centers: Centre of the Centers.The space in the earth is dotted with settlements, which have a hierarchy. There are farmstead, hamlet, small villages, bigger villages, small–intermediate–big towns, cities and metropolis (sum of them Miseropolis). They form the rural and urban areas.

Thus the settlement differs in sizes and distribution of population / functions and in each region there is a center of center place. These center places are themselves in a hierarchical order. Around a nucleus (town) there is crystallization of mass (mass includes population, function and activities).

(B). Functions, Central Functions and OrderingFacilities and functions are the goods and services available at a place. Primary sector provides agricultural goods, raw materials and food articles. There are manufactured goods (secondary sector) made available and services which make up the ‘tertiary sector:

138


schools hospitals, bank branches, whole sale establishments, retail shops, barber’s shop, post office are all services. There are lower and higher order services, e.g., primary school to international famous institutes of higher learning and research. Instance can be in multiplied in respect of all type of services.

Normally lower order centers will provide lower order functions and facilities. Higher order centers will provide higher order facilities. It can be said with fair amount of certainty that higher order functions will provide many, if not all, lower order functions and facilities also. Sometimes we can find higher order facility in a lower order center (a mission hospital with good medical facilities in a remote small town). Central places provide central functions. These are those goods and services, which are produced at a few locations in order to be used by many settlements, scattered over the place. Hence the central functions are un–ubiquitous in nature and the degree of importance of a function is supposed to vary inversely with the frequency of its occurrence. If one particular commodity is sold everywhere, there is no central place for the same.

The more developed country / region, the higher the percentage of contribution of the secondary and tertiary sectors to the national income. The same is true of the developed central places. Center places develop because of the central functions are provided by the central places. The central services overcome the disadvantages of the ‘friction of distance’.

Threshold population: Market Range: InteractionVarious types of the services can be ranked into higher and lower orders, depending on the demand threshold i.e., the minimum viable level of population and income required to support services.

Then there is the range of service area. There are outer limits of the market area for each service. This outer limit depend upon the (a) cost of transport and (b) distribution of centers These two factors (threshold & range) determine the number and size of the center places supplying each service and hence center places hierarchy develops.

One of the most important characteristics of a central function is that it generates spatial interactions, through the movement of men, materials and ideas between the center place and the complimentary region surrounding it. The rare the function, the higher the range of the interaction.

Each center has its complimentary area and from the center emanates the centrifugal or distributive functions and from the complimentary areas to the center gravitate centripetal activities or activities of collection.

Thus there is two way inter–dependence and interaction between the center and complimentary area. A continuous progress of centripetal and centrifugal interaction takes place between the spatially dispersed settlements and the nearest nodal centers containing bundles of different services and facilities. Advantage levels of the nodal points differ. Hierarchies of the centers and the services differ. All this difference determines the interactions and interdependence.

138


UNIT III - CENTRAL PLACE THEORY - II Walter Christaller (1933) Walter Christaller (1933) has discovered that there is some ordering principle governing the distribution of towns and cities, that is, settlements concerned with the provision of goods and services.

His theory is designated as the ‘theory of location of urban trades and institutions’ to be placed beside Van Thunen’s theory of the ’location of the agricultural production’ and Alfred Weber’s ‘theory of location of industries’

In the original formulation of the theory by Walter Christaller, he explained central place is the source of goods and services to the surroundings – beyond its own area. Implicit in the theory is the complementary relation of the two areas and the conditions governing the spatial distribution of central places and their hierarchical arrangement. The theory was formulated to provide answers to the questions why cities, towns, and villages are distributed as they are, and why there are the degrees of size. The theory foreshadowed by several previous German writers, especially Robert Gradmann, and by few others, but Christaller was the first to fortify the theory with extensive and detailed analysis.

Christaller claims that the theory is organically based on the “ The crystallization of mass around a nucleus is, in inorganic as well as organic nature, an elementary form of the order of things, which belong together – a centralistic order. This order is not only a human mode of thinking, existing in the human world of imagination and developed because people demand order; it in fact exists out of the inherent pattern of matter.”

According to Walter Christaller ‘ a central place is defined as a settlement providing services for the population of its hinter land (known as complementary region), supplying it with central goods and services (educational, leisure and cultural facilities) as well as those of retail and wholesale trade.

138


Central places vary in importance. Depending upon the central functions performed by them and the population served, they can be classified as higher order centers and lower order centers. Higher order centers stock a wide array of goods and services and serve a large population, lower order centers stock a smaller range goods and services and serve a smaller population.

Central PlacesBesides population, a settlement’s importance as a central place depends upon numerous factors. (1) The supply of goods to the population at surrounding areas, (2) Provision of resort amenities, (3) Nodes on transportation networks, (4) The provision of banking and commercial facilities, (5) The provision of educational and cultural facilities, and (6) Governmental and other administrative functions.

The growth of a central place is also dependant on numerous factors such as (1) the amount of support that is required for a particular function called threshold population, (2) Spatial competition, and (3) the chance of a particular central place for the location of new functions.

Central place theory is usually explained by using three concepts associated with it.1. Centrality2. Threshold3. Range of central good.

1. Centrality. The centrality of a settlement (urban centre) is defined as the ratio between the services provided and the local needs of its inhabitants. The increasing or decreasing centrality of a place depends on the extent to which it functions for the surrounding region. Christaller give a simple mathematical explanation. If the town has an aggregate importance of B, of which Bz represents the town’s population, then B – Bz = the surplus of importance for the surrounding region, and it is this, the magnitude of the surplus, that shows the degree to which the town is a central place.

How is it possible to measure the centrally of a place and its importance as such?

Christaller stated that centrality “ is equal to the relative importance of the place in regard to a region belonging to it”. He suggested that the best method of determining the importance of a place as a centre is, not by the size of the population, but by the number of telephone connections. Professor Edward Ullman suggested some, such as “the average number of customers required to support certain specialized functions in various regions,” and, “the excess of these functions over the normal requirement of the urban population.’ Another suggestion is the number of automobiles entering a town excluding those from the suburbs.

Other indicators- business turnovers of the shops- number of central functions such as whole sale and retail stores

138


- professional services located in a settlement

2. Threshold Threshold is the minimum sales volume needed to support a business or service; below this level it will not be profitable to supply a good or a service

3. Range of a central good/service Range of a central good/service delineates the market area of a central good/service. It is the maximum distance that consumers are willing to travel (Keeping in view the price of the good) to purchase the good. It we assume that travel is equally easy in all directions, the range of a central good will be a perfect circle round the central place.

As far as the spatial development plans / programs are concerned, central place theory is more understandable and more viable, if it is formulated in a series of simple concepts, such as the range of a good / service and of threshold. By using these concepts, the planners can visualize a hierarchical structure of central places to provide goods and services.

The assumptions adopted by Christaller to explain his theory are: the landscape is an even plain with an even distribution of natural resources and an even spread of population, producers and consumers, and The movement in every direction is unimpeded and involves equal unit cost.

Now let us assume a farmer selling his produce at point A as in the diagram. Other farmers are willing to travel distance ‘a’ to purchase from this farmer. Since we have assumed that travel is equally easy in all directions, the market area for the farmer at A is given by the circle with radius ‘a’. In time more producers may develop their own separate market areas as shown in the diagram. With the development of transportation and communications the market areas will expand and there will be an attempt to cover the maximum possible space. With circular market areas we can have a situation as in

138


the diagram. While in the diagram there are several unserved areas (the shaded region in the figure), in the diagram there is considerable overlapping. Neither of these instances gives a stable result. While in the former case the unserved areas will have to be split equally between neighboring areas, in the latter consumers in the shaded region will tend to choose the nearest centre. Ultimately hexagonal market areas will emerge as given in the diagram. It is only this hexagonal arrangement that ensures an efficient division of space between a number of central places.

Hierarchy of Central Places Christaller’s basic model is organized on the basis of what he calls the marketing principle. The hierarchy and nesting pattern in this case results in the maximum number of central places-a necessary condition if the supply of goods from the central places is to be as near as possible to the consumers (according to the requirement of movement minimization). Such a system, is known as a K=3 network and is shown by filled circles; the next the lower order places (e.g., villages are shown by open circles; and the high order places (e.g., towns) are shown by double circle. Trade area boundaries of these three order settlements are indicated in the figure by solid lines, dashed lines, and double lines, respectively.

The k-value is the total number of settlements of a certain order served by a central place of the next higher order. As would be clear from Fig.5, each hamlet is shared between three villages as shown by the arrows. Since a village has six hamlets at the corners of the hexagon surrounding it, each village serves [(1/3)*6] = 2 hamlets. Adding to this the hamlet part of the functional structure of the village itself (which is obviously served by the village itself), each village serves the equivalent of 3 hamlets, i.e. K= 3.

K Values –Principles of Marketing, Transport and AdministrationIn a similar way it can be shown that a town serves three villages (and therefore nine hamlets) the central place of the next higher order (say, city) will serve three towns, i.e. nine (3*3) villages or 27 hamlets (9*3). Thus, the number of centers and successfully lower order levels in the hierarchy follows a geometric progression (i.e., 1, 3,9,27, etc.).

138


In addition to the principle of marketing, Christaller proposes other principle too – the principle of transportation or principle of traffic and principle of administration. The principle of transportation assumes importance in those cases where cost of transportation is significant. According to this principle, the distribution of central places is at an optimum when as many important places as possible lie on one traffic route between larger towns, the route being established in the cheapest possible manner. Thus sub-centerslie along the routes between the main centers and we have an arrangement as given in fig .6. A hamlet is shared by two villages as represented by the arrows and since a village is surrounded by 6 hamlets (each hamlet being situated midway between two corners of a hexagon and lying on the straight line connecting to villages), each village serves (½ * 6) = 3 hamlets. Adding to this, the hamlet part of the functional structure of the village itself, each village serves the equivalent of (3 +1) = 4 hamlets therefore K = 4.

The ‘K’ value is the total no of settlements of a certain orders served by a central place of the next higher order. It is the total no of settlements served by the center place.

There are three types of ‘ K’ values assigned by Christaller 1. The Marketing Principle ‘K’ value which is equal to 3.2. The Transporting Principle ‘K’ value is equal to 4.3. The Administrative Principle ‘K’ value which is equal to 7.

Marketing Principles and ‘K’ value.Christaller conceived that there are six hamlets at the corner of the hexagons surrounding the village. Since the hexagon is divided into three parts (see hexagon diagrams), each villages serves 1/3rd of the six hamlets i.e., two hamlets. Adding to them will be the village itself and the ‘K’ value becomes 3.A town serves 3 villages and hence 6 hamlets. The central place of the next higher order (city) will serve three towns or 9 villages or 27 hamlets. In the scheme of Christaller , each center place is surrounded by six lower order places which are situated at the vertices of the hexagon. When the original center place is surrounded by six other center places of the same order, the first order trade area of each of the lower order places is competed for by three of the first order places. There fore, each first order place can be depend upon the full first order trade area from itself and one- third of the first order trade area from each of the six lower order places.This market principle is called the ‘K =3’ pattern, because it has the trade of one (itself) and 6 times the one – third (6* 1/3 = 2) of the trade of the other areas. Thus, the frequency of occurrence of different levels of market area follows the geometric progression of 1: 3: 9: 27: 81: 243 & so on, at successively lower levels of the hierarchy.

138


Transportation Principle and ‘K value’ This is also known as the ‘Principle of traffic’. If several habitations lie on a route, then the route will be more efficient and cheap. Sub- centers should lie on the route to center. (See diagram of the transportation principle). Two villages share a hamlet. Since a village is surrounded by a six hamlets (each hamlet being situated between two corners of a hexagon and lying on the straight line connecting two villages), Each village serves (1/2 x 6) 3 hamlets. Adding the village itself, we get ‘K’ value as 4.

The sub- centers in the Christallers scheme of things have “dual loyalty”. The traffic leads to a hierarchy which minimizes the distance between the sub-centers and the main center. The administrative principle and ‘K’ value.

This principle emphasis that each center should have complete control of the 6 surrounding areas and no divided allegiance exists. No power sharing between lower and higher order centers is permitted. The center governs itself also and hence the ‘K’ value is 6+1 = 7.

The administrative principle is based upon the idea that each centre should have complete control of the six surrounding areas with no divided allegiance. Thus, in this case, sharing of the lower order centers between the higher order centers is not permitted. Therefore, it is K = 7.

Central place theory remains even today unsurpassed as a coherent model of spatial organization of the service activities of man. Central place theory indicates that the region can be served by goods of various types, if the central places producing different ranges of goods / services are evenly distributed. The distances separating the settlements will be greater in case of higher centers and proportionally less in the case of lower order centers.

All the central places constitute a hierarchy from the smallest villages to the largest towns of national importance.

Criticism1. Applicable only to service sector which is only a part of the total economy.2. The hierarchy system would be distorted by the location of primary or manufacturing industry.3. The assumption that the consumer will act rationally and patronize the nearest center is not correct.4. Most criticized for its static and descriptive nature, as it deals with its relationship between centers and their hinterlands only at one point of time, but fails to take into account the evolutionary process of spatial structure i.e. how the structure has evolved and might change in future.

However with certain modifications central place theory can be used as a starting point for the spatial development of tertiary activities and social services in any situation. Not with standing its limitations one has to admit that it is a marked improvement over Van Thunen’s theory even today, it provides the most rational approach to the arrangement of human activities, apart from manufacturing.

138


Modifications in the Central Place Theory. August Losch, refined the central place theory by incorporating non-service activities in its functions, August Losch model postulated that there is one superior centre where all goods are produced. The size of the centers increases with distance from the central place and those small centers tend to be located about half way in between larger ones. Losch considered that the size of the hexagon not only in relation to a geographical centre, but also, in relation to the goods produced. Thus a particular centre may have several hexagonal markets for its different products as transport cost is a function of distance, a particular industry X with lower cost transportation will have a bigger hexagonal market area than Y, given the same economics of scale.

