8
STRUCTURAL FIRE PROTECTION IN JAPAN K. Kawagoel, H. Saito2, H. Sato3, T. Ouchi 3 'Center for Fire Science and Technology, Science University of Tokyo, 2641 Yamasaki, Noda-shi, Chiba 278 Japan 2Department of Architectural Engineering Faculty of Engi- neering, Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoicho Chiba 260 Japan 3Kajima Institute of Construction Technology, 19-1 Tobitakyu 2-Chome, Chofu-shi, Tokyo 182 Japan 1. Introduction As buildings become larger, taller and more complicated, well-grounded principles for a design system for building fire safety are required, in which various countermeasures against fires are combined effectively. In Japan, however, existing fire regula- tions are the specification type, so there are many problems, such as the great expense necessary for installing many countermeasures against fires. Even if fire prevention installation are equipped sufficiently, required fire resistance is not reduced. With the above i n mind, a research project, "Development of Design System for Building Fire Safety", was initiated in April, 1982 as a five year project sponsored by the Ministry of Construc- tion. This project had the cooperation of people from many differ- ent areas, and was concluded i n 1987. As a result of this project, new design regulations for structural fire protection were proposed, based on well-grounded principles established by analytical method. procedure for fire resistance of buildings in Japan, and give an outline of the new design regulations for structural fire protection and an example of design based on these regulations. 2. Traditional design procedure In this paper, we will explain the traditional design At present, the fire resistance of a building is es- tablished by certification of the required performance according to the number of stories of the building and building elements by standard fire resistance tests, similar to many other countries. Specifically, Article 27 of the Building Standard Law specifies certain buildings which should be fireproof or quasi- fireproof. fireproof or quasi-fireproof in fire protection districts and quasi- fire protection districts, respectively. Article 107 of the Build- ing Standard Law Enforcement Order specifies the required fire re- sistance according to the number of stories of a buildings and building elements. tion, specification of standard fireproof construction and the INTERFLAM '88 PAGE 179 Articles 61 and 62 specify buildings which ought to be In the Notification of the Ministry of Construc-

Structural fire protection in Japan

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Structural fire protection in Japan

STRUCTURAL FIRE PROTECTION I N JAPAN

K . Kawagoel, H . S a i t o 2 , H . Sa to3 , T. Ouchi 3

'Center f o r F i r e S c i e n c e and Technology, S c i e n c e U n i v e r s i t y o f Tokyo, 2641 Yamasaki, Noda-shi, Chiba 278 Japan 2Department o f A r c h i t e c t u r a l E n g i n e e r i n g F a c u l t y o f Engi- n e e r i n g , Chiba U n i v e r s i t y , 1-33 Yayoicho Chiba 260 J a p a n 3Kajima I n s t i t u t e of C o n s t r u c t i o n Technology, 19-1 Tob i t akyu 2-Chome, Chofu-shi , Tokyo 182 J a p a n

1. I n t r o d u c t i o n

A s b u i l d i n g s become l a r g e r , t a l l e r and more c o m p l i c a t e d , well-grounded p r i n c i p l e s f o r a d e s i g n sys t em f o r b u i l d i n g f i r e safety are r e q u i r e d , i n which v a r i o u s coun te rmeasu res a g a i n s t f i r e s are combined e f f e c t i v e l y . I n J a p a n , however, e x i s t i n g f i r e r e g u l a - t i o n s are t h e s p e c i f i c a t i o n t y p e , s o t h e r e are many problems, s u c h as t h e g r e a t expense n e c e s s a r y f o r i n s t a l l i n g many coun te rmeasu res a g a i n s t f i r e s . Even i f f i r e p r e v e n t i o n i n s t a l l a t i o n are equ ipped s u f f i c i e n t l y , r e q u i r e d f i r e r e s i s t a n c e is n o t r educed .

With t h e above i n mind, a r e s e a r c h p r o j e c t , "Development of Design System f o r B u i l d i n g F i r e S a f e t y " , was i n i t i a t e d i n A p r i l , 1982 a s a f i v e y e a r p r o j e c t sponsored by t h e M i n i s t r y of Cons t ruc - t i o n . T h i s p r o j e c t had t h e c o o p e r a t i o n of p e o p l e from many d i f f e r - e n t areas, and was concluded i n 1987.

