22
Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants: Economic and Environmental Impacts 15 June 2011 Professor Paul Fischbeck Carnegie Mellon University [email protected] 412-268-3240 David Rode DAI Management Consultants, Inc. [email protected] 412-220-8920 1

Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants: Economic and Environmental Impacts

  • Upload
    howie

  • View
    79

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants: Economic and Environmental Impacts. 15 June 2011 Professor Paul Fischbeck Carnegie Mellon University [email protected] 412-268-3240 David Rode DAI Management Consultants, Inc. [email protected] 412-220-8920. Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants: Economic and Environmental Impacts

15 June 2011

Professor Paul FischbeckCarnegie Mellon University

[email protected]

David RodeDAI Management Consultants, Inc.

[email protected]

1

Page 2: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants• Since Fukushima, there has been discussion of the risks imposed by

nuclear power plants and several countries have taken steps to reduce use of nuclear power– Scheduled complete shutdowns of all reactors in Germany by 2022

and Switzerland by 2032– June 2011 Italian referendum curtails development

• Question: Given various criteria for shutting down nuclear plants, what would be the impact on environmental and economic metrics in the United States?– Individual plants– All plants exposed to natural risks (earthquakes, hurricanes, tornados)– Plants with specific characteristics (individual, age, manufacturer)– Characteristics of surrounding region (population, political support)

• Interactive spreadsheet to allow users to investigate various combinations of shutdown rules– Model and background information can be downloaded from: http

://www.cedm.epp.cmu.edu/tools.php2

Page 3: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

Reasons for Curtailing

Operations?

3http://theboldcorsicanflame.wordpress.com/2011/03/26/u-s-nuclear-reactor-power-plant-seismic-hazard-and-historical-earthquakes/

http://www.mapcruzin.com/nuclear-plants-risk-us/

http://www.emsei.psu.edu/hazards/hurr2.htm

Page 4: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

Method• All power generation facilities for each North American Electric Reliability

Council (NERC) region were modeled (total over 16,000 plants)– Historical capacity factor– Emissions rates– Variable costs (sorted)

• Nuclear plants were turned off based on risk/decision criteria• Lost production made up by increasing the output of non-nuclear power

plants with extra capacity in order of marginal cost (cheapest first)– Used NERC forced outage rates for coal and gas to determine available capacity– Assumed all production made up within each NERC region

• Calculated cost of generation with new mix of plants is a lower bound– Infinitely elastic (did not model change in cost caused by additional demand)– Does not include transmission and distribution costs– Pipeline capacity would be reached for some regions well before demand is met– For some scenarios, increase demand would send NG prices much higher

4

Page 5: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

The Model• All “yellow” cells are user selectable• Options for shutting down all plants or using a filter to select a subset of plants• Filter criteria

– Three levels of hurricane, earthquake, or tornado risks– Population of surrounding county– Age of reactor– Politics of state (Red or Blue) based on 2008 Presidential election

• Natural disaster risks are approximate based on various sources – Risk levels are designed to show general trends, not a detailed quantitative risk study

• Multiple criteria can be selected with either “and” or “or” logic– Shutdown plants that have both tornado and hurricane risk (few plants would pass filter)– Shutdown plants with either tornado or hurricane risk (many more plants would pass filter)

• National and regional metrics– Cost increase measured in $/MWh– Increase in emissions (NOx, SO2, and CO2) measured in millions of tons– Increase in coal consumption measured in millions of tons– Increase in additional natural gas consumption measured in millions of mmBTUs

• Regional analysis is done for one metric at a time and can be shown for amount of increase or percent change

• Number of replacement wind turbines estimated using 70 meter, 2.5 MW turbines operating at 25% capacity

