32
SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization) Partha Bhaduri (VECC) Arun Prakash(BHU)

SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

  • Upload
    gema

  • View
    66

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization). Partha Bhaduri (VECC) Arun Prakash(BHU). Motivation Physics performance analysis for SIS-100. Determine a “standard” version of Much for SIS-100 . Look for an optimized version of Much for SIS-100. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

SIS100 simulation(Geometry optimization)

Partha Bhaduri (VECC)Arun Prakash(BHU)

Page 2: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Motivation

Physics performance analysis for SIS-100.

Determine a “standard” version of Much for SIS-100.

Look for an optimized version of Much for SIS-100.

This optimized version will be used for subsequent physics analysis.

Page 3: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

• Optimization should be done with low mass vector mesons

(lmvms) and J/ψ at SIS100 energy.

• We have chosen central Au+Au events at 8 AGeV and pAu

collisions @ 30 GeV .

• Use the same set-up for in simulation for J/ψ & LMVM. For

LMVM use information from stations just before the last thick

absorber.

• Run full simulation & obtain signal reconstruction efficiency &

S/B ratio.

Page 4: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

– We have to decide upon :– Total number of stations(layers)– Total absorber thickness, total no. of absorbers & the

absorber material– Number of stations (2/3) in between two absorbers– Distance between stations & absorber to station distance

– Present constraints :– Absorber material (Fe, Pb, W )– Layer to layer distance >= 10 cm.– Layer to absorber distance >= 5cm.

Page 5: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)
Page 6: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Geometry (Dec 2009), LMVM setup)

Transport:1000 UrQMD mbias @8A.GeV+1000 OmegaGeometry: Compact +Modular+32cmX32cm GEMsts_same_z.geopipe_much.geoshied_standard.geocave.geotarget_au_250mu.geomagnet_standard.geo

Page 7: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Station radii

R_max+20cm R_max+0.6cm

Station-1Station-1

R=70cm

Decided to remain within nominal outer radius at each station (no extra radii), adds pad

multiplicity artificially

Page 8: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Particle density

The kink ???

Page 9: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Segmentation : First attempt, guided by particle density

Item Pads

No of regions

2 2 2 1 1

No of Channels

256 256 256 256 256 ~636k

V1 R int 32 50 70 - -

Lx 0.5 0.5 1.0 - -

Ly 0.5 0.5 1.0 - -

Rout 70 96 120 150 182.5

Lx 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

Ly 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

Av. Hit loss ~ 1.5%

Page 10: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Item Pads

No of regions

1 1 1 1 1

No of Channels

256 256 256 256 256 ~430k

V2 R int - - - - -

Lx - - - - -

Ly - - - - -

Rout 70 96 120 150 182.5

Lx 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

Ly 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

How bad can it be ?

Av hit loss ~4.8%

Page 11: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Item Pads

No of regions

1 1 1 1 1

No of Channels

256 256 256 256 256 ~120k

V3 R int - - - - -

Lx - - - - -

Ly - - - - -

Rout 70 96 120 150 182.5

Lx 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

Ly 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0

Can we worsen it further ?

Av hit loss ~ 14.8%

Page 12: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Item Pads

No of regions

2 2 1 1 1

No of Channels

256 256 256 256 256 ~528k

V4 R int 25 40 - - -

Lx 0.5 0.5 - - -

Ly 0.5 0.5 - - -

Rout 70 96 120 150 182.5

Lx 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

Ly 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

Next stage : fine tuning

Av. Hit loss ~2.20%

Page 13: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

segmentation station-1 station-2 station-3

station-4station-5

pads~528k

Page 14: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Hits Simple Gem

Page 15: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Hits Advanced GEM

Occupancy increases inadvanced GEM by factor of~3compared to Simple GEM.CONSEQUENCES FOR DETECTOR FABRICATION

Page 16: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

SIS -100 Geometry : version 1To start with we have used a geometry with total 9 stations with (3+3+3) configuration. Effective no. of stations for lmvm is thus 6.

Total abs. thickness:

lmvm : 100 cm. (30 +70)

J/Psi : 225 cm. (30+70+125)

Specification of distances :

layer to layer : 10 cm.

abs. to layer : 0 cm.

layer to absorber : 10 cm.

