Upload
kalen-shewan
View
21
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Running Head: BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY
Burnout, Adaptiveness, and Personal Identity in the Restaurant Industry
Kalen Shewan
York University
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 1
Abstract
The current study examined adaptiveness and Eudaimonic Well-Being as they related to
occupational burnout amongst employees currently employed within full-service restaurants.
Data was obtained for 30 male, 69 female and 1 gender neutral individual (N = 100), ranging in
age from 18 to 60 years old, working in various restaurant occupations. This survey included the
Personal Functioning Inventory (PFI), the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being (QEWB),
and the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI). Results of stepwise multiple regression indicated
adaptiveness and EWB as having significant and negative associations with burnout. While
adaptiveness was found to be the stronger predictor of burnout, adaptiveness and EWB were
found to relate significantly to different components of burnout.
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 2
Introduction
Working in the restaurant industry requires exposure to numerous, repetitive, and
unpredictable sources of stress. Cooks and waiters, for example, have been classified as high job
strain occupations which carry physiological and psychological costs (Schnall et al., 1990;
Kjaerheim et al., 1997).
Sources of occupational stress in the restaurant industry have been shown to include:
work overload (Murray-Gibbons & Gibbons, 2007; Hayes & Weathington, 2007), repetitive
physical strain and demanding work conditions (Pratten, 2003), unsociable working hours with
low wages (Pratten, 2003), customer incivility (Hunter & Penney, 2014; Han, Bonn, & Cho,
2016), emotional labour (Lucas & Deery, 2004; Erickson, 2004), sexual harassment and
exploitation (Seymour, 2000), and bullying (Mathisen, Einarsen, & Mykletun, 2008). The
accumulated impact of stressors employees experience in the food service and hospitality
industry can lead to what has been referred to as work-related burnout.
Burnout, Exhaustion, and Disengagement
Burnout has been most commonly described as a work-related syndrome characterized by
exhaustion, cynicism, and reduced personal efficacy (Maslach, Jackson, & Leiter, 1997). More
recent research has identified exhaustion and disengagement as the core characteristics of
burnout whereas the relationship with personal efficacy has been found to be much weaker
(Maslach, Schaufeli, & Leiter, 2001; Shirom, 2003). Exhaustion is defined as the result of
physical, cognitive, and emotional strain whereas disengagement refers to distancing one’s self
mentally and emotionally from work tasks and feelings of cynicism towards one’s job in general
(Demerouti, Bakker, Vardakou, & Kantas, 2003). Burnout, then, is better defined as a state of
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 3
strong detachment from work accompanied by physical and emotional exhaustion (Demerouti,
Mostert, & Bakker, 2010; Halbesleben, & Demerouti, 2005). Higher levels of burnout in food
service employees have been associated with greater incidence of treatment for depression and
chronic diseases (Beer, Pienaar, & Rothmann, 2014), higher turnover intentions (Han, Bonn, &
Cho, 2016), customer-directed counter-productive work behaviour (Hunter & Penney, 2014),
decreased life satisfaction (Hayes & Weathington, 2007) and greater absence duration from work
(Bakker, Demerouti, de Boer, & Schaufeli, 2003). The literature on occupational stress clearly
identifies burnout as a common problem within the restaurant industry and effectively coping
with the broad range of stressors in restaurant occupations has been related to the mental and
physical health of these employees (Kjaerheim et al., 1997; Pienaar & Willemse, 2008).
Adaptiveness
Coping skills have been identified as helpful to restaurant employees in lowering stress
and preventing burnout (Pienaar & Willemse, 2008). Recent reviews of the vast amount of
coping literature have found a general consensus that coping is a dynamic process that aims to
reduce or eliminate the costs associated with stress (Folkman & Moskowitz, 2004; Compas et al.,
2001). Furthermore, it is generally agreed that the effectiveness of coping strategies is context
specific and the ability to adapt different modes of coping to a given situation is associated with
more favourable outcomes (Folkman & Moskowitz, 2004; Compas et al., 2001). This context
specific coping has been termed flexible or adaptive coping and refers to the ability to utilize
different coping strategies and adjust the method of coping depending on how stress unfolds
(Taylor & Sirois, 2014). Adaptive coping has been associated with better adjustment and greater
adaptation, fewer negative health consequences, and positive affective outcomes (Taylor &
Stanton, 2007).
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 4
The ability to engage in different modes of coping to effectively adapt to stress has also
been conceptualized as the trait of ’adaptiveness’ (Kohn, et al., 2003). The construct of
adaptiveness describes an individual’s ability to consistently engage in forms of coping that are
most appropriate to a given stressor (Kohn, et al., 2003). Adaptiveness in the work setting then,
can be conceptualized as a factor that helps to minimize the impact of stress caused by particular
job demands. Restaurant employees higher in adaptiveness could be expected to fare better in
terms of reducing burnout and based on this assumption, the following hypothesis is made:
Hypothesis 1: The trait of adaptiveness is significantly and negatively associated with burnout
Interestingly, while coping skills have been shown to be effective in dealing with
burnout, they were shown to not necessarily be sufficient for creating engagement (Pienaar &
Willemse, 2008; Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004; Kim, Shin, & Swanger, 2009) and burnout was not
found to have a strong link to low levels of performance (Bakker, Demerouti, & Verbeke, 2004).