138


UNIT III - GROWTH POLE HYPOTHESIS

A French regional economist Francis Perroux (1955) introduced the concept of ‘Growth Pole’. According to this concept public investment programs will have maximum effects on a regional growth if concentrated in a small number of favorable locations in regional development policy.

Assumptions: The concept of growth poles and growth centers is based on certain assumption about the real world.1. Human activities must cluster together to generate internal and external economics of scale.2. If clustering is allowed, it may entail heavy social costs in terms of congestion, diseconomies of scale and spatial imbalances in social and economic development.3. The autonomous process, which generate clustering of human activities and there by create spatial imbalances in economic development, can be directed through policy interventions to generate growth foci in areas where they do not exist.

Perroux Hypothesis:One of the basic objectives of Perroux’s hypothesis is to advance a dynamic theory economic growth, taking the concept of innovative firms as the starting point. To him large economic units are innovative. It exerts its influence on the economy through inter-industrial linkages. Without explaining how the leading industry with strong inter-industry linkages finds a location at which to form a nucleus around which other industries cluster, he concluded that such clusters will become growth poles if several leading and propulsive industries come together to form a complex large enough to exert a determining influence over its industrial environment.

Perroux based his theory on Schumpeter’s analysis of economic development. According to him “Economic Development occurs as a result of discontinuous spurts in a dynamic world”. The innovative entrepreneur whose activities generally take place in large-scale firms causes such discontinuous spurts. These large scale firms are able to dominate their environment in the sense of exercising reversible and partially reversible influences on other economic units by reason of their dimension, negotiations.

The close relationship between scale of operations, dominance and impulses to innovate became the most important features of Perroux’s theory and lead to the concepts of dynamic propulsive firm and leading propulsive industry.

Characteristics of a dynamic propulsive firms it is relatively large has a high ability to innovate belongs to a relatively fast growing sector and The quantity and intensity of its interrelations with other sectors of the economy are important enough for the induced effects to be transmitted to them.

Characteristics of a leading propulsive industry. highly advanced level of technology and managerial expertise high income elasticity of demand for its products

138


marked local multiplier effects and strong inter-industry linkages with other sectors

Two Types of Linkages Backward linkage: An industry encourages investments in the earlier stages of production by expanding its demand for inputs (which are the outputs of industries in the earlier stages of production (e.g. Sugar Industry)Forward linkage: An industry encourages subsequent stages of production either by transmitting innovations or effects of innovations forward.

Transmission of forward linkages As a result of innovations, costs of production in the industry declined. This could lead to a fall in the price of its output. If this happens, the demand for this industry’s will increase. In addition to this possibility, there are many other ways in which innovations or effects of innovations can be transmitted forward.

Basis of Perroux TheoryThus Perroux based his theory on two cornerstones 1. Schumpeterian theory of development (i.e. Growth does not appear everywhere and all at once; it appears in points or development poles with variable intensities; it spread along diverse channels and with varying terminal effects to the whole of the economy)

2. Theory of inter-industry linkages and industrial interdependence.Based on this Perroux developed his idea of economic space as a field of forces consisting of centers (or poles or foci) from which centrifugal forces emanate and to which centripetal forces are attracted.

It was Boudeville who gave geographic content to Perroux’s economic space. He defined a ‘growth pole’ as a set of expanding industries located in an urban area and it includes further development of economic activity throughout its zone of influence. The place where these ‘expanding’ or ‘propulsive’ or ‘dominant industries’ are located in the region becomes the poles of the region and agglomeration tendencies are promoted. Such tendencies arise because of external economies and result in polarization of economic activities around that pole. The external economies that become available in the area constituting the growth pole of a region are basically of the following three types.

External Economy1. Economies internal to the firm: These are the lower average costs of production resulting from an increased rate of output. These are the economies, which any single firm by its organization and effort can enjoy. e.g. organizational efficiency and effectiveness

138


2. Economies external to the firm but internal to the industryThese are associated with localization of industry on account of close locational proximity of linked firms, as industry expands at a particular location, cost per unit of output to a firm declines e.g., textile units at Coimbatore, match factories at Sivakasi3. Economic external to the industry but internal to the urban area. These can be termed urbanization economies. They include development of urban labor market, access to a larger market, and provision of a wide range of services.

Thus Schumpeterian theory of development acts as a fulcrum to establishTheory of backward and forward linkages activities, industries & services inExternal economies an urban area, from there emanates

centrifugal forces and to which centripetal forces are attracted.

Applicability of Growth Pole theory in Regional PlanningGrowth Pole concept has become popular because of its orientation towards ‘dynamic industry’ (i.e. dynamic propulsive firm & leading propulsive industry) ‘polarization and agglomeration’ (inter-industry linkages of external economies) and the promise of ensuring “spread effects”

Thus the growth pole theory postulates that if we carefully plan the public investment programs to be concentrated or located in a small number of favorable locations then it will have maximum spread effects on a regional growth.

Because of this, the underdeveloped countries today regard it as the most promising hope for regenerating the economy of backward areas.To develop backward regions, one has to implant potential propulsive industries there and concentrate investments in the selected poles rather than spread them thinly over the whole region.

Even though it promotes structural imbalance over the whole region, it is justified that concentration of expansionary momentum at the poles will result in higher per capita income level in the region as a whole.

Concentration of investments and public expenditure in a few selected points will enable more effective use of resources and there would be better chance of generating enough external economies.

Inadequacies of the Growth Pole hypothesis Critics of growth pole hypothesis point out four main weaknesses.

1. Growth Pole theory is inapplicable to varied regional problems. In resource rich, well populated but socially and economically backward regions, the growth policy has not been a success. e.g. Visakapatnam Port – Shipyard as a core Rourkela & Bhilai – modern steel plant as core

138


The impact of these projects on the regional economy has, however, not been spectacular and the so called leading industry in each case failed to generate development impulses in the hinter land. Except for the physical development that happened in the area, people lead the same traditional lives as they always have. The leading industries are closely linked with distant manufacturing centers. In their immediate regional environment, there is hardly any spread effect. Industrial centers like Durgapur, Jamsedpur

etc stand as monuments of national achievement but regional failure. The ‘backwash’ process has started operating and the regions linkages with Calcutta Industrial region are closer than those with other towns in the area.

2. Urban and Industrial Bias:Important weakness inherent in the growth pole hypothesis is it’s over dependence on propulsive industries in selected urban areas. It disregards other aspects of development. To expect that any large-scale industry will be able to create the socio–economic imperatives for its own growth is unrealistic.

3. Functional Rigidity:Growth pole hypothesis is functionally rigid by emphasizing productive activities and economic opportunities created through dynamic propulsive industries. In third world countries this is not enough. Addition to this (i,e, productive activities), growth pole must function as (1) Central places (2) Innovative and growth promoting centers, (3) Social interaction points. It is therefore to get rid of functional rigidities, attached with the growth pole concept.

4. Lack of Spill over Mechanism:

Growth Pole Hypothesis and Central Place Theory:The Growth pole theory explains the impact of propulsive industries and leading firms on regional economic development. But it is not in itself a theory of location, which explains where the functional poles are or where the most likely locations of the new poles may be. To explain this, it has to relay on the central place theory. On the other hand, the central place theory does not explain the growth phenomena; It is a static theory which only explains the existence of certain patterns of centers. It does not say how these patterns come into being and how they may undergo changes in the future. To explain these dynamic phenomena, it needs the help of the growth pole theory.

R.P. Misra’s modified Growth Foci Approach:R.P. Misra notes the following three important weaknesses in the conventional growth pole theory when it is applied to conditions prevailing in underdeveloped countries.

138


1) The hypothesis has its roots in western economic thought where its role has been defined in terms of accelerating development through industrialization. Undue emphasis on industrialization programs introduces “functional rigidity” in the growth pole theory.

2) In undeveloped countries like India, the growth foci should not be concerned with industrial development alone. They have to perform two other basic functions: (a) they must function as service centers and meet the day-to-day needs of the area they serve (i.e. they must function as central places in the form postulated by Christaller); and (b) they must act as innovative and growth promoting centers. They must have processing and manufacturing activities of both basic and non-basic types and should be able to provide employment to the drop–outs of the agricultural system. Thus the role of growth foci is not limited to manufacturing of goods, it includes the creation of conditions under which industrial development can occur and;

3. In under developed countries, the growth foci have to function as social interaction points also. They have to act as the centers of diffusion of information. Provision of extension services, educational services and meeting places is necessary to accomplish this task”.

Recognizing the importance of the growth pole theory in the process of regional planning and taking account of the above considerations, Misra extends the concept of growth pole to the concept of growth foci. This new concept of growth foci seeks to integrate the main elements of the central place theory, the growth pole theory and the spatial diffusion theory. The earlier version of the theory advocated the following four–tier hierarchy of growth foci.1. Service centers at the local level.2. Growth points at the sub – regional level 3. Growth centers at the regional level4. Growth poles at the national level.

The later formulation envisages a five–tier hierarchy with the central village at the local level, the service centers at the micro regional level, the growth points at the sub–regional level, the growth centers at the regional level and the growth poles at the national level.R.P. Misra’s hierarchy of growth centers

Hierarchy of Growth Foci

Population & coverage

Nature Facilities expected

1. Central Village

Population 6000 covering 6 villages.

Revenue village or village panchayat.

Offering marketing, recreational and social services; will have primary school, sub post office, health sub centre, primary co-operative

2. Service Centre

Population 30,000 covering 5 central villages + 5,000

Head quarters of the extension officers, minor govt. functionaries; focal points for social

Will have grocery store general merchant shops, minor repair facilities, tailor, larger shops, restaurants, primary and middle school,

138


population in the service centre itself; Town Panchayat

intercourse sub-post office, co-operative bank, rice mill, flour mill, cinema theatre

3. Growth Points

Coverage 1.5 lakh population i.e. serving 5 service centers plus 10,000 to 25,000 population of the growth point itself municipal town or taluk head quarters.

Sub-regional innovative and propulsive urban centers; contribute to the social, economic and emotional integration of the respective sub region; linked with sister growth points by state highways and with the service centers by district/local road net works.

Will contain all the facilities located in the service centers. Over and above it will have agro industries, dairy processing units, junior college, primary level specialized medical facilities etc.

4. Growth Poles

Coverage – 10 to 12 lakhs of population; plus 50, 000 to 5,00,000 population of the growth centre it self.

There will be 500 growth centers in the country as a whole. District headquarters; acts as counter magnets to large urban centers like Bombay, Madras, Calcutta, Delhi etc.

Predominance of secondary activities; will have collecting, storage and processing facilities for agricultural products; will produce agricultural inputs such as fertilizers, pesticides, and machines; will have radio/television station, banking facilities, degree college, university, technical institutions; operation of external economies; will function as industrial hubs of the area they serve.

5. Growth Poles

Population of a growth pole ranges from 5 lakhs to 25 lakhs – It will serve a population of 20 – 30 million

Designed to serve as the ‘heart’ of one macro region of the country; state headquarters

Will send out financial technological, research and industrial impulses to all centers and points within the area of their command; will perform highly specialized secondary and tertiary activities.

Such an extension of the growth pole theory opens up immense possibilities for the application of this theory in promoting the process of regional and national economic growth. By ensuring a linked pattern of hierarchy of human settlements, it also successfully avoids the damages of over urbanization and of depressed areas co-existing with developed areas. The problem of providing an adequate institutional infrastructure in the rural areas is also properly looked after. Adoption of this strategy leads to what Misra calls “decentralized concentration”.

UNIT III - GROWTH CENTERS / GROWTH POINTS & GROWTH FOCI

138


Growth CentersA growth center (bottom rung in the hierarchy) is a locational concept and it does not involve the selection of related industries – as in the ‘growth ‘pole’. The growth centre development entails the concentration of investment in the chosen location where economies of urbanization are promoted to attract more industries. On the other hand the growth pole policy necessitates the development of a selected industrial focus composed of propulsive firms from leading industries; the intention being to foster economies of localization.

When the industries are localized, ‘a growth pole policy’ will inevitably result in a growth centre and the generation of the resultant economies of urbanization. However, this is not necessarily true in the reverse: a growth center policy may not lead to the development of a growth pole of linked industries. Yet, it is precisely what is needed through planning.

Growth pole explanation is about regional structure while the growth center policy is about intra-regional imbalance. The basic idea is that growth pole and / or growth center should promote such economic development that is acceptable from socio-political and ethno-psychological standpoints. Growth poles and growth centers should improve the physical quality of life of the people in the entire space and should reduce inequalities.

There can be growth centers with assortment of industries – a nucleus from which growth could spread into the rest of the region. In addition, development in a limited number of growth centers should also bring rural transformation.

As a result of the disillusionment with the growth pole model, the growth centre approach was conceived as an alternative strategy. A growth centre can be district HQ in a Multi-Level Planning. In is not necessary that the industries of the growth centre should be capital intensive involving lumpy investment. A growth center can have industries based on agricultural raw materials and / or for supplying manufactured goods needed for the agricultural economy. If an urban centre can provide market outlets for the produce of the hinterland and if it supplies vital inputs of development to the rural sector, the centre can be an ideal growth centre. Growth centers can be much more decentralized than the growth poles. It is true that decentralization leads to gradual centralization at many points and centralization at different points leads to gradual decentralization, but it has now become imperative that benefits of growth should be available on decentralized basis to the interior areas.

Urban centers already exist can be converted into growth centers if better linkages are developed with the hinterland. Complementary economic activities can be made to converge at a centre. Growth centers can be developed through planning for the locational convergence of activities in their compatible combination. However, any geographical agglomeration of activities is not automatically developmental. There has to be appropriate mix of activities with strong linkages with the economy of the hinterland.