A s a r e s u l t of t h i s p r o j e c t , new d e s i g n r e g u l a t i o n s f o r s t r u c t u r a l f i r e p r o t e c t i o n were p roposed , based on wel l -grounded p r i n c i p l e s e s t a b l i s h e d by a n a l y t i c a l method.

p rocedure f o r f i r e r e s i s t a n c e o f b u i l d i n g s i n Japan, and g i v e a n o u t l i n e of t h e new d e s i g n r e g u l a t i o n s f o r s t r u c t u r a l f i r e p r o t e c t i o n and an example of d e s i g n based on t h e s e r e g u l a t i o n s .

2. T r a d i t i o n a l d e s i g n p r o c e d u r e

I n t h i s p a p e r , w e w i l l e x p l a i n t h e t r a d i t i o n a l d e s i g n

A t p r e s e n t , t h e f i r e r e s i s t a n c e of a b u i l d i n g i s es- t a b l i s h e d by c e r t i f i c a t i o n of t h e r e q u i r e d performance a c c o r d i n g t o t h e number of s t o r i e s o f t h e b u i l d i n g and b u i l d i n g e l e m e n t s by s t a n d a r d f i r e r e s i s t a n c e tes ts , similar t o many o t h e r c o u n t r i e s .

S p e c i f i c a l l y , Article 27 of t h e B u i l d i n g S t a n d a r d Law s p e c i f i e s c e r t a i n b u i l d i n g s which s h o u l d be f i r e p r o o f o r q u a s i - f i r e p r o o f . f i r e p r o o f o r q u a s i - f i r e p r o o f i n f i r e p r o t e c t i o n d i s t r i c t s and q u a s i - f i r e p r o t e c t i o n d i s t r i c t s , r e s p e c t i v e l y . Art ic le 107 of t h e Bu i ld - i n g S t a n d a r d Law Enforcement Orde r s p e c i f i e s t h e r e q u i r e d f i r e re- s i s t a n c e a c c o r d i n g t o t h e number o f s t o r i e s of a b u i l d i n g s and b u i l d i n g e l e m e n t s . t i o n , s p e c i f i c a t i o n of s t a n d a r d f i r e p r o o f c o n s t r u c t i o n and t h e

INTERFLAM '88 PAGE 179

Articles 61 and 6 2 s p e c i f y b u i l d i n g s which ough t t o b e

I n t h e N o t i f i c a t i o n of t h e M i n i s t r y of Construc-

Page 2: Structural fire protection in Japan

d e s i g n a t e d method o f new f i r e p r o o f c o n s t r u c t i o n are p r e s c r i b e d .

proved s p e c i f i c a t i o n s f o r t h e r e q u i r e d f i r e r e s i s t a n c e time w i t h o u t s p e c i a l knowledge o f s t r u c t u r a l f i r e p r o t e c t i o n d e s i g n . c e d u r e h a s t h e advan tage o f f a c i l i t a t i n g d e s i g n , b u t l a c k s r a t i o - n a l i t y and s a f e t y .

f o r s teel s t r u c t u r e s i n J a p a n is by s p r a y i n g on rockwool cement m o r t a r . case by case. s u c h a s s i l i c a - a l u m i n a m i x t u r e s .

3 . A new d e s i g n method f o r s t r u c t u r a l f i r e p r o t e c t i o n

I n t h i s way, d e s i g n e r s c a n proceed by s e l e c t i n g t h e ap-

T h i s pro-

I n t h i s c o n n e c t i o n , t h e main f i r e p r o o f c o n s t r u c t i o n method

C ladd ing w i t h s i l i c e o u s c a l c i u m boa rd e tc . is a p p l i e d on a N e w developments i n c l u d e f i r e p r o t e c t i o n materials

The development g roup f o r f i r e p r o t e c t i o n of b u i l d i n g s t r u c t u r e s w i t h t h i s p r o j e c t a c t i v e l y developed a l o g i c a l method o f d e s i g n f o r s t r u c t u r a l f i r e p r o t e c t i o n based on t h e p r e d i c t i o n o f r e a l f i r e b e h a v i o r , t h e r m a l and s t r u c t u r a l behav io r .

