3
Annals of Applied Biology ISSN 0003-4746 EDITORIAL Research on abiotic and biotic stress – what next? R.A. Azevedo 1 & P.J. Lea 2 1 Departamento de Gen ´ etica, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Universidade de S ˜ ao Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil 2 Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4AP, UK Correspondence R.A. Azevedo, Departamento de Gen ´ etica, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Universidade de S ˜ ao Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. Email: [email protected] Received: 18 July 2011; revised version accepted: 2 August 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2011.00500.x Due to the presence of a wide range of different forms of environmental pollution, there is no argument that agricultural productivity is subject to major challenges on a daily basis (Brown & Funk, 2008; Turner et al., 2009; Davies et al., 2011; Hatfield et al., 2011). Not only is the key goal of increasing food production under threat (Parry & Lea, 2009), but also ecological, social and other aspects that are separate from Science and Technology have to be considered and addressed so that we can respond quickly and efficiently with new ideas. Annals of Applied Biology has received a large number of submitted manuscripts in the last few years, which have described the effects of abiotic and biotic stresses on plant growth and development, although only a small number of more comprehensive papers have been accepted and published (Grat ˜ ao et al., 2008; Jin et al., 2009; Macia- Vicente et al., 2009; Rios et al., 2009; Stein et al., 2009; Teixeira & Carvalho, 2009; Vallino et al., 2009; Bernstein et al., 2010; Cartes et al., 2010; Castillejo et al., 2010; Soccio et al., 2010). It has become obvious to us that the contributions have been limited to certain aspects in the field, the large majority concentrating on standard physiological and biochemical analyses, which does not necessarily mean that there is no room for such type of studies (Azevedo et al., 2011). Arruda & Azevedo (2009) have already proposed that new techniques used for the analysis of metals should not be restricted to chemical research, but that they could also be used to help in increasing our understanding of a wide range of biological and environmental problems caused by heavy metals. A quick search of the literature reveals that the annual number of papers published on stress physiology in plants has increased by almost three-fold over the last 10 years. Such a search also reveals that there has been a lot of repetition, with the majority of papers employing similar experimental procedures and analytical techniques. Studies aimed at obtaining more information on the effects of different environments on genetic variation are needed, if there is to be further progress towards breeding for stress tolerance. The mapping of quantita- tive trait loci (QTL) is of considerable value (Courtois et al., 2009; Reynolds et al., 2009; Jagadish et al., 2010, 2011), if the QTL × environment interaction is to be better understood. For example, two significant and two putative quantitative QTL for root density and 28 QTL for drought avoidance were identified in a mapping pop- ulation of upland rice (Cairns et al., 2009). Norton et al. (2009) provided a nice example of the study of environ- mental and genetic control of arsenic accumulation and speciation in rice grains. The same group also carried out genetic mapping of the rice ionome in both leaves and grain, identifying QTL for 17 elements including arsenic, cadmium, iron and selenium (Norton et al., 2010). Proteomic studies can also provide important infor- mation on stress responses (Afroz et al., 2011; Bandehagh et al., 2011). For instance, Castillejo et al. (2010) described a two-dimensional gel electrophoresis based proteomic study of the Medicago truncatula–Uromyces striatus inter- action, in which the induction of proteins involved in defence mechanisms during the early stages of infection were identified, and can now be further investigated. Similarly, Sengupta et al. (2011) have very recently iden- tified 9 major proteins that were upregulated and 11 that were downregulated during short-term water stress in the roots of Vigna radiata. The involvement of sulphur and in particular glutathione metabolism in the response to Ann Appl Biol 159 (2011) 317 – 319 © 2011 The Authors 317 Annals of Applied Biology © 2011 Association of Applied Biologists

Research on abiotic and biotic stress – what next?

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Research on abiotic and biotic stress – what next?

Annals of Applied Biology ISSN 0003-4746

E D I T O R I A L

Research on abiotic and biotic stress – what next?R.A. Azevedo1 & P.J. Lea2

1 Departamento de Genetica, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil

2 Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4AP, UK

CorrespondenceR.A. Azevedo, Departamento de Genetica,

Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz,

Universidade de Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, SP,

Brazil.

Email: [email protected]

Received: 18 July 2011; revised version

accepted: 2 August 2011.

doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2011.00500.x

Due to the presence of a wide range of different formsof environmental pollution, there is no argument thatagricultural productivity is subject to major challenges ona daily basis (Brown & Funk, 2008; Turner et al., 2009;Davies et al., 2011; Hatfield et al., 2011). Not only is thekey goal of increasing food production under threat (Parry& Lea, 2009), but also ecological, social and other aspectsthat are separate from Science and Technology have to beconsidered and addressed so that we can respond quicklyand efficiently with new ideas.