5

Page 6: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

Interface

6

http://www.cedm.epp.cmu.edu/tools.php

Page 7: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

Shutdown Based on Natural Risks

7

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

Gen

erati

on L

ost

Add

ition

al C

ost

Add

ition

al S

O2

Add

ition

al N

Ox

Add

ition

al C

O2

Add

ition

al C

oal

Add

ition

al N

G

Perc

ent C

hang

e fr

om C

urre

nt

Tornado

Gen

erati

on L

ost

Add

ition

al C

ost

Add

ition

al S

O2

Add

ition

al N

Ox

Add

ition

al C

O2

Add

ition

al C

oal

Add

ition

al N

G

Hurricane

Gen

erati

on L

ost

Add

ition

al C

ost

Add

ition

al S

O2

Add

ition

al N

Ox

Add

ition

al C

O2

Add

ition

al C

oal

Add

ition

al N

G

EarthquakeLow, Moderate, or High Risk

Moderate or High Risk

Only High Risk

Impact on percentage change of national measures

Page 8: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

Shutdown Based on Demographics and

Plant Characteristics

Percentage change of national measures

8

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

Gen

erati

on L

ost

Add

ition

al C

ost

Add

ition

al S

O2

Add

ition

al N

Ox

Add

ition

al C

O2

Add

ition

al C

oal

Add

ition

al N

G

Perc

ent C

hang

e fr

om C

urre

nt

County Population

Over 100,000

Over 500,000

Over 1,000,000

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Gen

erati

on L

ost

Add

ition

al C

ost

Add

ition

al S

O2

Add

ition

al N

Ox

Add

ition

al C

O2

Add

ition

al C

oal

Add

ition

al N

G

Perc

ent C

hang

e fr

om C

urre

nt

Plant Age

Over 20 Years Old

Over 30 Years Old

Over 40 Years Old

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

Gen

erati

on L

ost

Add

ition

al C

ost

Add

ition

al S

O2

Add

ition

al N

Ox

Add

ition

al C

O2

Add

ition

al C

oal

Add

ition

al N

G

Perc

ent C

hang

e fr

om C

urre

nt

State Politics

Red States

Blue States

Page 9: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

Impact on US Generation and Costs

9

-

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Risk

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h Ri

sk

Onl

y H

igh

Risk

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h

Onl

y H

igh

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h

Onl

y H

igh

Ove

r 100

,000

Ove

r 500

,000

Ove

r 1,0

00,0

00

Ove

r 20

Year

s O

ld

Ove

r 30

Year

s O

ld

Ove

r 40

Year

s O

ld

Red

Stat

es

Blue

Sta

tes

Tornado Hurricane Earthquake County Population Reactor Age Politics

TWh

Generation Lost

-

1

2

3

4

5

6

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Risk

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h Ri

sk

Onl

y H

igh

Risk

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h

Onl

y H

igh

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h

Onl

y H

igh

Ove

r 100

,000

Ove

r 500

,000

Ove

r 1,0

00,0

00

Ove

r 20

Year

s O

ld

Ove

r 30

Year

s O

ld

Ove

r 40

Year

s O

ld

Red

Stat

es

Blue

Sta

tes

Tornado Hurricane Earthquake County Population Reactor Age Politics

$/M

Wh

Additional Cost

Page 10: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

Impact on US Emissions

10

-

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Risk

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h Ri

sk

Onl

y H

igh

Risk

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h

Onl

y H

igh

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h

Onl

y H

igh

Ove

r 100

,000

Ove

r 500

,000

Ove

r 1,0

00,0

00

Ove

r 20

Year

s O

ld

Ove

r 30

Year

s O

ld

Ove

r 40

Year

s O

ld

Red

Stat

es

Blue

Sta

tes

Tornado Hurricane Earthquake County Population Reactor Age Politics

Mill

ion

Tons

Additional SO2

-

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Risk

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h Ri

sk

Onl

y H

igh

Risk

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h

Onl

y H

igh

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h

Onl

y H

igh

Ove

r 100

,000

Ove

r 500

,000

Ove

r 1,0

00,0

00

Ove

r 20

Year

s O

ld

Ove

r 30

Year

s O

ld

Ove

r 40

Year

s O

ld

Red

Stat

es

Blue

Sta

tes

Tornado Hurricane Earthquake County Population Reactor Age Politics

Mill

ion

Ton

Additional NOx

-

100.0

200.0

300.0

400.0

500.0

600.0

700.0

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Risk

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h Ri

sk

Onl

y H

igh

Risk

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h

Onl

y H

igh

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h

Onl

y H

igh

Ove

r 100

,000

Ove

r 500

,000

Ove

r 1,0

00,0

00

Ove

r 20

Year

s O

ld

Ove

r 30

Year

s O

ld

Ove

r 40

Year

s O

ld

Red

Stat

es

Blue

Sta

tes

Tornado Hurricane Earthquake County Population Reactor Age Politics

Mill

ion

Tons

Additional CO2

Page 11: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

Impact on US Demand for Fuel Sources

11

-

50

100

150

200

250

300

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Risk

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h Ri

sk

Onl

y H

igh

Risk

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h

Onl

y H

igh

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h

Onl

y H

igh

Ove

r 100

,000

Ove

r 500

,000

Ove

r 1,0

00,0

00

Ove

r 20

Year

s O

ld

Ove

r 30

Year

s O

ld

Ove

r 40

Year

s O

ld

Red

Stat

es

Blue

Sta

tes

Tornado Hurricane Earthquake County Population Reactor Age Politics

Mill

ion

Tons

Additional Coal

-

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Risk

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h Ri

sk

Onl

y H

igh

Risk

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h

Onl

y H

igh

Low

, Mod

erat

e, o

r H

igh

Mod

erat

e or

Hig

h

Onl

y H

igh

Ove

r 100

,000

Ove

r 500

,000

Ove

r 1,0

00,0

00

Ove

r 20

Year

s O

ld

Ove

r 30

Year

s O

ld

Ove

r 40

Year

s O

ld

Red

Stat

es

Blue

Sta

tes

Tornado Hurricane Earthquake County Population Reactor Age Politics

Mill

ions

mm

BTU

Additional NG

Page 12: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

Shutting Down Individual Plants

• Regional impact of shutting down individual facilities– 104 reactors at 65 facilities– Shutdown all reactors at a single location

• Impact measures– Cost increase measured in $/MWh– Increase in emissions (NOx, SO2, and CO2) measured in

millions of tons– Increase in coal consumption measured in millions of tons

• Impacts determined at the NERC region level– National Electricity Reliability Council– 15 regions used (2 regions have no nuclear plants)

12

Page 13: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

13

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

4.50

5.00

Palo

Ver

de -

AZM

illst

-CT

Indi

an P

oint

-N

YDi

ablo

Can

yon

-CA

San

Ono

fre

-CA

Nin

e M

ile P

oint

-N

YSe

abro

ok -

NH

Brow

ns F

erry

-AL

Arka

nsas

-AR

Sout

h Te

xas -

TXCa

llaw

ay -

MO

Sequ

oyah

-TN

Vogt

le -

GA

Oco

nee

-SC

Com

anch

e Pe

ak -

TXCo

lum

bia

-WA

Clin

ton

-IL

Gra

nd G

ulf -

MS

Cata

wba

-SC

McG

uire

-N

CSt

. Luc

ie -

FLW

ater

ford

-LA

Edw

in I.

