Upload
austin-cooper
View
32
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Seismic Simulation of Bridge Systems Under Multi-directional Motions. Jian Zhang Assistant Professor Yuchuan Tang and Shi-Yu Xu Graduate Student Researcher Department of Civil and Environment Engineering University of California, Los Angeles. UCLA Progress & Scope of Work. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Seismic Simulation of Bridge Systems Under Multi-directional
Motions
Seismic Simulation of Bridge Systems Under Multi-directional
Motions
Jian ZhangAssistant Professor
Yuchuan Tang and Shi-Yu XuGraduate Student Researcher
Department of Civil and Environment EngineeringUniversity of California, Los Angeles
2
UCLA Progress & Scope of WorkUCLA Progress & Scope of Work Selected 4 ground motion suites that
incorporate the site-dependent probabilistic hazard analysis and ground motion disaggregation analysis.
Selected 2 bridge prototypes that are distinctive in terms of structural characteristics and dynamic properties.
Conducted linear and nonlinear time history analysis of prototype bridges subjected to multi-directional ground shakings and evaluate the effect of vertical motions on seismic demand.
Implement nonlinear structural and foundation elements to realistically capture the response under multi-directional ground shakings.
3
Ground Motion SelectionGround Motion Selection Selection Procedure
Select the Los Angeles Bulk Mail Building (LABMB) site used by PEER Building Benchmark project for prototype bridges (NEHRP Class D)
Conduct site-specific Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) using HAZ software to evaluate the probability of exceeding a given intensity measure within a given time periodMultiple Hazard Levels: 2% in 50 Years and 50% in 50 YearsStructural Period of Interest: T=0.5s (Bridge #4) and T=1.5s
(Bridge #8) Conduct dis-aggregation analysis to select ground motion
records that reasonably represent possible future realizations of ground shaking for the appropriate ground intensity measure levelMaginitude (M), Distance (r) and Epsilon (ε)Fault Type, Directivity and Site Condition
4
Uniform Hazard CurvesUniform Hazard Curves
Structure
Period (s)
Spectral Acceleration (g)
2% in 50 yrs
50% in 50 yrs
0 0.58 0.25
0.1 1.14 0.46
0.2 1.48 0.58
0.3 1.47 0.58
0.4 1.35 0.51
0.5 1.24 0.47
0.75 0.99 0.38
1.0 0.82 0.30
1.25 0.69 0.26
1.5 0.61 0.22
2 0.47 0.18
Note: 5% damping
Uniform Hazard at LABMB Site
5
Ground Motion Record Selection CriteriaGround Motion Record Selection Criteria
Magnitude (M) and Site-Source Distance Range (r) Epsilon (ε)
The physical interpretation of ε is the offset between the value of the record’s intensity measure and the expected value from an attenuation relationship.
Parameter ε is model dependent. Attenuation relationship by Abrahamson and Silva (1997) is used to quantify ε.
Positive ε (“peak record”) motions lead to reduced seismic demand as building softens.
Negative ε (“valley record”) motions lead to larger seismic demand as building softens.
Scaling Factor Scaling is needed to enforce a consistent value of target
intensity measure Scaling factor is obtained from the geometric mean of a
single recording and applied equally to all components of the recorded motions
6
Seismic Hazard Disaggregation (T=0.5s)Seismic Hazard Disaggregation (T=0.5s)
0-10
10-2
0
20-3
0
30-4
0
40-5
0
50-6
0
60-7
0
70-8
0
80-9
0
90-1
00
100-
1000
5.0-5.5
5.5-6.06.0-6.5
6.5-7.07.0-7.5
7.5-8.08.0-8.5
0.00E+00
2.00E-02
4.00E-02
6.00E-02
8.00E-02
1.00E-01
1.20E-01
1.40E-01
1.60E-01
1.80E-01
2.00E-01
Rel
ativ
e C
on
trib
uti
on
Distance
Magnitude
Hazard Level: 2% in 50 Years (Targeted PGA=1.24g)
5.0-5.5
6.0-6.5
7.0-7.5
8.0-8.5
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
Distance
Magnitude
For most hazard levels, the intensity measure is dominated by two clusters of magnitude-distance combinations: Cluster A: Small r and small M Cluster B: large r and large M
Hazard Level: 50% in 50 Years (Targeted PGA=0.47g)
7
Seismic Hazard Disaggregation (T=1.5s)Seismic Hazard Disaggregation (T=1.5s)
For most hazard levels, the intensity measure is dominated by two clusters of magnitude-distance combinations: Cluster A: Small r and small M Cluster B: large r and large M
5.0-5.5
6.0-6.5
7.0-7.5
8.0-8.5
0.00E+00
2.00E-02
4.00E-02
6.00E-02
8.00E-02
1.00E-01
1.20E-01
1.40E-01
1.60E-01
1.80E-01
2.00E-01
Distance
Magnitude
5.0-5.5
6.0-6.5
7.0-7.5
8.0-8.5
0.00E+00
2.00E-02
4.00E-02
6.00E-02
8.00E-02
1.00E-01
1.20E-01
1.40E-01
1.60E-01
1.80E-01
2.00E-01
Distance
Magnitude
Hazard Level: 2% in 50 Years (Targeted PGA=0.61g)
Hazard Level: 50% in 50 Years (Targeted PGA=0.22g)