If some large villages and towns can serve the hinterlands with services and become nodal points of transportation network and have various types of local-resources-based industries, they can become growth centers. A growth centre should provide basic

138


infrastructure, functions and facilities for the commercial agriculture. Growth centersshould create such conditions that distress migration from rural areas is arrested.

The growth centre strategy was followed by erstwhile socialist countries and also by many developing countries. Even countries like France, Italy and India had their own version of growth centers. Under the Community Development Program, the block headquarter was intended to be growth centre for rural development. Under the new industrial policy of India, the district industrial centre was to facilitate emergence of the industrial growth centersin each district. We can definitely say that cities like Calcutta, Bombay, Kanpur or Madras were conforming to the growth poles hypothesis but they failed to develop the hinterland. In fact, not only shantytowns emerged in and around these centers but also they became examples of unbearable dualism vis-à-vis their hinterland.

A growth centre provides higher order services needed by the people and will have a dominant position in the patterns of interaction. A growth centre is normally an urban centre capable of promoting growth in rural hinterland which can provide finance, marketing, transport, communications, extension, medical, educational, training and other facilities to the people of the hinterland.

Growth centers can have industries of the public, private, joint and cooperative sectors and there can be their ancillaries also. There are principal industries and supplementary and complementary industries. Ancillary industries of the public or private sectors industries supply essential components or other materials. Automobile industries buy tiers and tubes, or nuts and bolts (according to their specifications) from ancillary industries. In India politically influential parties who could get permission for the same started many ancillaries of the public sector units. They enjoyed monopoly to supply certain things to the public sector units, often at the inflated prices. In was also observed that while the main units were nearly in the red, the ancillaries earned fabulous profits. Now, it is gathered that the ancillaries of many public sector units have to compete with others for supplying materials/parts to the main units at competitive prices.

A growth centre must have good-sized industries and/or many small-scale industrial units thriving to become growth centre. In India the structure of industries did not conform to the needs of the rural people. The vertical hierarchy of (a) growth foci/central village, (b) service centers, (c) growth points, (d) growth centers and (e) growth poles did not develop diversified industries needed for the development of the primary sector, the rural areas and the people of the hinterland. Instead of supplementing the traditional occupational skills and crafts, the industries of the growth centers often supplanted them.

In most cases around the growth centers, the prime agricultural land got converted into the residential/industrial land. The villagers were relegated to the interior areas. Many agriculturists became mere landless laborers. Thus many so-called growth centers became ‘suction pumps’ of the poor people of rural hinterland-but not providing decent employment or income. A growth centre has to act a guidepost of development for the hinterland.

138


Location PointsConceptually, the growth point and the central places are not the same. Central places are numerous and arranged in a hierarchy, whereas there will be very few growth points. Some economists treat growth points and growth poles as one and the same thing, but most writers in India treat growth point as lower order growth centre.

In the words of Richardson:” Growth point theory implicitly draws upon the export base concept but gives it a spatial dimension, since the key industries are located at the growth point whereas supplying industries, labor, raw materials and dependent services may be dispersed over the zone of influence”.

A growth point has its ‘zone of influence, while a central place has a ‘complementary region’. A growth point sustains the regions, while the central place is sustained by its region. The polarization flows will be more intense and more varied in character around a growth point than around a central place where the flows consist mainly of commuting for shopping, leisure and other services.”

Factors, which promote localization of industries, become necessary for developing a growth point/centre. New growth points become necessary to relieve the congestion of the old growth points/poles. The government has a big role to play in developing the growth points.

Growth Foci VLS Prakasa Rao and RP Misra advanced the concept of ‘growth foci’. This concept was derived from the growth pole theory of Perroux and Boudeville.

According to RP Misra. “The growth pole theory has proved to be inapplicable to developing countries marked with dual economies. The growth poles transplanted in such economies have remained poles without a deeply rooted broad base. The propulsive industries located in the poles have failed to diffuse development in the hinterland. To suit the socio-economic conditions of the developing countries, the growth pole theory has been modified and the concept of system of growth foci has been evolved. In a very limited way the concept has been accepted in several developing countries as a tool to develop backward areas and regions while at the same time integrate the traditional and modern sectors of the economy into a single whole”.

RP Misra’s six-tier growth foci.At the highest level, there is to be a growth pole and at the lowest level a group of villages and hamlets. It seems that in his scheme the first five tier setup transmit growth impulses. These six tiers are:a) Growth Poles. b) Growth Centers.c) Growth Points.d) Service Centers.e) Central Villages.f) Villages and hamlets.

It should be acknowledged that M/s Rao and Misra have removed the confused interpretation of the word ‘poles’, ‘centers’, and ‘points’.

138


Not only that their six-tier setup is theoretically sound but practical also, This six-tier state of affairs can be found in real life and/or can be planned as well. It is a sound workable scheme for regional analysts as well as for the national and regional planners.

The growth foci structure can provide/provides necessary complementarities between (a) nodes, (b) linkages and (c) hinterland, which are three basic elements which enter into the organization of space.

Nodes are the central places connected by transport, communication and other linkages. Since nodes differ in sizes and influence, the sizes and nature of the hinterlands also differ. Larger nodes have better linkages and have specialized functions. (For example, though medical colleges may exist at several places, there may be only a few experts who can repair broken jaw and face bones). Larger nodes have bigger area of influence, also known as first order hinterlands. One does not travel from a very distant area to a very big nodal point unless one is in need for a very special commodity or service. The smaller nodes have smaller hinterlands and people from villages may travel to a nearby town to buy just ordinary things of life. In multi-level planning there are attempts to re-organize the spatial economy by restructuring the nodes, linkages and the hinterlands, so that the processes of centralized concentration gives way to decentralized concentration of human activities. The restructured organization can be referred to as spatial framework for multi-level planning.

The hybrid concept (which seeks to incorporate something of Perroux’s growth pole theory, Chistaller’s theory of hierarchy of central places, and Friedman’s concept of city as an articulator and mobilizer of the periphery’s resources in a process of transition) can serve the needs of socio-economic multi-level planning in less developed countries.

According to Prakasa Rao and RP Misra, growth poles lead to agglomeration and dualism. They ignore the rural needs and promote the urban ethos. The growth nodes or poles do not trigger off impulses of development to rural areas nor receive type of support that they should get from the rural areas. The trickle-down thesis has not proved to be correct and growth poles remain rootless and without mooring with economy of the hinterland. It has been seen that in a country like India, their backwash effects exceed their spread effects and thus the linkages remain weak.

If in the pre-independence India, the growth poles followed the principle of ‘comparative advantage’, in the post-independence period “funds followed flag”–constituencies of important politicians were favored more in terms of investment. Public sector projects were located not for the best interests of all and ‘administration’ was considered sufficient in place of ‘management’. Rural regions remained neglected. Infact, all the seven-sister states of the east remained neglected. The dysfunctional organization of the secondary sector became exploitative of the rural areas, poor people and the primary sector.

There is to be a sectoral integration. Secondary sector should first produce those outputs, which are inputs for the development of agriculture and the tertiary sector, and the basic goods of mass consumption. If that happens then agriculture will supply more goods of

138


consumption. The rural people will have enough purchasing power to increase their liability towards the other two sectors and all the three sectors can develop in juxtaposition. Several centers which supply inputs of development corresponding to the socio-cultural ethos of the people also become necessary. These centers are generally there; they are to be developed to be functional for providing development inputs to the hinterland’s sectors and people.

Growth foci can provide a network of basic and non-basic industries. Growth foci are not a centre only but the entire set conditions of development. It has to provide facilities and functions of development as also the ‘extension culture and social atmosphere’. The five-tier upper hierarchy can provide facilities of diffusion of technology, information and infact the culture of materialism.

The arrangement can be/should be as under:

1. Cluster of villages Central village.2. Micro-minor region Service centre.3. Micro region: sub-regional Growth point.4. Meso region Growth centre.5. Macro region Growth pole.

The total number of growth foci can depend upon several factors e.g., the size of the country, the dispersal of population in villages, the resource situation and administrative factors. Growth foci arrangement can have the innovative role of the growth pole and service provisions role of the central places. Rao and Misra conceived that central villages, service towns, market towns, growth points, growth centers and growth poles are all part of the system of growth foci. The scheme of hierarchical levels can be put as under, according to Rao and Misra.Hierarchy of Growth Foci

1. Central village: This would be one, which can serve 6 villages and about 6000 population with marketing, service, recreational and socio-cultural interaction functions.

2. Service centre: It can be a small town with a population of 5000 or so. It should be able to serve 5 central villages i.e. population of about 30000. Such a centre (in the nature of the administration in India) will have an extension officer, para medical staff, teachers and village level workers. It will have various types of shops for multi various primary needs.

3. Growth point: This will again serve 5 service centers, thus a population of 1.5 lakhs or so. This growth point can itself have a population of about 10000 to 25000. They will have good connectivity with the district head quarters. A sub-divisional office or a Tehsil headquarter can fit in with this. The centre will assume agro-industrial character and will have close links with the sister growth points also. Considerable strength can be found in the activities relating to the production, supply of inputs, marketing, processing, service functions etc.

138


4. Growth Centers: They can be district headquarters or other big towns. They can have population ranging from 50000 to 5, 00,000. Each growth centre can look after the growth needs of 12 lakh or more population. Growth centers should have somewhat strong industrial base also. This is possible only if the industrialization follows a decentralized pattern.

Ideal growth centers are those which can act as counter-magnets to the large urban centers. Already people in these cities are in jitters because of the shortage of housing units, high degree of pollution and a lot of time involved in commuting distances-to speak nothing about the high cost of living and leading a life where personal relations are at a discount. This centre should have facilities of comprehensive banking, higher education (college level), good medical infrastructure, wholesales supplies, storage, collection etc.; and comprehensive extension services for the agricultural, rural and agro-industrial development.

5. Growth Poles: 1. Capital cities and some very important district headquarters can act as growth poles. In Madhya Pradesh, for example, Bhopal, Indore Bhilai, Gwalior, Jabalpur etc. can become growth poles (Tamil Nadu Madurai, Coimbatore, Erode, Tuticorin, Salem). A growth pole in a small state can cover the entire state.

One cannot but agree with Rao and Misra that such hierarchy exists and needs to be strengthened and where it does not, it should be brought into existence.

With government support and with natural course (market mechanism) vertical and horizontal linkages can get strengthened. The role of the government becomes important in that it can integrate functions over the space in shorter time period.

Slowly, functions of higher order will get located in the settlements of lower order ad that is how some rural centers become urban centers. However, every growth point cannot become a growth pole. Rao and Misra even calculated that Indian needs 30 growth poles and 4000 growth points, with each district becoming the growth centre. These centers are not be established but developed and strengthened. There is nothing which prevents some higher order functions/facilities being available in settlements of lower order (for example, the best bone hospital in Madhya Pradesh is located in an interior village in Betul district-at Padar). Ultimately there has to be vertical and horizontal integration of the development of sectors, regions and groups of persons. Vested interest groups will always come in the way of greater equalization and all the labor and luck is necessary to promote growth and efficiency and remove inequalities.

In the growth foci structure, both the centrifugal and centripetal economic linkages can get promoted to increase the welfare in the country. Motivation for growth can also become infectious. If the growth foci structure is developed, then the growth pole hypothesis and central place theories get social content and economic practicability. Decentralized growth will improve the physical quality of life of the people. Connectivity will not be in the narrow sense of transport and communications efficiency but also in terms of social interaction. Not material inputs of development but the psychic inputs of development will also get diffused. In due course of time both real and financial resources will be generated for complementary development.

138


In this system the growth pole should act as a primate city also of a macro-region. In the growth pole area we can say that the primary activities are not taken up. Even secondary functions are of less importance in comparison to the tertiary sector functions. Quaternary activities such as banking, administrative, marketing, cultural facilities dominate.

Growth centers in such a scheme are essentially industrial centers producing goods for the national and regional markets. According to the scheme of things suggested by RP Misra, they may be based on regional or extra-regional resources. The tertiary activities will match the requirements of regional population. In the hinterland of a growth pole where there can be several growth centers, the number would depend upon the resources available and regional development needs. In fact, the growth centers should relieve the growth poles from the concentration of secondary activities. The growth centers should diffuse industrial production to the areas lagging in development. A growth centre can have agro-based industries in a dynamic agricultural/plantation area.

A growth point is conceived to be a satellite of a growth centre. There would be several growth points in the meso-region served by a growth centre. A growth point should specialize in processing and tertiary functions.

A service centre has to provide lower order service facilities to the villagers while the central village should have most elementary basic lower order facilities.

138


UNIT III - THE CUMULATIVE CAUSATION THEORY(Backwash Effects versus Spread Effects)

Gunnar Myrdal’s TheoryNoble Prizewinner in economics, Prof. Gunnar Myrdal has written a lot on the problems of less developed countries. His monumental book “Asian Drama” in three

volumes and thousands of pages analyses the development process of Asian countries. Prof. Myrdal is well known for some of his theses, the main of which are the Theory of Backwash Effects of International Trade, the Cumulative Causation Theory of Economic Development and the Institutional Reform Theory of Development. In the first two theories the causes of vicious circle of backwardness have been analyzed, while in the third we find some explicit suggestions for the development of less developed countries.

PART-IBackwash Effects of International and Inter regional Economic RelationsMyrdal believes that international and inter-regional economic relations in practice involve unequal exchanges in the sense that the weak are always exploited by the strong. Belief in the competitive market benefiting all is misplaced.

Less developed countries face three types of problems (as analyzed in the ‘backwash effects theory’). First, the developed countries exploit them in international economic relations. Second the rich regions are also in the semi-colonial position with regard to the backward regions. Third, the rich people milk the poor persons of these countries.

