20
SCALING UP TO MOUNTAINOUS CHANGE Explore p. 650 - 662

Scaling up to mountainous change

  • Upload
    marrim

  • View
    46

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Scaling up to mountainous change. Explore p. 650 - 662. Part 1: Paper plates. 4. At a rate of 2 cm/second how long did it take your plate to move across your work table? About 75 seconds, or 1 minute 15 seconds - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Scaling up to mountainous change

SCALING UP TO MOUNTAINOUS

CHANGEExplore p. 650 - 662

Page 2: Scaling up to mountainous change

PART 1: PAPER PLATES 4. At a rate of 2 cm/second how long did it

take your plate to move across your work table?About 75 seconds, or 1 minute 15 seconds

6. Let’s scale up the velocity from 2cm/second to see how far the plate moves in a year.

7. Using the rate above (km/yr) how long would it take your plate to move to different states?

cm/sec cm/min cm/yr m/yr km/yr2 120 63,115,200 631,000 631

Page 3: Scaling up to mountainous change

PART 1: PAPER PLATES 8. Tectonic plates move at a rate of

3cm/year. How long would it take a tectonic plate to move across your work table? If the table is 150cm long, it would take 50 years. 150cm x 1year/3cm = 50 years

S&T #1a: Continents move about 3cm/yr. What step from #6 has units that are easiest to compare with the velocity of continents? Why?

S&T #1b: Is the paper plate’s or continent’s velocity faster? How much faster? The paper plate is about 21,000,000 times faster 63,115, 200 cm/yr / 3 cm/yr = 21,038,400

Page 4: Scaling up to mountainous change

PART 2: UPS AND DOWNS OF MOUNTAINS

Learning Target: I can distinguish between uplift and erosion processes in mountain belts.Skills:

I can analyze coral terraces and graph elevation changes

I can calculate uplift rates from this graph

I can compare uplift, erosion, and erosion half-life

Page 5: Scaling up to mountainous change

PART 2: UPS AND DOWNS OF MOUNTAINS

Read Introduction p. 654 Some vocabulary: Glacial period – periods where the overall global

climate is cold. Glacials are characterized by low sea levels and the widespread extent of ice sheets.

Interglacial period – periods where the overall global climate is warm. Interglacials are characterized by high sea level and a limited extent of ice sheets.

Radiometric dating - is a technique used to date materials such as rocks, usually based on a comparison between the observed abundance of a naturally occurring radioactive isotope and its decay products, using known decay rates.

Page 6: Scaling up to mountainous change

PART 2: UPS AND DOWNS OF MOUNTAINS

kya means thousands of years ago mya means millions of years ago

Page 7: Scaling up to mountainous change

PART 2: UPS AND DOWNS OF MOUNTAINS

Work with your partner to complete P&P #1-10. p.654-662 (2 days to complete)

Make sure you answer all questions in your science notebook.

Graphs should be done on graph paper and taped into your science notebook!

Must get through step 6 today HW: Read “Weather to Erode” p. 659

and take notes! Don’t forget a summary at the end!

Page 8: Scaling up to mountainous change

REMINDER! If you are planning to take the retest for

the dimensional analysis quiz, the review worksheet is due today.

You must schedule a time to take the quiz either before school, after school, or during lunch on Monday.

Page 9: Scaling up to mountainous change

PART 2: UPS AND DOWNS OF MOUNTAINS First, you used the diagrams of the coral

terraces in Papua New Guinea and Barbados to create a data table (elevation vs. age of coral).

You measured the distance (in mm or cm) from sea level to the top of the coral terrace on the sketch.

You used the scale as a conversion factor to calculate the elevation in meters. (New Guinea: 200m/15mm) (Barbados: 50m/11mm)

Page 10: Scaling up to mountainous change

PART 2: UPS AND DOWNS OF MOUNTAINS

Page 11: Scaling up to mountainous change

PART 2: UPS AND DOWNS OF MOUNTAINSThen you graphed elevation vs. age.

What did the slope correspond to?What can you say about the uplift rates of the two locations?

Page 12: Scaling up to mountainous change

PART 2: UPS AND DOWNS OF MOUNTAINS (Step 6) Then you began with an uplift

rate of 2.5 mm per year (m/yr), and converted it first to meters per thousand years (m/kyr), then to kilometers per million years (km/Myr).

What did you find?

Page 13: Scaling up to mountainous change

PART 2: UPS AND DOWNS OF MOUNTAINS (Step 8) You used the uplift rate of 2.5

mm per year (m/yr) to calculate how much uplift would occur in a mountain chain over 1 Million years. (It was helpful to refer back to your table from step 6).

You repeated this to calculate uplift over 10 Myr.

You compared your calculations to the actual elevation of Mt. Everest (8,850m) over 30 Myr.

Why are they different?

Page 14: Scaling up to mountainous change

PART 2: UPS AND DOWNS OF MOUNTAINS (Step 9) You applied the concept of

erosion half-life to see how a mountain chain that is not being uplifted changes over time.

How did the mountain profile change?

Page 15: Scaling up to mountainous change

PART 2: UPS AND DOWNS OF MOUNTAINS – SUMMARY! You should be able to

use a geologic diagram to determine elevation vs. age graph elevation vs. age calculate an uplift rate from your graph Convert uplift rates from mm/yr to m/kyr to km/Myr Calculate how much uplift occurs in a given amount of

time, given an uplift rate Explain why the calculated uplift may be different

than the actual elevation of a mountain Predict the elevation of peaks and valleys given an

erosion half-life (before and after) Compare erosion half-lives and discuss why they are

different for different areas Discuss how erosion and uplift affect mountains

Page 16: Scaling up to mountainous change

CONTINENTS

Page 17: Scaling up to mountainous change

PLATE BOUNDARIES

Page 18: Scaling up to mountainous change

EARTHQUAKES

Page 19: Scaling up to mountainous change

RECENT VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS

Page 20: Scaling up to mountainous change

HOT SPOT VOLCANOES