43
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 Thousand Barrels per Day Year Eagle Ford Bakken All Other Plays DRILL, BABY, DRILL CAN UNCONVENTIONAL FUELS USHER IN A NEW ERA OF ENERGY ABUNDANCE? J. David Hughes February 2013 Production Figures & Maps Shale Gas & Tight Oil

Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A series of graphs and maps detailing production of shale gas and shale oil (tight oil) in the US, based on an analysis of over 63,000 wells in every shale play in the country.The full report can be found at shalebubble.org/drill-baby-drill.

Citation preview

Page 1: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

Thou

sand

Bar

rels

per

Day

Year

Eagle Ford

Bakken

All Other Plays

DRILL, BABY, DRILL CAN UNCONVENTIONAL FUELS USHER IN A NEW ERA

OF ENERGY ABUNDANCE?

J. David Hughes February 2013

Production Figures & Maps

Shale Gas & Tight Oil

Page 2: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

(Data from EIA updated to September, 2011; http://www.eia.gov/oil_gas/rpd/shale_gas.jpg )

Page 3: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

Shale gas production by play, 2000 through May 2012

(data from DIdesktop, September, 2012, fitted with 3 month centered moving average including data up to June, 2012)

0

5

10

15

20

25

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Billi

on C

ubic

Fee

t per

Day

Year

Other Austin Chalk Bone Spring Bossier Antrim Niobrara Bakken Woodford Eagle Ford Fayetteville Marcellus Barnett Haynesville

Barnett Haynesville

Shale  gas  produc/on  appears  to  be  plateauing  as  of  late  2011.  

Page 4: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Billi

on C

ubic

Fee

t per

Day

Shale Play

Shale gas production by play, May 2012

(data from DI Desktop, September, 2012, for production in most cases through May-June, 2012)

Top 3 Plays: 66% of Total Top 6 Plays: 88% of Total

Page 5: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Number of Producing W

ells Pr

oduc

tion

(Bill

ion

Cubi

c Fe

et p

er D

ay)

Year

Production

Number of producing wells

Shale gas production and number of producing wells for the Hayesville play, 2008 through May 2012

(data from DI Desktop, HPDI, September, 2012)

Produc/on  peaked  in  December  2012,  despite  con/nued  growth  in  the  number  of  opera/ng  wells.  

Page 6: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46

Gas

Prod

uctio

n (M

cf p

er D

ay)

Months on Production

Yearly Declines: First Year = 68%

Second Year = 49% Third Year = 50%

Fourth Year = 48%

Type decline curve for Haynesville shale gas wells

(data from DI Desktop, HPDI, September, 2012)

Based  on  data  from  the  four  years  this  shale  play  has  been  in  produc/on.  

Page 7: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

High

est M

onth

ly P

rodu

ctio

n (M

cf/d

ay)

Percentage of Wells

Distribution of well quality in the Haynesville play, as defined by the highest one-month rate of production over well life

Median = 7954 mcf/day Mean = 8201 mcf/day

The  x-­‐axis  indicates  the  cumula/ve  percentage  of  wells,  ordered  from  lowest  to  highest  quality.  The  highest  one-­‐month  rate  of  produc/on  is  typically  achieved  in  the    first  or  second  month  aGer  well    comple/on.  

Page 8: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Number of Operating pre-2011 W

ells Gas

Prod

uctio

n (B

illio

n cu

bic

feet

/day

)

Year

Production from pre-2011 wells Number of pre-2011 wells

Overall field decline for the Haynesville play, based on production from wells drilled prior to 2011

(data from DI Desktop, HPDI, September, 2012)

Overall Field Decline = 52%

In  order  to  offset  the  52  percent  decline  rate  for  the  field,  774  new  wells  producing  at  2011  rates  are  required.  