Hat

ch -

GA

Jose

ph M

. Far

ley -

ALJa

mes

A. F

itzPa

tric

k -N

YBr

unsw

ick -

NC

Pilg

rim -

MA

Nor

th A

nna

-VA

Rive

r Ben

d -L

ATu

rkey

Poi

nt -

FLW

olf C

reek

-KS

Verm

ont Y

anke

e -V

TSu

rry -

VAPr

airie

Isla

nd -

MN

Watt

s Bar

-TN

R.E.

Gin

na -

NY

Crys

tal R

iver

-FL

Coop

er -

NE

Virg

il C.

Sum

mer

-SC

Shea

ron

Har

ris -

NC

Duan

e Ar

nold

-IA

Mon

ticel

lo -

MN

Kew

aune

e -W

IBr

aidw

ood

-IL

H. B

. Rob

inso

n -S

CSa

lem

-N

JBy

ron

-Il

Susq

ueha

nna

-PA

Lim

eric

k -PA

LaSa

lle C

ount

y -I

LPe

ach

Bott

om -

PAFo

rt C

alho

un -

NE

Dona

ld C

. Coo

k -M

IBe

aver

Val

ley -

PACa

lver

t Cliff

s -M

DDr

esde

n -I

LQ

uad

Citie

s -IL

Perr

y -O

HFe

rmi -

MI

Hop

e Cr

eek

-NJ

Poin

t Bea

ch -

WI

Davi

s-Be

sse

-OH

Thre

e M

ile Is

land

-PA

Palis

ades

-M

IO

yste

r Cre

ek -

NJ

Additional Cost ($/MWh)

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

Palo

Ver

de -

AZM

illst

one

-CT

Colu

mbi

a -W

ADi

ablo

Can

yon

-CA

Brow

ns F

erry

-AL

San

Ono

fre

-CA

Seab

rook

-N

HSe

quoy

ah -

TNIn

dian

Poi

nt -

NY

Oco

nee

-SC

Vogt

le -

GA

Calla

way

-M

ON

ine

Mile

Poi

nt -

NY

Cata

wba

-SC

McG

uire

-N

CCl

into

n -I

LAr

kans

as -

ARBr

unsw

ick -

NC

Edw

in I.

Hat

ch -

GA

Nor

th A

nna

-VA

Jose

ph M

. Far

ley -

ALSu

rry -

VASo

uth

Texa

s -TX

Pilg

rim -

MA

Watt

s Bar

-TN

Gra

nd G

ulf -

MS

Com

anch

e Pe

ak -

TXPr

airie

Isla

nd -

MN

Verm

ont Y

anke

e -V

TW

ater

ford

-LA

Wol

f Cre

ek -

KSRi

ver B

end

-LA

Virg

il C.

Sum

mer

-SC

Coop

er -

NE

Shea

ron

Har

ris -

NC

Jam

es A

. Fitz

Patr

ick -

NY

H. B

. Rob

inso

n -S

CDu

ane

Arno

ld -

IASt

. Luc

ie -

FLM

ontic

ello

-M

NKe

wau

nee

-WI

Brai

dwoo

d -I

LSa

lem

-N

JBy

ron

-Il

Susq

ueha

nna

-PA

Fort

Cal

houn

-N

ELi

mer

ick -

PALa

Salle

Cou

nty

-IL

Peac

h Bo

ttom

-PA

Turk

ey P

oint

-FL

Dona

ld C

. Coo

k -M

IR.

E. G

inna

-N

YBe

aver

Val

ley -

PACa

lver

t Cliff

s -M

DDr

esde

n -I

LQ

uad

Citie

s -IL

Crys

tal R

iver

-FL

Perr

y -O

HFe

rmi -

MI

Hop

e Cr

eek

-NJ

Poin

t Bea

ch -

WI

Davi

s-Be

sse

-OH

Thre

e M

ile Is

land

-PA

Palis

ades

-M

IO

yste

r Cre

ek -

NJ

Additional Cost (% change)

Costs

Page 14: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

0.00

0.01

0.01

0.02

0.02

0.03

0.03

0.04

0.04

0.05

0.05

Brow

ns F

erry

-AL

Sequ

oyah

-TN

Brai

dwoo

d -I

LSa

lem

-N

JBy

ron

-Il

Susq

ueha

nna

-PA

Lim

eric

k -PA

LaSa

lle C

ount

y -I

LPe

ach

Bott

om -

PADo

nald

C. C

ook

-MI

Vogt

le -

GA

St. L

ucie

-FL

Palo

Ver

de -

AZAr

kans

as -

ARBe

aver

Val

ley -

PACa

lver

t Cliff

s -M

DDr

esde

n -I

LQ

uad

Citie

s -IL

Indi

an P

oint

-N

YN

ine

Mile

Poi

nt -

NY

Watt

s Bar

-TN

Turk

ey P

oint

-FL

Gra

nd G

ulf -

MS

Oco

nee

-SC

Edw

in I.