t h i s method: (1) O u t l i n e o f d e s i g n p rocedure

p r o t e c t i o n is c a l c u l a t e d p r e d i c t i o n o f t h e b e h a v i o r of f i r e s , t h e r - mal b e h a v i o r and s t r u c t u r a l b e h a v i o r , f o r d i f f e r e n t b u i l d i n g s . The g e n e r a l p rocedure i s a s f o l l o w s (see F ig .1 ) :

The f o l l o w i n g i s a n o u t l i n e o f t h e d e s i g n p rocedure u s i n g

The p r i n c i p l e of t h i s d e s i g n method f o r s t r u c t u r a l f i r e

Set- t h e g o a l f o r f i r e r e s i s t a n c e . S e t t h e f i r e compartment. S e t s a f e t y f a c t o r s and d e s i g n c o n s t a n t s r e l a t i n g t o b e h a v i o r p r e d i c t i o n . Propose d e s i g n o f b u i l d i n g e l e m e n t s which s u p p o r t and c o n s t i t u t e t h e f i r e compartment, and se t c r i t e r i a f o r e v a l u a t i o n o f f i r e r e s i s t a n c e c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o t h e g o a l . C a l c u l a t e t h e f o l l o w i n g : a. F i r e t empera tu re - t ime r e l a t i o n i n a compartment. b . Temperature- t ime r e l a t i o n f o r b u i l d i n g e l e m e n t s w i t h t h e

p r e d i c t e d f i re b e h a v i o r . c . Deformation and s t r e n g t h of b u i l d i n g e l e m e n t s w i t h t h e above

t empera tu re - t ime r e l a t i o n s . I f i t is d i f f i c u l t t o c a l c u l a t e t h e above , make p r e d i c t i o n s by s t a n d a r d t e s t methods. Confirm t h a t t h e r e s u l t s of b e h a v i o r p r e d i c t i o n s a t i s f y t h e c r i te r ia f o r f i r e r e s i s t a n c e . Repeat s t e p s 3 t o 7 f o r e a c h f i r e compartment.

The p rocedure of t h i s d e s i g n method is t o p r e d i c t t h e I

above b e h a v i o r and e v a l u a t e s t r u c t u r a l s a f e t y up t o a f i r e p r o c e s s as t h e g o a l . E v a l u a t i o n o f d e s i g n performance of s t r u c t u r a l f i r e p r o t e c t i o n i s t o c e r t i f y t h a t t h e p r e d i c t e d b e h a v i o r (unexposed s u r - f a c e t e m p e r a t u r e , de fo rma t ion and s t r e n g t h o f b u i l d i n g e l e m e n t s o r f r a m e s , e t c . ) s a t i s f i e s t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g c r i te r ia f o r e v a l u a t i o n .

methods of a n a l y s i s , app rox ima te c a l c u l a t i o n programs and d e s i g n d i a - grams are p r e p a r e d . F o r b u i l d i n g s n o t r e q u i r i n g e x a c t p r e d i c t i o n of b e h a v i o r , d e s i g n s based on a n e q u i v a l e n t f i r e d u r a t i o n time may b e

For behav io r p r e d i c t i o n i n t h i s d e s i g n method, v a r i o u s

INTERFLAM '88 PAGE 180

Page 3: Structural fire protection in Japan
Page 4: Structural fire protection in Japan

p e r m i t t e d .

i t can be a p p l i e d t o r e i n f o r c e d c o n c r e t e s t r u c t u r e s . For t h i s t y p e of s t r u c t u r e , it i s a l l o w a b l e f o r p r e d i c t i o n c a l c u l a t i o n s t o be conducted f o r d e s i g n f i r e behav io r and t e m p e r a t u r e r i se of b u i l d - i n g e l emen t s . r e s i s t a n c e tests, t h a t is a l l o w a b l e steel t e m p e r a t u r e , e tc . ( 2 ) Example of d e s i g n

o f f i c e b u i l d i n g w i t h a s tee l s t r u c t u r e of 30 f l o o r s as shown i n F ig .2 . 1) C a l c u l a t i o n of f i re temperature- t ime c u r v e

t h e f i r e temperature- t ime r e l a t i o n w a s c a l c u l a t e d .

