37
3 October 2005 27 th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 1 Some developments at ECMWF during 2005 Mariano Hortal ECMWF

Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

  • Upload
    saad

  • View
    48

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Some developments at ECMWF during 2005. Mariano Hortal ECMWF. Overview. New PBL scheme Wavelet J b in 4D-Var T L 799L91 in preoperational mode T L 2047. Is there any skill in cloud forecasts?. ECMWF PBL parameterization (- 2004) (similar at NCAR, NCEP, Arpege, DWD,…). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 1

Some developments at ECMWFduring 2005

Mariano Hortal

ECMWF

Page 2: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 2

Overview

• New PBL scheme

• Wavelet Jb in 4D-Var

• TL799L91 in preoperational mode

• TL2047

Page 3: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 3

Is there any skill in cloud forecasts?

( )1

( )

RMSE forecastSKILL

RMSE persistence

Page 4: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 4

ECMWF PBL parameterization (- 2004)(similar at NCAR, NCEP, Arpege, DWD,…)

moist mass-flux convection

dry K diffusion PBL

Page 5: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 5

PBL cloud unification – an MK approachMartin Köhler, ECMWF

key ingredients:

• moist conserved variables

• combined Mass-flux/K-diffusion solver

• cloud variability

• transition between stratocumulus and shallow convection

Page 6: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 6

A statistical mass flux framework for organized updrafts

PDF of {w, qt ,ql }

Mass flux

Top % of updrafts that are explicitly modelled

K diffusion

{w, qt ,ql }

Page 7: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 7

improved marine stratocumulus (MK PBL-old)

T511 time=10d

n=140

old: CY28R4 new MK PBL

Page 8: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 8

Peruvian stratocumulus: model column vs EPIC observations

Page 9: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 9

European Stratus in December 2004

Page 10: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 10

Wavelet Jb

• Wavelet Jb defines the analysis’ “change-of-variable” and the background cost function as:

– Index j denotes “scale” (wavenumber band).

– The functions Ψj are localized spatially, and in wavenumber.

– The Vj are block-diagonal, with vertical covariance matrix blocks, and one block per gridpoint.

• Convolution with Ψj limits the influence of Vj to a band of wavenumbers and to nearby gridpoints.

• The result is a covariance model that allows both spatial and spectral variation of covariances.

T

1 1

1and

2

K K

b j j j b j jj j

J

x x Ψ V χ χ χ

Page 11: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 11

Wavelet Jb – 2D Example

• As an example, we illustrate a 2D covariance model on the sphere: approximately-Gaussian structure functions with spatially-varying length scale (300km – 1300km).

• The rows of the covariance matrix can be shown by plotting Bx, with x a set of delta functions.

• For the wavelet Jb covariance model, we have:

2j j j

j

Bx Ψ Ψ x

Page 12: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 12

Wavelet Jb – 2D Example

• The prescribed length scales are:

1299998.1299996.

300000. 300007.

80°S80°S

70°S 70°S

60°S60°S

50°S 50°S

40°S40°S

30°S 30°S

20°S20°S

10°S 10°S

0°0°

10°N 10°N

20°N20°N

30°N 30°N

40°N40°N

50°N 50°N

60°N60°N

70°N 70°N

80°N80°N

160°W

160°W 140°W

140°W 120°W

120°W 100°W

100°W 80°W

80°W 60°W

60°W 40°W

40°W 20°W

20°W 0°

0° 20°E

20°E 40°E

40°E 60°E

60°E 80°E

80°E 100°E

100°E 120°E

120°E 140°E

140°E 160°E

160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa specific humidity

300000

400000

500000

600000

700000

800000

900000

Page 13: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 13

Wavelet Jb:

Ψ̂ j

0 .0 00 03 4

0 .0 00 03 4

0 .0 00 03 5

0 .0 00 03 5

0 .0 00 03 5

0 .0 00 03 5

0 .0 00 03 5

0 .0 00 03 5

0 .0 00 03 5

0 .0 00 03 5

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa specific humidity

-0.3 10- 5

-0.2 10- 5

-0.2 10 - 5

-0.2 10 - 5

-0.1 10- 5

-0.8 10- 6

-0.4 10- 6

0.4 10- 6

0.4 10- 6

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa specific humidity

-0 .0 0 0 1

-0 .0 0 0 1

-0 .0 0 0 0 8

-0 .0 0 0 0 8

-0 .0 00 06

-0 .0 00 06

-0 .0 00 04

-0 .0 00 04

-0 .0 00 02

-0 .0 00 02

0 .0 00 02 0 .0 00 02 0 .0 00 02 0 .0 00 02

0.0

0004

0.0

0004

0.0

0004

0.0

0004

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa specific humidity

80

°S

80

°S

60

°S

60

°S

40

°S

40

°S

20

°S

20

°S

0°0°

20

°N

20

°N

40

°N

40

°N

60

°N

60

°N

80

°N

80

°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa specific humidity

80

°S

80

°S

60

°S

60

°S

40

°S

40

°S

20

°S

20

°S

0°0°

20

°N

20

°N

40

°N

40

°N

60

°N

60

°N

80

°N

80

°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa specific humidity

80

°S

80

°S

60

°S

60

°S

40

°S

40

°S

20

°S

20

°S

0°0°

20

°N

20

°N

40

°N

40

°N

60

°N

60

°N

80

°N

80

°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa specific humidity

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa specific humidity

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa specific humidity

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa specific humidity

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa specific humidity

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

Where x is a set of delta functions

j x

2j j j

j

Bx Ψ Ψ x

Page 14: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 14

Wavelet Jb

Scale with σj2

at each gridpoint, and for each scale.