Hat

ch -

GA

Wat

erfo

rd -

LAJo

seph

M. F

arle

y -AL

Cata

wba

-SC

McG

uire

-N

CRi

ver B

end

-LA

Prai

rie Is

land

-M

NPe

rry

-OH

Brun

swic

k -N

CSo

uth

Texa

s -TX

Jam

es A

. Fitz

Patr

ick -

NY

Nor

th A

nna

-VA

Ferm

i -M

IW

olf C

reek

-KS

Com

anch

e Pe

ak -

TXH

ope

Cree

k -N

JCo

oper

-N

EPo

int B

each

-W

ISu

rry -

VADu

ane

Arno

ld -

IAM

ontic

ello

-M

NKe

wau

nee

-WI

Davi

s-Be

sse

-OH

Crys

tal R

iver

-FL

Fort

Cal

houn

-N

ETh

ree

Mile

Isla

nd -

PAPa

lisad

es -

MI

R.E.

Gin

na -

NY

Colu

mbi

a -W

AO

yste

r Cre

ek -

NJ

Calla

way

-M

OCl

into

n -I

LM

illst

one

-CT

Seab

rook

-N

HVi

rgil

C. S

umm

er -

SCSh

earo

n H

arris

-N

CPi

lgrim

-M

AVe

rmon

t Yan

kee

-VT

H. B

. Rob

inso

n -S

CDi

ablo

Can

yon

-CA

San

Ono

fre

-CA

Additional NOx (Millions of Tons)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Indi

an P

oint

-N

YN

ine

Mile

Poi

nt -

NY

Mill

ston

e -C

TSe

abro

ok -

NH

Arka

nsas

-AR

Colu

mbi

a -W

ABr

owns

Fer

ry -

ALG

rand

Gul

f -M

SPa

lo V

erde

-AZ

Jam

es A

. Fitz

Patr

ick -

NY

Pilg

rim -

MA

Wat

erfo

rd -

LAVe

rmon

t Yan

kee

-VT

Rive

r Ben

d -L

AR.

E. G

inna

-N

YSe

quoy

ah -

TNO

cone

e -S

CSt

. Luc

ie -

FLVo

gtle

-G

ACa

taw

ba -

SCM

cGui

re -

NC

Turk

ey P

oint

-FL

Brun

swic

k -N

CN

orth

Ann

a -V

ACa

llaw

ay -

MO

Diab

lo C

anyo

n -C

ASa

n O

nofr

e -C

ASu

rry -

VACl

into

n -I

LW

atts B

ar -

TNEd

win

I. H

atch

-G

AJo

seph

M. F

arle

y -AL

Sout

h Te

xas -

TXCo

man

che

Peak

-TX

Wol

f Cre

ek -

KSPr

airie

Isla

nd -

MN

Crys

tal R

iver

-FL

Coop

er -

NE

Duan

e Ar

nold

-IA

Mon

ticel

lo -

MN

Kew

aune

e -W

IFo

rt C

alho

un -

NE

Brai

dwoo

d -I

LSa

lem

-N

JBy

ron

-Il

Susq

ueha

nna

-PA

Virg

il C.

Sum

mer

-SC

Lim

eric

k -PA

LaSa

lle C

ount

y -I

LPe

ach

Bott

om -

PADo

nald

C. C

ook

-MI

Shea

ron

Har

ris -

NC

Beav

er V

alle

y -PA

Calv

ert C

liffs -

MD

Dres

den

-IL

Qua

d Ci

ties -

ILH

. B. R

obin

son

-SC

Perr

y -O

HFe

rmi -

MI

Hop

e Cr

eek

-NJ

Poin

t Bea

ch -

WI

Davi

s-Be

sse

-OH

Thre

e M

ile Is

land

-PA

Palis

ades

-M

IO

yste

r Cre

ek -

NJ

Additional NOx (% change)

NOx

14

Page 15: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

Vogt

le -

GA

Edw

in I.

Hat

ch -

GA

Jose

ph M

. Far

ley -

ALO

cone

e -S

CBr

aidw

ood

-IL

Sale

m -

NJ

Byro

n -I

lSu

sque

hann

a -P

ALi

mer

ick -

PALa

Salle

Cou

nty

-IL

Peac

h Bo

ttom

-PA

Brow

ns F

erry

-AL

Dona

ld C

. Coo

k -M

IBe

aver

Val

ley -

PACa

lver

t Cliff

s -M

DDr

esde

n -I

LQ

uad

Citie

s -IL

Cata

wba

-SC

McG

uire

-N

CBr

unsw

ick -

NC

Sequ

oyah

-TN

Nor

th A

nna

-VA

Sout

h Te

xas -

TXCo

man

che

Peak

-TX

Perr

y -O

HSu

rry -

VAIn

dian

Poi

nt -

NY

Nin

e M

ile P

oint

-N

YFe

rmi -

MI

Hop

e Cr

eek

-NJ

Poin

t Bea

ch -

WI

Davi

s-Be

sse

-OH

Thre

e M

ile Is

land

-PA

Palis

ades

-M

IO

yste

r Cre

ek -

NJ

Arka

nsas

-AR

Virg

il C.