Furthermore, emotional exhaustion – considered a central facet of burnout – did not prevent
employees from remaining fully engaged in their work. (Demerouti, Verbeke, and Bakker,
2005). These findings imply that being able to cope with the demands of work is a necessary but
insufficient condition for preventing burnout as it does not fully account for both exhaustion and
disengagement components. With regards to adaptiveness, then, the following hypothesis is also
made:
Hypothesis 2: The trait of adaptiveness has a stronger negative association with the
exhaustion dimension of burnout than with the disengagement dimension of burnout
Given the association between coping and burnout, it seems there are other factors that
can better explain the withdrawal and cynical detachment from work. Xanthopolou, Bakker,
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 5
Demerouti, and Schaufeli (2009) identified involvement of the self is an important pre-requisite
for preventing detachment from work and creating engagement. Erickson (2004) also noted this
occurrence within the restaurant industry, finding that employees who invest in their job view the
work to be a part of who they are instead of a role they are simply filling on a daily basis.
Eudaimonic Identity Theory (Waterman, 1993, 2005, 2008, 2010) is helpful in explaining this
phenomenon as it specifically concerns itself with how individuals identify with activities and
form personal commitments to them.
Eudaimonic Identity and Well-Being
Eudaimonic Identity Theory (EIT) was developed by Waterman and colleagues (1993,
2005, 2008, 2010, 2013) to explain how identity choices and commitments are formed in
emerging adulthood and maintained throughout the lifespan. EIT draws upon Aristotle’s
Nichomachean Ethics as a philosophical foundation and, specifically, the concept of the
‘daimon’ – or the ‘true self’ – and the subjective experience of eudaimonia (Waterman, 1993).
Eudaimonia is defined as the subjective experience one has when engaging in activities deemed
to be personally expressive, meaningful and in accordance with what is perceived to be the ‘true
self’ (Waterman, 1993). The experience of eudaimonia was found to be strongly and positively
associated with feelings of competence, investment of considerable effort, concentration,
assertiveness, a sense of clear goals, and knowing how well one is doing (Waterman, 1993).
Feelings of personal expression and the experience of eudaimonia are thought to serve as means
to make the ‘best’ choices for one’s self and creating healthy and enduring well-being through a
cohesive identity commitment (Waterman et al., 2013). EIT posits that there are better or worse
choices for people to make regarding the activities they commit to (Waterman et al., 2013) and
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 6
that these should best express “...who they are, what they value, and what they do in their lives”
(Waterman et al., 2010).
The quality of life derived from engaging in pursuit of meaningful, personally expressive,
and self-concordant goals is referred to as Eudaimonic Well-Being (EWB) (Waterman et al.,
2010). EWB has been shown to be a reliable and valid indicator of quality of identity
commitment and its related outcomes (Waterman et al., 2010). Creating successful identity
commitments and taking actions that are in line with the ‘true self’ generate higher levels of
EWB and have been shown to be positively associated with subjective well-being, psychological
well-being, self-esteem, and internal locus of control and negatively associated with general
anxiety, social anxiety, and depression (Waterman et al., 2013). These indicators of
psychosocial function are known to be closely related to the stress experience (Folkman &
Moskowitz, 2004) and therefore, the success with which individuals have in obtaining and acting
out a cohesive identity helps to contend with stress, minimize burnout, and find opportunities for
self-expression. EWB, then, could be expected to play a significant role in how successful
employees are at identifying with job tasks, engaging in work, and thereby, minimizing burnout.
Thus, the current study proposes the following hypothesis with regards to restaurant industry
employees:
Hypothesis 3: EWB is significantly and negatively associated with burnout
Given the strong theoretical links to identity and engagement, EWB could be expected to
complement adaptiveness in preventing burnout by way of maintaining or increasing
engagement with one’s work. How successful an individual has been at deriving meaning and
identifying with their work may help prevent burnout by fulfilling motivation and interest
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 7
requirements and preventing disengagement. This success, Waterman and colleagues (2010)
state, is reflected in one’s general level of EWB. Thus, it is proposed in the current study:
Hypothesis 4: EWB has a stronger negative association with the disengagement dimension of
burnout than with the exhaustion dimension of burnout
The fast-paced and demanding environments found in full-service restaurants offer a
unique opportunity to study the factors associated with burnout. The literature on burnout shows
that restaurant occupations inherently contain a large and varied number of stressors requiring
adaptable coping skills and personal resilience in order to thrive. The constructs of adaptiveness
and EWB are hypothesized here as possible factors that can mitigate the costs associated with
job demands and help prevent burnout in restaurant occupations.
The Current Study
The current study aims to contribute to the understanding of burnout as it occurs in the
restaurant industry. This study specifically focuses on the ‘full-service’ classification of
restaurants which are described as “...establishments primarily engaged in providing food
services to patrons who order and are served while seated and pay after eating. These
establishments may sell alcoholic beverages, provide take-out services, operate a bar or present
live entertainment, in addition to serving food and beverage” (StatsCan, 2012, p.455). It is
within the full-service setting that it is possible to see the range and effect of job demands in the
restaurant industry.