0 .0 250 .0 25

0 .0 5

0 .0 5

0 .0 75 0 .0 75

0 .0 75

0 .0 750 .0 75

0 .1

0 .1

0 .1 25

0 .1 250 .1 5

0 .1 5 0 .1 750 .1 75

0 .1 750 .2

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

-0 .0 05-0 .0 03 75-0 .0 02 5

-0 .0 01 25

-0 .0 01 25

0 .0 01 250 .0 01 25

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

-0 .2 4-0 .1 6

-0 .1 6

-0 .0 8

-0 .0 8

-0 .0 8

0.0

8

0.0

8

0.0

8

0.0

8

0.1

6

0.1

6

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

-0 .0 8-0 .0 8-0 .0 8 -0 .0 8

80

°S

80

°S

60

°S

60

°S

40

°S

40

°S

20

°S

20

°S

0°0°

20

°N

20

°N

40

°N

40

°N

60

°N

60

°N

80

°N

80

°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

80

°S

80

°S

60

°S

60

°S

40

°S

40

°S

20

°S

20

°S

0°0°

20

°N

20

°N

40

°N

40

°N

60

°N

60

°N

80

°N

80

°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

80

°S

80

°S

60

°S

60

°S

40

°S

40

°S

20

°S

20

°S

0°0°

20

°N

20

°N

40

°N

40

°N

60

°N

60

°N

80

°N

80

°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

Page 15: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 15

Wavelet Jb

Convolve again with

0 .0 1 5

0 .0 3

0 .0 4 5

0 .0 6

0 .0 7 5

0 .0 9

0 .1 0 5

0 .1 2

0 .1 3 5

0 .1 5

0 .1 6 5 80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

-0 .0 02 4

-0 .0 02

-0 .0 01 6

-0 .0 01 6

-0 .0 01 6

-0 .0 01 2

-0 .0 01 2

-0 .0 00 8

-0 .0 00 8

-0 .0 00 4

-0 .0 00 4

0 .0 00 4

0 .0 00 4

0 .0 0 0 8

0 .0 00 8

0 .0 008

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

-0 .2-0 .1 5-0 .1-0 .0 5

-0.0

5

-0.0

5

-0.0

5-0 .0 5

0.0

5

0.0

5

0.0

5

0.0

5

0.0

5

0.0

5

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

5

0.1

50.1

5

0.1

5

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

-0.0

8

-0 .0 8 -0 .0 8

-0.0

8

-0.0

8

80

°S

80

°S

60

°S

60

°S

40

°S

40

°S

20

°S

20

°S

0°0°

20

°N

20

°N

40

°N

40

°N

60

°N

60

°N

80

°N

80

°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

80

°S

80

°S

60

°S

60

°S

40

°S

40

°S

20

°S

20

°S

0°0°

20

°N

20

°N

40

°N

40

°N

60

°N

60

°N

80

°N

80

°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

80

°S

80

°S

60

°S

60

°S

40

°S

40

°S

20

°S

20

°S

0°0°

20

°N

20

°N

40

°N

40

°N

60

°N

60

°N

80

°N

80

°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

80°S

80°S

60°S

60°S

40°S

40°S

20°S

20°S

0°0°

20°N

20°N

40°N

40°N

60°N

60°N

80°N

80°N

160°W 120°W 80°W 40°W 0° 40°E 80°E 120°E 160°E

ˆ ( )j n

Page 16: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 16

Wavelet Jb

• Add together to give:

80°S80°S

70°S 70°S

60°S60°S

50°S 50°S

40°S40°S

30°S 30°S

20°S20°S

10°S 10°S

0°0°

10°N 10°N

20°N20°N

30°N 30°N

40°N40°N

50°N 50°N

60°N60°N

70°N 70°N

80°N80°N

160°W

160°W 140°W

140°W 120°W

120°W 100°W

100°W 80°W

80°W 60°W

60°W 40°W

40°W 20°W

20°W 0°

0° 20°E

20°E 40°E

40°E 60°E

60°E 80°E

80°E 100°E

100°E 120°E

120°E 140°E

140°E 160°E

160°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 1 September 2004 12UTC 850hPa vorticity

-0.0812

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

0.7

0.75

0.8

0.85

0.9

0.95

1

2j j j

j

Bx Ψ V Ψ x

Page 17: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 17

Wavelet Jb

• Example: Horizontal and vertical Vorticity Correlations.

North America Equatorial Pacific

Page 18: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 18

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Forecast Day1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5M/S DATE1=20040710/... DATE2=20040710/...

AREA=TROPICS TIME=12 MEAN OVER 55 CASES

ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERROR FORECAST

850 hPa VECTOR WIND

FORECAST VERIFICATION

Wavelet Jb

OPER (28r2)

MAGICS 6.9.1 leda - dai Wed Sep 28 11:13:20 2005 Verify SCOCOM

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Forecast Day3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12M/S DATE1=20040710/... DATE2=20040710/...

AREA=TROPICS TIME=12 MEAN OVER 55 CASES

ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERROR FORECAST

200 hPa VECTOR WIND

FORECAST VERIFICATION

Wavelet Jb

OPER (28r2)

MAGICS 6.9.1 leda - dai Wed Sep 28 11:14:05 2005 Verify SCOCOM

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Forecast Day3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

6

6.5M/S DATE1=20040710/... DATE2=20040710/...

AREA=TROPICS TIME=12 MEAN OVER 53 CASES

ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERROR FORECAST

850 hPa VECTOR WIND

FORECAST VERIFICATION

Wavelet Jb

OPER (28r2)

MAGICS 6.9.1 leda - dai Wed Sep 28 13:07:36 2005 Verify SCOCOM

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Forecast Day5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13M/S DATE1=20040710/... DATE2=20040710/...