International trade resulted in the immiserisation process in less developed countries. When foreigners invested in less developed countries they usually invested in plantation, mining and a few selected industries. These investments created lop-sided development in the countries because the nature of development was dualistic. These investments did not trigger off growth impulses in the hinterland.

The precious resources of the nations were drained off. The people by and large remained as backward as ever in the vicinity of big projects. The skilled personnel who worked there developed feudal and colonial approach to the development problems. These were the backwash effects of the development. Capital, skills and people moved out of backward regions to the developed regions, leaving the latter poor and dry.

The spread effects of development were just a few and disjointed or discontinuous. These spread effects were those which gave expansionary momentum from the centers of economic expansion to other regions, and were centrifugal in nature. The main cause of economic backwardness and regional disparities has been the strong backwash effects and the weak spread effects.

138


Everything clustered in certain regions from art, literature, education and culture to medical facilities, science, commerce, banking, insurance, power development etc. Big cities developed in port areas. Banking system so developed that the credit-deposit ratios went against the poor regions and while deposits were collected from poor regions, credit facilities for investment was given to developed regions.

Another distressing effect of the past development pattern was that the big industries and urban centers, not only not helped the small industries or cottage industries and rural sectors but positively made them further backward. Handicraft industries died a miserable and lingering death without government support due to unhealthy competition from the developed sector. Even agriculture could not develop in these regions.

There were some spread effects from the nodal regions to the hinterland. The hinterland did supply raw materials etc, to the centers of development and in turn received consumer goods. However, these spread effects never helped in the self-expansion process in the rural areas.

The two types of effects were never in equilibrium. The position was that SPE(spread effects) BWE (backwash effects) in developed regions while in the less developed countries or regions the BWE > SPE. Spread effects continued to become stronger in developed countries while backwash effects continued to become even more widespread in backward countries and regions. This was the type of “dynamism” in the past, and to a large extends even now between the developed and backward regions.

In the developed regions and countries “development becomes automatic process and nothing succeeds like success”. In the backward regions and countries “poverty becomes its own cause and nothing fails like failure”.

Another aspect of these effects is that while the income elasticity of demand for agricultural products is not high, it is pretty high for industrial products. The terms of trade, therefore, change in favour of the sector, which is already developed. When the terms of trade go against the backward sectors, they have to supply more in real terms to get the same amount of real supplies from the other sector/region/countries. This dampens the supply responses further. They cannot increase the prices and they cannot get the advantage of reducing the prices also, because of the low-income elasticity of demand.

Money earned in these sector/regions/countries is not reinvested in these very sectors but is repatriated to the developed sector, regions and countries. Increased exports from the backward sectors in the past led to inflationary pressure, increasing poverty, balance of payment difficulties, conspicuous consumption and absence of favorable multiplier effects.

There were barriers galore to the spread effects, which included the unhelpful attitude of the rich countries and regions, sectors and people and also of the governments.

PART IIThe cumulative causation theory of development and backwardness

138


The theory of cumulative causation has been built upon the above two effects viz, the backwash effects and the spread effects. The cumulative causation theory emphasized that poverty is further perpetuated by poverty (where backwash effects overwhelm the spread effects), and affluence is further promoted by affluence, (where spread effects overwhelm the backwash effects).

In backward regions problems create more problems; in developed regions auto-solution solve all problems. There is a failure story and there is a success story.

The rebounded effects and circular causation effects are the net result of the backwash effects and the spread effects.

There is inter-locking relation by which in the cumulative process, poverty becomes its own cause whereas development promotes further development.

Myrdal wrote: “If the spread effects are sustained or accelerated further and backwash effects are resisted or rebounded back to their origin, the pace of economic development of backward regions or class will be improved in terms of time distances. These two effects originate at the centre of economic expansion i.e. growth centers for lower order support functions and at the growth poles for higher functions. Since the two effects are counter-balanced on tangent areas of the two influence circles, it would be imperative to pressurize a positive force of changes leading to upward movement. The role of “big push” becomes obvious to break through the stagnating situation. Economic incentive to producers, in terms of differential rates of capital subsidy, market subsidy, support price, fiscal support should be granted. These would generate rebound effects on the backwash effects.”

Myrdral writes that if the rebound effects are well directed, the spread effects can develop a region. Since the spread effects gradually decline at constant rate with increase in spatial distance from the growth centre, it would be in the fitness of things to locate sub-growth centre, in such future growth potential areas. It would be of much avail to raise intensity of spread effects at point of equilibrium (rather than at existing growth centre), and thereby to extend existing zone of influence to that of other growth centers.

The ‘vicious circle’ type theory of cumulative causation emphasizes that excessive backwash effects keep a less developed country poor. Inequalities do not get reduced on their own but get accentuated. Disequilibrium causes further disequilibrium.

He writes: “The idea I want to expound is that, in the normal case, there is no tendency towards automatic self-stabilization in the social system. The system is not by itself moving towards any sort of balance between forces, but is constantly moving away from such a situation. In the normal case a change does not call forth-countervailing changes, but instead, supporting changes, which move the system in the same direction as the first change but much further. Because of such circular causation a social process tends to become cumulative and often to gather speed at an accelerating rate.”

Thus (as we have seen if the BWE >SPE there will be cumulative causation towards poverty and vice versa), if it is intended that spread effects should overwhelm backwash

138


effects, then state intervention (SI) effect should exceed adverse cumulative causation effects.

Myrdal contention is that “the play of the forces in market normally tends to increase, rather than decrease, the inequality between regions”. Once a particular region starts growing faster than the average, the “efficiency wage” in that region tends to fall. (It means that as the efficiency and productivity increase, the per unit wages–burden on the cost of production of commodities falls). This region gains comparative advantage over other regions and it becomes cumulative. This has reinforcing effects in terms of industrial development giving rise to widening regional inequality.

Myrdal’s theory is counter-periphery model. The favorable effects flow from the centre to the periphery. Periphery supplies raw materials and raw human power to the centre. The centre supplies the technical know-how and finished output for consumption and inputs also. Core activities are at the centre. Subsidiary activities are in the periphery area. After some time the activities in the periphery may give rise to new core regions. This new core region will become the new centre after some time. Then it will from this place that new peripheral regions will develop.

When periphery becomes the net loser the effects are backwash effects. When the centre becomes the net gainer, the effects are spread effects for the core activity region.

When the spread effects dominate, the core region develops further. In such a case there will be economic integration between the centre and the periphery, which will give rise to a more homogeneous spatial system.

When backwash effects dominate, there will be lack of complementarity and divergences will develop. Periphery will remain weak; only centre will develop and dualism in growth is promoted.

Under such circumstances, the core will continue to experience a circular upward reinforcing trend of favorable effects and the periphery will have a reverse experience.

Cumulative causation theory proves (i) that market mechanism will not bring equality between regions but will increase inequalities, and (ii) nothing short of government intervention will check the backwash effects from getting cumulative.

The process of cumulative causation starts accidentally due to “momentum of an early start” and it be just by chance. Once the growth starts, the external and internal economies bring continuous growth at the expense of other localities and regions where relative stagnation or regression becomes the opposite pattern. In backward regions there is outflow of resources, human power, and capital.

Development of infrastructure and directly productive investment brings spread effects, and they induce technical advance and all types of industries grow. “In reality, the expanding, stagnating and regressing localities are arranged in a fairly continuous series on different levels, with all possible gradations between the extremes.

138


PART IIIGetting out of the trap of cumulative causation of backwardnessIf the remedial measures are to be conceived, than naturally they will consist of removing the causes. If free international trade has more backwash effects, protection is called for. If market mechanism further accentuates backwardness, the government sponsored and regulated economy becomes desirable. If regional inequalities are promoted through circular causation, then the doctrine of balanced regional growth is to be advocated.

If the centre and the core are in the semi-colonial relationship with the periphery, then such development programs which provide for greater complementarity, integration and linkages are called for, all efforts are to be geared towards ending the socio-economic dualism in development in less developed countries. Myrdal goes so far as to suggest that the developed countries should now transfer funds and technical knowledge to less developed countries on mass scale so that the latter get the spread effects as compensation for the past backwash effects.

Myrdal has made many other recommendations also. He recommends promotion of capital goods and import substitution industries and also of those industries which permit simultaneous development outside the sphere of modern large-scale industry. He wants employment creation to be the main plank for poverty removal.

Myrdal is bitter-in fact very bitter – about the corruption in less developed economies. Lack of order, discipline, accuracy and punctuality can be witnessed as national character or at least as chronic national habit. Widespread superstitions, corruption, lack of collective leadership, inaction, lethargy and traditionalism-abound.

Myrdal is against the model building approach for less developed countries. Models are rigorous but unrealistic. Exercises in model building are fascinating but inappropriate. They ignore social accounting. Myrdal prefers theory to a model. He rejects the one-sector model or even two-sector model for the multi-structural society.

Myrdal rightly contends that “it is in the agricultural sector that the battle for long-term economic development in South Asia will be won or lost. He is against too much radicalism in agriculture. He wants moderate land reforms because radical land reforms take the initiative away and reduces the rise of the holdings to less than optimum limit.

A new socio-economic order is to be superimposed, which should be alternative to Marxism. Myrdal’s sympathies apparently lie with planning. He does not approve subsidizing the ‘big business’ by low rates of interest, cheap rates of foreign exchange, protection from foreign competition, and low prices for services and goods from the public sector.

Myrdal laments the collusion among politicians, officials and business people in appropriating the gains of planning to themselves. Myrdal wants far reaching institutional reforms that should bring the benefits the planning to the masses that will annihilate the vested interest groups.

138


Critical evaluationAppreciationMyrdal is internationally respected for his views. A western economist, yet he exposed the backwash effects of international trade on the poor countries and regions. Though not a communist, yet he proved that the so-called competitive markets instead of solving the problems of backward regions, sector and people accentuate them.

Myrdal theses have made important contributions to the theories of convergence and divergence, and agglomeration and locational economics and the theory of “vicious circles”. He is for balanced growth and wanted it to be initiated, directed and sustained by the government. He becomes an important supporter of the theory of sponsored growth.

The analysis part of the Myrdal’s writings is found to be much more satisfactory than the recommendatory part. He could not develop a complete theory of development, in which he could have written in details about the growth process from the start to the pinnacle.

138


UNIT IV - RIVER VALLEY PLANNING

River: A large stream of water flowing over the land. A river is any natural stream of fresh water, which flows, in a well-defined channel. River Basin: A whole region drained by a river with its tributaries

Water Shed: A line separating two river basins---drainage or a catchment areaWater Shed: Land that stores rain water or snow water in its soil and eventually gives up this water to form a river or a stream is called water shed.

Watershed may be of any size A small hill that yield a stream

Raised portion of land that extends many miles and supplies a river

Large drainage basin extends to thousands of miles.

138


Vegetative cover in the WS area—soaks rain water, arrest rapid runoff of surface water—soak down and trickle down to the water table.

The term Watershed refers to an area which has a ridge line on three sides and whose surplus run off is drained out from a drainage point. Big watersheds separate drainage basins. Watersheds can be as small as 50 hectares in hilly areas and as large as 5000 to10000 hectares or even more elsewhere. Sometimes the catchment area of a small seasonal stream could also be considered as a watershed or sub watershed. The size of the watershed to be choosen for land development / soil conservation depends upon the objectives of the land development planning to be attempted in a particular water shed.

River Valley in IndiaDamodar River (541 Km-336 Miles) flows through Bihar and West Bengal. It is notorious and known for its erratic character—for the last 150 years—floods occurred

All rivers start at the highest point in an area. As the river flows downstream, it gains more water from other streams, rivers, springs, added rainfall, and other water sources. What is a river?A river is fresh water flowing across the surface of the land, usually to the sea. It flows in a channel. The bottom of the channel is called the bed and the sides of the channel are called the banks. Where do rivers begin and end?Rivers begin in mountains or hills, where rain water or melting snow collects and forms tiny streams called gullies. Gullies either grow larger when they collect more water and become streams themselves or meet streams and add to the water already in the stream. How are rivers formed?When one stream meets another and they merge together, the smaller stream is known as a tributary. It takes many tributary streams to form a river. What do Rivers provide?Most settlements were built along major rivers. Rivers provide us with food, energy, recreation, transportation routes, and of course water for irrigation and for drinking.Why are rivers important?WaterRivers carry water and nutrients to areas all around the earth. They play a very important part in the water cycle, acting as drainage channels for surface water. Rivers drain nearly 75% of the earth's land surface. HabitatsRivers provide a habitat and food for many of the earth's organisms; their powerful forces create majestic sceneryTransport Rivers provide travel routes for exploration, commerce and recreation.FarmingRiver valleys and plains provide fertile soils. Farmers in dry regions irrigate their cropland using water carried by irrigation ditches from nearby rivers. EnergyRivers are an important energy source. During the early industrial era, mills, shops, and factories were built near fast-flowing rivers where water could be used to power machines. Today steep rivers are still used to power hydroelectric plants and their water turbines. Rivers GlossaryTributary ;a stream flowing into or joining a larger stream Distributary ;any of the numerous stream branches into which a river divides where it reaches its delta Upstream ;moves toward headwater (up the regional slope of erosion) Downstream ;moves toward mouth of river (delta) Delta ;a large, roughly triangular body of sediment deposited at the mouth of a River Meander ;a broad, looping bend in a river

138


more than 17 times—inundating villages up to 6-7 feet –caused heavy damage –malarial fever—disturbed by this WB Government appointed Damodar Flood Enquiry Committee—the committee submitted its report in 1945—they secured the services of Voorden, senior engineer of TVA (Tennessee Valley Authority).Voordun suggested to set up a separate authority to manage the river basin—based on this Damodar Valley Corporation Act was passed in 1948.

Objectives & Functions of River Valley Planning1. Promotion and operation of schemes

for irrigation water supply and drainage.

