Upload
nguyendang
View
217
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
SOME NUCLEAR ASPECTS OF THE
SAKHAROV CONDITIONS
U. van Kolck
Supported by CNRS and US DOE
Institut de Physique Nucléaire d’Orsay and University of Arizona
I. B ≠ 0 as an initial condition. Difficulty: washed out by inflation
II. B = 0 as initial condition but B ≠ 0 from “baryogenesis” (after inflation)
Requirements? Sakharov ’67
B violation: ∆B ≠ 0 processes deviation from thermal (and chemical) equilibrium: ∆B > 0 and ∆B < 0 processes not to occur at the same rate C and CP violation: B = 0 (B ≠ 0) state (not) invariant under C and CP
10
1 GeV 3 K 3 K
6 10B BB B B
B B T T T
N N N N NN N N Nγ γ
η −
>
− −≡ ⋅
+
First part
Second part
6
3 K
10B
B T
NN
−<
In Standard Model, all conditions fulfilled but not sufficient: B violation: violated by non-perturbative quantum effects from non-Abelian electroweak gauge group --- sphaleron processes, efficient only at temperatures above MEW ~ 100 GeV.
http://www-cdf.lbl.gov/~jmuelm
en/www/ M
icrophysical_mechanism
s.html
C and CP violation: both violated by weak interaction, but CP too small.
deviation from thermal (and chemical) equilibrium: provided by expansion of the universe, but much too slow above MEW ~ 100 GeV.
( )
( )( )
2 3
2 2 4
3 2
1 21 2
1 1CKM
A iU A
A i A
λ λ λ ρ ηλ λ λ λ
λ ρ η λ
− −
= − − + − − −
2 6 8 5( ) 3 10CPJ A λ η λ −= + ⋅
W ±iu
jd
0.23λ ≅
Wolfenstein ’83
Jarlskog ’85
Kobayashi + Maskawa ‘73
0.8A ≅ 0.1ρ ≅ 0.3η ≅
In Standard Model, all conditions fulfilled but not sufficient: B violation: violated by non-perturbative quantum effects from non-Abelian electroweak gauge group --- sphaleron processes, efficient only at temperatures above MEW ~ 100 GeV.
http://www-cdf.lbl.gov/~jmuelm
en/www/ M
icrophysical_mechanism
s.html
C and CP violation: both violated by weak interaction, but CP too small.
deviation from thermal (and chemical) equilibrium: provided by expansion of the universe, but much too slow above MEW ~ 100 GeV.
( )( )( )( )( )( )2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 12
2010CP t b t u c u b s b d s d EWJ m m m m m m m m m m m m M
η−
− − − − − −
e.g. Canetti, Drewes + Shaposhnikov ‘12
“Every disadvantage has its advantage.” J. Cruijff (b. 1947), Dutch soccer player philosopher
new physics
Issue: once a signal is observed,
how many/which observables do we need to identify the new source(s) of T , B ?
Strategy: use Effective Field Theory
to study various T, B effects
Opportunity: any new signal of T, B
is likely to represent new physics
The Way of EFT
QCD
Chiral EFT
Q
(cPT)
| | 1 | | 2, , , ?T B BM M M// ∆ = ∆ =
unknown physics
, ,100 GeV
EW Z WM m mϕ
Standard Model (incl higher dim ops)
hadr
onic
+
nucl
ear
phys
ics
atom
ic
phys
ics ~3 keV
at eM mα
QED
4, , ,
1GeVQCD NM m m fρ ππ
, , ,10 MeV
10
nuc NNM f r mπ π
quarks, gluons, leptons, photon,
weak bosons, Higgs (+dark matter)
(3,1), (3) (2) (1)c L YSO SU SU U× ×
up + down quarks, gluons, electron, …, photon
(3,1), (3) (1)c emSO SU U×
nucleons, pions, electron, …, photon
(3,1), (1) ,(2) (2)
em
L R
SO USU SU×
nuclei, electron, …, photon
(3,1), (1)emSO U
violate S and transform in specific ways under χ symmetry
Main Idea
Chiral EFT
Q
(cPT)
, ,100 GeV
EW Z WM m mϕ
Standard Model (incl higher dim ops)
hadr
onic
+
nucl
ear
phys
ics , , ,
10 MeV1
0nuc NNM f r mπ π
quarks, gluons, leptons, photon,
weak bosons, Higgs (+dark matter)
(3,1), (3) (2) (1)c L YSO SU SU U× ×
nucleons, pions, electron, …, photon
(3,1), (1) ,(2) (2)
em
L R
SO USU SU×
( ) ( ), ,S S ii
q G q GO= +∑
( ) ( )( ), ,EFT S S ii
N NOχ π π∆
∆
= +∑∑
preserves symmetry S
χ symmetry
give rise to specific relations among
S–violating observables
preserves symmetry S
BSM models
low-energy symmetry (violation)
source of S violation
chiral symmetry
Chiral Nuclear Filter
Electromagnetic Form Factors A
Electric Magnetic Toroidal polarity
0 (charge, mono)
1 (di, ana)
2 (quadru)
etc.