AREA=TROPICS TIME=12 MEAN OVER 53 CASES

ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERROR FORECAST

200 hPa VECTOR WIND

FORECAST VERIFICATION

Wavelet Jb

OPER (28r2)

MAGICS 6.9.1 leda - dai Wed Sep 28 13:07:36 2005 Verify SCOCOM

Against analysis Against analysis

Against observations Against observations

Page 19: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 19

L91 0.01

0.02

0.03

0.050.07

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.5

0.7

1

2

3

5

7

10

20

30

50

70

100

200

300

500

700

1000

Pre

ssur

e (h

Pa)

60 levels 91 levels

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

12

14

16

18

20

25

30

35

40455055606570

91

Leve

l num

ber

Page 20: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 20

Higher horizontal and vertical resolution

Anomaly correlation of 500hPa height for northern hemisphere

T511 L60

T799 L91

Day

Mean over 148 cases from 1 August 2004

User Meeting: June 2005

Page 21: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 21

Higher horizontal and vertical resolution

Anomaly correlation of 500hPa height for Europe

T511 L60

T799 L91

Day

Mean over 148 cases from 1 August 2004

User Meeting: June 2005

Page 22: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 22

Higher horizontal and vertical resolution

Anomaly correlation of 500hPa height for southern hemisphere

T511 L60

T799 L91

Day

Mean over 197 00UTC cases from 1 January 2005

Page 23: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 23

Statistical significancet test, 500hPa root-mean-square error

Day 3 Day 5 Day 7

N Hem 0.2% - -

S Hem 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%

Europe 5% 5% -

Green denotes T799L91 better

Page 24: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 24

RMS tropical temperature errors against radiosondes

T511 L60

T799 L91

Mean over 197 00UTC cases from 1 January 2005

500hPa 300hPa

100hPa 50hPa

DayDay

Page 25: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 25

Fit to TEMP observations

used TTEMP-T N.Hemisexp:0028 , ref:oper 2005080100-2005083112(12)

nobsexp

61584 79947 109924 114094 81440 63595 53647 58174 55511 69593 48957 42841 38446 34198 32598 7364

exp - ref

+957 +413 +18

+136 +98

+114 +231 +398 +370 +391 +187 +125 +80 +54 +17 +9

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

STD.DEV

1000 850 700 500 400 300 250 200 150 100 70 50 30 20 10 5

Pre

ssur

e (h

Pa)

-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

BIAS

1000 850 700 500 400 300 250 200 150 100 70 50 30 20 10 5

background departure o-b(ref)background departure o-banalysis departure o-a(ref)

analysis departure o-a

Page 26: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 26

Forecasts of KatrinaD+108h

T511 L60 T799 L91

Page 27: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 27

105

1

959

980

980

990

990

990

1000

1000

10001000

1000

100030°N 30°N

90°W

90°W 20050826 00UTC t+72h VT: 20050829 00UTCT511

Hurricane Katrina - MSLP and 3h accum. precipitation

0.5

1

2

5

10

20

40

70

125

200

300

500

1000

T511

Hurricane Katrina at T511 and T799

198

1

921970

980

980

990

990

990

1000

1000

1000

1000

1000

1000

30°N 30°N

90°W

90°W 20050826 00UTC t+72h VT: 20050829 00UTCT799

Hurricane Katrina - MSLP and 3h accum. precipitation

0.5

1

2

5

10

20

40

70

125

200

300

500

1000

T799

Observed low of 902hPa

921

959

Page 28: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 28

IFS Model Run-times on IBM p690+Resolution

& time-step

CPUs Wall time for 1-day forecast

(minutes)

Gflops on IBM p690+

% of Peak*

T511 L60

900 sec

128 7 81 8.4

T799 L91

720 sec

256 16 177 9.1

T1279 L60

450 sec

512 23 354 9.1

T2047 L60

300 sec

768 68 537 9.2

* Peak is 7.6 Gflops per PE for IBM p690+

Page 29: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 29

Profile for T2047on IBM p690+ (768 CPUs)