Sum

mer

-SC

Shea

ron

Har

ris -

NC

St. L

ucie

-FL

H. B

. Rob

inso

n -S

CTu

rkey

Poi

nt -

FLM

illst

one

-CT

Seab

rook

-N

HJa

mes

A. F

itzPa

tric

k -N

YW

atts B

ar -

TNW

olf C

reek

-KS

Gra

nd G

ulf -

MS

Wat

erfo

rd -

LACa

llaw

ay -

MO

Prai

rie Is

land

-M

NPi

lgrim

-M

ARi

ver B

end

-LA

Clin

ton

-IL

R.E.

Gin

na -

NY

Coop

er -

NE

Verm

ont Y

anke

e -V

TPa

lo V

erde

-AZ

Duan

e Ar

nold

-IA

Mon

ticel

lo -

MN

Kew

aune

e -W

IFo

rt C

alho

un -

NE

Crys

tal R

iver

-FL

Colu

mbi

a -W

ADi

ablo

Can

yon

-CA

San

Ono

fre

-CA

Additional SO2 (Millions of Tons)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Mill

ston

e -C

TSe

abro

ok -

NH

Arka

nsas

-AR

Indi

an P

oint

-N

YN

ine

Mile

Poi

nt -

NY

Pilg

rim -

MA

Gra

nd G

ulf -

MS

Wat

erfo

rd -

LAVe

rmon

t Yan

kee

-VT

Jam

es A

. Fitz

Patr

ick -

NY

Rive

r Ben

d -L

APa

lo V

erde

-AZ

Colu

mbi

a -W

ASo

uth

Texa

s -TX

Com

anch

e Pe

ak -

TXVo

gtle

-G

ABr

owns

Fer

ry -

ALR.

E. G

inna

-N

YSt

. Luc

ie -

FLEd

win

I. H

atch

-G

AJo

seph

M. F

arle

y -AL

Sequ

oyah

-TN

Oco

nee

-SC

Turk

ey P

oint

-FL

Cata

wba

-SC

McG

uire

-N

CBr

unsw

ick -

NC

Nor

th A

nna

-VA

Wol

f Cre

ek -

KSCa

llaw

ay -

MO

Surr

y -VA

Diab

lo C

anyo

n -C

ASa

n O

nofr

e -C

ACl

into

n -I

LVi

rgil

C. S

umm

er -

SCW

atts B

ar -

TNSh

earo

n H

arris

-N

CH

. B. R

obin

son

-SC

Prai

rie Is

land

-M

NCr

ysta

l Riv

er -

FLCo

oper

-N

EBr

aidw

ood

-IL

Sale

m -

NJ

Byro

n -I

lSu

sque

hann

a -P

ALi

mer

ick -

PALa

Salle

Cou

nty

-IL

Peac

h Bo

ttom

-PA

Dona

ld C

. Coo

k -M

IDu

ane

Arno

ld -

IAM

ontic

ello

-M

NKe

wau

nee

-WI

Beav

er V

alle

y -PA

Calv

ert C

liffs -

MD

Dres

den

-IL

Qua

d Ci

ties -

ILFo

rt C

alho

un -

NE

Perr

y -O

HFe

rmi -

MI

Hop

e Cr

eek

-NJ

Poin

t Bea

ch -

WI

Davi

s-Be

sse

-OH

Thre

e M

ile Is

land

-PA

Palis

ades

-M

IO

yste

r Cre

ek -

NJ

Additional SO2 (% change)