.
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 8
Method
Participants
The final sample used in the current study included 100 individuals, 18 to 60 years of age
currently employed in full-service restaurants within Canada and the United States. The social
media platforms, Facebook and LinkedIn, were used to recruit participants via general posts to
restaurant-related groups as well as through contacting individuals who identified themselves as
working in a restaurant. The general posts and messages contained a request for volunteers,
short description of the study, a link to the online survey, and a request to re-post or share the
link with others that work in full-service restaurants. No incentives were used to recruit
participants and surveys were completed on a purely voluntary basis.
The original obtained convenience sample included 196 respondents recruited from all
online sources. Of the 196 respondents, 120 completed surveys were submitted for a completion
rate of 61%. 20 surveys were excluded from analysis due to missing or incomplete data to give a
final sample size of N = 100 respondents. Of the 100 respondents included in the final analysis,
30 were male, 69 female, and one gender neutral. Age was divided into categorical ranges and
the respondents indicated which bracket they fell within. This was done for ease of data
collection via the online survey and to create categories for comparison of burnout levels. In
years old, these categories were: 18 to 20, 21 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, and 60 to 65.
Unfortunately, this method did not provide complete descriptive data of the sample age – mean
and median ages – but the mode of this group is reported to be in the 30 to 39 year old range
(n=36) with the next most frequent group being the 21 to 29 range (n=32) and no individuals
reported being in the 60 to 65 range.
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 9
With regards to job description, respondents identified their particular role from a list of
job positions most often found within full-service restaurants. These job titles included: server,
bartender, host, busser, food runner, line/prep cook, dishwasher and manager/supervisor. These
were then separated into larger occupational groups that form the common division of labour
within full-service restaurants. ‘Front-of-the-House’ (FOH) included: servers, bartenders, hosts,
bussers, and food-runners while ‘Back-of-the-House’ represented all line/prep cooks and
dishwashers. Managers, Supervisors, and related positions like owners were given their own
category due to the qualitative difference in responsibility. Of the occupational groups
identified, 60 respondents were FOH employees, 9 were BOH and 31 were management.
Procedure
The current study was carried out using an online survey composed of three
questionnaires along with additional demographic questions for 73 items in total; 70 of which
were included in the final analysis. Online completion statistics indicated that most respondents
took between 10 to 20 minutes to complete the survey. This survey was generated and
distributed using the website, www.surveymonkey.com, which allowed for randomization of
questionnaire pages in order to reduce bias and any ordering effects that may occur if the
questionnaires were always presented in the same order.
Participants were invited to click on a link via Facebook or LinkedIn which took them to
the informed consent form of the survey. After reading the informed consent document,
participants were informed that by clicking on a button labelled ‘Continue’ they were implying
their consent to participate in the study and that they have read and understood the informed
consent form. They were also instructed at that point, if they chose not to participate, they could
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 10
simply close the survey’s browser window. Clicking on the ‘Continue’ button commenced the
survey and respondents had as much time as they needed to respond to all 73 items. Upon
completion, participants were shown a personal thank you for participating and taken to a
debriefing page which gave a description of the methods, concepts, and purpose of the study.
Once data collection was completed, responses were filtered to include only individuals
with completed surveys and this data was then exported into Microsoft Excel 2007. The
completed surveys were then inspected for missing data and the respondents with skipped or
missing items eliminated from the final data set. The final data set was analyzed using IBM
SPSS v.27
Measures
The three self-report questionnaires used in the current study were: The Personal
Functioning Inventory (Kohn et al., 2003), The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being
(Waterman et al., 2010), and the English translation of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory
(Halbesleben & Demerouti, 2005; Demerouti, Vardakou, & Kantas, 2003). Six demographic
questions were also originally included in the survey for a total of 73 items. The demographic
questions asked respondents about: age, gender, job title, employment arrangement with regards
to hours and pay, enrolment status in school, and education level all of which were responded to
using multiple choice options. The demographic questions concerning employment
arrangement, enrolment status, and education level were later deemed impertinent to the goals of
the current study. As a result, these were dropped from the final analysis so that only age,
gender and job title were included as demographic variables.
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 11
The Personal Functioning Inventory (PFI) (Kohn et al., 2003a) is a 30-item self-report
questionnaire designed to measure the construct of adaptiveness in respondents. The PFI asks
respondents to indicate on a 5-point Likert scale – ranging from 1 = “Strongly Disagree” to 5 =
“Strongly Agree” – how much they agree that each statement reflects their own approach to
personal problems (Kohn et al, 2003b). A sample item found on the PFI is: “I rarely permit
criticism to make me angry” (Kohn et al., 2003b, p. 2). The PFI also includes an equal number
of reverse scored, anti-trait items which are contraindicative of adaptiveness – ie. “Under
pressure I tend to make hasty decisions” (Kohn et al., 2003b, p. 2). The PFI was shown through
a series of three studies by Kohn et al. (2003a), to have high construct validity and convergent
validity via significant positive relationships with other measures of coping flexibility, self-rated
adaptiveness, and problem-solving as well as significant negative correlation with indicators of
perceived stress (Kohn et al., 2003a). Discriminant validity was also established through
comparison to a measure of abstract curiosity which was found to be unrelated to adaptiveness
(Kohn, et al., 2003a). Alpha reliabilities for the item-selection sample and cross-replication
sample were .92 and .89 (p<.01 for both), respectively, showing good internal consistency (Kohn
et al., 2003). Test-retest reliability over a three-week interval was high at .90 (p<.01) which the
authors contend supports the PFI as being a trait measure of adaptiveness.