8
Selected Earthquake MotionsSelected Earthquake Motions
Earthquake Station Peak Ground Acceleration (g) Scaling
Factor
Horizontal-X
Horizontal-Y
Vertical
1987 Whittier Narrows
Studio City – Coldwater
0.177 0.231 0.067 2.79
1987 Whittier Narrows
N. Hollywood 0.101 0.250 0.059 3.42
1987 Whittier Narrows
Santa Fe Springs 0.336 0.378 0.206 1.20
1987 Whittier Narrows
Rancho Los Cerritos
0.159 0.189 0.083 2.84
1994 Northridge 90013 Beverly Hills
0.416 0.516 0.326 0.74
1992 Cape Mendocino
Rio Dell Overpass 0.249 0.529 0.131 1.57
1987 Whittier Narrows
Campton - Castlegate
0.297 0.333 0.137 2.10
1986 Chalfant Valley
Zack Brothers Ranch
0.447 0.400 0.321 1.04
1983 Coalinga Pleasant Valley P.P.
0.592 0.551 0.293 0.89
1992 Cape Mendocino
89156 Petrolia 0.586 0.662 0.163 1.06
1994 Northridge Sepulveda VA Hospital
0.532 0.669 0.467 0.79
1986 N. Palm Springs
Whitewater Trout Farm
0.492 0.612 0.471 1.04
Hazard Level: 2% in 50 Years; Dissaggregation Period: 0.5s
9
Selected Earthquake MotionsSelected Earthquake Motions
Earthquake Station Peak Ground Acceleration (g) Scaling
Factor
Horizontal-X
Horizontal-Y
Vertical
1986 N. Palm Springs
Desert Hot Springs
0.331 0.271 - 0.93
1989 Loma Prieta
Hollister Diff. Array
0.211 0.251 0.154 0.72
1979 Imperial Valley
SAHOP Casa Flores
0.287 0.496 0.379 0.68
1971 San Fernando
Lake Hughes #1 0.145 0.11 0.098 1.85
1987 Whittier Narrows
Campton - Castlegate
0.297 0.333 0.137 0.8
1987 Whittier Narrows
Obregon Park 0.322 0.400 0.144 1.02
1986 Chalfant Valley
Zack Brothers Ranch
0.447 0.4 0.321 0.39
1979 Imperial Valley
6621 Chihuahua 0.27 0.254 0.218 0.87
1983 Coalinga Parkfield – Fault Zone
0.282 0.274 0.097 0.83
1992 Cape Mendocino
Rio Dell Overpass 0.244 0.529 0.131 0.59
1994 Northridge LA – Saturn St 0.475 0.413 0.078 0.46
1986 N. Palm Springs
Whitewater Trout Farm
0.492 0.612 0.471 0.39
Hazard Level: 50% in 50 Years; Dissaggregation Period: 0.5s
10
Acceleration Spectra of Motions Selected for T=0.5sAcceleration Spectra of Motions Selected for T=0.5s
Hazard Level: 2% in 50 Yrs
Hazard Level: 50% in 50 YrsA=1.24g
A=0.47g
11
Selected Earthquake MotionsSelected Earthquake Motions
Earthquake Station Peak Ground Acceleration (g) Scaling
Factor
Horizontal-X
Horizontal-Y
Vertical
1984 Morgan Hill
Hollister City Hall 0.071 0.071 0.118 5.39
1987 Whittier Narrows
Fletcher Drive 0.171 0.213 0.103 6.11
1983 Coalinga Parkfield – Fault Zone
0.282 0.274 0.097 1.87
1986 N. Palm Springs
5070 N. Palm Springs
0.594 0.694 0.435 2.64
1979 Imperial Valley
6621 Chihuahua 0.27 0.254 0.218 3.11
1986 Chalfant Valley
Zack Brothers Ranch
0.447 0.4 0.321 2.02
1994 Northridge 90013 Beverly Hills
0.416 0.516 0.326 1.07
1999 ChiChi Taiwan
HWA011 0.102 0.089 0.039 2.71
1999 ChiChi Taiwan
KAU020 0.078 0.055 0.02 3.15
1999 ChiChi Taiwan
HWA013 0.118 0.142 0.064 2.57
1999 Kocaeli Turkey
Ambarli Termil Santrali
0.249 0.184 0.079 2.32
Hazard Level: 2% in 50 Years; Dissaggregation Period: 1.5s
12
Selected Earthquake MotionsSelected Earthquake Motions
Earthquake Station Name Peak Ground Acceleration (g) Scaling
Factor
Horizontal-X
Horizontal-Y
Vertical
1983 Coalinga Parkfield – Vineyard
0.167 0.23 0.082 1.37
1987 Whittier Narrows
Whittier N. Dam 0.229 0.316 0.505 2.68
1994 Northridge Century City CC North
0.256 0.222 0.116 1.00
1971 San Fernando
Lake Hughes #1 0.145 0.11 0.098 1.92
1992 Landers Yermo Fire Station
0.245 0.152 0.136 0.65
1986 Chalfant Valley
Zack Brothers Ranch
0.447 0.4 0.321 0.73
1999 Kocaeli Turkey
Iznik Karayollari Sefligi
0.136 0.098 0.079 0.79
1999 Kocaeli Turkey
Havaalani 0.09 0.083 0.055 1.95
1989 Loma Prieta
APEEL 2E 0.171 0.139 0.095 1.47
1999 Kocaeli Turkey
Bursa Tofas Fabrikasi
0.103 0.108 0.048 1.41
1992 Landers Indio – Coachella Canal
0.104 0.109 0.042 1.68
1999 ChiChi Taiwan
KAU020 0.078 0.055 0.02 1.14
Hazard Level: 50% in 50 Years; Dissaggregation Period: 1.5s
13
Acceleration Spectra of Motions Selected for T=1.5sAcceleration Spectra of Motions Selected for T=1.5s
A=0.61g
A=0.22gHazard Level: 2% in 50 Yrs
Hazard Level: 50% in 50 Yrs
14
Prototype BridgesPrototype Bridges Two box girder concrete bridges (FHWA Bridge #4
and 8) are selected as prototype bridges for analysis
Structural Charateristics
Design Example #4 Design Example #8
Span/Span LengthThree-span continuous, 320 ft long
Five-span continuous, 500 ft long
Pier TypeTwo-column integral bent, monolithic at column top, pinned at base
Two-column integral bent, monolithic at column top and base
Abutment Type SeatStub abutment with diaphragm
Foundation Type Spread Footing Pile foundation
Expansion JointsExpansion bearings & Shear Keys
Expansion Bearings
Force Resisting Mechanism
Longitudinal: intermediate bent columns & free longitudinal movement at abutmentsTransverse: intermediate bent columns & abutments
Longitudinal: intermediate bent columns and abutment backfillTransverse: intermediate bent columns and abutment backfill
15
Bridge #4 – Structural DetailsBridge #4 – Structural Details
16
Bridge #4 – Pier DetailsBridge #4 – Pier Details
Bent #1 Bent #2
Pier height (ft)
20 20
Foundation (ft)
14 x 14 14 x 14
Pier Cross Section
48”
34 #11 bars
Moment-Curvature Curve
17
Bridge #4 – Surface Foundation DetailsBridge #4 – Surface Foundation Details
Half of footing plan dimension : L = B = 7 ft
Spring and dashpot coefficients based on elastic half-space model by Meek & Wolf (1993)
K11= 1.50E9 N/m =1.03E5 kips/ft, C11= 1.56E7 N.s/m K22= 1.50E9 N/m = 1.03E5 kips/ft, C22= 1.56E7 N.s/m K33= 1.38E9 N/m = 9.44E4 kips/ft, C33= 2.46E7 N.s/m K44= 9.66E9 N*m/rad = 7.12E6 kip*ft/rad C44= 1.08E7 N*m*s/rad K55= 9.66E9 N*m/rad = 7.12E6 kip*ft/rad C55= 1.08E7 N*m*s/rad K66= 1.56E10 N*m/rad = 1.15E7 kip*ft/rad C66= 1.45E7 N*m*s/rad
Equivalent Radii : R = (4*L*B/π)^0.5 = 7.9 ft
18
Bridge #4 – Dashpot of Surface FoundationBridge #4 – Dashpot of Surface Foundation
)1(2
)( 0 aczz
21
)1(2
32
3)(
3
0
aczz
)2(8
)( 0 acxx
32
3)( 0
ac x
sec/10*4563.2)(*** 7
0 m
NacACC zzpzz
sec/10*0752.1)(*** 7
0 rad
mNacICC xpx
sec/10*5589.1)(*** 7
0 m
NacACC xxpxx
sec/10*4548.1)(*** 7
0 rad
mNacICC zpz
Cross area : A = 2L*2B = 18.209 m^2
Thickness : D = 3.5ft = 1.067 m
Soil density : ρ = 1.835 Mg/m^3
Shear wave velocity : Cs = 360 m/sec ; Cp=2*Cs
(Soil Type II, SPT N=50)
Poisson’s ratio : ν = 0.35
19
Bridge #4 – Abutment Modeling (Bin4)Bridge #4 – Abutment Modeling (Bin4)
EQ Strain G1(N/m2) η Kh (N/m) Ch(N*s/
m) Kv (N/m) Cv(N*s/
m) SFA-CAS000 1.00E-03 3.97E+07 0.347471 5.67E+08 1.96E+07 1.91E+09 3.92E+07 2.10
A-CAS270 1.38E-03 3.35E+07 0.384445 4.79E+08 1.81E+07 1.62E+09 3.62E+07 3.13
A-CO2092 7.01E-04 4.74E+07 0.302051 6.78E+08 2.62E+07 2.29E+09 5.23E+07 2.79
A-CO2182 8.45E-04 4.32E+07 0.32642 6.18E+08 2.19E+07 2.09E+09 4.38E+07 2.79
A-CWC180 3.37E-04 6.39E+07 0.21669 9.14E+08 4.35E+07 3.09E+09 8.70E+07 3.42
A-CWC270 1.52E-03 3.14E+07 0.396957 4.49E+08 1.82E+07 1.52E+09 3.63E+07 3.42
A-EJS048 7.87E-04 4.48E+07 0.317294 6.40E+08 2.32E+07 2.16E+09 4.65E+07 1.20
A-EJS318 8.76E-04 4.25E+07 0.330623 6.08E+08 2.13E+07 2.05E+09 4.27E+07 1.20
A-LBR000 5.33E-04 5.35E+07 0.268455 7.65E+08 3.52E+07 2.58E+09 7.04E+07 2.84
A-LBR090 9.03E-04 4.19E+07 0.334072 5.99E+08 2.09E+07 2.02E+09 4.18E+07 2.84
A-ZAK270 7.96E-04 4.45E+07 0.319122 6.36E+08 2.30E+07 2.15E+09 4.59E+07 1.04
A-ZAK360 8.87E-04 4.22E+07 0.332241 6.04E+08 2.11E+07 2.04E+09 4.23E+07 1.45
H-PVY045 6.70E-04 4.83E+07 0.297031 6.91E+08 2.73E+07 2.33E+09 5.46E+07 0.89
H-PVY135 7.85E-04 4.48E+07 0.31702 6.41E+08 2.33E+07 2.16E+09 4.66E+07 0.89
