Upload
mya
View
19
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
K. Artoos , S. Janssens, C. Collette (ULB), M . Esposito, C . Eymin, P . Fernandez Carmona. Status of the Main Beam quadrupole nano-positioning + some objectives within PACMAN. K. Artoos , CLIC Workshop 2014. Outline. Intro + Link to the PACMAN project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
STATUS OF THE MAIN BEAM QUADRUPOLE NANO-POSITIONING
+ SOME OBJECTIVES WITHIN PACMANK. Artoos , S. Janssens, C. Collette (ULB), M. Esposito, C. Eymin, P. Fernandez Carmona
K. Artoos , CLIC Workshop 2014
2
Outline
Intro + Link to the PACMAN project Design + Construction of the type 1
stabilisation system First measurements 2014
3
Possible mitigation techniques:• Alignment• B.P.M. + dipole correctors• B.P.M. + Nano positioning• Seismometers + Dipole correctors• Mechanical stabilization with seismometers
f
Ground motion mitigation
StabilisationAlignment
BPM Quad Fidu
4
Compatibility of cascaded systems
BPM
(m) 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 10-6 10-7 10-8 10-9 10-10
Alignment
Magn. Fidu.
BPM
Nanopos.
Stabilisation
RangeAccuracy
Precision/resolution
Each system position should be unique above its resolution + known
Interaction ranges and accuracy Conditions precision and accuracy cascaded systems Conditions for > 6 d.o.f., Abbé errors + deformations
5
Boundary conditions
Accelerator environmentHigh radiation Stray magnetic fieldLarge temperature variations
Stiffness-Robustness Applied forces (water cooling, vacuum, power leads, cabling, interconnects, ventilation, acoustic pressure)
-Transportability/Installation
Available spaceIntegration in two beam module620 mm beam height
Stiff actuating systemK> 100 N/μm vertical+lateral
Longitudinal transport lockingSuccessfully tested with x-y prototype
Ok, type 1 was not easy
No manpower
Tests in 2014
6
Concept for MBQ
• Inclined stiff piezo actuator pairs with flexural hinges (vertical + lateral motion) (four linked bars system)• X-y flexural guide to block roll + longitudinal d.o.f.+ increased lateral stiffness.
Flexural pins
7
Concept for MBQ
A stiff but light Fixed frame around the mobile part, objective Natural frequencies > 100 Hz
8
Concept for MBQ
Central fixed partMagnet mounted with assembly tool
9
Concept for MBQ
10
Concept for MBQ
11
Concept for MBQ
12
Modal analysis Type 1(simulation) soon to be tested
201 Hz
140 Hz122 Hz
241 Hz
13
X-y positioning: Study precision, accuracy and resolution
14
Comparison sensors
Sensor Resolution Main + Main -
Actuator sensor 0.15 nm No separate assembly
ResolutionNo direct measurement of magnet movement
Capacitive gauge 0.10 nm Gauge radiation hard Mounting tolerancesGain change w. Orthogonal coupling
Interferometer 10 pm Accuracy at freq.> 10 Hz
CostMounting toleranceSensitive to air flowOrthogonal coupling
Optical ruler 0.5*-1 nm Cost1% orthogonal couplingMounting toleranceSmall temperature driftPossible absolute sensor
Rad hardness sensor head not knownLimited velocity displacements
Seismometer (after integration)
< pm at higher frequencies
For cross calibration
K.Artoos, Stabilisation WG , 21th February 2013
15
Displacement sensors
+ actuator gauges, interferometer + seismometers (calibration)
16
First measurementsMeasured still on the assembly bench, not on the floor….
17
First measurements
• (Noisy, especially laterally)
• Good precision• Calibration is
needed for a better accuracy
Horizontal motion:(with gain correction for roll)
18
First measurements
Testing of the range
19
Type 1
Collocated pair
X-y proto
Seismometer FB max. gain +FF (FBFFV1mod): 7 % luminosity loss(no stabilisation 68 % loss)
Concept demonstration actuator support with staged test benches
EUCARDdeliverable
20
2014
Assemble type 4, all parts ready (- assembly tool)
T1 + T4 : combine stabilisation and alignment
Extensive testing stabilisation, nano positioning + in combination. First “PACMAN tests”.
Sensor out sourcing + testing Study alternatives for BDS actuating systems (decrease roll)
21
Spare slides
22
Nano positioning sensors
Heidenhain : 1nm resolution < 1000 CHFRenishaw: 1 nm resolution < 1000 CHF
Smallest LSB can be used as quadrature …. 0.1 nm resolution is already possible
Technological innovation: ABSOLUTE optical encoders
Faster measurements
23
Integrated luminosity simulations
No stabilization 68% luminosity lossSeismometer FB maximum gain (V1)
13%
Seismometer FB medium gain (V1mod)
6% (reduced peaks @ 0.1 and 75 Hz)
Seis. FB max. gain +FF (FBFFV1mod)
7%
Inertial ref. mass 1 Hz (V3mod)
11%
Inertial ref. mass 1 Hz + HP filter (V3)
3%
Courtesy J. Snuverink, J. Pfingstner et al.Commercial Seismometer
Custom Inertial Reference mass
K.Artoos, Stabilisation WG , 21th February 2013Stef Janssens
24
Resolution limitationsSensors
Stabilisation
Limitations:1. Thermal stability
(*alignment)2. EM stray fields3. Sensor resolution
(wavelength light)Expected maximum one order of magnitude improvement resolution in next decade (Without major technological innovation) Low freq. is where you can win the most
Michelson Stabilised LASER
25
Nano positioning
« Nano-positioning» feasibility studyModify position quadrupole in between pulses (~ 5 ms)
Range ± 5 μm, increments 10 to 50 nm, precision ± 0.25 nm
• Lateral and vertical•In addition/ alternative dipole correctors
• Use to increase time to next realignment with cams
26
X-y Positioning: roll
1&2Parasitic roll
S. Janssens, CLIC Workshop, January 2013
-2 legs 3 d.o.f. > parasitic roll-Measured with 3-beam interferometer-~3 μm lateral movement > ~7 μrad rotation-Early simulations suggest~100 μrad/0.5% luminosity loss (J. Pfingstner)
27
Roll simulations
28
Mass/Actuator Resolution/ Range/k/ Bandwidth
𝑓 0 (𝜔 )=√𝑘𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟
𝑚𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑
Stress < depolarisation stressA For same Range: P
A
Bandwidth is limited by
Remark about load compensating springs:
• Actuator slew rate
Frequency
Am
plit
ude
Range
Force
Load compensation reduces range + bandwidthImproves resolution *