Page 9: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

Haynesville Well Quality - Top 20% with Highest One Month Production of >10989 mcf/day in black

20  miles  

30  miles  

Page 10: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7 Num

ber of Producing Wells

Prod

uctio

n (B

illio

n Cu

bic

Feet

per

Day

)

Year

Production Number of producing wells

Shale gas production and number of producing wells for the Barnett shale play, 2000 through May 2012

(data from DI Desktop, HPDI, September, 2012)

Produc/on  plateaued  in  December  2012,  despite  con/nued  growth  in  the  number  of  opera/ng  wells  

Page 11: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56

Gas

Prod

uctio

n (M

cf p

er D

ay)

Months on Production

Yearly Declines: First Year = 61%

Second Year = 32% Third Year = 24%

Fourth Year = 18% Fifth Year = 15%

Type decline curve for Barnett shale gas wells

(data from DI Desktop, HPDI, September, 2012)

Based  on  data  from  the  most  recent  five  years  of  this  play’s  produc/on.  

Page 12: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

High

est M

onth

ly P

rodu

ctio

n (M

cf/d

ay)

Percentage of Wells

Distribution of well quality in the Barnett play, as defined by the highest one-month rate of production over well life

Median = 1332 mcf/day Mean = 1619 mcf/day

The  x-­‐axis  indicates  the  cumula/ve  percentage  of  wells,  ordered  from  lowest  to  highest  quality.  The  highest  one-­‐month  rate  of  produc/on  is  typically  achieved  in  the    first  or  second  month  aGer  well    comple/on.  

Page 13: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Number of Operating pre-2011 W

ells Gas

Prod

uctio

n (B

illio

n cu

bic

feet

/day

)

Year

Production from pre-2011 wells

Number of pre-2011 wells

Overall field decline for the Barnett play based on production from wells drilled prior to 2011

(data from DI Desktop, HPDI, September, 2012)

Overall Field Decline = 30%

In  order  to  offset  the  30  percent  decline  rate  for  the  field,  1,507  new  wells  producing  at  2011  rates  are  required.  

Page 14: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

Barnett Well Quality - Top 20% with Highest One-Month Production of >2436 mcf/day in black

30  miles  

Page 15: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

5  miles  

2  miles  

Page 16: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

0

1

2

3

4

5

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Number of Producing W

ells Pr

oduc

tion

(Bill

ion

Cubi

c Fe

et p

er D

ay)

Year

Production Number of producing wells

Shale gas production and number of producing wells for the Marcellus shale play, 2006 through December 2011

(data from DI Desktop, HPDI, September, 2012)

The  steep  growth  in  produc/on  during  and  aGer  2009  reflects  the  applica/on  of  mul/-­‐stage  horizontal  fracturing  technology.  

Page 17: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46

Gas

Prod

uctio

n (M

cf p

er D

ay)

Months on Production

Yearly Declines: First Year = 47%

Second Year = 66% Third Year = 71%

Fourth Year = 47%

Type decline curve for Marcellus shale gas wells.

(data from DI Desktop, HPDI, September, 2012)

Based  on  data  from  the  most  recent  four  years  of  this  play’s  produc/on.  

Page 18: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

High

est M

onth

ly P

rodu

ctio

n (M

cf/d

ay)

Percentage of Wells

Distribution of well quality in the Marcellus play, as defined by the highest one-month rate of production over well life

Median = 1133 mcf/day Mean = 1947 mcf/day

The  x-­‐axis  indicates  the  cumula/ve  percentage  of  wells,  ordered  from  lowest  to  highest  quality.  The  highest  one-­‐month  rate  of  produc/on  is  typically  achieved  in  the    first  or  second  month  aGer  well    comple/on.  

Page 19: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Number of Operating pre-2011 W

ells Gas

Prod

uctio

n (B

illio

n cu

bic

feet

/day

)

Year

Production from pre-2011 wells Number of pre-2011 wells

Overall field decline for the Marcellus play based on production from wells drilled prior to 2011

(data from DI Desktop, HPDI, September, 2012)

Overall Field Decline = 29%

In  order  to  offset  the  29  percent  decline  rate  for  the  field,  561  new  wells  producing  at  2011  rates  are  required.  