Another measure utilized in the current study was the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic
Well-Being (QEWB) which was designed to assess the “level of eudaimonic functioning” (p.44),
- referring to EWB - in its’ respondents (Waterman et al., 2010). The 21-item QEWB contains
items related to subjective experiences of eudaimonia as well as behaviours reflecting active
pursuit of personally concordant goals (Waterman et al., 2010). There are 14 items in the
questionnaire which are positively framed and imply presence of EWB – ie. “I usually know
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 12
what I should do because some actions just feel right to me” (Waterman et al., 2010, p. 49).
There are also 7 negatively framed items which are reverse scored and imply absence of EWB –
ie. “As yet, I’ve not figured out what to do with my life” (Waterman et al., 2010, p. 49).
Respondents are instructed to indicate on a 5-point Likert scale – ranging from 0 = “Strongly
Disagree” to 4 = “Strongly Agree” – the extent they feel each statement reflects how their life
has been going in general (Waterman et al.,, 2010).
Construct validity for the QEWB was established by showing a strong, significant
association to measures of self-esteem, internal locus of control, and significant negative
relationship with measures of general anxiety, social anxiety and depression (Waterman et al.,
2010). The QEWB was found to have strong convergent validity with indicators of identity
commitment, psychological well-being, and subjective well-being while showing strong
discriminant validity from indicators of identity exploration and negative association with
ruminative exploration, which is a detrimental form of identity status (Waterman et al., 2010).
Incremental validity was also shown for the QEWB as measuring a form of well-being that
contributes a unique portion of variance above and beyond both subjective well-being and
psychological well-being (Waterman et al., 2010). Cronbach’s alpha was .86 for sample 1
and .85 for sample 2 showing adequate internal consistency (Waterman et al., 2010). No test-
retest reliability data was provided for the QEWB.
Finally, the third measure included in this study was the English translation of the
Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) (Halbesleben & Demerouti, 2005; Demerouti et al., 2003).
The 16-item OLBI was designed to measure general traits of burnout across occupational fields
and includes two sub-scale dimensions; one relating to exhaustion and one to disengagement
(Halbesleben & Demerouti, 2005). The items of the OLBI are designed to reflect both subscales
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 13
using positively and negatively worded items for both exhaustion and disengagement – 8 items
each (Halbesleben & Demerouti, 2005). Respondents indicate how much they agree or disagree
with each statement using a 4-point Likert scale – ranging from 1=”Strongly Agree to
4=”Strongly Disagree” (Halbesleben & Demerouti, 2005). A sample item of the OLBI relating
to exhaustion would be: “During my work, I often feel emotionally drained” (Demerouti, 1999).
A sample item of the OLBI pertaining to disengagement would be: “I always find new and
interesting aspects in my work” (Demerouti, 1999).
Cronbach’s alpha for several samples used to test the OLBI was found to be between .74
and .87 indicating acceptable internal consistency for the OLBI across diverse occupational
groups (Halbesleben & Demerouti, 2005). Test-retests were found by Halbesleben and
Demerouti (2005) to be moderately correlated (r=.51, p<.001, for exhaustion; r=.34, p<.01, for
disengagement), which the authors state supports the general stability of the OLBI over time.
Halbesleben and Demerouti (2005) established strong construct and discriminant validity for the
OLBI through multi-trait method comparison with the Maslach Burnout Inventory – General
Survey (MBI-GS) which has been considered the gold standard in burnout measurement despite
problematic psychometric properties due to the lack of both positively and negatively framed
items (Demerouti et al., 2003; Halbesleben & Demerouti, 2004; Bakker & Demerouti, 2008). It
was shown that the OLBI and MBI-GS measure common aspects of burnout but also contribute
unique variance by additionally measuring different facets of burnout (Demerouti et al., 2003).
Furthermore, the OLBI has advantages in that it does not suffer from the same psychometric
weaknesses as the MBI-GS and is more generalizable across occupations and industries
(Demerouti et al., 2003; Bakker & Demerouti, 2008).
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 14
Analysis
Analysis of the final data set (N = 100) in this study was performed using step-wise
multiple regression to compare the predictor variables of adaptiveness and EWB to the criterion
variable of burnout. Separate stepwise multiple regressions were also performed to compare the
predictor variables to the exhaustion and disengagement subscales of the OLBI. These separate
regressions were performed to assess if adaptiveness or EWB were related to different facets of
burnout by way of stronger association with the different subscales. Cronbach’s alphas were
also determined for all scales and the subscales to ensure the questionnaires retained acceptable
internal consistency reliability within the current study.