Annals of Applied Biology has received a large number ofsubmitted manuscripts in the last few years, which havedescribed the effects of abiotic and biotic stresses on plantgrowth and development, although only a small numberof more comprehensive papers have been accepted andpublished (Gratao et al., 2008; Jin et al., 2009; Macia-Vicente et al., 2009; Rios et al., 2009; Stein et al., 2009;Teixeira & Carvalho, 2009; Vallino et al., 2009; Bernsteinet al., 2010; Cartes et al., 2010; Castillejo et al., 2010;Soccio et al., 2010). It has become obvious to us thatthe contributions have been limited to certain aspects inthe field, the large majority concentrating on standardphysiological and biochemical analyses, which does notnecessarily mean that there is no room for such type ofstudies (Azevedo et al., 2011). Arruda & Azevedo (2009)have already proposed that new techniques used for theanalysis of metals should not be restricted to chemicalresearch, but that they could also be used to help inincreasing our understanding of a wide range of biologicaland environmental problems caused by heavy metals.

A quick search of the literature reveals that the annualnumber of papers published on stress physiology in plantshas increased by almost three-fold over the last 10 years.

Such a search also reveals that there has been a lot ofrepetition, with the majority of papers employing similarexperimental procedures and analytical techniques.

Studies aimed at obtaining more information on theeffects of different environments on genetic variationare needed, if there is to be further progress towardsbreeding for stress tolerance. The mapping of quantita-tive trait loci (QTL) is of considerable value (Courtoiset al., 2009; Reynolds et al., 2009; Jagadish et al., 2010,2011), if the QTL × environment interaction is to bebetter understood. For example, two significant and twoputative quantitative QTL for root density and 28 QTLfor drought avoidance were identified in a mapping pop-ulation of upland rice (Cairns et al., 2009). Norton et al.(2009) provided a nice example of the study of environ-mental and genetic control of arsenic accumulation andspeciation in rice grains. The same group also carried outgenetic mapping of the rice ionome in both leaves andgrain, identifying QTL for 17 elements including arsenic,cadmium, iron and selenium (Norton et al., 2010).

Proteomic studies can also provide important infor-mation on stress responses (Afroz et al., 2011; Bandehaghet al., 2011). For instance, Castillejo et al. (2010) describeda two-dimensional gel electrophoresis based proteomicstudy of the Medicago truncatula–Uromyces striatus inter-action, in which the induction of proteins involved indefence mechanisms during the early stages of infectionwere identified, and can now be further investigated.Similarly, Sengupta et al. (2011) have very recently iden-tified 9 major proteins that were upregulated and 11 thatwere downregulated during short-term water stress in theroots of Vigna radiata. The involvement of sulphur andin particular glutathione metabolism in the response to

Ann Appl Biol 159 (2011) 317–319 © 2011 The Authors 317Annals of Applied Biology © 2011 Association of Applied Biologists

Page 2: Research on abiotic and biotic stress – what next?

Abiotic and biotic stresses R.A. Azevedo & P.J. Lea

cadmium has also been confirmed by proteomic studies(Kieffer et al., 2008; Alvarez et al., 2009).

Further comprehensive research on stress signallingis long overdue, and we hope to see more manuscriptsbeing submitted and published in Annals of Applied Biology.The same is also true for papers using bioinformatics(Reumann, 2010) and molecular genetics (Ghelfi et al.,2011). The use of specific transgenic and mutant plants(Liu et al., 2011; Monteiro et al., 2011; Osakabe et al.,2011) will continue to be extremely important in thisfield. However, perhaps the most promising way forfuture research, is to exploit a systems biology approach,by using inter-disciplinary studies to understand thecomplex stress responses of plants (Ahuja et al., 2010;Keurentjes et al., 2011; Pritchard & Birch, 2011).

References

Afroz A., Ali G.M., Mir A., Komatsu S. (2011) Application

of proteomics to investigate stress-induced proteins forimprovement in crop protection. Plant Cell Reports, 30,

745–763.

Ahuja I., de Vos R.C.H., Bones A.M., Hall R.D. (2010) Plant

molecular stress responses face climate change. Trends in

Plant Science, 15, 664–674.Alvarez S., Berla B.M., Sheffield J., Cahoon R.E., Jez J.M.,

Hicks L.M. (2009) Comprehensive analysis of the Brassica

juncea root proteome in response to cadmium exposure by

complementary proteomic approaches. Proteomics, 9,2419–2431.