Page 20: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

Marcellus Well Quality - Top 20% with Highest One-Month Production of >3603 mcf/day in black

100  miles  

Page 21: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

20  miles  

30  miles  

Page 22: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

5

10

15

20

25

May-11 Jul-11 Sep-11 Nov-11 Jan-12 Mar-12 May-12

Billi

on C

ubic

Fee

t per

Day

Year

Other Austin Chalk Bone Spring Bossier Antrim Niobrara Bakken Woodford Eagle Ford Fayetteville Marcellus Barnett Haynesville

Shale gas production by play, May 2011 through May 2012

(data from DIdesktop, September, 2012, fitted with 3 month centered moving average including data up to June, 2012)

Barnett

Haynesville

Marcellus

Fayetteville

Eagle Ford Woodford

Shale  gas  produc/on  clearly  peaked  in  December  2011  and  is  now  on  an  undula/ng  plateau.  

Page 23: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Thou

sand

Bar

rels

per

Day

Year

Other Woodford Marcellus Monterey-Tremblor Austin Chalk Spraberry Barnett Permian Delaware Midland Granite Wash Niobrara Bone Spring Eagle Ford Bakken

Tight oil production by play, 2000 through May 2012

Bakken

(data from DIdesktop, September, 2012, fitted with 3 month centered moving average including data up to June, 2012)

Together  the  Bakken  and  Eagle  Ford  comprise  81  percent  of  /ght  oil  produc/on.  

Page 24: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Thou

sand

Bar

rels

per

Day

Shale Play

Tight oil production by play, May 2012

(data from DI Desktop/HPDI, September, 2012, for production in most cases through May-June, 2012)

Top 2 Plays = 81% of Total Top 5 Plays = 92% of Total

Page 25: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Number of Producing W

ells Pr

oduc

tion

(Tho

usan

d Ba

rrels

per

Day

)

Year

Production

Number of producing wells

Tight oil production and number of producing wells for the Bakken shale play, 2000 through May 2012

(data from DI Desktop, HPDI, September, 2012)

Page 26: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0 12 24 36 48 60

Oil P

rodu

ctio

n (B

arre

ls p

er D

ay)

Months on Production

Yearly Declines: First Year = 69%

Second Year = 39% Third Year = 26%

Fourth Year = 27% Fifth Year = 33%

Type decline curve for Bakken tight oil wells

(data from DI Desktop, HPDI, September, 2012)

Based  on  data  from  the  most  recent  66  months  of  this  play’s  oil  produc/on.  

Page 27: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

High

est M

onth

ly P

rodu

ctio

n (B

bls/

day)

Percentage of Wells

Distribution of well quality in the Bakken play, as defined by the highest one-month rate of production over well life

Median = 341 bbls/day Mean = 400 bbls/day

The  x-­‐axis  indicates  the  cumula/ve  percentage  of  wells,  ordered  from  lowest  to  highest  quality.  The  highest  one-­‐month  rate  of  produc/on  is  typically  achieved  in  the    first  or  second  month  aGer  well    comple/on.  

Page 28: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Number of Operating pre-2011 W

ells Oil P

rodu

ctio

n (T

hous

and

bbls

/day

)

Year

Production from pre-2011 wells Number of pre-2011 wells

Overall field decline for the Bakken play based on production from wells drilled prior to 2011

(data from DI Desktop, HPDI, September, 2012)

Overall Field Decline = 40%

In  order  to  offset  the  40  percent  decline  rate  for  the  field,  819  new  wells  producing  at  2011  rates  are  required.  