2. Generation , transmission and distribution of electrical energy

3. Flood control.4. Promotion and control of navigation

in the river and its tributaries and channels.

5. Promotion of afforestation and control of soil erosion.

6. Promotion of public health, agricultural, industrial, economic and general well being of the river valley and its area of operation.

**For more details see Mahesh Chand & Puri—Chapter.10. Experiments in inter state planning

Hierarchy of water shed /River valleyStream water shed form a convenient areal unit for planning. A large river basin like Cauvery can be broken in to hierarchic system of smaller basins.Each smaller basin exactly fits within the next large unit.

Order of the watersheds can be designated. Stracher’s system designates the fingertip tributaries as order 1.The channels formed by the junction of two first order channels are Designated as order 2.and the channels formed by the junction of two second order channels are designated as order 3.and so on.

What is a watershed?A watershed is all the land and water area which contributes runoff to a common point. The watershed above any point on a defined drainage channel is therefore all the land and water areas which drain through that point. A watershed refers to the geographical area from where the water comes, with all its existing social, economic and physiological characteristcs

138

Watershed management is the participatory process of guiding and organizing land use and use of other resources in a watershed for sustainable provision of desired goods and services to the people without adversely affecting soil and water resources. Embedded in these concepts is the recognition of the interrelationships among land use, soil and water, the linkages between uplands and downstream areas and the interests of the different stakeholders and water users. What is watershed management?Watershed management includes

Capacity development and training (human resource development, community development, institutional development)Natural resources management (soil and land management, water and forest management, rural energy management)Improving farming systems (crop management, pasture/fodder development, livestock management) Sustainable rural livelihoods (farm and non-farm value addition activities)Conflict management (e.g among social groups, between upstream and downstream users)

Watershed management integratesVarious forms in which water is available (e.g. rainfall, rivers, lakes, groundwater) with forms of water storage and water harvestingCompeting water use sectors (agriculture, households, industry, ecosystems and tourism) Relevant policy fields (agricultural policy, forest policy, rural development, human development, social policy)Watersheds with water catchments and river basins


Water shed is an area, which drains into a river. Hierarchies of watersheds are then hierarchy of river.The largest water shed is formed by third level tributary, within which the second and first level watersheds fall.

Watersheds as units of planning have several advantages:Edaphic changes in soil and vegetation reflect location within the watershed, as the physical features of a basin directly affect the hydrologic characteristics of the streams

draining it. Water sheds, therefore form the appropriate units for intervention in flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power generation, soil conservation, water, management, crop planning etc. WS is an ideal aerial unit for planned development of natural resources. Watersheds offer a complete eco systemic

balance between topography, rain fall, vegetation and animal life.

Watersheds contribute a spatial eco-system in which the smallest watershed is originally linked to largest watershed.

138


If the watershed resources are used without keeping this eco-systemic interaction in view, the system is rendered unbalanced and several negative forces do not allow the rebuilding of resources like soil ,vegetation etc.

Identification of watersheds for micro-level planningWatersheds can be different sizes depending upon the order of the stream. Eg. Cauvery basin –within it there is Kabini basin.The question is which size of the watershed should be used in integrated rural area planning?The optimum size of a micro watershed largely depends on the specific emphasis of the development program.If the program aims at integrated area development as in the case with DPAP, the emphasis is clearly around optimum utilization and conservation of land and water resources. Based on the nature of soil and vegetative cover, surface runoff of the rain water may be quickened or slowed down.As watersheds increase in size, they become more complex with regard to slope, topography, soil and vegetative cover.Watershed management is primarily concerned with planning the land use to landscape- land use planning is closely linked with the family activity.The basic unit for micro-level planning should be a farming locality within a radius of five kilometers.The optimum size of a micro watershed for integrated rural development should therefore be no more than 10000 hectares. A size between 5000 to 10000 hectares would possibly the optimum size.The actual size of the micro-watershed should, however be determined in accordance with the topographic characteristics of soil texture and composition, vegetative cover and the existing land use.Funds available for micro watersheds planning are limited – hence it can be better utilized in a small area to restore the ecological balance.As the ultimate purpose of watershed management is to improve the quality of human life, the size of the population should also taken into account while determining the optimum size of the watershedIn areas of high population density, the higher area limit and in the area of sparse population, the higher area limit should the deciding criteria

Steps in watershed PlanningAfter identification the next step is to prepare a land use plan. Land use plan is to be prepared as under:

1. Contour mapping of 5 mts interval2. Existing land use map preparation. This map

should show the land under forest, pastures, field crops, and other crops like plantation, fruits etc.

3. A map showing the soil types.4. A map showing the streams within the watershed, all tanks, all canals, and their

distributaries.5. A map showing all areas irrigated by various methods eg. wells, canals, tanks etc 6. Map showing all human settlements – rural/urban with important economic and

social facilities such as health Centre, schools, vet.hospitals, drinking water,

138


communication (post & telegraph) facilities and other public institutions like co-operatives, banks, police station etc.

7. A map showing the road net work with bus facilitiesall this means that watershed planning is not only a device to conserve the land and water resources and to make the best use of them, but also to carry out an integrated physical and socio- economic development planning exercise within an ecological frame work.Objectives of watershed planning Objectives can be any one or more of the following.1. Conservation of moisture in rain fed area for optimal utilization.2. To check soil erosion.3. To control problem of drainage, salinity and alkalinity.4. To control flood 5. To check siltation prevention in reservoirs.6. Collections of surplus run off in farm ponds and its recycling for crop use.7. To recharge grounds water or increase water table in wells.8. Collections of surplus run off for meeting the drinking water requirement of cattle,

and human population in desert areas.9. To improve the main and on- farm irrigation systems for increased productivity and

increased area under irrigation.

Size of the watershed depends upon the objectives: Planning for soil and water conservation; by raising contour bunds to conserve

rainwater—optimum size 500-700 hectares. Collection of surface run off for drinking water—farm ponds or tanks Flood control—large size river basins. Peoples participation

Mechanism for peoples participation;Human and cattle population directly and indirectly affected by what happens in the watershed. They depend for their basic necessities on watershed. Drought lead to acute water scarcity—water and fodder has to be transported—flood cause damage –cattle and crop loses can damage the economy.Contour bunding cut across farmer’s field—so they object—field bunding is welcomed.Watershed management societiesLivestock management societiesWater conservation—Vegetative, mechanical.

Objectives of Command area development program Utilization of ground water resources.Land shaping of watershed areas for integrated crop planning Development of field channel and field drainage system within the farmers block to prevent water logging and to utilize water resources more efficiently.Determining and enforcing appropriate cropping pattern for the various blocks according to the availability of water.Preparing an input (fertilizer, credit) planConceiving and implementation of land leveling, soil conservation and aforestation action plans

138


Problems in command area projects: Legal On farm development requires legislation on re-alignment of farm boundaries, land

leveling and land shaping. Implementation of appropriate cropping pattern requires legislative support. Uniform legislation regarding irrigation control and regulation of groundwater is

required to be enacted.Technical Salinity problem and its control Seepage from canals Problems of water distribution at the tail end of the canal Consolidation and re-alignment of field boundaries.Administrative Inadequacy, misutilization and non-utilization of funds; cost escalation, lack of

investigation, delay in decision making. Land acquisition problems Non-realization of anticipated crop pattern –inadequate field channels, land

preparation, neglect of maintenance, mal-distribution of water supply, lack of departmental co-ordination.

Personal Lack of personal planning ,recruitment and deployment Lack of appropriate training policy and extension system

What is Watershed? A watershed can be defined as the drainage basin or catchment area of a particular stream or river. Simply put, it refers to the area from where the water flows to a particular drainage system, like a river or stream, comes from.Why Watershed Development? People and their environment are interdependent. Any change in the surrounding environment directly affects the people living therein. A degraded environment results in a degraded quality of life of the people. Thus efforts to reduce poverty and improve the standard of living of the people must aim at improving the environment they live in. The environment does not recognize people determined administrative boundaries. A watershed provides a natural environmental unit for planning a developmental initiative.What is Watershed Development? Watershed development refers to the conservation, regeneration and the judicious use of all the resources - natural (land, water, plants, animals) and human - within a particular watershed. Watershed management tries to bring about the best possible balance in the environment between natural resources on the one side, and human and other living beings on the other.Components of Watershed Development • Human Resource Development (Community Development)• Soil and Land Management• Water Management• Crop Management• Aforestation• Pasture/Fodder Development• Livestock Management• Rural Energy Management• Farm and non-farm value addition activitiesAll these components are interdependent and interactive.Why People's Participation? The environment is a living space on which the human community living within that area depends on for its livelihood. When the economic condition of a community deteriorates it leads to over-exploitation and degradation of natural resources which, in turn, further exacerbates poverty. It is thus necessary for people to see the relationship between their poverty and the degraded environment they live in.Thus, just as human beings and their activities are the cause of environmental destruction, it is only they who can restore to health the ruined environment. Hence there can be no sustainable natural resources management unless it involves the participation of all the inhabitants of the concerned environment / area in an active manner.

138


UNIT IV- TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING

The major features that stood in the optimum development of urban centers:1. High percentage of undeveloped or vacant land within the corporate limit.2. Unbalanced, competing and deleterious use of land.3. Lack of common facilities like transportation system, housing, water supply,

sanitation and adequate open spaces etc.4. Lack of strong and wide economic space.5. Uncontrolled peripheral development.6. High cost of land and development further aggravated by the speculative element.

Other deficiencies noted:1. Agglomeration in large size towns of both industry and other work opportunities thus

attracting larger population movements towards them.2. Lack of incentives and resources for small towns to develop; most of them being

overgrown villages at present with a sizeable percentage of working force engaged in agriculture.

3. Because of the low economic level of the migrant labor, generally unskilled, creation of slums in urban areas.

4. Because of the low literacy and economic level, the social characteristics of migrant population tend to be incompatible with urban ways of life.

Social and economic aims of Town Planning 1. Socially successful planning tends to make people’s life happier, because it results in

physical environment which is conducive to health; facilitates social intercourse and gives visual attractiveness

2. It increases wealth, by efficiently arranging communication routes to carry out human activities in a more efficient and less wasteful manner through proper spatial arrangement.

If town planning is not there Industries may spring up with less regard to social convenience and before roads are

built Houses may be constructed and occupied even before water supply and drainage

facilities are provided Schools may be located in total disregard of the population which uses that school Roads may be widened without long lasting effect.

Town planning includes village planning, town planning, city planning, metropolitan planning, regional planning and national physical planning. This wider aspect is ignored and town planning became synonymous with plan for streets, houses and civic amenities.In its actual practice town planning may seem to take away the land of somebody, deprive somebody of building a house, or place restrictions on the number of storey to built etc.

138


Town Planning meaning and componentsTown and country planning might be described as the art and science of ordering the use of land and the character and siting of buildings and communication routes, so as to secure the maximum practicable degree of economy, convenience and beauty.

Characteristics of successful Town Planning Promotion of accessibility Employment of resources as economically as possible The separation of incompatible land uses from each other and association of

compatible or mutually helpful uses. Carrying out of all developments in a visually pleasant and practical manner

The principal of good neighborliness—the right to do what they like with their property subject to the limitation that their action should not be harmful, either to themselves or to the neighborhood—This neighborliness recognizes the need for planning legislation.

In the beginning civic designs through planning provided colour and texture of the fabric of environment. With the gradual diffusion of ownership of land, such planning has given place to building codes and legislative measures to assemble diffused ownership as a unified whole amenable for development/redevelopment

At macro level—a tool for appropriate assembly of land as optimal planning units

Civic designAt micro level—detailed design of the buildings as well as their spatial relationship

Good neighborliness and civic design form the warp and resource allocation the weft of the fabric of planning. Planning legislation will then the loom on which the fabric is woven and the administration the salesman.

Urban Planning Control within the city Urban planning refers to those activities by which a metropolis systematically

undertakes to control its spatial functional pattern

Background factors and problemsSome important factors that complicate the tasks of planning for a metropolis are discussed under 5 headings Individual control of small parcels of urban land. Arbitrary political boundaries. Irregularity of environmental sites. Heritage of past construction. Anticipation of future change

138


1.Individual control of small parcels of urban land;Within the city both govt. and private citizens own parts of land area. Private Citizens own 55% & govt. owns about 45% of the urban land (i.e. public streets, parks, play grounds & govt. buildings). Private ownership (i.e. Residences, stores, factories, commercial, recreation)

Why municipal legislation is necessary to control the undesirable consequences of private ownership of small parcels of urban land1. A owner may build a store or factory in an residential area there by decreasing the

value of nearby houses.2. In a deteriorated urban neighborhood, remodeling of old houses or to build a new one

depends upon the neighbors willingness ie. Ready to do the same3. A owner who owns single strategic plot may either block a development effort or

may delay it by demanding a price considerably higher than the ordinary market value.

(So municipal regulation is necessary to control this)

2. Arbitrary political boundariesAn adequate urban plan covers not only the built up area of the city but also such parts of the unoccupied hinterland as need to be controlled in order to secure both orderly future growth of the metropolis and reasonable protection of its residences. Lack of control over the peripheral land may result in

During a real estate boom, private owners in various sub divisions may break up tracts of farm land into town sized building plots. Such sub dividing activity distorts local land values and interferes with ordinary urban growth.

Houses built in unzoned area, may later surrounded by cheaply constructed homes or hedged in by objectionable factories and other buildings.

Traditional political boundaries make difficult, the control of haphazard urban growth in the unincorporated fringe area of the metropolis.

3. Irregularity of the environmental siteEvery urban site has its own unique features Underlying soil and terrain conditions has different advantages and disadvantages

for various kinds of buildings. Topography affects the routes of transportation. Transportation in turn influences

the location of factories, stores and residences. Breaks transportation eg. Land to water vice versa. Some parts of the city provide better amenities than other eg. Beach—exceptional

view.