,P T
,P T ,P T
,P T ,P T
,P T
,P T
∅ ∅
1S =
1 2S =
0S =
(Permanent) Electric Dipole Moment (EDM)
( )( )
P
edm
edm Td edm
d S E HH d S E
d S E H
→ − ⋅ − = −= − ⋅ → − − ⋅ = −
inside.hlrs.de/_old/htm/Edition_01_11/article_11.htm
l
S
S
E
E
( )22
3 194 104 fm
(4 )tF
n CPW
mGd fe J eM ππ
π−
≈
Weak interactions:
Experiment:
( ) 13
15
0.2 1.5(stat) 0.7(syst) 10 fm
10 fm (UCN, proposed)nd e
e
−
−
= ± ± ⋅
127.9 10 fmpd e−< ⋅
163.1 10 fm (95% c.l.)Hgd e−< ⋅
1610 fm (storage ring, proposed)dd e−
Baker et al ’06 (ILL)
Bodek et al (ILL+PSI) Budker et al (SNS)
Griffith et al ’09 (UW)
Nuclear Schiff moment from RPA, … Dmitriev + Sen’kov ’03
Orlov et al (BNL? COSY?)
e.g. Donoghue, Golowich + Holstein ‘92
Proton and 3He as well? How about 3H?
The Way of EFT Q?TM /
unknown physics
, ,100 GeV
EW Z WM m mϕ
Standard Model (incl higher dim ops)
~3 keV
at eM mα
4, , ,
1GeVQCD NM m m fρ ππ
, , ,10 MeV
10
nuc NNM f r mπ π
quarks, gluons, leptons, photon,
weak bosons, Higgs (+dark matter)
(3,1), (3) (2) (1)c L YSO SU SU U× ×
neglected here
( )
( ) ( )
( )
3 3
2
2
2
1 82
†2
2
1
H.c.
(4 ) H.c.
(4 ) H.c.
L u u R d d R
Bu Wu u R Bd Wd d R
abc a b c
i j i a j aij L R L R L R L R
R R u d
T
T
T
T
M
M
M
M
q G g u g d
g B g W u g B g W d
w f G G G
i q u q d q u q d
u d iD
µνµν
µν µν µν µν
νρ µµν ρ
µµ
σ ϕ ϕ
τ ϕ τ ϕ
π ε σ σ λ λ
π ξ γ ϕ ϕ
− +
+ + + + +
+
+ + +
+ +
+
i iju djϕ ε ϕ∗=e.g. single Higgs
dim
ensi
on
[ ]
2
2
2H.c. Tr16
L q L
sL u u R d d R
q g W U q
gq f u f d G G
µµ
µνµν
γ τ
θϕ ϕπ
± ± = −
+ + + + +
CKM matrix (dim=4)
q term (dim=4)
53 10CPJ −⋅
1010θ −<
small…
G Gρσµν µνρσε≡
quark EDM (eff dim=6)
quark color-EDM (eff dim=6)
gluon color-EDM (dim=6) four-quark
contact (dim=6)
Jarlskog ’85
‘t Hooft ‘76
LR four-quark contact (dim=6)
Buchmüller + Wyler ’86 Weinberg ’89
de Rujula et al. ’91 …
Ng + Tulin ‘11
, , 100 GeVEW Z WM m mϕ
The Way of EFT
QCD
Q?TM /
, ,100 GeV
EW Z WM m mϕ
~3 keV
at eM mα
4, , ,
1GeVQCD NM m m fρ ππ
, , ,10 MeV
10
nuc NNM f r mπ π
up + down quarks, gluons, electron, …, photon
(3,1), (3) (1)c emSO SU U×
q
q Baluni ‘79 chiral rotation
imaginary mass term
4 MeV2
u dm mm ≈+
≡13
d u
u d
m mm m
ε+
≡−
average quark mass mass splitting
up/down quarks
m fϕ
RG
q
q
q q
+ … very small…
neglected from now on…
RG ( )21
2mm θ ε θ∗ = −m θ∗
W
4, , , 1GeVQCD NM m m fρ ππ
ϕ
G
G
+ …
+ …
+ …
+ …
,Z B A
W
( )2 24 Ti Mπ σ
2Tw M
2Tg M
2Tg M
( )2 24 TMπ ξ
)2
(
T
iq M
gcf
m =
( )iqc
)2
(
T
iq
mM
egdf
=
( )iqd
2T
Gwc
M
=
Gc
2
2
(4 )i
T
i
MC π σ
=
iC
2
2(4 )i
TMD π ξ
=
iD
… Dekens + De Vries ’13
+
+ …
+ RG
