1
0 100 50 40 60 30 70 20 80 10 90 TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF ACCIDENTS SPECIFICALLY DUE TO TEXTING AT THE WHEEL 0 100 50 40 60 30 70 20 80 10 90 TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF TEENAGERS WHO ADMIT TO TEXTING WHILE DRIVING 0 100 50 40 60 30 70 20 80 10 90 TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF ACCIDENTS CAUSED BY DISTRACTED DRIVING SHOULD STATES BAN TEXTING WHILE DRIVING? So far this year in the U.S. there have been an estimated 23 1 , 4 89 crashes caused by drivers using cell phones and texting. CURRENT LAWS AGAINST TEXTING WHILE DRIVING 2008 +1% 2009 +12% 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 2009 2007 2006 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2011 2011 2009 2008 2005 2009 2009 2009 2008 2010 2010 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2009 2010 2010 2008 +9% 2008 +0% BRAKING REACTION TIME AT 70 MPH U N I M PA I R E D 10 ft 0 ft 20 ft 30 ft 40 ft 50 ft 60 ft 70 ft LEGALLY DRUNK (add 4 feet) 10 ft 0 ft 20 ft 30 ft 40 ft 50 ft 60 ft 70 ft READING EMAIL (add 36 feet) 10 ft 0 ft 20 ft 30 ft 40 ft 50 ft 60 ft 70 ft SENDING A TEXT (add 70 feet) 10 ft 0 ft 20 ft 30 ft 40 ft 50 ft 60 ft 70 ft 0 100 50 40 60 30 70 20 80 10 90 TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF AMERICANS WHO ADMIT TO USING CELL PHONES WHILE DRIVING 0 100 50 40 60 30 70 20 80 10 90 TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE WHO RECOGNIZE PHONE USE INCREASES ACCIDENT RISK SOURCES: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Safety Council, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Governor’s Highway Safety Association, Financial Destination, Inc., Highway Loss Data Institute, Car and Driver , drivinglaws.org & distraction.gov. NO LAWS AGAINST TEXTING SECONDARY LAW FOR ALL DRIVERS Citations can only be dispersed if driver was pulled over for another offense. PRIMARY LAW FOR ALL DRIVERS Citations can be dispersed without any other offenses. PRIMARY LAW FOR BUS DRIVERS PRIMARY LAW FOR NOVICE DRIVERS Classified as those under the age of 18 or those with a learner’s permit (term varies from state to state). PRIMARY LAW FOR NOVICE & BUS DRIVERS A study conducted by the Highway Loss Data Institute discovered that accident rates in three out of four states increased after texting bans were put into effect. This discovery may be directly correlated to individuals ignoring the law and hiding their mobile devices. This choice to lower the phone further diverts attention away from the road. CHANGE IN ACCIDENT RATE AFTER TEXTING BAN X% WHAT IS DISTRACTED DRIVING? S TAT I S T I C S O N TEXTING WHILE DRIVING 3 types of distractions manual cognitive visual Texting is dangerous because it involves all 3 types of distractions Gretchen Chern & Adrian Watkins | DMGT 706 – Idea Visualization | Winter 2011 | Statistics last updated 03/12/2011..

Should States Ban Texting While Driving?

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This poster explores the dangers of texting while driving and examines current measures that are being taken to prevent texting while driving

Citation preview

Page 1: Should States Ban Texting While Driving?

0 100

5040 60

30 70

20 80

10 90

TOTAL PERCENTAGE OFACCIDENTS SPECIF ICALLY

DUE TO TEXTINGAT THE WHEEL

0 100

5040 60

30 70

20 80

10 90

TOTAL PERCENTAGE OFTEENAGERS WHO

ADMIT TO TEXTINGWHILE DRIVING

0 100

5040 60

30 70

20 80

10 90

TOTAL PERCENTAGE OFACCIDENTS CAUSED

BY DISTRACTEDDRIVING

SHOULD STATES BAN TEXTING WHILE DRIVING?So fa

r th is year

in the U.S. there

have been an

est imated

231 , 489

crashes

caused by

dr ivers us ing ce l l

phones and

text ing .

CURRENT LAWS AGAINSTTEXTING WHILE DRIVING

2008

+1%

2009

+12%

2010

2010

2010

2010

2010

2011 20092007

2006

2009

2009

2009

20092009

2009

2009

2011

2011

2009

2008

2005

2009

2009

2009

2008

20102010

2009

2010

2010

2011

2011

20092010

2010

2008

+9%

2008

+0%

BRAKING REACTION TIME AT 70 MPH

UNIMPAIRED

10 ft0 ft 20 ft 30 ft 40 ft 50 ft 60 ft 70 ft

LEGALLY DRUNK(add 4 feet)

10 ft0 ft 20 ft 30 ft 40 ft 50 ft 60 ft 70 ft

READING EMAIL(add 36 feet)

10 ft0 ft 20 ft 30 ft 40 ft 50 ft 60 ft 70 ft

SENDING A TEXT(add 70 feet)

10 ft0 ft 20 ft 30 ft 40 ft 50 ft 60 ft 70 ft

0 100

5040 60

30 70

20 80

10 90

TOTAL PERCENTAGE OFAMERICANS WHO ADMITTO USING CELL PHONES

WHILE DRIVING

0 100

5040 60

30 70

20 80

10 90

TOTAL PERCENTAGE OFPEOPLE WHO RECOGNIZEPHONE USE INCREASES

ACCIDENT RISK

SOURCES: U.S. Department of Transportat ion , Nat iona l Safety Counci l , Nat iona l H ighway Traff ic Safety Admin istrat ion , Governor’s H ighway Safety Assoc iat ion , F inanc ia l Dest inat ion , Inc . , H ighway Loss Data Inst itute , Car and Dr iver, dr iv ing laws.org & d istract ion .gov.

NO LAWSAGAINST TEXTING

SECONDARY LAW FOR ALL DRIVERSCitat ions can on ly be d ispersed i f dr iver was pu l ledover for another offense.

PRIMARY LAW FOR ALL DRIVERSCitat ions can be d ispersed without anyother offenses.

PRIMARY LAWFOR BUS DRIVERS

PRIMARY LAW FOR NOVICE DRIVERSClass i f ied as those under the age of 18 or those witha learner’s permit (term var ies from state to state) .

PRIMARY LAWFOR NOVICE & BUS DRIVERS

A study conducted by the Highway Loss Data Inst itute d iscovered that acc ident rates in three out of four states increased after text ing bans were put into effect . Th is d iscovery may be d irect ly corre lated to ind iv idua ls ignor ing the law and h id ing the ir mobi le dev ices . Th is cho ice to lower the phone further d iverts attent ion away from the road.

CHANGE IN ACCIDENT RATEAFTER TEXTING BAN

X%

WHAT ISDISTRACTED DRIVING?

STATISTICS ONTEXTING WHILE DRIVING

3types

ofd istract ions

manual

cogn it ive

v isua l

Text ing is dangerous becauseit invo lves a l l 3 types of d istract ions

Gretchen Chern & Adr ian Watk ins | DMGT 706 – Idea Visua l izat ion | Winter 2011 | Stat ist ics last updated 03/ 12/2011. .