Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Assignment for Urban Analysis
Citation preview
1
20.016 Urban Analysis
SHOP PATRONAGE V Hotel (Lavender) / Prinsep Street / Bliss Hotel (Chinatown)Clifford Mario Kosasih (1000294)
Goh Pei Xuan (1000286)
Ho Jia Jia Sharon (1000091) Neo Jun Hao Kevin Josiah (1000133)
Oor Eiffel (1000293)
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION 3
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 3
3. RESEARCH QUESTION 4
4. HYPOTHESES 4
5. PHOTOGRAPHIC MATERIAL 5
6. IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS FOR V HOTEL, PRINSEP STREET AND BLISS HOTEL OUTLETS 8
7. BIVARIATE SCATTER-PLOTS 11
8. CONCLUSION 12
9. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 13 10. BIBLIOGRAPHY 16
3
1. INTRODUCTIONIn a built environment, it is interesting to observe how the patronage of a retail business is a! ected by the attributes of its
location. This characteristics range from the most immediate context such as shop visibility, sidewalk width and building
size to the location accessibility and the presence of competitive/complementary clustering. This experiment aims to fi nd
a correlation between these di! erent characteristics of three Cheers stores (a convenience store) that are located within
the central region of Singapore with its patronage per day. The three Cheers stores are the Prinsep branch, the V Hotel
Lavender branch and the Bliss Hotel branch. To investigate the di! erent characteristics of the location, spatial accesibility
metrics and advanced spatial network analysis are utilised to understand the variation in patronage per day of these
three stores.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
The e! ect of location and its attributes to retail establishments’ business has been studied by various scholars. Porta, Strano,
Iacovello and Messora discovers that location decision of di! erent retail stores are a! ected primarily by street centrality
that leads to visibility and accessibility (2009, 463). When stores are concentrated in areas that are easily accessible and
the junction connecting di! erent activity nodes, there is a higher chance for that stores to capture people who are passing
by that location for unplanned visits, hence improving their patronage.
Furthermore, Sevtsuk (2014) also confi rms that the more accessible a location in a particular area is, the more likely that
location will become a retail establishment. This follows the fact that retail establishments want to attract as many people
as possible within its reach to increase its revenue. Thus, measures such as proximity to commercial activities, transit nodes
and road junctions contribute to the degree of accessibility of that location, which may result in the increase of patronage
of the retail establishments.
Other than the location centrality of retail establishments, Sevtsuk has also investigated the e! ect on the tendency of
clustering between stores that sell complementary and competitive goods with respect to the types of stores. While it is
observed that stores selling non-competing goods are generally clustering together, a more in-depth research suggests
that competitive clustering are more likely to be present among search goods such as clothings, apparel and restaurant
services as compared to convenience goods like liquor and groceries.
4
3. RESEARCH QUESTION
4. HYPOTHESES
To understand how location attributes infl uence the shop patronage per day of similar stores.
Our fi rst hypothesis was that shops with larger view shed have higher patronage per day. View shed is a measure of
visibility from the nearby roads. Porta and Strano (2009) believes that centrality of location will result in better visibility
and hence more favorable for the retail establishments.
Our second hypothesis was that shops with closer proximity with competitive businesses have lower patronage per day.
This follows Sevtsuk (2014) fi ndings that convenience stores selling non-search goods are less likely to be located nearby
other convenience store. This is because they sell similar and competing goods that require no comparison between store
to store, resulting in a lower patronage if they cluster together.
Our third hypothesis was that shops with closer proximity to more commercial activities have higher patronage per day.
This is measured by the GFA of the surrounding buildings which is interpreted to be proportional to the number of people
who are working or visiting the nearby buildings.
Our fourth hypothesis was that shops with closer proximity to transportation nodes with more tra" c fl ow have higher
patronage per day. Based on the fi ndings from Porta and Strano (2009), the more accessible the location is, the more
favorable it is for a retail establishment to be there. In this case, accessibility is measured in terms of the bus stops and
the number of tapouts on that bus stop. In this case, we assume that an increase in overall density of possible pedestrians
originating from transportation nodes at the location of the shop will result in higher patronage. However, this is with
consideration of the decay rate due to walking distance.
5
5. PHOTOGRAPHIC MATERIAL
V HOTEL CONTEXT
Supermarket
HDB Estate
7-Eleven
Condominium
Cheers at V Hotel
Community Centre
7-Eleven (MRT)
ICA Building
6PRINSEP STREET CONTEXT
Commerical Strip
POMO Shopping Centre
Cheers at Prinsep Street
NTUC Income O" ce
SOTA
Hotel Rendevous
7BLISS HOTEL CONTEXT
People’s Park Centre
Chinatown Point
Cheers at Bliss Hotel
HDB Estate
MRT Entrance
Shophouse 5-ft way
8
VIEW SHED
Perimeter of view shed: 570.71m
Patronage per day: 345
1
2
34
5
6
1
2
3
4
56
12
3
45
6
V Hotel Outlet Prinsep Street Outlet Bliss Hotel Outlet
65
321
4 65
321
4 65
321
4
Perimeter of view shed: 277.56m
Patronage per day: 365
Perimeter of view shed: 622.57m
Patronage per day: 579
Based on the view sheds of the three stores, it is seen that the larger the perimeter of the view shed, the higher the patronage per day. However, the relationship between the two factors is not directly proportional as even though the stores at V Hotel and Bliss Hotel have a similar patronage value, the perimeters of the view sheds are very di! erent, which could be due to other factors. Having a larger perimeter of view shed means that the store can be seen from more points, which increases the likelihood of pedestrians visiting the store and results in a higher patronage per day.
6. IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS FOR V HOTEL, PRINSEP STREET AND BLISS HOTEL OUTLETS
9
� �� �� � � � � � � ��� �� � � �Even though the Bliss Hotel outlet has a
higher gravity index as compared to the
Prinsep Street outlet, the average daily
patronage is much lower. This is due to the
fact that the shortest path from the building
points to the Bliss hotel outlet may not be
the preferred path by walkers due to various
reasons. Hence, these shoppers would
actually visit other competitor stores in the
area instead. Furthermore, most shoppers
make unplanned stopovers to Cheers.
COMPETITIVE CLUSTERING
Shops with closer proximity with competitive businesses have lower patronage per day. In the case for Cheers, we chose to compare
against 7-Eleven stores as its major competitor as these two brands are the leading convenience stores in Singapore. Hence, we included
points in the network representing the various 7-Eleven stores which could be found within 600m reach of our respective Cheers outlet.
Besides having the 7-Eleven stores as our competitors, we have aso included the 13 Cheers outlets as our competitors. After utilising the
‘unaFindClosestFacility’ tool, we were able to determine the building points which are closest to the competitor stores as well as to our
Cheers outlets, allowing us to understand the distribution of the immediate market among competitors. From these, the gravity index of
each of our Cheers outlets to the distributed building points (as highlighted with the red lines below) was also calculated and compared
against each other.
r: 13693g: 3936.795c: 4.37540s: 9810.326
r: 20878g: 13132.345c: 46.17749s: 17375.280
r: 30928g: 17077.151c: 5.43163s: 23124.473
The V Hotel outlet has an average daily
patronage of 345 people, which is the least
among the 3 outlets we have chosen. As
its gravity index is quite low at 3936.795,
it explains the lesser amount of people
arriving at that destination (weights taken
as the area, corresponding to the number of
people) after taking into distance decay.
The Prinsep Street outlet has the highest
amount of average daily patronage of 579
people, even though its gravity index is
lower than the Bliss hotel outlet. This might
be due to the composition of commercial
activities there, comprising of more o" ces
and shopping malls. The average building
heights at Prinsep are hence taller than
those near Bliss Hotel and the gravity index
does not take into account the height of the
buildings, resulting in a smaller value.
V Hotel Outlet Prinsep Street Outlet Bliss Hotel Outlet
10
Shops with closer proximity to more commercial activities have higher patronage per day. The commercial activities in the area were measured based on the GFA of commercial areas (shophouses, hotels, commercial buildings, and malls). The fi gures above were obtained with estimations made to the height of the buildings in the area according to our site obser-vation and information found online.
The shophouses in the Chinatown area (Bliss hotel) are mostly 4 storeys high. The commercial buildings are at an average of 6 storeys, hotels at 4, while malls at 3. The vicinity around the Cheers stall at prinsep has taller hotels and commercial buildings with an average of 12 storeys. Shophouses in this region mostly has 3 storeys. The commercial buildings in the vicinity of V Hotel is generally lower at a height of 4 storeys, with mostly 2 storeys shophouses.
With higher commercial activities in the vicinity, patronage is expected to be higher as volume of people increases. This is because the cheers stores will be servicing more people. Also, with more commercial activities as attraction points, the frequency of passers-by increases, possibly increasing patronage.
As we can see from the chart above, the Cheers store located at prinsep has the highest GFA of commercial activities within a 600m walking radii. It, too, has the highest patronage per day.
LocationTotal Commercial Area
(sqm)Patronage per day
V Hotel 170165.38 345
Prinsep Street 930322.10 579
Bliss Hotel 658805.00 365
NEARBY COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES
Bliss HotelPrinsepV hotel
11
7. BIVARIATE SCATTER-PLOTS
The Gravity index weighs the number of bus stops and tapouts per day and takes their distance into account. From these diagrams,
it can be seen that Cheers stores with a larger number of commuters coming from the bus stops result in a higher patronage per day,
as with a higher pedestrian density in that area, it increases the likelihood of them entering the store to purchase a good. However,
the proximity of bus stops to the Cheers stores do not a! ect their patronage signifi cantly (Diagram 2) as this is dependent on the
number and type of bus services available at the bus stop.
The Betweenness index indicates the frequency of pedestrians passing by the Cheers stores as they go from bus stops to the
surrounding buildings. Diagram 3 shows that as the number of passers-by increases, there is a higher patronage per day to the
Cheers stores. As trips to convenience stores are usually unplanned trips, passing by these stores would increase the probability of
passers-by entering the store to purchase a good. Therefore, with a higher frequency of passers-by, it increases the patronage of
the store.
