20
OECD’s GfD in Arab countries OECD’s GfD in Arab countries Initiative Initiative Tunis 15-16 February 2007 Tunis 15-16 February 2007 Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece Dr. P.Karkatsoulis Policy Advisor to the Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization, Professor at the National School of Public Administration

Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

  • Upload
    zalika

  • View
    24

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece. Dr. P.Karkatsoulis Policy Advisor to the Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization, Professor at the National School of Public Administration. The background of regulatory reform in Greece. Several fragmented efforts on: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

Dr. P.KarkatsoulisPolicy Advisor to the Ministry of Interior, Public

Administration and Decentralization, Professor at the National School of Public Administration

Page 2: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

2

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

• Several fragmented efforts on:– Simplification– Codification– Transposition– Law drafting

• Intensive discussion inside and outside Greece

• OECD report (2001)• EU policy on Better Regulation

(2002)

The background of regulatory reform in Greece

Page 3: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

3

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

The size of the norm flow

European Union:

EU-Aquis composed by 16.000 Directives covers 96.000 pages.

Greece:

3430 Parliamentary laws in the last 30 years, 5 times more Presidential decrees authorized by the law and 63 times more ministerial decisions.

Page 4: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

4

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007 The main problems of the Greek

regulatory system were identified as:– There are too many and very detailed

regulations in force– Provisions on the same issues are

interspersed to different regulations– The increasing production of

regulations by the administration

Main problems

Page 5: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

5

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Regulatory Inflation

TYPES OF LAWS ENACTED FROM 1975 TO 2005 IN GREECE

11%

28%

14%

47%

GENERAL PARTICULAR AMENDMENTS RATIFICATIONS

Page 6: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

6

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

PARTICIPATION OF MINISTRIES IN THE AVERAGE PRODUCTION OF MINISTERIAL DECISIONS (1987-1998)

Culture13%

Prime Minister1%

IRT3%

Press & Mass Media0%

Transport & Communication

3%

Health & Welfare15%

Development1%

Tourism0%

MIPAD1%

Labour&Social Security

8%Foreign Affairs

1%

MerchantMarine

4%

Commerce2%

Naitonal Education &Religion

10%National Economy

3%

NationalDefence

3%

Environment, Urban Development and Public

Works3%

Finance16%

Agean0%

Justice2%

PublicOrder Τάξης

1%

Agriculture4%

Presidensy of the Government

2%

Interior4%

Macedonia-Thrace

0%

Page 7: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

7

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Dispersed Horizontal Structure• Ministry of Foreign Affairs

– For notification of the transposed aquis

• Ministry of Economics– For the transposition of the aquis

• General Accounting Office– For the impact on state budget

• Ministry of Interior– For simplification and codification issues

• Central Committee for the preparation of legislation– For technical suggestions on bills

• Council of the State– Consulted for Presidential Decrees

• Parliament– Scientific Committees– Committees and Plenary

Page 8: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

8

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Do we know the reasons why does it happen?

Some basic assumptions– The form of the state

– The existing legislative culture

– The welfare state

– Unexpected social events/periods of fast social movements

– International Organizations

– State intervention to economic transactions

Page 9: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

9

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Crucial achievements

• One – stop – shops for citizens and businesses

• Sufficient infrastructure (e – government)

• Pool of experts

Page 10: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

10

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Lack of a regulatory reform strategy

• While the weaknesses of the legislative instrumentarium are well known, the measures taken were mostly conceived as ad hoc reactions.

• The new IAs (energy, telecom, competition) have been used as driving forces for the new era of better regulation.

Page 11: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

11

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

The EU Better Regulation• Mandelkern report

– It describes a comprehensive overall approach to better regulation. – It recommends practices applicable to both national governments and the

European Commission. – It also makes recommendations to the Institutions of the EU

• Commissions Action plan– It launched a series of measures to review the body of existing law.

• The European IA– It aims to improve the quality of the Commission's policy proposals in

terms of their efficiency, effectiveness and coherency. – It identifies alternative policy options and their likely positive and negative

impacts, with a particular focus on economic, environmental and social effects, in line with the EU Sustainable Development Strategy

• The DEBR network– The DEBR performs an advocacy role, promoting best practices and

initiating new thinking. – It promotes the exchange of national practices– The DEBR is capable of adding value to the EU level debate by staging a

dialogue about issues that are not on the official EU agenda yet.

Page 12: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

12

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

The legal framework for regulatory reform

• Following the OECD recommendations (2001) and the EU priorities, Greece established an inter-ministerial Committee to elaborate a new framework for the improvement of regulation .

• The ad hoc inter-ministerial legislative Committee had to overcome a lot of obstacles, misunderstandings and peculiarities.

• The draft remained in “queue” more than two years, until…

Page 13: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

13

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

….The Prime Minister issued a circular “on the national regulatory policy and the quality and effectiveness of regulations”, on July 2006.

The circular was addressed to:– Ministers– Deputy Ministers– The Secretary General of the Government– The Secretaries General of all Ministries– The Secretaries General of the Regions

The legal framework for regulatory reform

Page 14: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

14

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

– Identify the problem to which the proposed regulation is going to give a solution

– Assess the impact of the regulation on • the Economy (i.e. competitiveness, investment, market,

administrative burdens imposed on SMEs etc…)• Society (i.e. labour, gender mainstreaming, health,

persons with disabilities …)• The environment

– Alternative options to regulation should be considered

– Achieve a consensus through broad public participation

The Prime Minister’s circular:The procedures of better law making

Page 15: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

15

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

The Prime Minister’s circular:Structures

MINISTRY I

Regulatory Quality Assessment Unit

Regulatory Quality Assessment Unit

REGION I

. . .

MINISTRY II

Regulatory Quality Assessment Unit

MINISTRY …

Regulatory Quality Assessment Unit

Regulatory Quality Assessment Unit

REGION II

Regulatory Quality Assessment Unit

REGION …

. . .

Supervised by the General Secretariat of the Government

Page 16: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

16

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Proportio-nality

Necessity

Legality

SimplicityAccessibility

Transparency

The Prime Minister’s circular:Principles of better regulation

Page 17: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

17

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

The Prime Minister’s circularTools of better regulation: RIA

According to the Prime Minister’s circular regulations should be checked against:

• Their impact on the economy• Their impact on competitiveness• The simplification of procedures• Quality law drafting rules/Accessibility• Codification• Transposition

Page 18: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

18

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Multi – level government

The criteria of better regulation should be implemented in the case of:– A new regulation– A regulation which is going to be simplified– A regulation which is going to be codified– A regulation which transposes an EU

directive

Page 19: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

19

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

The way forward

• Manual on the use of e – RIA has been elaborated

• Specific Action plans requested from each Ministry

• Ex – post Impact Assessment prepared for the end of 2007

• All the Ministries have to have finished the RIA implementation project by the end of 2007

Page 20: Regulatory Impact Assessment in Greece

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

OE

CD

’s G

fD i

n A

rab

co

un

trie

s In

itia

tive

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Tu

nis

15-

16 F

ebru

ary

2007

Thank you for your attention

Dr. Panagiotis Karkatsoulis

[email protected]