generically, RG brings in effects of ( )1
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
23 5
(0) (1)3
(0) (1)3
15 5
85 5
13 5
8
1 Tr2
12
1212
6
4
4
4
4
QCD s
q q
q q
abc a b cG
a a a a
ij i j
q i g G q G G
qq q q qi q
q c c G q
q d d q F
c f G G G
C qq qi q q q qi q
C q q qi q q q qi q
D q q q
m
q
m
D
m
µνµν
µνµν
µνµν
νρ µµν ρ
µµ
ε τ ε θ γ
τ σ
τ σ
γ γ
λ γ λ λ γ λ
ε τ γ τ γ γ
ε
= ∂/ + / −
− + + −
− +
− +
+
+ − ⋅
+ − ⋅
+
+
τ τ
τ τ
3 5a a
ij i jq q q qµµτ γ λ τ γ γ λ
+
q
CIC
gCEDM
qEDM
qCEDM
uq
d
=
two flavors
)2
(
T
iq
mM
egdf
=
)2
(
T
iq M
gcf
m =
2T
Gwc
M
=
2
2
(4 )i
T
i
MC π σ
=
LRC 2
2(4 )i
TMD π ξ
=
N.B. To this order, T P→
The Way of EFT
Chiral EFT
Q
(cPT)
?TM /
, ,100 GeV
EW Z WM m mϕ
hadr
onic
+
nucl
ear
EDM
s
~3 keV
at eM mα
4, , ,
1GeVQCD NM m m fρ ππ
, , ,10 MeV
10
nuc NNM f r mπ π
nucleons, pions, electron, …, photon
(3,1), (1) ,(2) (2)
em
L R
SO USU SU×
q
RG
A+
qq N
+ …
…
…
…
π
+ …
+ …
+ …
+ …
, , , 10 MeV1 0nuc NNM f r mπ π
short-range isoscalar
and isovector (-> proton
and neutron) EDMs
isoscalar and isovector P, T
pion-nucleon couplings
isoscalar and isovector (derivative) P, T
2-nucleon contacts
three-pion coupling
0,1d
1,2C
0,1gfπ
2 fπ
∆
Mereghetti, Hockings + v.K. ’10 De Vries et al, ‘13
N
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
23 5
(0) (1)3
(0) (1)3
15 5
85 5
13 5
8
1 Tr2
12
1212
6
4
4
4
4
QCD s
q q
q q
abc a b cG
a a a a
ij i j
q i g G q G G
qq q q qi q
q c c G q
q d d q F
c f G G G
C qq qi q q q qi q
C q q qi q q q qi q
D q q q
m
q
m
D
m
µνµν
µνµν
µνµν
νρ µµν ρ
µµ
ε τ ε θ γ
τ σ
τ σ
γ γ
λ γ λ λ γ λ
ε τ γ τ γ γ
ε
= ∂/ + / −
− + + −
− +
− +
+
+ − ⋅
+ − ⋅
+
+
τ τ
τ τ
3 5a a
ij i jq q q qµµτ γ λ τ γ γ λ
+
q
CIC
gCEDM
qEDM
qCEDM
uq
d
=
two flavors
(2) (2) (4)L RSU SU SO×
chiral symmetry
)2
(
T
iq
mM
egdf
=
)2
(
T
iq M
gcf
m =
2T
Gwc
M
=
2
2
(4 )i
T
i
MC π σ
=
LRC 2
2(4 )i
TMD π ξ
=
N.B. To this order, T P→
Key to disentangle TV sources: each breaks chiral symmetry in a particular way,
and thus produces different hadronic interactions
Mereghetti, Hockings + v.K. ’10 De Vries et al, ‘13
q
qCEDM
qEDM
gCEDM
CIC
LRC
a chiral pseudo-vector: same as quark mass difference
a chiral vector
a rank-2 chiral tensor
another rank-2 chiral tensor
{ }1,8,w wσ →chiral invariants: cannot be separated at low energies, CI
link to P,T-conserving charge symmetry breaking
( )( )
( ) ( )
2†
†0 1 3
†0 1 3
† † † †1 2
23
2
2
12
2
PTN
N Nm
N d d S N F
N g g N
C N N N S N C N N N S N
f
f
χ
µ
π
π
νµ ν
µ µµ µ
τ
π
π
= ⋅ + +
− +
− ⋅ +
+ ∂ + ⋅∂
∆−
+
τ π
τ τ
π
iv
v
Where are the differences?