Final demographic analysis focused on age range, gender, and job position variables. As
age was divided categorically into six ranges, a one way independent groups ANOVA was
performed to assess for significant differences between age groups with regards to perceived
burnout levels. Because none of the respondents indicated they were in the 60 to 65 years old
range, this category was dropped to give five independent groups for the final comparison. A
separate one-way, independent groups ANOVA was also performed to assess for differences in
burnout levels between the common restaurant occupational groups of FOH, BOH, and
management. As convenience sampling produced demographic groups of unequal sizes, tests for
homogeneity of variance using Levene’s test were of particular importance to ensure that the
comparisons being made between these groups could be reliably analyzed using one-way
ANOVAs. And finally, gender was analyzed using the Welch-Satterthwaite t-Test to compare
differences in perceived burnout between gender groups while accounting for different sample
sizes and potentially different variances. Due to only one individual indicating a neutral gender,
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 15
this category along with that particular participant’s data were not included in the gender
analysis.
Results
Descriptive Statistics, Intercorrelations, and Demographics
The means, standard deviations, and zero-order correlations for the PFI, QEWB, OLBI,
exhaustion subscale of the OLBI, and disengagement subscale of the OLBI are all displayed in
Table 1. Pearson’s r values were found to be significant to a level of p < .0005 (two-tailed) for
all zero-order correlations with the exceptions of the correlation between adaptiveness (PFI) and
disengagement as well as the correlation between EWB (QEWB) and exhaustion. These two
zero-order correlations still reached significance, but to a level of p < .01 (two-tailed).
Cronbach’s alpha reliabilities are also displayed in Table 1 and show adequate internal
consistency for all scales and subscales with values ranging from .79 to .90.
Table 1
Means, standard deviations, internal consistency reliability coefficients, and zero-order correlations for PFI, QEWB, OLBI, Exhaustion Subscale of the OLBI, and Disengagement Subscale of the OLBI
1 2 3 4 5
1) PFI - - - - -2) QEWB .353*** - - - -3) OLBI -.428*** -.383*** - - -4) exhaustion -.467*** -.261* .896*** - -5) disengagement -.308* -.426*** .905*** .623*** -M 109.53 57.77 39.66 19.66 20.00SD 14.99 9.53 6.87 3.73 3.90Cronbach’s α .899 .847 .864 .795 .791Note: N = 100; PFI = Personal Functioning Inventory; QEWB = Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being; OLBI = Oldenburg Burnout Inventory; exhaustion and disengagement are both subscales which form the complete OLBI*p< .01,**p< .001,***p< .0005 (two-tailed)
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 16
Table 1 shows adaptiveness and EWB, independent of one another, as having significant
negative associations of moderate strength with burnout and both of its components; exhaustion
and disengagement. The associations between adaptiveness and disengagement and between
EWB and exhaustion were somewhat weaker but, as mentioned, still reached significance.
With regards to the demographic variables, the group comparisons resulting from both
one way ANOVAs were found to be nonsignificant, implying that burnout characteristics do not
differ with age or occupation in a restaurant. Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance revealed
nonsignificant values for both one way ANOVAs which indicates that there was no violation of
homogeneity of variance for these groups despite the use of a convenience sampling and unequal
sample sizes. For gender, the results of a Welch-Satterthwaite t-Test – to account for different
sample sizes – were also found to be non-significant and, thus, no differences were detected in
burnout between males and females either.
Stepwise Multiple Regression Analysis
To test the relative contributions of adaptiveness and EWB to an overall model of
burnout, a stepwise multiple regression was performed for the criterion variable of burnout (M =
39.66, SD = 6.87) with adaptiveness (M = 109.53, SD = 14.99) and EWB (M= 57.77, SD = 9.53)
as predictors; the results of which are displayed in Table 2.
The results displayed in Table 2 show that both adaptiveness and EWB serve as
significant, negative predictors of burnout; thus supporting hypothesis 1 and 3. Including both
predictor variables in the model resulted in a medium effect size on burnout scores; accounting
for 24.5% of the total variability (R2 = .245, F (2,99) = 15.739, p < .0005). No hypothesis was
put forward as to the relative strength of the associations between the two predictor variables and
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 17
burnout. However, adaptiveness was found to account for a substantially larger proportion of the
variability in scores (ΔR2 = .183) - compared with EWB (ΔR2 = .062) - and represented the best
single predictor of burnout. Considering these findings, it is possible to construct a regression
equation using both adaptiveness and EWB as predictors of burnout as follows:
Burnout = 67.52 - .154(adaptiveness) - .191(EWB).