MUL009 3.96E-04 6.03E+07 0.23374 8.62E+08 4.41E+07 2.91E+09 8.82E+07 0.74
MUL279 4.96E-04 5.51E+07 0.259936 7.88E+08 3.78E+07 2.66E+09 7.57E+07 0.74
PET000 8.34E-04 4.35E+07 0.324841 6.22E+08 2.21E+07 2.10E+09 4.42E+07 1.06
PET090 8.88E-04 4.21E+07 0.332943 6.02E+08 2.10E+07 2.03E+09 4.21E+07 1.06
RIO270 8.63E-04 4.29E+07 0.328576 6.13E+08 2.16E+07 2.07E+09 4.32E+07 1.57
RIO360 2.91E-04 6.74E+07 0.200787 9.64E+08 3.89E+07 3.25E+09 7.77E+07 0.71
SPV270 6.47E-04 4.91E+07 0.292623 7.02E+08 2.83E+07 2.37E+09 5.66E+07 0.79
SPV360 1.59E-03 3.04E+07 0.402835 4.35E+08 1.82E+07 1.47E+09 3.65E+07 0.79
WWT180 1.40E-03 3.29E+07 0.387839 4.71E+08 1.81E+07 1.59E+09 3.62E+07 1.04
WWT270 1.28E-03 3.46E+07 0.377415 4.95E+08 1.82E+07 1.67E+09 3.63E+07 1.20
Bin-4 AVG= 6.43E+08 2.55E+07 2.17E+09 5.09E+07
Z0= 3.5814 m Bc= 14.3256 m Gmax=1.15E+0
8 N/m2
S= 1/2 H= 9.144 m Vs=2.50E+0
2 m/s
mu= 0.35
rou= 1835 kg/m3
20
Bridge #4 – Natural Frequencies and ModesBridge #4 – Natural Frequencies and Modes
Mode #1, T=0.81s
Mode #2, T=0.51s
Mode #3, T=0.40s
Mode #4, T=0.32s
Mode #5, T=0.22s
Mode #6, T=0.21s
21
Bridge #4 – Max. response vs. PGABridge #4 – Max. response vs. PGA
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
PG A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
max
Acc
eler
atio
n @
CIP
, g
Long i.(A 1 - x)
Verti. (A 2 - y)
T rans.(A3 - z)
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
PG A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
max
Re
l. D
ispl
acem
ent
@co
l_to
p, m
Long i.(U 1 - x)
Verti. (U 2 - y)
T rans.(U 3 - z)
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
B rid g e 4 w ith lin ea r M -P h i re la tio n sh ip (w ith V -E Q + H -E Q )
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
PG A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0E+000
2E+006
4E+006
6E+006
8E+006
1E+007
max
Sec
tion
For
ce @
col,
N
n2 (S F2 - x)
Verti. (SF1 - y)
n1 (S F3 - z)
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
PG A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0E+000
5E+006
1E+007
2E+007
2E+007
3E+007
max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent @
col,
N*m
@ n1 (SM 1 - x)
@ n2 (SM 2 - z)
@ vert.(SM 3 - y)
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
B rid g e 4 w ith lin ea r M -P h i re la tio n sh ip (w ith V -E Q + H -E Q )
n1
n2x
z
(Linear, 3EQ case)
PGA along x, y, and z directions
PGA along x, y, and z directions
PGA along x, y, and z directions
PGA along x, y, and z directions
Max
Acc
eler
atio
n (
g)M
ax R
elat
ive
Dis
pla
cem
ent
(m)
Max
Sec
tion
For
ce (
N)
Max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent
(N-m
)
22
Bridge #4 – Response Ratio vs. PGA RatioBridge #4 – Response Ratio vs. PGA Ratio
Linear(3EQ/2EQ)
Linear(3EQ/2EQ)
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
V ertica l to H orizonta l P G A ra tio(P G A -y/x ; P G A -y/z)
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
ma
x S
ectio
n F
orc
e R
atio
@co
lw
ith V
-EQ
/ w
itho
ut V
-EQ
n2 (S F2 - y /x)
Verti.(S F1 - y /x)
Verti.(S F1 - y /z)
n1 (S F3 - y /z)
F it 1 : Pow er
F it 1 : Pow er
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
V ertica l to H orizonta l P G A ra tio(P G A -y/x ; P G A -y/z)
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
ma
x S
ect
ion
Mo
me
nt @
col_
bas
ew
ith V
-EQ
/ w
itho
ut V
-EQ
@ n1 (SM 1 - y/x)
@ vert.(SM 3 - y/x)
@ vert.(SM 3 - y/z)
@ n2 (SM 2 - y/z)
B rid g e 4 w ith lin ea r M -P h i re la tio n sh ip (w ith V -E Q / w ith o u t V -E Q )
0 0.4 0 .8 1 .2 1 .6
V ertica l to H orizonta l P G A ra tio(P G A -y/x ; P G A -y/z)
0
20
40
60
ma
x A
cce
lera
tion
ratio
@C
IPw
ith V
-EQ
/ w
itho
ut V
-EQ
Long i.(A 1 - y/x)
V erti. (A 2 - y /x)
V erti. (A 2 - y /z)
T rans.(A 3 - y /z)
F it 1 : P ow er
F it 1 : P ow er
0 0.4 0 .8 1 .2 1 .6
V ertica l to H orizonta l P G A ra tio(P G A -y/x ; P G A -y/z)
0
0 .4
0 .8
1 .2
1 .6
max
Re
l. D
isp
lace
men
t R
atio
@co
l_to
pw
ith V
-EQ
/ w
itho
ut V
-EQ
Long i.(U 1 - y/x)
V erti. (U 2 - y/x)
V erti. (U 2 - y/z)
T rans.(U 3 - y/z)
F it 1 : P ow er
F it 1 : P ow er
Location o f m ax A 2 response changes !
B rid g e 4 w ith lin ea r M -P h i re la tio n sh ip (w ith V -E Q / w ith o u t V -E Q )
Vertical to Horizontal PGA Ratios
Vertical to Horizontal PGA Ratios
Vertical to Horizontal PGA Ratios
Vertical to Horizontal PGA Ratios
Max
Acc
eler
atio
n R
atio
Max
Dis
pla
cem
ent
Rat
io
Max
Sec
tion
For
ce R
atio
Max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent
Rat
io
23
0 0.4 0 .8 1 .2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0E +000
2E +006
4E +006
6E +006
8E +006
1E +007
max
Sec
tion
For
ce @
col,
N
n2 (S F2 - x)
V erti. (S F1 - y)
n1 (S F3 - z)
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
0 0.4 0 .8 1 .2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0E +000
2E +006
4E +006
6E +006
8E +006
1E +007
max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent @
col,
N
@ n1 (S M 1 - x)
@ n2 (S M 2 - z)
@ vert.(S M 3 - y)
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
B rid g e 4 w ith n o n -lin ea r M -P h i re la tio n sh ip (w ith V -E Q + H -E Q )
n1
n2x
z
PGA along x, y, and z directions
Bridge #4 – Max. response vs. PGABridge #4 – Max. response vs. PGA(non-Linear, 3EQ case)
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1 .6
2
max
Acc
eler
atio
n @
CIP
, g
Long i.(A 1 - x)
V erti. (A 2 - y)
T rans.(A 3 - z)
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
0 0.4 0.8 1 .2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.04
0.08
0.12
0.16
max
Rel
. Dis
plac
emen
t @co
l_to
p, m
Long i.(U 1 - x)
V erti. (U 2 - y)
T rans.(U 3 - z)
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
B rid ge 4 w ith n on -lin ear M -P h i re la tion sh ip (w ith V -E Q + H -E Q )M
ax A
ccel
erat
ion
(g)
Max
Rel
ativ
e D
isp
lace
men
t (m
)
Max
Sec
tion
For
ce (
N)
Max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent
(N-m
)
PGA along x, y, and z directions
PGA along x, y, and z directions
PGA along x, y, and z directions
24
Bridge #4 – Response Ratio vs. PGA RatioBridge #4 – Response Ratio vs. PGA Ratio
Non-Linear(3EQ/2EQ)
Non-Linear(3EQ/2EQ)
0 0.4 0 .8 1 .2 1 .6
V ertica l to H orizonta l P G A ra tio(P G A -y/x ; P G A -y/z)
0
0 .25
0.5
0 .75
1
1.25
1.5
max
Sec
tion
For
ce R
atio
@co
lw
ith V
-EQ
/ w
ithou
t V-E
Q
n2 (S F2 - y /x)
V erti.(S F1 - y /x)
V erti.(S F1 - y /z)
n1 (S F3 - y /z)
F it 1 : P ow er
F it 1 : P ow er
0 0.4 0 .8 1 .2 1 .6
V ertica l to H orizonta l P G A ra tio(P G A -y/x ; P G A -y/z)
0
0 .25
0.5
0 .75
1
1.25
max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent @
col
with
V-E
Q /
with
out V
-EQ
@ n1 (S M 1 - y /x)
@ vert.(S M 3 - y/x)
@ vert.(S M 3 - y/z)
@ n2 (S M 2 - y/z)
B rid g e 4 w ith n o n -lin ea r M -P h i re la tio n sh ip (w ith V -E Q / w ith o u t V -E Q )
0 0.4 0 .8 1 .2 1 .6
V ertica l to H orizonta l P G A ra tio(P G A -y/x ; P G A -y/z)
0
10
20
30
ma
x A
cce
lera
tion
ratio
@C
IPw
ith V
-EQ
/ w
itho
ut V
-EQ
Long i.(A 1 - y/x)
V erti. (A 2 - y/x)
V erti. (A 2 - y/z)
T rans.(A 3 - y/z)
F it 1 : P ow er
F it 1 : P ow er
0 0.4 0 .8 1 .2 1 .6
V ertica l to H orizonta l P G A ra tio(P G A -y/x ; P G A -y/z)
0
0 .4
0 .8
1 .2
1 .6
max
Re
l. D
isp
lace
men
t R
atio
@co
l_to
pw
ith V
-EQ
/ w
itho
ut V
-EQ
Long i.(U 1 - y/x)
V erti. (U 2 - y/x)
V erti. (U 2 - y/z)
T rans.(U 3 - y/z)
F it 1 : P ow er
F it 1 : P ow er
Location o f m ax A 2 response changes !