Extra Radius (change in CbmMuchGeoscheme class) :

station : 0 cm.

absorber : 100 cm.( to keep stations inside absorber)

Page 17: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)
Page 18: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Simulation (AA) Transport : Central Au+Au @ 8A GeV

Signal : Pluto (ω→μμ) Background : UrQMD Events : 10k

Reconstruction : Segmentation scheme : Manual segmentation

Station 1 (layers 1, 2, 3) : 2 regions (pad size in the central region : 0.2 – 0.6 cm.)

Station 2 (layers 4, 5, 6) : one region with pad size 3.2 cm * 3.2 cm.

Station 3 (layers 7, 8, 9) : one region with pad size 5 cm.*5 cm.

Implementation of detector in-efficiency at hit producer level. Simple Hit producer w/o clustering

Page 19: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Eta distribution @ station 1

Signal muons Primary Bkg.

Input tracks

Primary tracks hitting station 1

Midrapidity not covered??

Page 20: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Momentum distribution @ station 1

Signal muons Primary Bkg.

Input tracks

Primary tracks hitting station 1

Page 21: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Azimuth distribution @ station 1

Signal muons Primary Bkg.

Input tracks

Primary tracks hitting station 1

Page 22: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Acceptance of primaries @ station 1

Input tracks

Primary tracks hitting station 1

Signal muons Primary Bkg.

Page 23: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Implementation of detector in-efficiency

No loss

10% hit loss

Page 24: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

No hit loss

No hit loss

5% hit loss

5% hit loss

Effect of hit loss on reconstructed tracks

Global tracks

Much tracks

Page 25: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Signal Tracks

Background tracks

Distribution of chi2vertex

Page 26: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Invariant mass spectrum (ω→μμ )

Cuts :1. No. of Muchhits>=42. No. of STS Hits >=43. chi2primary < 3

Super event (SE) analysis for bkg (combine all the positive tracks with all the negative tracks over all the events excluding only tracks from same event). Gaussian fit to signalPolynomial (pol 8) fit to bkg.

10k central embedded events for Au + Au @ 8

GeV/n

Page 27: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Pad size (centre of station #1 )

Total Pads Reconstruction efficiency (%)

S/B

3 mm. 523332 1.74 0.0027

4 mm. 309384 1.77 0.0027

5 mm. 227556 1.64 0.0029

6 mm. 167904 1.64 0.0030

Results for various pad size (ω→μμ )

Page 28: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Invariant mass spectra (I/Psi)

Super event (SE) analysis for bkg (combine all the positive tracks with all the negative tracks over all the events excluding only the tracks from the same event). One signal event in 10^7/BR bkg events Gaussian fit to signalPolynomial (pol 7) fit to bkg.

Cuts :No. of Muchhits >= 7No. of STS Hits >= 4Chi2primary < 3

Reconstruction efficiency : 5.1 %

S/B : 18.9

Page 29: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

pA: Acceptance of reconstructed pairs

Background Signal

Conditions : 70% true hits

4 STS hits + 7 MUCH layers Same geometry as AA

5mm pad size at the inner region

of station 1

Page 30: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Polynomial of order 8 fitting to background

Reco. eff. 20.2 %

S/B : 127

pA: 30 GeV

Conditions : 70% true hits

4 STS hits + 7 MUCH layers

Work in progress

w/o 70% criterion

Page 31: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

SUMMARY:

First step of optimization done for SIS10 MUCH

Comparisons will be made with other geometry options

(absorber/no of stations)

Clustering will be added. (should not have large effect as

GEM cluster size ~100 micron)

Minimum pad size of 4 mm seems reasonable and we plan to

build one test chamber with these.

pA results needs to be updated.

Page 32: SIS100 simulation (Geometry optimization)

Study of J/Psi (AuAu)

Cuts :1.No. of Muchhits>=72. No. of STS Hits >=43.Chi2primary <3

Run the full simulation chain for J/Psi with 4mm. pad size

10k central Au+Au embedded events @ 8 GeV/n

Only bkg. Track (UrQMD generated)

from different events for SE

All tracks (uncorrelated signal muons+ bkg. Tracks) from

different events for SE