60
SECULARISATION BELIEF AND UNBELIEF Christopher Watkin christopherwatkin.com

Secularisation belief and unbelief

  • Upload
    bly

  • View
    95

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Secularisation belief and unbelief. Christopher Watkin christopherwatkin.com. Plan of the Lecture. Atheism A very brief history of atheism What is atheism? Dogmatic atheism Practical atheism Agnosticism Difficulties for atheism Secularisation The secularisation thesis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Secularisation belief and unbelief

SECULARISATION BELIEF AND UNBELIEF

Christopher Watkin christopherwatkin.com

Page 2: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Plan of the Lecture Atheism

A very brief history of atheism What is atheism?

Dogmatic atheism Practical atheism Agnosticism

Difficulties for atheism Secularisation

The secularisation thesis What caused secularisation?

Critiques of the secularisation thesis

Page 3: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Plan of the Lecture Disenchantment

The difference between secularisation and disenchantment

Max Weber (1864-1920) What is an ‘enchanted’ world? Rationalisation Disenchantment is not opposed to religion

Rembrandt and Procaccini Disenchantment comes with a new ‘polytheism’

Page 4: Secularisation belief and unbelief
Page 5: Secularisation belief and unbelief

A very brief history of atheism

a + theos (Greek): without God

Page 6: Secularisation belief and unbelief

A very brief history of atheism a + theos (Greek): without

God Oedipus: atheos

Page 7: Secularisation belief and unbelief

A very brief history of atheism a + theos (Greek): without

God Oedipus: atheos Early Christians called

atheists

Page 8: Secularisation belief and unbelief

A very brief history of atheism“Hence are we called atheists. And we confess that we are atheists, so far as gods of this sort are concerned, but not with respect to the most true God, the Father of righteousness and temperance and the other virtues, who is free from all impurity. But both Him, and the Son (who came forth from Him and taught us these things, and the host of the other good angels who follow and are made like to Him), and the prophetic Spirit, we worship and adore, knowing them in reason and truth, and declaring without grudging to everyone who wishes to learn, as we have been taught.”

Justin Martyr, Frist Apology, chapter VI. Accessible at http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.viii.ii.vi.html

Page 9: Secularisation belief and unbelief

What is atheism?

Page 10: Secularisation belief and unbelief

What is atheism?

Page 11: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Dogmatic Atheism

Page 12: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Dogmatic atheism

Page 13: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Dogmatic atheismNATURALISM:

“reality is exhausted by nature, containing nothing ‘supernatural’, and that the scientific method should be used to investigate all areas of reality, including the ‘human spirit’”

(Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/naturalism/

)

Page 14: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Practical Atheism and agnosticism

Page 15: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Practical atheism and agnosticism

Page 16: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Difficulties of atheism

Page 17: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Difficulties of atheism

Page 18: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Difficulties of atheism

Page 19: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Difficulties of atheism

Page 20: Secularisation belief and unbelief

sæculum (Latin): ‘age’ or ‘world’. The secular is to do with this age and with this

world.

Secularisation

Page 21: Secularisation belief and unbelief

The Secularisation Thesis

Page 22: Secularisation belief and unbelief

“By secularization […] is meant the process whereby religious thinking, practices and institutions lose social significance”

Bryan Wilson, Religion in Secular Society (London: Watts, 1966) xiv.

The Secularisation Thesis

Page 23: Secularisation belief and unbelief

The Secularisation Thesis

Judith Fox, ‘Secularisation’, in The Routledge Companion to the Stu

dy of Religion (Hoboken: Taylor & Francis, 2009) 311.

Page 24: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Peter Berger, The Sacred Canopy (New York: Anchor, 1990). First published 1967.