Page 29: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

Number of Producing W

ells Pr

oduc

tion

(Tho

usan

d Ba

rrels

per

Day

)

Year

Production

Number of producing wells

Future oil production profile for the Bakken play, assuming current rate of new well additions

(data from DI Desktop, HPDI, September, 2012)

Peak 973 Kbbls/day in 2017 Locations run out in 2017 at 11725

operating wells

Assumptions: -  Current drilling rate of 1500 wells/year maintained -  EIA estimate of 9767 remaining locations as of 1/1/2010 is correct - Well quality is maintained at 2011 levels

This  scenario  assumes  constant  new  well  quality  and  EIA  es/mate  of  remaining  available  well  loca/ons.  Produc/on  declines  at  the  overall  field  rate  of  40  percent  aGer  peak  in  2017.  

Page 30: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

Number of Producing W

ells Pr

oduc

tion

(Tho

usan

d Ba

rrels

per

Day

)

Year

Production at 1500 wells/year Production at 2000 wells/year Drilling Rate 1500 wells/year Drilling Rate 2000 wells/year

Future oil production profiles for the Bakken play, assuming current rate of well additions compared to a scenario of 2,000 new wells per year

(data from DI Desktop, HPDI, September, 2012)

Peak 973 Kbbls/day in 2017 if 1500

wells added each year

Peak 1099 Kbbls/day in 2015 if 2000

wells added each year

Both  scenarios  assume  constant  new  well  quality  and  the  EIA  es/mate  of  11,725  total  available  well  loca/ons.  Produc/on  declines  aGer  peak  in  both  scenarios  at  the  overall  field  rate  of  40  percent.  

Page 31: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

Bakken Well Quality - Top 20% with Highest One-Month Production of >589 bbls/day in black

40  miles  

Page 32: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

Bakken Well Quality – Sweet Spot - Top 20% with Highest One Month Production of >589 bbls/day in black

20  miles  

Page 33: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

Distribution of horizontal wells in the Parshall “sweet spot” of the Bakken

3 Miles

See  right-­‐hand  side  of  previous  slide.  This  area  is  almost  completely  saturated  with  wells  although  there  are  s/ll  a  few  loca/ons  leG.  Green  symbols  indicate  rigs  drilling  as  of  December  17,  2012.  

Page 34: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2009 2010 2011 2012

Number of Producing W

ells Pr

oduc

tion

(Tho

usan

d Ba

rrels

per

Day

)

Year

Production

Number of producing wells

Petroleum liquids production and number of producing wells for the Eagle Ford shale play, 2009 through June 2012

(data from DI Desktop, HPDI, September, 2012)

Page 35: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

1 13 25 37 49

Oil P

rodu

ctio

n (B

arre

ls p

er D

ay)

Months on Production

Production 2008-2011

Production first 5 months of 2012

Yearly Declines: First Year = 60%

Second Year = 64% Third Year = 72%

Fourth Year = 46%

Type decline curve for Eagle Ford tight oil wells

(data from DI Desktop, HPDI, September, 2012)

Based  on  data  from  the  most  recent  50  months  through  year-­‐end  2011  of  this  play’s  produc/on.  Produc/on  for  the  first  five  months  of  2012  is  also  shown,  indica/ng  that  IP’s  are  rising  as  drilling  focuses  on  recently  defined  sweet  spots.  

Page 36: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

High

est M

onth

ly P

rodu

ctio

n (B

bls/

day)

Percentage of Wells

Distribution of well quality in the Eagle Ford play, as defined by the highest one-month rate of production over well life

Median = 292 bbls/day Mean = 437 bbls/day

The  x-­‐axis  indicates  the  cumula/ve  percentage  of  wells,  ordered  from  lowest  to  highest  quality.  The  highest  one-­‐month  rate  of  produc/on  is  typically  achieved  in  the    first  or  second  month  aGer  well    comple/on.  