4. Heritage of past constructionTown planning activity may be limited or modified by the heritage of past construction.Unfortunately, the heritage of the past does not always satisfy contemporary needs.Eg. Narrow streets were enough for horse and buggy days cannot handle the huge volume of today’s motor traffic. Factories once properly located finds themselves surrounded by residences.Cost factor inhibits remodeling of the built up area e.g. widening of the narrow streetsSo the urban planners leave this condition as it is and effect changes slowly.

138


5. Anticipation of future change:

Major aspects of the master plan:The master plan deals with the natural city as a whole. It offers a broad picture of the projected spatial pattern..Three aspects of the master plan are:-1. City beautification as emphasized by the architects.2. Transportation and safety as stressed by the engineers3. Land use pattern as emphasized by economists, geographers and human ecologists.

General land use patternPlanning for effective land use within the city involves decisions about; The various types of utilization that requires distinctive sub areas. The percentage of total occupied space that should be apportioned to each types

and grade of utilization. The proper location for each type of functional area.

Wholesale

Stores Retail

Storage and switching facility

Private land use

Factories

Light

Heavy

Nuisance

Medium

LowResidences

High

ParksPlaygrounds

Civic centersRoads

Public Land Use

138


Percentage of land utilized by various functions exhibited considerable regularity and that suggests that urban planners may employ them as rough guidelines in apportioning percentages urban land to various categories of utilization

Spatial locations for various functions

An ideal master plan places every sub area of a city in a location so related to every other, thereby The total cost of moving men and material from place to place is minimized. Safety and beauty are maximized. Constructive social contracts are streamlined.Even though a planner must begin with the existing pattern, he has numerous divisions to make regarding future changes.1. What additional industrial sites will be required and where should they be located?2. What changes should be made in the number and size of commercial areas?3. What existing residential areas should be altered in type or grade?4. How much additional vacant space will be needed for residences and where?5. What provisions should be made in various areas for playgrounds, parks, public

and semi public places?

Industrial locationWhere –near the central business district? Along lines of transportation? At periphery or nearby hinterland?

Care has to be taken to 1. Prevent loss of property values by wrongly intermixing industries and residences.2. Clustering of independent industries3. To provide heavy transportation services to industries4. To prepare for the expansion and migration of industries within the city it self

Commercial locationWhat? –Major shopping and luxury goods. Shopping goods and convenience goods. Parking facility Commercial areas for each residential area.

Urban land use; (Bartholeama study)Occupied urban space was split among various functions as follows;

Average Residences 39 % 27-59 % (Single family: 36%, Two family: 2%, Multiple:1% )Stores & other commercial 2 % 01-04 %UtilizationIndustry 6 % 03-11 %Rail roads 5 % 03- 08 %Streets 34 % 21-59 %Parks & play grounds 6 % 01-19 %Other public and semi- Public facilities 8% 01-15%**The percentage may vary according to the function performed by the city

138


Residential locationThe other functions performed by these locations should be taken care of. ie. Education, Worship and Recreation. Streets and transportation facilities;The major function of urban transportation is that of connecting one area with another area, so that men and materials can move with greater safety and at less cost

Railroads. Bus lineFacilities which link city with Truck linehinterland and foreign areas Private vehicles

Air lines Wire, Cables, Radio & TV Local streets

Water pipes Facilities which link various parts Sewers of the city Telephone & power lines

Rail lines

Types: Multi purpose main highways High speed expressways By-pass routes

Streets Neighborhood streets Scenic parkways

Three aspects of effective street use; Traffic counts and calculation of street requirement Elimination of bottle necks and dangerous intersections. Special high speed express ways and by-pass routes.

City Beautification;Federal Buildings

Architecture State BuildingsParks

Slum EliminationModification of built up area Preplanned peripheral areas

Urban planning education**As the urban societies grew more complex, the responsibilities of urban planners whose task is to guide the changing urban area, becomes ominous.

**The urban planner’s task is not confined to only “preparing and carrying out a plan for the use and development of land. It also includes giving present and future generation a chance of satisfying living.

**The initial period of planning was cast within the concept of “city beautiful” syndrome largely arising out of the concerns of the professional architects. Urban planning then was synonymous with the physical development of the urban centers.

138


**Urban planning profession gained legitimacy through various statutory provisions concerning the preparation of master plans and the institutionalization planning as a govt. activity. The famous triad of beauty, health and convenience defined the planner’s task.

**There is a growing school of thought in the west that views the structure of the city including its land use and activity patterns, as the result of capital in pursuit of profit. Planning in this framework is considered “as a historically specific and socially necessary response to the self disorganizing tendencies of privatized capitalist, social and the property relations as they appear in the urban space.

**Three major orientations in urban planning –1. Traditional role of physical development; 2. Analyst role of understanding the complex socio-economic urban system; 3. Advocate role of working with and for the people, particularly the poor.

Legislative frame work for urban planning: Whether state legislations are competent to make a town planning law? (Maneklal &Makwana ). The answer is “Yes”.

Array of legislations relating to town planning & development.Municipal Acts.Improve Trusts Act.Development Authority Act.----------------------- acts created Slum Clearance and Authority Act.--------------- for someHousing Board Acts.----------------------------------specialPeripheral / Ribbon Development Control Act.---purposeWater Supply & Sewerage Boards Acts.Pollution Acts.Urban Land Ceiling Acts. Urban Arts Commission Acts.

Town Planning in Tamilnadu;Tamilnadu Town and Country Planning Act.1971, provisions to prepare hierarchy of development plans at three different levels. Regional plans. Urban (Master) Plans. Local (Detailed Development ) PlansTamilnadu is divided in to eight panning regions-ie. Regional planning areas.District Collector –ChairmenRegional Deputy Director of Town and Country Planning.—Member Secretary.They graft plans after wide public discussion.

ZoningZoning is the division of community in to different zones or districts according to present and potential use of properties for the purpose of controlling and directing the use and development of these properties. It is concerned primarily with the use of land and buildings, the height and bulk of the buildings, proportion of a lot which buildings may cover, and the diversity of the population of the given area. Zoning is an instrument of of

138


plan implementation, deals primarily with use and development of privately owned land and buildings rather than with public land buildings and facilities.

CHALLENGES IN URBAN PLANNING FOR LOCAL BODIES IN INDIA

The urban population of India has rapidly increased in recent years. In 1961 about 79 million persons lived in urban areas of the country, by 2001, their number had gone up to over 285 million, an increase of over 350 percent in the last four decades, which will increase to over 400 million by the year 2011 and 533 million by the year 2021. In 1991 there were 23 metropolitan cities, which have increased to 35 in 2001. As a result, most urban settlements are characterized by shortfalls in housing and water supply, inadequate sewerage, traffic congestion, pollution, poverty and social unrest making urban governance a difficult task.

Urban Local Bodies [ULBs] which are statutorily responsible for provision and maintenance of basic infrastructure and services in cities and towns are under fiscal stress. To even operate and maintain existing services, let alone augment them, would be difficult. There has been little or no increase in their revenue base; user charges continue to be low or non-existent. Faced with such a situation the ULBs barring a few exceptions are becoming increasingly dependent on the higher levels of government for their operation and maintenance requirements. What is worse, many ULBs have accumulated ‘large’ debts and face serious problems in servicing them. Besides the restriction to a small resource base poor planning process, lack of periodical revision of municipal tax rates / user charges, and poor information system and records management are some of the basic weaknesses in the present municipal administration.

Constitutional Amendment Act 74 The CAA74 mandates compulsory reconstitution of municipal bodies within a stipulated time frame, thus ensuring continuity of local representatives. The twelfth schedule of the CAA74 has listed 18 functions and responsibilities to local bodies. These are: 1. Urban planning, including town planning; 2. Regulation of land use and construction of buildings; 3. Planning for economic and social development; 4. Roads and bridges; 5. Water supply for domestic, industrial, and commercial purposes; 6. Public health, sanitation, conservancy, and solid waste management; 7. Fire services; 8. Urban forestry, protection of the environment, and promotion of ecological

aspects; 9. Safeguarding the interests of weaker sections of society, including the

handicapped and mentally retarded; 10. Slum improvement and up-gradation; 11. Urban poverty alleviation; 12. Provision of urban amenities and facilities such as parks, gardens, and

playgrounds; 13. Promotion of cultural, educational and aesthetic aspects; 14. Burials and burial grounds; cremation grounds and electric crematoria; 15. Cattle pounds, prevention of cruelty to animals; 16. Vital statistics, including registration of births and deaths;

138


17. Public amenities including street lighting, parking lots, bus-stop, and public conveniences;

18. Regulation of slaughterhouses and tanneries.

Importantly the CAA74 expressly recognizes a role for the ULBs within the constitutional framework and provides for devolution of financial powers from the state government for strengthening of municipal finances. The CAA74 also provides for constitution of Ward Committees in municipalities with a population of more than 3 lakh, Metropolitan Planning Committees and District Planning Committees for consolidation and preparation of plans of spatial, economic and social development. From a "top down” approach, the emphasis has thus shifted to the" bottom up" approach.

In view of the challenges facing by ULBs the planners have to prepare themselves for a new role and much wider responsibilities. As a bridge between the civil society and the politico-economic structure, the planners have to perform the role of the catalysts of change. With the ongoing globalization, economic liberalization and devolution of power to local bodies, gone are the days of armchair professionals. In the context of decentralization of power from Central / State Governments to local levels, there is a clear need to strengthen the Urban Local Bodies and endowing them with the finances, commensurate with their assigned responsibility. The experience indicates that the first and foremost priority should be to strengthen the local bodies and improve their performances that have the primary responsibility to provide urban services. This would involve the following key initiatives:- The introduction of short and medium-term, Integrated Action planning, to

complement comprehensive long-term objectives. Simplification of plans and procedures.

138


Assets inventory for optimum utilization and the increase of the revenue base. A new urban land policy, to match with the national Housing and Habitat

Policy. Whereby the local authorities act as the facilitators and harness the resources of private sector / Community.

Upgrading technology and environment focus for infrastructure services and transportation.

Exploring new options and public-private partnership for development and financing of infrastructure, land development, housing, conservation, and environmental improvement.

Networking with international and national urban programs, e.g. Citynet Healthy Cities, UMP etc.

Mandatory performance management system and MIS. Networking with NGO’s CBO’s and private sector for planning, management

and maintenance.

Issues in Urban Planning It is now being recognized that cities are the engines of growth at both regional and national level. To facilitate and sustain this growth, cities have to provide both a high quality of life and an efficient infrastructure for economic activities.

Environment management and protection strategy addresses the critical environmental problems, which mainly concerns preservation of lakes and water bodies, its catchments area and its water quality and land use management in catchment areas. The other environmental issues relate to the disposal and treatment of urban waste and it’s recycling and the socio-economic problems caused by the displacement of population, in context to future city spread. Environment management of lakes and water bodies are vulnerable to urban pressure in its close vicinity. It is essential to enforce land use control measures in the catchment areas to prevent further environmental degradation and thereby achieve desired level of sustainability. The sustained efforts are needed for plan implementation to improve the quality of city life. Hence an effective plan implementation strategy needs to be evolved to achieve the following objectives

1. Protect natural environment. 2. Conservation of areas of cultural heritage. 3. Optimize land use and land utilization 4. Provide services and infrastructure 5. Participatory approach for supply of land and infrastructure development.

Urban planning is basically resource generation, resource development and resource management exercise. The efficiency of urban settlements largely depends upon how well they are planned, how economically they are developed and how efficiently they are managed. Planning inputs largely govern the efficiency level of human settlements. There is a widely held view that the Master planning methods adopted over the last few decades have not produced a satisfactory physical environment. The urban development planning process in the past has been unduly long and has been largely confined to the detailing of land use aspects. The plans have paid inadequate attention to the provision of trunk infrastructure, environmental conservation and financing issues. They have been unrealistic and have not been accompanied by investment programs and capital budgets. Integrated urban development planning approach, taking into account regional, state and national strategies, and spatial, functional and other linkages between human settlements,

138


has not been given much recognition. Also the planning and plan implementation processes have not paid adequate attention to the integration of land use and transport planning. The fact that transport is a key determinant of land use and “leads”development is sometimes ignored.

The Five Year plans laid stress on the need to undertaken town planning and evolve a National Town Planning Act so as to provide for zoning and land use, control of ribbon development, location of industries, clearance of slums, civic and diagnostic surveys and preparation of Master plans. Although a significant step in urban development was undertaken in the Plan in the form of Central assistance to the states for the preparation of master plans for selected areas, comprehensive action was not taken by the states for the adoption and implementation of the plans. The urban development planning should, essentially, be supportive of the economic development in the country. At present, hardly 20 percent of the urban centers have some sort of a Master Plan, which is many cases is just a policy document. It is estimated that there are about 1200 master plans prepared by various Agencies responsible for plan preparation but their implementation is not encouraging. The implementation of master plan facilitates the orderly and planned development of cities in a sustainable manner, which would ultimately help in good governance.

The Master plan Approach – Concepts, Objectives and Functions The master plan, which was perceived to be a process rather than a conclusive statement, provides guidelines for the physical development of the city and guides people in locating their investments in the city. In short, Master Plan is a design for the physical, social, economic and political frame work for the city, which greatly improves the quality of Urban Governance also.

The functions of the Master Plan / Development plan: i. To guide development of a city is an orderly manner so as to improve the

quality of life of the people ii. Organize and coordinate the complex relationships between urban land uses

iii. Chart a course for growth and change, be responsive to change and maintain its validity over time and space, and be subject to continual review

iv. Direct the physical development of the city in relation to its social and economic characteristics based on comprehensive surveys and studies on the present status and the future growth prospects; and

v. Provide a resource mobilization plan for the proposed development works.