SO2

15

Page 16: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

Brow

ns F

erry

-AL

Oco

nee

-SC

Sout

h Te

xas -

TXBr

aidw

ood

-IL

Com

anch

e Pe

ak -

TXSa

lem

-N

JPa

lo V

erde

-AZ

Byro

n -I

lSu

sque

hann

a -P

ACa

taw

ba -

SCLi

mer

ick -

PAVo

gtle

-G

ALa

Salle

Cou

nty

-IL

Peac

h Bo

ttom

-PA

McG

uire

-N

CSe

quoy

ah -

TNDo

nald

C. C

ook

-MI

Arka

nsas

-AR

Brun

swic

k -N

CN

orth

Ann

a -V

AEd

win

I. H

atch

-G

ABe

aver

Val

ley -

PACa

lver

t Cliff

s -M

DDr

esde

n -I

LQ

uad

Citie

s -IL

Jose

ph M

. Far

ley -

ALIn

dian

Poi

nt -

NY

Nin

e M

ile P

oint

-N

YSu

rry -

VASt

. Luc

ie -

FLM

illst

one

-CT

Gra

nd G

ulf -

MS

Perr

y -O

HTu

rkey

Poi

nt -

FLCa

llaw

ay -

MO

Wol

f Cre

ek -

KSW

ater

ford

-LA

Ferm

i -M

ICl

into

n -I

LDi

ablo

Can

yon

-CA

Hop

e Cr

eek

-NJ

Prai

rie Is

land

-M

NSe

abro

ok -

NH

San

Ono

fre

-CA

Poin

t Bea

ch -

WI

Watt

s Bar

-TN

Rive

r Ben

d -L

AVi

rgil

C. S

umm

er -

SCJa

mes

A. F

itzPa

tric

k -N

YSh

earo

n H

arris

-N

CDa

vis-

Bess

e -O

HCo

lum

bia

-WA

Thre

e M

ile Is

land

-PA

Palis

ades

-M

ICr

ysta

l Riv

er -

FLCo

oper

-N

EH

. B. R

obin

son

-SC

Pilg

rim -

MA

Verm

ont Y

anke

e -V

TO

yste

r Cre

ek -

NJ

Duan

e Ar

nold

-IA

Mon

ticel

lo -

MN

R.E.

Gin

na -

NY

Kew

aune

e -W

IFo

rt C

alho

un -

NE

Additional CO2 (Millions of Tons)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Mill

ston

e -C

TSe

abro

ok -

NH

Indi

an P

oint

-N

YN

ine

Mile

Poi

nt -

NY

Palo

Ver

de -

AZAr

kans

as -

ARPi

lgrim

-M

ACo

lum

bia

-WA

Brow

ns F

erry

-AL

Verm

ont Y

anke

e -V

TJa

mes

A. F

itzPa

tric

k -N

YO

cone

e -S

CDi

ablo

Can

yon

-CA

San

Ono

fre

-CA

Gra

nd G

ulf -

MS

Cata

wba

-SC

McG

uire

-N

CW

ater

ford

-LA

Vogt

le -

GA

Sequ

oyah

-TN

Brun

swic

k -N

CSt

. Luc

ie -

FLN

orth

Ann

a -V

ASo

uth

Texa

s -TX

Rive

r Ben

d -L

ACa

llaw

ay -

MO

Com

anch

e Pe

ak -

TXSu

rry -

VAEd

win

I. H

atch

-G

AJo

seph

M. F

arle

y -AL

Clin

ton

-IL

Turk

ey P

oint

-FL

R.E.

Gin

na -

NY

Wol

f Cre

ek -

KSPr

airie

Isla

nd -

MN

Watt

s Bar

-TN

Virg

il C.

Sum

mer

-SC

Crys

tal R

iver

-FL

Shea

ron

Har

ris -

NC

H. B

. Rob

inso

n -S

CCo

oper

-N

EBr

aidw

ood

-IL

Duan

e Ar

nold

-IA

Sale

m -

NJ

Byro

n -I

lM

ontic

ello

-M

NSu

sque

hann

a -P

ALi

mer

ick -

PALa

Salle

Cou

nty

-IL

Kew

aune

e -W

IPe

ach

Bott

om -

PADo

nald

C. C

ook

-MI

Fort

Cal

houn

-N

EBe

aver

Val

ley -

PACa

lver

t Cliff

s -M

DDr

esde

n -I

LQ

uad

Citie

s -IL

Perr

y -O

HFe

rmi -

MI

Hop

e Cr

eek

-NJ

Poin

t Bea

ch -

WI

Davi

s-Be

sse

-OH

Thre

e M

ile Is

land

-PA

Palis

ades

-M

IO

yste

r Cre

ek -

NJ

Additional CO2 (% change)

CO2

16

Page 17: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

Brow

ns F

erry

-AL

Oco

nee

-SC

Brai

dwoo

d -I

LSa

lem

-N

JBy

ron

-Il

Susq

ueha

nna

-PA

Cata

wba

-SC

Lim

eric

k -PA

Vogt

le -

GA

LaSa

lle C

ount

y -I

LPe

ach

Bott

om -

PAM

cGui

re -

NC

Com

anch

e Pe

ak -

TXSo

uth

Texa

s -TX

Dona

ld C

. Coo

k -M

ISe

quoy

ah -

TNBr

unsw

ick -

NC

Arka

nsas

-AR

Nor

th A

nna

-VA

Edw

in I.

Hat

ch -

GA

Beav

er V

alle

y -PA

Calv

ert C

liffs -

MD

Dres

den

-IL

Qua

d Ci

ties -

ILJo

seph

M. F

arle

y -AL

Surr

y -VA

St. L

ucie

-FL

Palo

Ver

de -

AZIn

dian

Poi

nt -

NY

Nin

e M

ile P

oint

-N

YG

rand

Gul

f -M

SPe

rry

-OH

Turk

ey P

oint

-FL

Calla

way

-M

OW

olf C

reek

-KS

Wat

erfo

rd -

LAFe

rmi -

MI

Hop

e Cr

eek

-NJ

Clin

ton

-IL

Poin

t Bea

ch -

WI

Prai

rie Is

land

-M

NW

atts B

ar -

TNRi

ver B

end

-LA

Virg

il C.