PV, TV pion-nucleon coupling
short-range EDM contribution
PV, TV two-nucleon contact
terms related by chiral symmetry + higher orders six LO couplings
for EDMs cf. Barton ’61
and nuclear followers
three-pion coupling
( )1,0µ =
v
0,2
S µ σ =
velocity
spin
2
m
0
q( )n p
mm
gm
π
−∆ = only for LRC
[ ]0 1 3,1
2T N N g gDf
Nππ
π= − ⋅ + +τ π
There are differences!
2 2 22
2 20
3
2 2, , , ,QCD QCD QCD QCD
TCD T TQ T
g gg wm m mm M M M M
M f fM M M Mπ π ππ αθ εξ
π// //
=
2 2
2 2
3 2
24
1
3
2, , , ,QCD Q
T
CD QCD QCD
TCD T TQ
g gg wf fM M M M
m Mm MM
mm M Mπ π ππ αθ ε ξπ// //
=
For example,
different orders; two-derivative interactions
important at higher order
pion physics suppressed
comparable to two-derivative
interactions
N.B. 2 3 3g N Nπ τ in high orders for all sources up to dim 6
( )0 qm23 MeV
n pm mg θεθ
−
≈
1)
2) for q, link to CSB, e.g.
using lattice QCD (Beane et al ’06)
Mereghetti, Hockings + v.K. ’10
Crewther et al ’79 Thomas ’95
… Hockings + v.K. ‘05
Narison ‘08 Ottnad et al ’10
De Vries et al ’10’11
Nucleon EDFF (to NLO)
0TJ = + + + …
LO for all sources ensures RG invariance brings in two parameters
provides estimates in terms of pion parameters at “reasonable” renormalization scale
order depends on source short-ranged; long-ranged;
( ) ( )2 ( ( ) 2)1
2( ) ' ( )i i i iEF d S qHq q− = + + −
p
'q p p= −
'1 ( )2
N
p pk
m
= +
− v
'p
( ) ( ) ]( )(0) (1)1
2 21 3, 2 ( ) ( )T E
NE
kq k q q S F
mqFqJ µ µρ µσ ν
ρσ
νσρρη η η τ/
= − − + + − + −
v
EDM + Schiff moment + …
( )( )
(0) (0) 0 12
02
2qm30 1
44 3N Q
n
CD
pAeg gm
gd dMf
m mmg
mm
π π
ππ
ππ
= + + + − +
−
( )( )0
2 2 2em(1) (1) 0 1
20
22
52 ln 144 5
A
N QCD
g g g m m
m Mfd d L
m me
gm mπ ππ π
ππ π
ππ
µ ± = + + + + − +
−
2 ln 44 EL
dγ π≡ − +
−cf. Crewther et al `79
( )2
32
1| | ln 2.0 10 fm2
2
4A N N
ne
fd mg m e
mπππ
δ ε θ θε
−−> ≈ ⋅
( )2
(0) 42
1 3| | 1.4 104
fm2 4
N
N
NA mm mmf m
g ed e π
ππ
ε πθ δ
π
δ θε
− −> − ≈ ⋅
renormalization q
q
Shintani et al. ‘14
Mereghetti + vK ‘15
no sign of chiral loop, but
Example from lattice
consistent with naïve estimate
( )( )0
2 2 2em(1) 0
2 22 2
5' 146 4
A
N QCD
m mg gm Mmf m
eS m mπ π
π
π π
ππππ ±
= − − +
−
( )( ) 2
qm( 022
0)24
' 026 QC
A n p
D
m m mm Mf
egm
gSπ
π
ππ
ππ
= − + +
−
Thomas ’95
6 35.0 10 fmeθ−− ⋅
q
momentum dependence of EDFF from lattice would isolate
5 36.8 10 fmeθ−⋅
q only parameter!