Table 2
Results of Stepwise Multiple Regression Models for Adaptiveness and Eudaimonic Well-Being as Predictor Variables of Burnout
Predictor B SE Β t p R2 Adjusted R2
SE R2
ΔR2 ΔF
1 .183 .175 6.24 .183 22.02**
(Constant) 61.17
4.63 - 13.22 <.0005**
Adaptiveness -.196 .042 -.428** -4.69 <.0005**
2 .245 .229 6.033
.062 7.91*
(Constant) 67.52
5.01 - 13.48 <.0005**
Adaptiveness -.154 .043 -.335** -3.55 .001**
EWB -.191 .068 -.265* -2.81 .006*
Note: N = 100; B = unstandardized regression coefficient; SE = standard error; β = standardized regression coefficient; t = obtained t-value; p = probability; R2 = proportion variance explained; SE R2 = standard error of the coefficient; ΔR2 = change in variance; ΔF = change in F*p< .01,**p< .001, ***p< .0005
It was also hypothesized in the current study that adaptiveness would serve as a better
predictor of the exhaustion component of burnout. EWB, on the other hand, was hypothesized to
have a stronger association with the disengagement component of burnout. To test these
hypotheses, a stepwise multiple regression was performed for the criterion variable of exhaustion
(M = 39.66. SD = 6.87). Using the predictor variables of adaptiveness (M = 109.53, SD = 14.99)
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 18
and EWB (M = 57.77, SD = 9.53), this analysis revealed adaptiveness to be the only significant,
and negative, contributor (t = -5.23, p < .0005) to this component of burnout. Thus, predicting
the exhaustion component of burnout may best be described by the equation:
Exhaustion = 32.397 - .116 (adaptiveness)
A stepwise multiple regression was then performed for the criterion variable of
disengagement (M = 20.00, SD = 3.90); again using the predictors of adaptiveness (M = 109.53,
SD = 14.99) and EWB (M = 57.77, SD = 9.53). Results of this analysis showed that adaptiveness
made no significant contribution to the variance in disengagement scores while EWB made a
significant negative contribution, t = -4.67, p < .0005. Therefore, the best available equation
drawn from these results for predicting disengagement would be:
Disengagement = 30.07 - .174 (EWB)
The findings of the latter two stepwise regressions lend strong support hypothesis 2 and 4
as well as to the concept of a multidimensional nature of burnout within the full-service
restaurant setting.
Discussion
The purpose of the current study was to investigate the relationship of adaptiveness and
eudaimonic well-being (EWB) to burnout amongst employees working in full-service
restaurants. Both adaptiveness and EWB were found to be negatively associated with burnout
supporting hypotheses 1 and 3. Adaptiveness, however, accounted for a much larger portion of
the variability in scores on the OLBI and, therefore, represented the best single predictor of
burnout. This indicates that while identity commitment may influence burnout, adaptiveness
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 19
seems to have greater predictive power for burnout in restaurant employees. EWB’s weaker
association with overall burnout may have to do with the fact that it is an indirect and general
measure of eudaimonic functioning and would include sources of personal expression and
meaning derived from all of life’s domains, not just work (Waterman et al., 2010).
The combined objective of hypotheses 2 and 4 was to determine whether adaptiveness
and EWB were related to different components of burnout. The findings of the current study
also supported both of these hypotheses, indicating that adaptability and EWB are differentially
related to exhaustion and disengagement, respectively. EWB’s negative relationship with the
disengagement dimension of burnout could indicate that a more specific process of commitment
to ‘work identity’ plays a role in creating engagement for employees. Studies investigating the
degree of identification with job-specific work tasks and the relationship to performance,
burnout, and engagement are warranted by the findings reported here. Furthermore, while EWB
was found to be significantly and negatively associated with disengagement, adaptiveness was
nonsignificant. On the other hand, adaptiveness was found to be negatively associated with
exhaustion but EWB was found to be nonsignificant. In other words the characteristics of
adaptiveness only have meaningful relationships with reduced exhaustion. Likewise, EWB and
the associated characteristics of personal meaning and expression within one’s work only have a
meaningful relationship to reduced disengagement or, conversely, promoting work engagement.
The findings of the current study suggest that different aspects of positive psychosocial
functioning are applicable to different facets of burnout. Furthermore, adaptiveness and EWB,
while both negatively associated with burnout, have discrete pathways through which they
operate to minimize its effects.
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 20
With regards to the mechanisms involved in reducing burnout, the cross-sectional design
of the current study limits assumptions. However, given the evidence on coping and identity
commitment within the available literature, it could be surmised that adaptiveness is involved in
preserving the homeostasis of personal function while identity commitment provides directions
for growth of that personal function. In this way, identity is given more opportunity for
expression by greater adaptability, and greater identity commitment allows for the narrowing of
coping and reduction of resource consumption when coping is already effective within particular
circumstances. This may further imply that burnout is low when the core of the self has been
well-defined but not made rigid in its application to life’s demands. This would create an
‘adaptive’ self; better able to find and/or create meaning in work tasks and effectively manage
the stress that is either directly or indirectly related to such tasks. In other words, adaptability
and identity commitment together help to create a strong, coherent sense of identity, personal
meaning and expression that is able to be engaged in any circumstances.
The positive psychosocial functioning one experiences with a greater ‘synthesized self’
(Schwartz et al.,2015; Waterman et al., 2013) would suggest that individuals having greater
identity commitment are better able to reduce stress or, at least engage in stress of their choosing
because it represents personally important and meaningful action. Likewise, greater identity
commitment could be presumed to allow for better identification of demands that are not in line
with the self, and, therefore, better minimize or avoid their associated costs. As such this
provides a narrowed scope of attentional focus to primarily those goals that are deemed to be
critical to a person’s identity and a more adaptive nature provides a better fit between these self-
concordant goals and the work environment.
