14
Struggling for Social Inclusion – a Tale of Uzbekistan

Struggling for Social Inclusion

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Struggling for Social Inclusion – a Tale of Uzbekistan

Content

• Why we are not in? Statistics

• Perceptions: Changing minds

• Accessible environment: Breaking barriers

• Promoting rights• Integration through

work• Future steps &

new priorities• CoP expectations

Are we invisible? Statistics

• 677 000 of PwD (about 2,3 % of general population), 100.000 are children

• 6 259 adults, 1 300 children live in specialized institutions, 8 000 get home help

• 17 890 study in boarding schools, 10 825 at home and 1500 at 4 specialized colleges

• 34 000 working aged • 2500 (about 7 %) work in specialized enterprises • 7500 (3 356 women) are employed at reserved

working places

Changing minds: national PR campaign

Raising public awareness

79

62

39

23

8

22

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

charity approach medical approach inclusive approach

2008 Year

2010 Year

Breaking barriers

Promoting rights

Resolution of Cabinet of Ministers on penalties and suspension of activities

for organizations which violate legislation on employment,

accessibility andSocial protection of persons with

disabilities №1/05.1.2011

Enhancing opportunities

Enhancing opportunities

• 5 Clubs for PwD looking for a job (84 training events, 25 celebrations)

• Clubs members 478 PwD• 421 PwD were employed with assistance

of ACCESS (clubs + EPC)• Rate of annually employed PwD increased

from 2200 till 6200/7800• 10 Social Enterprises

What makes are special

• Upstream and downstream linkages: policy advice plus grassroots intervention

• Government in the driving seat: The first campaign of UNDP broadcasted on national TV, banners,

• How to blend of poverty reduction with democratic governance

• Rod not fish: Catering, promo materials • Changing from within: ramp, braille business cards• From entry point-> strategic scale up (SP)

Future steps & new priorities

• Gender & disability mainstreaming in policy making

• Providing transparent and participatory decision making

• Widening social services through CSOs involvement

• Scaling up social enterprises

CoP expectations Networking of regional governmental

officers and UNDP disability focal points for knowledge and information sharing

• Regional projects on social entrepreneurship

• Regional researches/reports on disability issues

Marry GIM with Social entrepreneurship

Welcome to Tashkent CoP

in 2012!