B rid g e 4 w ith n o n -lin ea r M -P h i re la tio n sh ip (w ith V -E Q / w ith o u t V -E Q )
Vertical to Horizontal PGA Ratios Vertical to Horizontal PGA Ratios
Vertical to Horizontal PGA Ratios Vertical to Horizontal PGA Ratios
Max
Acc
eler
atio
n R
atio
Max
Dis
pla
cem
ent
Rat
io
Max
Sec
tion
For
ce R
atio
Max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent
Rat
io
25
Bridge #4 – Response Ratio vs. PGABridge #4 – Response Ratio vs. PGANon-
LinearLinear
Non-LinearLinear
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
max
Sec
tion
For
ce R
atio
@co
lno
n-lin
ear
/ lin
ear
n2 (S F2 - x )
V erti. (S F1 - y)
n1 (S F3 - z )
0 0.4 0 .8 1 .2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent R
atio
@co
lno
n-lin
ear
/ lin
ear
@ n1 (S M 1 - x)
@ n2 (S M 2 - z)
@ vert.(S M 3 - y)
B rid ge 4 : n on -lin ear / lin ear resp on se ( w ith V -E Q )
n1
n2x
z
0 0.4 0 .8 1 .2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.4
0 .8
1 .2
max
Acc
eler
atio
n R
atio
@C
IPno
n-lin
ear
/ lin
ear
Long i.(A 1 - x)
V erti. (A 2 - y)
T rans.(A 3 - z)
0 0.4 0 .8 1 .2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.4
0 .8
1 .2
max
Rel
. Dis
plac
emen
t Rat
io @
col_
top
non-
linea
r / l
inea
r
Long i.(U 1 - x)
V erti. (U 2 - y)
T rans.(U 3 - z)
B rid g e 4 : n on -lin ear / lin ear resp on se ( w ith V -E Q )M
ax A
ccel
erat
ion
Rat
ioM
ax D
isp
lace
men
t R
atio
Max
Sec
tion
For
ce R
atio
Max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent
Rat
io
PGA along x, y, and z directions
PGA along x, y, and z directions PGA along x, y, and z directions
PGA along x, y, and z directions
26
Bridge #4 – Section Moment-Curvature CurveBridge #4 – Section Moment-Curvature Curve
0 0.05 0.1 0.15C urvature (rad/m )
-8000000
-4000000
0
4000000
8000000
Mom
ent
(N
-m)
M -ph i : A baqus
M -ph i : R esponse2000
M -ph i : H and & FEM A
27
Bridge #4 – Column Pushover CurveBridge #4 – Column Pushover Curve
28
0 0.4 0 .8 1 .2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
max
Acc
eler
atio
n R
atio
@C
IPw
ith H
inge
/ w
ithou
t Hin
ge
Long i.(A 1 - x)
V erti. (A 2 - y)
T rans.(A 3 - z)
0 0.4 0 .8 1 .2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
2
4
6
max
Rel
. Dis
plac
emen
t Rat
io @
col_
top
with
Hin
ge /
with
out H
inge
Long i.(U 1 - x)
V erti. (U 2 - y)
T rans.(U 3 - z)
B rid g e 4 : w ith lin ea r M - re la tion sh ip ( w ith H in ge /w ith ou t H in ge )
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1 .6
2
max
Sec
tion
For
ce R
atio
@co
lw
ith H
inge
/ w
ithou
t Hin
ge
n2 (S F2 - x )
V erti. (S F1 - y)
n1 (S F3 - z )
0 0.4 0 .8 1 .2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1 .6
max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent R
atio
@co
lw
ith H
inge
/ w
ithou
t Hin
ge
@ n1 (S M 1 - x)
@ n2 (S M 2 - z)
@ vert.(S M 3 - y)
B rid g e 4 : w ith lin ear M - re la tion sh ip ( w ith H in ge /w ith ou t H in ge )
n1
n2x
z
Bridge #4 – Response Ratio vs. PGABridge #4 – Response Ratio vs. PGAWith
HingeW/O
Hinge
With HingeW/O
Hinge
(Linear)
(Linear)
PGA along x, y, and z directions PGA along x, y, and z directions
PGA along x, y, and z directions PGA along x, y, and z directions
Max
Acc
eler
atio
n R
atio
Max
Dis
pla
cem
ent
Rat
io
Max
Sec
tion
For
ce R
atio
Max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent
Rat
io
29
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2
max
Acc
eler
atio
n R
atio
@C
IPw
ith H
inge
/ w
ithou
t Hin
ge
Long i.(A1 - x)
Verti. (A2 - y)
T rans.(A3 - z)
0 0.4 0.8 1.2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
1
2
3
4
5
max
Rel
. Dis
plac
emen
t Rat
io @
col_
top
with
Hin
ge /
with
out H
inge
Long i.(U 1 - x)
Verti. (U 2 - y)
T rans.(U 3 - z)
B rid ge 4 : w ith n on -lin ear M - re la tion sh ip (w ith H in g e / w ith o u t H in g e)
0 0.4 0 .8 1 .2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.4
0 .8
1 .2
1 .6
max
Sec
tion
For
ce R
atio
@co
lw
ith H
inge
/ w
ithou
t Hin
ge
n2 (S F2 - x )
V erti. (S F1 - y)
n1 (S F3 - z )
0 0.4 0 .8 1 .2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.4
0 .8
1 .2
max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent R
atio
@co
lw
ith H
inge
/ w
ithou
t Hin
ge
@ n1 (S M 1 - x)
@ n2 (S M 2 - z)
@ vert.(S M 3 - y)
B rid g e 4 : w ith n o n -lin ea r M - re la tio n sh ip (w ith H in g e / w ith o u t H in g e)
n1
n2x
z
Bridge #4 – Response Ratio vs. PGABridge #4 – Response Ratio vs. PGAWith
HingeW/O
Hinge
With HingeW/O
Hinge
(non-Linear)(non-
Linear)
PGA along x, y, and z directions PGA along x, y, and z directions
PGA along x, y, and z directions PGA along x, y, and z directions
Max
Acc
eler
atio
n R
atio
Max
Dis
pla
cem
ent
Rat
io
Max
Sec
tion
For
ce R
atio
Max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent
Rat
io
30
Bridge #8 – Structural DetailsBridge #8 – Structural Details
31
Bridge #8 – Pier DetailsBridge #8 – Pier Details
48”
20 #10 bars
Bent #1 Bent #2 Bent #3 Bent #4
Pier height(ft)
30 45 50 45
Pile length(ft)
170 155 150 155
Pier Cross Section
32
Bridge #8 - Pile Foundation DetailsBridge #8 - Pile Foundation Details
Spacing between piles: Sx = Sy = 8 ft
Spring and dashpot coefficients based on model by Makris and Gazetas (1993)
Kx= 1.1497e+009 N/m =7.8869E4 kips/ft, Cx= 3.5792e+007 N.s/m = 2.4553E3 kips.s/ft,
Ky= 3.1174e+009 N/m = 2.1385E5 kips/ft, Cy= 1.0927e+008 N.s/m = 7.4959E3 kips.s/ft,
Kz= 1.1510e+009 N/m = 7.8959E4 kips/ft, Cz= 3.0441e+007 N.s/m = 2.0883E3 kips.s/ft.