Arruda M.A.Z., Azevedo R.A. (2009) Metallomics and

chemical speciation: towards a better understanding of

metal-induced stress in plants. Annals of Applied Biology,155, 301–307.

Azevedo R.A., Carvalho R.F., Cia M.C., Gratao P.L. (2011)

Sugarcane under pressure: an overview of biochemical

and physiological studies of abiotic stress. Tropical Plant

Biology, 4, 42–51.

Bandehagh A., Salekdeh G.H., Toorchi M., Mohammadi A.,

Komatsu S. (2011) Comparative proteomic analysis of

canola leaves under salinity stress. Proteomics, 11,1965–1975.

Bernstein N., Kravchik M., Dudai N. (2010)

Salinity-induced changes in essential oil, pigments and

salts accumulation in sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum) inrelation to alterations of morphological development.

Annals of Applied Biology, 156, 167–177.

Brown M.E., Funk C.C. (2008) Climate. Food security

under climate change. Science, 319, 580–581.Cairns J.E., Audebert A., Mullins C.E., Price A.H. (2009)

Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with root

growth in upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) exposed to soil

water-deficit in fields with contrasting soil properties.Field Crops Research, 114, 108–118.

Cartes P., Jara A.A., Pinilla L., Rosas A., Mora M.L. (2010)

Selenium improves the antioxidant ability against

aluminium-induced oxidative stress in ryegrass roots.

Annals of Applied Biology, 156, 297–307.

Castillejo M.A., Susin R., Madrid E., Fernandez-Aparicio M.,

Jorrin J.V., Rubiales D. (2010) Two-dimensional gelelectrophoresis-based proteomic analysis of the Medicago

truncatula–rust (Uromyces striatus) interaction. Annals of

Applied Biology, 157, 243–257.

Courtois B., Ahmadi N., Khowaja F., Price A.H., Rami J.F.,

Frouin J., Hamelin C., Ruiz M. (2009) Rice root genetic

architecture: meta-analysis from a drought QTL database.

Rice, 2, 115–128.Davies W.J., Zhang J., Yang J., Dodd I.C. (2011) Novel crop

science to improve yield and resource use efficiency in

water-limited agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Science,

149, 123–131.

Ghelfi A., Gaziola S.A., Cia M.C., Chabregas S.M., Falco

M.C., Kuser-Falcao P.R., Azevedo R.A. (2011) Cloning,

expression, molecular modeling and docking analysis ofglutathione transferase from Saccharum officinarum. Annals

of Applied Biology, 159, 267–280.

Gratao P.L., Monteiro C.C., Antunes A.M., Peres L.E.P.,

Azevedo R.A. (2008) Acquired tolerance of tomato

(Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Micro-Tom) plants to

cadmium-induced stress. Annals of Applied Biology, 153,

321–333.Hatfield J.L., Boote K.J., Kimball B.A., Ziska L.H.,

Izaurralde R.C., Thomson A.M., Wolfe D. (2011) Climate

impacts on agriculture: implications for crop production.

Agronomy Journal, 103, 351–370.

Jagadish S.V.K., Cairns J., Lafitte R., Wheeler T.R., Price

A.H., Craufurd P.Q. (2010) Genetic analysis of heat

tolerance at anthesis in rice. Crop Science, 50, 1633–1641.Jagadish S.V.K., Cairns J.E., Kumar A., Somayanda I.M.,

Craufurd P.Q. (2011) Does susceptibility to heat stress

confound screening for drought tolerance in rice?

Functional Plant Biology, 38, 261–269.

Jin C.W., Du S.T., Zhang Y.S., Tang C., Lin X.Y. (2009)

Atmospheric nitric oxide stimulates plant growth and

improves the quality of spinach (Spinacia oleracea). Annals

of Applied Biology, 155, 113–120.

Keurentjes J.J.B., Angenent G.C., Dicke M., Dos

Santos V.A.P.M., Molenaar J., van der Putten W.H., de

Ruiter P.C., Struik P.C., Thomma B.P.H.J. (2011)

Redefining plant systems biology: from cell to ecosystem.

Trends in Plant Science, 16, 183–190.

Kieffer P., Dommes J., Hoffmann L., Hausman J.F.,Renaut J. (2008) Quantitative changes in protein

expression of cadmium-exposed poplar plants. Proteomics,

8, 2514–2530.