Sum

mer

-SC

Jam

es A

. Fitz

Patr

ick -

NY

Mill

ston

e -C

TSe

abro

ok -

NH

Shea

ron

Har

ris -

NC

Davi

s-Be

sse

-OH

Thre

e M

ile Is

land

-PA

Palis

ades

-M

ICr

ysta

l Riv

er -

FLH

. B. R

obin

son

-SC

Coop

er -

NE

Pilg

rim -

MA

Colu

mbi

a -W

AO

yste

r Cre

ek -

NJ

Verm

ont Y

anke

e -V

TDu

ane

Arno

ld -

IAR.

E. G

inna

-N

YM

ontic

ello

-M

NKe

wau

nee

-WI

Fort

Cal

houn

-N

EDi

ablo

Can

yon

-CA

San

Ono

fre

-CA

Additional Coal (Millions of Tons)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Indi

an P

oint

-N

YN

ine

Mile

Poi

nt -

NY

Mill

ston

e -C

TSe

abro

ok -

NH

Jam

es A

. Fitz

Patr

ick -

NY

Arka

nsas

-AR

Pilg

rim -

MA

Verm

ont Y

anke

e -V

TG

rand

Gul

f -M

SW

ater

ford

-LA

St. L

ucie

-FL

R.E.

Gin

na -

NY

Rive

r Ben

d -L

ATu

rkey

Poi

nt -

FLPa

lo V

erde

-AZ

Colu

mbi

a -W

ABr

owns

Fer

ry -

ALCo

man

che

Peak

-TX

Sout

h Te

xas -

TXO

cone

e -S

CCa

taw

ba -

SCM

cGui

re -

NC

Vogt

le -

GA

Brun

swic

k -N

CSe

quoy

ah -

TNCr

ysta

l Riv

er -

FLN

orth

Ann

a -V

ADi

ablo

Can

yon

-CA

San

Ono

fre

-CA

Calla

way

-M

OSu

rry -

VAEd

win

I. H

atch

-G

AJo

seph

M. F

arle

y -AL

Clin

ton

-IL

Wol

f Cre

ek -

KSPr

airie

Isla

nd -

MN

Virg

il C.

Sum

mer

-SC

Watt

s Bar

-TN

Shea

ron

Har

ris -

NC

H. B

. Rob

inso

n -S

CCo

oper

-N

EBr

aidw

ood

-IL

Sale

m -

NJ

Byro

n -I

lSu

sque

hann

a -P

ALi

mer

ick -

PALa

Salle

Cou

nty

-IL

Duan

e Ar

nold

-IA

Peac

h Bo

ttom

-PA

Mon

ticel

lo -

MN

Kew

aune

e -W

IDo

nald

C. C

ook

-MI

Fort

Cal

houn

-N

EBe

aver

Val

ley -

PACa

lver

t Cliff

s -M

DDr

esde

n -I

LQ

uad

Citie

s -IL

Perr

y -O

HFe

rmi -

MI

Hop

e Cr

eek

-NJ

Poin

t Bea

ch -

WI

Davi

s-Be

sse

-OH

Thre

e M

ile Is

land

-PA

Palis

ades

-M

IO

yste

r Cre

ek -

NJ

Additional Coal (% change)

Coal

17

Page 18: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

120.00

140.00

Diab

lo C

anyo

n -C

ASa

n O

nofr

e -C

APa

lo V

erde

-AZ

Mill

ston

e -C

TIn

dian

Poi

nt -

NY

Nin

e M

ile P

oint

-N

YSo

uth

Texa

s -TX

Colu

mbi

a -W

ASe

abro

ok -

NH

Com

anch

e Pe

ak -

TXAr

kans

as -

ARBe

aver

Val

ley -

PABr

aidw

ood

-IL

Brow

ns F

erry

-AL

Brun

swic

k -N

CBy

ron

-Il

Calla

way

-M

OCa

lver

t Cliff

s -M

DCa

taw

ba -

SCCl

into

n -I

LCo

oper

-N

ECr

ysta

l Riv

er -

FLDa

vis-

Bess

e -O

HDo

nald

C. C

ook

-MI

Dres

den

-IL

Duan

e Ar

nold

-IA

Edw

in I.

Hat

ch -

GA

Ferm

i -M

IFo

rt C

alho

un -

NE

Gra

nd G

ulf -

MS

H. B

. Rob

inso

n -S

CH

ope

Cree

k -N

JJa

mes

A. F

itzPa

tric

k -N

YJo

seph

M. F

arle

y -AL

Kew

aune

e -W

ILa

Salle

Cou

nty

-IL

Lim

eric

k -PA

McG

uire

-N

CM

ontic

ello

-M

NN

orth

Ann

a -V

AO

cone

e -S

CO

yste

r Cre

ek -

NJ

Palis

ades

-M

IPe

ach

Bott

om -

PAPe

rry

-OH

Pilg

rim -

MA

Poin

t Bea

ch -

WI

Prai

rie Is

land

-M

NQ

uad

Citie

s -IL

R.E.

Gin

na -

NY

Rive

r Ben

d -L

ASa

lem

-N

JSe

quoy

ah -

TNSh

earo

n H

arris

-N

CSt

. Luc

ie -

FLSu

rry -

VASu

sque

hann

a -P

ATh

ree

Mile

Isla

nd -

PATu

rkey

Poi

nt -

FLVe

rmon

t Yan

kee

-VT

Virg

il C.