The Secularisation Thesis

Page 25: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Berger, The Sacred Canopy

Page 26: Secularisation belief and unbelief

“Religion legitimates social institutions by bestowing upon them an ultimately valid ontological status, that is, by locating them within a sacred and cosmic frame of reference. The historical constructions of human activity are viewed from a vantage point that, in its own self-definition, tran scends both history and man. This can be done in different ways. Probably the most ancient form of this legitimation is the conception of the institutional order as directly reflecting or manifesting the divine structure of the cosmos, that is, the conception of the relationship between society and cosmos as one between microcosm and macrocosm. Everything "here below" has its analogue "up above." By participating in the institutional order men, ipso facto, participate in the divine cosmos. The kinship structure, for example, extends beyond the human realm, with all being (including the being of the gods) conceived of in the structures of kinship as given in the society.”

Berger, The Sacred Canopy 33.

Page 27: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Berger, The Sacred Canopy

Page 28: Secularisation belief and unbelief

“The concentration of religious activities and symbols in one institutional sphere, however, ipso facto defines the rest of society as "the world," as a profane realm at least relatively removed from the jurisdiction of the sacred. The secularizing potential of this conception could be "contained" as long as Christendom, with its sensitive balance of the sacred and the profane, existed as a social reality. With the disintegration of this reality, however, "the world" could all the more rapidly be secularized in that it had already been defined as a realm outside the jurisdiction of the sacred properly speaking.”

Berger, The Sacred Canopy 123.

Page 29: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Berger, The Sacred Canopy

Page 30: Secularisation belief and unbelief

“The reality of the Christian world depends upon the presence of social structures within which this reality is taken for granted and within which successive generations of individuals are socialized in such a way that this world will be real to them. When this plausibility structure loses its intactness or continuity, the Christian world begins to totter and its reality ceases to impose itself as self-evident truth.”

Berger, The Sacred Canopy 46.

Page 31: Secularisation belief and unbelief

What caused the change?

Page 32: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Critiques of the Secularisation Thesis

Page 33: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Exaggerates the religiosity of pre-secular societies

Mixes up secularisation and the decline of Christianity

Underplays the importance of non-Christian and new religions

Can’t deal with anomalies like the U.S.A. Overlooks non-religious religions, like

humanism

Critiques of the Secularisation Thesis

Page 34: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Critiques of the Secularisation Thesis

Judith Fox, ‘Secularisation’, in The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion (Hoboken: Taylor & Francis, 2009) 315-6.

Page 35: Secularisation belief and unbelief

“I think that the notion of secularisation offers a largely fictitious account of the transformations of religion in Western society during the past centuries. In consequence it camouflages the nature of religion in the contemporary world.”

Thomas Luckmann, Life-world and Social Realities (London: Heinemann Educational Books, 1983)

123.

Critiques of the Secularisation Thesis

Page 36: Secularisation belief and unbelief

“an alternative suggestion is increasingly gaining ground: the possibility that secularization is not a universal process, but belongs instead to a relatively short and particular period of European history which still assumed … that whatever characterized Europe's religious life today would characterize everyone else's tomorrow”

Grace Davie, Religion in Modern Europe: A Memory Mutates (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000) 1.

Critiques of the Secularisation Thesis

Page 37: Secularisation belief and unbelief

The difference between secularisation and secularism

Page 38: Secularisation belief and unbelief

The difference between atheism and secularisation

Atheism is a state of not believing in (the existence of) God or gods

Secularisation (at least by Wilson’s definition) is a process of decline in the significance of religious institutions and practices in a society

Page 39: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Disenchantment and rationalisation

The relation between secularisation and disenchantment Disenchantment is one way of describing a

process of secularisation

Page 40: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Max Weber (1864-1920)

Page 41: Secularisation belief and unbelief

What is an ‘enchanted’ world?

Page 42: Secularisation belief and unbelief

What is an ‘enchanted’ world?

And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day.

Genesis 1:31

Page 43: Secularisation belief and unbelief

What is an ‘enchanted’ world?

Aristotle and final causes (purposes and ‘the good’ written into the natural world)

Page 44: Secularisation belief and unbelief

What is an ‘enchanted’ world?

Page 45: Secularisation belief and unbelief

What happened to the ‘enchanted’ world?

I neither admit nor desire any principles in physics other than [those] in geometry or abstract mathematics; because all the phenomena of nature are thus explained, and certain demonstrations concerning them can be given.