Liu G.Y., Zhang Y.X., Chai T.Y. (2011) Phytochelatin

synthase of Thlaspi caerulescens enhanced tolerance and

accumulation of heavy metals when expressed in yeastand tobacco. Plant Cell Reports, 30, 1067–1076.

318 Ann Appl Biol 159 (2011) 317–319 © 2011 The AuthorsAnnals of Applied Biology © 2011 Association of Applied Biologists

Page 3: Research on abiotic and biotic stress – what next?

R.A. Azevedo & P.J. Lea Abiotic and biotic stresses

Macia-Vicente J.G., Rosso L.C., Ciancio A., Jansson H.B.,Lopez-Llorca L.V. (2009) Colonisation of barley roots byendophytic Fusarium equiseti and Pochonia chlamydosporia:effects on plant growth and disease. Annals of Applied

Biology, 155, 391–401.Monteiro C.C., Carvalho R.F., Gratao P.L., Carvalho G.,

Tezotto T., Medici L.O., Peres L.E.P., Azevedo R.A. (2011)Biochemical responses of the ethylene-insensitive Never

ripe tomato mutant subjected to cadmium and sodiumstresses. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 71,306–320.

Norton G.J., Duan G.L., Dasgupta T., Islam M.R., Lei M.,Zhu Y.G., Deacon C.M., Moran A.C., Islam S., Zhao F.J.,Stroud J.L., McGrath S.P., Feldmann J., Price A.H.,Meharg A.A. (2009) Environmental and genetic controlof arsenic accumulation and speciation in rice grain:comparing a range of common cultivars grown incontaminated sites across Bangladesh, China, and India.Environmental Science & Technology, 43, 8381–8386.

Norton G.J., Deacon C.M., Xiong L.Z., Huang S.Y., MehargA.A., Price A.H. (2010) Genetic mapping of the riceionome in leaves and grain: identification of QTLs for17 elements including arsenic, cadmium, iron andselenium. Plant and Soil, 329, 139–153.

Osakabe Y., Kajita S., Osakabe K. (2011) Geneticengineering of woody plants: current and future targetsin a stressful environment. Physiologia Plantarum, 142,105–117.

Parry M.A.J., Lea P.J. (2009) Food security and drought.Annals of Applied Biology, 155, 299–300.

Pritchard L., Birch P. (2011) A systems biology perspectiveon plant–microbe interactions: biochemical and structuraltargets of pathogen effectors. Plant Science, 180, 584–603.

Reumann S. (2010) Toward a definition of the completeproteome of plant peroxisomes: where experimental

proteomics must be complemented by bioinformatics.Proteomics, 11, 1764–1779.

Reynolds M., Manes Y., Izanloo A., Langridge P. (2009)Phenotyping approaches for physiological breeding andgene discovery in wheat. Annals of Applied Biology, 155,309–320.

Rios J.J., Blasco B., Cervilla L.M., Rosales M.A.,Sanchez-Rodriguez E., Romero L., Ruiz J.M. (2009)Production and detoxification of H2O2 in lettuce plantsexposed to selenium. Annals of Applied Biology, 154,107–116.

Sengupta D., Kannan M., Reddy A.R. (2011) A rootproteomics-based insight reveals dynamic regulation ofroot proteins under progressive drought stress andrecovery in Vigna radiata (L.). Wilczek. Planta, 233,1111–1127.

Soccio M., Laus M.N., Spera G.P., Trono D., Pompa M.,Flagella Z., Pastore D. (2010) Mitochondrial prolineoxidation is affected by hyperosmotic stress indurum wheat seedlings. Annals of Applied Biology, 157,1–11.

Stein R.J., Duarte G.L., Spohr M.G., Lopes S.I.G., Fett J.P.(2009) Distinct physiological responses of two ricecultivars subjected to iron toxicity under field conditions.Annals of Applied Biology, 154, 269–277.

Teixeira M., Carvalho I.S. (2009) Effects of salt stress onpurslane (Portulaca oleracea) nutrition. Annals of Applied

Biology, 154, 77–86.Turner W.R., Oppenheimer M., Wilcove D.S. (2009) A force

to fight global warming. Nature, 462, 278–279.Vallino M., Greppi D., Novero M., Bonfante P., Lupotto E.

(2009) Rice root colonisation by mycorrhizal andendophytic fungi in aerobic soil. Annals of Applied Biology,154, 195–204.

Ann Appl Biol 159 (2011) 317–319 © 2011 The Authors 319Annals of Applied Biology © 2011 Association of Applied Biologists