Though t h i s d e s i g n method mainly c o n c e r n s steel s t r u c t u r e ,

F i r e r e s i s t a n c e e v a l u a t i o n i s based on s t a n d a r d f i r e

S t r u c t u r a l f i r e p r o t e c t i o n d e s i g n w a s c a r r i e d o u t on a n

Based on t h e b a s i c t h e o r y developed by Kawagoe and Sek ine ,

C o n d i t i o n s of a n a l y s i s The f i r e was assumed t o o c c u r on t h e 3 r d f l o o r , w i t h t h e

f i r e compartment be ing t h e whole a p a r t from t h e c o r e . F i r e l o a d d e n s i t y : 49.17 Kg/m' (x + 0 based on observed r e s u l t s

under similar c o n d i t i o n s ) Opening: 1 . 7 m h i g h , 1 4 . 4 m wide a t c e n t e r and 11.2 m wide

Surroundings: Ou te r wall - normal c o n c r e t e 70 mm t h i c k a t t h e edges.

F l o o r s l a b - normal c o n c r e t e 120 mm t h i c k P a r t i t i o n - gypsum board

F l o o r h e i g h t : 3.5 m C a l c u l a t e d r e s u l t s

r e l a t i o n are shown i n Fig.3. 2 ) C a l c u l a t i o n of temperature- t ime r e l a t i o n f o r b u i l d i n g e l e m e n t s

r a t u r e - t i m e r e l a t i o n shown i n F i g . 3 was c a l c u l a t e d by t h e one- d imens iona l d i f f e r e n t i a l method. C o n d i t i o n s of a n a l y s i s

p r o t e c t i o n material, and t h e s tee l temperature- t ime r e l a t i o n was c a l c u l a t e d f o r s e v e r a l t h i c k n e s s e s . f o r t h e t h e r m a l p r o p e r t i e s :

a . S p e c i f i c g r a v i t y : 300 Kg/m' b. Mois tu re c o n t e n t : 1% c. S p e c i f i c h e a t : 0 .22 Kcal/Kg"C 3. Thermal c o n d u c t i v i t y : Depending on t e m p e r a t u r e ,

The c a l c u l a t e d r e s u l t s of t h e f i r e temperature- t ime

S t e e l t empera tu re r i se when exposed t o a f i r e w i t h tempe-

Sprayed rockwool cement mor t a r was assumed t o be t h e f i r e

The f o l l o w i n g v a l u e s were used

0.054(O°C) - 0.2375(900°C) Kcal/mh"C

INTERFLAM '88 PAGE 182

Page 5: Structural fire protection in Japan

Fig .2 Plan F i g . 3 F i r e temperature- t ime curve

C a l c u l a t e d r e s u l t s The c a l c u l a t e d r e s u l t s of s t e e l t empera ture are shown i n

F i g . 4 and 5. is l a r g e and s tee l tempera ture rise i s s m a l l w i t h a r e l a t i v e t h i n l a r g e r of f i r e p r o t e c t i o n material.

A s column walls are 60-100 mm t h i c k , thermal c a p a c i t y

F i g . 4 C a l c u l a t i o n r e s u l t s (Column C1)

TIW(MINWE1

F i g . 5 C a l c u l a t i o n r e s u l t s (Beam G 2 )

INTERFL AM '88 PAGE 183

Page 6: Structural fire protection in Japan

3 ) C a l c u l a t i o n o f deformat ion and s t r e n g t h - t i m e r e l a t i o n f o r b u i l d i n g e lements

C a l c u l a t i o n of deformation and s t rength- t ime r e l a t i o n f o r b u i l d i n g e lements was c a r r i e d o u t w i t h a @ - @ f rame and a @ - a f rame, as shown i n Fig.6. S i x f l o o r s were ana lysed .