René Descartes, Principles of Philosophy, trans. V. R. Miller and R. P. Miller (Dortrecht:

Kluwer, 1983 [1644]) II.64.

Page 46: Secularisation belief and unbelief

What happened to the ‘enchanted’ world?

The fate of our times is characterized by rationalization and intellectualization and, above all, by the disenchantment of the world. Precisely the ultimate and most sublime values have retreated from public life either into the transcendental realm of mystic life or into the brotherliness of direct and personal human relations.

Hans Gerth and C Wright Mills (eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (New York: Oxford

University Press, 1946) 155.

Page 47: Secularisation belief and unbelief

What happened to the ‘enchanted’ world?

there are no mysterious incalculable forces that come into play, but rather that one can, in principle, master all things by calculation. This means that the world is disenchanted. One need no longer have recourse to magical means in order to master or implore the spirits, as did the savage, for whom such mysterious powers existed. Technical means and calculations perform the service. This above all is what intellectualization means.

Hans Gerth and C Wright Mills (eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (New York: Oxford

University Press, 1946) 139.

Page 48: Secularisation belief and unbelief

What happened to the ‘enchanted’ world?

Page 49: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Two important points1) Disenchantment is not always opposed to religion/Christianity

Page 50: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Two important points

Judith Fox, ‘Secularisation’, in The Routledge Companion to the Stu

dy of Religion (Hoboken: Taylor & Francis, 2009) 308.

Page 51: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Two important points1)Disenchantment is not always

opposed to religion/Christianity

Marcel Gauchet (b. 1946)

Page 52: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Two important points1) Disenchantment is not always opposed to religion/ChristianityChristianity proves to have been a religion for departing from religion. For this reason, Christianity remains the most relevant religion in a postreligious society, especially in Catholicism in Europe where, as dis tinct from America, Christianity has taken a stand against the world that issued from it.

Marcel Gauchet, The Disenchantment of the World, trans. Oscar Burge (Princeton: Princeton University

Press, 1999) 4.

Page 53: Secularisation belief and unbelief

LEFT: Rembrandt van Rijn, The Holy Family (1640). Oil on wood. Louvre, Paris.RIGHT: Giulio Cesare Procaccini, Holy Family with John the Baptist and Angel (1620-25). Oil on canvas. The Hermitage Museum, St Petersburg.

Page 54: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Two important points2) Disenchantment comes with a new ‘polytheism’

Page 55: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Two important pointsI do not know how one might wish to decide 'scientifically' the value of French and German culture; for here, too, different gods struggle with one another, now and for all times to come. We live as did the ancients when their world was not yet disenchanted of its gods and demons, only we live in a different sense. As Hellenic person at times sacrificed to Aphrodite and at other times to Apollo, and, above all, as everybody sacrificed to the gods of his city, so do we still nowadays, only the bearing of person has been disenchanted and denuded of its mystical but inwardly genuine plasticity.[...] Today the routines of everyday life challenge religion. Many old gods ascend from their graves; they are disenchanted and hence take the form of impersonal forces.Hans Gerth and C Wright Mills (eds.), From Max Weber: Essays

in Sociology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1946) 148.

Page 56: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Two important points

Page 57: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Humanity in the disenchanted world: rational and arbitrary

No one knows who will live in this cage in the future, or whether at the end of this tremendous development, entirely new prophets will arise, or there will be a great rebirth of old ideas and ideals, or, if neither, mechanized petrification, embellished with a sort of convulsive self-importance. For of the fast stage of this cultural development, it might well be truly said: “Specialists without spirit, sensualists without heart; this nullity imagines that it has attained a level of civilization never before achieved.”

Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, trans. Talcott Parsons (London: Routledge,

2001) 124.

Page 58: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Caspar David Friedrich, Der Mönch am Meer (The Monk by the Sea). 1808–10. Oil on canvas. Alte Nationalgalerie, Berlin, Germany.

Page 59: Secularisation belief and unbelief

Andy Warhol , Gold Marilyn Monroe (1962). Silkscreen ink on synthetic polymer paint on canvas. Museum of Modern Art, New York.

Page 60: Secularisation belief and unbelief