Diagram 1: Relationship between proximity of
bus stop tapouts and patronage
Diagram 3: Relationship between
frequency of passers-by from bus stops
and patronage
Diagram 2: Relationship between proximity
of bus stop and patronage
ACCESSIBILITY
12
8. CONCLUSION
The four hypotheses that we have postulated in the beginning of the research hold true to a certain extent, considering
the assumptions made.
1. shops with larger view shed have higher patronage per day
2. shops with closer proximity with competitive businesses have lower patronage per day
3. shops with closer proximity to more commercial activities have higher patronage per day
4. shops with closer proximity to transportation nodes with more tra" c fl ow have higher patronage per day
We have managed to understand better the correlation between each location attributes to the patronage of each
stores. However, it is di" cult to justify the relative signifi cance of each location attributes with respect to the patronage
per day. Therefore, for future research, it would be better if we can design a model that takes into account these four
attributes to be able to come up with the relative signifi cance.
To improve the research, we could have counted pedestrians passing by the respective outlets. This can be done at
di! erent timings and intervals during various times of the day and the week. Hence for this research exercise, due to the
time constraints, it may not be justifi ed to take one or two sample to represent the overall pedestrian count.
13
9. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
These design improvements were suggested after taking into account the
patronage of convenience shops in relation to their urban envrionment.
1. Increase the glass to signage proportion
As shown in the images on the right, existing convenience shops at all
three locations have facades have a high proportion of glass. This allows
pedestrians to look at the variety of goods sold in the convenience stall.
The signage acts as a supporting element to the glass facade. It indicates
the chain’s name and colours. To break the transparency of the glass, some
convenience chains utilise printed decals on the glass facade.
Based on the view shed analysis, we realised that the visibility of the
convenience stalls were highly dependent on the visual impact of the
signage rather than the glass facade. This might suggest that the high
proportion of glass used in the facade discourages visibility. Therefore
by increasing the proportion of signage, the visual prominence of the
convenience shop is directly increased. The resultant view shed might be
greater.
However the high proportion of glass used in the facade does increase its
prominence at night. Light from within the convenience shop can be seen
from large distances. Nonetheless this occurs to many other shops with
similar proportion of glass facade. An increase in signage proportion would
also result in larger lit signage at night, giving a clearer indication of the
convenience shop’s presence.
14
2. Reduce distance between convenience stores and transportation nodes
The accessibility of a convenience store has a direct relation to its
patronage. In our analysis of convenience stores, transportation
nodes served as the points of origin for pedestrians. Hence the
walkability of routes taken to convenience shops in terms of
distance, has a proportional e! ect on the potential patronage of the
shops.
By reducing the distances between transportation nodes and
convenience shops, the overall walkability and accessibility
is improved, which might result in increased patronage. The
accessibility of the Bliss Hotel branch could be improved by
introducing a new bus stop or shifting the current bus stop nearer to
its location.
Cheers - Bliss Hotel
Cheers - Prinsep
15
3. Increase the width of walkways leading to shops
The walkability of pedestrian pathways along the existing convenience
shops can be improved to increase the patronage of shops. This
design intervention can take place at the Bliss Hotel branch, through
the increasing of the walkway width. This increases walkway capacity
for higher volumes of tra" c, which may potentially lead to greater
patronage. Alternatively, the perception of the walkway width could
be changed by reducing the thickness or porosity of the supporting
columns.
4. Increase regulatory distance between competitors to encourage a better distribution of convenience shops in an area
Based on the analysis of the distribution of the immediate market
among competitors in the same area, we understand that the relative
convenience of shops is highly dependent on the spatial distribution
competitors. Closer proxmity of competitors would indicate a smaller
overall service area, which implies higher competition between shops.
The introduction of a reulatory distance between competitors would
encourage a slightly more disperse spatial distribution of convenience
shops that might potentially widen the overall service area. The
decrease in competition and increase in proportion of captive market
with respect to individual service area might potentially increase
patronage.
Cheers - V Hotel
7-11
New
New
16
10. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Porta, S., Strano, E., Iacoviello, V., Messora, R., Latora, V., Cardillo, A., … Scellato, S. (2009).Street centrality and densities of retail and services in Bologna, Italy. Environment and PlanningB: Planning and Design, 36, 450–465.
Proudfoot, M. J. (1937). City Retail Structure. Economic Geography, 13(4), 425–428.
Vandell, K., & Carter, C. C. (1993). Retail Store Location and Market Analysis: A Review ofLiterature. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 1, 13–45.
Eppli, M., & Benjamin, J. (1994). The Evolution of Shopping Center Research. Journal of RealEstate Research, Vol. 9(1), pp. 5–32 .
Eppli, M., & Shilling, J. (1996). How Critical is a Good Location to a Regional Shopping Center?Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 12(3), 459–469.
Sevtsuk, A. (2014). Location and Agglomeration: the Distribution of Retail and Food Businessesin Dense Urban Neighborhoods. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1(21).