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 21
Limitations
While support was found in the current study for all of the hypotheses and theorized
applications to burnout, these findings need must be applied with caution as there are several
limitations to be addressed. The first is the use of a convenience sampling method to obtain
participants. While this method was effective in collecting individuals for an online survey, it
did not address the issues of finding equal and randomized groups. There may have been a
degree of self-selection in those who chose to participate in the survey and so contributed to
some bias in the results and misrepresentation of the population of restaurant employees. While
it was shown through statistical testing that no violation of equal variances was found for the
demographic comparisons, it must be noted that there were large differences in the size of the
demographic groups with regards to age-range, and position. The exclusion of specific age data
– only grouped as age ranges – also limited the ability to do more fine-grained analysis of
differences in age and the ranges represented may have failed to provide meaningful
comparisons.
As already mentioned, another limitation of the current study is its’ cross-sectional
design. No interventions or experimental method were used and so assumptions that can be
made about the direction of causality amongst the variables are limited. It may be that it is
occupational characteristics that influence adaptiveness and provide opportunities for meaning
and self expression rather than a ‘person-environment fit’ that predicts burnout. Some recent
evidence suggests that this process proceeds in a reciprocal manner, not producing ‘gains’ but
determining how well an individual continues to identify and cope with work (Xanthopolou,
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 22
Bakker, Demerouti, & Schaufeli, 2009). Despite these limitations, it is posited here that
adaptiveness and possessing a higher level of EWB are essential factors in reducing burnout for
restaurant employees. The significant findings here warrant further investigation using
longitudinal studies to corroborate these relationships.
Conclusion
The findings of the current study indicate that discussion around reducing occupational
burnout and increasing engagement for restaurant employees would benefit from including both
coping skills and job identification as complementary factors in this process. Utilizing aspects of
adaptiveness and EWB provides a more nuanced approach to addressing burnout and
engagement issues for restaurant employees regardless of age, sex, or occupation. The
combination of adaptability with strong identity commitment could be expected to produce the
greatest general adjustment to ongoing stressors and provide fertile ground for the active
development of personal potentials. In the work setting, this translates into an employee who not
only deals well with the demands of their job, but who also identifies with their work and derives
personal meaning and purpose from what they do. As a result they not only avoid characteristics
of burnout, but also become engaged and personally invested in some or all aspects of their job.
These findings could help to guide policy, personal coping, and skill development interventions.
Furthermore, this study may prove a useful starting point if these results can be generalized to
other industries in order to design better workplaces and skill development plans for employees.
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 23
References
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development
International, 13(3), 209-223. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., de Boer, E., & Shaufeli, W. B. (2003). Job demands and job resources as
predictors of absence duration and frequency. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(2), 341-356.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00030-1
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Verbeke, W. (2004). Using the job demands-resources model to predict
burnout and performance. Human Resource Management, 43(1), 83-104.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20004
Beer, L. T., Pienaar, J., & Rothmann, S. (2014). Job burnout, work engagement and self‐reported
treatment for health conditions in south africa. Stress and Health: Journal of the International
Society for the Investigation of Stress, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smi.2576
Compas, B. E., Connor-Smith, J., Saltzman, H., Thomsen, A. H., & Wadsworth, M. E. (2001). Coping
with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and
research. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 87-127. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-
2909.127.1.87
Demerouti, E. (1999). Oldenburg Burnout Inventory [Database record]. Retrieved from PsycTESTS.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/t01688-000
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 24
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Vardakou, I., & Kantas, A. (2003). The convergent validity of two
burnout instruments: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. European Journal of Psychological
Assessment, 19(1), 12-23. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.19.1.12
Demerouti, E., Mostert, K., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Burnout and work engagement: A thorough
investigation of the independency of both constructs. Journal of Occupational Health
Psychology, 15(3), 209-222. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019408
Demerouti, E., Verbeke, W. J. M. I., & Bakker, A. B. (2005). Exploring the relationship between a
multidimensional and multifaceted burnout concept and self-rated performance. Journal of
Management, 31(2), 186-209. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206304271602
Erickson, K. (2004). To invest or detach? coping strategies and workplace culture in service work.