Legendre Transforms~17% of total cost of model

Physics ~36% of total cost

Page 30: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 30

Comparison of profilesat different resolutions

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

no

rmal

ized

% c

ost

T511

T799

T1279

T2047

Page 31: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 31

40km

25km

10km

Spectra of total KE

log10k

k-3

k-5/3

Power spectra of total kinetic energy at T511, T799 & T2047

Page 32: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 32

Case-study of an event of heavy rainfall (orographically induced) with severe flooding in the South of France in

September 2002(Observed rainfall in excess of 500mm/24h):

Comparison of precipitation forecast (24-48h range) at

T511, T799, T1279 and T2047

Page 33: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 33

43°N 43°N

44°N44°N

45°N 45°N

3°E

3°E 4°E

4°E 5°E

5°E

ECMWF Analysis VT:Monday 1 January 1996 00UTC Surface: geopotential(orography)

500

2500

4500

6500

8500

10500

12500

14500

16500

18500

20500

21310

10.0m/s

43°N 43°N

44°N44°N

45°N 45°N

3°E

3°E 4°E

4°E 5°E

5°E

Saturday 7 September 2002 12UTC ECMWF Forecast t+36 VT: Monday 9 September 2002 00UTC Surface: 10 mtr u/10 mtr v

10m-Wind for the South of France on 9 September 2002 at 0UTC

10m-wind from T204736h-forecast

Page 34: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 34

Total precipitation accumulated over 24-48h FC-range

30

30

30

30

30

43°N 43°N

44°N44°N

45°N 45°N

3°E

3°E 4°E

4°E 5°E

5°E

Saturday 7 September 2002 12UTC ECMWF Forecast t+48 VT: Monday 9 September 2002 12UTC Surface: **large scale precip

30

60

78.52 30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

90

90

43°N 43°N

44°N44°N

45°N 45°N

3°E

3°E 4°E

4°E 5°E

5°E

Saturday 7 September 2002 12UTC ECMWF Forecast t+48 VT: Monday 9 September 2002 12UTC Surface: **large scale precip

30

60

90

120

150

150.0

30

30

3030

30

30

30

30

90

90

90

150

150

43°N 43°N

44°N44°N

45°N 45°N

3°E

3°E 4°E

4°E 5°E

5°E

Saturday 7 September 2002 12UTC ECMWF Forecast t+48 VT: Monday 9 September 2002 12UTC Surface: **large scale precip

30

60

90

120

150

180

197 30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

90

90

90

150

150

43°N 43°N

44°N44°N

45°N 45°N

3°E

3°E 4°E

4°E 5°E

5°E

Saturday 7 September 2002 12UTC ECMWF Forecast t+48 VT: Monday 9 September 2002 12UTC Surface: **large scale precip

30

60

90

120

150

180

210

240

270

300

322.0

T511

T1279

T799

T2047

max ~78mm

max ~150mm

max ~197mm

max ~321mm

Page 35: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 35

Rainfall Verification over South of Francefor T2047 24-48h forecast

Page 36: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 36

2000/07/18-2005/02/15 100% extreme rain percentile (1674)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Lead-time (days)

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0C

orr

ela

tion

Ski

ll

Z500PT2PPT

Precipitation skill as a function of model resolution

T2047

T1279

T799

T511 (ops)

ACC Z500ACC PT2Station location TP

2000/07/18 – 2005/02/15

Extreme observed rainfall 2002/09/08

H

H

H

L

L

L

0

0

0

0

0

0

10

10

10

ECMWF Analysis VT:Wednesday 14 September 2005 00UTC Surface:

Resolution Europe France

T2047 0.56 0.61

T1279 0.52 0.60

T799 0.45 0.55

T511 (op) 0.38 0.41

90% confidence intervals indicated

Page 37: Some developments at ECMWF during 2005

3 October 2005 27th EWGLAM meeting, Ljubljana 37

Thank you very muchfor your attention