Critique of the Master Plan Approach There is a widely held view that the Master Planning methods adopted over the last few decades have not produced a satisfactory physical environment. The urban development planning process in the past has been unduly long and has been largely confined to the dealing of land use aspects.

Criticisms of the Master Plan ApproachThe major criticisms of the Master Plan approach adopted in the country are as follows: Plan Preparation Techniques: The Master plan details out the urbanized and urbanisable areas under its jurisdiction and suggests land use up to the neighborhood level. The tendency to over-plan the urban

138


environment, with minute detailing, has resulted in lack of flexibility and has hindered individual self-expression. Plan perspective: The plan projects and ’end state’ scenario for 20-25 years and is not detailed enough for short and medium-terms actions. Static Plan: The plan is mostly static and not amendable to quick mid-course corrections. Delays: Inordinate delays in Master Plan preparation and approval and, in addition, difficulty in obtaining possession of land sought to be acquired for the purpose is one of the main handicaps in the speedy and successful implementation of the Master Plan. Growth of the City:The efficacy of the master Plan is adversely effected by the divergence between the precept and practices concerning the preparation of the Master Plan and its implementation. Ineffective Public Participation: The mechanism for public participation is ineffective in the process of development planning, in both its preparation and implementation. It is more top-down than a bottom-up approach. Weak information Base: Master Plan preparation is undertaken with a very weak information base especially on socio-economic parameters, housing and environment. Impractical Physical standards: The plans prescribe impractical densities and layout high standards in an effort to improve the quality of life in a city. These are generally higher than what the city population, particularly the poor, can afford. Lack of Financing Plan: Estimates of financial outlay do not match the development works envisaged in the Master Plan. The strategies for raising resources required for plan implementation are never an integral part of the plan. Spatial Planning vis-à-vis Development Planning:Urban planning in India has been totally over-shadowed by its spatial content instead of realization of social and economic objectives. Town planning exercises have tended to concentrate on physical order and environmental quality of city, and have been isolated from the mainstream of development planning, decision-making and implementation strategies. Land Policy and Management: The absence of machinery for systematic and continuous collection of data on the movement of land and tenement prices undermines the implementation of the master Plan. Private Sector Participation:Through a significant portion of the development is due to the initiative of the private sector, this factor is not recognized in the Plan. People’s Needs:The Master Plan does not incorporate the exact needs and priorities of the people. Instead of reflecting the aspirations of the community at large, the plan more or less reflects the values of the administrators and planners.

138


Regulatory mechanism: The regulatory mechanisms in the Master Plan are to enable better management of the city. However, development control mechanisms are observed more in breach than in compliance. Plan Implementation: The root-cause of the urban maladies has been the divorcing of the plan preparation from plan implementation. Ineffective plan Monitoring:An Institutional and information system does not, generally, exist for plan monitoring. Since the budgetary system does not explicitly take into account the requirement of plan implementation, problem of resources are not periodically highlighted.

Constitution (74th) Amendment Act. The Constitution (74th) Amendment Act, 1992 provides for a democratic and participatory planning process so as to incorporate the needs of the people, particularly the poor and socially disadvantaged, in the planning process. The act stipulates the setting up to District planning Committees (DPCs) and Metropolitan Planning Committees (MPCs) for integration of spatial and economic development and rural and urban planning. This is in recognition of the need for integrated regional planning with due attention to regional and local infrastructure, environmental conservation and investment planning and their spatial and other impacts. The DPCs / MPCs need to be constituted under the State Zilla Panchayat / Regional and Town Planning Acts. A three tier planning structure is envisaged in the states – Panchayats / Municipalities level, district and metropolitan level and state level. Under this framework, Panchayats/ Municipalities would prepare plans for their areas, which would be consolidated at the district level in the form of draft district development plans. The metropolitan development plan would be prepared by the MPCs. All district and metropolitan development plans would then lead to the formulation of a plan at the state level.

A. District Planning Committee The constitution of DPCs recognizes the need for integrated regional planning based on the investment patterns, its spatial impact and development. The DPCs should be vested with enough powers to undertake the following functions, besides preparation of draft development plan for the district. i. Preparation of draft development plans including spatial plan for the district,

keeping in view matters of common interest between Panchayats and municipalities.

ii. Advice and assistance to local bodies in preparation of development plans and its effective implementation.

iii. Coordination and monitoring of the implementation of District Development plans.

iv. Allocation of resources to local bodies for planning and implementation of local level projects contained in the District Development plans.

B. Metropolitan Area planning committee.

The constitution of MPCs in every metropolitan area under Article 243 ZE of the 74th Amendment accords constitutional recognition to metro-regional planning when seen in

138


the context of agglomeration economies, a metro region is the most preferred area for investment in economic activities and infrastructure but these areas are normally deficient in spatial planning inputs. The functions to be assigned to MPC are as follows:

i. Preparation of draft development plan for the metropolitan areas. ii. Spatial coordination of plans prepared by the municipalities and panchayats in

the metro area and recommending modifications in local area plan, if any taking an overall view.

iii. Advice and assistance to local bodies in preparation of development plans. iv. Monitoring effective implementation of approved development plan of the

region. v. Undertaking formulation and implementation of projects involving provision of

infrastructure such as major roads, trunk services, electricity, telecommunications, etc.

The 12th Schedule of the Constitution (74th Amendment) Act lists the 18 functions of the municipalities which among others include: (I) urban planning including town planning; (ii) regulation of land use and construction of buildings; and (iii) planning for economic and social development. In this regard, the state governments could be more specific and definite in assigning functions to the local bodies, In the absence of clarity in assignment of functions, the State Finance Commission would not be able to assess the fiscal needs of and allocate adequate resources to the municipalities. For a rational integration of spatial and economic development, functions related to spatial and socioeconomic planning and development should be assigned to Urban Local Bodies (ULBs). To facilitate the municipalities to discharge these functions, a provision could be made in the State Municipal Acts for devolution of necessary power and authority along with financial resources and manpower. For an effective urban planning system, there is the need to have a package of inter-related plans at three levels namely long-term perspective structure plan (20-25 years) short term integrated infrastructure Development plan (5 year) and Annual Action plan as part of Infrastructure Development plan. The short-term integrated Infrastructure plan and Annual plan could be in the form of “rolling” plans to enable the ULBs to continuously review and monitor the plan, and to update it every year / five years. The aim should be to make urban planning system as a continuous process. Each level of plan must include measures for infrastructure development and environmental conservation: Perspective Structure Plan:

The long-term Perspective Structure Plan could be prepared by the MPCs broadly indicating goals, policies and strategies for spatio-economics development of the urban settlement. The perspective plan may include:

o Physical characteristics and natural resources: o Direction and magnitude of growth and development – area and population

(Demography) o Arterial / grid road network and mass transit corridors with modular development

block. o Infrastructure network – water, sewage, drainage, roads, bus and truck terminals,

rail network, etc. o Broad compatible and mixed land use packages and zones : o Community open space system and organization of public spaces :

138


o Environmental conservation and preservation of areas of architectural, heritage and and ecological importance ;

o Major issues and development constraints; o Financial estimates and fund flow patterns; and o Policy and plans for EWS housing.

Infrastructure Development Plan:

Integrated infrastructure Development Plan should be prepared by ULBs in the context of the approved Perspective Plan. The scope of the Plan should cover an assessment of existing situation, prospects and priorities and development including employment generation programs, economic base, transportation and land use, housing and land development, environmental improvement and conservation programs. The development plan may include.

o Identification of gaps and shortcomings in the delivery of municipal services ; o Identification of service and remunerative projects and their prioritization along

with capital budgeting and investment programs; and o Housing and land development programs, including identification of areas for

residential and non-residential development and development of trunk infrastructure.

Action Plan:

Within the framework of Development Plan, Annual Action plans for the urban areas should be prepared by the ULBs specifying the projects and schemes with costing and cash flow for both on-going and new projects. The Annual action plan should provide and in-built system for implementation of the Development Plan. In this plan various urban development schemes should be integrated spatially and financially. Annual plan may consist of :

o targets to be achieved – physical and fiscal; o fund flow ; and o project design and specification, including tender document for implementation.

Projects and Schemes:

As part of the Development plans and Action plans, projects and schemes within towns / cities could be taken up for any area / activity related to housing, commercial centers, industrial areas, social and cultural infrastructure, transport, environment, urban renewal etc. by governmental bodies / local agencies / private sector and through integer-governmental public private-partnership. Such projects could be both long-term and short-term and in conformity with the development requirements of the respective town / city.

Challenges for local bodies: The existing municipal laws are totally inadequate to enable to ULBs to discharge the new responsibilities delegated to them under the Constitutional (74th Amendment) Act. Although the state governments have amended their municipal Acts, as a follow - up of the 74th Amendment, the amended acts do not specifically assign functions to the local bodies especially urban including town planning. The following measures may be undertaken to enable the ULBs to serve as agencies for plan preparation, enforcement and implementation:

138


i. Clear division of functional responsibilities and linkage among different levels of government to ensure upward and downward accountability and to enable the SFCs in their constitutional task of devolution of funds to ULBs.

ii. Division of municipal functions into essential functions, agency functions, and joint functions with state and central governments.

iii. Avoiding the traditional distinction between ‘obligatory’ and ‘discretionary’ functions since such classification results in uncertainties and non-transparent system of municipal accountability.

iv. Essential functions of municipalities to include urban planning, including town planning regulation of land use and construction of buildings and planning for economics and social development and amendments to the Municipal Acts.

As an effective alternative, the authority to prepare urban development plans may be placed with municipalities under the town and country planning laws. The planning functions could be undertaken by the municipalities under the state Town and Country planning Act in states where such power has not been provided in the Municipal Acts. A standing planning Committee may be constituted to assist the ULBs in this task and the members of the committee could include representatives of elected members, administrators and professional experts. The chairman of the local authority could head the standing planning committee and the municipal Town Planner could be the member secretary.

It is necessary to build effective legislative support for the preparation of 3-tier Development plans discussed earlier. The Town & Country planning Acts would have to be modified to incorporate formulation of these plans along-with their definition, scope and contents, provision could be made in the Act to empower the state Town and Country Planning Department to prepare and get approved the perspective plan and / or Development plan, following the prescribed procedure at the cost of the concerned in case of failure by the ULBs to initiate actions to prepare the Plans within the stipulated time period.

The efficiency in approval of plans could be increased by providing a clause in the Act allowing for automatic approval in situations where the approval or rejection with reasons, is not communicated within the stipulated time by the appropriate authority. The local authority should carry out the modifications suggested by the Town Planning Department and re-submit the modified plan. But at the same time, undisputed sections / part of the draft Development plan could be processed, got approved and implemented.. Provision could be made for approval of Annual Plans by the local authority and that of the projects and schemes formulated in accordance with the approved development plan and Development Promotion Rules, by the Municipal Town Planners with appropriate accountability. The notice of preparation of development plan may be linked with section 4 of the land acquisition Act. 1984 in the municipal / Town planning Acts so that any land required for compulsory acquisition is notified as per the Act. Consequently compensation for land would be as on the date of the publication of the draft Development Plan and this would minimize the speculative elements. Similarly, the publication of the notice of the final development plan may be linked with section 6 declaration under the Act. Appropriate legal support to the land assembly efforts of the private sector should be provided to facilitate private sector participation in the

138


implementation process.

Development plans, in the past, were prepared in the context of centralized planning. This context is changing in the era of liberalization where cities have to identify their competitive advantage for growth and development. Decentralization of development planning to the local level, under the constitutional (74th Amendment) Act, bring with it the responsibility of resource and financial management.

Modification needed in urban planning

For a more dynamic urban planning exercise, the following modifications in the planning approach are recommended: Flexibility:

Plans must have flexibility to provide for ever-growing and ever-expanding city boundaries and provide quality of life to all inhabitants. The plan should be flexible to respond not only to the present needs but, also, the changing conditions in foreseeable, future.

Role of Actors: People’s participation in preparation of policies, perspective plan, development plan and annual plans should be ensured through elected representatives in the municipal council / corporation and ward committees.

Information system: A well maintained information system can make possible the fine-tuning of the plan proposals at the various stages of implementation of the plan according to the changing urban scenario.

Urbanisable Areas: The development potential may be assessed for the areas located in the periphery of the developed areas. A profile of the development potential and the possibility of optimizing the existing infrastructure should determine the prioritization of development of these areas.

Growth Centers: Given the paucity of resources, it would be more feasible and desirable to promote strategic development initiatives in the selected secondary cities, growth center and their hinterlands. In the growth centers, the location of infrastructural and environmental services could form the ‘core’ of the Development Plan.

Policy Guidelines: Policy guidelines notified under law, can help in identifying priority areas, subsequent modifications in the plans and administration, in general.

Mixed Land Use: With a view to provide for development, the zoning regulations need to be simplified. The land use package should not be allowed to be changed by any authority, except as a part of the review of the Development Plan at the city / town level.

Financial Planning: Land development and infrastructure investment need to be coordinated through integration of physical, financial and investment planning. There is the need to link spatial development plan with resource mobilization plan focusing on credit enhancement mechanisms.

138


Services and Environment: City plans which provide for up-gradation of the services for greater equity in the availability of water, sewerage and sanitation throughout the city, would have a higher probability of success.

Needs of the informal sector: The plan must provide for and cater to the needs of the informal sector so as to make them as an integral part of the city development process.

Land Policy and Management: As opposed to the process of compulsory land acquisition, and the related issue of low compensation rates, the ULBs should adopt collaborative approaches within the existing legal framework.

Legal Framework: Plan implementation would call for a legal framework so as to make it enforceable and mandatory. The legal framework has to be supported by an effective and efficient machinery which would see that no distortion of master plan proposals take place at the ground level.