Sum

mer

-SC

Vogt

le -

GA

Wat

erfo

rd -

LAW

atts B

ar -

TNW

olf C

reek

-KS

Additional Natural Gas (Millions of mmBTU)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Mill

ston

e -C

TPa

lo V

erde

-AZ

Colu

mbi

a -W

AIn

dian

Poi

nt -

NY

Diab

lo C

anyo

n -C

ASa

n O

nofr

e -C

AN

ine

Mile

Poi

nt -

NY

Seab

rook

-N

HSo

uth

Texa

s -TX

Com

anch

e Pe

ak -

TXAr

kans

as -

ARBe

aver

Val

ley -

PABr

aidw

ood

-IL

Brow

ns F

erry

-AL

Brun

swic

k -N

CBy

ron

-Il

Calla

way

-M

OCa

lver

t Cliff

s -M

DCa

taw

ba -

SCCl

into

n -I

LCo

oper

-N

ECr

ysta

l Riv

er -

FLDa

vis-

Bess

e -O

HDo

nald

C. C

ook

-MI

Dres

den

-IL

Duan

e Ar

nold

-IA

Edw

in I.

Hat

ch -

GA

Ferm

i -M

IFo

rt C

alho

un -

NE

Gra

nd G

ulf -

MS

H. B

. Rob

inso

n -S

CH

ope

Cree

k -N

JJa

mes

A. F

itzPa

tric

k -N

YJo

seph

M. F

arle

y -AL

Kew

aune

e -W

ILa

Salle

Cou

nty

-IL

Lim

eric

k -PA

McG

uire

-N

CM

ontic

ello

-M

NN

orth

Ann

a -V

AO

cone

e -S

CO

yste

r Cre

ek -

NJ

Palis

ades

-M

IPe

ach

Bott

om -

PAPe

rry

-OH

Pilg

rim -

MA

Poin

t Bea

ch -

WI

Prai

rie Is

land

-M

NQ

uad

Citie

s -IL

R.E.

Gin

na -

NY

Rive

r Ben

d -L

ASa

lem

-N

JSe

quoy

ah -

TNSh

earo

n H

arris

-N

CSt

. Luc

ie -

FLSu

rry -

VASu

sque

hann

a -P

ATh

ree

Mile

Isla

nd -

PATu

rkey

Poi

nt -

FLVe

rmon

t Yan

kee

-VT

Virg

il C.

Sum

mer

-SC

Vogt

le -

GA

Wat

erfo

rd -

LAW

atts B

ar -

TNW

olf C

reek

-KS

Additional Natural Gas (% change)

Gas

18

Page 19: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

Relationship between

Regional Impacts

Change in Additional Coal and Costs

19

Arkansas - AR

Braidwood - IL

Browns Ferry - AL

Brunswick - NC

Callaway - MO

Catawba - SC

Columbia - WA

Diablo Canyon - CA

Indian Point - NY

McGuire - NC

Millstone - CT

Nine Mile Point - NY

Oconee - SC

Oyster Creek - NJ

Palo Verde - AZ

Pilgrim - MA

San Onofre - CA

Seabrook - NH

South Texas - TX

Surry - VA

Vogtle - GA

$0.00

$0.50

$1.00

$1.50

$2.00

$2.50

$3.00

$3.50

$4.00

$4.50

$5.00

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Add

ition

al C

ost

($/M

Wh)

Additional Coal (million tons)

Page 20: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

20

Relationship between

Regional Impacts

Percentage Change in Generation Costs and CO2

Arkansas - AR

Browns Ferry - AL

Callaway - MO

Columbia - WA

Diablo Canyon - CAGrand Gulf - MS

Indian Point - NY

Joseph M. Farley - AL

Millstone - CT

Nine Mile Point - NY

Oconee - SC

Oyster Creek - NJ

Palo Verde - AZ

Pilgrim - MA

San Onofre - CA

Seabrook - NH

Sequoyah - TN

Vermont Yankee - VT

Vogtle - GA

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20%

Perc

ent C

hang

e in

CO

2 Em

issi

ons

Percent Change in Regional Cost

Page 21: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

Relationship between

Regional Impacts

Percentage Change in SO2 and NOx

21

Arkansas - AR

Browns Ferry - AL

Catawba - SC

Columbia - WA

Comanche Peak - TX

Grand Gulf - MS

Indian Point - NY

McGuire - NC

Millstone - CT

Nine Mile Point - NY

Oconee - SC

Oyster Creek - NJ

Palo Verde - AZPilgrim - MA

R.E. Ginna - NY

River Bend - LA

Seabrook - NH

Sequoyah - TN

South Texas - TX

Turkey Point - FL

Vermont Yankee - VT

Vogtle - GA

Waterford - LA

Wolf Creek - KS

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%

Perc

ent C

hang

e in

NO

x Em

issi

ons

Percent Change in SO2

Page 22: Shutting Down Nuclear Power Plants:  Economic and Environmental Impacts

Conclusions

• Nuclear power plants are a major source of electricity generation in the US

• Shutdown of plants could lead to large increases in multiple outcome measures both at the regional and national scale

• Significant unintended negative consequences could result from nuclear plant shutdowns for well-intentioned risk-reduction reasons if careful long-term planning is not done

22