12
Reversing Viewpoints Videotape and the Attribution Process: Reversing Actors’ and Observers’ Points of View Katie Harnish

Reversing Viewpoints

  • Upload
    nam

  • View
    69

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Reversing Viewpoints. Videotape and the Attribution Process: Reversing Actors’ and Observers’ Points of View Katie Harnish. Outline. Background Methods Results Discussion Questions Reference. Fundamental Attribution Error (FAE). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Reversing Viewpoints

Reversing ViewpointsVideotape and the Attribution Process:

Reversing Actors’ and Observers’ Points of View

Katie Harnish

Page 2: Reversing Viewpoints

Outline• Background• Methods• Results• Discussion• Questions• Reference

Page 3: Reversing Viewpoints

Fundamental Attribution Error (FAE)

• “The tendency to assume other people’s actions are caused by their personal, individual qualities rather than external, situational forces” (Ross, 1977).

Page 4: Reversing Viewpoints

Background• Individuals (Actors) seem to articulate

potential causes and reasoning behind their own behavior through increased emphasis on external cues (Situational Factors).

• Outsiders (Observers) often consider more internal cues dispositional factors versus situational when explaining others’ behavior.

Page 5: Reversing Viewpoints

Contributing Factors• Differences in actors’ and observers’

points of view:• Availability of information about

external surroundings, behavior, and contexts

• Processing of information

Page 6: Reversing Viewpoints

Purpose of Study• Can actor’s and observers’ points of

view be reversed through changing visual orientation?

Page 7: Reversing Viewpoints

Methods• Overview of Experimental Procedure:

• Interpersonal Conversations-”Getting Acquainted”• Videotape Replays

• Actor-Same Orientation• Observer-Same Orientation• Actor-New Orientation• Observer-New Orientation• Control Group (No videotape replay)

• Post Questionnaire

Page 8: Reversing Viewpoints

Methods cont’d.• 120 Participants-30 groups of 4 people • Measures: Personality Characteristics

Situational Characteristics

Page 9: Reversing Viewpoints

Results• Visual orientation is key when actors and/or

observers are interpreting behaviors.• No significant differences between

perceived level of behavior and differences in attributions (situational, dispositional)

• Significant differences in the correlation between role (actor/observer) and videotape orientation.

Page 10: Reversing Viewpoints

Results cont’d.

• Actors attributed relatively more to situational causes than did observers (control and same orientation group)

• Actors attributed relatively more to dispositional than observers (new orientation group).

• For the questionnaire: dominance was difficult to assess for subjects (observers, self)

Page 11: Reversing Viewpoints

Discussion Question• What are some possible implications

from the results of this study?

Page 12: Reversing Viewpoints

Reference• Storms, M. D. (1973). Videotape and the

Attribution process: Reversing actors' and Observers' points of view.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 165-175.