Upload
reynaldo-hefferman
View
214
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Section 5-4: Indirect Reasoning Objectives: Today you will learn to
use indirect reasoning to prove a statement.
Section 5-4: Negation
Negation – the negation of a statement has the opposite truth value.
Statement: “Benson is the capital of NC.” Negation: “Benson is NOT the capital of NC.”
Statement: “∠ABC is obtuse.” Negation: “∠ABC is not obtuse.”
Section 5-4: Inverse
Inverse – negates both the hypothesis and the conclusion.
Statement: “If a figure is a square, then it is a rectangle.”
Inverse: (negate both): “If a figure is not a square, then it is not a rectangle.”
(Note: Inverses do not always have the same truth value as the original statement.)
Section 5-4: Contrapositive
Contrapositive – switches the hypothesis and conclusion and negates them both.
Statement: “If a figure is a square, then it is a rectangle.”
Contrapositive: (switch and negate both): “If a figure is not a rectangle, then it is not a square.”
(Note: Contrapositives always have the same truth value as the original statement. They are equivalent statements.)
Section 5-4: Indirect Reasoning
Indirect Reasoning: When all possibilities are considered and all
but one are proved false. The remaining possibility must be true.
Section 5-4: Indirect Reasoning
You get home from school and your brother tells you Hannah called.
You know two Hannahs, but your brother doesn’t know which one called.
You remember that one of the Hannahs you know has band practice after school, so it couldn’t have been her.
It must have been the other Hannah.
Section 5-4: Indirect Proofs
Indirect Proof: A proof that uses indirect reasoning. You
know that a statement or its negation is true. Both cannot be true.
Section 5-4: Indirect Proofs
Steps to Writing an Indirect Proof (p. 266)1. Assume the opposite (negation) of what you want
to prove.
2. Show that this assumption leads to a contradiction.
3. Conclude that the assumption must be false and that what you want to prove must be true.
Section 5-4: Indirect Proofs
You get home from school and your brother tells you Hannah called. You know two Hannahs, but your brother doesn’t know which one called.
Assumption: It was Hannah “A”Contradiction: You remember Hannah “A” has band practice after school, so it couldn’t have been her.
Conclusion: It must have been the other Hannah.
First Step: Assume Opposite
Example 1: Prove: “A triangle cannot have two right
angles.”Assume: A triangle does have two right
angles.
Example 2: Prove: m∠A < m∠BAssume: m∠A ≥ m∠B
First Step: Assume Opposite
Example 3: Prove: Quadrilateral QUIZ does not have
four acute angles.Assume: Quadrilateral QUIZ does have four
acute angles.
Example 4:Prove: ΔABC ≅ ΔXYZAssume: ΔABC ≆ ΔXYZ
Second Step: Identify Contradictions
Example 5:
I. ΔABC is an acute triangle.II. ΔABC is a scalene triangle.III. ΔABC is an equilateral triangle.
II and III contradict each other
Second Step: Identify Contradictions
Example 6:
I. P, Q, and R are coplanarII. P, Q, and R are collinearIII. m∠PQR = 60
II and III contradict each other
Second Step: Identify Contradictions
Example 7:
I. ΔABC is scaleneII. m∠A < m∠BIII. m∠A = m∠C
I and III contradict each other
Second Step: Identify Contradictions
Example 8:
I. m∠A - m∠B = 0II. m∠B < m∠AIII. ∠A and ∠B are supplementary
I and II contradict each other
Write an Indirect Proof: Example 9
Prove: ΔABC cannot contain 2 obtuse angles.
1. Assume the opposite of what you want to prove: ΔABC does contain 2 obtuse angles. Let ∠A and ∠B be obtuse.
2. Find contradiction: If ∠A and ∠B are obtuse, m∠A > 90 and m∠B > 90. So, m∠A + m∠B > 180. Since m∠C > 0, then m∠A + m∠B + m∠C > 180. This contradicts the Triangle Angle-Sum Theorem.
3. Conclusion: The assumption in Step 1 must be wrong. So, ΔABC cannot contain 2 obtuse angles