CIP concrete pile with steel casingPile diameter: d=2 ft; Pile cross section area(including
transformed area of steel casin): A=673 in2
x
z
46’-0”
22’-
0”
33
Bridge #8 – Natural Frequencies and ModesBridge #8 – Natural Frequencies and Modes
Mode #1, T=1.62s
Mode #2, T=1.38s
Mode #3, T=1.05s
Mode #4, T=0.68s
Mode #5, T=0.45s
Mode #6, T=0.29s
34
-2.5E+03
-2.0E+03
-1.5E+03
-1.0E+03
-5.0E+02
0.0E+00
5.0E+02
1.0E+03
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
time(s)
axia
l fo
rce(
kip
)
-1.5E+02
-1.0E+02
-5.0E+01
0.0E+00
5.0E+01
1.0E+02
1.5E+02
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
time(s)
shea
r fo
rce_
x(ki
p)
-8.0E+02
-6.0E+02
-4.0E+02
-2.0E+02
0.0E+00
2.0E+02
4.0E+02
6.0E+02
8.0E+02
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
time(s)
shea
r fo
rce_
z(ki
p)
At bottom node of Column in Bent#3
At top node of Column in Bent#1
At bottom node of Column in Bent#1
Structural Response of Bridge #8Structural Response of Bridge #8
-1.5E-02
-1.0E-02
-5.0E-03
0.0E+00
5.0E-03
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
time(s)
axia
l re
lati
ve d
isp
.(ft
)
-1.0E-01
-5.0E-02
0.0E+00
5.0E-02
1.0E-01
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
time(s)
rela
tive
dis
p._
x(ft
)
-6.0E-01
-4.0E-01
-2.0E-01
0.0E+00
2.0E-01
4.0E-01
6.0E-01
8.0E-01
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
time(s)
rela
tive
dis
p._
z(ft
)
Column in Bent#3
Column in Bent#1
Column in Bent#1
Force Demand Displacement Demand
1986 N. Palm Springs Earthquake
Tension
35
Bridge #8 – Max. response vs. PGABridge #8 – Max. response vs. PGA(Linear, 3EQ case)
0 0.4 0 .8 1.2 1.6 2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0E +000
2E +006
4E +006
6E +006
8E +006
1E +007
max
Sec
tion
For
ce @
col,
N
n2 (S F2 - x )
V erti. (S F1 - y)
n1 (S F3 - z )
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : ln (Y )=B *ln (X )+A
F it 1 : L inear
0 0.4 0 .8 1.2 1.6 2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0E +000
1E +007
2E +007
3E +007
max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent @
col,
N*m
@ n1 (S M 1 - x)
@ n2 (S M 2 - z)
@ vert.(S M 3 - y)
F it 1 : Y =B *ln (X )+A
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
B rid ge 8 w ith lin ear M -P h i re la tio n sh ip (w ith V -E Q + H -E Q )
x
z n1
n2
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
1
2
3
ma
x A
ccel
era
tion
@C
IP, g
Long i.(A1 - x)
Verti. (A2 - y)
T rans.(A3 - z)
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
max
Re
l. D
ispl
ace
men
t @
col_
top,
m
Long i.(U 1 - x)
Verti. (U 2 - y)
T rans.(U 3 - z)
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : Y=B*ln(X )+A
B rid g e 8 w ith lin ea r M -P h i re la tio n sh ip (w ith V -E Q + H -E Q )
Pga-x,y,zPGA along x, y, and z directions PGA along x, y, and z directions
PGA along x, y, and z directions PGA along x, y, and z directions
Max
Acc
eler
atio
n (
g)M
ax R
elat
ive
Dis
pla
cem
ent
(m)
Max
Sec
tion
For
ce (
N)
Max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent
(N-m
)
36
Bridge #8 – Response Ratio vs. PGA RatioBridge #8 – Response Ratio vs. PGA Ratio
Linear(3EQ/2EQ)
Linear(3EQ/2EQ)
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
V ertica l to H orizonta l P G A ra tio(P G A -y/x ; P G A -y/z)
0
2
4
6
8
ma
x S
ectio
n F
orc
e R
atio
@co
lw
ith V
-EQ
/ w
itho
ut V
-EQ
n2 (S F2 - y /x)
Verti.(S F1 - y /x)
Verti.(S F1 - y /z)
n1 (S F3 - y /z)
F it 1 : Pow er
F it 1 : Pow er
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
V ertica l to H orizonta l P G A ra tio(P G A -y/x ; P G A -y/z)
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
ma
x S
ect
ion
Mo
me
nt @
col_
bas
ew
ith V
-EQ
/ w
itho
ut V
-EQ
@ n1 (SM 1 - y/x)
@ vert.(SM 3 - y/x)
@ vert.(SM 3 - y/z)
@ n2 (SM 2 - y/z)
B rid g e 8 w ith lin ea r M -P h i re la tio n sh ip (w ith V -E Q / w ith o u t V -E Q )
x
z n1
n2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
V ertica l to H orizonta l P G A ra tio(P G A -y/x ; P G A -y/z)
0
20
40
60
80
100
ma
x A
cce
lera
tion
ratio
@C
IPw
ith V
-EQ
/ w
itho
ut V
-EQ
Long i.(A 1 - y/x)
V erti. (A 2 - y /x)
V erti. (A 2 - y /z)
T rans.(A 3 - y /z)
F it 1 : P ow er
F it 1 : P ow er
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
V ertica l to H orizonta l P G A ra tio(P G A -y/x ; P G A -y/z)
0
2
4
6
8
max
Re
l. D
isp
lace
men
t R
atio
@co
l_to
pw
ith V
-EQ
/ w
itho
ut V
-EQ
Long i.(U 1 - y/x)
V erti. (U 2 - y/x)
V erti. (U 2 - y/z)
T rans.(U 3 - y/z)
F it 1 : P ow er
F it 1 : P ow er
Location o f m ax A 2 response changes !
B rid g e 8 w ith lin ea r M -P h i re la tio n sh ip (w ith V -E Q / w ith o u t V -E Q )
Vertical to Horizontal PGA Ratios Vertical to Horizontal PGA Ratios
Vertical to Horizontal PGA Ratios Vertical to Horizontal PGA Ratios
Max
Acc
eler
atio
n R
atio
Max
Dis
pla
cem
ent
Rat
io
Max
Sec
tion
For
ce R
atio
Max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent
Rat
io
37
0 0.4 0 .8 1.2 1.6 2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
1
2
3
max
Acc
eler
atio
n @
CIP
, g
Long i.(A 1 - x)
V erti. (A 2 - y)
T rans.(A 3 - z)
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : Y =B *ln (X )+A
0 0.4 0 .8 1.2 1.6 2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.1
0 .2
0 .3
0 .4
max
Rel
. Dis
plac
emen
t @co
l_to
p, m
Long i.(U 1 - x)
V erti. (U 2 - y)
T rans.(U 3 - z)
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : L inear
F it 1 : Y =B *ln (X )+A
B rid ge 8 w ith n on -lin ear M -P h i re la tion sh ip (w ith V -E Q + H -E Q )
0 0.4 0 .8 1.2 1.6 2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0E +000
2E +006
4E +006
6E +006
8E +006
1E +007
max
Sec
tion
For
ce @
col,
N
n2 (S F2 - x)
V erti. (S F1 - y)
n1 (S F3 - z)
F it 1 : ln (Y )=B *ln (X )+A
F it 1 : ln (Y )=B *ln (X )+A
F it 1 : ln (Y )=B *ln (X )+A
0 0.4 0 .8 1.2 1.6 2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0E +000
4E +006
8E +006
1E +007
2E +007
max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent @
col,
N
@ n1 (S M 1 - x)
@ n2 (S M 2 - z)
@ vert.(S M 3 - y)
F it 1 : ln (Y )=B *ln (X )+A
F it 1 : ln (Y )=B *ln (X )+A
F it 1 : ln (Y )=B *ln (X )+A
B rid g e 8 w ith n o n -lin ea r M -P h i re la tio n sh ip (w ith V -E Q + H -E Q )
x
z n1
n2
Bridge #8 – Max. response vs. PGABridge #8 – Max. response vs. PGANon-
Linear(3EQ case)
Non-Linear(3EQ case)
PGA along x, y, and z directions PGA along x, y, and z directions
PGA along x, y, and z directions PGA along x, y, and z directions
Max
Acc
eler
atio
n (
g)M
ax R
elat
ive
Dis
pla
cem
ent
(m)
Max
Sec
tion
For
ce (
N)
Max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent
(N-m
)
38
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
V ertica l to H orizonta l P G A ra tio(P G A -y/x ; P G A -y/z)
0
20
40
60
80
100
ma
x A
cce
lera
tion
ratio
@C
IPw
ith V
-EQ
/ w
itho
ut V
-EQ
Long i.(A 1 - y/x)
V erti. (A 2 - y/x)
V erti. (A 2 - y/z)
T rans.(A 3 - y/z)
0 0 .5 1 1.5 2 2.5
V ertica l to H orizonta l P G A ra tio(P G A -y/x ; P G A -y/z)
0
1
2
3
4
5
max
Re
l. D
isp
lace
men
t R
atio
@co
l_to
pw
ith V
-EQ
/ w
itho
ut V
-EQ
Long i.(U 1 - y/x)
V erti. (U 2 - y/x)
V erti. (U 2 - y/z)
T rans.(U 3 - y/z)
Location o f m ax A 2 response changes !