Symbolic Interaction, 27(4), 549-572. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.2004.27.4.549
Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2004). Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annual Review of Psychology,
55, 745-774. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456
Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Demerouti, E. (2005). The construct validity of an alternative measure of
burnout: Investigating the english translation of the oldenburg burnout inventory. Work & Stress,
19(3), 208-220. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02678370500340728
Han, S. J., Bonn, M. A., & Cho, M. (2016). The relationship between customer incivility, restaurant
frontline service employee burnout and turnover intention. International Journal of Hospitality
Management, 52, 97-106. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.10.002
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 25
Hayes, C. T., & Weathington, B. L. (2007). Optimism, stress, life satisfaction, and job burnout in
restaurant managers. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 141(6), 565-579.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.141.6.565-580
Hunter, E. M., & Penney, L. M. (2014). The waiter spit in my soup! antecedents of customer-directed
counterproductive work behavior. Human Performance, 27(3), 262-281.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2014.913595
Kim, H. J., Shin, K. H., & Swanger, N. (2009). Burnout and engagement: A comparative analysis using
the big five personality dimensions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28(1), 96-
104. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2008.06.001
Kjærheim, K., Haldorsen, T., Andersen, A., Mykletun, R., & Aasland, O. G. (1997). Work-related
stress, coping resources, and heavy drinking in the restaurant business. Work & Stress, 11(1), 6-
16. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.library.yorku.ca/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/
docview/619103353?accountid=15182
Kohn, P. M., O'Brien-Wood, C., Pickering, D. I., & Decicco, T. L. (2003). The personal functioning
inventory: A reliable and valid measure of adaptiveness in coping. Canadian Journal of
Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 35(2), 111-123.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0087193
Kohn, P. M., O'Brien-Wood, C., Pickering, D. I., & Decicco, T. L. (2003). Personal Functioning
Inventory [Database record]. Retrieved from PsycTESTS. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/t00882-
000
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 26
Lucas, R., & Deery, M. (2004). Significant developments and emerging issues in human resource
management. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 23(5), 459-472.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2004.10.005
Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). Maslach burnout inventory: Third edition.
Evaluating stress: A book of resources. (pp. 191-218) Scarecrow Education, Lanham, MD.
Retrieved from http://ezproxy.library.yorku.ca/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/
619146839?accountid=15182
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52,
397-422. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.library.yorku.ca/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/
docview/619576745?accountid=15182
Mathisen, G. E., Einarsen, S., & Mykletun, R. (2008). The occurrences and correlates of bullying and
harassment in the restaurant sector. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(1), 59-68.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00602.x
Murray-Gibbons, R., & Gibbons, C. (2007). Occupational stress in the chef profession. International
Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 19(1), 32-42.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09596110710724143
Pienaar, J., & Willemse, S. A. (2008). Burnout, engagement, coping and general health of service
employees in the hospitality industry. Tourism Management, 29(6), 1053-1063.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.01.006
Pratten, J. D. (2003). The training and retention of chefs. International Journal of Contemporary
Hospitality Management, 15, 237–242.
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 27
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with
burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-
315. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.248
Schnall, P. L., Pieper, C., Schwartz, J. E., Karasek, R. A., Schlussel, Y., Devereux, R. B., . . . Pickering,
T. G. (1990). The relationship between "job strain," workplace diastolic blood pressure, and left
ventricular mass index: Results of a case-control study. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical
Association, 263(14), 1929-1935. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.library.yorku.ca/login?
url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/617920722?accountid=15182
Schwartz, S. J., Hardy, S. A., Zamboanga, B. L., Meca, A., Waterman, A. S., Picariello, S., . . . Forthun,
L. F. (2015). Identity in young adulthood: Links with mental health and risky behavior. Journal
of Applied Developmental Psychology, 36, 39-52.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.10.001
Seymour, D. (2000). Emotional labour: A comparison between fast food and traditional service work.
International Journal of Hospitality Management, 19(2), 159-171.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4319(00)00009-8
Shirom, A. (2003). Job-related burnout: A review. Handbook of occupational health psychology. (pp.
245-264) American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10474-012
Statistics Canada. (2012). North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Canada 2012.
Retrieved from: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/12-501-x/12-501-x2012001-eng.pdf p. 455
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 28
Taylor, S. E., & Sirois, F. M. (2014). Health psychology (Third Canadian edition.). (pp. 212-213)
McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Taylor, S. E., & Stanton, A. L. (2007). Coping resources, coping processes, and mental health. Annual
Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 377-401.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091520
Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness
(eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678-
691. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678
Waterman, A. S. (2005). When effort is enjoyed: Two studies of intrinsic motivation for personally
salient activities. Motivation and Emotion, 29(3), 165-188. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-
005-9440-4
Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., & Conti, R. (2008). The implications of two conceptions of happiness
(hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. Journal of
Happiness Studies, 9(1), 41-79. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9020-7
Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., Hardy, S. A., Kim, S. Y., Lee, R. M., Armenta, B. E., . . . Agocha, V.
B. (2013). Good choices, poor choices: Relationship between the quality of identity
commitments and psychosocial functioning. Emerging Adulthood, 1(3), 163-174.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2167696813484004
Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Ravert, R. D., Williams, M. K., Agocha, V. B., . . .
Donnellan, M. B. (2010). The questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being: Psychometric properties,
BURNOUT, ADAPTIVENESS, AND PERSONAL IDENTITY 29
demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1),
41-61. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760903435208
Xanthopoulou, D., Baker, A. B., Heuven, E., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Working in the
sky: A diary study on work engagement among flight attendants. Journal of Occupational Health
Psychology, 13(4), 345-356. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.13.4.345
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships
between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational
Behavior, 74(3), 235-244. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.003
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Work engagement and
financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources. Journal of
Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(1), 183-200.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317908X285633