I c3 CI a3 1 cz 1

c4 c3 I cz I a3 a3

0-

cz L L cz

c4 I ---.- br*co

0 c , l 3 , ~ 0 0 x 1 2 0 0 x 1 0 0 C I , C < D 7 0 0 x 700X SO

GI B H - 9 5 O x 4 0 0 x 1 9 X 3 6 GZ B H - 8 0 0 X 3 0 0 X I 6 X Z 8

F i g . 6 Analys is o b j e c t

1 iw

F i g . 7 Thermal stress development F i g . 8 Thermal stress development (Column) (Beam)

INTERFLAM '88 PAGE 184

Page 7: Structural fire protection in Japan

C a l c u l a t e d r e s u l t s

F i g s . 7 - 9. t e m p e r a t u r e a t t h e t o p of a column is 520 - 570"C, and t h a t a t t h e c e n t e r o f beam i t is 150 - 190°C. ( t he t e m p e r a t u r e a t which t h e c u r v a t u r e e x c e e d s 10 times y i e l d c u r v a t u r e a t room t e m e p r a t u r e ) of a column i s o v e r 600"C, and t h a t of beam is 420°C.

R e s u l t s of a n a l y s i s f o r t h e @ - @' f r ame are shown i n From these r e s u l t s , it c a n b e s e e n t h a t t h e y i e l d

The p l a s t i c h i n g e t e m p e r a t u r e

D e f l e c t i o n c r i te r ia used h e r e are L2/800H f o r beams and h/30 f o r columns, where L , H and h are beam l e n g t h , beam h e i g h t and column h e i g h t , r e s p e c t i v e l y . From F i g . 9 , it c a n b e s e e n t h a t columns and o u t e r beams do n o t r e a c h t h e d e f l e c t i o n c r i t e r i o n a t 600°C, b u t i n n e r beam r e a c h a t 590°C.

~

c z 2""

B

T*mn'rr,"r* L

F i g . 9 Defo rma t ion

4 ) D e t e r m i n a t i o n of f i r e p r o t e c t i o n t h i c k n e s s

impor t ance o f t h e b u i l d i n g , s o e v a l u a t i o n c r i te r ia a l s o va ry . F i r e p r o t e c t i o n t h i c k n e s s depending on e a c h c r i t e r i o n are as f o l l o w s .

The g o a l f o r f i r e r e s i s t a n c e v a r i e s a c c o r d i n g t o t h e

column beam Based on p l a s t i c h i n g e t e m p e r a t u r e 5mm 50mm Based on d e f l e c t i o n c r i te r ia 5mm 3 5mm Based on t r a d i t i o n a l r e g u l a t i o n s

Uppermost t o 4 t h s t o r i e s f rom t h e uppermost s t o r y 3 0 m m 2 5mm 5 t h t o 1 4 t h s tor ies from t h e

15th o r more s t o r i e s from t h e uppermost s t o r y 40mm 3 5mm

uppermost s t o r y 50mm 4 5mm

INTERFLAM '88 PAGE 185

Page 8: Structural fire protection in Japan

4 . Conclusion

s t r u c t u r a l f i r e p r o t e c t i o n i n Japan . I n t h e example of d e s i g n , w e on ly inc luded c a l c u l a t i o n of p r e d i c t e d behav io r . For p r a c t i c a l d e s i g n , it i s n e c e s s a r y t o se t t h e a p p r o p r i a t e g o a l f o r f i r e re- s i s t a n c e f o r e a c h b u i l d i n g , t a k i n g i n t o accoun t t h e a p p r o p r i a t e s a fe ty f a c t o r s .

We have mainly i n t r o d u c e d new d e s i g n r e g u l a t i o n s f o r

Acknowledgements

T h i s paper is p a r t l y e x t r a c t e d from t h e r e s u l t s o f t h e development group f o r f i re p r o t e c t i o n of b u i l d i n g s t r u c t u r e s (Chairman P r o f . H. S a i t o ) and development group o f systematic des ign method f o r o v e r a l l f i r e s a f e t y (Chairman P r o f . K . Kawagoe) i n t h e r e s e a r c h p r o j e c t , "Development of Design System f o r Bu i ld ign F i r e S a f e t y , " sponsored by t h e M i n i s t r y o f C o n s t r u c t i o n . wish t o thank t h e members concerned.

The a u t h o r s

Refe rences

1. "Development of d e s i g n method f o r f i r e r e s i s t a n c e of b u i l d i n g s t r u c t u r e s " , Bu i ld ing Research I n s t i t u t e , 1987.3 ( I n Japanese )

"Development of s y s t e m a t i c d e s i g n method f o r o v e r a l l f i r e s a f e t y " , B u i l d i n g Research I n s t i t u t e , 1987.3 ( I n Japanese )

2.

INTERFLAM '88 PAGE 186