Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Student perspectives on a
flipped OB course
at course completion
and 2-3 years later
Doug Schirch
BCCE July 2018
Chem 103, Chemistry & Health:
survey of organic and biochemistry
for 1st-year nursing students, 27-44 students
Changing student demographics:In past 14 years the mix of students has
been evolving to include:
• more 1st-generation college students
• more commuter students
Has meant more students struggling
Goals for flipping my OB course:
• Fewer students finish with DFW grades
• Overall class learning doesn’t decrease
• Student approval
• After course students will be
• better prepared to succeed in other courses
• more likely to graduate.
June 2014 conference in Denver:
my introduction to “flipping” a course.
Goals for flipping my OB course:
• Fewer students finish with DFW grades
• Overall class learning doesn’t decrease
• Student approval
• After course students will be
• better prepared to succeed in other courses
• more likely to graduate.
√√
√
June 2014 conference in Denver:
my introduction to “flipping” a course.
Use of classroom time1. Answer questions. Announcements (1-2 min.)
2. Check pre-class preparation
• Check their notes on assigned videos. Done during
their group problem-solving. (~5-10 sec.)
• Mon & Fri: “Memorization quiz” on content for that
day (~5 min.)
3. Group work, with expert assistance (~40 min.)
• 2015: Assigned end-of-chapter homework
• 2016: My worksheets (HW + more problems)
• 2018: Revised worksheets: in-class + post-class
4. Testing: Wed. quiz on past 3 sessions. (~10 min.)
Trend in DFW grades
0%
15%
30%
45%
`08 `09 `10 `11 `12 `13 `14 `15 `16 `17 `18
% o
f C
lass
Year
W
F
D/D+
X
Traditional Flipped
Students with DFW Grades Each Year
Trend in DFW grades
0%
15%
30%
45%
`08 `09 `10 `11 `12 `13 `14 `15 `16 `17 `18
% o
f C
lass
Year
W
F
D/D+
X
Traditional Flipped
Students with DFW Grades Each Year
Began Study Groups
Class performance after flipping
1070 10641075
1003
1087
993984
10141000
1040
40.0
45.0
50.0
55.0
60.0
65.0
70.0
75.0
Sp08 SP09 Sp10 Sp11 Sp12 Sp13 Sp14 Sp15 Sp16 Sp18
800
850
900
950
1000
1050
1100
1150
Med
ian
AC
S Fi
nal
Exa
m
Semester
Ave
. SAT
*
Ave SAT Scores Mean ACS Final
Flipped
* ~25% of class has no SAT/ACT* ~25% of class has no SAT/ACT
1070 10641075
1003
1087
993984
10141000
1040
40.0
45.0
50.0
55.0
60.0
65.0
70.0
75.0
Sp08 SP09 Sp10 Sp11 Sp12 Sp13 Sp14 Sp15 Sp16 Sp18
800
850
900
950
1000
1050
1100
1150
Med
ian
AC
S Fi
nal
Exa
m
Semester
Ave
. SAT
*
Ave SAT Scores Mean ACS Final
Flipped
* ~25% of class has no SAT/ACT
Class performance after flipping
End-of-course SurveyAverage weekly time spent on course outside of class
2013 2015 2016 2018
Class average 5.9 hrs 9.1 hrs 10.1 hrs 7.8 hrs
Class median 5.0 hrs 8.0 hrs 8.8 hrs 7.0 hrs
Ave. of 5 lowest resp. 2.1 hrs 4.5 hrs 4.2 hrs 3.0 hrs
How often did you rewatch lecture videos?
“Of every 10 videos I watched, I would rewatch on average …
None 1 of the videos
2 videos
3-5 videos
6 or more
Responses (n=97 of 102 students, 2015, ‘16, ‘18)
25%(24)
22%(21)
32% (31)
13% (13)
8% (8)
75%21%
Survey: Preferred Course Flipped?“… I preferredthe switch, having videos of the lectures and doing homework in class.”
Stronglydisagree Disagree Neutral Agree
Strongly Agree
AVERAGE[Scale =
1-5]
2015 (n=24 of 26 students)
17%(4)
4%(1)
17% (4)
13% (3)
50% (12)
3.8
2016(n=41 of 42) 2%(1)
7%(3)
5% (2)
12% (5)
73% (30)
4.5
2018(n=32 of 34) 3%(1)
3%(1)
9% (3)
25% (8)
59% (19)
4.3
Improved Study Skills for future?“… I improved my skills for studying and learning in ways that I think help me with other courses.”
Stronglydisagree Disagree Neutral Agree
Strongly
Agree
AVERAGE[Scale = 1-
5]
2015 (n=24 of 26 students)
8%(2)
- 8%(2)
46% (11)
38%(9)
4.0
2016 (n=41 of 42)
- 2%(1)
17%(7)
29% (12)
51%(21)
4.3
2018 (n=32 of 34)
- 6%(2)
22%(7)
44% (14)
28%(9)
3.9
Overall Course Evaluation
“Overall, I rate this course as excellent.”