B rid g e 8 w ith n o n -lin ea r M -P h i re la tio n sh ip (w ith V -E Q / w ith o u t V -E Q )
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
V ertica l to H orizonta l P G A ra tio(P G A -y/x ; P G A -y/z)
0
1
2
3
4
5
max
Sec
tion
For
ce R
atio
@co
lw
ith V
-EQ
/ w
ithou
t V-E
Q
n2 (S F2 - y /x)
V erti.(S F1 - y /x)
V erti.(S F1 - y /z)
n1 (S F3 - y /z)
0 0 .5 1 1.5 2 2.5
V ertica l to H orizonta l P G A ra tio(P G A -y/x ; P G A -y/z)
0
0 .25
0.5
0 .75
1
1.25
max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent @
col
with
V-E
Q /
with
out V
-EQ
@ n1 (S M 1 - y /x)
@ vert.(S M 3 - y/x)
@ vert.(S M 3 - y/z)
@ n2 (S M 2 - y/z)
B rid g e 8 w ith n o n -lin ea r M -P h i re la tio n sh ip (w ith V -E Q / w ith o u t V -E Q )
x
z n1
n2
Bridge #8 – Response Ratio vs. PGA RatioBridge #8 – Response Ratio vs. PGA Ratio
Non-Linear(3EQ/2EQ)
Non-Linear(3EQ/2EQ)
Vertical to Horizontal PGA Ratios Vertical to Horizontal PGA Ratios
Vertical to Horizontal PGA Ratios Vertical to Horizontal PGA Ratios
Max
Acc
eler
atio
n R
atio
Max
Dis
pla
cem
ent
Rat
io
Max
Sec
tion
For
ce R
atio
Max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent
Rat
io
39
0 0.4 0 .8 1.2 1.6 2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.4
0 .8
1 .2
max
Acc
eler
atio
n R
atio
@C
IPno
n-lin
ear
/ lin
ear
Long i.(A 1 - x)
V erti. (A 2 - y)
T rans.(A 3 - z)
0 0 .4 0 .8 1.2 1.6 2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.4
0 .8
1 .2
1 .6
max
Rel
. Dis
plac
emen
t Rat
io @
col_
top
non-
linea
r / l
inea
r
Long i.(U 1 - x)
V erti. (U 2 - y)
T rans.(U 3 - z)
B rid g e 8 : n o n -lin ea r / lin ea r resp o n se ( w ith V -E Q )
0 0.4 0 .8 1.2 1.6 2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.4
0 .8
1 .2
1 .6
max
Sec
tion
For
ce R
atio
@co
lno
n-lin
ear
/ lin
ear
n2 (S F2 - x)
V erti. (S F1 - y)
n1 (S F3 - z)
0 0 .4 0 .8 1.2 1.6 2
P G A -x ; P G A -y ; P G A -z
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent R
atio
@co
lno
n-lin
ear
/ lin
ear
@ n1 (S M 1 - x)
@ n2 (S M 2 - z)
@ vert.(S M 3 - y)
B rid g e 8 : n o n -lin ea r / lin ea r resp o n se ( w ith V -E Q )
x
z n1
n2
Bridge #8 – Response Ratio vs. PGABridge #8 – Response Ratio vs. PGANon-
LinearLinear
Non-LinearLinear
Max
Acc
eler
atio
n R
atio
Max
Dis
pla
cem
ent
Rat
io
Max
Sec
tion
For
ce R
atio
Max
Sec
tion
Mom
ent
Rat
io
PGA along x, y, and z directions
PGA along x, y, and z directions PGA along x, y, and z directions
PGA along x, y, and z directions
40
Bridge #8 – Section Moment-Curvature CurveBridge #8 – Section Moment-Curvature Curve
0 0.05 0.1 0.15C urvature (rad/m )
-4000000
-2000000
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
Mom
ent
(N
-m)
M -ph i : A baqus
M -ph i : R esponse2000
M -ph i : H and & FEM A
41
Bridge #4 – Bending vs Torsional Moment RatioBridge #4 – Bending vs Torsional Moment Ratio
Bridge#4 3EQ –
Linear
M@n1 M@n2 T T/M1 T/M2 M1/T M2/T
SM1_col SM2_col SM3_col SM3/SM1 SM3/SM2 SM1/SM3 SM2/SM3
Bin4
A-CO2 6.73E+06 9.74E+06 6.63E+02 9.85E-05 6.81E-05 1.02E+04 1.47E+04A-CWC 8.18E+06 8.90E+06 5.62E+02 6.87E-05 6.31E-05 1.46E+04 1.58E+04A-EJS 8.64E+06 7.54E+06 4.91E+02 5.68E-05 6.51E-05 1.76E+04 1.54E+04A-LBR 1.51E+07 1.53E+07 5.85E+02 3.88E-05 3.83E-05 2.58E+04 2.61E+04MUL 1.20E+07 1.20E+07 4.04E+02 3.37E-05 3.36E-05 2.97E+04 2.98E+04RIO 1.32E+07 8.94E+06 4.33E+02 3.29E-05 4.84E-05 3.04E+04 2.06E+04
A-CAS 1.62E+07 1.61E+07 6.98E+02 4.32E-05 4.34E-05 2.31E+04 2.30E+04A-ZAK 8.14E+06 7.49E+06 4.89E+02 6.01E-05 6.53E-05 1.66E+04 1.53E+04H-PVY 1.22E+07 6.33E+06 3.69E+02 3.03E-05 5.83E-05 3.30E+04 1.72E+04PET 2.21E+07 1.81E+07 4.65E+02 2.10E-05 2.57E-05 4.76E+04 3.90E+04SPV 1.64E+07 1.05E+07 5.86E+02 3.56E-05 5.57E-05 2.81E+04 1.80E+04
WWT 1.01E+07 7.09E+06 5.63E+02 5.60E-05 7.95E-05 1.79E+04 1.26E+04
Bin7
HDA 6.60E+06 6.47E+06 1.98E+02 3.00E-05 3.06E-05 3.33E+04 3.26E+04H-SHP 3.16E+06 3.57E+06 2.98E+02 9.45E-05 8.35E-05 1.06E+04 1.20E+04L01 8.64E+06 4.38E+06 1.28E+02 1.48E-05 2.92E-05 6.76E+04 3.43E+04
A-CAS 6.13E+06 6.07E+06 2.69E+02 4.38E-05 4.43E-05 2.28E+04 2.26E+04A-OBR 4.15E+06 3.20E+06 3.87E+02 9.33E-05 1.21E-04 1.07E+04 8.26E+03A-ZAK 3.04E+06 2.80E+06 1.90E+02 6.25E-05 6.77E-05 1.60E+04 1.48E+04H-Z14 6.48E+06 5.04E+06 1.06E+02 1.64E-05 2.11E-05 6.09E+04 4.74E+04
RIO 4.93E+06 3.38E+06 1.66E+02 3.38E-05 4.92E-05 2.96E+04 2.03E+04STN 4.30E+06 2.80E+06 1.82E+02 4.24E-05 6.51E-05 2.36E+04 1.54E+04WWT 3.37E+06 2.46E+06 2.12E+02 6.29E-05 8.60E-05 1.59E+04 1.16E+04
* Note : Moment is taken at the middle of column.