0g
Nuclear EDMs, MQMs, …
TJ
Tψ
TJ
TVTJ
TV
Tψ
TψTψ Tψ
Tψ
= + +
…
… …
…
…
…
… …
…
…
0TJ
…
… = + + …
Analogous for ,T TJ J De Vries, Mereghetti, Liu,
Timmermans + v.K. ‘12
De Vries, Mereghetti, Higa, Liu, Stetcu,
Timmermans + v.K. ’11 0TJ
0TJ
…
… = + + … 0
TJ Park, Min + Rho ’95 …
Maekawa, Mereghetti, De Vries + v.K. ’11 De Vries, Mereghetti, Timmermans + v.K. ‘13
TV = + + + + + + …
…
…
generic LO, but effect vanishes for q when N=Z
+
LO for LRC only
+ …
Tψ
… from solution of the Schrödinger equation
introduces dependence on binding energy AB
Weinberg ’90, ‘91 Ordónez + v.K. ‘92
…
Light-Nuclear EDMs (LO)
nnm d
ep
n
dd
q term qEDM qCEDM 2
2QCD
nuc
MMθ
( )1
2
2T
nuc
MMg
f
( )1
2
2T
nuc
MMg
f
( )1 ( )1
2
2
T
QCDwM
M
gCEDM, CIC
Crewther et al. ’79 Thomas ’95 … De Vries et al. ’10’11
LRC
2
2
T
QCDMM
ξ
( )1
( )1 ( )1 ( )1d
n
dd
2
2nuc
QCDMM
2
2nuc
QCDMM
t
h
dd
h
n
dd
2
2nuc
QCDMM
2
2nuc
QCDMM
2
2nuc
QCDMM
( )1 ( )1
( )1 ( )1 ( )1 ( )1 ( )1
De Vries et al ’11 ’13 Bsaisou et al ’13 ’14 ‘15
[135] De Vries et al ‘11 [147] Khriplovich + Korkin ‘00 [87] Bsaisou et al ‘15 [131] Liu + Timmermans ‘04 [136] De Vries et al ‘11 [137] Bsaisou et al ‘13 [138] Yamanaka + Hiyama ‘15 [132] Stetcu et al ‘08 [134] Song et al ‘13
all agree to 10% or better
Mereghetti + vK ‘15
d n pd d d+ for q term, qEDM, gCEDM, CIC for q term and qEDM ( )0.84h t n pd d d d+ +
3h t dd d d+ for qCEDM for qEDM ( )0.94h t n pd d d d− −
some separation of sources possible
B VIOLATION
in progress, with
Bingwei Long (Sichuan) and
Jan Bakker (Groningen), Rob Timmermans (Groningen),
Jordy de Vries (NIKHEF)
dim=6
Weinberg ’79 Wiczek + Zee ’79 Abbott + Wise ’82 …
Chang + Chang ’80 Kuo + Love ’80 Rao + Shrock ’82 …
Abbott + Wise ’82 …
Özer ’82 Caswell, Milutinović + Senjanović ’83 … Buchoff + Wagman ‘15
( ) [ ]2 5| |
( ) ( )| |
1 |
|
|
2
2
1 |,i iB B T T T
B i iBi iB
q Gc c
qqql q Cq q C q CM
q qM ∆ = ∆
∆ = ∆
=
= = + + + + ∑ ∑
interesting only if
| | 2 | | 1B BM M∆ = ∆ =
B L− not exact (why would it be?)
(true in some models)
| | 1,B L B∆ = ∆ = ∆ | | 2, 0B L∆ = ∆ =dim=9
RG
Conclusion
Stronger conclusions possible with lattice QCD calculations for various B, T sources heavy nuclear EFT formulation.
Chiral symmetry provides a handle to (partially) distinguish B, T sources at low energies
Baryon asymmetry in the universe suggests that new sources of B, T might be important, but they must exist anyway because B, T broken already in SM
Light-nuclear EDM measurements could provide the needed data to isolate T sources
EFT provides a model-independent framework for B, T in the SM and beyond
B in progress