Standards: Plot sizes, layout and social overheads need to be designed to reduce costs aligned to the affordability of different income groups and also the sale price for lower income groups can be reduced by differential pricing.

Building Bye-laws: Building bye laws and zoning regulations for the city / town should match the local needs. However, the existing bye-laws need to be simplified and transparent, and there should not be an aliment of discretion. Adequate provision for parking facilities should be made.

Database at Metropolitan, district and state levels: The planning exercise need continuous data collection, analysis interpretation and updating of data. A computer-generated data base and information system in GIS environment should be developed at various levels which would provide support to planners in development planning.

Simplification of measure and Procedures: The preparation of Development plans should be completed within a period of 12 months and should be approved within 3 months after the plan approval and the total period for preparation and approval should not exceed 18 months. The approval authority of Development plans should be the ULB, in consultation with the Director of Town planning departments. The perspective plan could also be approved by the state Government through Directorate of Town Planning.

Strengthening Planning Mechanism and Institution: The Town and Country planning acts need to be modified to enable the formulation of inter-elated plans by specifying the definition, scope and contents of various plans.

The administrative, technical, managerial and financial capacities of the ULBs need to be strengthened.

The ULBs and the town planning departments should work under the same state department for better coordination.

The cost recovery procedures and revenue collection methods of ULBs need to be strengthened

138


URBAN PLANNING

Urban, city, or town planning is the discipline of land use planning which deals with the physical, social, and economic development of metropolitan regions, municipalities and neighborhoods. Other professions deal in more detail with a smaller scale of development, namely architecture, landscape architecture and urban design. Regional planning deals with a still larger environment, at a less detailed level.

Historically, urban development was more often a haphazard, incremental event than a deliberate planned process. In the nineteenth century, urban planning became influenced by the newly formalized disciplines of architecture and civil engineering, which began to codify both rational and stylistic approaches to solving city problems through physical design. However, a number of broad critiques of the rational planning model gained momentum after the 1960s (such as those of Jane Jacobs http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Jane_Jacobs), helping to expand the domain of urban planning to include economic development http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_developmentplanning, community social planning and environmental planning.

HistoryBy 2600 BC some Harappan settlements of the Indus Valley civilization had grown into cities containing thousands of people and whose sudden appearance appears to have been the result of planned, deliberate effort. Some settlements appear to have been deliberately rearranged to conform to a conscious, well-developed plan. The streets of major cities such as Mohenjo-daro and Harappa were also laid out in a perfect grid pattern, comparable to that of present day New York. The houses were protected from noise, odours, and thieves. The urban plan found in these cities included the world's first urban sanitation systems.

The Greek Hippodamus (c. 408 BC) is often considered the father of city planning in the West, for his design of Miletus, though examples of planned cities permeate antiquity.

The ancient Romans used a consolidated scheme for city planning, developed for military defense and civil convenience. Effectively, many European towns still preserve the essence of these schemes, as in Turin. The basic plan is a central plaza with city services, surrounded by a compact grid of streets and wrapped in a wall for defense. To reduce travel times, two diagonal streets cross the square grid corner-to-corner, passing through the central square. A river usually flows through the city, to provide water and transport, and carry away sewage, even in sieges.

Contents1 History 2 Actors in the Planning Process 3 Planning and aesthetics 4 Planning and safety 5 Planning and transport 6 Planning and suburbanization 7 Planning and the environment

138

A computer generated picture of a small area of the ancient city of Mohenjodaro

INCLUDEPICTURE "mhtml:file:///G:\\Region\\Region%202006\\Urban%20planning%20-%20Wikipedia,%20the%20free%20encyclopedia.mht!http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/dc/Mohenjodaro_computergeneratedimage1.jpg/350px-Mohenjodaro_computergeneratedimage1.jpg"


Muslims are thought to have originated the idea of formal zoning (see haram and hima and the more general notion of khalifa, or "stewardship" from which they arise), although modern usage in the West largely dates from the ideas of the Congrès Internationaux d'Architecture Moderne.

During the last two centuries in the Western world (Western Europe, North America, Japan and Australasia) planning and architecture can be said to have gone through various stages of general consensus. Firstly there was the industrialized city of the 19th Century, where control of building was largely held by businesses and the wealthy elite. Around the turn of the 20th Century there began to be a movement for providing people, and factory workers in particular, with healthier environments. The concept of garden cities arose and some model towns were built, such as Welwyn Garden City in England. However, these were principally small scale in size, typically dealing with only a few thousand residents, and it wasn't until the 1920s when modernism began to surface. A modernist city was to be a sort of efficient, workable utopia. There were plans for large scale rebuilding of cities, such as Paris in France, though nothing major happened until the devastation caused by the Second World War. After this, some modernist buildings and communities were built. However they were cheaply constructed and became notorious for their social problems.

Modernism can be said to have ended in the 1970s when the construction of the cheap, uniform tower blocks ended in many countries, such as Britain and France. Since then many have been demolished and in their way more conventional housing has been built. Rather than making everything uniform and perfect, planning now concentrates on individualism and diversity in society and the economy. This is the post-modernist era.

Actors in the Planning ProcessThe traditional planning process focused on top-down processes where the town planner (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Town_planner)created the plans. He or she is usually skilled in surveying, engineering or architecture, bringing to the town planning process ideals based around these disciplines. They typically worked for governments.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Mohenjodaro_computergeneratedimage1.jpg






138


Changes to the planning process over past decades have witnessed the metamorphosis of the role of the urban planner in the planning process. Calls championing for more democratic planning processes have played a huge role in allowing the public to make important decisions as part of the planning process.

Developers too have played huge roles in influencing the way development occurs, particularly through project-based planning. Many recent developments were results of large and small-scale developers who purchased land, designed the district and constructed the development from scratch. The Melbourne Docklands, for example, was largely an initiative pushed by private developers who sought to redevelop the waterfront into a high-end residential and commercial district.

Planning and aestheticsIn developed countries there has been a backlash against excessive man-made clutter in the environment, such as signposts, signs, and hoardings. Other issues that generate strong debate amongst urban designers are tensions between peripheral growth, increased housing density and planned new settlements. There are also unending debates about the benefits of mixing tenures and land uses, versus the benefits of distinguishing geographic zones where different uses predominate.

Successful urban planning considers character, of "home" and "sense of place", local identity, respect for natural, artistic and historic heritage, an understanding of the "urban grain" or "townscape," pedestrians and other modes of traffic, utilities and natural hazards, such as flood zones.

Some argue that the medieval piazza and arcade are the most widely appreciated elements of successful urban design, as demonstrated by the Italian cities of Siena and Bologna.

While it is rare that cities are planned from scratch planners are important in managing the growth of cities, applying tools like zoning to manage the uses of land, and growth management to manage the pace of development. When examined historically, many of the cities now thought to be most beautiful are the result of dense, long lasting systems of prohibitions and guidance about building sizes, uses and features. These allowed substantial freedoms, yet enforce styles, safety, and often materials in practical ways. Many conventional planning techniques are being repackaged as smart growth.

There are some cities that have been planned from conception, and while the results often don't turn out quite as planned, evidence of the initial plan often remains. See List of planned cities (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_planned_cities). Some of the most successful planned cities consist of cells that include park-space, commerce and housing, and then repeat the cell. Usually cells are separated by streets. Often each cell has unique monuments and gardening in the park, and unique gates or boundary-markers for the edges of the cell. The commercial areas naturally become diverse. These differences help instill a sense of place, while the similarities of the cells make each place in the city familiar.

138


Planning and safetyHistorically within the Middle East, Europe and the rest of the Old World settlements were located on higher ground (for defense) and close to fresh water sources. Cities have often grown onto coastal and flood plains at risk of floods and storm surges. Urban planners must consider these threats. If the dangers can be localized then the affected regions can be made into parkland or Greenbelt, often with the added benefit of open space provision.

Extreme weather, flood, or other emergencies can often be greatly mitigated with secure evacuation routes and emergency operations centers. These are relatively inexpensive and unintrusive, and many consider them a reasonable precaution for any urban space. Many cities will also have planned, built safety features, such as levees, retaining walls, and shelters.

In recent years, practitioners have also been expected to maximize the accessibility of an area to people with different abilities, practicing the notion of "inclusive design," to anticipate criminal behavior and consequently to "design-out crime" and to consider "traffic calming" or "pedestrianisation" as ways of making urban life more bearable.

City planning tries to control criminality with structures designed from theories like socio-architecture or environmental determinism. These theories say that an urban environment can influence individuals' obedience to social rules. The theories often say that psychological pressure develops in more densely developed, unadorned areas. This stress causes some crimes and some use of illegal drugs. The antidote is usually more individual space and better, more beautiful design in place of functionalism.

Oscar Newman’s defensible space theory cites the modernist housing projects of the 1960s as an example environmental determinism, where large blocks of flats are surrounded by shared and disassociated public areas, which is harder to identify with for the residents. As those on lower incomes cannot hire others to maintain public space such as security guards or grounds keepers, and because no individual feels personally responsible, there was a general deterioration of public space leading to a sense of alienation and social disorder

Jane Jacobs is another notable environmental determinist and is associated with the "eyes on the street" concept. By improving ‘natural surveillance’ of shared land and facilities of nearby residents by literally increasing the number of people who can see it, and increasing the familiarity of residents, as a collective, residents can more easily detect undesirable or criminal behavior.

The "broken-windows" theory believes that small indicators of neglect, such as broken windows and unkempt lawns, promote a feeling that an area is in a state of decay. Anticipating decay, people likewise fail to maintain their own properties. the theory suggests that abandonment causes crime, rather than crime causing abandonment.

Some planning methods might help an elite group to control ordinary citizens. This was certainly the case of Rome (Italy), where Fascism in the 1930s created ex novo many new suburbs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suburb) in order to concentrate criminals and poorer classes away from the elegant town.

138


Other social theories point out that in Britain and most countries since the 18th century, the transformation of societies from rural agriculture to industry caused a difficult adaptation to urban living. These theories emphasize that many planning policies ignore personal tensions, forcing individuals to live in a condition of perpetual extraneity to their cities. Many people therefore lack the comfort of feeling "at home" when at home. Often these theorists seek a reconsideration of commonly used "standards" that rationalize the outcomes of a free (relatively unregulated) market.Planning and transportThere is a direct, well-researched connection between the density of an urban environment, and the need to travel within it. Good quality transport is often followed by development. Development beyond a certain density can quickly overcrowd transport.

Good planning attempts to place higher densities of jobs or residents near high-volume transportation. For example, some cities permit commerce and multi-story apartment buildings only within one block of train stations and four-lane boulevards, and accept single-family dwellings and parks further away.

Densities are usually measured as the floor area of buildings divided by the land area. Floor area ratios below 1.5 are low density. Plot ratios above five are very high density. Most exurbs are below two, while most city centers are well above five. Walk-up apartments with basement garages can easily achieve a density of three. Skyscrapers easily achieve densities of thirty or more. Higher densities tempt developers with higher profits. City authorities may try to encourage lower densities to reduce infrastructure costs, though some observers note that low densities may not accommodate enough population to provide adequate demand or funding for that infrastructure. In the UK, recent years have seen a concerted effort to increase the density of residential development in order to better achieve sustainable development. Increasing development density has the advantage of making mass transport systems, district heating and other community facilities (schools, health centers etc) more viable. However critics of this approach dub the densification of development as 'town cramming' and claim that it lowers quality of life and restricts market led choice.

Problems can often occur at residential densities between about two and five. These densities can cause traffic jams for automobiles, yet are too low to be commercially served by trains or light rail systems. The conventional solution is to use buses, but these and light rail systems may fail where automobiles and excess road network capacity are both available, achieving less than 1% ridership.

The Lewis-Mogridge Position claims that increasing road space is not an effective way of relieving traffic jams as latent or induced demand invariably emerges to restore a socially-tolerable level of congestion.

Some theoreticians speculate that personal rapid transit (PRT) might coax people from their automobiles, and yet effectively serve intermediate densities, but this has not been demonstrated.

A practical social path to serving intermediate densities might be to enhance car-pool lanes with automated control and electric power to reach the traffic densities and low

138


emissions of PRT. Some areas, such as Korea are developing proposals in which cars are manually driven on conventional streets to computer-controlled limited-access expressways. Some dual-use proposals for personal rapid transit would utilize certified, light-weight vehicles using electricity for the large power use of high-speed travel (e.g. Ford's PRISM proposal).

Planning and suburbanizationIn some countries declining satisfaction with the urban environment is held to blame for continuing migration to smaller towns and rural areas (so-called urban exodus). Successful urban planning supported Regional planning can bring benefits to a much larger hinterland or city region and help to reduce both congestion along transport routes and the wastage of energy implied by excessive commuting.

Planning and the environmentArcheology seeks to unify the fields of ecology and architecture, especially landscape architecture, to achieve a harmonious environment for all living things. On a small scale, the eco-village theory has become popular, as it emphasizes a traditional 100-140 person scale for communities.

In most advanced urban or village planning models, local context is critical. In many, gardening assumes a central role not only in agriculture but in the daily life of citizens. A series of related movements including green anarchism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Green anarchism), eco-anarchism, eco-feminism and Slow Food have put this in a political context as part of a focus on smaller systems of resource extraction, and waste disposal, ideally as part of living machines which do such recycling automatically, just as nature does. The modern theory of natural capital emphasizes this as the primary difference between natural and infrastructural capital, and seeks an economic basis for rationalizing a move back towards smaller village units. A common form of planning that leads to suburban sprawl is single use zoning.

An urban planner is likely to use a number of Quantitative tools to forecast impacts of development on a variety of environmental concerns including roadway air dispersion models to predict air quality impacts of urban highways and roadway noise models to predict noise pollution effects of urban highways.

Documents

Regional Planning