Stronglydisagree Disagree Neutral Agree
Strongly Agree
AVERAGE[Scale =
1-5]
2013 (26) - 4% 27% 35% 35% 4.0
2014 (23) - 4% 43% 17% 35% 3.8
2015 (24) - - 8% 38% 54% 4.5
2016 (41) - 7% 20% 15% 59% 4.2
2016 (41) 6% - 6% 19% 69% 4.4
2018 Survey of ‘15 & ‘16 Students
1. Did the course help you
– adjust to the increased workloads of college
courses?
– with new study strategies?
• and did they help you in later courses?
2. Other comments?
3. Grade in course? Current major?
Response rate: 27-31 of 67 students (40-46%)
2018 survey of ‘15 & ‘16 students
Stronglydisagree
Disagree Neitheragree nordisagree
Agree Stronglyagree
0%
25%
50%
Did the course help you adjust to the
increased workloads of college courses,
compared to the workloads for courses in
high school?
2018 survey of ‘15 & ‘16 students
Stronglydisagree
Disagree Neitheragree nordisagree
Agree Stronglyagree
0%
20%
40%
60%
Did the course help you with new study
strategies that you hadn’t used before?
2018 survey of ‘15 & ‘16 students
Stronglydisagree
Disagree Neitheragreenor
disagree
Agree Stronglyagree
0%
25%
50%Aftercourse
2018: 2-3yrs later
Did any new study strategies help
you in other college courses?
Stronglydisagree
Disagree Neitheragreenor
disagree
Agree Stronglyagree
0%
25%
50%Aftercourse
2018: 2-3yrs later
Did any new study strategies help
you in other college courses?Most from students no longer in nursing and/or got grade <A
2018 survey of ‘15 & ‘16 students
Stronglydisagree
Disagree Neitheragreenor
disagree
Agree Stronglyagree
0%
25%
50%Aftercourse
2018: 2-3yrs later
2018 survey of ‘15 & ‘16 students
Did any new study strategies help
you in other college courses?
Stronglydisagree
Disagree Neitheragreenor
disagree
Agree Stronglyagree
0%
25%
50%Aftercourse
2018: 2-3yrs later
Did any new study strategies help
you in other college courses?
7 of 10 comments
mention
memorizing/rewriting
notes.
2018 survey of ‘15 & ‘16 students
Summary of most frequent student comments
Type of comment Freq.
Class practice and/or study groups helpful 8
Lectures as videos helpful 7
2018 survey of ‘15 & ‘16 students
Summary of most frequent student comments
Type of comment Freq.
Memorization quizzes helpful 8
Class practice and/or study groups helpful 8
Lectures as videos helpful 7
Helped with time management 4
Was a lot of work, but worth it 3
Appreciated instructor made sure notes taken 3
Was skeptical at first, but worked 2
2018 survey of ‘15 & ‘16 students
Motivation for memorization quizzes
What we’ve learned from cognitive
psychology about faulty study
techniques favored by students, versus
techniques proven effective.
• “Fluency illusions.” Rereading
notes doesn’t work, and deceives
students about what they “know.”
• What works: frequent retrieval
practice.
– Also: Cornell note-taking method. Includes: cover your
notes and give as much as you can from memory.
Motivation for memorization quizzes
Rationale:
• Rote memorization not end goal.
• These a small part of final grade.
• But the higher-order thinking required for:
o naming organic compounds
o predicting reaction products
o answering questions about biochemical
processes
o etc.
can’t be done without having memorized
key info.
Sample “Memorization Quiz”• In class: each student gets blank paper and must reproduce this.• Posted on Moodle. Removes ‘guessing’ what will be tested.
Graded to force mastery:
Double ptsdeducted for errors.
Sample “Memorization Quiz”• In class: each student gets blank paper and must reproduce this.• Posted on Moodle. Removes ‘guessing’ what will be tested.
Graded to force mastery:
Double ptsdeducted for errors.
Sample “Memorization Quiz”• In class: each student gets blank paper and must reproduce this.• Posted on Moodle. Removes ‘guessing’ what will be tested.
Graded to force mastery:
Double ptsdeducted for errors.
Sample “Memorization Quiz”• In class: each student gets blank paper and must reproduce this.• Posted on Moodle. Removes ‘guessing’ what will be tested.
Graded to force mastery:
Double ptsdeducted for errors.
Sample “Memorization Quiz”• In class: each student gets blank paper and must reproduce this.• Posted on Moodle. Removes ‘guessing’ what will be tested.
Graded to force mastery:
Double ptsdeducted for errors.
No complaints!
Students more likely to graduate?
Students more likely to graduate?
2009 – 2014(n = 188)
2015 – 2016(n = 69)
Dropped out or transferred within a year of course
26%
Had GPA <2.5 anddropped out
16%
Students more likely to graduate?
2009 – 2014(n = 188)
2015 – 2016(n = 69)
Dropped out or transferred within a year of course
26% 29%
Had GPA <2.5 anddropped out
16% 13%
Recognition
– June 2014 conference
– Invitation for BCCE presentation
• Goshen College Faculty Development Funds
Questions?
email: [email protected]