Page 37: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Number of Operating pre-2011 W

ells Oil P

rodu

ctio

n (T

hous

and

bbls

/day

)

Year

Production from pre-2011 wells Number of pre-2011 wells

Overall field decline for the Eagle Ford play based on production from wells drilled prior to 2011

(data from DI Desktop, HPDI, September, 2012)

Overall Field Decline = 27%

The  actual  overall  field  decline  is  likely  steeper  than  shown  as  many  pre-­‐2011  wells  were  being  connected  over  the  subsequent  months  as  indicated  by  the  rising  well  count  in  2011  and  2012.  If  the  27  percent  rate  is  accepted,  it  would  require  723  new  wells  producing  at  2011  rates  to  offset  field  decline  each  year  from  current  produc/on  levels.  

Page 38: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

Future liquids production profile for the Eagle Ford play assuming current rate of new well additions

(data from DI Desktop, HPDI, September, 2012)

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2008 2013 2018 2023

Number of Producing W

ells Pr

oduc

tion

(Tho

usan

d Ba

rrels

per

Day

)

Year

Production Number of producing wells

Peak at 891 Kbbls/day in 2016

Locations run out in 2016 at 11406 operating wells

Assumptions: -  Current drilling rate of 1983 wells/year maintained -  Estimate of 11406 remaining locations as of 1/1/2010 is correct - Well quality is maintained at 2011 levels

This  scenario  assumes  constant  new  well  quality  and  EIA  es/mate  of  remaining  available  well  loca/ons.  Produc/on  declines  at  the  overall  field  rate  of  40  percent  aGer  peak  in  2016.  

Page 39: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

Future oil production profiles for the Eagle Ford play assuming current rate of new well additions compared to a scenario of 2,500 wells per year

(data from DI Desktop, HPDI, September, 2012)

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

2008 2013 2018 2023

Number of Producing W

ells Pr

oduc

tion

(Tho

usan

d Ba

rrels

per

Day

)

Year

Production at 1983 wells/year Production at 2500 wells/year Drilling rate 1983 wells/year Drilling rate 2500 wells/year

Peak 891 Kbbls/day 2016 if 1983

wells added each year

Peak 1031 Kbbls/day In 2015 if 2500

wells added each year

Both  scenarios  assume  constant  new  well  quality  at  2011  levels  and  the  EIA  es/mate  of  11,406  total  available  well  loca/ons.158  Produc/on  declines  aGer  peak  in  both  scenarios  at  the  overall  field  rate  of  40  percent.  

Page 40: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

Eagle Ford Well Quality - Top 20% with Highest One Month Production of >667 bbls/day in black

40  miles  

Page 41: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

20  miles  

10  miles  

Page 42: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

May-11 Jul-11 Sep-11 Nov-11 Jan-12 Mar-12 May-12

Thou

sand

Bar

rels

per

Day

Month

Eagle Ford Bakken Other Woodford Marcellus Monterey-Tremblor Austin Chalk Spraberry Barnett Permian Delaware Midland Granite Wash Niobrara

Tight oil production by play, May 2011 through May 2012

Bakken

(data from DIdesktop, September, 2012, fitted with 3 month centered moving average including data up to June, 2012)

Eagle Ford

Uncon. Oil

Yet to Find

 The  Bakken  and  Eagle  Ford  are  clearly  unique  among  /ght  oil  plays  in  the  United  States.  

Page 43: Shale Gas & Oil Production Figures (Drill, Baby, Drill)

Projection of tight oil production by play in the U.S. through 2025

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

Thou

sand

Bar

rels

per

Day

Year

Eagle Ford

Bakken

All Other Plays

Forecast

Nuclear

Gas

Coal

Hydro

Renewables

Oil

Transp

253, 234, 80

Residental

Industrial

Commercial

67, 112, 133

216, 178, 33

143, 189, 205

89, 108, 1

168, 163, 1

98, 98, 98

History

Based  on  vintaged  type  curve  produc/on,  the  number  of  drilling  loca/ons  projected  by  the  EIA  for  the  Bakken  and  Eagle  Ford  plays,  and  the  assump/on  of  con/nued  recent  growth  rates  in  the  other  plays.