42
Bridge #4 – Bending vs Torsional Moment RatioBridge #4 – Bending vs Torsional Moment Ratio
Bridge#4 3EQ – non-
linear
M@n1 M@n2 T T/M1 T/M2 M1/T M2/T
SM1_col SM2_col SM3_col SM3/SM1 SM3/SM2 SM1/SM3 SM2/SM3
Bin4
A-CO2 5.68E+06 6.92E+06 6.11E+02 1.07E-04 8.83E-05 9.30E+03 1.13E+04A-CWC 6.63E+06 6.97E+06 4.99E+02 7.52E-05 7.16E-05 1.33E+04 1.40E+04A-EJS 6.51E+06 6.19E+06 4.56E+02 7.00E-05 7.37E-05 1.43E+04 1.36E+04A-LBR 6.62E+06 7.05E+06 5.68E+02 8.58E-05 8.06E-05 1.17E+04 1.24E+04MUL 6.50E+06 7.05E+06 3.53E+02 5.43E-05 5.01E-05 1.84E+04 2.00E+04RIO 7.05E+06 6.81E+06 3.42E+02 4.85E-05 5.02E-05 2.06E+04 1.99E+04
A-CAS 7.05E+06 7.03E+06 6.92E+02 9.82E-05 9.84E-05 1.02E+04 1.02E+04A-ZAK 6.11E+06 6.48E+06 4.66E+02 7.62E-05 7.19E-05 1.31E+04 1.39E+04H-PVY 7.05E+06 5.89E+06 3.66E+02 5.19E-05 6.21E-05 1.93E+04 1.61E+04PET 7.05E+06 7.05E+06 4.59E+02 6.51E-05 6.51E-05 1.54E+04 1.54E+04SPV 7.05E+06 7.02E+06 5.47E+02 7.76E-05 7.79E-05 1.29E+04 1.28E+04
WWT 6.86E+06 5.77E+06 5.26E+02 7.67E-05 9.12E-05 1.30E+04 1.10E+04
Bin7
HDA 4.68E+06 5.91E+06 1.95E+02 4.16E-05 3.29E-05 2.40E+04 3.04E+04H-SHP 2.55E+06 2.89E+06 3.06E+02 1.20E-04 1.06E-04 8.31E+03 9.44E+03L01 6.40E+06 4.01E+06 1.23E+02 1.91E-05 3.05E-05 5.23E+04 3.28E+04
A-CAS 5.05E+06 4.64E+06 2.64E+02 5.22E-05 5.68E-05 1.92E+04 1.76E+04A-OBR 3.29E+06 3.12E+06 3.91E+02 1.19E-04 1.25E-04 8.43E+03 7.99E+03A-ZAK 2.59E+06 2.80E+06 1.79E+02 6.90E-05 6.40E-05 1.45E+04 1.56E+04H-Z14 5.10E+06 4.16E+06 1.01E+02 1.98E-05 2.43E-05 5.05E+04 4.12E+04
RIO 4.27E+06 3.06E+06 1.50E+02 3.51E-05 4.90E-05 2.85E+04 2.04E+04STN 3.28E+06 2.57E+06 1.71E+02 5.22E-05 6.65E-05 1.91E+04 1.50E+04WWT 2.87E+06 2.25E+06 2.05E+02 7.15E-05 9.12E-05 1.40E+04 1.10E+04
* Note : Moment is taken at the middle of column.
43
Bridge #8 – Bending vs Torsional Moment RatioBridge #8 – Bending vs Torsional Moment Ratio
Bridge#8 3EQ – Linear
Mx Mz T T/Mx T/Mz Mx/T Mz/T
SM1_col SM2_col SM3_col SM3/SM1 SM3/SM2 SM1/SM3 SM2/SM3
Bin4
A-FLE 1.85E+07 7.17E+06 6.97E+05 3.77E-02 9.72E-02 26.55 10.29 ATS 2.47E+07 5.68E+06 9.58E+05 3.88E-02 1.69E-01 25.76 5.93
A-ZAC 3.00E+07 5.09E+06 1.13E+06 3.77E-02 2.22E-01 26.53 4.50 HCH 1.78E+07 4.39E+06 7.24E+05 4.07E-02 1.65E-01 24.59 6.06
HWA011 1.60E+07 3.96E+06 6.14E+05 3.85E-02 1.55E-01 26.00 6.46 HWA013 2.89E+07 4.87E+06 9.60E+05 3.32E-02 1.97E-01 30.09 5.07 H-Z14 1.62E+07 5.57E+06 5.88E+05 3.62E-02 1.06E-01 27.61 9.47 KAU020 1.82E+07 3.09E+06 6.14E+05 3.38E-02 1.99E-01 29.57 5.04 MUL 2.22E+07 3.64E+06 8.08E+05 3.64E-02 2.22E-01 27.48 4.50 NPS 1.75E+07 1.33E+07 7.02E+05 4.01E-02 5.28E-02 24.96 18.94
Bin7
A2E 7.76E+06 1.74E+06 3.08E+05 3.97E-02 1.77E-01 25.18 5.66 A-WHD 6.96E+06 3.78E+06 2.70E+05 3.88E-02 7.15E-02 25.80 13.99 A-ZAC 1.08E+07 1.84E+06 4.08E+05 3.77E-02 2.22E-01 26.53 4.50 BUR 1.02E+07 1.43E+06 3.65E+05 3.56E-02 2.56E-01 28.06 3.91 CCN 5.77E+06 1.73E+06 2.56E+05 4.43E-02 1.48E-01 22.59 6.77 DHM 8.61E+06 1.95E+06 3.19E+05 3.70E-02 1.63E-01 27.01 6.12
H-PV1 8.00E+06 2.10E+06 2.53E+05 3.16E-02 1.20E-01 31.69 8.31 IND 6.96E+06 1.03E+06 2.58E+05 3.70E-02 2.51E-01 27.00 3.98 IZN 6.15E+06 1.57E+06 2.02E+05 3.28E-02 1.29E-01 30.52 7.76 KAU 6.57E+06 1.12E+06 2.22E+05 3.38E-02 1.99E-01 29.57 5.04 L01 7.52E+06 2.10E+06 3.28E+05 4.36E-02 1.57E-01 22.92 6.38 YER 4.29E+06 1.76E+06 1.62E+05 3.78E-02 9.23E-02 26.46 10.84
* Note : Moment is taken at base of column.
