16
Results Results

Results. Response 1855 authors 1814 email contacts 250 responded 14 % 228 completed 92 % 41 emails bounced 1564 non-responders 22 incomplete responses

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Results. Response 1855 authors 1814 email contacts 250 responded 14 % 228 completed 92 % 41 emails bounced 1564 non-responders 22 incomplete responses

Results Results

Page 2: Results. Response 1855 authors 1814 email contacts 250 responded 14 % 228 completed 92 % 41 emails bounced 1564 non-responders 22 incomplete responses

ResponseResponse1855 authors

1814 email contacts

250 responded14 %

228 completed

92 %

41 emails bounced

1564 non-responders

22 incomplete responses

excluded

excluded

excluded

Page 3: Results. Response 1855 authors 1814 email contacts 250 responded 14 % 228 completed 92 % 41 emails bounced 1564 non-responders 22 incomplete responses

Descriptives Descriptives

Gender:Gender: 1:9 1:9

Age in groups

No.

Page 4: Results. Response 1855 authors 1814 email contacts 250 responded 14 % 228 completed 92 % 41 emails bounced 1564 non-responders 22 incomplete responses

Yrs in surgical practiceYrs in surgical practiceNo. of responders

54%

15%19%

9%

4%

Page 5: Results. Response 1855 authors 1814 email contacts 250 responded 14 % 228 completed 92 % 41 emails bounced 1564 non-responders 22 incomplete responses

Location of authorsLocation of authors

35%

4% 2% 7%

25% 27%

Page 6: Results. Response 1855 authors 1814 email contacts 250 responded 14 % 228 completed 92 % 41 emails bounced 1564 non-responders 22 incomplete responses

Where last paper Where last paper published:published:

9% 6% 7% 14% 22%

• Other surgical journal: 13%• Other non-surgical journal: 29%

• Yes, journal of first choice: 75%• No, previously submitted to higher IF surgery journal: 14%• No, previously submitted to higher IF non-surgical journal: 5%• No, previously submitted lower IF journal: 3%

Page 7: Results. Response 1855 authors 1814 email contacts 250 responded 14 % 228 completed 92 % 41 emails bounced 1564 non-responders 22 incomplete responses

Main field of surgeryMain field of surgery

%

Page 8: Results. Response 1855 authors 1814 email contacts 250 responded 14 % 228 completed 92 % 41 emails bounced 1564 non-responders 22 incomplete responses

Do you prefer to submit your Do you prefer to submit your research research

to general or specialty to general or specialty journals?journals?

Page 9: Results. Response 1855 authors 1814 email contacts 250 responded 14 % 228 completed 92 % 41 emails bounced 1564 non-responders 22 incomplete responses

The journals you prefer to The journals you prefer to submit to are predominantly submit to are predominantly

read by:read by:

Global, general Global, general 65%65% Primarily North-AmericanPrimarily North-American 29%29%

by North Americans in 61%by North Americans in 61% by Europeans in 16%by Europeans in 16%

Primarily European/regional/national 6%Primarily European/regional/national 6%

Page 10: Results. Response 1855 authors 1814 email contacts 250 responded 14 % 228 completed 92 % 41 emails bounced 1564 non-responders 22 incomplete responses

Factor Median Mean Sum *”Very Important”

(%) **

”Unimportant”

(%) ***Impact factor 5 4.44 1031 61% 1%Overall reputation

5 4.42 1007 62% 2%

Fast-track 4 3.43 783 20% 9%Time to print 3 3.24 738 18% 11%Previously published your topic

3 3.17 722 10% 9%

Specialty-specific

3 3.05 696 10% 12%

Time to e-print 3 3.00 684 14% 18%

Society affiliation

3 2.91 664 14% 16%

Previous published in same journal

3 2.86 653 10% 18%

Subscription numbers

3 2.79 636 10% 24%

Additional costs 3 2.74 625 17% 25%

Open access 3 2.74 624 12% 24%Acceptance/rejection rate

3 2.71 617 9% 21%

Referee incl/excl.

2 2.11 480 3% 39%

Knowing editors/editorial board

2 2.05 467 2% 39%

Page 11: Results. Response 1855 authors 1814 email contacts 250 responded 14 % 228 completed 92 % 41 emails bounced 1564 non-responders 22 incomplete responses

SINGLE MOST SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT IMPORTANT FACTORFACTORFOR SUBMISSIONFOR SUBMISSION

Page 12: Results. Response 1855 authors 1814 email contacts 250 responded 14 % 228 completed 92 % 41 emails bounced 1564 non-responders 22 incomplete responses

The single most The single most important factor:important factor:

Page 13: Results. Response 1855 authors 1814 email contacts 250 responded 14 % 228 completed 92 % 41 emails bounced 1564 non-responders 22 incomplete responses

Age difference for IF Age difference for IF vs Rep.vs Rep.

p=0.033

Page 14: Results. Response 1855 authors 1814 email contacts 250 responded 14 % 228 completed 92 % 41 emails bounced 1564 non-responders 22 incomplete responses

Journal factors in Journal factors in categoriescategories

Page 15: Results. Response 1855 authors 1814 email contacts 250 responded 14 % 228 completed 92 % 41 emails bounced 1564 non-responders 22 incomplete responses
Page 16: Results. Response 1855 authors 1814 email contacts 250 responded 14 % 228 completed 92 % 41 emails bounced 1564 non-responders 22 incomplete responses

ConclusionsConclusions

Factors deemed Factors deemed mostmost important important

The Journal “prestige” based onThe Journal “prestige” based on Overall reputationOverall reputation Impact factorImpact factor

Factors held Factors held leastleast important important

Authors’ own “influence”Authors’ own “influence” Knowing editor(s) or Knowing editor(s) or selecting refereesselecting referees