44
Bridge #8 – Bending vs Torsional Moment RatioBridge #8 – Bending vs Torsional Moment Ratio
Bridge#83EQ – non-
linear
Mx Mz T T/Mx T/Mz Mx/T Mz/T
SM1_col SM2_col SM3_col SM3/SM1 SM3/SM2 SM1/SM3 SM2/SM3
Bin4
A-FLE 1.29E+07 1.13E+07 4.52E+05 3.49E-02 3.98E-02 28.62 25.11 ATS 9.04E+06 6.77E+06 4.15E+05 4.59E-02 6.13E-02 21.77 16.30 A-ZAC 1.09E+07 8.49E+06 5.74E+05 5.26E-02 6.76E-02 19.02 14.79 HCH 8.92E+06 5.54E+06 3.67E+05 4.11E-02 6.62E-02 24.31 15.10 HWA011 8.89E+06 6.29E+06 3.10E+05 3.49E-02 4.93E-02 28.66 20.30 HWA013 9.11E+06 6.20E+06 4.53E+05 4.97E-02 7.30E-02 20.10 13.69 H-Z14 9.53E+06 8.22E+06 3.03E+05 3.18E-02 3.69E-02 31.45 27.13 KAU020 8.11E+06 4.95E+06 2.65E+05 3.27E-02 5.35E-02 30.61 18.68 MUL 9.41E+06 7.41E+06 5.06E+05 5.37E-02 6.82E-02 18.62 14.66 NPS 1.39E+07 1.25E+07 5.37E+05 3.86E-02 4.30E-02 25.88 23.23
Bin7
A2E 7.15E+06 3.03E+06 1.32E+05 1.84E-02 4.34E-02 54.34 23.04 A-WHD 8.01E+06 4.44E+06 1.83E+05 2.29E-02 4.13E-02 43.73 24.23 A-ZAC 8.21E+06 3.65E+06 2.19E+05 2.67E-02 6.01E-02 37.42 16.63 BUR 7.91E+06 2.53E+06 2.02E+05 2.56E-02 8.01E-02 39.04 12.48 CCN 7.35E+06 2.83E+06 1.79E+05 2.43E-02 6.32E-02 41.11 15.82 DHM 7.11E+06 3.59E+06 1.70E+05 2.40E-02 4.75E-02 41.71 21.06 H-PV1 8.10E+06 3.93E+06 2.33E+05 2.88E-02 5.94E-02 34.71 16.83 IND 7.72E+06 2.33E+06 2.13E+05 2.76E-02 9.12E-02 36.29 10.96 IZN 4.15E+06 2.40E+06 7.46E+04 1.80E-02 3.10E-02 55.62 32.22 KAU 7.36E+06 2.00E+06 1.28E+05 1.74E-02 6.44E-02 57.33 15.54 L01 7.48E+06 4.21E+06 2.07E+05 2.77E-02 4.93E-02 36.07 20.29 YER 5.34E+06 2.91E+06 1.11E+05 2.08E-02 3.83E-02 48.03 26.14
45
Bridge #4 – Bending vs Torsional Moment RatioBridge #4 – Bending vs Torsional Moment Ratio
Bridge#4No Hinge
3EQ – Linear
M@n1 M@n2 T T/M1 T/M2 M1/T M2/T
SM1_col SM2_col SM3_col SM3/SM1 SM3/SM2 SM1/SM3 SM2/SM3
Bin4
A-CO2 2.36E+07 2.01E+07 2.37E+05 1.00E-02 1.18E-02 99.6 84.8 A-CWC 2.41E+07 2.18E+07 3.25E+05 1.35E-02 1.49E-02 74.1 67.0 A-EJS 2.52E+07 1.27E+07 2.21E+05 8.76E-03 1.75E-02 114.1 57.3 A-LBR 2.38E+07 1.53E+07 2.20E+05 9.24E-03 1.44E-02 108.2 69.7 MUL 1.89E+07 7.64E+06 1.54E+05 8.17E-03 2.02E-02 122.4 49.6 RIO 2.60E+07 1.67E+07 2.01E+05 7.74E-03 1.20E-02 129.3 83.4 A-CAS 2.88E+07 1.44E+07 3.85E+05 1.34E-02 2.67E-02 74.7 37.4 A-ZAK 2.26E+07 1.71E+07 2.47E+05 1.09E-02 1.45E-02 91.7 69.2 H-PVY 2.82E+07 1.59E+07 2.71E+05 9.62E-03 1.71E-02 103.9 58.6 PET 2.21E+07 1.40E+07 2.73E+05 1.24E-02 1.95E-02 80.7 51.3 SPV 2.21E+07 1.49E+07 3.09E+05 1.40E-02 2.07E-02 71.4 48.3 WWT 2.27E+07 2.91E+07 4.94E+05 2.18E-02 1.70E-02 45.9 58.9
Bin7
HDA 6.15E+06 5.31E+06 8.66E+04 1.41E-02 1.63E-02 71.1 61.3 H-SHP 5.23E+06 6.49E+06 1.36E+05 2.60E-02 2.10E-02 38.4 47.7 L01 7.49E+06 5.94E+06 9.55E+04 1.28E-02 1.61E-02 78.4 62.2 A-CAS 1.09E+07 5.46E+06 1.46E+05 1.34E-02 2.68E-02 74.8 37.4 A-OBR 8.54E+06 6.65E+06 1.14E+05 1.33E-02 1.71E-02 75.3 58.6 A-ZAK 8.50E+06 6.40E+06 9.37E+04 1.10E-02 1.47E-02 90.7 68.2 H-Z14 8.39E+06 6.01E+06 9.43E+04 1.12E-02 1.57E-02 88.9 63.7 RIO 9.77E+06 6.31E+06 7.70E+04 7.88E-03 1.22E-02 127.0 81.9 STN 9.40E+06 6.70E+06 1.13E+05 1.21E-02 1.69E-02 82.8 59.0 WWT 7.36E+06 1.04E+07 1.83E+05 2.49E-02 1.76E-02 40.2 56.9
* Note : Moment is taken in the middle of column.
46
Bridge #4 – Bending vs Torsional Moment RatioBridge #4 – Bending vs Torsional Moment Ratio
Bridge#4 No Hinge
3EQ – non-
Linear
M@n1 M@n2 T T/M1 T/M2 M1/T M2/T
SM1_col SM2_col SM3_col SM3/SM1 SM3/SM2 SM1/SM3 SM2/SM3
Bin4
A-CO2 2.19E+07 2.04E+07 2.63E+05 1.20E-02 1.29E-02 83.4 77.6 A-CWC 2.35E+07 2.17E+07 3.03E+05 1.29E-02 1.40E-02 77.5 71.5 A-EJS 2.60E+07 1.25E+07 2.02E+05 7.75E-03 1.62E-02 129.1 61.9 A-LBR 2.17E+07 1.49E+07 2.22E+05 1.02E-02 1.49E-02 97.9 67.0 MUL 1.96E+07 8.05E+06 1.58E+05 8.06E-03 1.96E-02 124.0 51.0 RIO 2.62E+07 1.74E+07 2.07E+05 7.90E-03 1.19E-02 126.5 84.0 A-CAS 2.73E+07 1.50E+07 3.87E+05 1.41E-02 2.58E-02 70.7 38.7 A-ZAK 2.38E+07 1.77E+07 2.53E+05 1.06E-02 1.43E-02 94.3 70.1 H-PVY 3.20E+07 1.51E+07 2.66E+05 8.31E-03 1.76E-02 120.4 56.8 PET 2.27E+07 1.37E+07 2.83E+05 1.25E-02 2.06E-02 80.2 48.6 SPV 2.20E+07 1.47E+07 3.08E+05 1.40E-02 2.10E-02 71.5 47.6 WWT 2.31E+07 2.84E+07 5.27E+05 2.28E-02 1.86E-02 43.9 53.8
Bin7
HDA 6.08E+06 5.09E+06 9.34E+04 1.54E-02 1.83E-02 65.0 54.5 H-SHP 5.38E+06 5.76E+06 1.35E+05 2.51E-02 2.34E-02 39.8 42.7 L01 7.74E+06 5.65E+06 8.85E+04 1.14E-02 1.57E-02 87.4 63.8 A-CAS 1.04E+07 5.67E+06 1.47E+05 1.42E-02 2.59E-02 70.7 38.6 A-OBR 7.94E+06 6.43E+06 1.14E+05 1.44E-02 1.78E-02 69.4 56.2 A-ZAK 9.00E+06 6.63E+06 9.63E+04 1.07E-02 1.45E-02 93.4 68.8 H-Z14 8.33E+06 5.97E+06 1.06E+05 1.28E-02 1.78E-02 78.4 56.1 RIO 9.72E+06 6.58E+06 7.97E+04 8.20E-03 1.21E-02 122.0 82.6 STN 9.23E+06 6.80E+06 1.12E+05 1.21E-02 1.64E-02 82.6 60.8 WWT 7.45E+06 1.02E+07 1.97E+05 2.64E-02 1.92E-02 37.9 52.1
* Note : Moment is taken in the middle of column.
47
Preliminary ConclusionsPreliminary Conclusions
Vertical Motion Effects Only affect vertical response. Vertical response ratio increase as vertical to
horizontal PGA ratio increases, except for max section moment.
Vertical responses increase almost linearly with max vertical PGA.
Non-linear Flexural Behavior Effects Not significant in transverse direction. Max longitudinal response ratio decreases as
PGA increases, which means the non-linearity effects is more significant in strong earthquakes than in small ones.
48
Future Research PlanFuture Research Plan Perform high quality pretest simulations
of test specimens with realistic loading and boundary conditions Provide guidance for tests conducted at UIUC Optimize number and parameters of test
specimens Identify realistic loading and boundary
conditions Integrate various analytical models into the
framework of UI-Simcor for pseudo-dynamic hybrid testing
49
UCLA Contribution: Post-test Model DevelopmentUCLA Contribution: Post-test Model Development Use test results to develop accurate
shear-flexure interaction and axial-shear-flexure models for beam-column elements Improve existing models with better shear-
flexure interaction representation Investigate the effect of shear-axial-flexure
interaction in the presence of high vertical motion
Parametric analytical studies to develop design equations and procedures
Parametric assessment and improvement of code shear equations
50
UCLA Contribution: Post-test System AnalysisUCLA Contribution: Post-test System Analysis Perform system analysis of bridge
systems using the improved component models of columns
Derive probabilistic fragility relationships for RC bridges including axial-shear-flexure interaction
Develop recommendations for bridge column design to account for reduced shear capacity due to combined loading conditions